2009-08-13 11:38
    ENVIRON
    217-451-3992
    >> 3128143669
    P
    2/4
    Lee
    R.
    Cunniitgham
    (rpcrt
    Invironi
    inti1
    CouncI
    unninghamidrnwor1d.com
    August
    12,
    2009
    ?.
    ii
    RECEIVED
    CLERK’S
    OFFICE
    AUG
    132009
    STATE
    OF
    IWNOIS
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    Mr. Timothy Fox,
    Hearing
    Officer
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    James
    R.
    Thompson
    Center
    100
    W.
    Randolph
    Suite
    l1500
    Chicago, illinois
    60601
    RE:
    Rulemaking R2006-22, In
    the
    Matter
    of’:
    NOx
    Trading
    Program:
    Amendments to
    35
    III.
    Adm.
    Code
    Part
    217;
    Response to
    Motions
    by
    the Illinois
    Environmental
    Regulatory
    Group
    Mr.
    Fox:
    The
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board’s
    (“Board”) August
    6, 2009
    Order
    requested
    responses
    to
    the
    Illinois
    EnviromnentaL
    Regulatory
    Group’s (“lRC3’)
    Motion
    for
    Emergency
    Rule
    and
    Motion
    for
    Expedited
    Action
    on
    TERG’s
    Alternative
    Proposal
    (coJiectively
    “Motions”).
    In
    respnse
    to the
    Board’s
    request,
    the
    Archer
    Daniels
    Midland
    Company
    (“ADM”) offers
    the
    following:
    1.
    ADM’s
    Decatur
    and
    Peoria
    Plants
    are
    subject
    to
    the
    NOx
    Budget
    Rule,
    35
    IlL
    Admin.
    Code
    Part
    217,
    Subpart
    U.
    Among
    the
    non-EGIJ’s
    affected
    by
    [ERG’s
    Motions,
    ADM’s
    Decatur
    Cgcneration Plant
    alone
    has historically been
    allocated
    1666
    allowances
    out
    of a
    total
    of
    4882
    allowances. As a
    result,
    ADM
    is
    the
    largest
    single
    entity
    aflóctcd
    by
    this
    rule.
    2.
    As part
    of a
    federal
    consent
    decree,
    ADM
    agreed
    to
    install
    Selective
    non-Catalytic
    Reduction
    (SNCR)
    equipment to reduce
    nitrogen
    oxides
    (NOx)
    on
    six
    boilers
    at its
    ADM
    1.
    Archer
    Daniels
    Midlai,d
    Conpany
    46ô6 Prhs
    ‘arkwiy
    ro.
    Box
    1470,
    Dccatiai
    Ii.
    62526
    T217.451.488:3
    I-
    217.451,4151

    2009-08-13 11:38
    ENVIRON
    217-451-3992
    >> 3128143669
    P 3/4
    Decatur Cogeneration Plant.
    The consent decree did not require
    this installation
    to be
    accomplished until 2012.
    3. 1
    lowever,
    due largely to the
    provisions of the NOx Budget
    Rule, ADM opted to
    install SNCR on the boilers at its Decatur
    plant in 2006. In the subsequent
    three years,
    NOx emissions were greatly
    reduced by the addition of
    this control equipment.
    4.
    ADM has not received NOx allowances for the
    2009 ozone season, nor
    for any
    subsequent years. As a result,
    ADM is subject to potential enforcement
    due to Illinois
    EPA’s failure to adopt an
    approvable SiP to allow USEPA
    to issue such allowances,
    5. The current version of
    the NOx Budget Rule, 35 Ill.
    Admin. Code Part
    217, Subpart
    U is a valid
    and enforceable regulation in Illinois
    that requires subject
    sources
    to hold
    NOx allowances
    for each ton ofNOx emitted during
    the
    ozone season by November
    30 of the applicable year. Since USEPA
    is
    no longer
    issuing allowances for the NOx
    Budget Trading
    Program, affected entities including
    ADM
    are left with
    no viable
    means of compliance. It is unclear whether
    affected
    non-FGIJs
    could
    purchase CAIR
    allowances
    in order to comply, and even
    i r
    they could
    do so, the
    purchase of
    sufficient CAIR allowances would be
    extremely
    expensive.
    6. In addition to the legal jeopardy, the
    lack
    of a valid rule places
    upon the
    alièetcd non
    EGUs, the inability to trade
    excess
    allowances which removes
    the
    incentive to over-
    control emissions
    and
    penalizes
    the entities, such as
    ADM, that have already
    done
    so.
    7. Under the
    market
    incentives of the NOx Budget
    Rule, affected
    non-EGIJs
    have
    reduced
    their collective ozone season
    emissions
    to
    approximately
    53% of their
    allocations. Absent such incentives,
    it is questionable
    whether
    this degree of
    emission
    control will be
    maintained.

    2009-08-13
    11:38
    ENVIRON
    217-451-3992
    >> 3128143669
    P
    4/4
    In
    light
    of
    the above,
    ADM
    requests that the Board grant
    IERO’s Motion for
    Emergency Rule
    in
    order
    to
    require
    that 2009 NOx allowances
    be distributed to affected
    sources, and
    grant
    TERO’s
    Motion 1kw
    Fxpedited
    Action on IERO’s Alternative
    Proposal in order to
    bring
    NOx
    SIP Call
    budget
    units inLo the
    CAIR NOx
    Ozone Season Trading
    Program
    (hr the
    2009 control period
    and
    beyond.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Archer Daniels Midland Company
    By:
    c
    4
    Lee
    R. CunninghanJ
    Corporate Environmental Counsel
    Archer
    Daniels Midland Company
    4666 Faries Parkway, P.O. Box 1470,
    Decatur, IL 62526
    217-451-4883

    Back to top