December 19, 1974ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,vs.
Respondent
has objected to the motion, stating that the Hearing Officer displayed good judicial temperament and at no time displayed prejudicefor or against either party.
Our decision will be on
the merits of the case following the submittal of a settlementproposal or a record of the testimony taken in a contested hearing.
We sympathize with Complainant in its desire
to dispose of the case in the easiest manner possible, but theconversation at the pre—hearing conference will have no influence uponits ultimate outcome.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
