August 30, 1990REED-CUSTER COMMUNITY UNITSCHOOL DISTRICT NO.
This case represents an
honest disagreement over the legal interpretation of thestatutory phrase, “for the primary purpose.” If Reed—Custer’sposition on the legal meaning of the phrase is correct, thenCornEd’s application contains misrepresentations (albeit innocentmisrepresentations).
If CornEd’s legal interpretation is correct,
then the application is accurate.
Probably it would pollute the envircnment more, possibly it would
run less efficiently; but, it could continue to operate.
I find the majority reasoning unpersuasive.
They conclude
that the cooling pond is primarily f...
Allowed
scantmp2
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
