Rohm and Haas Company appeals on the grounds that (1) the new conditions are not
necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Act; (2) the conditions conflict with Section 9.1(a)of the Act (415 ILCS 5/9.1(a) (2002)); (3) the conditions create an unworkable and unpredictableset of conditions that potentially subject the plant to arbitrary enforcement; and (4) no violationwould occur if the prior FESOP was renewed as requested without the new conditions.
Adm.
Code 105.112(a).
Hearings “will be based exclusively on the record before the
A...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
