the porcelain spraying operation which fails to conform toRule 203(a) of the Air Rules.
The Agency further
notes that during an August 1, 1975 inspection, an Agencyengineer observed porcelain enamel particulate emissionsdrifting from two booth stacks across and beyond the plantroof.
19 — 58
—3—Both Petitioner and the Agency state that there havebeen no citizen complaints regarding Petitioner’s emissions.
It appears then, that any hardship to the Petitioner
at this point is self—imposed.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
