IN THE
    MATTER
    OF:
    PETITION
    OF
    MAXIMUM
    INVESTMENTS,
    LLC)
    FOR
    AN
    ADJUSTED
    STANDARD
    FROM
    35
    ILL 1NOIS
    ADM1NISTRATWE
    CODE
    )
    740.210(A)3
    FOR
    THE
    STONEY
    CREEK
    )
    LANDFILL
    IN
    PALOS
    HILLS,
    IL
    )
    I, the
    undersigned,
    certify
    that
    I
    have
    served
    the
    attached
    Petition
    for
    Rehearing
    and
    Amended
    Petition
    for an
    Adjuste
    Standard,
    by
    depositing
    in the
    US
    Postal
    Service
    first
    classpostage
    prepaid
    on
    January,
    2009,
    upon
    the following
    persons:
    Pollution
    Control
    Board,
    Clerk
    100 WRandoiph
    Thompson
    Center,
    Suite
    11-500
    Chicago,
    IL
    60601-3218
    Division
    of Legal
    Counsel
    Illihois
    EPA
    1021
    N Grand
    Ave
    East
    P0
    Box 19276
    BEFORE
    THE
    ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOAR])
    ‘1.:3:4
    AS-09-02
    Certificate
    of Service
    • RECE!VED
    CLERK’S
    OFFICE
    JAN
    12
    iiO9
    STATE
    OF
    ILLINOIS
    P1tuon
    Control
    Board
    Springfield,
    IL
    6 1794-9276
    Richard
    Rosenbaum

    BEFORE
    THE
    ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOAR])
    IN THE MATTEROF:
    PETITION
    OF MAXIMUM
    INVESTMENTS,
    LLC)
    FOR
    AN
    ADJUSTED
    STANDARD FROM
    )
    35 ILL 1NOIS
    ADMINISTRATIVE
    CODE
    )
    740.210(A)3
    FOR THE STONEY
    CREEK
    )
    LANDFILL
    TN PALOS HILLS,
    IL
    )
    On December 18,
    2008, the
    Board dismissed
    this Petition
    on
    two
    grounds.
    First was a
    jurisdictional issue:
    that the
    Petition did
    not include a timely
    filed certificate
    of
    publication
    of notice of filing.
    Second was
    a
    deficiency
    because
    the
    Petition
    was
    not
    filed
    by an attorney.
    The information before
    the
    Board as to the first deficiency
    was
    incorrect.
    Notice
    of
    the
    Petition was published
    on
    November 18, 2008
    in the Southtown
    Star and
    a certificate of
    publication was
    timely filed
    with the clerk’s
    office. The
    clerk’s office
    erroneously failed
    to docket the certificate.
    The second
    deficiency is
    addressed
    by the attached Amended
    Petition
    filed by
    petitioner’s
    counsel, Weil
    &
    Associates
    Submitted
    by
    4+
    Liewellyn
    Kennedy
    Weil
    & Associates
    60
    Revere
    Drive
    Suite
    888
    Northbrook,
    IL 60062
    AS-09-02
    REC:ENVED
    CLERK’S
    OFFICE
    JAN
    12
    20U9
    STATh
    )
    ILLINOIS
    PoIIutio
    ontroI
    Board
    PETITION
    FOR REHEARiNG
    Wherefore
    Petitioner respectfully
    requests that
    the Board re-instate
    this matter
    and
    consider the Amended
    Petition.
    847-509-0015

    BEFORE
    THE
    ILLINOIS POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    INTHEMATTEROF:
    PETITION
    OF
    MAXIMUM
    TN
    VESTMENTS,
    LLC)
    AS-09-
    1-
    GLERK?S
    FOR
    AN
    ADJUSTED
    STANDARD
    FROM
    )
    35 ILL
    INOIS
    ADMINISTRATIVE
    CODE
    )
    740.2
    10(A)3
    FOR
    THE
    STONEY
    CREEK
    )
    STATE
    OF
    ILUNOS
    LANDFILL
    TN
    PALOS
    HILLS,
    IL
    )
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    PETITION
    FOR
    AN
    ADJUSTED
    STANDARD
    Petitioner:
    Maximum
    Investments,
    LLC
    Address:
    9437
    Karlov,
    Skokie,
    IL 60076
    Tel:
    847-673-4010
    Subject
    Property:
    Stoney
    Creek
    Landfill
    Address:
    10900
    S
    8411)
    St, Palos
    Hills,
    IL
    PiN
    #:
    23-14-400-026
    A:
    Standard
    from
    which
    an adjusted
    standard
    is sought
    Code
    section
    740.210
    (A)3
    requires
    written
    permission
    from
    the property
    owner
    be
    included
    as part
    of an
    application for
    the
    Site
    Remediation
    Program.
    Effective
    April
    25,
    2002
    B:
    Statement
    of
    general
    applicability
    The
    regulation
    was
    promulgated
    to
    meet
    the requirements
    of 415
    ILCS
    5/58.1(a)
    1
    C:
    Level
    ofjustification
    required
    The
    general
    regulation
    does
    not
    specify
    a
    level
    of
    justification
    required
    of
    a
    petitioner
    to
    qualify
    for an
    adjusted
    standard.
    Petitioner
    believes
    that
    factors
    related
    to
    the
    subject
    property
    are substantially and
    significantly
    different
    from
    factors
    relied
    upon
    by
    the
    Board
    in adopting
    the
    general
    regulation;
    that
    the
    existence
    of
    those
    factors
    justify
    an
    adjusted
    standard;
    the
    requested
    standard
    will
    not result
    in
    environmental
    or
    health
    effects
    substantially
    and
    significantly more
    adverse
    than
    the
    effects
    considered in
    adopting the general
    standard
    and that
    the
    adjusted
    standard
    is
    consistent
    with
    applicable
    federal
    law.
    D:
    Description
    of
    petitioner’s
    activity

    Petitioner holds
    a tax lien
    on
    the subject
    property.
    The
    subject
    property
    has been
    abandoned since the
    early 1970’s. Petitioner
    wishes
    to enroll the property
    in the
    Site
    Remediation Program
    before acquiring title
    so as to
    qualify for
    exemption as
    a prospective
    purchaser under
    415
    ILCS
    5/22.2b.
    E:
    Efforts
    necessary
    if
    petitioner
    were to comply with
    regulation
    of general
    applicability
    The
    general standard
    requires
    the written
    pennission of
    the property owner.
    Since
    there is no
    property owner,
    petitioner
    is
    unable
    to comply
    with the general
    standard and would
    be unable to enroll
    the property
    in
    the
    Site
    Remediation
    Program. The prior
    owner filed for bankruptcy
    in
    the
    1970’s and
    is
    now believed
    to
    be
    deceased.
    F:
    Proposed adjusted
    standard
    The
    requirements
    of
    section 740.2
    10(a) 3 requiring the
    written
    permission
    of
    the
    property
    owner
    for
    conducting investigative
    and remedial
    activities
    is
    hereby
    waived with regards
    to the subject property.
    There
    is
    no effort necessary
    to
    achieve
    this
    proposed
    standard and no costs
    will
    be
    incurred.
    0:
    Impact
    of
    petitioner’s
    activity
    on
    the environment
    There
    is
    no difference
    in
    impact
    on
    the environment between
    petitioner
    complying
    with the
    general standard
    versus the proposed
    adjusted
    standard. The
    proposed
    adjusted
    standard
    only changes
    the approvals
    needed to
    enroll the
    property in
    the
    Site Remediation
    Program.
    H:
    Justification
    of proposed
    adjusted standard
    Compliance
    with the general
    standard is not possible
    since
    the property
    is
    abandoned.
    Failure
    to
    grant
    an adjusted standard would
    result
    in
    the property
    not
    being enrolled
    in the Site Remediation
    Program and not
    being returned to
    productive use
    or the tax
    rolls.
    I:
    Reasons
    for
    granting
    proposed
    adjusted
    standard
    The
    adjusted
    standard
    requested does
    not
    have
    any impact upon
    the
    environmental standards
    ultimately
    to be imposed and
    merely
    addresses a
    procedural
    requirement
    under
    the Illinois Administrative
    Code.
    J:
    Statement regarding
    hearing

    Petitioner waives
    a hearing on the petition
    K:
    Citation of legal authorities
    No
    legal authority is cited.
    L:
    Additional information
    None
    Submitted by
    Liewellyn Kennedy
    Weil &
    Associates
    60
    Revere
    Drive
    Suite 888
    Northbrook, IL 60062

    Back to top