whether alternati~7e methods had been investigated to achieve com-pliance with Rule 205(f) of Chapter Two, Petitioner alleged thatfailure to grant the Variance would mean curtailment of plantoperations and thus ~jeopardize the employment of 535 plant andsales personnel,Rule 205(f) of Chapter Two limits the discharge of anyorganic material into the atmosphere to no more than 8 pounds perhour from any single emission source.
EPA admitted that there were no citizen
objections to the Variance grant but agreed for Varianc...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf