May 2, 1996KATHE'S AUTO SERVICE CENTER,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
The Agency argues that the Board should strike the response as being
untimely pursuant to 35 Ill.
Kathe Auto states that it did not receive the
motion to consolidate until April 8, 1996, thereby making its response timely.
Kathe Auto opposes the motion asserting
that it is only appropriate to consolidate two separate causes of action where they are the samein nature, arise from the same act or event, involve the same or like issue, and depend largelyon the same evidence.
While the Board is
appreciative of the intent of conserving re...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
