August 6, 2009ELMHURST MEMORIAL HEALTHCAREand ELMHURST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,Complainants,v.
CHEVRON U.S.A., INC.
Resp.
to Mot.
to File Reply at 5-6.
For the reasons below, the Board grants the complainants’ motion for leave to file a reply
and Chevron’s request for leave to file a sur-reply. Comp. at 7-8.On May 8, 2009, Chevron filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint(Ans.). Chevron stated in Affirmative Defense No. 2 that under Texaco Inc. v. Saunders, (In re Texaco Inc., 192 B.R. 937 (1995)), allclaims that the complainants may have had against Texaco were barred, because they weredischarged as a result of Texaco’s ba...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
