| PCB 90-100 11/08/90 Dumelle Dissenting Opinion |
| CITY OF OTTAWA v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY |
| |
| |
|
Handle:
|
Document-22870
|
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:34:49 AM CDT |
| Wednesday, April 23, 2003 08:38:12 AM CDT |
|
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
|
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 8, 1990CITY OF OTTAWA, Petitioner, PCB 90—100v.ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.- This is a high risk.
- The possibility of bone cancer or head
(sinus) cancer is great.way, Aurora is spending 9 times more per capita to reduce radiumthan the amount Ottawa thinks is excessive.- More of Ottawa’s citizens might have testified in objection to
this variance had they known the majority would increase theperiod requested by 150. ~ Dorothy M. ,~unn, ClerkIllinois Pollution Control Board116—42 |
| Allowed |
| Administrator |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| OCR0001.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 305730 |
| |
| |
| No |
|
Appears In:
|
PCB 90-100
|
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 90-100 11/08/90 Dumelle Dissenting Opinion
|