1. 09-103 Sangamon Prairie Port Farm – Williamsville v. IEPA – Upon receipt of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that specified facilities of Sangamon Prairie Pork Farm located in Sangamon County...

NEW CASES MAY 7, 2009 BOARD MEETING
09-82
Sangamon Prairie Pork Farm - Williamsville v. IEPA
09-83
North Fork Pork, LLC - West Point v. IEPA – Upon receipt of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that
specified facilities of North Fork Pork, LLC located in Hancock County are pollution
control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax
Code (35 ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).
– Upon receipt of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that
specified facilities of Sangamon Prairie Pork Farm located in Sangamon County are
pollution control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property
Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).
09-84
Red Oak Hills, LLC - New Salem v. IEPA
09-85
– Upon receipt of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that
specified facilities of Red Oak Hills, LLC located in Pike County are pollution control
facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax Code (35
ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).
Dan Reed - Illinois City v. IEPA
09-86
– Upon receipt of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that specified
facilities of Dan Reed located in Rock Island County are pollution control facilities for
the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/11-
10 (2006)).
Red Oak Hills, LLC - Newman v. IEPA
09-87
Dickerson Petroleum, Inc. v . IEPA – The Board directed petitioner to file an
amended petition on or before June 8, 2009, or this action will be subject to dismissal.
– Upon receipt of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that
specified facilities of Red Oak Hills, LLC located in Douglas County are pollution
control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax
Code (35 ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).
09-88
Deer View LLC - West Point v. IEPA
09-89
– Upon receipt of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that specified
facilities of Deer View LLC located in Hancock County are pollution control facilities for
the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/11-
10 (2006)).
Lone Hollow, LLC - Bowen v. IEPA – Deer View LLC - West Point v. IEPA
09-90
Upon receipt of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the
Board found and certified that specified facilities of Lone Hollow, LLC located in
Hancock County are pollution control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax
treatment under the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).
Wildcat Farms, LLC - Dallas City v. IEPA – Upon receipt of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and certified that
specified facilities of Wildcat Farms, LLC located in Hancock County are pollution
control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under the Property Tax
Code (35 ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).

09-91
People of the State of Illinois v. Ken Rawson, individually – Board accepted for
hearing this water enforcement action involving a site located in McHenry County.
09-92
Dynegy Midwest Generation (Tilton Energy Center) v. IEPA
09-93
– The Board
accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Vermillion County facility. No action
was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
Ameren Energy Generating Company and Gibson City Power Plant v. IEPA
09-94
– The
Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Ford County facility. No
action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
Ameren Energy Generating Company, Electric Energy, Inc., and Midwest Electric
Power, Inc. v. IEPA
09-95
Ameren Energy Generating Company and Venice Power Plant v. IEPA – The
Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Madison County facility. No
action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
– The Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a
Massac County facility. No action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of
specified conditions in the construction permit.
09-96
Holland Energy, LLC v. IEPA
09-97
– The Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal
involving a Shelby County facility. No action was taken on petitioner’s motion for
partial stay of specified conditions in the construction permit.
Ameren Energy Generating Company and Elgin Energy Center v. IEPA
09-98
– The
Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Cook County facility. No
action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
Amerenue and Raccoon Creek Power Plant v. IEPA
09-99
Union Electric Company d/b/a Amerenue and Goose Creek Power Plant v. IEPA –
The Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Cook County facility. No
action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
– The Board accepted for
hearing this permit appeal involving a Clay County facility. No action was taken on
petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the construction permit.
09-100
Union Electronic Company d/b/a Amerenue and Kinmundy Power Plant v. IEPA
09-101
– The Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Marion County facility.
No action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
Ameren Energy Generating Company and Grand Tower Power Plant v. IEPA
09-102
The Board accepted for hearing this permit appeal involving a Jackson County facility.
No action was taken on petitioner’s motion for partial stay of specified conditions in the
construction permit.
Peter Arendovich v. the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority – No action taken.

 
09-103
Sangamon Prairie Port Farm – Williamsville v. IEPA – Upon receipt of the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation, the Board found and
certified that specified facilities of Sangamon Prairie Pork Farm located in Sangamon
County are pollution control facilities for the purpose of preferential tax treatment under
the Property Tax Code (35 ILCS 200/11-10 (2006)).
09-104
People of the State of Illinois v. Village of Rockton
AC 09-40
IEPA v. Thomas and Valerie Hill – The Board accepted an administrative
citation against these Union County respondents.
– The Board accepted for
hearing this water enforcement action involving a site located in Winnebago County.

Back to top