E
CE
V
D
CLERK’S
OIRCE
FEB
2
STATE OF
QLINOJS
Pollution
Control
Board
OFFICE
OF
THE
ATFORNEY
GENERAL
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
Lisa
Madigan
Kr[ORNEY
GENERAL
February
24,
2009
t
John
T. Therriault,
Assistant
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
James
R.
Thompson
Center,
Ste. 11-500
100
West
Randolph
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
Re:
People
v. Stark
Excavating, Inc.
Dear
Clerk:
Enclosed
for
filing
please
find
the
original
and
ten
copies
of a
Notice
of
Filing,
Entry
of
Appearance
and
Complaint
in
regard
to
the
above-captioned
matter.
Please
file
the originals and
return
file-stamped
copies
to
me
in
the
enclosed,
self-addressed
envelope.
Thank
you
for
your
cooperation and
consideration.
Very
truly
yours
I
Steph
J. Janasie
Environmental
Bureau
500
South
Second
Street
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
(217)
782-9031
SJJ/pk
Enclosures
500
South
Second
Street,
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
• (217)
782-1090
TTY:
(877)
844-5461 • Fax:
(217)
782-7046
100
West
Randolph
Street,
ChicaEo,
Illinois
60601
• (312)
814-3000
• TTY:
(800)
964-3013 • Fax:
(312)
814-3806
BEFORE
THE ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE
OF THE STATE OF
)
ILLINOIS,
)
)
Complainant,
)
vs.
)
PCB No.
)
(Enforcement)
STARK EXCAVATING, INC.,
)
an Illinois corporation,
Respondent.
)
NOTICE
OF FILING
To:
do
Stark
David
Excavating,
K. Stark,
Inc.R.A.
rCQ
2.
O
Os
1804 West Washington
Street
Q0
Bloomington, IL 61701
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that
on
this
date I
mailed for filing with
the
Clerk of the
Pollution
Control Board of
the
State of
Illinois,
a
COMPLAINT,
a
copy
of which
is attached
hereto
and
herewith served upon you. Failure to file an answer to this Complaint within 60 days
may
have
severe consequences. Failure to answer will mean that all allegations in this
Complaint
will be
taken
as if admitted for purposes of this proceeding. If you have any
questions
about this
procedure, you
should contact the
hearing officer
assigned
to
this proceed.ing, the Clerk’s Office
or an
attorney.
1
FURTHER,
please take notice
that financing
may
be available,
through the Illinois
Environmental Facilities Financing Act,
20 ILCS
351
5/1 (2006),
to
correct the
pollution alleged in
the
Complaint filed in this case.
Respectfully submitted,
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
LISA
MADIGAN,
Attorney General of the
State of
Illinois
MATTHEWJ. DUNN, Chief
Environmental
Enforcement/Asbestos
Litigation Division.
BY:________________________
SØ,iianasie
Ass istant Attorney
General
Environmental Bureau
500
South Second
Street
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
217/782-9031
Dated:
February 24,
2009
2
CERTIFICATE
OF
SERVICE
I
hereby
certify that I
did on February
24, 2009, send by
certified mail, with
postage
thereon
fully prepaid,
by depositing
in
a
United States
Post Office Box
a true and
correct
copy
of the
following
instruments
entitled NOTICE
OF FILING, ENTRY
OF
APPEARANCE
and
COMPLAINT:
To:
Stark
Excavating, Inc.
do
David K.
Stark, R.A.
1804
West
Washington
Street
Bloomington,
IL 61701
and the
original and
ten copies by
First Class Mail with
postage
thereon
fully
prepaid of the
same
foregoing
instrument(s):
To:
John
T.
Therriault, Assistant
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control Board
James R.
Thompson
Center
Suite 11-500
100
West
Randolph
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
General
This
filing is
submitted on
recycled
paper.
RK
VED
OFFICE
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUT1ON
CONTROL
BOARD
FE9
26
2009
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
)
!2
OF
ILLttjø
ILLINOIS,
)
‘uttOn
Control
Complainant,
vs.
)
PCBNo.OS
(Enforcement)
STARK
EXCAVATING,
INC.,
)
an Illinois
corporation,
Respondent.
ENTRY
OF
APPEARANCE
On
behalf of
the
Complainant,
PEOPLE OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
STEPHEN
J.
JANASIE,
Assistant
Attorney
General
of the State
of Illinois,
hereby
enters
his appearance
as
attorney
of record.
Respectfully
submitted,
PEOPLE
OF THE
STATE
OF ILLINOIS,
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
of the
State
of Illinois
MATTHEWJ.
DUNN,
Chief
Environmental
Enforcement/Asbestos
Litig9i
BY:________________________
STAJS
I E
Envir6nrntaf
Bureau
Assistant
Attorney
General
500
South
Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
217/782-9031
Dated:
February
24, 2009
BEFORE
THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
PEOPLE OF
THE
STATE OF
ILLINOIS,
)
Complainant,
)
vs.
)
No. PCB 09-
)
(Enforcement)
STARK
EXCAVATING,
INC.,
)
anlllinoiscorporation,
)
ECEVED
)
CLERK’S
OFFICE
Respondent.
FEB
262009
COMPLAINT
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
P
I
t
oritrol
Board
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF THE STATE OF
ILLINOIS, by LISA M
I
,Attorney
General of the
State
of Illinois,
on her
own
motion
and
at
the
request of the ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
complains
of
Respondent,
STARK
EXCAVATING,
INC., as
follows:
COUNT I
WASTE
DISPOSAL
VIOLATIONS
1.
This
Complaint
is brought by the
Attorney General,
on her
own
motion and
at the
request
of the Illinois
Environmental Protection
Agency
(“Illinois EPA”), pursuant
to
Section
31
of the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection Act
(“Act”), 415 ILCS
5/31 (2006).
2.
The
Illinois EPA is an
agency of
the State of
Illinois
created
by
the
Illinois
General
Assembly
in
Section 4 of
the Act, 415
ILCS 5/4 (2006), and
charged, inter
a/ia, with
the
duty
of
enforcing
the
Act.
3.
Respondent
STARK
EXCAVATING,
INC., is an Illinois
perpetual corporation
in
good
standing
with
the Illinois Secretary
of State’s
Office.
Respondent’s
President and
registered
agent
is
Mr. David
K. Stark.
4.
Respondent operates
a clean construction
and demolition
debris
disposal
site
(“site”)
which
is located
in Section
5
of Downs
Township,
just
outside
of the
western
outskirts
of
Downs,
Mclean
County,
Illinois,
and
immediately
north
of Interstate
74.
The
site
is a former
sand
pit
owned
by Mr.
David
K. Stark.
5.
Section
21
of
the Act,
415
ILCS
5/21
(2006),
provides,
in pertinent
part,
as
follows:
No person
shall:
***
d.
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
or waste-disposal
operation:
**
*
2.
In violation
of any
regulations
or
standards
adopted
by the
Board
under
this
Act;
***
e.
Dispose,
treat,
store
or abandon
any
waste,
or transport
any waste
into
this
State
for
disposal,
treatment,
storage
or
abandonment,
except
at a
site
or facility
which
meets
the
requirements
of this
Act and
of regulations
and standards
thereunder.
*
*
*
6.
Section
22.51
(a)
of the
Act,
415
(LCS
5/22.51
(a)
(2006),
provides
as
follows:
a.
No person
shall
conduct
any
clean
construction
or demolition
debris
fill
operation
in violation
of
this Act
or any
regulations
or standards
adopted
by
the Board.
*
*
*
7.
Section
1100.201(a)
of
the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
or Demolition
Debris
Regulations, 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
1100.201,
provides
as
follows:
Prohibitions
a)
No
person
shall
conduct
any CCDD
fill
operation
in
violation
of the
Act or
any regulations
or
standards
adopted
by
the Board.
**
*
8.
Section
1100.210
of
the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
or Demolition Debris
2
Regulations,
35111.
Adm.
Code
1100.210,
provides,
in
pertinent
part,
as
follows:
The owner
or operator
must
maintain
an
operating
record
at the
facility
or
in
some
alternative
location
specified
in
the Agency
permit.
The owner
or operator
must
make
the
operating
record
available
for
inspection
and
copying
by the
Agency
upon request
during
normal
business
hours.
Information
maintained
in
the
operating
record
must include,
but
is not
limited
to,
the following:
*
*
*
b)
Written
procedures
for
load checking,
load
rejection
notifications,
and training
required
under Section
1100.205
of
this
Part.
*
*
*
9.
Section
1100.205
of the
Board’s Clean
Construction
or
Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35
Ill. Adm.
Code
1100.205,
provides,
in pertinent
part,
as follows:
Load
Checking
The
owner
or
operator must
institute
and
conduct
a load checking
program
designed
to detect
attempts
to
dispose
of
waste
at the
facility.
At
a
minimum,
the
load
checking
program
must
consist
of
the
following
components:
*
**
b)
Random
Inspections
1)
In addition
to
the
inspections
required
under
subsection
(a) of this
Section,
an
inspector
designated
by
the facility
must conduct
a
discharge
inspection
of at
least
one
randomly
selected
load
delivered
to the
facility
each day.
The
driver
of
the
randomly
selected
load
must
be directed
to
discharge
the
load at
a
separate,
designated
location
within
the
facility.
The
inspector
must
conduct
an inspection
of
the
discharged
material that
includes,
but is
not limited
to,
additional
visual inspection
and
additional
instrument
testing
using
the
instruments
required under
subsection
(a)(1)
of this Section.
All instruments
shall
be
interpreted
based
on the
manufacturer’s
margin
of error.
Any
reading
in excess of
background
levels
using any
of these
instruments
must result
in the
rejection
of he inspected
load.
In
addition,
any
reading in
excess
of background
levels
on any
monitoring
device
used by
the Agency
during
an
Agency
inspection
must
result in
the rejection
of
the inspected
load.
3
*
**
c)
Documentation
of
Inspection
Results
The
documentation
for each
inspection
must include,
at a minimum,
the
following:
1)
The
date and
time of
the
inspection,
the name
of
the
hauling
firm,
the vehicle
identification
number
or license
plate
number, and
the
source
of
the CCDD;
**
*
g)
The
owner
or
operator
must ensure
that all
appropriate
facility personnel
are
properly trained
in the
identification
of
material that
is not CCDD.
***
h)
All field
measurement
activities
relative
to equipment
and instrument
operation,
calibration
and
maintenance
and
data
handling
shall
be conducted
in
accordance
with
the following:
1)
“Test
Methods
for Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods”
(SW-846),
Vol. One,
Ch. One
(Quality
Control),
incorporated
by
reference
at Section
1100.104
of
this Part;
2)
The
equipment
or instrument
manufacturer’s
or vendor’s
published
standard
operating
procedures;
or
3)
Other
operating
procedures
specified
in the Agency
permit.
**
*
10.
Section
3.540
of
the Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.540
(2006) provides
as follows:
Waste
disposal
site.
“Waste disposal
site”
is
a site
on
which
solid waste
is disposed.
11.
Section
3.470
of the Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.470
(2006), provides
as
follows:
Solid
waste.
“Solid
waste” means
waste.
4
12.
Section
3.535
of
the Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.535
(2006),
provides,
in pertinent
part:
Waste.
“Waste”
means
any
garbage,
sludge
from a
waste
treatment
plant,
water
supply
treatment
plant,
or air
pollution
control
facility
or other
discarded
material,
including
solid,
liquid,
semi-solid,
or contained
gaseous
material
resulting
from
industrial,
commercial,
mining
and
agricultural
operations, and
from
community
activities
*
**
13,
Section
3.160(b)
of
the Act,
415
ILCS 5/3.160(b)
(2006),
provides,
in
pertinent
part:
b)
“Clean
construction
or demolition
debris”
means
uncontaminated broken
concrete
without
protruding
metal bars,
bricks,
rock,
stone,
reclaimed
or
other
asphalt
pavement,
or soil
generated
from
construction
or
demolition
activities.
Clean
construction
or
demolition
debris
does not
include
uncontaminated soil
generated
during
construction,
remodeling,
repair,
and
demolition
of utilities,
structures,
and roads
provided
the
uncontaminated
soil is
not commingled with
any
clean construction
or
demolition
debris
or other
waste.
*
*
*
14.
Section
1100.103
of
the Board’s
Clean
Construction
or
Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
1100.103,
provides,
in
pertinent
part:
“CCDD”
means
clean
construction
or
demolition
debris.
“CCDD
fill
operation”
means
the
use
of
CCDD
as
fill material
in
a current
or
former
quarry,
mine,
or other
excavation.
For purposes
of
this
Part, the
term
“other
excavation”
does
not
include
holes,
trenches,
or similar
earth
removal
created
as
part of
normal
construction,
removal,
or
maintenance
of
a
structure,
utility,
or transportation
infrastructure.
*
**
5
15.
On
or
about
September
25, 2007,
Illinois
EPA
inspectors
conducted
an
inspection
of Respondent’s
site.
At
that time,
Illinois
EPA
learned
that
Respondent
performed
no
inspections
of
incoming
loads
of clean
construction
and
demolition
debris
at the
site.
16.
On
or
about
September
25,
2007,
Illinois
EPA
inspectors
conducted
an
inspection
of Respondent’s
site.
At
that time,
Illinois
EPA
learned
that Respondent
maintained
no
records
on
site
of
the
incoming
loads
of
clean
construction
and
demolition
debris
at
the site.
17.
Respondent’s
site
is a
waste
disposal
site
as that
term
is
defined
in
Section
3.540
of
the
Act,
415 ILCS
5/3.540
(2006).
18.
Respondent’s
site
is
also
a CCDD
fill
operation
as that
term
is
defined
in Section
1100.103
of the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
of
Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35111.
Adm.
Code
1100.103.
19.
By
allowing
for
the
accumulation
and
use
of clean
construction
and
demolition
debris
on
site
without
following
the
requisite
inspection
and
record
keeping
practices,
Respondent
violated
Section(s)
1100.210(b),
11
O0.205(b)(1),
11 00.205(c)(1),
1100.205(g)
and
1100.205(h)
of
the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
or
Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35
Ill. Adm.
Code
1100.210(b),
11
00.205(b)(1),
11
00.205(c)(1),
1100.205(g)
and
1100.205(h).
20.
By
violating
the
above
referenced
Board
regulations,
Respondent
also
violated
Section(s)
21(d)(2),
21(e)
and
22.51(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5121(d)(2),
21(e),
22.51(a)
(2006),
as
well
as Section
1100.201(a)
of
the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
or Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35
III.
Adm.
Code
1100.201(a).
6
PRAYERFORRELJEF
WHEREFORE,
the Complainant,
People of the
State of
Illinois,
respectfully requests
that this
Board enter
an
Order against STARK
EXCAVATING, INC.:
A.
Authorizing
a hearing in this matter
at
which
time the Respondent
will be
required to
answer
the allegations
herein;
B.
Finding that the
Respondent has
violated the Act
and regulations as alleged
herein;
C.
Ordering Respondent
to
cease and desist
from any
further
violations of the
Act
and
associated
regulations;
D.
Pursuant
to
Section 42(a)
of the Act, 415 ILCS
5/42(a) (2006),
impose upon
the
Respondent
a
civil penalty
of not more than the
statutory maximum;
E.
Pursuant
to Section 42(f) of
the Act, 415 ILCS
5/42(f) (2006),
award the
Complainant its costs
in this matter,
including reasonable
attorney’s
fees and costs; and
F.
Grant such
other and further
relief as the Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
II
CCDD
FILL OPERATION VIOLATIONS
1 - 14. Complainant
realleges and
incorporates by
reference herein
paragraphs I
through
14 of
Count
las paragraphs
I through
14 of this
Count
II.
15.
Section
22.51(c)(2)(A)
of the
Act,
415 ILCS
5/22.51(c)(2)
(A)
(2006),
provides
as
follows:
c)
In accordance
with Title
VII
of this Act, the
Board may
adopt
regulations
to
promote
the
purposes
of this
Section. The Agency
shall consult with the
mining
7
and
construction
industries
during
the
developmbnt
of any
regulations
to
promote the
purposes
of this
Section.
*
**
2)
Until
the
Board
adopts
rules under
subsection
(c)(1)
of this
Section,
all
persons
using
clean
construction
or
demolition
debris
as
fill material
in a current
or former
quarry,
mine, or
other
excavation
shall:
A)
Assure
that
only
clean
construction
or
demolition
debris
is
being
used as
fill material
by
screening
each truckload
of
material
received
using a device
approved
by the
Agency
that
detects
volatile
organic
compounds.
Such devices
may
include, but
are
not
limited
to, photo
ionization
detectors.
All
screening
devices
shall
be
operated
and maintained
in
accordance
with
manufacturer’s
specifications.
Unacceptable
fill
material shall
be rejected
from the
site;
*
**
16.
Section
1100.205
of the
Board’s
Clean Construction
or
Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35111. Adm.
Code
1100.205,
provides,
in pertinent
part,
as
follows:
Load
Checking
The
owner
or
operator
must
institute
and conduct
a
load checking
program
designed
to detect
attempts
to
dispose
of waste
at
the facility.
At a
minimum,
the
load
checking
program
must
consist
of the
following
components:
***
a)
Routine
Inspections
1)
An
inspector
designated
by
the facility
must inspect
every
load
before
its
acceptance
at the
facility
utilizing an
elevated
structure,
a
designated
ground
level inspection
area,
or another
acceptable
method
as specified
in
the
Agency
permit.
In
addition
to a
visual
inspection,
the
inspector
must use
an instrument
with a
photo
ionization
detector
utilizing
a
lamp of
10.6
eV
or
greater or
an
instrument
with a
flame ionization
detector,
or other
monitoring
devices
approved
by
the Agency,
to inspect
each load.
All
instruments
shall
be interpreted
based on the
manufacturer’s
margin
of error.
Any reading
in excess
of
background
levels
using
any
of these
instruments
must
result
in the rejection
of the
8
inspected
load.
In
addition,
any
reading
in
excess
of
background
levels
on
any
monitoring
device
used
by the
Agency during
an
Agency
inspection must
result
in
the rejection
of
the inspected
load.
17.
On
or
about
September
25, 2007,
Illinois
EPA
inspectors
conducted an inspection
of
Respondent’s site.
At
that time,
Illinois
EPA
learned
that
Respondent did
not
use
a
photo
ionization
detector (“PID
device”)
to
inspect
incoming
loads
of
clean
construction
and
demolition
debris
at the
site.
18.
By failing
to
inspect
incoming
loads
of
clean
construction and
demolition debris
at
the
sitewith
a
PID
device,
the
Respondents have
violated
Section
22.51(c)(2)(A)
of
the Act,
415
ILCS
5/22.51(c)(2)(A) (2006),
as
well
as Section
1100.205(a)(1)
of the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
or Demolition
Debris
Regulations.
35111.
Adm.
Code
1100.205(a)(1).
19.
By
violating
the
above
referenced
Section
of the
Act,
as well
as
the
above
referenced
Board
regulation,
Respondent
also
violated
Section(s)
21(d)(2),
21(e)
and
22.51
(a)
of
the
Act, 415
ILCS
5121(d)(2),
21(e),
22.51(a)
(2006),
as
well
as
Section
1100.201(a)
of the
Board’s
Clean
Construction
or
Demolition
Debris
Regulations,
35111.
Adm.
Code
1100.201(a).
PRAYER
FOR
RELIEF
WHEREFORE,
the
Complainant,
People
of
the State
of
Illinois,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
grant
the following
relief
against
STARK
EXCAVATING,
INC.:
A.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this matter
at
which
time
the Respondent
will
be required
to
answer
the allegations
herein;
B.
Finding
that
the Respondent
has
violated
the
Act
and
regulations
as
alleged
herein;
9
C.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of the Act
and
associated
regulations;
D.
Pursuant
to
Section
42(a)
of the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/42(a)
(2006),
impose
upon the
Respondent
a monetary
penalty
of not
more
than the
statutory
maximum;
E.
Pursuant
to
Section
42(f)
of
the
Act,
415 ILCS
5/42(f)
(2006),
award
the
Complainant
its
costs in
this
matter,
including
reasonable
attorney’s
fees and
costs;
and
F.
Grant
such
other and
further
relief
as the
Board
deems
appropriate.
Respectfully
submitted,
PEOPLE
OF THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
LISA
MADIGAN
Attorney
General
of the
State
of
Illinois
MATTHEWJ.
DUNN,
Chief
Environmental
Enforcement/Asbestos
Litigation
Division
BY:_____________________
THOMAS
DAVIS,
Chief
Assistant
Attorney
General
Environmental
Bureau
Of
Counsel
STEPHEN
J.
JANASIE
Assistant
Attorney
General
500
South
Second
Street
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
217/782-9031
Dated:
February
24, 2009
10