BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
FOX MORAINE, LLC
Respondent.
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED CITY
COUNCIL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
OF YORKVILLE, CITY )
)
)
)
PCB No. 07-146
(Pollution Control Facility Siting
Appeal)
NOTICE OF FILING
To:
See Attached Service List
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October 7,2008, Leo P. Dombrowski, one of
the attorneys for Respondent, United City of Yorkville, filed via electronic filing the
attached United City of Yorkville's Reply in Support of Its Motion in Limine # 4,
with the Clerk
of the
Illinois Pollution Control Board. a copy
of which
is herewith served
upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
By:
lsI
Leo
P.
Dombrowski
One of their Attorneys
Anthony G. HoPI'
Thomas 1. Matyas
Leo P. Dombrowski
WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON
LLP
225 West Wacker Drive, 30th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Phone: (312) 201-2000
Fax: (312) 201-2555
hopp
l/
""ildrnan.com
lll;llyas
1/
\\
ildlll~n.c\Hl1
domhro\\s/"j {/ \\ iIJm:ll1.l';Om
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
FOX MORAINE, LLC
)
)
Petitioner.
)
)
v.
)
)
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, CITY )
COUNCIL
)
)
Respondent.
)
PCB No. 07-146
YORKVILLE'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION
IN LIMINE
NO.4
Fox Moraine LLC ("Fox Moraine"') should never have received the Wildman, Harrold,
Allen
&
Dixon LLP ("'Wildman Harrold") legal bill dated June IS, 2007. It is a privileged
document that was produced inadvertently.' Having obtained the document, however, Fox
Moraine claims to have found in
it all manner of hidden meanings and proof of non.existent
intentions and events. Fox Moraine's arguments based on the invoice range from strained to
knowingly false.
The Wildman Harrold invoice has provided a diversion for Fox Moraine during the
discovery phase
of this appeal, but the sideshow must end. The invoice is not relevant to any
issue in this appeal, and should not
be part of the evidence at the hearing or the record going
forward. Yorkville requests that this Board grant its Motion
in Limine
No.4.
I.
IT WAS APPROPRIATE FOR YORKVILLE TO HIRE NEW COUNSEL
AFTER THE APRIL 2007 ELECTIO S.
Valerie Burd was elected Mayor
of Yorkville on April 17, 2008. At the time, Yorkville
was nearing the end
of lengthy hearings on Fox Moraine's siting application and a decision
deadline was looming. As Mayor.elect, Ms. Surd decided that the City needed independent
I
This hearing officer has rejected Yorkville's privilege claims regarding the invoice.
Yorkville
respectfully disagrees with this ruling and intends to appeal il,
if
necessary.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
legal advice and additional legal services to complete the hearing process. Even before she was
sworn in, she began the work necessary
to make sure that Yorkville had competent, independent
legal advice. Her initial interview with Wildman Harrold occurred on April 30, 2007.
Withtn
minutes after she was sworn in as Mayor on May 8, 2007, she proposed to the City Council that
Yorkville hire Wildman Harrold as city attorneys. The City Council approved the appointment.
(A copy of the City Council's minutes of May 8, 2007 are attached as Exhibit A).
After their interview with the Mayor on April
3D, 2007, the Wildman Harrold attorneys
who
had offered to assist the City began work. With the decision date 011 the local siting
application approximately three weeks away, and over
140 hours of hearing transcripts and tens
of thousands of pages of
highly~technical
material to review, waiting until an official
appointment from the City would have been unwise.
It
is undisputed, however, that had
Wildman Harrold not been approved as city attorneys
by the City Council. Wildman Harrold
would not have been paid
for any of this work.
Wildman Harrold accepted the risk of
nonpayment in order to be of maximum potential service to the City.
Fox Moraine makes much
of the work Wildman Harrold did for the City before it was
officially appointed City attorney, but this is a non-issue. Any prudent lawyer would have done
the same, given the time pressure involved and the prospective
client's need for legal advice. As
it happened, the full City Council later reviewed the invoice and approved it for payment,
ratifying Wildman Harrold'sdecision to begin work before
it was officially appointed.
The invoice itself is not evidence
of bias, but rather evidence of Yorkville's need for
independent legal advice and Wildman Harrold's thorough preparation for providing that advice.
Yorkville will not engage
in a
point~by~point
response to Fox Moraine's highly inaccurate
characterization
of the invoice.
It
is enough to say that a review of the invoice as a whole
2
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
demonstrates that Wildman Harrold was engaged to advise the City on its rights and legal
obligations
in the landfill siting process, and that this is exactly what Wildman Harrold did.
There is no evidence that Wildman Harrold was hired to justify denial
of Fox Moraine's siting
application, and Fox Moraine"s claims to that
eITect are not supported by the invoice or any other
testimony
or document. The invoice is therefore irrelevant.
II.
THE ROTH MEMO IS NOT EVIDENCE OF BIAS.
The legal memorandum prepared by City attorney Michael Roth is the subject of a
separate motion and
will
be
addressed in separate briefing. Briefly, hovolever, there is no
authority for Fox Moraine's apparent contention that a city like Yorkville is not allowed to seek
independent advice from its own lawyers on the landfill siting process. Fox Moraine compares
the memorandum prepared by Wildman Harrold to the reports prepared
by Hearing Officer Larry
Clark and Derke Price. the attorney engaged to advise City
stafT, but the comparison is
completely unjustified. The report prepared by Mr. Clark was required by Yorkville's siting
ordinance and was required to
be
made part of the record. The siting ordinance also required that
if Mr. Price prepared a report, it too was required to be made part of the record. Wildman
Harrold's work was neither required by nor prohibited
by the local siling ordinance or any other
state or local law.
It
is absurd to contend that Yorkville is 110t allowed
10
seek legal advice or
that the mere fact that Yorkville sought legal advice
is evidence of bias.
Moreover, Fox Moraine's attempt
to read the invoice to dctcnnine what was in the Roth
memorandum is a clear attempt to invade Yorkville's attorney-client privilege. As such, it is
unconscionable and should not be tolerated. Certainly. arguments and discussion which guess
at
privileged communications are not appropriate topics for the hearing on this appeal.
3
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
1lI.
FOX MORAINE KNOWS THAT THE CITY CONSIDERED MULTIPLE
RESOLUTIONS.
Fox Moraine contends that Wildman Harrold prepared only one resolution for the City
Council's consideration and that the single resolution was to deny Fox Moraine"s siting
application. They offer Wildman Harrold's invoice as proof
of this claim. The invoice,
however, is irrelevant to this contention because the hearing transcript belies
it. Worse, Fox:
Moraine knows that its "single
resolution"
claim is not tme.
The transcript of the May 24, 2007 City Council meeting demonstrates that the City
Council was presented with three resolutions on that day. (May 24, 2007 lIearing Tr. At pp. 32-
33, attached as Exhibit B). Mr. Roth. the City attorney, stated on the record that he had prepared
resolutions for the City's consideration based on the City Council's deliberations of May 23,
2007.
Mr. Roth advised the City Council that it was entitled to: I) approve Fox Moraine's
application; 2) deny it, or; 3) deny it with conditions.
Id
Mr. Roth referred the City Council to
the multiple resolutions he had prepared.
(Id.
at 33.) Alderman Munns clearly stated that he had
three resolutions before him at that time.
(/cl.)
Fox Moraine's representatives and their auomey, George Mueller, were in aUendance at
the May 24, 2007 City Council hearing.
2
They know that three resolutions were offered to the
City Council because they heard the resolutions discussed.
If their memories are faulty, they can
read the transcript. For Fox Moraine
to now argue that the City Council was biased because it
considered onJy one resolution is inexcusably disingenuous.
But the fact that Fox Moraine is brazen enough
10
think it can use the Wildman Harrold
invoice
to advance arguments it knows to be false is proof of how far Fox Moraine will go to
misrepresent both the invoice and the facts. The Board cannot prevent Fox Moraine from
2 Counsel for Yorkville, Anthony Hopp, sat directly behind counsel for Fox Moraine. George Mueller, on
May 24. 2007. For Fox Moraine to now misrepresenllhe events of May 24, 2007 is shameful.
4
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
making future false statements, but it can take the Wildman Harrold invoice out of Fox
Moraine's hands and thereby eliminate one vehicle
for such extraneous and knowingly false
claims.
IV.
YORKVILLE DID NOT ILLEGALLY DELEGATE ITS AUTHORITY.
Finally, Fox Moraine accuses Yorkville of illegally delegating its authority to its
attorneys. This argument is also disingenuous and inaccurate. As Fox Moraine knows (because
it was there) one of the resolutions presented to the City Council on May 24, 2007 was denial
with conditions. Mr. Roth had drafted the resolution based on the City Council's members'
deliberations at the May 23, 2007 hearing. Some
of the City Council members, however,
proposed even further conditions on May 24, 2007. (Ex.
Bat pp. 19-28). Mr. Roth cautioned
them that some
of these new conditions may not be appropriate or legal. (Ex. B at pp. 33-35.)
The City Council authorized Mr. Roth
to remove any illegal conditions before presenting a final
resolution
for signature. (Ex. B al 37-39.) The City Council's instructions to Mr. Roth,
therefore, were
to remove items from the ordinance they had crafted at the meeting on May 24,
not to add provisions. Asking an attorney
to remove illegal conditions can hardly be called an
illegal delegation
of authority to the attorney.
More importantly, the invoice
is not evidence of what the City Council did or whether its
activities were legal. The City Council conducted its deliberations and instructed
Mr. Roth in
public, on the record. George Mueller. Fox Moraine's attorney, was in the audience at that time.
For Fox Moraine to now suggest that
it requires the Wildman Harrold invoice to make baseless
arguments about alleged illegal delegation offends common sense.
5
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
V.
CONCLUSION
Fox Moraine would have preferred the Yorkville City Council complete the local siting
hearings in this matter without independent legal advice. The City Council, however, wisely
chose to seek advice on its rights and obligations
in the process. At the conclusion of their
deliberations, the City Council asked their attorney
to make sure that their resolution was a
lawful one. This is not evidence
of bias or prejudgment, but rather just the opposite.
The City Council's activities and deliberations were conducted in public, on the record.
The record demonstrates that Yorkville was careful to protect Fox Moraine's rights throughout
the local siting process. The Wildman Harrold invoice
is in no way relevant to the issues in this
appeal. The record demonstrates that Fox Moraine's arguments based on the invoice are either
baseless or intentionally false. Fox Moraine should not be allowed to continue to clutter the
record
in this appeal with such nonsense. Yorkville respectfully requests that its Motion
in
Limine
No.4 be granted.
Respectfully submitted.
THE UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE
By:
lsi
Leo P. Dombrowski
One
of its Attorneys
October 7, 2008
Thomas
I.
Matyas
Anthony G. Hopp
Leo P. Dombrowski
WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN
&
DIXON LLP
225 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone:
(312) 201-2000
Facsimile:
(312)
201-2555
malvaswl\hoppfa'wildman.com
-
....ildman.com
dombro\\skim \l,.ildman.com
6
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
EXHIBIT A
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
MINUTF,S OF THE REGULAR MEETING QF Tin; CITY COUNCIL
OF THE UNITED
ern'
OF VORKV1LI,E, KENOALL COUNTY. JLUNOIS,
HELP IN THE CITY COUNCIL CijAMBERS,
800 GAME fARM ROAD ON
TIJESDAV, MAy
8,
1007,
Mayor Prochaska called the mel:ling 10 order III 7:00 P.M and led the Cooneil in lhe Pledl:e of
Allegiance
ROLLCAl.L
Clerk Milsehewski ealled the roU
'1'i.: ", Ll
Wlird
I
Wi1rd
II
Ward IV
J::lmes
Leslie
Burd
Golinski
Botk
Munns
Bcsto
Spears
Absen!
Plescnt
PrCSC11l
Presenl
Present
Present
Present
?~senl
Also present: City Clerk Milscllewski, Cil)'Trellsuref Powell, City Anomey Wyeth, lnlc,im City
Auorlley ROlh, Interim City Administrlltor Crois, Assistllnt City Adminisll"lltor Olson. Finanee
Director Mikll, Director of Public Works Dhuse, Policc Chief Manin, DirectorofParlt
&:.
Recreo.tion Mogle, Community Development DireetOf Miller, City Engineel Wywrot lind Public
Rellitions
Officel Spies
OUORUM
A quorum was established.
SWEARING-IN;
Mayor
P~
sl.llted tba.t it fgs
~
an honor:wl privilc:ge to serve the people of the United
City ofVorirville
He noted thatlhcn: life tlIeiling lime.!: ahelld for the community as welilU
eh::lllenl:CS He slllted t11011 while things mi1)'''times seem arduous there will be mllny
opponunities ahead He e"pressed his wish Ihllt the new Coulleil would be able to recogniu the
bc:!it of tile opponllllilie$
IUId
have the slR:ngUt to act upon them in lhe best [meresl of the United
City ofVorkvillc: He then
v3C~ted
his seal
Ma)'OI-elti:I Burd introduced Judge McC;mn who ploc:ecdcd 10 SWC:lr in Cit)' TfCllSun:r William
Powell, City Clerk Ji1cquel)'n Milsthewski, W::lrd I Alderml1l1 Waltet Wcrdcrieh, Ward 2
Alderman Arden Joseph Plocher, Ward J Ak!eFrnlln Robyn SUlcliff, Wllrd 4 Aldcrman Rose Arm
Spea~
l1l1d Mayor VlIlerie Burd
INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS
Mayor Burd asked lhe $tllrrand guests to inlloduec themselves She welcomed lhe Buests lind
asked them 10 enter their nllmes on the allendllllte SheCI provided
AMENDMENTS
TO THE AGF.NDA
Mllyor Surd requested thllt an
emergen~)'
exeeUlive session be lidded 10 tftc end ofthe meeting
before
the Additional Business seCiion of the agenda. She slated th;ltthc:re will be lIelion t.:tken
;Ifterw:lrd A mOl ion 'vas made b)' Aldcrmlln Werdcrich; seconded by Aldenlll1l1 Spears
Motion approved
by
II roll
<::1.11
vote
A)'cs-S
NIYS-O
Beseo-IYC, LesJie-;IYC:, Golinski-lye, Wcrderieh,aye,
Munns-aye. Plocher-aye,
Spc;llS-a)":, Sutcliff-aye
COMMJmE MEETING DATES
Public WOIk$; Commillee
EconomiC Development Committee
Adminis1r.uion Commillcc
Commillcc
of the Whole
7:00 PM, TuC$doy, MIlY lS, 2001
Cit)'ofVmkviIJe COIlrelcncc
Room
Commillee ofthe Whole
7:00 PM, Tuesda)', May IS, 2007
City ofVorkville Conference Room
Commincc oflile Whole
7:00 PM, Tuesdlly, June 5, 2007
City ofVorkville COnfclcnee Room
EXHIBIT
A
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
The !\tinut« orthe Regubr Meeting of lilt elly eountil- {\1"" 8, 2007 p:tl!.,2
Public Safety Commiuee
PRESENTATIONS
N~
PUBLIC HEAWGS
Non~
Comminee of Ute Whole
1:00 PM, Tuesday, June 5, 2007
City ofVcxkville Conference
Room
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Darrel Brown,
1262 Highpoint Road, congratulated tlte newly elecled officials He also
expressed his concern wilh lhe composting facility owned by Don Hammon He nOled Ihatthe
odor from it is adl'erscly;,.rreeling Itis way of life and is tlte warS! il Itas been in lite la.sl seyen
years
He staled thaI it smells 50 bad lltat his children h:tve to sl.lly indoors He speculated that tht
odor is relOled to lhe proposed landfill He sUlled thaI he left Building Inspeclor Bill Dettmer
several mllsuges reponing lhe issue and finally spoke directly to him earlier in lhe day He
requested the City Coundl hold Mr Hammon meeountable for his oper.uion and possibly roise lhe
Sllllldards for il Cily AdminisLrlllOr Crois reported lhat Mr Ocnmer was oul on lhe sile loday and
will be preparing a repon for lhe City Council He also tteommended that those making
complaints leave their
name and lelephone number when they ean so thaI Mr Denmer can
respond 10 them
Brimn leClercq, Village pfe$idenl of Oswego, thanked Mlyor Surd for inviting him 10 the
ITJttting. He conerltulaled
~nc
and commented that
th~
will be I 101 ofWOl'k wad willt
many thinl>5 happening He invited the City Counc:i11o meet with Oswego's
Bortnt
of Trustees so
that
lIle two communities ean won together
Joanne Gilbert, 17]0 E Highpoinl, commented thai sbo WllS told by a lawyer that complaints
3gain51 Mr Hammon'sopenlion need 10 be filed wilh the Illinois Environmental Protection
Aseney however
she has I toIJrt order dated April
I!,
1995 from the Kendall County coun which
slales
that compllints eatl be made to the Kencbll County Health Department in lieu of lite IEPA
She asked if this process lf1lIlIsfel'510 the City now th3t the property IIlIS
be~
llOQe):ed City
Anomcy Wyelh slated that he h3d 001 seen the eourt order but the City could be the enfaretr ir
applicoble
Mlrilyn Michelini, Villase Prnidenl or MontGomery congralulaled the newly elected officials
and slaled thaI sha looked forward 10 working logelher with lhem
Tom
Gilmo~,
county resident, wished ti,e newly eleeled members of the City Couneillhe best of
luck He stoted thallhere WllS a brigltt future for Yorkl'ille llnd he wished lhe new membtrs the
IICry besl
CONSENT AGENDA
I Morllhly Trea.surer's Repon for Mmrch 2007 (ADM 2007-37)
2
Ruoilition 2001.29.Approving Petty Cllsh Policy - ourhori:e
11f#!
Mayor alld Ciry Cltrk
10 UtlC"ttl
(ADM 2001-38)
J
Ordinance 2007.39 • Amending Ordinance 1994.91 - Providing for thCllmposilion of a
Garbase:lfld Reruse Pick.Up SurchlUge - Chance 10 Sun:hOlfgt Amounl -
allr/ror~el"e
MQ)'OI" and City
Clcrlr '0
UUUle
(ADM 2007...(0)
" Sponsorship Request for the OptimiS! Club -
autlrorce WQi";"gpurk Itlrlal
fa
alld pro.ide
;,,-kind
houra
frOIn
Park
and
RrcrtoliOll Dtport",elJl
(CC 2007-G5)
S
Approval of Hislorical Street N;une (CC 2001-06)
• Barbn loan Groesell
b Ralph and Allene Blake
6 AppmYII ofHonor8l)'StrecI NlUTItJ - Nomil\luion or Founding Fathers
by
HRC: Ddbert
Trvmmel, Wayne larson, Russ Hu;hes, Bill Randals and Richard Mitchell (CC 2007-07)
Mlyor Bunl enltnained a
motion
to mppml'e
the
Consent AGenda as presenled So
mo~ed
by
Alderman Golinski; seconded by Alderman Spean
Motion approved by a roll call VOle
A~s-I
NaYli..{)
lulie-lye, Munns-aye., Plochcl-D)"t, SpearS-Dye,
Sulcliff_a)'l:, Werderich-lIye, Besco-aye, Golinski-aye
PLANNING COMMISSIONflONING 130ARD OF APPEAL
No report
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
Th~
Minule'S of
Ih~
Rteul"r M«liol:.
orln~
Cil,'Couneil Mll" 8. 2007 pnge 3
MJJ\'VIES fOR APPROVAL
A moL ion
~-as m~de
by Alcknn3ll
Spe~J"5
10 approve !he minules of
th~
Cily Couocil meetings or
March 13,2(1)7 and March 21, 1001; sceonckd
by
AldcrmiUI Be5CO
Motion
approved
by a vi..... voce Vale
A motion
w,u
~
by
Aldenn:m
Spears
10 app1O\'etI'Ic minutes or the Commi"ee of tlte Whole
mcclin&5 or M:ueh 20, 2001 ;md April
J,
2001; seconded by Aldennan Bcsco
Alderm:ln
Gohns~i
nOled Dlypographical crl'tN"
on
~&e
6 orlhe April 3, 2007 minutcs;
"A!derm:ln" Crois
should be correclI:d 10
~Adminislr:I\Of'"
Crois
Motion approved by a viva I'OCC Vale
PILLS FOR APPROVAL
A
mOlion was mnde by Alderman Spe:ll'S to applovc thc paying orthe bills listed 0fI11lc Detailed
Bonrd Report dated April 25, 2007 lotaling lhe following amounlS: cltecks in the amount of
$790,326 13 (vendols - revised
512107
-
sec summary); $223,410 54 (payroll period eliding
4/1M07);
for n tOlal of $1 ,013,746 67 (lOla1); seconded by Alderman Besco
MOlion approved by II roll call vote
Ayes-S Nays-O
MU'1ns-nyc, Ploc:ltcr-:lye, Spc;l.rS-n}'c, Sutcliff-:lye,
Werde/icn-aye,
Bcsco-aye, Golinski-aye, L.eslie-ayc
REPORTS
MAYOR'S
REPORT
M:lJorPro Tem (01 FY
07108
Mayor Burd reported 1M
in
the past the mayor pro tern has
bern
selcaed by seniolity and
Alderman Munl\$ would be lhe next
~idalc
A mOlion "-:IS !Mde
by
Alderman Besco fOl Aklmnan Munns '0 be mayor pro tern; JCCOnded by
Aldennan Spears
Motion oppro\'cd by 0 roll
~U
yole
Ayes-. Nays-<l
Be5CD-aye, Leslie-aye, Golinski-aye, Wc/delich-aye,
Munns-aye, Plocher-aye, Spears-aye,
SUlelifT-aye
Apl'0iDlmentof City AllOI ney
Mayor
Burd i"C'ported that she would like 10 appoint Mike Roth from Wildman, Horrold, Allen
and Dillon to be Ihe inlerim city IIltomey She enlcrtnined 0 mOlion to accept this firm" She
indicalcd thal thc City Councilltad information before lhem and lhis will be for the short-tcrm
She
elfplaincd lhal she Itad interviewed several finns ond rellthis One would besl suit Yorkville's
short-term
needs She noted lltal Anomey Roth was the fonner city llltorney fOl" the City of
Napcrville
and she asked for 'hcCity Council's VOte of confidence So movcd by Alderrnlln
Munns; seconded by Alderman Ploclx::r
Alderman Munns questioned if Attorney Roth's fees would be complll':lbleto thO.5C p;lid lhe
preyious city at10rney Altomey Roth expl:lined th:lllhc ploposal is fOl" a fixed numbel or hours,
slarting
al SO hOUr! per marlin, for a rL;l:ed fee
Aidelmlll\
Be$co
questioned if the budget needed 10 be odjusled 10 lICCOfTlmodale Allomey ROlh's
fees finmce Di,ectOl" Mika stated that polcnlially il may oec:d 10 be adjusted Adminisualor
Crois inditalcd that adjuslments: Clll\ be made 01 the sill month review of the budget
Mayor Burd indicated thatlhis is fIOl for"the long-term and she envisioned thai a c;ommll1ee of
four oldennen would be establis!ted 10 interview firms .tIer it has been clctel1llincd if a full 01
p:u1-time al10rncy is needed
Aklcnnan Leslie asked whDt the time frame WlS for the oppointmenl Mayor Burd indicaled that
il was open-ended lll\d eoukl be croded alllllY lime
BOlh Aldelmen leslie:and Spears felt the finn WIlS "good e:hoiee
Motion approved by a 1011
~n
vote
Ayes-B NllYS-O
Leslie'llye:,Golinski-Dye, Werdcrich-aye, Munns-aye,
Plocher-aye, Spears-aye, Sutcliff-Dye, Beseo-aye
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
Ih~
l\1;n"l£1 nr lilt
R~c.ul:lf
Meel;n! nr Ihe Clty 'Dgneil Mav
Ii,
2001
pllce 4
Kenllal! Markelplllce Parmenlllnll Priolil),
Al:~emenl
(CC 2001-01)
M;I)'Of Su/d ul.:ed i( anyone wornled to Irulke:l motion 10 opprove the Kendall M:ukelp\.Dco
P;I)'TIll.'nl:and Prioriry Al'eement
A motion
""OIS
m:Mle
by
Aldemwr B= 10 :rpPfove lhe form of
.~eement
for Kendall
Mart;elplDCl.' MplI)'Illef1ll1nd Prioriry
AlV~mcnlM
berween the Oevt'loper(Dnnonball, llC)
Kohl's, Tar&ct, Home Depot, the Lender:and the Cil)', u presented, subjeet 10 stoff:and legal
review
:rnd 10 1I\llhori:= lhe MII)'OI"10 lllI;eCUle the finlll form of the Agreement; seconded by
Alderm3n
Leslie
Motion Ilpproved by a roll call VOle
Ayes,S Nays-O
Golinsld-aye,
Werdel ich'lIye, Munnl-o)'fl, Ploeher-aye,
Spears'Dye,
SUlcliff-IIYC, BeSeD-3Yc, Leslic-Dye
City Adminishlltor $:Illlly Range
(CC 2007-09)
Mllyor
Burd uked for II mOlion 10 approve the CiLy Adminislmlor rccfuitment posling
$Ill~ry
mnge 10 be increased 10 S 130,000
OO/~lIr
based on review of lhe posilion She reponed lhllilhe
levicw indicated tl1:lt bigh-end city administrlllorS gel up to Ihis Dmount and the Citr ":lilts 10
flttTllCl the btighleslond best
A mOlion
was
mode by AldcrmiUI L.eslie to lIpprove Ciry Attorney R«:roitment PostinG Sallll}'
Range
to SI30,ooo 00; seconded
by
Alde/mlln Welderieh
Aloomlln Bcseo ru"e:d if the budget would hllve to be IldjuSlcd 10 IIIXomplim this Finaoce
Dlrcclor
Mib Slated
that
illMy potentilllly MYC 10 be IdjU5led ItO\ycyer some Y:K:3n<:ies lMy
.fTcetlhls
Aldel1lllln Munns asked wltal the low end of the lante was Assistanl City AdministratOl Olson
explained that there
is
no low range and th:ll the poSlin& wilt slate a salary ofS130,OOO 00, plus
Of
minus
Aldcnnan Spears asked
if
the cdue::ttional
degll~e
of the ciry
IIdmini~lr.IlOJ1;
in olher communitieS
wete illvestigated Mr Olson stated thll.l his in\'cstlplion revealed WIll. bachelor'sdepee W/IS
the minimum requirement wilb;l master'slkgree preferred bIlt
nol
required Aldelman Spears
fell !hal (Of S130,OOO OO/)'car she would be more eomfortllble with a dry GdminiSlriltor who hod 11
mflSter's degree Mayor Burd slllied thlllthe intention is lhat in order fo' the candid:tte 10 get the
high end oflhe
~llII')',
they would hllve to have lOp qU:lliflClltions AJdermlln Spe3lS stilted lhllt
she would
IlkI.' so sec the job posting changcd 10 indie:lle tll:llihe master's
de~ee
is rcquil1ld
Aldennlll1
Golinski askcd if the increflSe WflS recommended by the hiring eonsullanlllnd Mr
Olson slllied lhal he did discuss lhe incrcnse with them ilnd they agreed with
it.
nlere W:lS some discussion on holY Ihc posting should read am! the increase of Ihe mnge
Motion approved by 1I roll call vote:
Ayes-S NlIys-2 Present-l
Werdedeh-Ilye, Munns-aye, Plocher-aye, SpellfS_nDY,
SUleIifT-aye, Besco-presenl, L.cslie.ayc, Golinski-nay
Committee/Commission Appolntmenl
Mayor BUld indicated lhat the ehllirmansbip ortlle cornmittl:C's would be est.llblished
by
seniority The senior IIldcrmcn picked chaiTTTWlship:s lind the outcome WIlS;
o AldCf1'll3n Spears - Public Safety Committee
o
AldenTWI Munns - Admini$tratioll
Commi~e
o
Alde,man BestO - Public Works Committee
o
Aldennllll Leslie - Ec:oDomie Development Commiul:C
The
rc:mainina altkTmen picked viee-clTairmanships based on seniority:
o
Alderman Golinski - Economic Development Committee
o
Alde/mlln
Wetdcllch - Public Safety Committee
o
Aldennlln Plocher _ AdminislJotion Commilll:C
o
Aidennllll SutclifT. Public Worb Commillee
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
The Millyl" pf the
R£glll~r
Meeting or lh£ Cjly Coundl-
M~r
8, 2007 '!:lgC S
Ancr some di$CUssion the following 5CIU
on
I:Olnmillecs wel1l delennined 10 be:
o Adminislrillion Committee -Aldcnnro Spc;us.md Werdcrich
o Economic Development Ce-nmittee - A[dennen MulUtS md Besco
o
Public Safety Commillec - Aldcnnen Golinski and Aldelmiln Sutcliff
o
Public WO!'ks Committcc - Aldermen Leslie.OO Ploc:her
Poppy AWlrenc.ss O')'S
M3Y~"
Burd le3d il proc:l:lffi3lion for Poppy Awa.reness 03YS, MOlY 17, ISand 19,2007 (see
.:lttached)
She llSked for a I'Ole of ratificalion of the prochmlGlion lind it \\'ilS nppJOycd
by
I'i,'.:l
voce vOle
CITY COUNCIL REPORT
No report
AITORNEY'S REPORT
No report
CITY CLERK'S REI'ORT
Appoinlment of Deputy Clerk
Clerk Milscl\ewski requested il motion to ilppJOVIl Office Assistant tis.. Pickering:lli Deputy
Clerk
for the ncxt riscill ycilr So movcd
by
Alderman Spill",; seconded
by
AldermGn Golinski
Motion
approved by a roll
~ll
vote
Ayes-I N.:l)'S-O
Ploc.her-aye, Spears-;ayc, Sutcliff-aye, Besco-aye,
Leslie..ye,
GolinskHye, Werdench.•ye.
Munns~
CITY TREASURER'S REPORT
Treasurer Powell reported that
bank
signature
cuds
will be .v.iI.ble 10 be signed Giler the new
aldermen receive their sipalure stAmps He
indi~tcd
Ihat untillhis is
done,
none of the IICWIy
eleo::led aldcnnen can sign
c~k5
CITY ADMINISTATOR'SREPQRT
Norep9fl
FINANCE DIRECTOR'SREPORT
Director Mika repor1ed Ihat she distributed new budgel
p~ckels
10 the City Council
pmECIOR Of PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
No report
CHIEF OF
COLlet'SREPORT
ChjefM~rtin
reported thai
~
new police officer will be hired by June
S,
2007 ilnd
sworn
in Ihe
following
TuesdilY
DmECIOR
OF
PARKS
&.
RECREATION'S REPORT
No report
COMMUNITY pEyELOPMENT DffiECIOR'SRErOR
No repon
COJl,fJ\fUNITY RELATJO!"S "'tANAGER'SREPORT
No report
COMMVNlD' &
LIAiSON BEPORT
No
repol1-
COMMITTEE REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE REPORT
No report
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMJITEE REPORT
OrdinGnce 2007- 40
Approving II Ret.levclopmelll AgrccmeDl for tile
DowntD'Vft
Redevelopmenl Project Areo.
(EDC 1007.j7)
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
The Minllics lIr lilt Rtglllar Meeting (lr Ihe Cirv Cnundl M:w 8, 2007 nllg' 5
A motion was made
by
Alderman l.eslie 10 approve an ordinance Ilpproying a Redel'elopment
Agreement for the Do"Tltown Redeyelopmenl Project; seconded by Aldennan Munns
MOlion approyed by a roll call vote
Ayes-S Nays-O
Spears-aye, SutcUrr-llye, Besco-aye, Leslie-aye,
Golinlki-ayc, Weldcrieh-ayc, Munns-aye, Plocher-aye
PllBUC SAfETY COMMITTEE REPORT
Norepor1
ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Norepon
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Burd enler10ined 0 Illation 10
E~ccutil'c
Seuion 10 discuss manners of pl:nding liligalion
Shellsked lhllllhe Cily Anomey and Anolney Knmcr be jll(:luded So mo\'ed by Alderman
Wcrdl:lieh; seconded by Aldelman Munns
MOlion
approved by a rotl ealt YOle
Ayes-B Nays-O
Spears-ayc, SUlcliff-aye, Werdelieh-aye, Besco-aye,
Oolinsld-aye,leslie-a)'e, Munns-aye,
Plocher-a)'e
The City Council
entered in to
E:<ccuth~
Session at I: 10
p
m
The City
COllncilrclum~
10 regulll' seuion al 8:-15 p III
ADJOURNMENT
MIl)'ol Burd enlertained a mOlion to Ildjoum So moved by AldemHI./1 Munns; scconded by
Alderman
Beseo
MOlion approved by a viva Yoce YOle
Meeting adjourned III 8;45 P M
Minutes submined by;
Jacquelyn Milsel1ewski,
Cily Clelk City ofYOlkYiI!e, Illinois
."Tllpc malfunctioned - barely audible
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
EXHIBITB
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
But I know Larry's a rnan of cllaracter.
He
has
19
dealt with a lot of these. 'l'he experiences he has
had is firsthand
knowled~e.
I have ro respect
hi~
opinion.
r know a lot of people aren't going to
agree wi th that.
I
also know there is a record of
many seated officials here that have made
statements or been involved with the oppoaition
and that -- I think that's going to make them look
bad when the Pollution Control Board gets to the
review this and I think some have shown bias.
1 wanted my opinion on the record,
and that is that we should never have been given
the -- we should never have been the responsible
party to judge this.
The county shouldn't have
been lhe responsible party to judge this. TIle
pollution Control Board should have that
authority, so vote as you may.
Lheir hands any....'Ll.y.
Thank you.
IL will be up in
MAYOR BURD:
Do we have any other
comments? Aldermen Spears, did you have more that
you
wanted to say tonight?
MS. SPEARS:
Yes, but I'm still
preparing
it'".
Kobody else is speaking? You have
20 minutes.
Okay,
thank you.
And I would like to
,
,
'.
DepocourL Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
EXHIBIT
B
C1B610
UCYFM005170
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
20
conditions?
other direct jon.
if we could include additional conditions in our
I would like to know aL Lhis time
It has
1 asked why. noL
I would like to have
We can't hear you.
It got dirty among the
Again, I just -- just
Some of us were accused of
1 know on the onset of this I waG
And I was also told t.hat he is a very
MS. SPEARS:
Okay.
It
h~5
been a very long process.
AUDIENCE MEMBER:
MS. SPEARS;
MR. ROTH: State the conditions you feel
that close.
him, which I find to be a150 biased going the
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
it did get pretty dirty.
being biased.
to agree with alao Alderman BeBeo. There were --
aldermen as well.
also asked to WOrk with Donny.
wanted to thank everybody for sitting through this
been very difficult on all of us, and I would like
resolution? Could we include additional
with
us.
d18u Ltlank everybody who has been in attendance
and who has presented facts and statistics.
are appropriate.
good person and I think that we should work with
klluwing who Donny was, because I'm obviously not
•
1
2
3
,.
•
07: 25PM
5
6
7
T'
L
•
9
p
•
•
•
07,25PM
10
l
J
I
.~
11
,
I
.
12
13
14
07:26PM
15
16
,
,
.
19
,.
17
h
07: 26PM
20
I
•
21
I
,
22
I
,
I
23
•I
j ...
2.
,
!
C18611
UCYFM005171
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
21
cOlldiLion -- a series of :onditions that if --
And so I thillk
it'~
in that context that you are
clear, for the benefit of the audience probably
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
Yes, it is.
I just want to be
Yes.
And I would like to
l~mit
Wasn't there also denial
No.4.
We had prepared two different
fillye.
Okay.
MR. ROTH:
MR. ROTH:
MR. MUNNS:
MS. SPEARS:
Is this okay?
MR. MUNNS:
MS. SPEARS:
MR. ROTH:
there it
.1:::1.
more than anyone else, that the statute cal.9 for
with approvals -- with conditions?
the hours of operation fronl 6:00 a.nl. to
resolutions in anticipation of the City
Counci~'s
a condition regarding t.he -- changing the hours of
noon.
resolution that we prepared as a lliatter of form a
denial, approval with conditions, or approval.
weekdays.
Saturdayo would be 6; 00 a. m. until
speaking?
4:30 p.m., and on Saturdays -- that would be
decision tonight, and we had included in a denial
operation.
1
2
3
,
"
.
,
,
"
.
.
07:2EPH
5
•
7
r
I ,
•
9
n
07,21PM
10
11
12
13
14
,.
07: 27PH 15
, .
.
I
,
,.
17
,8
19
07:27PM
20
21
22
II.
23
I'
2'
I
I
C18612
UCYFM005172
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
22
And 1 want to be clear that that ia
Lhat the pollution Control Board or a court were
of one of the denial reaolutinnR that in the event
LO reverse and send this matter back to the City
If
it
I'm Borry.
I had the second
We had stated a cond1tion or a term
MR. ROTH:
Right.
matter back to the City Council for approval, that
were required
by
a higher authority to send this
it be approved only with certain conditionD.
Council. that conditions would be imposed.
one.
J
2
3
,
"
.
•
01,26PH
5
•
7
, 'I
8
; ,
.
.
,,
07,28PM 10
•
MS. SPEARS: That's correct.
io wtlOt would stand and that would be with the
MR. ROTH:
Thank you.
have property value protection extended to a
I would also like
~o
That i9 the one that I am
Well protect ton extended to a
I would like the removal
ot
It is only in the event that if it
MS. SPEARS:
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
were reLurned by the pollution Control Board or a
resolution denying the proposal, that that denial
lO-mile radius.
court Lhat that condition would take place.
~ddressing
at this time.
City Council.
event it does deny Lilis and were to adopt the
not speaking to the City Council's decicion in the
IO-mile radius.
! I
11
12
13
<-
"
07:28PM
15
I
I.
17
18
"
07,28PM
20
, ,
21
,,
22
23
,
~,
2'
! I
!
C18613
UCYFM005173
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
23
radius.
tribuLdries.
ne ..... design.
would like the landfill to be redesigned and the
ROBP., can 1 address one of
1 would like no further
I would like the applic311L to pay
Bear ..... ith me ..... hile 1 find my other
MR. BESCO:
Please atop the clock, l'n nOl speaking.
A}so in the case of not removing
I would like to tlave quarterly
traffic traveling through downtown Yorkville. No
I would like no garbage
truc~
whcthe~
that be by an addendum or whether it Just
be in an agreement witll this.
if it i9 not removed and this
doe~
return to us, I
Sleepy 110110"" Road from the annexatioll agreement,
requesL.
city and county road impact fees based on tile
Plainfield.
tesLing of private O(f-81te wells within a
10~mile
attempt to move Hollenbeck Creek or any
number of haulers.
truck traffic traveling through downtown
Sleepy Hollow Road from the annexation agreement,
City would have the sole right of approval of the
your points in-between before I forget it?
"
1
2
J
,..
, .;
•
, !
Oi:291'M
5
6
7
:1
8
:i
9
n
0-': 29PM
10
l1
n
11
..
12
i
13
B
07,29Pfol
15
,
,
16
! .
L7
18
,.
,
19
I .
07, JOPM
20
2L
22
I
23
I'
,
,
,
'
2.
I
DepoCourt ReporLing Service (630) 983-0030
C18614
UCYFM005174
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
2.
method of enforcement. And -- or the alternate,
the courta of competent jurisdiction.
the sole remedy in the event of a claim violation
that tile City shall have the sole right and
I
okay.
This is one
It
further seems
I would recommend
I would recommend that
No. hold your
~hought.
Binding arbitration.
I would like to be inrluded as a
I~
is in my conditions folder.
MS. SPEARS:
Lhe parties not agree that bindirlg dLLitration is
by the City or its citizells.
that I think these hearlugs alone will support my
unconditional and guaranteed in payment where the
very clear that the county agreement is
it would be much better for the city to have the
ability if it is traveling down this path to have
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
In other words, what I'm trying to
a guaranteed revenue source.
City is contingent, and from a point of bUSJ.ness
that the City may have injunction
rel~ef
through
apologize.
condition, guarantee of payment.
condition recommendation.
election to choose binding arbitration as to the
presented, I would like them to be ruled on by
say is if there are any problems that are
c-
2
.
-
3
I
!
4
n
07:31PM
5
.
'
•
, .
7
fl
8
,
I ,
9
I .
,
'
u'"
.JlIJH
10
I'
11
,.
12
! .
..
,
,
.
13
I.
,
"
,
07,lJ.PM
15
..
,
"
1._'
,.
17
18
19
07,32PM
20
I
,
,
,
I
i
I
2122
I'
23
2.
I
I
C1B61S
UCYFMOOSI7S'
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
25
As far as arbiLLdtion. I would like
would be held harmless for any claim for ilny
I would like to see at least a 2S-year escrow
name -- and this is all in the hosL agreement --
Third party
T would like to
I would like to
And my fear is if there is
Okay.
Alao for a post-closure plan
Devaluation of property, third party.
l'm not comfortable with that.
reason.
to remove every reference between city and
is in agreenlent with that as well.
arbitrator.
have our court system handle any type of
If another is named as a tllird party, then insert
that we have a very close. lighL-knit circle of
people that represent either side in various
Kendall COUllty, the county that ..... e live in.
I
or pursue Lhe revenues in our court.
would be required arlee closure.
attorneys that have been here on either cide. and
landfill applications.
drbitration. any complaint.
and
I hope our Council
account to maintain the landscaping and whatever
tllink tllat it is very apparent from these hearillgs
some killd of arbitration, it may be one of the
also have included an irrigalion plan. And r
1
2
,
..
,
•
r
\1-':
32flM
5
6
,
7
"
8
: ;
9
..1
,
07:)3 ..... 10
.,
r'
11
I ,
l2
.;
13
07,33PM
15
"'
16
17
18
;
19
I.
07,33PM
20
21
22
23
•
24
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18616
UCYFM005176
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
LdL}ler
difficult.
Lhat the liner -- that the liners are tesled not
26
Mr. Woodman indicated dS his traffic Wlrness.
I'm typically a
I also would like tu make sure
And this is pretty close La what
I apologize again.
Also I would like to see the design
it to Kendall County.
And, oh, yes, also we would like Lo
critical areas.
binder last night until 4 o'clock this morning was
them tesLed. the entire liners. in case there are
Lons per day.
illclude two layers of HOPE in the entire, the
little more organized but reading that whole
would
lik~ ~o
have the tonnage lim1ted to 4,000
limit the service area and we would like to lirrit
entire, liner system. not only
ill
what is deemed
only at the weld oeams but I would like to see
.,
,
I
1
2
)
,
'
•
01.J4PH
5
6
7
n
8
"
9
"
, .
10
I
J
01: JSPM
I-
II
12
l)
1.
07,36PM 15
,
,
,
.
16
17
18
19
t-.l
07: J/iiPH
20
i'
21
22
,
I
, I
23
!
2'
,
'-
~
fac~ory
defects or damage during the
install~tion.
Also, regarding the tanks. the
storage tanks that are going t9 be buried, first
of all I would prefer they are not buried and,
second, I would like to include as a condition
that we use -- the proper tanks would be included
in this design. and they would be the welded steel
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C1B617
UCYFM005177
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
,1
27
standard _
Also I would like ro havp. Romp
in. the private wells, and the wells t.h.;tt. will be
I believe I l,ave like five minutes
Thank you.
I would like to propose
(Aopplause. )
Thank you, Rose.
MAYOR BURD:
Thank you, Alderman Spears.
MAYOR SURD:
MR. WEDBRICH:
1 would like to see that IlloniLored and on
landfill, including post-closure care period. t.hat
And also I would like to
~nclude
as
the run-oCr [rom the wheel-wash basin and
protection. that I mentioned last night. as Car as
groundwat.er protection plan -- let's see. oh, that
tanks built A-W-W-A D dash 100 or the A-P-I 650
we protect all of the wells Within, again. a
area.
IO-mile
rddiu~.
dll etla wells tlldt are currently
a condition that during the entire life of the
scormwater that would be falling in the paved
a -- on a daily basis.
every issue at this time.
Who would likp. to speak next?
left, correct? And I believe that I did address
installed durinq the operation of the plant.
1
2
3
•
01;
)1!"M
5
•
7
B
9
07 .l7PH
10
11
12
13
1.
071l81'M
,.
15
17
18
19
07:J8Pf1l
20
21
22
23
2<
••
,
n
II
, ;
,
I '
i _'
1
,
..
, ,
,
I
I
,
,
I
! I
q
OepoCcurt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18618
UCYFM005178
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
MR. PLOCHER;
I also have two additicnal
will read the things now so we don't have to do it
them will end I will be a senior citizen.
ll~uJlitoring
well s installed before opening the
28
I would like
Who would like to
That's it.
The first one being
Okay.
I
have one additional and
I
Yes.
As far as Criterion 2, I
MAYOR SURD:
MAYOR SURD:
Okay.
MR. MUNNS:
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
Gpeak next?
Alderman Munns?
proposed resolutions, about not doing this until
the operator of the landfill be completely and
that I would like to see on there.
the Prairie Parkway and Eldemain Road bridges
tlpping fees. and also 1 would like to Dee all
to see a $10 million a year flat fee instead of
notice a couple of places in the resolution, the
1a
ter.
two additional conditione.
operation, cUIlsidering at 25 years before allot
that the height of the landfill be reduced to 50
feet, ann the second one being that the owner and
going over -- over Bldemain Road over the river.
accurately idelltified pursuant to Criteria 9.
That would be all of tllem.
,
,
,
1
2
..
3
, ,
•
!
: ;
.
07,39PM
,
,
'
6
7
r~
8
i- I
9
I
f'
J
01:39PM
10
f'
11
,
t-
,
,
12
l ;
13
,.
01:40PM 15
16
17
18
r
t
.,
07:40PM
20
19
I
I
:
'
21
I I
22
I ,
23
l ,
2.
,
, ,
U
,
C18619
UCYFM005179
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
29
situatioll due to its multi-faceted character.
interoection already.
RouLe 34 betwppn Cannonball and Eldemairl. that
The
The procedure of
IL is widely accepted that in every
This is about the whole process.
DepoCourL Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18620
Many communities have faced extreme
Landfill siting permitting and appropriateness are
if tl,ere is any other better ways to go, because
criterion.
the siting process must therefore illclude
problem in our country today.
too
~uch
truck traffic
goi~g
through LIlat
I have a quick little statement.
1 would like to put a condition that, you know,
the most contelltious part of the solid wasLe
evaluated in order to make a proper decision and
Lhe decision.
Again, this isn't new information about the
that's whaL they are asking us to do.
qualified scientists coming from different fields
such as geology, engineering, planners, etcetera.
landfill siting process composes a very complex
political conflicts centered on who should make
before truck traffic goes down Eldemain and
All evidence from this field must be compiled
~nd
with the Menards truck traffic there is just way
.
.
.,
..
,
,
1
>
3
,.
t;
•
"
07 .40P/'l
5
6
;i
7
p
8
I,
•I
9
Ii
07:41PM 10
I ,
11
I
12
13
14
07:4JPH 15
,
16
l
17
18
.
,
~
'
19
l,
07:41PM
20
•
l i
21
I,
22
I,.
23
,
I
.
'
2.
I .
; .
,
II.
;
I
UCYFM005180
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
30
decil'lion-making process the extracted results <:Ire
cllaracterized by the stakeholders' objectivity.
The real quP,At. i on is who should be
stakeholders in Kendall CounLy.
The mosL common
type of siting process is to decide. announce. and
defend a model which hasn't been accepted easily
by interested parties and local citizens have
demanded to be included in the process to have a
more comprehensive strategy.
And. after all,
we
aLe all ciLizens of Yorkville and have the same
vested illterest to site it or not.
The erltire process is really unfair
to counties and municipalities.
We
are. for the
most part, average citizellS witll expertise in
other areas than geology and traffic.
Ask me
about my main busineos or the sports I officiate
and r will give you definitive opinions. very
cnnfident and correct opinions. and argue them
with anybody.
I believe right is right and
wron~
is wrong, but in this case I
I
m just making the
bese decision with what I have to work with, which
is a layman's knowledge of some very technical
subject matter. After reading thousands of pages
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18621
UCYFM005181
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
31
would have liked Lo hear it coming from ehe
It seemed ludicrous too that tlle
do not hold the same emotion as speaking. and I
be a moot point.
We should have been
If we don't do the process correctly,
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
And my final thought is that after
we have varying opinions froUl
people, not just reading a piece of paper where
by ttle petitioner, and I don't think that makes
hearings. over 30 sitings as testified, isn't here
to give his opinion orally.
you can't read in an emotion.
several high-priced attorneys who are being paid
this
is
donp., hopefully we can all act civilly
sense so
I
guess tllat Sllouldn't surprise me.
toward one another, because I have no hard
perSon with the most experience in landfill
d[(orded the same privilege but written statements
that will pfEect many people today and in tile
fucure.
IEPA or other elltities can trump us and allow
these many hours of agonizing over this issue La
sense, which the whole process really didn't make
of dry, boring material and listening to hundreds
of hours of testimony, we must make a decision
1
2
3
4
I
p
.
01 :.:2P'"
,
6
,
I
7
r'
8
l ;
9
Jl
U
01;42PM
10
I'
11
12
I
!,
13
14
01: 43PM
IS
16
17
18
L
19
I;
01:43PM
20
21
22
L
23
24
. ,
,
I ,
C18622
UCYFMOOS 182
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
32
you.
Thank you.
there can be further deliberation on that or you
~e601ution,
and
then the mayor can sign it
p..nd what I would
Obviously morp. has
r would like to entertain a
(Applause. )
Do we have any other
If there is no further
And based upon that in a second,
MR. ROTH:
M.AYOR BURD:
MAYOR SURD:
been sLated tonight and t!10ee resolutiollS. if you
upon what we heard last night.
prepared resolutions for your consideration based
revise the resolutions that we have put before
Agaifl, I want to emphasize that we
feelings toward anyone here
~oni9ht
or after.
mot.ion
recommend is that you vote on one measure or
tomorrow.
another, give us direcLion, we will prepare the
a motion be made for or against or with
conditions.
direct.
w~ll
need to be revised.
comments?
deliberation, then I think it is appropriate that
give us the direction as to how you would like to
1
,
3
4
07:4)~
5
6
,
i'
7
P
8
9
"
l;
01:44PM 10
11
12
13
14
07,44PM
15
16
17
18
l
19
07'44PM
20
l'
21
22
23
24
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18623
UCYFM005183
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
33
comment, and I think it is for the benefit of the
MAYOR BURD:
We have a second?
Alderman
conditions is to -- is to allo"" for reasonable.
restricr1ons, including all new restrictions.
And 1 can
This is the
Mayor, if I may make a
It is the siting
T would like LO make a
Do I have a second?
There 1.s three.
While we will certainly
Is this the middle ordirlance
Yes.
Yes.
Could we have discussion. please.
So there are certain things that I
MR. ROTH:
the denial with conditions?
MAYOR BURD:
MR. PLOCHER:
MR. MUNNS:
MR. WEDERICH:
Second.
MR. MUNNS:
MR. ROTH:
wrote,
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
reopccL whatever direction you give us, I think
moL ion to approve the denial resolution with
you
thaL would not be permissible by law.
tell you thaL the purpose of establishing
meet the Biting criteria.
you need to be careful abouL setting conditions
Wederich. okay.
city in the process.
necessary, and appropriate conditions in order Lo
tl:iddle one of the three?
thillk are out of the jurisdiction of tile city to
criteria _
1
2
3
4
01:44PM
5
•
7
8
•
01,4SPM 10
11
12
13
14
07:4SPH
15
1.
17
18
1.
07: 45""
20
21
22
23
L
24
,
, '
.
li
,.
I
r
n
.
I 1
,
,
'
,
I
"
I
I ,
i
I
I
C1B624
UCYFM005184
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
that I want to be clear about.
area be limiLed to Kendall County, if that's not
include
~hem
in the resolution that you arc
But
1
want to caution you against having this
So to make a -- set a condition, for
•
Now, that doesn't mean that if you
Second, the courts hdve evaluated
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
that's appropriate.
the sLandard of what is reasonable and dppropriaee
wildt the petitioner has so directed, I don'e think
One, it is the petitioner's or the
condiLions, and they have -- they have considered
lhaL established extraordinarily high financial
example. that
tll~
City limits -- that Lhe service
condition.
against a condition, for example, that sets a
matter quickly sent back based upon certain
requirements that were not rationally related to
area is and
~t
is not for the city to make that
determination for them, even by way of a
propos~ng.
that that resolution is going to fail.
conditions, and there was a couple of them there
specific siting criteria, so
I
would caution you
applicant'e right to determine what the service
oLher governing bodies in position of conditions
1
determine.
2
3
••
•
r
o/; 'lSI''''
5
;-.
•
7
[l
8
,,
•
"
,
07,4f"YM
10
I ;
11
12
13
H
,
07:46PM 15
17
"
18
!
r
••
,.
01,46PM
20
r
!
21
22
23
L
2.
i .
I'
,
I
C18625
UCYFM005185
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
)5
MR. ROTH:
Yeo.
the resolution to include those tllat I Ilave not
$10 million flat fee.
regardj og Kendall County?
that
That kind of a
May I ask a question
I
think that what I am
So obviously there were a
MR. ROTH:
MS. SPEARS:
MS. SPEARS:
Could
we
say rather Lhan
for itself on that.
that were articulated tonight, dod so 1 understand
And, tinally, certain of these
the host. agreement and the host agreelneot speako
Next, as to the condition that's
members 1ldve spoken about are clearly related to
number of operational. siLing, desigl) conditions
term would be decided by the law and couldll't be
criteria or conditions that you have
recommerlded ellat a court of jurisdiction would
spec~fically
mentioned.
only be included with the court of Kendal] county,
underotanding you to say is that you are speaking
I would caution you against that.
go to a -- it goes to court?
going to an arbitration board, that we could jusL
decided by the City.
"
1
2
)
,
'
4
01,41PM
5
0
7
n
8
9
.,
I ;
07'411'"
10
! :
"
11
12
13
1.
,.
07
,<I
7Pfo\
15
,
I ,
10
, .
17
18
•
"
19
t.
01:
48P!'1
20
21
22
23
I
L
2.
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18626
UCYFM005186
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
,
3.
ordinances.
come back to us to re-discuss or vote?
take a case outside of thia county, and that is
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
•
If this
That would be for
Madam Mayor. r have one
well, it is within the
So it i6 possible, not highly
And, again. what I understand you
MR.. MUNNS:
MR. ROTH:
MS.
SPEARS:
Okay, thank you.
is appealed and it goes to the stale, does it: ever
place to esLablish Lerms for a hOBt agreement.
So. again, the court of
to be speaking to is the host agreement anyway,
~p.rms
of the enforcement of your resolution of
a judge to say.
there are exceptions under the law where it 15
to terms of
~he
hosL agreement rather than to the
and I don't think that this is the appropriate
remanded or tt: could bl:! remanded by order
o~
the
question too on the process for Mr. Rorh.
Pollution Cont:rol Board'o authQrity to remand a
not going to be for us to say.
jurisdiclion is going to be the county court, but
sometimes the right of one party or another Lo
Appellale Court.
case, so it could reverse and then the case could
go directly to the Appellate Court or it could be
1
2
)
4
01 481'H
S
.
,
C"
•
7
f'
8
.
,
,
9
.,
,
01'48PM
10
t:
r
11
,
12
13
14
I i
01;49PH lS
!
~
; ;
1.
17
18
L
19
01,49PM
20
l
21
.
22
I
,
2)
I I!
,
24
i.
•
r
I
I
C18627
UCYFM005187
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
37
MAYOR BURD:
I would like to ask the
MR. MUNNS:
Thank you.
there is a lnotion on the -- well. there is not a
be so that we don't add anything that'S not
to this
So if thaL
And that's the reason that
Yes, there is.
So you recommend keeping
Yes, I do.
If I may suggest -- I think
MR. ROTH:
MR. ROTH:
MR. MUNNS:
MA.YOR
BURD:
would one of you make a motion to amelld?
would be possible, I would like to amend it.
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
resolution to allow the aLLorney to make sure that
required.
Lhey arc in compliance witll WlldL conditions should
allowable that does not pertain to the host
agreement. the annexation agreement, Lhat is not
throwing it all away.
suppoRed to be in this resolution.
aldermen to amend ti,e conditions or
Could
motion on the table yet.
we are recomnlendil19 that i( it dirl, there be a
common but.
it.
is possible, that the matter could
some of this intormation we have illS Lead of
come back to the Cit.y.
clear message as to strong conditions that be
1
2
3
•
07,49PM
5
6
,.
7
Cl
8
!,
.-
•
l
01 49Pl'1
10
,
11
..
I .
12
13
,.
07' 50PM
1>
>
16
L
.
17
•
18
; ,
i
"
07:50PM
20
J
21
,.
22
I
I
23
•
I'
2.
,.
i ,
,
C18628
UCYFM005188
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
3.
MR. ROTH:
There 19.
Excuse me, there
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
of them that pertain to the host agreement, the
our attorney to remove any illegal condiLionB, any
is a matiorl on
~hc
table, that's right.
Is that
Do I have a motion
Do I have a second?
Could we have a roll
Second.
Okay.
The amendment
is
to allow
I'm Borry? What are we --
MAYOR SURD,
Okay.
MR. WEDERICH:
MAYOR BURD:
MS .
PICKERING:
Werderich.
MR.
~1EUERICH
:
Aye.
MS.
PICKERING:
Munns.
MR. MUNNS:
A.ye.
MS.
PICKERING:
Plocher.
MR.
PLOCHER;
Aye.
MS. PICKERING:
SpeClrs.
MS.
SPEARS:
Aye.
MS. PICKERING:
Sutcliff.
MS. SUTCLIFF:
Aye.
MS. PICKERING:
Beaco.
MR. BESCO:
MAYOR 8URD:
to amend? Aldermen Plocher .
all of the conditione that were placed?
callan the amendment?
....hat we are -"-
2
)
•
07,Sll'H
5
6
7
n
~
,
•
9
,
1- .
07:51PM
10
i
1]
"
,
12
13
1.
07:51PM
15
,.
,
17
,.
f-
19
07:51PM 20
21
22
2)
"
! 1
U
2'
I'
,
"
,
..
,
'
C18629
UCYFM005189
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
39
annexation agreement, anything that we cannot
legally ask for.
MR. BESCO:
Right.
Aye.
MS.
PICKERING;
Leslie.
MR. LESLIE:
Aye.
MS.
PICKERING:
Golinski.
MR. GOLINSKI:
Aye.
MAYOR BURO:
All right.
Now we are back
to discussion on the resolution itself.
Does
~nybody
want to speak to the resolution on the
floor? The resc)ution is on the floor with the
appropriate conuitions. so we will move ahead then
with Lhe roll call voLe.
MS. SPEARS:
Excuse me, can you clarity
that one more time for us?
MAYOR DURO;
Okay.
What we ace voting
on is denial
~-
where is il -- denial of siting
application from Fox Moraine. LLC for proposed
landfill in the United City of Yorkville with
conditions. And it has been amended with all the
conditions that were stated here tonight except
those that are illegal and should not be included.
MS. SPEARS:
returned, correct?
And tllat's only if it is
DepoCourt Reporting Service (630) 983-0030
C18630
UCYFM005190
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Pani Racky, a non.attorney. certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing Notice
of Filing and United City of Yorkville's Reply in Support of Its Motion in Limine #
4 to be served upon the Hearing Officer and all Counsel of Record listed on the attached
Service list by sending it via Electronic Mail on October 7, 2008.
/sl
Patti Racki
[xl
Under penalties as provided by law pursuant
\0
ILL. REV, STAT.
CHAP. 110 - SEC 1-109, [ certify that the statements set forth
herein are true and correct.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008
SERVICE LIST
Bradley P. Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James
R.
Thompson Center, Suite 11.500
100 W. Randolph Street
Chicago, Illinois 60601
hallorab@ipcb.statc.il.us
George Mueller
Mueller Anderson, P.C.
609 Etna Road
Ottawa,lllinois 61350
george@muelleranderson.com
Charles Helsten
Hinshaw
&
Culbertson, LLP
100 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 1389
Rockford, JIlinois 61105-1389
chelstcn@hinshawlaw.com
Michael S. Blazer
Jeep
&
Blazer, LLC
24 N. Hillside Avenue, Suite A
Hillside, IL 60162
mblazer@enviroatty.com
Eric C. Weiss
Kendall County Stale's Attorney
Kendall County Courthouse
807 John Street
Yorkville, Illinois 60560
eweis@co.kendall.il.us
James
J.
Knippcn,
II
Walsh, Knippen, Knight
&
Pollock
2150 Manchester Road
Suite 200
Wheaton,
IL 60187
jim@wkkplaw.com
h~tlthl:r
(/\\
~
kplll\\ .l:om
James B. Harvey
McKeown, Fitzgerald, Zollner,
Buck, Hutchison
&
RUHle
24255 Glenwood Avenue
Joliet, IL 60435
jim@mckeownlawfinn.com
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, October 7, 2008