1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10

 
STATE
OF
14
`tit
l
ret641
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust wast .
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, includinwones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
conditions,
Protection Act,
receiving
which
body
require
of water
considerations
and other
of
issues.
existing
I
ameteliga0FFICI
Ayeet
E
i
v E
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it to denied.
SEP 1 2 2008
Awc.--161/

 
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.#
process
There has
PDC
been
claims
no independent
is safe. Their
testing
own testing
of the
occurred
new treatment
only in
pV
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal aste landfill
in
Protection
Illinois. I
Act,
believe
which
this
require
violates
considerations
factors of the
of
IL
existEn
?
?
Wet)
ACE
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. tv-B *gray
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it bed
?
L
ZUU8
Signed
Address
r.
taractio
ssM
OF
ILLINOLgb
r
es
?
l
I?
61 el

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
-
delist
door expansion
electric arc
of
furnace
the landfill,
dust
an
(AS
expansion
2008-010).
both
The
Peoria
delisting
County
is a backand
?
nee
the
cannot
IPCB
be
have
assured—PDC
already denied.
conducted
The safety
no assessment
of what PDC
of the
is proposing
impact on
p C -,"
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe dri,
?
r to
work
communities
with the
over
citizens
the
of
Mahomet
Central Illinois
aquifer
to
instead
begin the
of the
process
San Kfttof
tru
?
y OFFICE
WED
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks t
otepipalth
and safety of our Gqm nity.
/ z 2068
pypugiaed76ov
4?
11-LINOss
cialititz „ a
mem Board
(Address)
)11441-14.4a.,
?
(pfife_

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
the
door
cannot
IPCB
expansion
be
have
assured—PDC
already
of the landfill,
denied.
conducted
an
The
expansion
safety
no assessment
of
both
what
Peoria
PDC
of the
is
County
proposing
impact
andon
?
oter/
\
if
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the pro
?
s of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risk
IC
EirvED
and safety of our community.
?
ERKS
OFFICE
-
7
C 4.7r7 ?
1
2008
(Name)
)?
(
?
g_o hraglgrEnza=3188
(Address)

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the
cannot
IPCB
be
have
assured—PDC
already denied.
conducted
The safety
no assessment
of what PDC
of the
is proposing
impact onR
t., .7
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the
pRiere9
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further
rigkartitt
and safety of our community.
EP 12
2008
f
Name)
N1Q) CoduvOiL0edlisAFree:?
rrA.r
ILLINOis
(Address)
bsq
IQ ED
v'1
?
a-04,,Ca?
0 a& i
li
nt"
B°ard

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to 4236
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and o tor
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing j
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead
ofj S
n Koty. Please
closing
work with
this
the
unwanted
citizens of
legacy
Central
and
Illinois
eliminating
to begin
further
tli
I?
?
eStOFP
Vigo
and safety of ou( community.
C
., 11 Sri
?
r4STATE
SEP
or
1
?8
lud
Name
?
mutton
IC737 1\1 PoJell i)
r,?
P.,c r
usa /
?
trot
*

 
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, I am greatly
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
?
vkI
Company?
s granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste. •-‘i
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Envi nmental
gtiff
conditions,
opposed
Protection
to
Act,
this
receiving
which
delistin
body
require
request
of
considerations
water
and urge
and other
that
of
it
issues.
be
exisde9LEFI.?
dI
1
AICE
2 2008
VED
Signed ?
14-CLA/4-7C
ttkva/
PoltuQn
STATE
Contro
OF
ILUNOIS
73 19 At VI ?
rd
Address?
I--•;)1De Or
d
rt3
FeOri.)
6 1
611

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
delist
door expansion
electric arc
of
furnace
the landfill,
dust
an
(AS
expansion
2008-010).
both
The
Peoria
delisting
County
is a backand
?
?
.1,%
A
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing IM/V
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead?
e San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin t ?
aftED
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating furthe?
PlE@Cialth
and safety of our community.

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the r
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further
n_ esst
ota
?
D
and safety of our community.
SEP 1 2 2008
73C
?
A
?
—L
41--
rPO
'4TATC
ItltiOI •
or ILLovulS
ilUf
Board
(Name)
-7/0?
(Address)
oi —Oar
?
_s
6iler„,7 &

 
Dear
Illinois Pollution Control Board,
delist
I am writing
electric
asking
arc furnace
you to
dust
deny
(AS
Peoria
2008-010).
Disposal
The
Company's
delisting is
request
a back
tc(
?
■\411V.
SI37
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
cannot
the IPCB
be
have
assured—PDC
already denied.
conducted
The safety
no assessment
of what PDC
of the
is proposingimpact
o
?
Sep
09
testing
its existing
was
landfill,
very limited,
the process
no independent
details are
labs
not available
verified the
for review,
results,
thand
0?
1
2"
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
6, ?
disposed.
PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
vTioTRIVIth-
tne ciriTens of Central Illinois to begin the process
Mt
.41
161VE
S
OFFICE
D
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San 14
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to tk
s
sAealW
and safety of our community.?
•?
tr 1 / 2008
iCadargt%002.
(Address)
14t2- W T-
661.?
%-v(e-
?
((b r'{

Back to top