Dear Illinois Pollution QontrtBoard,
CLERK
?
OFFICED
REceive
SEP 19
2008
delist
I am writing
electric
askirkbaelideny
arefürtiace dust (AS
Peoria
2008-010).
Disposal
TheC
?
?
g
iCgtilsok
altaINOis
Soar°
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot
its existing
be assured—PDC
landfill, the process
conducted
details
no
are
assessment
not available
of
for
the
review,
impact
theon
0C/7/
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of •ur community.
(Name)
7 3 4 63,
?
Muat
e—r—L-e—Lych_ef
(Address)
?
(7- 6/64 7
C
y
Air=
Dear Illinois Pollution Contro$ELERgart19
K s
S
opp
200$
f-fi
?
?
h//?
) ?
(
W
?
1--
I am writing asking yottiST4a?
frritAlfgrabsal Company's?
request to
delist electric arc furnace dust (A
aittN-053tOicrThe
delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
1
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the
San
Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
C-
I- k
(Name)
I-
?
t
1
73-
(Add
ress)
?
r?
c 3
"Cri
RK'EC
S
OFFICE
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP
19
2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
Comply-n(
STATE
11w
?
st-INU,::iL
,
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a
i
nk
(/' soar(
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health .,;()
and safety of our community.?
e
(Name)
-e_?
o
(Address)t
iQ■?
N?
(-1 ---CeA
14-7 "/
LI
r
, ecpr
4
?
Ce. / k
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10?
RECEIVED
CLERK'S
OFFICE
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,SEP 1 9 2008
As
concerned
Company
a member
is
about
granted
of Heart
the
delisting
precedent
of Illinois
of Electric
being
Group
set
Arc
Sierra
if
Furnace
Peoria
Clupw
isposaiDust
W,754r
waste.
Lor
?
Bitoaat:ro
t.1
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
December
process PDC
2007
claims
and
is
February
safe. Their
2008,
own
yet
testing
this
occurred
waste could
only
be
in
in
0
‘
U /
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting re uest and urge that it be denied.
Signed 46C 0_
4A ) )1 . 99 AA --Q A —)
Address
utAkOitr
R
c
–
LE-Ricic
-
s
,
.
OFFics.
I ve 0
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEp 7 9
2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comprfij
or4r?
to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The del
g9i1003)
?
N-L(Nois
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County andati
Board
the
cannot
IPCB
be
have
assured—PDC
already denied.
conducted
The safety
no assessment
of what PDC
of
is
the
proposingimpact
on
?
7.
testing
its existing
was
landfill,
very limited,
the process
no independent
details are
labs
not
verified
available
the results,
for review,
and
the
no
0
/
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
di-gni
• ..-/-. I fret-4-4--n
(Address)
/31 7
1
)7
?
cc" 7
(me)Na
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
?
RECEIVE'?CLERK'S
OFFICF
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, SEP 1 9 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I
NT/
greatly ILLtN91::
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria C
rallbtadn
t;ontrol
B
o
a
Company
has
is
been
granted
no independent
delisting of Electric
testing of
Arc
the
Furnace
new treatment
Dust waste.
There
?
e
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Address,
?
Li
ReCeivED
CLERics OFFIDF
SEP 1 g 2008R
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal C.
••
1••
•
1
.
it
i
's request To
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peons ddRetgifichior.-
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). Tlp
Si
I
i
• .
WAtuaot
i )17
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
ST,
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at?
dfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simp shi the risks to safe
communities over the Mahom: a '
work with the citizens of Cent
closing this unwanted legac
and safety o r communi
a
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
•
eliminat
'?
•
? ,
•
r
-416
sks to the health
in. •
so
a •••■••
(A
ifreaSti
I■1 me`
11
por ap -
/?
e
(Name)
litir
tu