ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v.
EASTLAWN WATER COMPANY; JACK BROTMAN,
RONALD BROTMAN and W. I. BROTMAN,
a/k/a BROTMAN’S EASTLAWN ADDITION;
LARRY HILL; and RONALD W. K. LUCAS
November 14, 1972ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYv.
) #72—179
EASTLAWN WATER COMPANY; JACK BROTMAN,RONALD BROTMAN and W.
I.
BROTMAN,
a/k/a BROTMAN’S EASTLAWN ADDITION;LARRY HILL; and RONALD W.
K.
LUCAS
LARRY R, EATON, SPECIAL ASST. TheEnvironmental Protection Agency contends that the foregoing acts byRespondents constituted violation of Section 18 of the EnvironmentalProtection Act. We find that Respondent Hill and the corporate Respondent haveviolated the Act, Sec.l8,and will impose a penalty against Hilland a compliance order against the corporation as will be set forthin our Order. 2 (R. 119). The topography of the well site...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
