The conditions remain in effect as those conditions were included in the permit.
Mot.
at 6-9.
Finally, Phillips maintains that the
Board’s remand did not identify the correct relief. 11, 1993), the Board observed that “the intended purpose of a motion for reconsideration isto bring to the court's attention newly discovered evidence which was not available at the time ofhearing, changes in the law or errors in the court’s previous application of the existing law.”Korogluyan v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. TheBoard’...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf