March 3, 1977ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, )) Complainant,v.
) PCB 75—388
CLARK OIL AND REFINING CORPORATION, ) Respondent.
v.
EPA, PCB 72-93, 4 PCB 69.
25 — 13
—2—In addition to utilizing the variance procedure, theBoard believes Clark could have operated within the law byfollowing a much simpler course of action.
In
fact, the Agency does not contest that it hadall the pertinent information before it priorto the hearing on this cause. Thirdly, Respondent argues that the Board should reconsiderand reverse its assessment of a penalty.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
