ECEV
    ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    CLERK’S
    OFFICE
    October
    1, 2009
    OCT
    012009
    ]N THE
    MATTER
    OF:
    )
    STATE
    OF
    ILLINOIS
    )
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    NO
    TRADING
    PROGRAM:
    )
    R06-22
    AMENDMENTS
    TO
    35 ILL. ADM.
    CODE
    )
    (Rulemaking
    - Air)
    PART217
    )
    HEARING
    OFFICER
    ORDER
    On August
    3,
    2009,
    the
    Illinois
    Environmental
    Regulatory
    Group
    (IERG)
    filed
    two
    motions
    in
    this
    rulemaking
    docket,
    a “Motion
    for
    Emergency
    Rule”
    and a
    “Motion
    for
    Expedited
    Action on
    the Illinois
    Environmental
    Regulatory
    Group’s
    Alternative
    Proposal.”
    In an
    order
    dated
    August
    20,
    2009, the
    Board
    denied both
    motions
    and
    directed
    the
    Illinois Environmental
    Protection
    Agency
    (Agency) to
    file
    a
    status
    report on
    or before
    October
    19,
    2009. On
    September
    14,
    2009, IERG
    filed a
    motion requesting
    that
    the Board
    reconsider
    and
    clarify
    its order.
    On
    September
    29,
    2009,
    the Agency
    filed a motion
    to file
    instanter
    and for an
    extension
    of the
    deadline
    to
    respond
    to IERG’s
    motion
    for
    reconsideration
    and
    clarification
    (Mot.).
    The
    Agency
    first notes
    that
    its response
    to the
    motion was
    due
    September
    28,
    2009.
    Mot. at 1-2;
    see
    35 Ill. Adm.
    Code
    101.500(d).
    The Agency
    states
    that it is discussing
    the
    issues
    raised
    in the
    motion
    for reconsideration
    and clarification
    with JERG
    and requests
    a
    two-week
    extension
    of the
    deadline
    to
    file its
    response
    to the motion
    to
    October
    12, 2009.
    Mot.
    at 2.
    The Agency
    further
    states
    that “[t]his
    Motion
    for Extension
    would
    have
    been filed
    on
    September
    28, 2009,
    but the
    parties were
    not
    able
    to
    fully
    confer
    until September
    29, 2009, on
    the contents
    of this
    Motion
    requesting
    the
    extension.”
    Id. The
    Agency reports
    that “IERG
    has been
    informed
    of this
    Motion
    and
    does
    not object
    to the relief
    being requested.”
    Id.
    Section 101.500(d)
    of the Board’s
    procedural
    rules provides,
    in
    pertinent part,
    that,
    [wjithin
    14 days
    after
    service
    of a motion,
    a party
    may file a
    response to
    the
    motion. If
    no
    response
    is filed, the
    party
    will
    be deemed
    to have
    waived
    objection
    to the
    granting
    of the
    motion,
    but the
    waiver
    of
    objection does
    not
    bind
    the Board
    or the hearing
    officer
    in its disposition
    of
    the motion.
    Unless
    undue
    delay
    or
    material
    prejudice
    would
    result, neither
    the Board
    nor
    the
    hearing officer
    will
    grant any
    motion
    before
    expiration
    of the
    14 day response
    period. .
    .
    .“
    35 Ill.
    Adm. Code
    101.500(d).
    The
    Agency
    has requested
    a 14-day
    extension
    of
    its response
    deadline
    and indicates
    that
    the participant
    moving
    for reconsideration
    and clarification
    does not object
    to such
    an
    extension.
    Under these
    circumstances,
    undue
    delay would
    result
    from allowing
    the
    full
    14-day
    response
    period
    to
    run.
    See 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code
    101.500(d).

    2
    Having
    reviewed
    the substance of the motion
    and in
    the absence to date of
    any objection,
    the Agency’s
    motion
    to file instanter
    is granted. The
    Agency’s motion
    for an extension
    of the
    response
    deadline
    is also
    granted
    with
    one minor modification.
    While the Agency
    has requested
    an extension
    of its deadline
    to Monday, October
    12, 2009, that day
    is the
    Columbus
    Day state
    holiday. Consequently,
    the Agency
    is directed to file
    its response
    to IERG’s motion for
    reconsideration
    and
    clarification
    on
    or
    before Tuesday,
    October 13, 2009.
    See 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code
    101.300(a).
    The “mailbox
    rule” at 35
    Iii. Adm. Code 101 .300(b)(2)
    does
    not apply to the filing
    of this response.
    The
    Board’s
    Clerk must receive
    the response
    before the close of
    business
    on
    Tuesday, October
    13,
    2009.
    Although
    the response
    may
    be filed electronically
    through the
    Clerk’s
    Office
    On-Line
    (COOL) from the Board’s
    Web
    site at www.ipcb.state.il.us,
    an electronic
    or approved fax
    filing must be
    received
    by
    the Clerk’s Office no
    later than 4:30
    PM on Tuesday,
    October
    13, 2009.
    Any questions about
    electronic
    filing
    through
    COOL should
    be
    directed
    to the
    Clerk’s Office
    at
    (312) 814-3629.
    IT
    IS
    SO
    ORDERED.
    Timothy
    J.
    Fox
    Hearing
    Officer
    Illinois
    Pollution Control
    Board
    100 West
    Randolph, Suite 11-500
    Chicago, Illinois
    60601
    (312)
    814-6085
    foxt(ipcb.state,il.us

    Back to top