On October 8, 1981 GTE moved the Board for reconsiderationof its September 3 order denying variance.
v.
IEPA, PCB 80—211 (May 28, 1981),
and additionally asserts that variance could have been grantedwithout causing environmental harm.
Their
efforts to comply were not frustrated because, for example ofcumulati”ie problems caused by economic conditions that affectetithe company to an unusual degree (i.e., a 40 lay off). The~egrec of environmental harm is one of the factors balanced bythe Board against petitioner’s alleged “arbitrary or unreasonah1~hardship...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
