ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December 18, 2008
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    PETITION OF MAXIMUM INVESTMENTS,
    LLC FOR AN ADJUSTED STANDARD
    FROM 35 ILL. ADM. CODE 740.210(a)(3)
    FOR STONEY CREEK LANDFILL IN
    PALOS HILLS, ILLINOIS
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    AS 09-2
    (Adjusted Standard – Land)
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
    On November 7, 2008, Maximum Investments, LLC (petitioner) filed a request for an
    adjusted standard from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 740.210(a)(3). The Board finds that the petition has
    two deficiencies that are detailed below. Because of these deficiencies, the Board will not accept
    the petition and the petition is hereby dismissed.
    The first deficiency is a jurisdictional issue. Pursuant to Section 28.1(d)(1) of the
    Environmental Protection Act (Act), “petitioner shall submit to the Board proof that, within 14
    days after filing of the petition, it has published notice of the filing of the petition by
    advertisement in a newspaper of general circulation in the area likely to be affected.” 415 ILCS
    5/28.1(d)(1) (2006). The Board’s procedural rules require that within 30 days of the filing of the
    petition the petitioner must file a certificate of publication. The Board has not received proof of
    newspaper publication in this proceeding within 30 days of the filing date, November 7, 2008.
    The Board has consistently found that publication of newspaper notice of filing is jurisdictional.
    See In re
    SCA Tissue North America, L.L.C. for an Adjusted Standard from: 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    218.301 and 218.302(c) AS 05-1 (Jan. 6, 2005);
    In re
    Horsehead Resource and Development
    Company, Inc., for an Adjusted Standard under 35 Ill. Adm. Code 720.131(c), AS 00-1(Aug. 5,
    1999);
    In re
    Heritage Environmental Services, Inc. for an Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 702.126(d)(1), AS 00-14 (June 8, 2000). Therefore, absent proof of timely publication, the
    Board lacks jurisdiction to hear the requested adjusted standard petition.
    A second deficiency is that an attorney did not file the petition and has not entered an
    appearance. Though an individual may represent himself or herself, any person other than an
    individual must appear through an attorney in a Board adjudicatory proceeding, such as an
    adjusted standard action.
    See
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.100(a)(2);
    In re
    Recycle Technologies, Inc.
    for Adjusted Standard under 35 Ill. Adm. Code 720.131(c), AS 97-9 (Sept. 3, 1998). Although
    the Board generally allows for an amended petition when a non-attorney signs a filing, the
    jurisdictional deficiency warrants dismissal of the petition.
    The Board finds that the petition is deficient for two reasons . First, the Board does not
    have jurisdiction to hear the petition because the petitioner failed to provide proof of publication
    of the petition as required by Section 28.1(d) of the Act. 415 ILCS 5/28.1(d) (2006). Second, an
    attorney did not file the petition and an attorney has not filed an appearance, contrary to the

    2
    Board’s procedural rules. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.100(a)(2). Because of these deficiencies, the
    Board dismisses the adjusted standard petition for lack of jurisdiction to hear the petition.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, John T. Therriault, Assistant Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that
    the Board adopted the above order on December 18, 2008, by a vote of 5-0.
    ____________________________
    John T. Therriault, Assistant Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top