BEFORE
THE ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARDCLE
8
CITY OF
CHICAGO
DEPARTMENT
)
Y
112009
OF
ENVIRONMENT,
)
STATE
OF
ILLINO,
)
Site Code:03 16485103
PolIutjo
Controj
80$d
Complainant,
)
)
AC:
2006-039
v.
)
AC: 2006-040
)
AC: 2006-041
JOSE
GONZALEZ & 1601-1759
EAST
)
AC: 2007-025
- Consolidated
130
TH
STREET,
LLC., iNC., ET AL.
)
)
Respondents.
)
RESPONSE CHALLENGING
CLAIMED
COSTS
Now come
Respondents Jose
Gonzalez,
and 1601-1759
East
130
th
Street,
LLC,
by and
through
their attorney, Jeffrey
J.
Levine,
P.C.,
and for their Response
Challenging
Claimed
Costs,
state
and assert
as follows:
1.
Pursuant
to the Board’s Interim
Opinion dated
March 19, 2009,
and the
Affidavit of
Costs
dated May 31, 2009,
Respondents
file the instant Response
Challenging
Claimed
Costs.
2. In
the
thirty-five page Interim
Opinion, the
Board directs that the
Clerk
of the
Board and
the Chicago
Department
of Environment (CDOE)
“provide
cost documentation
for the AC
06-40
and AC
06-41 hearings.”
$: March 19, 2009,
Interim
Opinion,
p.
3.
3.
In
response, the Assistant
Clerk of the Board
supplied an affidavit
and correspondence
dated March 31, 2009,
delineating
the
“true
and
accurate”
costs for the hearings
in AC
06-3
9, AC
06-40,
AC
06-41
and AC 07-25.
$ç:
Exhibit A, March31,
2009
correspondence
and
affidavit.
4. In a filing dated
April 15, 2009,
the
City of
Chicago
Department of
Environment indicated
that
it would not
seek hearing costs.
5. Because
the
CDOE
did
not
establish
that Speedy Gonzalez
Landscaping,
Inc., was liable
in AC 06-39,
Respondents
should
not be
responsible
for hearing costs
associated with
efforts related
to
those
charges.
6. Further, as the CDOE did
not prove that Respondents Mr. Gonzalez or
1601-1759 East
1
30
th
Street,
LLC., caused or allowed the
open
dumping
of waste in standing
water, Respondents
should not
be responsible
for hearing costs associated with efforts related to those charges.
7. Also charged but not demonstrated were the charges in
AC
07-25, against Respondent
160 1-1759 East
130
th
Street,
LLC.
Respondents
should
not be
responsible for hearing costs
associated
with
efforts related to that matter.
8. As the Board has determined, in the Interim Opinion, that numerous
allegations filed were
baseless, Respondents could not have conceded the allegations and accepted
the imposition of fines
in
those instances. Respondents were therefore required
to
proceed to hearing in order
to refute
the
unsubstantiated allegations.
9. For
this reason, the costs ofthe hearing cannot be attributable to the Respondents. To hold
Respondents responsible where certain allegations are found to be baseless
amounts to a form
of
extortion
where the
CDOE can
charges
baseless allegations and a
Respondent must either accede
to all charges or
become responsible for
paying the
costs
of a
protracted hearing to challenge
baseless allegations.
10. Because the March 19, 2009, Interim Opinion found that numerous charges against
Respondents were not established at hearing, the Opinion
specifically
requested
that the Clerk of
the
Board provide cost documentation for the AC
06-40
and
AC 06-41 hearings. The
March 31, 2009,
Affidavit of
Costs of
the hearings was not be bifurcated into portions indicating
the
specific
documentation
for the AC 06-40
and AC 06-4 1
hearings,
most likely
because
it would have been
impossible
to segregate testimony resulting in liability and non-liability. The testimony
of
most all
the witnesses,
in many instances, tended
to
exculpated
the
Respondents.
11.
It would be inequitable
to hold Respondents responsible for costs that resulted in
unsubstantiated
charges.
This would be akin to holding the CDOE responsible for Respondent’s
attorney’s
fees for the unsubstantiated
allegations.
12. As the costs for
portions of
the
hearing holding Respondent liable, cannot be separated
from those hearing
costs
related
to unsubstantiated allegations,
the
costs cannot
be
deemed
as “true
and accurate” as claimed in the March31, 2009,
affidavit. The affidavit
ignores the Board’s March
19,2009, instructions to
provide cost documentation for only the AC 06-40 and AC
06-41 hearings.
Wherefore, for the above and forgoing reasons, Respondents Jose Gonzalez,
and 1601-1759
East 1
30
th
Street, LLC, pray that this
Board
decline to impose costs for the hearings as
there
is no
basis to accurately determine
the
costs for
the AC 0 6-40 and AC 06-41 hearings
and for such further
relief as is just and equitable.
Dated: May 11, 2009
Jeffrey J. Levine,
P.C. #17295
20 North Clark
Street, Suite 800
Chicago,
Illinois 60602
(312)
372-4600
Submitted,
Jeffrey Levine, P.C.
Attorney’for Respondents
Josèki{zalez,
and
160 1-1759 East
130th
Street, LLC.
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
Cn
March
31,
2009
TO:
ALL
PARTIES
CONCERNED
01,
BOAJ
RE:
AC
2006-039,
City
of
Chicago
Department
of
Environment
v. Speedy
Gonzalez
Landscaping,
Inc.
(CDOE
#
06-02-AC)
AC
2006-040,
City of
Chicago
Department
of
Environment
v.
Jose
R.
Gonzalez
(CDOE
#
06-03-AC)
AC
2006-041,
City
of
Chicago
Department
of
Environment
v.
1601-1759
East
130
th
Street,
LLC
(CDOE
#
06-01-AC)
AC 2007-025,
City
of
Chicago
Department
of
Environment
v.
1601-1759
East
130
th
Street,
LLC
(Site Code
0316485103)
Pursuant
to
the
March
19, 2009
Interim
Opinion
and
Order
adopted
in
the
above-
referenced
matter,
attached
is
an
Affidavit
of
the
Costs
that
were
incurred
by
the
Board
as a
result
of hearing.
JTT/rne
Sincerely,
John
T.
Therriault
Assistant
Clerk
of
the
Board
Attachments
ThLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
March
31, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT
OF
)
ENVIRONMENT,
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
AC 06-39
)
(Administrative
Citation)
SPEEDY GONZALEZ LANDSCAPING,
)
INC.,
)
Respondent.
)
CITY OF CHICAGO
DEPARTMENT
OF
)
ENVIRONMENT,
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
AC06-40
)
(Administrative
Citation)
JOSE R. GONZALEZ,
)
)
Respondent.
)
CITY OF CHICAGO
DEPARTMENT
OF
)
ENVIRONMENT,
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
AC
06-41
)
(Administrative
Citation)
1601-1759
EAST 130th STREET, L.L.C.,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
CITY
OF
CHICAGO
DEPARTMENT
OF
)
ENVIRONMENT,
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
AC
07-25
)
(Administrative
Citatio’n)
1601-1759
EAST
130th
STREET,
L.L.C.,
)
(Consolidated)
)
Respondent.
)
AFFIDAVIT
OF
COSTS
I, John
T.
Therriault,
Assistant
Clerk
of
the
Pollution
Control
Board
(Board),
state
that
the
below-listed
Administrative
Citation
costs,
incurred
by
the
Board
as a
result
of
hearings
on
May
9
and
May
17,
2009,
in
the
above-captioned
proceedings,
are
true
and
accurate:
Pollution
Control
Board
Costs:
Hearing
Officer
$
0
Court Reporting:
May
9,
2007
$1,332.70
May9,
2007
$
76425
May
17,
2007
$
850.00
May
17,
2007
$1,949.25
Total
$
4.896.20
John
T.
Therriault
Assistant
Clerk
illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
Subscribed
and
sworn to
before
me
this
31st
Day
of
March,
2009
rCIALSEArH
Notaric
L87
2
12J
PROOF OF
SERVICE
I, John T. Therriault, do
state
that I have this
31st day of March, 2009, served the
attached
Affidavit of Costs
upon the
persons
listed below,
by placing
same in envelopes
addressed to said persons, first
class mail,
postage
prepaid, and depositing same in a United
States mailbox located at 100 West Randolph Street, Chicago,
Illinois 60601.
1601-1659 E. lO3th St. LLC
10630 S. Torrence
Chicago, IL 60617
Dennis W. Winkler, Ltd.
161 N. Clark
Street
Suite
3100
Chicago,
IL 60601-3242
City of
Chicago Department
of Environment
30
North LaSalle Street
Suite
500
Chicago, IL
60602
Chicago
Department
of
Law
30
North LaSalle Street
Suite
900
Chicago,
IL
60602
Jeffrey J. Levine
20 N. Clark Street
Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60602
Speedy Gonzalez, Inc.
P. 0. Box
359
Naperville,
IL 60566-03 59
Jo
T. Therriault
ssistant
Clerk
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE MB
THIS
31st DAY OF MARCH,
2009
Notary
flublic
“OFFICIAL
SEALS’
Nolary
Lynn
Pub1ic
Marie
State
Patras
of
IUinj
3
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOAR])
CITY OF
CHICAGO
DEPARTMENT
OF
ENVIRONMENT.
V.
Complainant,
JOSE
GONZALEZ
&
1601-1759
EAST,
130
th
STREET,
LLC.,
INC.,
ET
AL.
Respondents.
)
)
ECVED
)
Site
Code:031648
4
9<5
OFFICE
MY
I
9JflO
)
AC: 2006-039
-.
)
AC: 2006-040
STATE
OF
LL1NOS
)
AC: 2006-041
PoHuton
Contro
Board
)
AC:
2007-025
Consolidated
)
)
NOTICE
OF
FILING
TO:
Mr. Bradley
P.
Halloran
Illinois Pollution
Control
Board
100
West Randolph
Street,
Suite 11-500
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
Ms. Jennifer
A.
Burke,
Senior
Counsel
City
of Chicago,
Dept.
of
Environment
30 North
La Salle
Street,
9t
Floor
Chicago,
Illinois
60602
PLEASE
TAKE
NOTICE that
we
ha
this day filed
with
the
Clerk
of the
Illinois Pollution
Control
Board,
Respondent’s
Response
Cha
ging Claimed
Costs.
Dated
at Chicago,
Illinois, this
1
jth
day of May,
09.
Jeffrey
J. Levine,
P.C. #17295
20
North
Clark
Street,
Suite
800
Chicago,
Illinois
60602
(312) 372-4600
J
FRE J.LEVINE,P.C.
Atto
for Respondents
Jose
Gonzalez,
and
1601-1759
East
130
th
Street,
LLC.
PROOF
OF
SERVICE
The
undersigned,
being
first duly
sworn on
oath, deposes
and
says
that he served
a
copy of
the Notice
together
with the
above
mentió
documents
to
the person
to
whom
said
Notice
is
directed
by hand delivery,
this
1
1
th
day
of
IvNv2009.
J. LEVINE,
P.C.