The Agency filed a response in opposition May 26, 1983.
Having reviewed the inch—thick filings in this matter, the
Board finds that it would be futile to deny the motion for reviewpursuant to 35 Ill.
The hearing officer’s April 15 denial of the motion to compel
attendance of a Springfield—based witness at a second depositionin a Chicago location, and denying an additional deposition of thatsame engineer is sustained, as is his subsequent refusal to certifyth...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
