1. Notice of Filing PCB092308
    2. First Amended Petition for Review
      1. First Amended Petition for Review
      2. Resolution 2007-36

 
George Mueller
Mueller Anderson, P.C.
609 East Etna Road
Ottawa, Illinois 61350
(815) 431-1500 – Telephone
(815) 431-1501 - Facsimile
george@muelleranderson.com
Charles Helsten
Hinshaw
& Culbertson LLP
100 Park Avenue
Rockford, Illinois 61101
(815) 490-4900 - Telephone
(815) 490-4901 - Facsimile
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
FOX MORAINE, LLC
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
PCB 07- 146
)
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,
)
CITY COUNCIL
)
)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE OF FILING
To:
See Attached Service List
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on this 23rd day of September, 2008,
George Mueller, one of the attorneys for Petitioner, Fox Moraine, LLC, filed via
electronic filing of the attached
First Amended Petition For Review
with the Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, a copy of which is herewith served upon
you.
Respectfully submitted,
FOX MORAINE, LLC
By:__/s/ George Mueller__________
One of its Attorneys
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

George Mueller
Mueller Anderson, P.C.
609 East Etna Road
Ottawa, Illinois 61350
(815) 431-1500 – Telephone
(815) 431-1501 - Facsimile
george@muelleranderson.com
Charles Helsten
Hinshaw
& Culbertson LLP
100 Park Avenue
Rockford, Illinois 61101
(815) 490-4900 - Telephone
(815) 490-4901 - Facsimile
Fox Moraine, LLC v. United City of Yorkville
PCB No. 07-146
SERVICE LIST
PCB 2007-146
Bradley Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
1000 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
PCB 2007-146
Derke J. Price
Ancel, Glink, Diamond, Bush & Krafthefer
P.C.
140 South Dearborn Street
Sixth Floor
Chicago, IL 60603
PCB 2007-146
Charles Helsten
Hinshaw & Culbertson
100 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 1389
Rockford, IL 61105-1389
PCB 2007-146
Jeffrey D. Jeep
Jeep & Blazer, LLC
24 North Hillside Avenue
Suite A
Hillside, IL 60162
PCB 2007-146
Leo P. Dombrowski
Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon
225 West Wacker Drive
Suite 3000
Chicago, IL 60606-1229
PCB 2007-146
Anthony Hopp
Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon
225 West Wacker Drive
Suite 3000
Chicago, IL 60606-1229
PCB 2007-146
Thomas I. Matyas
Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon
225 West Wacker Drive
Suite 3000
Chicago, IL 60606-1229
PCB 2007-146
James B. Harvey
Buck, Hutchison & Ruttle
2455 Glenwood Avenue
Joliet, IL 60435
PCB 2007-146
Ms Valerie Burd, Mayor
City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
PCB 2007-146
Michael Roth, Interim City Attorney
City of Yorkville
800 Game Farm Road
Yorkville, IL 60560
PCB 2007-146
Eric Weis
Kendall County State’s Attorney
Kendall county Courthouse
807 John Street
Yorkville, IL 60560
PCB 2007-146
James Knippen
Walsh Knippen Knight & Pollick
2150 Manchester Road
Suite 200
Wheaton, IL 60187-2476
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

George Mueller
Mueller Anderson, P.C.
609 East Etna Road
Ottawa, Illinois 61350
(815) 431-1500 – Telephone
(815) 431-1501 - Facsimile
george@muelleranderson.com
Charles Helsten
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
100 Park Avenue
Rockford, Illinois 61101
(815) 490-4900 - Telephone
(815) 490-4901 - Facsimile
chelsten@hinshawlaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Sharon Twardowski, a non-attorney, certify that I served a copy of the
foregoing
Notice of Filing
and
First Amended Petition For Review
to the Hearing
Officer and all Counsel of Record listed on the attached Service list, by sending it
via Electronic Mail on September 23, 2008, before 5:00 p.m.
__/s/ Sharon Twardowski______________
[x]
Under penalties as provides by law pursuant to ILL. REV. STAT.
CHAP. 110-SEC 1-109, I certify that the statements set forth
Herein are true and correct
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

 
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
FOX MORAINE, LLC
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
)
PCB 07-146
)
(Pollution Control Facility Siting Appeal)
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE,
)
CITY COUNCIL
)
)
Respondent.
)
FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR REVIEW
NOW COMES Fox Moraine, LLC (‘Petitioner”) by its attorneys, Charles F.
Helsten and George Mueller, pursuant to §40.1(a) of the Environmental Protection Act
(“the Act”) (415 ILCS 5/40.1(a)) and petitions for review of the decision of the United
City of Yorkville City Council on May 24, 2007, in which it denied the Application of Fox
Moraine, LLC for Site Location Approval of a new pollution control facility, namely a
municipal solid waste landfill located in Yorkville, Illinois. In support of its Petition, Fox
Moraine, LLC states and alleges as follows:
1.
That on December 1, 2006, Petitioner filed an Application with the United
City of Yorkville for site location approval pursuant to §39.2 of the Act of a new pollution
control facility, namely a solid
waste
landfill located in Yorkville, Illinois (the
“Application”).
2.
That a public hearing was held on the Application commencing on March
7, 2007, during which Petitioner proved that the Application satisfied all nine statutory
siting criteria.
3.
That on May 24, 2007, the United City of Yorkville City Council held a
special meeting to consider the Application, and the City Council at that time passed a
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

resolution to deny the Application with conditions. A copy of said resolution #2007-36 is
attached hereto as required by 35 IAC 107.208(a).
4.
The Hearing on the Petition for Site Location approval was not conducted
in accordance with the requirements of §39.2 of the Act and the action of the Yorkville
City Council was not taken in accordance with the requirements of §39.2 of the Act.
5.
The proceedings of the Yorkville City Council, including the public hearing,
post-hearing procedures and the decision making process, as well as the action of the
Yorkville City Council taken on May 24, 2007, were not fundamentally fair for the
following reasons:
A.
The Yorkville City Council failed to comply with its local pollution
control facility siting ordinance and said non-compliance rendered the proceedings
fundamentally fair.
B.
The Hearing procedures employed by the Yorkville City Council
were not fundamentally fair.
C.
The post-hearing proceedings employed by the Yorkville City
Council were not fundamentally fair.
D.
The decision making procedures employed by the Yorkville City
Council were not fundamentally fair.
E.
Multiple members of the Yorkville City Council were biased against
Fox Moraine, LLC and prejudged the Application.
F.
Multiple members of the Yorkville City council had disqualifying
conflicts of interest.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

G.
The action of the Yorkville City Council was not based upon the
evidence.
H.
The action of the Yorkville City Council was based on matters
outside the record, including ex parte contacts by siting opponents and so called
“independent research” by several council members
I.
The Yorkville City Council disregarded the recommendation for
approval of the Hearing Officer and its own technical staff and adopted findings which
were in direct conflict with the findings of its technical and professional staff.
J
.
Objectors to the Application including, but not limited to,
participants Kendall County and Friends of Greater Yorkville engaged in prejudicial ex
parté contacts with the members of the Yorkville City Council.
K.
The Yorkville City Council applied a fundamentally unfair and
incorrect burden of proof
L.
The Mayor of Yorkville, although not voting on the Application,
campaigned for office on the basis of opposing the Application and spear headed a
movement to defeat the Application. Her opposition to the Application was for political
gain and not related to the evidence.
M.
The decision of the City Council was based upon promises made
and political considerations related to the municipal election, which took place while the
public hearings on the Application were in progress.
N.
The public hearing on the Application, the hearing procedures and
the decision making process were otherwise fundamentally unfair.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

6.
The finding of the Yorkville City Council that Fox Moraine, LLC had not
proven siting criteria 1, ii, iii, v, vi, viii and ix was against the manifest weight of the
evidence as to each criterion. Additionally, the purported finding by the Yorkville City
Council that numerous conditions should be imposed if siting is achieved by reversal or
remand from the IPCB was not supported by the evidence, and is contrary to law.
7.
The Yorkville City Council made findings which are inconsistent with
denial of the application.
8.
On May 24, 2007, the Yorkville City Council passed a Resolution which
stated in pertinent part that its action was based upon “the reasons stated at the Special
Meetings of the Yorkville City Council held on May 23 and May 24, 2007.”
9.
Attached to the Resolution was a transcript of the proceedings of May 23
and May 24, 2007. Those proceedings are in the nature of public deliberations where
individual council members expressing opinions about the evidence. Theses opinions
varied from council member to council member. No single opinion or group of opinions
was ever adopted as a Finding of the Council, and in fact no vote was ever taken to
adopt any particular opinion. Accordingly, there are no “reasons”, within the meaning of
that term as used in 415 ILCS 5/39.2(e) which were ever adopted. Additionally, the
reference in the city resolution to “reasons” is entirely illusory.
10.
The aforesaid resolution also states affirmatively that the City Council
reviewed a report from counsel for the city staff and the hearing officer’s report and
recommendations when the record affirmatively demonstrates that these documents
were not reviewed by a number of city council members.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

11.
The Resolution submitted as the alleged decision of the City Council does
not reflect the actual intent of council members and is not their decision.
WHEREFORE, Fox Moraine, LLC prays that the action of the Yorkville City
Council denying Fox Moraine, LLC’s Application for Site Location Approval be reversed
or, alternatively, that he same be remanded with instructions to correct fundamental
fairness errors including, but not limited to, removal of those Yorkville City Council
members who had conflicts of interest, were biased or otherwise prejudged the
Application from further consideration of the matter.
Respectfully submitted,
FOX MORAINE, LLC
BY:__/s/George Mueller______
GEORGE MUELLER
One of Its attorneys
George Mueller
Mueller Anderson, P.C.
609 East Etna Road
Ottawa, Illinois 61350
(815) 431-1500 – Telephone
(815) 431-1501 - Facsimile
george@muelleranderson.com
Charles Helsten
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
100 Park Avenue
Rockford, Illinois 61101
(815) 490-4900 - Telephone
(815) 490-4901 - Facsimile
chelsten@hinshawlaw.com
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

 
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, September 23, 2008

Back to top