February 4, 1988ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTM~PROTECTION T~GE~ICY,Complainant,v.
) PCB 86—27
MODINE ~4T~NUF~CTURINGCOMPANY,Respondent.
The ~gency also conten~sthat Mo-line shoufl have applied for
a variance during the time of its intermittent noncompliance andthat Mo-5ine did not take an aggressive anoroach to achievingcompliance during that time.
The
~gency in making that claim, did not state what more £4odine couldhave done; i.e., how Mo’iine could h~vebenn more aggressive.
For these reasons, we dissent.
86—53
—2—I, Dorothy M. Gunn, ClerkBoard, h~rebycertify that thesubmitted on the ~/~TZ~ day of Ràr?ald C. FlemalJ cob D. ‘...
Allowed
Administrator
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
