ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. ROWE FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY and ROWE FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
February 10, 1983ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY, Complainant,v.
ROWE FOUNDRY AND MACHINE COMPANY, ) PCB 80-174
Respondent.
That motion is hereby granted.
The Board has received no public
comment other than that received as testimony at hearing in thismatter.
The
he exhaust duct apparently causes a reduction of the ~ the stack gases below that required for oxidationroxidu Ttere were no regulations for carbon monoxidee t~iethe equipment was initially installed.
Subsequently, in
SepterCbe~ tU /gency denied the renewal applicatio...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
