April 6, 1989ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,V.
) PCB 86—27
MODINE MANUFACTURING CO.,Respondent.
The majority opinion, upon remand from the appellate
court, does address the guidelines of Section 33(c) of the Act,as I asked in my February 4, 1988 concurring opinion.
Section 33(c) sets forth some factors to
consider, but states that the Board’s consideration is “notlimited to” the articulated factors.) Allowing Modine to benefiteconomically by its non—compliance penalyzes Modine’s competitorswho have complied with the Act, and...
Allowed
scantmp5
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
