.L/U/UU
.L:Ib
tAA
5U4
BROWN
PRINTING
J!O1
—
Copy
to:
111.
Pollution
Control
Bd.,
do
Jon
Therriaul.t1
—
4
F
Rep
Ray
Lal-looci,
(copies
Sens
Risinger,
Koehier,
Reps
Goidon,
Le3th,
Schockj2)
Dear
Ray,
.....
)
-
DEC
°‘-‘
2008
As
I
have
informed
you
before,
Illinois
is
one
of
only
13
states
that
las
a
(toxic)
waste
landfill”
still
in
public
use,
Peoria
Disposal
Co’s.
Peoria
isIcthørd
only
urban
area.
with
such
a
landfill
a)
sitting
even
near
let
alone
directly
(50
feet)
above
the
aquifer
from
which
mOst
of
its
water
is
drawn,
and
b)
nation’s
only
city
with
such
a.
landfill
immediately
adjoining
it
and
directly
upwind
of
the
air
its
people
must
breathe.
And
a
5-country
study
in
Europe
found
that
babies
born
of
mothers
living
near
toxic
waste
landfills
had
41%
more
birth
defects
[The
Lancet
,l!26102j,
and
a
New
Jersey
study
revealed
twice
as
many
premature
births
and
a
five-fold
increase
in
low
birth
weights
near
its
former
Lipari
toxic
waste
dump
before
its
$125
million
cleanup.
Love
Canal,
with
less
than
a
100th
of.PDC’s
volume
of
toxcs,
cost
$247
million
to
rectify
in
1980s.
Now
a
peer
review*
of
Jj,
New
York
State
(outside
NYC)
hospital
records
revealed
“strikingly
elevated”
and
diverse
health
problems
near
hazardous
waste
sites.
Based
on
“hospitalization
disCharge.
rates”,
for
patients
from
areas
near
a
landfill
containing.
“hazardous”
wastes
compared
to
patients
from
“clean”
areas,.
the
differences
were:
Diabetes
hospitalization
rate
--
25%
greater,
hut
36%
greater
among
people
living
along
the
Hudson
River
(attributed
to
[probably
fumes
of]
toxic
wastes
going
into
the
river
from
upstream
sources).
[Note:
Could
this
apply
as
well
to
the
Illinois
River?]
Coronary
heart
disease
hospitalization
rate
--
15%
more,
and
.20%
more
for
“acute
myocardial
infarction”
(dying
heart
muscle);
plus
higher
overall
blood
pressure.
But,
like
diabetes, along
the
Hudson
River
the
rate
was
35.8%
more,
and
39.1%
more
for
AMI.
These
differences
are
despite
people
along
the
Hudson
having
“higher
average
income”
and
“there
is
less
smoking,
better
diet,
and
more
exercise.”
Stri
hospitalization
rate
.--
15%
more
among
people
living
near
toxic
waste
sites.
Hypertension
rate
--
19.2%
higher
in
people
living
near
toxic
waste
landfills
containing
PCBs,
dioxins,
and
chlorinated
pesticides
as
well
as
“othe?’
toxic
wastes,
and
10%
greater
in
sites
containing
“other”
toxics,
but
not
the
particular
aboye
culprits.
(PCBs
are
an
issue
at
Peoria
Disposal
Co.’s
landfill,
but
dioxins
and
pesticides
are
on
EPA’s
permitted
list.)
Asthma
and
infectious
respiratory,
disease
hospitalization
rate
--
15%
higher
for
infectious
respiratory
disease
in
people living
in
the
vicinity
o.f
toxic
waste
sites,
19%
higher
for
chronic
obstructive
pulmonary
disease,
and
9%
higher
for
asthma.
One
of
the
“major
routes
of
exposure”
is
“inhalation
of
contaminated
air
near
hazardous
waste
sites,”
the
study
states.
[53,000
live
within
3
miles
of
Peoria’s
toxic
waste
landfill.]
As
to
the
above
findings,
there
are
still
more
to
come,
the
researchers
say.
NOTE;
If
the
state
or
federal
government
wants
a
hazardous
waste
landfill
in
Illinois,
it
needs
to
find
the
safest
location
pcssib1e
-
and
the
government
itself
must
run
the
landfill,
or
directly
contract
out
its
operation,
with
constant
government
oversight.
There
ar
far
less
dangerous
locations
than PDC’s
right
in
Peoria.
Even
in
just
the
four-county
area
surrounding
Peoria
there
are
over
100,000
acres
of
former
stripmined
land,
of
which
15,000
in
Fulton
County
are
still
owned
by
the
Cook
County
Reclamation
District,
farmland
already
permitted
for
sewage
sludge
rec.ycling,
but
now
only
fanned.
And
there
certainly
are
better
ways
of
dealing
with
toxic
waste
than
simply
burying
it
under
a
layer
of
dirt
where
it,
literally
forever,
remains
a
toxic
hazard.
.
>
*
I
have
copies.
Overseeing
author
is:
D.C.
Carpenter,
Institute
for
Iea1th
ç
Enviromnent,
Univ.
of
Albany,
5
University
P1.,
A217,
Rensselaer,
N.Y.
12144
-
3429.
Phone
(518)
525-2660
Cj-4
Tom
Edwards/River
Rescue
902
W.
Moss
Ave.,
Peoria,
IL
61606