July 12, 1973ENVIRONMENTAl PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,vs.
They
request that we now approve the settlement which was earlier rejected by the Board on the ground that the settle~centproposal hereis similar to that we approved in EPA vs.
There
are also other differences, but in their Petition for Reconsiderationthe parties concentrate on showing that we misunderstand their1condition precedent~and that in actuality there is no trade—offinvolving a variance at the Will Scarlet Mine.
We repeat that variances are not to be included in such
bargaining.
The Motion for Reconsideration and Modification is denied.
I, Christ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
