The reply filed by the Agency was not accompanied by a motion,
nor does the reply state why material prejudice would result if the reply were not allowed.
415 ILCS 5/57.7(c)(3) (2012).
Petitioner further claims that the Board rules do not include standards for the Agency toexercise the discretionary power under Section 57.7(c)(3) of the Act, and the Agency failed tocite specific reasons for requiring the project labor agreement. 20,1995).” Mot. Mot. at 3. However, the Agencyasserts the petition does not challenge the m...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf