1. Page 1
    2. Page 2
    3. Page 3
    4. Page 4
    5. Page 5
    6. Page 6
    7. Page 7
    8. Page 8
    9. Page 9
    10. Page 10
    11. Page 11
    12. Page 12
    13. Page 13
    14. Page 14
    15. Page 15
    16. Page 16
    17. Page 17
    18. Page 18
    19. Page 19
    20. Page 20
    21. Page 21
    22. Page 22
    23. Page 23
    24. Page 24

 
CLERK
CLERKs
S
0
RFIcE
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,?
SEP?
1
200a
ftmen
STARE •
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a •
tiOa
-
lSrd
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Cor-
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent
labs
verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
?
t
and safety of our community.
(Nam
e)
Ame
(Address)
/7-
Z frie ' / 5
7 A
'
t
/
?
0(11/4 /
1
-

 
c
Lefi
r
t.
F. g
ve,
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company
P
ollution
STATEe
s
reSiOktotps
OF
r
,
'LLINOR
--
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
agrd
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
communities
disposed. PDC's
over
proposal
the Mahomet
simply
aquifer
shifts the
instead
risks
of
to
the
safe
San
drinking
Koty.
water
Please
to
?
it
work
closing
with
this
the
unwanted
citizens of
legacy
Central
and
Illinois
eliminating
to begin
further
the process
risks to
of
the
truly
health
?
DcAy
I
and safety of our community.
(Name)
,?
41f
ke
M
I
nta
hate
qaQ
3303 41..R;li
nto
.
re
,
fi-eoria,21
6,/00V
(Address)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
ScP
L. I
20
-
0a

 
dre
1:11
CLEW
e
°FFICE
VI
E
D
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
Sri)
PCr 1 1
2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Dispos4tUtilfamis
i
L
?
to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). Tilibikktilistkm
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria Coun y
RtlItt
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
?
i
47
and safety of our community.
(Name)
ireariA
b
t
st_ •
"
(C
A4
i)-eY2)
41

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
RECEIVED
CLERK'S
OFFICE
SEP 1 1 2698
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
CorrnATERgliutisUNOIS
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The
Balkttivialbtmai
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the he la,
f
and safety of our community.
;4
11P
/3I/ 60,
M055
Ave
, Peor/e–SL
/‘,66
(Address)
(Name)
).(4Aajtt,_,

 
T...
--LeRFrs
OFFICE
-
SEP 1 1 2008
As
To
a
the
member
Members
of Heart
of the
of
Illinois
Illinois
PdttutiOn
Group Sierra
Controlgy0
Club,
P
ion
OF
Con
ILUlNOIStro
S
ollut
I am greatly
oar°
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
pot
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed rhnor,4
(i):1(
gsr
("M A
eC1A
S. WILLSOA))
Address:
2
)33
LA./ i3-ARRIA)(-5701)
fib PECIZA
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
LERar§OFFICE
1 1 2008
c
Bev
?
.-
D
SEP
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Comp
ST
n
4414dNois
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is AT
AP
I
Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
?
'le
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
a
(
IdI
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
9L..
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating ftkrther risks to the health
and safety of our comm ity.
?
VAAAd-
C___
c
1LAA
Th
,
ia_
En-( c_. Euvioto 9
(Name)
'3
E
(t,
?, VI (G
il ?
b /
,,,-,
Litio , P E7
9
--(8- ,
r
t
,
G(
tti
(Address)

 
crericIVVED
vFF/ce
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
s
`-P
SS?
TAVE
OF
1 2008
1 20
A
0
0
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra ClublittirrosedithOIS
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal ?
Board
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
p t s
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Py
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed
77.Clar,dji2t4
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
Address
///VW
.1„-N-n-2zza?
zeutat
b
-_,,c3

 
Signed
Addr
CLERK'S OFFICEn
SEP 1 1 2008
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
STATE OF ILLINOIS
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Cl
Club,
ard
ub
, I am geawf
?
Bo
0
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
?
p IPA
be able to se
n
d their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill ?Vir
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
,(24/
i
/1/4/7--
?
T.
F/eininc-
F-
pc
12-
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10

 
Signed
Address 24)5
t
rk (, cid Dr.
q
e(ni-i.
IL
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
CLERK.,
uFFICE
ED
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Bold?
I
I
STATE
OF
3:ir
OIS
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Ogilki►iliers
^
0ard
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposa
-
?
4138
.
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
opposed
conditions,
to this
receiving
delisting
body
request
of water
and
and
urge
other
that it
issues.
be denied.
I am strongly 66

 
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
SM
E
c..
P
1
i
2:
0
F
O
N
I 8E
:::
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution ControLogiQ
iiiti
atT
rA OF
L
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club, f
arrcIfttli30Eird
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am
tviz
?
strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
hee
._
ktp
Signed ?/ /7/
t.a04-)
Address
A
K-
)c)
?
a 7\17 \

 
Imv
C7
Arc so
CLERK'S OFFICE
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board, ?
SEP 1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal?
0?
ILL,?
0IS
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). Th-?
e?
is a?
ack
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our
WAYA/E?
r Ate>
?
rdY
e
?sat
,
We
tARA-7 n/r;,r iv RD.
community.

 
ruat
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10 •?
CLERKS
(Wive
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
S&
1 1 2008
STATE OF ILLINOIS
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Clubl,
eilla
*
fr
9
r
fthtrol
Boarn
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
?
I"
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
of,
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this del
.
'ng request and ge that it be denied.
Signed
Address 90 /2 i
bi
tain#1 egife;t--

 
RE:EIVED
CLEF
F* '
OFFICE
SEP 1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
CcelpgreCiPittiNGIS
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010).
ThecalltitItirgilloaleettlioard
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work
closing
with
this
the
unwanted
citizens of
legacy
Central
and
Illinois
eliminating
to begin
further
the process
risks
of
to
truly
the heal.-
/Ar
and safety of our community
(Name)
(Address)
C C C?
(:'bc,\,
kek
?
CV \?
cc (/ cr
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,

 
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10?
a4CE
I. .
B
e
lt
7c
-
f
O
s
FFICE
yE
D
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoarcSEP
1 1 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra
CluIPNg4W4
ntrioI
jN
E
g
concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria bispos3r
a
iS
rd
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
opposed
conditions,
to
receiving
this delisting
body
request
of water
and
and
urge
other
that
issues.
it be denied.
I am
?
strongly
Lt
IP
Signed
Address :b---7 --)
lOof
{'ear/{
irt -#

 
RECD
CLERX'S
?
OFFICE
ED
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,?
SEP 1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Compares/weep
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The
delipok/Alortedritrol Board
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
?
n1
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
(Name)
Tle7t-ivt
-
?Ce-evn /44./er-t-fu2J2_
(Address)
Sa
IA) Ad
auk
?
t HIA,;<LL
C/W.5

 
RECEIVED
CLERICS OFFICE
SEP 1'1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Company's request to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010nATheldesKtittek
?
me?
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion
MilWileef.Pitfifintld
tA
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
p
X
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
-Q
Lin j) an-cc-
4
, I:1-
(Name)
(n
q
?
Sen./ ,?
erre L.,4.
0 r
eil
(Address)
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,

 
rsmt.
we
Li
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP 1 1
21123
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal
cffigionoyisayinttwebard
STATE OF ILLINU,
z
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The delisting is a back
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.?
-m
(
11-
72-14A
r
J
/GA11/4
(Address)
C72
4174 Lott fi
e
( r
?74 /Z
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
(Nam
e)

 
RECEIVED
CLERICS OFFICE
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
?
SEP 1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to dery Peoria Disposal
aoittois
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The . - s '.
iteg
?
k
oard
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County and
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on ?
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
(Name)
25/
7
F /hi.%
/6 7l‘

 
RECEIVED
CLERICS OFFICE
SEP 1 1 2008
I am writing asking you to deny Peoria Disposal Co
?
r nest to
delist electric arc furnace dust (AS 2008-010). The
?
it?
ittNoss
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peona ou ry
a,
gl Board c
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on
?
tAy
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
relf\infilliC.4‘.
?
/ROLI
I
(Name) .
24_0
Lt.)
fnSV-V-
(Address)
?
CYV trzt
?
(0 (cc y
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,

 
e_7
egirtgifety_
IAA
Its J
r
?
beCer4ASe____.
Dear Illinois Pollution Contrpl_Qord, pbc_
?
LAJOrvi
-{r)
SEP
1
I
MU
door expansio?
ni ,
an
,;
expansion
4
..:
Disposal
-010).
both
The
Company's
Peoria
delisting
County
is
request
a
and
back
to plc:
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
uo
bet
-i-
cannot be assured—PDC conducted no assessment of the impact on .
its existing landfill, the process details are not available for review, the
I S
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no& trepe+4
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
?
i
n
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to ni
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please r
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the healthp,kt4
&1. LAS •
and safety of our community.
(Name)
(Address)
?
(cht1(7,
I am writing askin
delist electric ar v.1. •
'MI
3hy?
or_n
t\i IMA I ler-
A
p
t
Pea
41-s
-FL

 
Signed
Address
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10?
R
CLERK'S
ECISVISO
1`
F
Ill
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control BoardSEP
1 1 2008
As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Clu
ST
ER
?
roINOIS
concerned about the precedent being set if Peori
?
osa
?
l
Board
There
Company
has
is
been
granted
no independent
delisting of
testing
Electric
of
Arc
the
Furnace
new treatment
Dust waste.
,n
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting reque
?
nd urge that it be denied.

 
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
•?
,
?
erEi9ZIWID
OFF/CE
To the Members of the Illinois Pel!bon Control Boare$,EP
1 1 2006
?As a member of Heart of Illinois Group Sierra Club,
STATE
I am
nw4pg
If'9
?
Nois
?concerned about the precedent being set if Peoria Disposal
?
I
Board
There
Company
process
December
has
PDC
is
been
2007
granted
claims
no
and
independent
delisting
February
is safe. Their
of
2008,
Electric
testing
own
yet
testing
of
Arc
this
the
Furnace
waste
new
occurred
could
treatment
Dust
only
be
waste.in
?
in
ptt,
At
y
et
t
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals eventually from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois.
I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
oppose to this delisting
?
uest and urge that it be denied.
91-
Add
rese
.0.(&
1
4
440 S
e.t.a
ai■
?
Oc73(A

 
Dear Illinois Pollution Control Board,
n E
?
a
Valls,
CLERK'S OFFICE
SEP 1 1 2008
delist
I am writing
electric arc
asking
furnace
you
dust
to deny
(AS 2008-010).
Peoria Disposal
The deliathiterrip
Comp**
?
ol
NOIS
Boarc
door expansion of the landfill, an expansion both Peoria County an
the IPCB have already denied. The safety of what PDC is proposing
cannot
its existing
be assured—PDC
landfill, the process
conducted
details are
no assessment
not available
of
for
the
review,
impact
the
on
GV
testing was very limited, no independent labs verified the results, and no
on-site testing was conducted at the landfills where the material will be
disposed. PDC's proposal simply shifts the risks to safe drinking water to
communities over the Mahomet aquifer instead of the San Koty. Please
work with the citizens of Central Illinois to begin the process of truly
closing this unwanted legacy and eliminating further risks to the health
and safety of our community.
on2b3:1-&-
?
%-C-Nic•-1/4
(Name)
cok
?
.
Aitifra
g
t t2. AcC da.e.4.14
re__.
6161
(Address)

 
Public Comment RE: Case AS 08-10
To the Members of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,
3e0i4dVE
CLERK'S
OFFICE
SEP 1
1 2008
/?
Aj A4
n
(
e
won!
?
v
Address_p? • ( ‘Icoc
O
As
concerned
a member
about
of Heart
the precedent
of Illinois Group
being
Sierra
set if Peoria
Club, I
Disposal
am
lgreetivF
Thntrni
ILLIN
gni
Company is granted delisting of Electric Arc Furnace Dust waste.
There has been no independent testing of the new treatment
process PDC claims is safe. Their own testing occurred only in
D eel
December 2007 and February 2008, yet this waste could be in
our local landfills, including ones over the Mahomet Aquifer, forever.
I am concerned about dioxins, furans, mercury, and other heavy
metals leaching from this waste. If delisting is granted, PDC will
be able to send their treated EAF to any municipal waste landfill
in Illinois. I believe this violates factors of the IL Environmental
Protection Act, which require considerations of existing physical
conditions, receiving body of water and other issues. I am strongly
opposed to this delisting request and urge that it be denied.
Signed

Back to top