BEFORE
THE
ILLiNOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
CLERK’S
CVD
OFFICE
IN
THE
MATTER
OF:
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
TO
)
ACTION
TIERED
APPROACH
OBJECTIVES
TO
CORRECTIVE
)
fl
(35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
742)
U
r\
1—
NOTICE
Dorothy
Gunn,
Clerk
Bill
Richardson
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
Chief
Legal
Counsel
James
R. Thompson
Center
Illinois
Dept.
of
Natural
Resources
100
W.
Randolph,
Suite
11-500
One
Natural
Resources
Way
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
Springfield,
Illinois
62702-127
1
(Via
First
Class
Mail)
(Via
First
Class
Mail)
Matt
Dunn
Environmental
Bureau
Chief
Office
of
the
Attorney
General
James
R.
Thompson
Center
100
W. Randolph,
12
th
Floor
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
(Via
First
Class
Mail)
PLEASE
TAKE
NOTICE
that
I
have
today
filed
with
the
Office
of
the
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency’s
(“Illinois
EPA”)
Motion
for
Acceptance,
Appearance
of
Attorney,
Certification
of
Origination,
Motion
for
Leave
from
Filing
Requirement.
List
of
Studies
and
Reports
Used
in
Regulatory
Development.
Statement
of
Reasons,
and
the
Proposed
Amendments
a
copy
of
each
of
which
is
herewith
served
upon
you.
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
By:______
AsstantCornsel
Division
of
Legal
Counsel
R09-
(Rulemaking-Land)
SEP
03
2008
STATE
OF
LLINOIS
Pollution
Control
Board
)
DATE: September
2, 2008
•
•
1021 North
Grand
Avenue East
P.O.
Box 19276
Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276
(217)782-5544
BEFORE
THE
ILLTh4OIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOAECEVED
LERK
S
OFFICE
IN THE
MATTER
OF:
)
)
R09-
0’
)
032008
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
TO
)
(Rulemaking-LandSTATE
OF
‘WNOIS
TIERED
APPROACH
TO
CORRECTIVE
)
‘01ttion
Control
Board
ACTIONOBJECTIVES
I
(35
Iii
Adm
Code
742)
MOTION
FOR
ACCEPTANCE
NOW
COMES
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(“Illinois
EPA”)
and,
pursuant
to 35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
102.106,
102.200,
and
102.202,
moves
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
(“Board”)
to accept
the
Illinois
EPA’s
proposal
for
hearing.
This
regulatory
proposal
includes:
1) the
Appearance
for
the
attorney
representing
the
Illinois
EPA;
2) Certification
of
Origination;
3)
the
Statement
of
Reasons;
and
4)
the
Proposed
Amendments.
Respectfully
submitted,
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
By:
DATE:
August
6
,2008
1021
North
Grand
Avenue
East
P.O.
Box
19276
Springfield,
Illinois
62794-9276
(217)782-3397
Director
THIS
FILING
SUBMITTED
ON
RECYCLED
PAPER
IN
THE MATTER
OF:
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS TO
TIERED
APPROACH
TO
CORRECTIVE
ACTION
OBJECTIVES
(35
Ill.
Adm.
Code 742)
)
R09-
)
(Rulemaking-Land)
)
)
)
The
undersigned,
as
one of
its attorneys,
hereby
enters
her
entry
of
Appearance
on
behalf
of the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
By:
DATE:
September
2, 2008
1021 North
Grand
Avenue
East
P.O. Box
19276
Springfield,
Illinois
62794-9276
(217)782-5544
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
OVED
OFP1
SEP
032008
STA1Eop
POllution
Controi
ILLINOIS
Board
APPEARANCE
l)
f
[
.
Division
of
Legal
Counsel
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
CLEF?1css
IN
THE
MATTER
OF:
)
SEP
03
2008
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
TO
)
(RulemkingLand)P0IkJtiOn
°cojN
8
O1S
TIERED
APPROACH
TO
CORRECTiVE
)
oarcj
ACTION
OBJECTIVES
)
(35
Iii
Adm
Code
742)
)
)
CERTIFICATION
OF
ORIGINATION
NOW
COMES
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(“Illinois
EPA”)
and,
pursuant
to 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
102.202(i),
certifies
that
this
proposal
for
amendments
to
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
742
amends
the
most
recent
version
of that
rule
as
published
on the
Illinois Pollution
Control
Board’s
website.
Respectfully
submitted,
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
mberly
Geving
Assistant
Counsel
DATE: September
2,
2008
1021
North
Grand
Avenue
East
P.O.
Box
19276
Springfield,
Illinois
62794-9276
(217)782-5544
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BO47
14
!Qt/o
C°LL/NO,
1N THE
MATTER
OF:
)
°1’8Orci
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO
)
R09-
TIERED
APPROACH TO
CORRECTIVE
)
(Rulemaking-Land)
ACTION
OBJECTIVES
)
(35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
742)
)
)
MOTION
FOR
LEAVE
FROM
FILING
REQUIREMENT
NOW
COMES the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(“Illinois
EPA”)
and, pursuant
to
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
10 1.500,
moves
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
(“Board”)
to waive
the
filing
requirement
pursuant
to
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
10
1.306(a)
for
two
of the
Illinois
EPA’s
amended
Incorporations
by
Reference.
In
support
of
its
motion,
the
Illinois
EPA
asserts,
and the
Board
has
confirmed,
that
the
titles
for
which
this
motion
seeks
relief
from
the
filing
requirement
are
already
in
the
Board’s
possession.
Additionally,
they
are
voluminous,
multiple
volume
documents
that
would
be
unduly
burdensome
and
costly
to copy.
WHEREFORE, the
Illinois
EPA
seeks
relief
from
the
filing
requirement
for
the
following titles:
(1)
“Test
Methods
for Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
PhysicallChemical
Methods,”
USEPA
Publication
No.
SW-846,
as amended
by
Updates
I,
II, ILk,
JIB,
III,
lilA,
and
TuB,
prepared
by
USEPA
and
available
from
National
Technical
Information
Service,
5285
Port
Royal
Road,
Springfield,
VA
22161
or
online
at
http
://www.epa.
gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/test/main.htm
;
and
(2)
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
CFR
Promulgated
Test
Methods,
Method
3C,
“Determination
of Carbon
Dioxide,
Methane,
Nitrogen,
and Oxygen
from
Stationary
1
Sources”
and
Method
16,
“Semicontinuous
Determination
of
Sulfur
Emissions
from
Stationary
Sourées,”Technology
Transfer
Network,
Emission
Measurement
Center,
V
(2007)
available
online
at http
://www.epa.
gov/ttnlemc/promgate.html.
Respectfully
submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
imberly
Aj Geving
Assistant
Counsel
Division
of
Legal
Counsel
DATED:
September
2,
2008
1021
North
Grand
Avenue
East
P.O.
Box
19276
Springfield, Illinois
62794-9276
2
List of
Studies
and
Reports
Used
in Regulatory Development
American Petroleum
Institute
(Nov.
2005).
A
Practical
Strategy
for Assessing
the
Subsurface
Vapor-to-Indoor-Air
Migration Pathway
at
Petroleum
Hydrocarbon
Sites.
API
Publication
4741.
http://www.itrcweb.org/Documents/VI-
1
.pdf
Agency
for
Toxic
Substances
and
Disease
Registry
(Jan.
2004).
Health
Consultation:
Active
Soil Gas
Data
Review,
Chillum
Perc
Site,
Chillum,
Prince
Georges
County, Maryland.
http
://www.atsdr.cdc.
gov/hac/PHAlchillumperc/cps
p1
.html
Bibler,
G. &
Mason, E. (Nov.
2005).
Scrutiny
of
Indoor
Air
Pathway
Affects
Standards
for
Investigation
and
Cleanup.
Daily
Environment Report,
11-10-05.
http
://net2.gph.com//media!64E898D7D8F0423
79F78727C
1
EC07A43
.ashx
California EPA,
Department
of
Toxic
Substances
Control
(Feb.
2005).
Interim
Final
Guidance
for
the
Evaluation
and
Mitigation of
Subsurface
Vapor
Intrusion
to
Indoor
Air.
http
://www.dtsc.ca.
gov/assessingrisk/upload!herd
pol
eval
subsurface
vapor
mt
rusion
interim_final.pdf
California
EPA,
Department
of Toxic
Substances
Control
(Jan.
2003).
Advisory
on
Active
Soil Gas
Investigations.
http
://www.dtsc.ca.gov/lawsregspolicies/policies/SiteCleanup/uploadlSMBR
AD
V_activesoilgasinvst.pdf
Colorado
Department
of
Public
Health
and
Environment
(Sept.
2004).
Draft
Indoor
Air
Guidance.
http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/HM/indoorair.pdf
Department of the
Army,
U.S.
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
(Sept
1993).
Indoor
Radon
Prevention
and
Mitigation.
Technical
Letter
No.
1110-3-438.
http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/DOD/IJFC/ufc
3_490_04a.pdf
Fetter,
C.W.
(1994).
Applied
Hydrogeology,
3
Edition.
Available
at the
Illinois
EPA
library,
Call
Number:
551.48
FETT
1994
Folkes,
D.
(Dec
2002).
Design,
Effectiveness,
and
Reliability
of
Sub-Slab
Depressurization
Systems
for
Mitigation
of
Chlorinated
Solvent
Vapor
Intrusion.
EnviroGroup
Limited.
Presented
at
the
U.S.
EPA
Seminar
on Indoor
Air
Vapor
Intrusion,
San
Francisco.
http
://w’ww.
envirogroup.comlpublications/folkes_epa_seminar.pdf
Hartman,
B.
(Sept.
2006).
How
to
Collect
Reliable
Soil-Gas
Data
for
Risk-Based
Applications,
Specifically
Vapor
Intrusion:
Part
Four,
Updates
on
Soil-Gas
Collection
and
Analytical
Procedures.
LUSTLine
Bulletin
#53.
http
://www.handpmg.comllustline53
-soil-gas-part-4.htm
International
Building
Code
(2006).
Available
at
the
Illinois
EPA
library
upon
request.
Kremesec,
V., Hopkins, H.
and
Thun,
R. (Feb.
2005).
A
View
of
the Evaluation
of
the
Vapor
Intrusion
Pathway
from
Within
the
Petroleum
Industry.
EM
Magazine,
Air
and
Waste
Management
Association.
http://www.astswmo.org/files/publications/tanks/2005
SoilVaporMonitoringWork
shop/Evaluation-of-Vapor-Intrusion-Pathway-Kxemesec.pdf
Lyman,
W.
and
Reehl,
W.
(1990).
Handbook
of
Chemical
Property
Estimation
Methods.
Available
at
the
Illinois
EPA
library,
Call Number:
547.3
LYMA
1990.
McHugh,
T.,
Connor,
J.,
&
Ahmad,
F.
(Mar.
2005).
An
Empirical
Analysis of the
Groundwater-to-Indoor-Air
Exposure
Pathway:
The
Role
of
Background
Concentrations
in
Indoor
Air.
Environmental
Forensics,
Vol.
5,
No.
2.
http://www.gsi-net.com/Publications
/McHugh
GW-Air
2004.pdf
Missouri
Department
of Natural
Resources
(April
2005).
Missouri
Risk-Based
Corrective
Action
for
Petroleum
Storage
Tanks:
Soil
Gas
Sampling
Protocol.
http
://www.dnr.mo.
gov/env/hwp/tanks/docs/soil-gas-protocol-2005-04-2
1
.pdf
New
Hampshire
Department
of
Environmental
Services
(April
2005).
Draft
Vapor
Intrusion
Guidance.
http
://www.des.state.nh.us/ORCB/doclist/pdf7vapor_intrusion.pdf
New
Jersey
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
(June
2005).
Draft
Vapor
Intrusion
Guidance.
http
://www.state.nj
.us/dep!srp/uidance/vaporintrusionJvig.htm
New
York
Department
of
Environmental
Conservation
(Nov.
2004).
Evaluating
the
Potential
for
Vapor
Intrusion
at
Past,
Current
and
Future
Sites,
Draft.
http
://www.ny-brownfields.comJPDF
Files/Draft_Policy.pdf
Pennsylvania
Department
of Environmental
Protection
(June
2004).
Land
Recycling
Program
Technical
Guidance
Manual
Section
IV.A.4
Vapor
Intrusion
into
Buildings
from
Groundwater and
Soil
Under
the Act
2 Statewide
Health
Standard.
http://164.156.71
.80/VWRQ.asp?docid=2087d8407c0e0000000005
110000051
1&
context=2&backlink=WXOD.aspx%3ffs%3
d2087d8407c0e0000800005
1000000
510%26ft%3d1
Persily,
A.
(March
1999).
Myths
About
Building
Envelopes.
ASHRAE
Journal.
http
://www.argonair.com/pdflMyth%2OAbout%2OBldg%2OEnv.pdf
Siegel,
L.
(April
2005).
A Community View
of
Vapor
Intrusion.
Center
for
Public
Environmental
Oversight.
http
://www.cpeo
.org!pubs/CommunityView-V12.doc
Stanin,
F.
(March
2006).
Vapor
Intrusion:
Breaking
Through
the
Roadblocks
to
Progress.
Superfund
and
Natural
Resource
Damages
Litigation
Committee
Newsletter.
Vol.
3,No.
1.
http
://www.abanet.org/environlcommittees/superfundnatresdamages/newsletter/m
arO6/superfundO3 06 .pdf
The
Star-Ledger
(Aug.
12, 2006).
DEP
to
review
sites
after
day-care
fiasco.
Newark,
New
Jersey.
Available
from
the
Illinois
EPA
library
upon
request.
U.S.
EPA
(Mar.
2008).
Brownfields
Technical
Primer:
Vapor
Intrusion
Considerations
for
Redevelopment.
EPA 542-R-08-00
1.
http
://www.brownfieldstsc.org/pdfs/BTSC%2OVapor%20lntrusion%20Considerat
ions%20for%20Redevelopment%2OEPA%20542-R-08-00
1
.pdf
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
SEp
IN
THE
MATTER
OF:
)
V
)
2008
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TO
)
R09-
Uti
Contro’IOIS
TIERED
APPROACH
TO
CORRECTIVE
)
(Rulemaking-Land)
ACTION
OBJECTIVES
)
(35
Iii
Adm
Code
742)
)
STATEMENT
OF
REASONS
The
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(“Illinois
EPA”)
hereby
submits
its
Statement
of
Reasons
for
the
above-captioned
matter
to
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
(“Board”) pursuant
to
Section
27
of
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act
(“Act”)(41
5
ILCS
5/27)
and
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
102.200
and
102.202.
I.
FACTS
IN
SUPPORT,
PURPOSE,
AND
EFFECT
A.
Background
On
December
15,
1995,
P.A.
89-43
1
(which
added
a
new
Title
XVII
to the
Act)
was
signed
into
law by
Governor
Edgar.
Pursuant
to
Section
58.11(c)
of the
Act,
Illinois
EPA
proposed
regulations
prescribing
procedures
and
standards
for
the
Illinois
EPA’s
administration
of
its
duties
under
Title
XVII.
That
proposal
became
known
as
the Tiered
Approach
to
Corrective
Action
Objectives
(“TACO”) under
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
742,
which
established
a
system
whereby sites
undergoing
remediation
in
the
Site Remediation
Program
(“SRP”),
the
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
(“LUST”)
Program,
and RCRA
Part
B Permits
and
Closures
could
use
the methodology
set
forth
in the
TACO
rules
to
determine
remediation
objectives.
Since
the
inception
of
the
initial
rulemaking,
TACO’
s
applicability
has
been
expanded
outside
the
three
programs
listed
above.
Part
742
established
procedures
for
developing
remediation
objectives
based
on
various
risks
to
human
health
posed
by environmental
conditions
at
a site.
Because
human
health
may
be
1
impacted
by
any
type
of
environmental
contamination,
whether
it
originates
from
petroleum,
metals,
or some
other
type
of waste,
it
was
logical
to
create
a single
set of
procedures
that
any
of
the
land
remediation
programs
could
use
to address
contamination
at
any
given
site.
What
resulted
was
the
TACO
methodology,
whereby
risks
posed
to
human
health
are
evaluated,
site
conditions
are
assessed,
and
individuals
propose
remediation
objectives
to mitigate
conditions
at
the
site
so that
they
no longer
pose
a
threat
to
human
health.
The
Board
adopted
TACO
on
June
5, 1997
(with
three
sub-dockets
being
adopted
shortly
thereafter).
In
May
of
2000,
Illinois
EPA
proposed
amendments
to TACO
that
were
necessitated
by
new
technology,
science,
and
programmatic
changes.
The
Board
adopted
those
amendments
in
December
of
2000,
with
two
sub-dockets
being
adopted
shortly
thereafter.
In
2002
and
again
in
2005,
the
Board
adopted
additional
amendments
to
TACO
for
the purpose
of
keeping
the
TACO
procedures
and
requirements
current
and
to
improve
standards
and
procedures
so
that
end
users
of the
rules
can
achieve
accurate
data
results
that
are
protective
of human
health.
The
new
amendments
propose
to add
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
to
the
existing
risk-based
methodology. The
indoor
inhalation
pathway
will
be
managed
similarly
to
the
current
exposure
routes
under
TACO.
It follows
the
basic
framework
of
TACO’s
three
tiers,
calculates
both
residential
and
industrial/commercial
remediation
objectives,
and
allows
for
pathway
exclusion.
Individuals
will
assess
indoor
inhalation
exposure
using
collected
soil
and
groundwater
or
soil
gas
data
and
then
apply
a modified
Johnson
and
Ettinger
(J&E)
model
to
develop
remediation objectives.
The
modified
J&E
model
simulates
the
migration
of contaminants
from
a
subsurface source
to
the air
inside
a
building.
Additional
equations
are presented
that
calculate
acceptable
soil,
groundwater
and
soil
gas
remediation
objectives.
This
modified
J&E
model
used
2
in
TACO
contains
18
equations
and
56 parameters.
Like
the
Soil
Screening
Level
(“SSL”)
and
Risk
Based
Corrective
Action
(“RBCA”) models
used
for
other
exposure
routes,
modified
J&E
model
parameters
have
conservative
default
values
under
Tier
1
that
can
be substituted
for
site-
specific
conditions
under
Tier
2.
Tier
3
allows
the
use
of subsiab
soil
gas
data
to
establish
remediation
objectives.
A
new
Subpart
L
provides
requirements
for building
control
technologies
to
mitigate
the
potential
for
contaminated soil
gas to
enter
the
indoor
air,
an approach
similar
to
engineered
barriers
under
Subpart
K.
The
effect
of
the
proposed
amendments
is
to
protect
building
occupants
from
volatile
chemicals
that
have
the
potential
to migrate
from
the soil
and
groundwater
to
indoor
air.
This
migration
process
has
been
colloquially
referred
to as
“vapor
intrusion.”
There
is
no
legislative
or
regulatory
requirement
to propose
these
amendments.
Illinois
EPA
wants
to
broaden
the
exposure
routes
evaluated
so as
to fully
protect
public
health
from
contaminated
sites
and
to
add more
certainty
to
the release
of liability
provided
by
the
No
Further
Remediation
determination.
Until
now,
Illinois
EPA
has
evaluated
vapor
intrusion
on a
limited
scale,
when
major
indoor
inhalation
risks
are
suspected;
case
studies
of
these
experiences
will
be submitted
to
the
Board
by
Illinois
EPA
as
part
of its
testimony.
U.S.
EPA
recommends
screening
all
sites
that
have
the
potential
to
cause
indoor
inhalation
health
risks.
Other
States
have
experienced
public
health
crises
and
ensuing
legal
and
financial
challenges
caused
by
vapor
intrusion
exposures
at
sites
where
the
indoor
inhalation
pathway
was not
evaluated
as part
of
the regulatory
cleanup
prior
to
issuance
of
the No
Further
Remediation
letter
or its
equivalent.
In
March
2008,
ASTM
International issued
its Standard
Practice
for Assessment
for Vapor
Intrusion
into
Structures
on
Property
Involved
in Real
Estate
Transactions.
Section
9.2.2
of
the
Standard
instructs
users
to
3
apply
State
generic
risk-based
concentrations.
Illinois
EPA’s
amendments
would
establish
such
numbers.
The
amendments
also
propose
to
update
remediation
objectives
for all
of the
exposure
routes
and
their
corresponding
populations:
residential,
industrial/commercial
and
construction
worker.
These
changes
are
needed
to keep
the
rule
current
with
the
scientific
literature
and
protective
of human
health.
B.
Regulatory
Development
Illinois
EPA
convened
an internal
workgroup
to create
a
methodology
for
evaluating
the
indoor
inhalation
pathway that
would
be
compatible
with
and
integrated
into
the
existing
TACO
regulations. The
workgroup
began
by
reviewing
the
draft
vapor
intrusion
guidance
prepared
by
U.S.
EPA
and
state-specific
guidance
prepared
by New
Jersey,
New
York,
Pennsylvania,
Missouri
and
Colorado,
among
others.
Illinois
EPA
also
retained
the
services
of
the
RAIVI
Group,
a
subcontractor
with
expert
knowledge
in contaminant
fate
and
transport.
On
May
25,
2007,
Illinois
EPA
sent
a
first
working
draft
of
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
chairperson of
the
Site
Remediation
Advisory
Committee
(“SRAC”)
for
distribution
to
its
members
and
the regulated
community.
After
they
had
ample
opportunity
to
review
and
comment, Illinois
EPA
met
with
SRAC
members
to
discuss
their
comments
and suggestions.
Those
meetings
occurred
on August
27,
2007;
September
27, 2007;
November
2,
2007;
and
February
6,
2008.
On
May
23,
2008,
Illinois
EPA
sent
a
revised
draft
to
SRAC
addressing
the
many
issues
raised
by
SRAC
in writing
and
in
meetings.
On
June
19,
2008,
Illinois
EPA
met
with
SRAC
to
discuss
the
May
2008
version.
That
meeting
resulted
in
additional
changes
which
are
now
reflected
in the
proposal
filed
with
the Board.
Illinois
EPA
appreciates
the
comments,
4
issues
and
concerns
raised
by
SRAC
and
the
regulated
community.
Their
thoughtfulness
and
thoroughness
significantly
improved
the
Agency’s
proposal.
Affected
Sources
and
Facilities
and
Economic
Impact
Persons
(as
defined
in
Section
58.2
of
the
Act)
affected
by
this
rule
include
any
and
all
persons
undergoing
remediation
who
are
entitled
to use
a risk-based
methodology
for
determining
remediation
objectives.
Such
persons
would
include,
but
not
necessarily
be
limited
to,
those
conducting
remediation
under
the
SRP,
the LUST
Program,
RCRA
Part
B
permits
and
closures,
or other
Illinois
EPA
remediation
programs.
The
use
of
TACO
in
conjunction
with
various
program
regulations
has
accomplished
the
goal
of putting
many
sites
back
into
safe,
productive
use
while
significantly
decreasing
remediation
expenses statewide.
C.
Environmental,
Technical,
and
Economic
Justification
The
original
SSL
and
RBCA
models
from
which
TACO
evolved
included
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
Back
in
1997,
when
TACO
was
first
adopted,
Illinois
EPA
omitted
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure route
intentionally,
due
to a
lack
of
confidence
in
the existing
scientific data.
Ten years
later,
research
gaps
have
narrowed
substantially
and
Illinois
EPA
has
been
able
to calculate
soil,
groundwater
and
soil
gas
remediation
objectives
for
indoor
inhalation
using
generally
accepted
modeling
equations.
The
proposed
indoor
inhalation
amendments
will
increase
the
cost
of
some
site
cleanups
but
will
bring
three
important
benefits.
First,
Illinois
residents
will
be
better
protected
from
volatile
chemicals
migrating
from
contaminated
sites.
Second,
site
owners
or
other
remediation
applicants will
receive
expanded
liability
relief
through
issuance
of
a No
Further
Remediation
letter
that takes
the indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
into
account.
Third,
establishing
5
remediation
objectives
for the
indoor
inhalation
pathway
will
facilitate
property
transactions.
The
benefit
to the
public
should
outweigh
any
additional
remediation
costs.
The
extent
of the
anticipated
cost
increases
is
unknown
and
expected
to vary
widely
depending
on site
and contaminant
characteristics
and
the
willingness
of affected
property
owner(s)
to accept
building
control
technologies
and
institutional
controls.
To
further
ease
implementation
of the
new indoor
inhalation
pathway,
the internal
agency
workgroup
is
preparing
a
guidance
document
containing
detailed
information
on how
to
manage
the exposure
route
under
TACO’s
three
tiers.
II.
THE
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Inserting
a
new exposure
route
into
TACO
requires
comprehensive
changes
to
the existing
regulations.
As
would
be
expected,
these
proposed
amendments
contain
new
definitions,
equations,
parameters,
default
remediation
objectives,
and
mechanisms for
managing
the
indoor
inhalation
pathway.
What
follows
is a general
overview
of
the changes
proposed.
A.
Subpart
A
•
Illinois
EPA
proposes
language
in
Sections
742.110
and 742.115
to
account
for
the
inclusion
of the
modified
J&E
model
and
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
respectively.
B.
Subpart
B
Amendments
to Subpart
B
include:
adding
definitions
for
“Building,”
“Building
Control
Technology,” “Volatile
Chemicals,”
“Soil
Gas,”
and
“Soil
Vapor Saturation
Limit”;
adding
new
incorporations
by
reference;
adding
an exception
in
Section
742.225(b)(5)
stating
that
compositing
and
averaging
of
sample
results
are prohibited
under
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
except
as
approved
by the
Agency
in
Tier 3;
and
adding
new
Sections
742.222
and
6
742.227
to
allow
for
the
use
of
soil
gas data
when
determining
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
C.
Subpart
C
Illinois
EPA
inserted
“Outdoor”
before
“Inhalation
Exposure
Route”
in Section
742.310
and
added
Section
742.3
12 that
states
when
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
may
be
excluded
from
consideration.
As part
of
Section
742.3 12,
the pathway
may be
excluded
by
use
of
a
building
control
technology
that meets
the
requirements
of Subpart
L.
D.
SubpartE
Illinois
EPA
added
Section
742.5
15,
which
explains
how
to
use the
Tier
1 indoor
inhalation
remediation
objectives
for
soil gas,
soil and
groundwater
in Appendix
B,
Table
G.
Under
the
indoor
inhalation
pathway,
unless
the
route
is excluded
from
consideration
under
Subpart
C,
site
evaluators
must
demonstrate
compliance
with either:
1)
soil
and
groundwater,
or
2) soil
gas.
E.
Subpart
F
Illinois
EPA
modified
Section
742.600
to state
that
a
calculated
Tier 2 indoor
inhalation
remediation
objective
for
soil cannot
exceed
the
soil
saturation
limit
and
that a
corresponding
remediation
objective
for
soil gas
cannot
exceed
the
soil
vapor
saturation
limit.
F.
SubpartG
Amendments
to Subpart
G
include:
changing
Section
742.700(g)
to exclude
the
construction
worker
population
from
the indoor
inhalation
exposure
route;
adding
Section
742.717
to
require
use
of the
modified
J&E
model
and
to explain
how
the
J&E equations
for
soil
and
soil gas
data
are to
be
applied;
and under
Sections
742.7
17(i) and
(j),
describing
when
the
7
soil
saturation
limit
and the soil
vapor
saturation
limit
are
to be
used as the
soil and
soil
gas
remediation
objectives,
respectively.
G.
Subpart H
Amendments
to Subpart
H include:
adding
Section
742.805(e)
to
require
individuals
to
use Section
742.8 12
when developing
Tier
2 groundwater
remediation
objectives
for the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route; and
adding
Section
742.8
12 to explain
how
the
J&E
equations
are
to
be used for
developing
groundwater
remediation
objectives.
H.
Subpart I
Amendments
to Subpart
I include:
adding Section
742.935(a)
to
allow
exposure
route
exclusion
(as
an alternative
to Section
742.312)
for
the
indoor inhalation
exposure
route;
adding
Section
742.935(b)
to
allow
the use
of soil
gas
data
(as
an alternative
to
Section
742.227)
to
establish
remediation
objectives
for
the indoor
inhalation
exposure
route;
adding
Section
742.935(c)
to allow
the
use of
building control
technologies
(as an alternative
to
those
described
in Subpart
L) as a means
to prevent
or mitigate
human
exposures
under
the indoor
inhalation
exposure
route;
and
adjusting language
elsewhere
in this Subpart
to account
for
this new
Section.
I.
SubpartJ
Illinois
EPA
added
Section
742.1000(a)(7)
to
require
the use of
institutional
controls
whenever
remediation
objectives
are based
on a building
control
technology.
New
Section
742.1015(j)
states
that a groundwater
ordinance
may
not
be used
to exclude
the indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
This
is because
an ordinance
restricting
the
source of drinking
water
would
be
incapable
of protecting
the enclosed
air
space of
a building
from the migration
of
contaminants
in the
groundwater.
J.
SubpartL
8
Illinois
EPA created
this
subpart
to provide
requirements
for four
types
of
building
control
technologies:
sub-slab
depressurization
systems,
sub-membrane
depressurization
systems,
membrane
barrier
systems,
and
barriers
created
from
geologic
materials.
K.
Appendix
A, Table
A
Illinois
EPA
updated
the
soil saturation
limits
due
to revised
chemical
and
physical
properties
and
added
a column
to
distinguish
between
the
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
and
the
soil component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route.
The difference
in
values
is
based
on
the fraction
of
organic
carbon
content
(f
0
).
Three
footnotes
have
also
been
added.
L.
AppendixA,TableE
Illinois
EPA
added
fifteen
chemicals
based
on
the
proposed
Groundwater
Quality
Standards
(35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
Part
620).
The
entire
table
has
been
alphabetized
by
target
organ.
M.
Appendix
A,
Table
F
Illinois
EPA added
fifteen
chemicals
based
on the
proposed
Groundwater
Quality
Standards
(35
Ill. Adm.
Code
Part
620).
The entire
table
has
been
alphabetized
by target
organ.
N.
Appendix
A, Table
I
Illinois
EPA
added
six
new
chemicals
and
updated
some of
the
Acceptable
Detection
Limits
(“ADLs”).
Some of
the toxicity
values
changed,
resulting
in
changes
to
the
Class
I
Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
and
the
1 in
1,000,000
Cancer
Risk
Concentration.
0.
Appendix
A,
Table
J
This
is a
new table
identifying
the 59
TACO
volatile
chemicals
that
are
considered
contaminants
of
concern
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
P.
Appendix
A,
Table
K
This
is a
new
table identifying
the
soil
vapor saturation
limits
for
the
volatile
9
chemicals
of
concern
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
Q.
Appendix
A,
Table
L
This is
a new
table
identifying
the
soil saturation
limits
for
volatile
chemicals
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
A
separate
table
is
needed
because
the
calculation
of
saturation
limits
for the
indoor
inhalation
pathway
uses
parameter
values
different
than
those
used
to
create
Appendix
A,
Table
A (i.e.,
fraction
organic
carbon
content
and
system
temperature).
R.
Appendix
B, Table
A
Illinois EPA
updated
remediation
objectives
for
all
exposure
routes
using
the
most
current
toxicity
values
and
physical
and
chemical
parameter
values.
We
also
updated
the
previously
titled
“Inhalation”
column
to “Outdoor Inhalation.”
We
modified
two
footnotes
and
added
three
others.
S.
Appendix
B,
Table
B
Illinois
EPA
updated
remediation
objectives
for
all
exposure
routes
using
the
most
current
toxicity
values
and
physical
and
chemical
parameter
values.
We
also
updated
the
previously titled
“Inhalation”
columns
to
“Outdoor
Inhalation.”
We
modified
two
footnotes
and
added
four
others.
T.
Appendix
B,
Table
C
Illinois
EPA
updated
the
pH specific
soil
remediation
objectives
for
arsenic
and
added
a
footnote extending
the pH
range
from
8.75-9
to
8.75-11.0
for
Lead.
U.
Appendix
B,
Table
D
Illinois
EPA
added
a
footnote
extending
the
pH
range
from
8.75-9
to
8.75-11.0
for Lead.
V.
Appendix
B,
Table
E
10
Illinois
EPA
updated
remediation
objectives
for
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
using
the most
current
toxicity
values
and physical
and chemical
parameter
values.
We
also
renamed
this table
and
added
fifteen
chemicals
based
on
the
proposed
Groundwater
Quality
Standards
(35
Iii. Adm.
Code
Part 620).
We
added
six
new footnotes.
W.
Appendix
B,
Table
F
Illinois
EPA
updated
the
GW
0b
concentrations
to reflect
changes
in
the toxicity
values
and
to
keep
pace
with
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
Groundwater
Quality
Standards
(35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
Part
620).
Fifteen
new
chemicals
and
one
footnote
have
been
added.
X.
Appendix
B, Table
G
This
is
a new
table
containing
the
Tier
1 remediation
objectives
for volatile
chemicals
under
the
indoor
inhalation
pathway.
Residential
and
industriallcommercial
values
are
given
for
soil
gas,
soil
and
groundwater.
Y.
Appendix
C,
Table
B
A
few SSL
parameters
have
been
updated.
Sources
for
the
toxicity
values
have
been
updated
to
reflect
changes
in the
USEPA’s
hierarchy
of human
health
toxicity
values.
Z.
Appendix
C,
TableD
A
few
RBCA
parameters
have
been
updated.
Sources
for
the
toxicity
values
have
been
updated
to
reflect
changes
in
the
USEPA’s hierarchy
of human
health
toxicity
values.
AA.
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Illinois
EPA
updated
the
default
values
for
all chemicals
(not
just
volatile
chemicals)
to
be
consistent with current
scientific
literature.
We
also
inserted
a new
column
of default
values
for
Dimensionless
Henry’s
Law
Constant
at
130
C
and
added
three
new
footnotes.
All
values
are
now
expressed
in
scientific
notation.
11
BB.
Appendix
C,
Table
F
Illinois
EPA
added
new
methods
for
determining
the
following
physical
soil
parameters:
total
soil
porosity,
air-filled
soil
porosity,
and
water-filled
soil
porosity.
CC.
Appendix
C,
Table
I
Illinois
EPA
added
MCPP
since
it
is
one
of
the
new
chemicals
proposed
under
the
Groundwater
Quality
Standards
(35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
Part
620)
and
deleted 2,4,5-TP
(Silvex)
because
it no
longer
ionizes
over
the
pH
range
of 4.5-9.0.
DD.
Appendix
C, Table
L
This
is a new
table
containing
the
J&E
equations
used
in
calculating
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
EE.
Appendix
C, Table
M
This
is
a
new
table
containing
the
J&E
parameters
used
in
calculating
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
III.
AGENCY
WITNESSES
AND
SYNOPSIS
OF
TESTIMONY
Illinois
EPA
will
provide
five
witnesses
who
will
be
available
to testify
at
hearing.
The
witnesses are
Gary
King,
Thomas
Homshaw,
TraceyHurley,
and
Joyce
Munie
from
Illinois
EPA
and
Atul
Saihotra
from
the
RAM
Group.
Illinois
EPA
will
submit
written
testimony
in
advance
of
the hearings
pursuant
to any
hearing
officer
order
that
follows
this
proposal.
Illinois
EPA
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
allow
oral
testimony
of
Illinois
EPA’s witnesses
in panel
format
rather
than
calling
each
individually.
This
has
streamlined
several
regulatory
hearings
in the
past
and
allows
Illinois
EPA
to
more
fully
respond
to
questions
during
the
hearing,
thereby
promoting
a
more
complete
hearing
record.
12
As
a note
to the
Board,
Illinois
EPA
does
not
have
a Notice
or
Service
List
for
purposes
of this
proposal.
Therefore,
we
are
sending
this
proposal
to the
individuals
required
by the
Board’s
procedural
rules.
Illinois
EPA
requests
that
once
the Board
establishes
Notice
and
Service
lists
for
this
rulemaking
that
it send
those
to
Illinois
EPA
so
that
we can
properly
serve
parties
with
any
future
submittals.
WHEREFORE,
Illinois
EPA
requests
that
the Board
accept
this
proposal
in
its
entirety
for hearing.
Respectfully
submitted,
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
Assistan
Counsel
Division
of Legal
Counsel
DATED:
September
2, 2008
1021
North
Grand
Ave.
East
P.O.
Box
19276
Springfield,
Illinois
62794-9276
(217)
782-5544
13
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
TITLE
35: ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
SUBTITLE
G:
WASTE
DISPOSAL
CHAPTER
I: POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
f:
RISK
BASED
CLEANUP
OBJECTIVES
PART
742
TIERED
APPROACH
TO
CORRECTIVE
ACTION
OBJECTIVES
SUBPART
A:
INTRODUCTION
Section
742.100
Intent
and
Purpose
742.105
Applicability
742.110
Overview
of
Tiered
Approach
742.115
Key
Elements
742.120
Site
Characterization
SUBPART
B:
GENERAL
Section
742.200
Definitions
742.205
Severability
742.210
Incorporations
by Reference
742.2
15
Determination
of Soil
Attenuation
Capacity
742.220
Determination
of
Soil
Saturation
Limit
742.222
Determination
of Soil
Vapor
Saturation
Limit
742.225
Demonstration
of
Compliance
with
Remediation
Objectives
742.227
Demonstration
of Compliance
with
Soil Gas
Remediation
Objectives
for
the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
742.230
Agency
Review
and
Approval
SUBPART
C: EXPOSURE
ROUTE
EVALUATIONS
Section
742.300
Exclusion
of
Exposure
Route
742.305
Contaminant
Source
and Free
Product
Determination
742.3
10
Outdoor
Irthalation
Exposure
Route
742.312
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
742.315
Soil
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
742.320
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
SUBPART
D:
DETERMINING
AREA
BACKGROUND
Section
742.400
Area
Background
742.405
Determination
of
Area Background
for
Soil
742.410
Determination
of Area
Background
for Groundwater
742.415
Use
of Area
Background
Concentrations
SUBPART
E: TIER
1
EVALUATION
Section
742.500
Tier
1 Evaluation
Overview
742.505
Tier 1
Soil and
Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
742.5
10
Tier
1 Remediation
Objectives
Tables
742.5
15
Tier 1
Remediation
Objectives
Table for the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
SUBPART
F:
TIER
2
GENERAL
EVALUATION
Section
742.600
Tier
2
Evaluation
Overview
742.605
Land
Use
742.6 10
Chemical
and
Site Properties
SUBPART
G:
TIER 2 SOIL
EVALUATION
Section
742.700
Tier
2
Soil Evaluation
Overview
742.705
Parameters
for
Soil
Remediation
Objective
Equations
742.7
10
SSL Soil
Equations
742.715
RBCA
Soil Equations
742.717
Indoor
Inhalation
Equations
for
Soil and
Soil
Gas
742.720
Chemicals
with
Cumulative
Noncarcinogenic
Effects
SUBPART
H: TIER
2 GROUNDWATER
EVALUATION
Section
742.800
Tier
2 Groundwater
Evaluation
Overview
742.805
Tier 2 Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
742.8
10
Calculations
to
Predict
Impacts
from Remaining
Groundwater
Contamination
742.8 12
Indoor
Inhalation
Equations
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
SUBPART
I:
TIER
3
EVALUATION
Section
742.900
Tier
3
Evaluation
Overview
742.905
Modifications
of
Parameters
742.9
10
Alternative
Models
742.915
Formal
Risk
Assessments
742.920
Impractical
Remediation
742.92
5
Exposure
Routes
742.930
Derivation
of
Toxicological
Data
742.93
5
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
SUBPART
J: iNSTITUTIONAL
CONTROLS
Section
742.1000
Institutional Controls
742.1005
No
Further
Remediation
Letters
742.1010
Environmental
Land
Use
Controls
742.1012
Federally
Owned
Property:
Land
Use
Control
Memoranda
of
Agreement
742.1015
Ordinances
742.1020
Highway Authority
Agreements
and
Highway
Authority
Agreement
Memoranda
of
Agreement
SUBPART
K:
ENGINEERED BARRIERS
Section
742.1100
Engineered
Barriers
742.1105
Engineered Barrier
Requirements
SUBPART L:
BUILDING
CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES
Section
742.1200
Building
Control
Technologies
742.1205
Building
Control
Technology
Proposals
742.1210
Building
Control
Technology
Requirements
APPENDIX A
General
ILLUSTRATION
A Developing
Soil Remediation
Objectives Under
the
Tiered
Approach
TLLUSTRATION
B
Developing
Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
Under
the
Tiered
Approach
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
TABLE
A
Soil
Saturation
Limits
(Csat)
for
Chemicals
Whose
Melting
Point
is Less
than
30°C
TABLE
B
Tolerance
Factor
(K)
TABLE
C
Coefficients
{ANJ÷1}
for
W
Test
of Normality,
for
N2(1)50
TABLE
D
Percentage
Points
of
the W
Test
for
n=3(1)50
TABLE
E
Similar-Acting
Noncarcinogenic
Chemicals
TABLE
F
Similar-Acting
Carcinogenic
Chemicals
TABLE
G
Concentrations
of
Inorganic
Chemicals
in
Background
Soils
TABLE
H
Concentrations
of
Polynuclear
Aromatic
Hydrocarbon
Chemicals
in
Background
Soils
TABLE
I
Chemicals
Whose
Tier
1
Class
I Groundwater
Remediation
Objective
Exceeds
the
1 in
1,000,000
Cancer
Risk
Concentration
TABLE
J
List
of TACO
Volatile
Chemicals
for
the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
TABLE
K
Soil
Vapor
Saturation Limits
(CSa
t
)
for Volatile
Chemicals
TABLE
L
Soil
Saturation
Limits
(C)
for
Volatile
Chemicals
for
the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
APPENDIX
B
Tier
1 Illustrations
and Tables
ILLUSTRATION
A
Tier
1 Evaluation
TABLE
A
Tier
1
Soil
Remediation
Objectives
for Residential
Properties
TABLE
B
Tier
1 Soil
Remediation
Objectives
for
Industrial/Commercial
Properties
TABLE
C
pH
Specific
Soil
Remediation
Objectives
for
Inorganics
and
Ionizing
Organics
for
the
Soil
Component
of the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Route
(Class
I
Groundwater)
TABLE
D
pH
Specific
Soil Remediation
Objectives
for
Jnorganics
and
Ionizing
Organics
for
the
Soil
Component
of the
Groundwater Ingestion
Route
(Class
II
Groundwater)
TABLE E
Tier
1
Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
for
the
Groundwater
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Route
TABLE
F
Values
Used
to
Calculate
the
Tier
1 Soil
Remediation
Objectives
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Route
TABLE
G
Tier
1
Indoor
Inhalation
Remediation
Objectives
for
Residential
and
Industrial/Commercial
Properties for
the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
APPENDIX
C
Tier 2
Illustrations
and
Tables
ILLUSTRATION
A
Tier
2
Evaluation
for
Soil
ILLUSTRATION
B Tier
2
Evaluation
for
Groundwater
ILLUSTRATION
C
US
Department
of Agriculture
Soil
Texture
Classification
TABLE
A
SSL
Equations
TABLE
B
SSL
Parameters
TABLE
C
RBCA
Equations
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
TABLE
D
RBCA
Parameters
TABLE
B
Default
Physical
and
Chemical
Parameters
TABLE
F
Methods
for
Determining
Physical
Soil
Parameters
TABLE
G
Error
Function
(erf)
TABLE
H
Q/C
Values
By Source
Area
TABLE
I
K
0
Values
for
Ionizing
Organics
as a
Function
of
pH (cm
3
/g
or
L/kg
or
cm
3
water/gsoji)
TABLE
J
Values
to be
Substituted
for kd
or ks
when Evaluating
Inorganics
as a
Function
of
pH (cm
3
/g
or L/kg
or
cm
3
water/gsoii)
TABLE
K
Parameter
Estimates
for
Calculating
Water-Filled
Soil
Porosity
(Ow)
TABLE
L
J&E
Equations
TABLE
M
J&E Parameters
APPENDIX
D
Highway
Authority
Agreement
APPENDIX
E
Highway
Authority
Agreement
Memorandum
of
Agreement
APPENDIX
F
Environmental
Land
Use
Control
APPENDIX
G
Model
Ordinance
APPENDIX
H
Memorandum
of Understanding
AUTHORITY: Implementing
Sections
22.4, 22.12,
Title
XVI,
and
Title
XVII and
authorized
by
Sections
27
and
58.5
of the
Environmental
Protection
Act [415
ILCS
5/22.4,
22.12,
27,
and
58.5
and
Title XVI
and
Title XVII].
SOURCE: Adopted
in R97-12(A)
at 21111.
Reg. 7942,
effective
July
1,
1997;
amended
in
R97-
12(B)
at
21111.
Reg.
16391,
effective
December
8,
1997;
amended
in R97-12(C)
at
22
111.
Reg.
10847,
effective
June
8, 1998;
amended
in
R00-19(A)
at 25
111.
Reg. 651,
effective
January
6,
2001;
amended
in
RO0-19(B)
at
25 Ill.
Reg.
10374,
effective
August
15,
2001;
amended
in
R00-
19(C)
at
26 Ill.
Reg.
2683,
effective
February
5, 2002;
amended
in R06-10
at
31111. Reg.
4063,
effective
February
23,
2007;
amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
NOTE:
Italics
indicates
statutory
language.
SUBPART
A:
INTRODUCTION
Section
742.110
Overview
of
Tiered
Approach
a)
This
Part
presents
an approach
for developing
remediation
objectives
(see
Appendix
A,
Illustrations
A
and
B)
that
include
an option
for exclusion
of
pathways
from further
consideration,
use of
area
background
concentrations
as
remediation
objectives
and three
tiers
for
selecting
applicable
remediation
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
objectives.
An
understanding
of
human
exposure
routes
is
necessary
to
properly
conduct
an evaluation
under
this
approach.
In
some
cases,
applicable
human
exposure
route(s)
can
be excluded
from
further
consideration
prior
to any
tier
evaluation.
Selecting
which
tier
or combination
of
tiers to
be used
to
develop
remediation
objectives
is dependent
on
the site-specific
conditions
and
remediation
goals.
Tier
1 evaluations
and
Tier
2 evaluations
are
not
prerequisites
to
conducting
Tier
3 evaluations.
b)
A
Tier
1 evaluation
compares
the
concentration
of contaminants
detected
at a
site
to
the corresponding
remediation
objectives
for
residential
and
industriaL
t
commercial
properties
contained
in Appendix
B,
Tables
A, B,
C, D
a4
E
and
G.
To complete
a Tier
1 evaluation,
the
extent
and concentrations
of the
contaminants
of
concern,
the
groundwater
class,
the
land
use classification,
human
exposure
routes
at the
site, and,
if appropriate,
soil pH,
must
be
known.
If
remediation
objectives
are
developed
based
on industrial/commercial
property
use,
then
institutional
controls
under
Subpart
J
are required.
c)
A
Tier
2 evaluation
uses
the
risk
based
equations
from
the Soil
Screening
Level
(SSL
Model)
and Risk
Based
Corrective
Action
(RBCA
Model)
and
modified
Johnson
and Ettinger
Model
(J
&
E Model)
documents
listed
in Appendix
C,
Tables
A ai4
C,
and
L respectively.
In addition
to
the
information
that
is
required
for
a Tier
1 evaluation,
site-specific
information
is
used to
calculate
Tier
2
remediation
objectives.
As in
Tier 1,
Tier 2
evaluates
residential
and
industrial/commercial
properties
only.
If
remediation
objectives
are
developed
based
on industrial/commercial
property
use,
then
institutional
controls
under
Subpart
J
are
required.
d)
A
Tier
3 evaluation
allows
alternative
parameters
and
factors,
not
available
under
a
Tier
1 or Tier
2 evaluation,
to
be
considered
when
developing
remediation
objectives.
Remediation
objectives
developed
for conservation
and
agricultural
properties
can
only
be developed
under
Tier
3.
e)
Remediation
objectives
may be
developed
using area
background
concentrations
or
any
of the
three
tiers if
the
evaluation
is conducted
in accordance
with
applicable
requirements
in
Subparts
D through
I.
When contaminant
concentrations
do not
exceed
remediation
objectives
developed
under
one
of
the
tiers
or area
background
procedures
under
Subpart
D,
further
evaluation
under
any
of the
other
tiers is
not
required.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective•
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.115
Key
Elements
To
develop
remediation
objectives
under
this
Part,
the
following key
elements
shall
be
addressed.
a)
Exposure Routes
1)
This
Part
identifies
the
following as potential
exposure
routes
to be
addressed:
A)
Outdoor
Inhalation;
Indoor
Inhalation;
C
B)
Soil
ingestion;
]
G)
Groundwater
ingestion; and
E
D)
Dermal
contact
with
soil.
2)
The
evaluation
of
exposure
routes
under
subsections
(a)(1
)(A),(a)(
1
)(B),
and
(a)(1)(C)
and
(a)(1’j(D)
of
this
Section
is
required
for
all
sites
when
developing
remediation
objectives
or excluding
exposure
pathways.
Evaluation
of the
dermal
contact
exposure
route
is
required
for
use
of
RBCA
equations
in
Appendix
C,
Table
C
or
use
of
formal
risk
assessment
under
Section
742.9
15.
3)
The
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
is comprised
of
two
components:
A)
Migration
from
soil
to groundwater
(soil
component);
and
B)
Direct
ingestion
of
groundwater
(groundwater
component).
4
The
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
is
comprised
of
two
components:
Migration
from
soil
through
soil
gas
to
indoor
air
(soil
component);
and
Migration
from
groundwater
through
soil
gas to
indoor
air
(groundwater
component).
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
b)
Contaminants
of Concern
The
contaminants
of concern
to
be
remediated
depend
on
the
following:
1)
The
materials
and
wastes
managed
at
the
site;
2)
The
extent
of the
no
further
remediation
determination
being
requested
from
the
Agency
pursuant
to
a
specific
program;
and
3)
The
requirements
applicable
to the
specific
program, as listed
at
Section
742.105(b)
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
c)
Land
Use
The
present
and
post-remediation
uses
of
the
site
where
exposures
may
occur
shall
be
evaluated.
The
land
use
of
a
site,
or
portion
thereof,
shall
be
classified
as
one
of
the
following:
1)
Residential
property;
2)
Conservation
property;
3)
Agricultural
property;
or
4)
Jndustriallcommercial
property.
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
B:
GENERAL
Section
742.200
Definitions
Except
as
stated
in
this
Section,
or
unless
a
different
meaning
of
a
word
or
term
is clear
from
the
context,
the
definition
of
words
or
terms
in
this
Part
shall
be the
same
as that
applied
to
the
same
words
or
terms
in the
Act.
“Act” means
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act
[415
ILCS
5].
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“ADL”
means
Acceptable
Detection
Limit,
which
is
the detectable
concentration
of
a substance
that
is
equal
to
the
lowest
appropriate
Practical
Quantitation
Limit
(PQL)
as
defined
in
this
Section.
“Agency”
means
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency.
“Agricultural Property”
means
any
real
property
for
which
its
present
or
post
remediation
use
is
for
growing
agricultural
crops
for
food
or
feed
either
as
harvested
crops,
cover
crops
or
as pasture.
This
definition
includes,
-but
is
not
limited
to,
properties
used
for
confinement
or
grazing
of
livestock
or poultry
and
for
silviculture
operations.
Excluded
from
this
definition
are
farm
residences,
farm
outbuildings
and
agrichemical facilities.
“Aquifer” means
saturated
(with
groundwater)
soils
and
geologic
materials
which
are
sufficiently
permeable
to
readily
yield
economically
useful
quantities
of
water
to
wells,
springs, or
streams
under
ordinary
hydraulic
gradients.
(Illinois
Groundwater
Protection
Act
[415
ILCS
5 5/3(a)])
“Area
Background”
means
concentrations
of
regulated
substances
that
are
consistently
present
in the
environment
in
the
vicinity
ofa
site
that
are
the
result
of
natural
conditions or
human
activities,
and
not
the result
solely
ofreleases
at
the
site.
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“ASTM”
means
the
American
Society
for
Testing
and
Materials.
“Board”
means
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board.
“Building”
means
a
man-made
structure with
an
enclosing roof
and
enclosing
walls,
except
for
windows
and
doors,
that
is
intended
for
or
supports
any
human
occupancy
for
more
than
six
consecutive
months.
“Building Control
Technology”
means
any
technology,
barrier
or
geologic
material
that
affects
air
flow
or
air
pressure
within
a building
for
purposes
of
reducing
contaminant
migration
to
the
indoor
air.
“Cancer Risk”
means
a
unitless
probability
of
an
individual
developing
cancer
from
a
defined
exposure
rate
and
frequency.
“Cap”
means
a barrier
designed
to
prevent
the
infiltration
of
precipitation
or
other
surface
water,
or
impede
the ingestion
or
inhalation
of
contaminants.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“Carcinogen”
means
a
contaminant
that is
classified
as a
category
Al
or A2
carcinogen
by the
American
Conference
of Governmental
Industrial
Hygienists,
a
category
1 or
2A/2B
carcinogen
by
the World
Health
Organization
International
Agency
for
Research
on
Cancer;
a “human
carcinogen”
or
“anticzpated
human
carcinogen”
by
the United
States
Department
of
Health
and Human
Service
National
Toxicological
Program;
or a category
A or
B1/B2
carcinogen
by
the
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency
in the
integrated
risk
information
system
or
afinal
rule
issued in
a Federal
Register
notice
by the
USEPA.
[415
ILCS
5/5 8.2]
“Class
I
Groundwater”
means
groundwater
that
meets
the
Class
I:
Potable
Resource
Groundwater
criteria
set forth
in 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code 620.
“Class
II
Groundwater”
means
groundwater
that meets
the
Class
II: General
Resource
Groundwater
criteria
set
forth
in
35 Ill.
Adm. Code
620.
“Conservation
Property”
means
any
real property
for
which
present
or post
remediation
use is
primarily
for
wildlife
habitat.
“Construction Worker”
means
a person
engaged
on
a
temporary
basis
to
perform
work
involving
invasive
construction
activities
including,
but
not
limited
to,
personnel
performing
demolition,
earth-moving,
building,
and
routine
and
emergency
utility
installation
or
repair activities.
“Contaminant of Concern”
or “Regulated
Substance
of
Concern”
means
any
contaminant
that
is
expected
to
be present
at
the site
based
upon
past
and
current
land
uses and
associated
releases
that
are
known
to
the
person
conducting
a
remediation
based
upon
reasonable
inquiry
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“County
highway”
means
county
highway
as
defined
in
the
Illinois
Highway
Code,
[605
ILCS
5].
“District
road”
means
district
road
as
defined
in the
Illinois
Highway
Code,
[605
ILCS
5].
“Engineered
Barrier”
means
a barrier
designed
or
verified
using
engineering
practices
that limits
exposure
to or
controls
migration
of
the contaminants
of
concern.
“Environmental Land
Use
Control”
means
an
instrument
that
meets the
requirements
of
this Part
and
is
placed
in
the
chain
of
title
to real
property
that
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
limits
or
places
requirements
upon
the
use
of the
property
for
the
purpose
of
protecting
human
health
or
the
environment,
is
binding
upon
the
property
owner,
heirs,
successors,
assigns,
and
lessees,
and
runs
in
perpetuity
or until
the
Agency
approves, in
writing, removal
of the
limitation
or
requirement
from
the
chain
of
title.
“Exposure
Route”
means
the
transport
mechanism
by
which
a
contaminant
of
concern
reaches
a
receptor.
“Federally
Owned
Property”
means
real
property
owned
in
fee
by
the
United
States
of America
on
which
institutional
controls are
sought to be
placed
in
accordance
with
this
Subpart.
“Federal
Landholding
Entity” means
that
federal
department,
agency,
or
instrumentality
with
the
authority
to occupy
and
control
the
day-to-day
use,
operation
and
management
of Federally
Owned
Property.
“Free
Product” means
a
contaminant
that
is present
as
a non-aqueous
phase
liquid
for
chemicals
whose
melting
point
is
less
than
300
C
(e.g.,
liquid
not
dissolved
in
water).
“GIS”
means
Geographic
Information
System.
“GPS”
means
Global
Positioning
System.
“Groundwater”
means underground
water
which
occurs
within
the
saturated
zone
and
geologic
materials
where
thefluid
pressure
in the
pore
space
is
equal
to
or
greater
than
atmospheric
pressure.
[415
ILCS
5/3.64]
“Groundwater
Quality
Standards”
means
the
standards
for
groundwater
as
set
forth
in
35 Iii.
Adm.
Code
620.
“Hazard
Quotient”
means
the
ratio
of
a
single
substance
exposure
level
during
a
specified
time
period
to
a
reference
dose
for
that
substance
derived
from
a
similar
exposure
period.
“Highway”
means
any
public
way
for
vehicular
travel
which
has
been
laid
out
in
pursuance
of
any
law
ofthis
State,
or
of
the
Territory
of
Illinois,
or
which
has
been
established
by
dedication,
or
used
by
the
public
as a
highway
for
15
years,
or which
has
been
or
may
be
laid
out and
connect
a
subdivision
or
platted
land
with
a
public
highway
and
which
has
been
dedicated
for
the use
of
the
owners
of
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
the
land included
in
the
subdivision
or
platted
land
where
there
has
been
an
acceptance
and
use
under
such
dedication
by such
owners,
and
which
has
not
been
vacated
in
pursuance
oflaw.
The term
“highway”
includes
rights
of
way,
bridges,
drainage
structures,
signs,
guard
rails,
protective
structures
and
all
other
structures
and
appurtenances
necessaiy
or convenient
for
vehicular
traffic.
A
highway
in
a
rural
area
may
be called
a
“road”,
while
a highway
in
a
municipal
area
may
be called
a
“street”.
(Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
JECS
5/2-202])
“Highway
Authority”
means
the Department
of
Transportation
with
respect
to
a
State
highway;
the
Illinois
State
Toll
Highway
with
respect
to a
toll
highway;
the
County
Board
with
respect
to
a county
highway
or a
county
unit
district
road
fa
discretionaryfunction
is
involved
and
the
County
Superintendent
of
Highways
fa
ministerialfunction
is involved;
the Highway
Commissioner
with
respect
to
a
township
or district
road
not in
a county
unit
road
district;
or the
corporate
authorities
ofa
municzpality
with
respect
to
a
municipal
street.
(Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
ILCS
5/2-213])
“Human
Exposure
Pathway”
means
a physical
condition
which
may
allow
for
a
risk
to human
health
based
on the
presence
of all
of
the
following:
contaminants
of
concern;
an
exposure
route;
and
a receptor
activity
at the point
of exposure
that
could
result
in contaminant
of
concern
intake.
“Industrial/Commercial
Property”
means
any
real property
that
does not
meet
the
definition
of
residential
property,
conservation
property
or
agricultural
property.
“Infiltration”
means
the amount
of water
entering
into
the ground
as a result
of
precipitation.
“Institutional
Control”
means
a legal
mechanism
for
imposing
a restriction
on
land
use, as
described
in Subpart
J.
“Land
Use Control
Memoranda
of
Agreement”
mean
agreements
entered
into
between
one
or more
agencies
of the
United
States
and
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
that
limit or
place requirements
upon
the
use
of Federally
Owned
Property
for
the purpose
of protecting
human
health
or the
environment.
“Man-Made
Pathways”
means
constructed
physical
conditions
that may
allow
for
the
transport
of
regulated
substances
including,
but
not limited
to, sewers,
utility
lines,
utility
or
elevator
vaults,
building
foundations,
basements,
crawl
spaces,
drainage
ditches,
or previously
excavated
andfilled
areas,
or
sumps.
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“Natural
Pathways”
means
natural
physical
conditions
that
may
allowfor
the
transport
of
regulated
substances
including,
but
not
limited
to, soil,
groundwater,
sand
seams
and
lenses,
and gravel
seams
and
lenses.
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“Person”
means
an individual,
trust,
firm,
joint
stock
company,
joint
venture,
consortium,
commercial
entity,
corporation
(including
a
government
corporation),
partnership,
association,
state,
municzpality,
commission,
political
subdivision
of
a
state,
or
any
interstate
body
including
the
United
States
government
and
each
department,
agency,
and instrumentality
of
the
United
States.
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“Point
of Human
Exposure”
means
the
points
at
which
human
exposure
to
a
contaminant
of concern may
reasonably
be
expected
to occur.
The
point
of
human
exposure
is at
the
source,
unless
an
institutional
control
limiting
human
exposure
for
the
applicable
exposure
route
has
been
or will
be
in place,
in
which
case
the point
of
human
exposure
will
be the
boundary
of
the
institutional
control.
Point
of
human
exposure
may
be at
a different
location
than
the point
of
compliance.
“Populated
Area”
means
an area
within
the boundaries
of
a municipality
that
has
a
population
of
10,000
or
greater
based
on the
year
2000
or
most
recent
census;
or
an
area less
than
three
miles
from
the
boundary
of
a municipality
that
has
a
population
of
10,000
or
greater
based
on the
year
2000
or
most
recent
census.
“Potable”
means
generally
fitfor
human
consumption
in
accordance
with
accepted
water
supply
principles
and
practices.
(Illinois
Groundwater
Protection
Act [415
ILCS
55/3(h)])
“PQL”
means
practical
quantitation
limit
or estimated
quantitation
limit,
which
is
the
lowest
concentration
that
can be
reliably
measured
within
specified
limits
of
precision
and
accuracy
for
a specific
laboratory
analytical
method
during
routine
laboratory
operating
conditions
in
accordance
with
“Test
Methods
for
Evaluating
Solid
Wastes,
Physical/Chemical
Methods”,
EPA
Publication
No.
SW-846,
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.210.
When
applied
to filtered
water
samples,
PQL
includes
the
method
detection
limit
or estimated
detection
limit
in
accordance
with
the applicable
method
revision
in:
“Methods
for
the
Determination
of Organic
Compounds
in
Drinking
Water”,
Supplement
II”,
EPA
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE OF
PROPOSED
AMENIMENTS
Publication
No.
EPAJ600/4-88/039;
“Methods
for
the
Determination
of Organic
Compounds
in
Drinking
Water,
Supplement
III”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/600/R-95/131,
all
of which
are
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.210.
“RBCA”
means
Risk
Based
Corrective
Action
as
defined
in
ASTM
E-1739-95,
as
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.2
10.
“RCRA”
means
the
Resource
Conservation
and
Recovery
Act
of
1976
(42
U.S.C.
6921).
“Reference
Concentration”
or
“RfC”
means
an
estimate
of a
daily
exposure,
in
units
of
milligrams
of
chemical
per
cubic
meter
of
air
(mg/m(3)),
to the
human
population
(including
sensitive
subgroups)
that
is
likely
to
be
without
appreciable
risk
of
deleterious
effects
during
a portion
of
a
lifetime
(up
to
approximately
seven
years,
subchronic)
or
for a
lifetime
(chronic).
“Reference
Dose”
or “RfD”
means
an
estimate
of a
daily
exposure,
in
units
of
milligrams
of
chemical
per
kilogram
of
body
weight
per
day
(mg/kg/d),
to
the
human
population
(including
sensitive
subgroups)
that
is
likely
to
be
without
appreciable
risk
of
deleterious effects
during
a
portion
of
a lifetime
(up
to
approximately
seven
years,
subchronic)
or
for
a
lifetime
(chronic).
“Regulated
Substance”
means
any
hazardous
substance
as
defined
under
Section
101(14)
of
the
Comprehensive
Environmental
Response,
Compensation,
and
Liability
Act
of1980
(F.L.
96-510)
and
petroleum
products
including
crude
oil
or
any
fraction
thereof
natural
gas,
natural
gas
liquids,
liquefied
natural
gas,
or
synthetic
gas
usable
for
fuel
(or
mixtures
of
natural
gas
and
such
synthetic
gas).
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“Residential
Property”
means
any
real
property
that
is used
for habitation
by
individuals,
or where children
have
the
opportunity
for
exposure
to
contaminants
through soil
ingestion
or inhalation
at
educational
facilities,
health
care
facilities,
child
care
facilities
or
outdoor
recreational
areas.
[415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“Right
of
Way”
means
the
land,
or
interest
therein,
acquiredfor
or
devoted
to
a
highway. (Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
ILCS
5/2-2
17])
“Similar-Acting
Chemicals”
are
chemical substances
that
have
toxic
or
harmful
effect
on
the
same
specific
organ
or
organ
system
(see
Appendix
A.Tables
E
and
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMEI\DMENTS
F
for a
list of
similar-acting
chemicals
with
noncarcinogenic
and
carcinogenic
effects).
“Site”
means
any single
location,
place,
tract
of
land or
parcel
ofproperty,
or
portion
thereof
including
contiguous
property
separated
by
a public
right-of-way.
415
ILCS
5/58.2]
“Slurry
Wall”
means
a
man-made
barrier
made
of
geologic
material
which
is
constructed
to prevent
or
impede
the
movement
of
contamination
into
a
certain
area.
“Soil
Gas”
means
the
air
existing
in
void
spaces
in the
soil
between
the
groundwater
table
and
the ground
surface.
“Soil
Saturation
Limit”
or
“Csat”
means
the contaminant
soil
pore
air
and
pore
water
are saturated
wnu
ule
chemicai
iiiu
me
adsorptive
limits
of
the
soil
particles
have
been
reached.
the
contaminant
concentration
at
which
the
absorptive
limits
of
the soil
particles,
the solubility
limits
of
the
available
soil
moisture,
and
saturation
of
soil pore
air
have
been
reached.
Above
the
soil saturation
concentration,
the
assumptions
regarding
vapor
transport
to
air
and/or
dissolved
phase
transport
to
groundwater
(for
chemicals
which
are
liquid
at
ambient
soil
temperatures)
do
not
apply,
and
alternative
modeling
approaches
are
required.
“Soil
Vapor
Saturation
Limit”
or
means
the
maximum
vapor
concentration
that
can
exist
in the
soil
pore
air at
a
given
temperature
and
pressure.
“Solubility”
means
a chemical
specific maximum
amount
of
solute
that
can
dissolve
in
a specific
amount
of solvent
(groundwater)
at a specific
temperature.
“SPLP”
means
Synthetic
Precipitation
Leaching
Procedure
(Method
1312)
as
published
in
“Test
Methods
for
Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods”,
USEPA
Publication
No. SW-846,
as
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.2
10.
“SSL”
means
Soil
Screening
Levels
as
defined
ih
USEPA’s
Soil
Screening
Guidance:
User’s
Guide
and
Technical
Background
Document,
as
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.210.
“State
highway”
means
state
highway
as defined
in
the
Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
ILCS
5].
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“Stratigraphic
Unit”
means
a
site-specific
geologic
unit
of
native
deposited
material
and/or
bedrock
of
varying
thickness
(e.g.,
sand,
gravel,
silt,
clay,
bedrock, etc.).
A
change
in
stratigraphic
unit
is recognized
by
a clearly
distinct
contrast
in geologic
material
or
a
change
in
physical
features within
a zone
of
gradation. For
the
purposes
of
this
Part,
a change
in
stratigraphic
unit
is
identified
by
one
or
a combination
of differences
in physical
features
such
as
texture,
cementation,
fabric,
composition,
density,
and/or
permeability
of
the
native
material
and/or
bedrock.
“Street”
means
street
as
defined
in the
Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
ILCS
5].
“TCLP”
means
Toxicity
Characteristic
Leaching
Procedure
(Method
1311)
as
published in
“Test
Methods
for Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods”, USEPA
Publication
No.
SW-846,
as incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.210.
“Toll
highway”
means
toll
highway
as
defined
in
the
Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
ILCS
5].
“Total
Petroleum
Hydrocarbon
(TPH)”
means
the
additive
total
of all
petroleum
hydrocarbons
found
in an
analytical
sample.
“Township
road”
means
township
road
as
defined
in the
Illinois
Highway
Code
[605
ILCS
5].
“Volatile Chemicals”
means
chemicals
with
a Dimensionless
Henry’s
Law
Constant
of
greater
than
1.9 x
1
02
or
a vapor
pressure
greater
than
0.1
Torr
(mniHg) at 25°C.
For
purposes
of
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
elemental
mercury
is included in
this
definition.
“Volatile
Organic
Compounds
(VOCs)”
means
organic
chemical
analytes
identified
as
volatiles
as
published
in
“Test
Methods for
Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods”,
USEPA
Publication
No.
SW
846
(incorporated-by
reference in
Section
742.210),
method
numbers
8011,
8015B,
8021B,
8031,
8260B,
831
5A,
and
83
16. For
analytes
not
listed
in any
category
in
those
methods,
those
analytes
which
have
a
boiling
point
less
than
200°
C
and
a
vapor
pressure
greater
than
0.1
Toff
(
Hg)
at 20°
C.
(Source: Amended at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.2
10
Incorporations
by Reference
a)
The
Board
incorporates
the following
material
by
reference:
Agency
for
Toxic
Substances
and Disease
Registry
(ATSDR)
Minimal
Risk
Levels
(MRLs),
U.S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
1600 Clifton
Road,
Mailstop
F32,
Atlanta,
Georgia
30333,
(770) 488-3357
(December
2006).
ASTM.
American
Society for
Testing
and
Materials
International,
100
Barr
Harbor
Drive,
West
Conshohocken,
PA
19428-2959.
(610)
832-9585.
ASTM
D 2974-00,
Standard
Test
Methods
for
Moisture,
Ash
and
Organic
Matter
of Peat
and Other
Organic
Soils,
approved
August 10,
2000.
ASTM
D 248
8-00, Standard
Practice
for
Description
and
Identification
of
Soils
(Visual-Manual
Procedure),
approved
February
10, 2000.
ASTM
D
15 56-00,
Standard
Test Method
for
Density
and Unit
Weight
of
Soil in
Place by the
Sand-Cone
Method,
approved
March
10, 2000.
ASTM
D 2
167-94,
Standard
Test
Method
for Density
and
Unit
Weight
of
Soil
in Place
by the
Rubber
Balloon
Method,
approved
March
15,
1994.
ASTM
D 2922-01,
Standard
Test
Methods
for Density
of
Soil and
Soil-
Aggregate
in
Place
by Nuclear
Methods
(Shallow
Depth),
approved
June
10, 2001.
ASTM
D 2937-OOel,
Standard Test
Method
for
Density
of Soil
in
Place
by
the
Drive-Cylinder
Method,
approved
June
10,
2000.
ASTM
D 854-02,
Standard
Test
Methods
for Specific
Gravity
of
Soil
Solids
by Water
Pycnometer,
approved
July 10,
2002.
ASTM
D 22
16-98,
Standard
Test
Method
for
Laboratory
Determination
of
Water
(Moisture)
Content
of Soil
and
Rock
by
Mass, approved
February
10, 1998.
ASTM
D 4959-00,
Standard
Test
Method
for
Determination
of
Water
(Moisture)
Content
of
Soil by Direct
Heating,
approved
March
10,
2000.
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
ASTM
D 4643-00,
Standard
Test
Method
for
Determination
of
Water
(Moisture)
Content
of
Soil
by
the
Microwave
Oven
Method,
approved
February
10, 2000.
ASTM
D
5084-03,
Standard
Test
Methods
for
Measurement
of
Hydraulic
Conductivity
of Saturated Porous
Materials Using
a
Flexible
Wall
Permeameter,
approved
November
1, 2003.
ASTM
D
422-63
(2002),
Standard
Test
Method
for
Particle-Size
Analysis
of Soils,
approved
November
10,
2002.
ASTM
D
1140-00,
Standard
Test
Methods
for
Amount
of
Material
in
Soils
Finer
than
the
No.
200
(75
pin)
Sieve,
approved
June
10,
2000.
ASTM
D 3017-01,
Standard
Test
Method for
Water
Content
of
Soil
and
Rock
in Place
by
Nuclear
Methods
(Shallow
Depth),
approved
June
10,
2001.
ASTM
D
4525-90
(2001),
Standard
Test
Method
for
Permeability
of
Rocks
by
Flowing
Air,
approved
May
25,
1990.
ASTM
D
2487-00,
Standard
Classification of
Soils
for
Engineering
Purposes
(Unified
Soil
Classification
System),
approved
March
10,
2000.
ASTM
D 1945-03,
Standard
Test
Method
for
Analysis
of
Natural
Gas by
Gas
Chromatography,
approved
May
10,
2003
ASTM
D
1946-90,
Standard Practice
for
Analysis
of
Reformed
Gas
by
Gas
Chromatography,
approved
June
1, 2006
ASTM
E 1527-00,
Standard
Practice
for
Environmental
Site
Assessments:
Phase
I
Environmental
Site
Assessment
Process,
approved
May
10,
2000.
Vol.
11.04.
ASTM
B
1739-95
(2002),
Standard
Guide
for Risk-Based
Corrective
Action
Applied
at Petroleum Release
Sites,
approved
September
10,
1995.
ASTM
E
2121-03,
Standard
Practice
for
Installing
Radon
Mitigation
Systems
in
Existing
Low-Rise
Residential
Buildings,
approved
February
10,
2003.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
ASTM
E 2600-08,
Standard
Practice
for Assessment
for
Vapor
Intrusion
into
Structures
on
Property
Involved
in
Real
Estate
Transactions,
approved
March
7, 2008.
Barnes,
Donald
G.
and Dourson,
Michael.
(1988).
Reference
Dose
(RiD):
Description and
Use
in
Health
Risk
Assessments.
Regulatory
Toxicology
and
Pharmacology.
8,
47 1-486.
EPRI.
Electric
Power
Research
Institute.
3420
Hiliview
Avenue,
Palo
Alto,
California
94304.
(650)
855-2121.
Polycyclic
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
(PAHs)
in Surface
Soil
in
Illinois:
Background
PARs,
EPRI,
Palo
Alto,
CA,
We
Energies,
Milwaukee,
WI,
and
IEPA,
Springfield,
IL: 2004.
1011376.
“Reference
Handbook
for
Site-Specific
Assessment
of Subsurface
Vapor
Intrusion
to Indoor
Air,”
Electric
Power
Research
Institute
(EPRI),
Inc.,
Program
No.
1008492,
(March 2005).
GPO.
Superintendent
of
Documents,
U.S.
Government
Printing
Office,
Washington,
DC
20401,
(202)
783-3238.
USEPA
Guidelines
for
Carcinogenic
Risk
Assessment,
51
Fed.
Reg.
33992-34003
(September
24,
1986).
“Test
Methods
for
Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods!!,
USEPA
Publication
number
SW-846
(Third
Edition,
Final
Update
lilA,
April
1998),
as amended
by
Updates
I, HA,
III,
and
lIlA
(Document
No.
955-001-00000-1).
“Methods
for the
Determination
of
Organic
Compounds
in Drinking
Water”,
EPA
Publication
No. EPA/600/4-88/039
(December
1988
(Revised
July
1991)).
“Methods
for
the
Determination
of Organic
Compounds
in Drinking
Water,
Supplement
I”,
EPA Publication
No.
EPA/600/4-90/020
(July
1990).
“Methods
for
the
Determination
of Organic
Compounds
in
Drinking
Water,
Supplement
II”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/600/R-92/129
(August
1992).
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“Methods
for
the
Determination
of
Organic
Compounds
in Drinking
Water,
Supplement
III”, EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/600/R-95/13
1
(August
1995).
“Guidance
for
Data Quality
Assessment,
Practical
Methods
for
Data
Analysis,
EPA
QA/G-9,
QAOO
Update,”
EPAI600tR-96/084
(July
2000).
Available
at
www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g9-final.pdf.
“Assessment
of Vapor
Intrusion
in Homes
Near
the
Raymark
Superfund
Site
Using
Basement
and
Sub-Slab
Air Samples”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/600/R-
05/147
(March
2006).
“Model
Standards
and Techniques
for
Control
of Radon
in
New
Residential
Buildings”
EPA
Publication
No. EPA/402/R-94/009
(March
1994).
IRIS.
Integrated
Risk Information
System,
National
Center
for
Environmental
Assessment,
U.S.
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
26
West Martin
Luther
King
Drive,
MS-190,
Cincinnati,
OH 45268,
(513)
569-7254.
“Reference
Dose
(RfD):
Description
and
Use in
Health
Risk
Assessments”,
Background
Document
1A
(March
15,
1993).
“EPA
Approach
for
Assessing
the
Risks
Associated
with Chronic
Exposures
to
Carcinogens”,
Background
Document
2
(January
17,
1992).
Johnson,
Paul
C.
(2005).
Identification
of Application
Specific
Critical
Inputs
for
the
1991
Johnson
and
Ettinger
Vapor
Intrusion
Algorithm.
Ground
Water
Monitoring
and
Remediation.
25(1),
63-78.
Murray,
Donald
M.
and
Burmaster,
David
E.
(1995).
Residential
Air
Exchapg
Rates
in the
United
States:
Empirical
and
Estimated
Parametric
Distributions
b1
Season
and Climatic
Region.
Risk
Analysis.
15(4),
459-465.
Nelson,
D.W.,
and
L.E. Sommers
(1982).
Total
carbon,
organic
carbon,
and
organic
matter.
In:
A.L.
Page
(ed.),
Methods
of Soil
Analysis.
Part
2.
Chemical
and
Microbiological
Properties.
2nd
Edition,
pp.
539-579,
American
Society
of
Agronomy.
Madison,
WI.
NTIS.
National
Technical
Information
Service,
5285
Port
Royal
Road,
Springfield,
VA
22161,
(703)
487-4600.
ILL1NOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“Calculating
Upper
Confidence Limits
for
Exposure Point
Concentrations
at
Hazardous
Waste
Sites,”
USEPA
Office
of
Emergency
and
Remedial
Response,
OSWER 9285.6-10
(December
2002),
PB
2003-104982.
“Evaluating
the
Vapor
Intrusion
to Indoor
Air
Pathway
from
Groundwater
and
Soils,”
OSWER Draft
Guidance.
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/530D-
02/004
(November
2002).
“Exposures
Factors
Handbook,
Vol.
I: General
Factors”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA!600/P-95/OO2Fa
(August
1997).
“Exposures
Factors
Handbook,
Vol.
II:
Food
Ingestion
Factors”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPAJ600/P-95/OO2Fb
(August
1997).
“Exposures
Factors
Handbook,
Vol.
ifi:
Activity
Factors”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPAI600IP-95/OO2Fc
(August
1997).
“Risk
Assessment
Guidance
for
Superfund,
Vol.
I:;
Human
Health
Evaluation
Manual,
Supplemental
Guidance:
Standard
Default
Exposure
Factors”,
OSWER Directive
9285.6-03 (March
1991).
“Rapid
Assessment
of
Exposure
to Particulate
Emissions
from
Surface
Contamination
Sites,”
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/600/8-85/002
(February
1985),
PB
85-192219.
“Risk
Assessment
Guidance
for
Superfund,
Volume
I;
Human
Health
Evaluation
Manual
(Part
A)”,
Interim
Final,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPAJ54O/1-89/002
(December
1989).
“Risk
Assessment
Guidance
for
Superfund,
Volume
I; Human
Health
Evaluation Manual,
Supplemental
Guidance,
Dermal
Risk
Assessment
Interim
Guidance”,
Draft
(August
18,
1992).
“Risk
Assessment
Guidance
for
Superfund,
Vol.
I:
Human
Health
Evaluation
Manual
(Part
E,
Supplemental
Guidance
for
Dermal
Risk
Assessment)
Interim”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPAJ54O/RJ99/005
(September
2001).
“Soil
Screening
Guidance:
Technical Background
Document”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA!540/R-95/128,
PB
96-963502
(May
1996).
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
“Soil
Screening
Guidance:
User’s
Guide”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/540/R-96/018,
PB
96-963505
(April
1996).
“Superfund
Exposure
Assessment
Manual”,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/540/1-88/001
(April
1988).
“Supplemental
Guidance
for Developing
Soil Screening
Levels
for
Superfund
Sites”,
OSWER
Directive
9355.4-24
(December
2002).
“Technical
Background
Document
for
Draft
Soil
Screening
Level
Framework,
Review
Draft,”
EPA
Publication
No.
EPAJ54O-R-94-106.
PB95-963532. (July
1994).
“Users
Guide
for
Evaluating
Subsurface
Vapor
Intrusion
into
Buildings,”
EPA.
EPAJ68/W-02/33,
(February
2004).
Polynuclear
Aromatic
Hydrocarbon
Background
Study
City
of
Chicago,
Tetra
Tech
Em
Inc., 200
E.
Randolph
Drive,
Suite
4700,
Chicago,
IL 60601,
February
24,
2003.
Polycyclic
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
PM{s)
in
Surface
Soil
ni Illinois:
Background
PAils,
EPRI,
Palo
Alto,
CA,
We
Energies,
Milwaukee,
WI,
and
IEPA,
Springfield,
IL:
2004.
1011376.
EPRI,
3412
Hillview
Avenue,
Palo
Altos
CA
94304,
(800)
313
3774.
RCRA
Facility
Investigation
Guidance,
Interim
Final,
developed
by
USEPA
(EPA
530/S
W-89-031),
4
volumes
(May
1989).
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Environmental
Information (2000).
“Guidance
for
Data
Quality
Assessment, Practical
Methods
for Data
Analysis,”
EPA
QAIG-9,
QAOO
update.
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/600/R-96-084.
(Available
online
at
www.epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdf/ucl.pdf).
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response
(2003).
“Human
Health
Toxicity
Values
in
Superfund
Risk
Assessments,”
OSWER Directive
9285.7-53. (Available
online
at
http
://www.
epa. gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdflhhmemo.pdf).
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Compendium
of Methods
for
Determination
of
Toxic
Organic
Compounds
in
Ambient
Air,
Second
Edition,
EPA
Publication
No.
EPA/625/R-96/0
lOb,
January
1999
available
at
http
://www.epa.
gov/ttnamti
1/files/ambient/airtox/tocomp99.pdf
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
Test
Methods
for
Evaluating
Solid
Waste,
Physical/Chemical
Methods,
SW-846 through
Revision
IVB
(February
2007)
available
at
http://www.epa.gov/sw-846/main.htm
United
States
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
CFR
Promulgated
Test
Methods,
Methods
3C
and
16,
Technology
Transfer
Network, Emission
Measurement
Center, (2007)
available
at http
://www.epa.
gov/ttnlemc/promgate.html
“Vapor Intrusion
Pathway: A
Practical
Guide,”
Technical
and
Regulatory
Guidance.
Interstate
Technology
and
Regulatory
Council
(January
2007).
b)
CFR
(Code
of
Federal
Regulations).
Available
from
the Superintendent
of
Documents,
U.S.
Government
Printing
Office,
Washington,
D.C.
20402
(202)783-3238:
40
CFR
761
(1998).
c)
This
Section
incorporates
no
later
editions
or
amendments.
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.220
Determination
of Soil
Saturation
Limit
a)
For
any
organic
contaminant
that
has
a
melting
point
below
3
0°C,
the
remediation
objective
for
the
outdoor
and
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
developed
under
Tier
2
shall
not
exceed
the
soil
saturation
limit,
as
determined
under
subsection
(c)
of
this
Section.
b)
For
any
organic
contaminant
that
has
a
melting
point
below
30°C,
the
remediation
objective under
Tier
2 for
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure route
shall
not
exceed
the
soil
saturation
limit,
as
determined
under
subsection
(c) of
this
Section.
c)
The
soil
saturation
limit
shall
be:
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
1)
The
value
listed
in
Appendix
A, Table
A
for that
specific
contaminant.
For
the indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
the
value
listed
in
Appendix
A,
Table
L
shall
be
uscjj
2)
A
value
derived
from
Equation
S29
in Appendix
C,
Table
A-ef.
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
the value
derived
from
Equation
J&E6a
in
Appendix
C,
Table
L
shall
be
used:
or
3)
A
value
derived
from
another
method
approved
by
the Agency.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.222
Determination
of Soil
Vapor
Saturation
Limit
For
any
volatile
chemical,
the
soil
gas
remediation
objective
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
developed
under
Tier 2
shall
not exceed
the
soil
vapor
saturation
limit,
as determined
under
subsection
(b)
of
this
Section.
The
soil
vapor
saturation
limit
shall
be:
1)
The
value
listed
in Appendix
A,
Table
K
for
that
specific
contaminant:
2)
A
value
derived
from
Equation
J&E6b
in Appendix
C,
Table
L:
or
3)
A
value
derived
from
another
method
approved
by
the
Agency.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.225
Demonstration
of
Compliance with
Remediation
Objectives
Compliance
is
achieved
if each
sample
result
does
not exceed
that
respective
remediation
objective
unless
a person
elects
to
proceed
under
subsections
(c),
(d)
and
(e)
of
this
Section.
a)
Compliance
with
groundwater
remediation
objectives
developed
under
Subparts
D
through
F
and
H through
I shall
be
demonstrated
by
comparing
the
contaminant
concentrations
of
discrete
samples
at
each
sample
point
to the
applicable
groundwater remediation
objective.
Sample
points
shall
be
determined
by
the
program
under
which
remediation
is performed.
b)
Unless
the
person
elects
to
composite
samples
or
average
sampling
results
as
provided
in
subsections
(c)
and
(d) of
this
Section,
compliance
with
soil
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
remediation
objectives
developed
under
Subparts
D
through
G
and
I
shall
be
demonstrated
by
comparing
the
contaminant
concentrations
of
discrete
samples
to
the
applicable
soil
remediation
objective.
1)
Except
as
provided
in
subsections
(c) and
(d)
of this
Section,
compositing
of samples
is not
allowed.
2)
Except
as provided
in
subsections
(c)
and
(d) of
this Section,
averaging
of
sample
results
is
not
allowed.
3)
Notwithstanding
subsections
(c)
and
(d) of
this Section,
compositing
of
samples
and averaging
of sample
results
is
not allowed
for the
construction
worker
population.
4)
The number
of
sampling
points
required
to
demonstrate
compliance
is
determined
by
the requirements
applicable
to
the
program
under
which
remediation
is
performed.
Except
as
determined
through
a
plan approved
by
the Agency
in
Tier
3,
compositing
and
averaging
of
sample
results
are not
allowed
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
c)
If
a person
chooses
to
composite
soil
samples
or
average
soil sample
results
to
demonstrate
compliance
relative
to
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route,
the
following
requirements
apply:
1)
A
minimum
of
two sampling
locations
for
every
0.5 acre
of
contaminated
area is
required,
with
discrete
samples
at
each
sample
location
obtained
at
every two
feet
of depth,
beginning
at
six
inches
below
the ground
surface
for surface
contamination
and
at the
upper
limit
of contamination
for
subsurface
contamination
and
continuing
through
the
zone
of
contamination.
Alternatively,
a sampling
method
may
be approved
by
the
Agency
based
on an
appropriately
designed
site-specific
evaluation.
Samples
obtained
at or below
the
water
table
shall
not be
used in
compositing or averaging.
2)
For
contaminants
of
concern
other
than volatile
organic
contaminants
chemicals:
A)
Discrete
samples
from
the
same
boring
may
be
composited;
or
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
B)
Discrete
sample
results
from
the
same
boring
may
be averaged.
3)
For volatile
organic
contaminants
chemicals:
A)
Compositing
of
samples
is
not allowed.
B)
Discrete
sample
results
from
the
same
boring
may
be
averaged.
4)
Composite
samples
may
not
be
averaged.
An
arithmetic
average
may
be
calculated
for discrete
samples
collected
at
every
two
feet
of depth
through
the
zone
of contamination
as
specified
above
in Section
742.225(c)(1)
of
this Section.
d)
If
a person
chooses
to composite
soil
samples
or average
soil
sample
results
to
demonstrate
compliance
relative
to the
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
or
ingestion
exposure
routes,
the
following
requirements
apply:
1)
A person
shall submit
a
sampling
plan
for
Agency
approval,
based
upon
a
site-specific
evaluation;
2)
For volatile
organic
compounds
chemicals,
compositing
of
samples
is
not
allowed;
and
3)
All
samples
shall
be collected
within
the
contaminated
area.
4)
Composite
samples
may
not
be averaged.
Procedures
specified
in
“Calculating
Upper
Confidence
Limits
for
Exposure
Point
Concentrations
at
Hazardous
Waste
Sites”,
USEPA
Office
of
Emergency
and
Remedial
Response,
OSWER
9285.6-10
(December
2002),
as incorporated
by
reference
in Section
742.210,
or an
alternative
procedure
approved
by
the
Agency,
shall be
used
to determine
sample
averages.
e)
When
averaging
under
this
Section,
if no
more
than
15% of
sample
results
are
reported
as
“non-detect”,
“no contamination”,
“below
detection
limits”,
or
similar
terms,
such
results
shall
be
included
in
the averaging
calculations
as one-half
the
reported
analytical
detection
limit
for
the
contaminant.
However,
when
performing
a
test
for normal
or
lognormal
distribution
for
the purpose
of
calculating
a 95%
Upper
Confidence
Limit
of the mean
for
a contaminant,
a
person
may
substitute
for
each
non-detect
value a
randomly
generated
value
between,
but not
including,
zero
and
the reported
analytical
detection
limit.
If
more
than
15%
of
sample
results
are
“non-detect”,
procedures
specified
in
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
“Guidance
for
Data
Quality
Assessment,
Practical
Methods
for
Data
Analysis,
EPA
QAJG-9,
QAOO
Update”, EPA!600/R-96/084
(July
2000),
as
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.2
10,
or
an
alternative
procedure
approved
by
the
Agency
shall
be
used
to address
the
non-detect
values,
or
another
statistically
valid
procedure
approved
by
the
Agency
may
be
used
to
determine
an
average.
f)
All
soil
samples
collected after
August
15,
2001,
shall
be
reported
on
a dry
weight
basis
for the
purpose
of
demonstrating
compliance,
with
the exception
of
the
TCLP
and
SPLP
and
the
property
pH.
(Source:
Amended
at
Reg.
effective
Section 742.227
Demonstration
of
Compliance with
Soil
Gas
Remediation
Objectives
for
the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
Compliance
shall
be
demonstrated
by
comparing
the
contaminant
concentrations
of
discrete
samples
at
each
sample point
to
the applicable
soil
gas
remediation
objective
contained
in
Appendix
B,
Table
G.
Sample
points
shall
be
determined
by
the program
under
which
remediation
is
performed.
)
When
collecting
soil
gas
samples:
1)
Use
rigid-wall
tubing
made
of nylon
or Teflon®
or
other
material
approved
by
the
Agency;
2)
Use
gas-tight,
inert
containers
to
hold
the
sample.
For
light
sensitive
or
halogenated
volatile
chemicals,
these
containers
shall
be
opaque
or
dark-
colored;
3)
Purge
three
volumes
before
obtaining
each
discrete
soil
gas
sample;
4)
Use
a tracer
of isopropyl
alcohol
or
other
leak
compound
approved
by
the
Agency;
and
5)
Limit
the
flow
rate
to
200
ml/min.
Soil
gas samples
shall
be analyzed
using
a National
Environmental
Laboratory
Accreditation
Program
(NELAP)
certified
laboratory.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Soil gas
remediation
objectives
shall
be compared
to
concentrations
of
soil
gas
collected
at a depth
at
least
3 feet
below
ground
surface
and above
the
saturated
zone.
(Source:
Added
at
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
C:
EXPOSURE
ROUTE
EVALUATIONS
Section
742.310
Outdoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
The
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
may
be
excluded
from
consideration
if:
a)
The requirements
of Sections
742.300
and 742.305
are
met;
b)
An approved
engineered
barrier
is in
place
that meets
the
requirements
of
Subpart
K;
c)
Safety
precautions
for
the
construction
worker
are
taken
if the
Tier
1
construction
worker
remediation
objectives
are exceeded;
and
d)
An
institutional
control,
in
accordance
with
Subpart
J, will
be
placed
on
the
property.
(Source:
Amended
at
Reg.
effective
Section
742.312
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
The
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
may
be
excluded
from
consideration
if:
None
of
the contaminants
of concern
are
listed
on Appendix
A,
Table
J
and
none
of the
contaminants
of
concern
are
volatile
chemicals,
as
defined
in
Section
742.200;
or
The
following
requirements
in
subsections
(b)(1)(A)
or
(B),
and
(b)(2’)
and
(b)(3)
are
met:
No
building
or man-made
pathway
exists
or
will
be
placed
above
the
contaminated
soil
or
groundwater;
or
An
approved
building
control
technology
is
in place
that
meets
the
requirements
of Subpart
L;
and
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AME1DMENTS
The
requirements
of Sections
742.300
and
742.3
05 are
met
and
An
institutional
control,
in accordance
with
Subpart
J,
will
be
placed
on
the property.
(Source:
Added
at
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
D:
DETERMINING
AREA
BACKGROUND
Section
742.405
Determination
of
Area
Background
for
Soil
a)
Soil
sampling
results
shall
be
obtained
for
purposes
of determining
area
background
levels
in
accordance
with
the
following
procedures:
1)
For volatile
organic
contaminants
chemicals,
sample
results
shall
be
based
on discrete
samples;
2)
Unless
an
alternative
method
is
approved
by
the
Agency,
for
contaminants
other
than
volatile
organic
contaminants
chemicals,
sample
results
shall
be
based
on
discrete
samples
or
composite
samples.
If
a
person
elects
to
use
composite
samples,
each
0.5
acre
of the
area
to be
sampled
shall
be
divided
into
quadrants
and
5 aliquots
of
equal
volume
per quadrant
shall
be
composited
into
1 sample;
3)
Samples
shall
be
collected
from
similar
depths
and
soil
types,
which
shall
be consistent
with
the
depths
and
soil
types
in which
maximum
levels
of
contaminants
are
found
in the
areas
of
known
or
suspected
releases;
and
4)
Samples
shall
be
collected
from
areas
of the
site
or adjacent
to
the
site
that
are unaffected
by
known
or
suspected
releases
at
or
from
the
site.
If
the
sample
results
show
an impact
from
releases
at
or from
the
site,
then
the
sample
results
shall
not
be
included
in
determining
area
background
levels
under
this
Part.
b)
Area
background
shall
be
determined
according
to
one
of
the
following
approaches:
1)
Statewide
Area
Background
Approach:
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
A)
The
concentrations
of
inorganic
chemicals
in
background
soils
listed
in
Appendix
A,
Table
G may
be
used
as
the
upper
limit
of
the
area
background
concentration
for
the
site.
The
first
column
to
the
right
of
the
chemical
name
presents inorganic
chemicals
in
background
soils
for
counties
within
Metropolitan
Statistical
Areas.
Counties
within
Metropolitan
Statistical
Areas
are
identified
in
Appendix
A,
Table
G,
Footnote
a.
Sites
located
in
counties
outside
Metropolitan
Statistical
Areas
shall
use
the
concentrations
of
inorganic
chemicals
in background
soils
shown
in
the
second
column
to
the
right
of
the
chemical
name.
B)
Soil
area
background
concentrations
determined
according
to
this
statewide
area
background
approach
shall
be
used
as
provided
in
Section
742.415(b)
of
this
Part.
For
each
parameter
whose
sampling
results
demonstrate
concentrations
above
those
in
Appendix
A,
Table
G,
the
person
shall
develop
appropriate
soil
remediation
objectives
in
accordance
with
this
Part,
or may
determine
area
background
in
accordance
with
subsection
(b)(2)
of
this
Section.
2)
A
statistically
valid
approach
for
determining
area
background
concentrations
appropriate
for the
characteristics
of the
data
set,
and
approved
by
the
Agency.
(Source: Amended
at
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
E: TIER
1 EVALUATION
Section 742.500
Tier
1 Evaluation
Overview
a)
A
Tier
1
evaluation
compares
the
concentration
of
each
contaminant
of concern
detected at a
site
to
the
baseline
remediation
objectives
provided
in
Appendix
B,
Tables
A, B,
C,
D
and
E
and
G.
Use
of
Tier
1
remediation
objectives
requires
only
limited
site-specific
information:
concentrations
of
contaminants
of
concern,
groundwater
classification,
land
use
classification,
and,
if
appropriate,
soil
pH.
(See
Appendix
B,
Illustration
A.)
b)
Although Tier
1
allows
for
differentiation
between
residential and
industrial/commercial
property
use
of a
site,
an
institutional
control
under
Subpart
J
is
required
where
remediation
objectives
are
based
on
an
industrial/commercial
property
use.
ILUNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
c)
Any
given
exposure
route
is
not
a
concern
if the
concentration
of
each
contaminant
of
concern
detected
at
the
site
is
below
the
Tier
1
value
of
that
given
route.
In
such
a
case,
no further
evaluation
of
that
route
is
necessary.
(Source: Amended
at
Reg.
effective
Section
742.505
Tier
1
Soil
and
Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
a)
Soil
1)
Outdoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
A)
The
Tier
1
soil
remediation
objectives
for
this
exposure
route
based
upon
residential
property
use
are listed
in Appendix
B,
Table
A.
B)
The
Tier
1 soil
remediation
objectives
for
this
exposure
route
based
upon
industrial/commercial
property
use
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
B.
Soil
remediation
objective
determinations
relying
on
this table
require
use of
institutional
controls
in
accordance
with
Subpart
J.
2)
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
A)
The
Tier
1
soil
remediation
objectives
for
this
exposure
route
based
upon
residential
property
use
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
A.
B)
The
Tier
1
soil
remediation
objectives
for
this
exposure
route
based
upon
industrial/commercial
property
use
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
B.
Soil
remediation
objective
determinations
relying
on
this
table
require
use
of
institutional
controls
in
accordance
with
Subpart
J.
3)
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Route
A)
The
Tier
1 soil
remediation objectives
for
this
exposure
route
based
upon
residential
property
use
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
A.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
B)
The Tier
1
soil remediation
objectives
for
this
exposure
route
based
upon
industrial/commercial
property
use
are listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
B.
C)
The pH-dependent
Tier
1
soil remediation
objectives
for
identified
ionizable
organics
or
inorganics
for
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
(based
on
the
total
amount
of contaminants
present
in
the
soil
sample
results
and
groundwater
classification)
are
provided
in Appendix
B,
Tables
C
and
D.
D)
Values
used
to calculate
the
Tier
1
soil
remediation
objectives
for
this
exposure
route
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
F.
4)
Evaluation
of
the
dermal
contact
with
soil
exposure
route
is not
required
under
Tier
1.
For
the
soil component
of the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
the
requirements
of
Section
742.515
shall
be
followed.
b)
Groundwater
1)
The
Tier 1
groundwater
remediation
objectives
for the
groundwater
component
of
the groundwater
ingestion
route
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
E.
2)
The Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objectives
for this
exposure
route
are
given
for
Class
I
and
Class
II
groundwaters,
respectively.
3)
The
evaluation
of
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.615
regarding
mixtures
of
similar-acting
chemicals
shall
be
considered
satisfied
for Class
I
groundwater
at
the point
of
human
exposure if:
A)
No
more
than
one
similar-acting
noncarcinogenic
chemical
as
listed
in
Appendix
A,
Table
E is
detected
in
the groundwater
at the
site;
and
B)
No carcinogenic contaminant
of
concern
as
listed
in
Appendix
A,
Table
I is
detected
in
any
groundwater
sample
associated
with
the
site, using
analytical
procedures
capable
of
achieving
either
the
1
in
1,000,000
cancer
risk
concentration
or
the
ADL,
whichever
is
greater.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
4)
If the
conditions
of
subsection
(b)(3)
of this
Section
are
not met,
the
Class
I
groundwater
remediation
objectives
set
forth
in
Appendix
B,
Table
E
shall
be
corrected
for the
cumulative
effect
of
mixtures
of
similar-acting
chemicals
using the
following
methodologies:
A)
For
noncarcinogenic
chemicals,
the methodologies
set forth
at
Section
742.805(c)
or
Section
742.915(h)
shall
be used;
and
B)
For
carcinogenic
chemicals,
the methodologies
set forth
at
Section
742.805(d)
or
Section
742.9
15(h)
shall
be
used.
)
For
the groundwater
component
of the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
the
requirements
of Section
742.515
shall
be
followed.
(Source:
Amended
at
Reg.
effective
Section
742.5
10
Tier 1
Remediation
Objectives
Tables
a)
Soil
remediation
objectives
are listed
in
Appendix
B,
Tables
A, B,
C
and
D,
except
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
in
which
the requirements
of
Section
742.5
15 and
Appendix
B,
Table
G shall
be
followed.
1)
Appendix
B,
Table
A
is based
upon
residential
property
use.
A)
The
first
column
to the
right
of the
chemical
name
lists
soil
remediation
objectives
for the
soil
ingestion
exposure
route.
B)
The
second
column
lists
the
soil remediation
objectives
for
the
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
C)
The third
and
fourth
columns
list
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
for
the
respective
classes
of
groundwater:
i)
Class
I groundwater;
and
ii)
Class
II groundwater.
D)
The
final
colunm
lists
the Acceptable
Detection
Limit
(ADL),
only
where
applicable.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
2)
Appendix
B,
Table
B
is
based
upon
industrial/commercial
property
use.
A)
The
first
and
third columns
to the
right
of the
chemical
name
list
the
soil
remediation
objectives
for the
soil
ingestion
exposure
route
based
on two
receptor
populations:
i)
Industrial/commercial;
and
ii)
Construction
worker.
B)
The
second
and
fourth
columns
to
the right
of the
chemical
name
list
the
soil remediation
objectives
for
the outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
based
on two
receptor
populations:
i)
Industrial/commercial;
and
ii)
Construction
worker.
C)
The
fifth
and
sixth
columns
to the
right
of the
chemical
name
list
the
soil
remediation
objectives
for the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
for
two
classes
of
groundwater:
i)
Class
I groundwater;
and
ii)
Class
II
groundwater.
j
The
final column
lists the
acceptable
detection
limit
(ADL),
only
where
applicable.
3)
Appendix
B, Tables
C
and D
set
forth
pH
specific
soil remediation
objectives
for inorganic
and ionizing
organic
chemicals
for
the soil
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
route.
A)
Table
C
sets
forth
remediation
objectives
based
on Class
I
groundwater
and Table
D sets
forth
remediation
objectives
based
on Class
II groundwater.
B)
The
first
column
in
Tables
C
and
D lists
the
chemical
names.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
C)
The
second
through
ninth
columns
to
the
right
of the
chemical
names
list
the
pH
based
soil
remediation
objectives.
4)
For
the
inorganic
chemicals
listed in Appendix
B,
Tables
A
and
B,
the
soil
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
shall
be
evaluated
using
TCLP (SW-846
Method
1311)
or
SPLP
(SW-846
Method
1312),
incorporated
by
reference at
Section 742.2
10
unless
a
person
chooses
to
evaluate
the
soil
component
on
the
basis
of
the
total
amount
of
contaminant
in
a
soil
sample
result
in
accordance
with
subsection
(a)(5)
of
this
Section.
5)
For
those
inorganic
and
ionizing’ organic
chemicals
listed
in Appendix
B,
Tables
C
and
D,
if
a
person elects
to evaluate
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
based
on
the
total
amount
of
contaminant
in
a
soil
sample
result
(rather
than
TCLP
or
SPLP
analysis),
the
person
shall
determine
the
soil
pH
at
the
site
and
then
select
the
appropriate
soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
Class
I
and
Class
II
groundwaters
from
Tables
C
and
D,
respectively.
If
the
soil
pH
is
less
than
4.5
or
greater
than
9.0,
then
Tables
C
and
D
cannot
be
used.
6)
Unless one
or
more
exposure
routes
are
excluded
from
consideration
under
Subpart
C,
the
most
stringent
soil
remediation
objective
of
the
exposure
routes
(i.e.,
soil
ingestion
exposure
route,
outdoor and
indoor
inhalation
exposure
routes,
and
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route)
shall
be
compared
to
the
concentrations
of
soil
contaminants
of
concern
measured
at
the
site.
When
using
Appendix
B,
Table
B
to
select
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
ingestion
exposure
route
and
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
routes,
the
remediation
objective
shall
be
the
more
stringent
soil
remediation
objective
of
the
industrial/commercial
populations
and
construction
worker
populations.
7)
Confirmation
sample
results
may
be
averaged
or
soil
samples
may
be
composited
in
accordance
with
Section
742.225.
8)
If
a
soil
remediation
objective
for
a chemical
is
less
than
the
ADL,
the
ADL
shall
serve
as
the
soil
remediation
objective.
b)
Groundwater
remediation
objectives
for
the
groundwater
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
are
listed
in
Appendix
B, Table
E.
However,
Appendix
B,
Table
E must
be
corrected
for
cumulative
effect
of
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
mixtures
of
similar-acting
noncarcinogenic
chemicals
as set
forth
in
Section
742.505(b)(3).
1)
The first
colunm
to the
right
of the chemical
name
lists
groundwater
remediation
objectives
for Class
I
groundwater,
and
the
second
colunm
lists the
groundwater
remediation
objectives
for Class
II
groundwater.
2)
To use
Appendix
B, Table
E
of this
Part, the
35 Iii.
Adm.
Code
620
classification
for
groundwater
at the site
shall
be determined.
The
concentrations
of
groundwater
contaminants
of
concern
at
the site
are
compared
to
the applicable
Tier
1 groundwater
remediation
objectives
for
the
groundwater
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
in
Appendix
B, Table
E.
c)
For
contaminants
of
concern
not
listed
in Appendix
B,
Tables
A, B
and
E,
a
person
may
request
site-specific
remediation
objectives
from
the
Agency
or
propose
site-specific
remediation
objectives
in
accordance
with
35 Ill. Adm.
Code
620,
Subpart
I
of
this Part,
or
both.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.5
15
Tier
1
Remediation
Objectives
Table
for
the Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
Soil
remediation
objectives
for the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
are listed
in
ppendix
B,
Table
G.
1)
The
first
column
to
the right
of
the
chemical
name
lists
the
soil
remediation
objectives
for residential
receptors.
2)
The second
column
lists the
soil remediation
objectives
for
industriallcommercial
receptors.
3)
The third
column
lists
the
Acceptable
Detection
Limit (ADL),
only
where
applicable.
If the
soil remediation
objective
for
a volatile
chemical
is
less
than
the
ADL,
the
ADL
shall serve
as
the
soil
remediation
objective.
j
Groundwater
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
are
listed
in
Appendix
B.
Table
G.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
1)
The
fourth
column
to
the
right
of
the chemical
name
lists
the
groundwater
remediation
objective
for
residential
receptors.
2)
The
fifth column
to
the
right
of
the
chemical
name
lists
the
groundwater
remediation
objective
for
industrial/commercial
receptors.
Soil
gas
remediation objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
are
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
G.
1)
The
sixth
colunm
to the
right
of
the
chemical
names
lists
the
soil
gas
remediation objectives
for residential
receptors.
2)
The
seventh
column
to
the
right
of the
chemical
name
lists
the
soil
gas
remediation
objectives
for
industriallcommercial
receptors.
Unless
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
is
excluded
from
consideration
under
Subpart
C,
Tier
1
remediation
objectives
for the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
be
used
for:
1)
soil
and
groundwater,
or
2)
soil
gas.
ci
If using
soil
and
groundwater
remediation
objectives
to
demonstrate
compliance,
then
in accordance
with
Section
742.51
O(a)(6), the
most
stringent
soil
remediation
objective
and
the
most
stringent
groundwater
remediation
objective
of
the
exposure
routes
from
Appendix
B,
Tables
A, B,
E,
and
G
shall
be
applied
to
the
site,
unless
one
or
more
exposure
routes
are
excluded
under
Subpart
C.
Where
a
route(s)
is
excluded,
use
the most
stringent
remediation
objective
of
the
routes
remaining.
fl
For
volatile
chemicals
not
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
G. a
person
may
request
site-specific
remediation
objectives
from
the
Agency
or
propose
site-specific
remediation
objectives
in
accordance
with
Subpart
I
of
this
Part,
or
both.
(Source:
Added at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART F:
TIER
2
GENERAL
EVALUATION
Section
742.600
Tier
2 Evaluation
Overview
a)
Tier
2
remediation objectives
are
developed
through
the
use
of equations
which
allow
site-specific
data
to
be
used.
(See
Appendix
C, Illustrations
A
and
B.)
The
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
equations, identified
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
A,
a4
C, and
L
may
be
used
to
develop
Tier
2
remediation
objectives.
b)
Tier
2 evaluation
is only
required
for
contaminants
of concern and
corresponding
exposure
routes
(except
where
excluded
from
further
consideration
under
Subpart
C)
exceeding
the
Tier
1
remediation
objectires.
When
conducting
Tier
2
evaluations,
the
values
used
in
the
calculations
must
have
the
appropriate
units
of
measure
as
identified
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B, a4
D,
and
M.
c)
Any
development
of remediation
objectives
using
site-specific
information
or
equations
outside
the
Tier
2
framework
shall
be
evaluated
under
Tier
3.
d)
Any
development
of
a remediation
objective
under
Tier
2
shall
not
use
a
target
hazard
quotient
greater
than
one
at the
point
of human exposure
or
a target
cancer
risk
greater
than
1
in
1,000,000
at the
point
of
human
exposure.
e)
In conducting
a Tier
2
evaluation,
the
following
conditions
shall
be
met:
1)
For
each
discrete
sample,
the
total
soil
contaminant
concentration
of
either
a
single
contaminant
or
multiple
contaminants
of
concern
shall
not
exceed
the
attenuation
capacity
of
the
soil
as
provided
in Section 742.215.
2)
Remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
compounds which
affect
the
same
target
organ,
organ
system
or
similar
mode
of
action
shall
meet
the
requirements
of Section
742.720.
3)
The
soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
the
outdoor and
indoor
inhalation
exposure
routes
and
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
routes
shall
not
exceed
the
soil
saturation
limit
as
provided
in
Section
742.220.
4
The
soil
gas
remediation
objectives
based
on
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
not
exceed
the
soil
vapor
saturation
limit
as
provided
in
Section
742.222.
Tier
2 remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
be
calculated, as
appropriate,
for
1)
soil
and
groundwater,
or
2)
soil
gas.
g
If the
calculated
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objective
for
an applicable
exposure
route
is more
stringent
than
the corresponding
Tier
1 remediation
objective, then
the
Tier
1
remediation
objective
applies.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENIMENTS
g)
If the
calculated
Tier
2 soil
remediation
objective
for
an
exposure
route
is
more
stringent
than
the Tier
1
soil remediation
objective(s)
for
the
other
exposure
routes,
then
the
Tier
2
calculated
soil remediation
objective
applies
and
Tier
2 soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
other
exposure
routes
are
not
required.
j)
If
the calculated
Tier
2 soil
remediation
objective
is
less
stringent
than
one
or
more
of
the
soil
remediation
objectives
for the
remaining
exposure
routes,
then
the
Tier
2 values
are
calculated
for
the
remaining
exposure
route(s)
and
the
most
stringent
Tier
2
calculated value
applies.
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.605
Land
Use
a)
Present
and
post-remediation
land
use
is
evaluated
in a
Tier
2 evaluation.
Acceptable
exposure
factors
for
the
Tier
2 evaluation
for
residential,
industrial/commercial,
and
construction
worker
populations
are
provided
in
the
far right
column
of
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
a4
D
1 and
M.
Use
of
exposure
factors
different
from
those
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B,
n4
D, and
M must
be
approved
by
the
Agency
as
part of
a Tier
3
evaluation.
b)
If
a Tier
2 evaluation
is
based
on an
industrial/commercial
property
use,
then:
1)
Construction worker
populations
shall
also
be evaluated;
and
2)
Institutional controls
are required
in accordance
with
Subpart
J.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.6
10
Chemical
and Site
Properties
a)
Physical
and
Chemical Properties
of
Contaminants
Tier 2
evaluations
require information
on
the physical
and
chemical
properties
of
the contaminants
of
concern.
The
physical
and
chemical
properties
used
in
a Tier
2
evaluation
are
contained
in Appendix
C,
Table
E.
If
the site
has
contaminants
not
included
in this
table,
a person
may
request
the
Agency
to provide
the
applicable
physical
and
chemical
input
values
or
may propose
input
values
under
Subpart
I. If
a person
proposes
to
apply
values
other
than
those
in Appendix
C,
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Table
E, or
those
provided
by
the
Agency,
the
evaluation
shall
be
considered
under
Tier
3.
b)
Soil
and
Groundwater
Parameters
1)
A
Tier
2
evaluation
requires
examination
of soil
and
groundwater
parameters.
The
parameters
that
may
be
varied,
and
the
conditions
under
which
these
parameters
are
determined
as
part
of Tier
2,
are
summarized
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1
and
D
1
and
M.
If
a person
proposes
to vary
site-
specific
parameters outside
of
the framework
of
these
tables,
the
evaluation
shall
be
considered
under
Tier
3.
2)
To determine
site-specific
physical
soil
parameters,
a minimum
of
one
boring
per
0.5
acre
of
contamination
shall
be
collected.
This
boring
must
be
deep
enough
to
allow
the
collection
of the
required
field
measurements.
The
site-specific
physical
soil
parameters
must
be
determined
from
the
portion
of
the
boring representing
the
stratigraphic
unit(s)
being
evaluated.
For
example,
if
evaluating
the
soil
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route,
two
samples
from
the
boring
will
be
required:
A)
A
sample
of
the
predominant
soil
type
for
the
vadose
zone;
and
B)
A sample
of
the
predominant
soil
type
for
the
saturated
zone.
3)
A
site-specific
SSL
dilution
factor
(used
in
developing
soil
remediation
objectives based
upon
the
protection
of groundwater)
may
be
determined
by
substituting
site
information
in
Equation
S22
in
Appendix
C,
Table
A.
To
make
this
demonstration,
a
minimum
of
three
monitoring
wells
shall
be
used
to
determine
the
hydraulic
gradient.
As
an alternative,
the
default
dilution
factor
value
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
B may
be
used.
If
monitoring
wells
are
used
to
determine
the
hydraulic
gradient,
the
soil
taken
from
the
borings
shall
be
visually
inspected
to
ensure
there
are
no
significant
differences in
the
stratigraphy.
If there
are
similar
soil
types
in
the field,
one
boring
shall
be
used
to
determine
the
site-specific
physical
soil
parameters.
If
there
are
significant
differences,
all
of
the
borings
shall
be
evaluated
before
determining
the
site-specific
physical
soil
parameters
for
the
site.
4)
Not
all
of
the
parameters
identified
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1
and
D1
and
Mneed
to be
determined
on a
site-specific
basis.
A
person
may
choose
to
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
collect
partial
site-specific
information
and
use
default
values
as
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
and D
and
M for
the
rest
of the
parameters.
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
G:
TIER
2
SOIL
EVALUATION
Section
742.700
Tier 2
Soil
Evaluation
Overview
a)
Tier
2 remediation
objectives
are
developed
through the
use of
models
which
allow
site-specific
data
to
be considered.
Appendix
C,
Tables
A
and
C,
and
L
list
equations
that shall
be
used
under
a
Tier
2
evaluation
to calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
prescribed
by
SSL
and RBCA,
and
the modified
J&E
models,
respectively.
(See
also
Appendix
C,
Illustration
A.)
b)
Appendix
C,
Table
A lists
equations
that
are used
under
the
SSL
model.
(See
also
Appendix
C,
Illustration
A.)
The
SSL
model
has
equations
to
evaluate
the
following
human
exposure
routes:
1)
Soil
ingestion
exposure
route;
2)
Outdoor
Inhalation
exposure
route
for:
A)
Organic
contaminants;
B)
Fugitive
dust;
and
3)
Soil
component
of
the groundwater
ingestiOn
exposure
route.
c)
Evaluation
of
the
dermal
exposure
route
is
not
required
under
the SSL
model.
d)
Appendix
C,
Table
C
lists
equations
that
are
used
under
the
RBCA
model.
(See
also
Appendix
C,
Illustration
A.)
The
RBCA
model
has
equations
to
evaluate
human
exposure
based
on
the
following:
1)
The
combined
exposure
routes
of outdoor
inhalation
of
vapors
and
particulates,
soil ingestion
and
dermal
contact
with
soil;
2)
The
ambient
vapor
inhalation
(outdoor)
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
from
subsurface
soils;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Appendix
C,
Table
L
lists
equations
that
are
used
under
the
modified
J&E
model.
The
modified
J&E
model
has
equations
to evaluate
human
exposure
by
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
The
modified
model
allows
for the
development
of
soil
remediation
objectives
and soil
gas
remediation
objectives.
e)
The
equations
in
either
Appendix
C,
Table
1
A 8f
C,
or L
may
be
used
to
calculate
remediation
objectives
for
each contaminant
of concern
under
Tier
2, if
the
following
requirements
are met:
1)
The
Tier 2
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the ingestion
and
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
routes
shall
use the
applicable
equations
from
the
same
approach
(i.e.,
SSL equations
in
Appendix
C,
Table
C).
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
only
the J&E
equations
can
be
used.
2)
The
equations
used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the soil
component
of the
groundwater ingestion
exposure
route
are
not
dependent
on the
approach utilized
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
other
exposure
routes.
For
example,
it is acceptable
to
use
the
SSL
equations
for calculating
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
ingestion
and
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
routes,
and
the
RBCA
equations
for
calculating
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route.
3)
Combining
equations
from
Appendix
C,
Tables
A,
awl
C,
and
L
to
form
a
new
model
is
not
allowed.
In
addition,
Appendix
C,
Tables
A,
and
C,
and
L
must
use
their
own
applicable
parameters
identified
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1 awl
D
1
and M,
respectively.
g
#
In calculating
soil remediation objectives
for
industrial/commercial
property
use,
applicable calculations
shall
be
performed
twice:
once
using
industrial/commercial
population default
values
and
once
using
construction
worker
population
default
values.
The
more
stringent
soil
remediation
objectives
derived
from
these
calculations
must
be
used
for
further
Tier
2
evaluations.
The
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
does
not apply
to the
construction
worker
population.
g
Tier
2 data
sheets
provided
by
the
Agency
shall
be
used
to present
calculated
Tier
2
remediation
objectives,
if
required
by
the
particular
program
for
which
remediation
is being
performed.
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AME1DMENTS
j
h
The
RBCA
equations
which
rely
on
the
parameter
Soil
Water
Sorption
Coefficient
(ks)
can
only
be
used
for
ionizing
organics
and
inorganics
by
substituting
values
for
k
from
Appendix
C,
Tables
I
and
J,
respectively.
This
will
also
require
the
determination
of a
site-specific
value
for
soil
pH.
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.705
Parameters
for
Soil
Remediation
Objective
Equations
a)
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1
aii4
D
1
and
M
list
the
input
parameters
for
the
SSL
1
aftd
RBCA
1
and
J&E
equations,
respectively.
The
first
column
lists
each
symbol
as
it
is
presented
in
the
equation.
The
next column
defines
the
parameters.
The
third
column
shows
the
units
for
the
parameters.
The
fourth
column
identifies
where
infonnation
on
the
parameters
can
be obtained
(i.e.,
field
measurement,
applicable
equation(s),
reference
source,
or default
value). The
last
column
identifies
how
the
parameters
can be
generated.
b)
Default Values
Default
values
are
numerical
values
specified
for
use
in
the
Tier
2
equations.
The
fourth
column
of
Appendix
C,
Tables
and
1
and
M
denotes
if
the
default
values
are
from
the
SSL
model,
RBCA model,
the
modified
J&E
model
or
some
other
source.
The
last
column
of Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1
and
D,
and
M
lists
the
numerical
values
for
the
default
values
used
in
the
SSL
1
and
RBCA,
and
J&E
equations, respectively.
c)
Site-specific
Information
Site-specific
information
is a
parameter
measured,
obtained,
or
determined
from
the
site
to
calculate
Tier
2
remediation
objectives.
The
fourth
column
of
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1 and
D,
and
M
identifies those
site-specific
parameters
that
may
require
direct
field
measurement.
For
some
parameters,
numerical
default
inputs
have
been
provided
in
the
last
column
of
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
1
and
D1
and
M
to
substitute for
site-specific
information.
In some
cases,
information
on
the
receptor
or
soil
type
is required
to
select
the
applicable
numerical
default
inputs.
Site-specific
information
includes:
1)
Physical
soil
parameters identified
in
Appendix
C,
Table
F.
The
second
column
identifies
the
location
where
the
sample
is to
be
collected.
Acceptable
methods
for
measuring
or
calculating
these
soil
parameters
are
identified
in
the
last
column
of
Appendix
C,
Table
F;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE OF
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
2)
Institutional
controls
or engineered
barriers, pursuant
to
Subparts
J and
K,
describe
applicable
institutional
controls
and
engineered
barriers
under
a
Tier
2 evaluation;
and
3)
Land
use
classification
d)
Toxicological-specific
Information
1)
Toxicological-specific
information
is
used
to
calculate
Tier
2
remediation
objectives
for
the
following
parameters,
if applicable:
A)
Oral
Chronic
Reference
Dose
(RiD
0
,
expressed
in mg/kg-d);
B)
Oral
Subchronic
Reference
Dose
(RfD,
expressed
in
mg/kg-d,
shall
be
used
for
construction
worker
remediation
objective
calculations);
C)
Oral
Slope
Factor
(SF
0
,
expressed
in
(mg/kg-d)’);
D)
Inhalation
Unit
Risk
Factor
(TJRF
expressed
in (ig/m
3
)’);
E)
Inhalation
Chronic
Reference
Concentration
(RfC,
expressed
in
mg/rn
3
);
F)
Inhalation
Subchronic Reference
Concentration
(RfC,
expressed
in
mg/rn
3
,
shall
be
used
for
construction
worker
remediation
objective
calculations);
G)
Inhalation Chronic
Reference
Dose
(RlD,
expressed
in
mg/kg-d);
H)
Inhalation
Subchronic Reference
Dose
(RlD,
expressed
in
mg/kg
d,
shall
be
used
for
construction
worker
remediation
objective
calculations);
and
I)
Inhalation
Slope
Factor
(SF
1
,
expressed
in (mg/kg-d)’);
2)
Toxicological
information
can
be
obtained
from
S
by
following
the
guidelines
in OSWER Directive
9285.7-53,
as
incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.2
10,
or
the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
e)
Chemical-specific
Information
Chemical-specific
information
used to
calculate
Tier
2 remediation
objectives
is
listed
in Appendix
C,
Table
E.
f)
Calculations
Calculating
numerical
values
for
some
parameters
requires
the
use of
equations
listed
in Appendix
C, Table
A
er
C
and
L.
The
parameters
that
are
calculated
are
listed in
Appendix
C,
Tables
B
and
D,
and M.
(Source:
Amended
at
Reg.
effective
Section
742.7 10
SSL Soil
Equations
a)
This
Section
sets
forth
the
equations
and
parameters
used
to
develop
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objectives
for the
three
exposure
routes
using
the
SSL
approach.
b)
Soil
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
1)
Equations
S
1 through
S3 form
the basis
for
calculating
Tier 2
remediation
objectives
for the
soil ingestion
exposure
route using
the
SSL
approach.
Equation
Si
is used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
contaminants.
Equations
S2
and
S3
are used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
contaminants
for
residential
populations
and
industrial/commercial
and
construction
worker
populations, respectively.
2)
For
Equations
Si through
S3,
the
SSL default
values
cannot
be
modified
with
site-specific
information.
c)
Outdoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
1)
Equations
S4
through
S16,
S26
and
S27 are
used to
calculate
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objectives
for the
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
using
the
SSL
approach.
To
address
this
exposure
route,
organic
contaminants
and
mercury
must be
evaluated
separately
from
fugitive
dust
using
their
own
equations
set
forth
in subsections
(c)(2) and
(c)(3)
of this
Section,
respectively.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
2)
Organic
Contaminants
A)
Equations
S4
through Si
0
are
used
to calculate
Tier 2
soil
remediation
objectives
for organic
contaminants
and
mercury
based
on the outdoor
inhalation
exposure route.
Equation
S4 is
used
to calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
organic
contaminants
in
soil
for
residential
and
industrial/commercial
populations.
Equation
S5 is
used to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for noncarcinogenic
organic
contaminants
and
mercury
in
soil
for
construction
worker
populations.
Equation
S6
is used
to
calculate soil
remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
organic contaminants
in soil
for
residential
and industriallcommercial
populations.
Equation
S7 is
used to calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
organic
contaminants
in
soil for construction
worker
populations.
Equations
S8 through
Sb,
S27
and
S28
are used
for
calculating
numerical
values
for
some
of the parameters
in
Equations
S4
through
S7.
B)
For Equation
S4, a numerical
value
for the
Volatilization
Factor
(VP)
can
be
calculated
in accordance
with
subsection
(c)(2)(F)
of
this
Section.
The
remaining
parameters
in Equation
S4
have
either
SSL
default
values listed
in Appendix
C,
Table
B
or
toxicological-
specific
information
(i.e.,
RfC),
which
can
be obtained
from
IRIS
or requested
from the
program
under which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
C)
For
Equation
S5,
a numerical
value for the
Volatilization
Factor
adjusted
for
Agitation
(VF’) can
be
calculated
in
accordance
with
subsection
(c)(2)(G)
of
this
Section.
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
S5
have either
SSL default
values
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
B or toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
RfC),
which
can be obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is being
performed.
D)
For Equation
S6,
a
numerical
value
for VF can
be
calculated
in
accordance
with
subsection
(c)(2)(F)
of this Section.
The
remaining
parameters
in Equation
S6 have
either
default
values
listed
in Appendix
C, Table
B or toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
URF), which
can be
obtained
from IRIS
or
requested
from
the
program
under which
the
remediation
is being
performed.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
B)
For
Equation
S7,
a
numerical
value
for
VF’
can
be
calculated
in
accordance
with
subsection
(c)(2)(G)
of
this
Section.
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
S7 have
either
default
values
listed
in Appendix
C,
Table
B
or
toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
URF),
which
can
be obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from
the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
F)
The
VF
can
be
calculated
for
residential
and
industrial/commercial
populations
using
one
of
the
following
equations
based
on
the
information
known
about
the
contaminant
source
and
receptor
population:
i)
Equation
S8,
in
conjunction
with
Equation
SlO,
is
used
to
calculate
VF
assuming
an
infinite
source
of
contamination;
or
ii)
If the
area
and
depth
of
the
contaminant
source
are
known
or can
be
estimated
reliably,
mass
limit
considerations
may
be
used
to
calculate
VF
using
Equation
S26.
G)
The
VF’
can
be
calculated
for
the
construction
worker
populations
using
one
of the
following
equations
based
on
the
information
known
about
the
contaminant
source:
i)
Equation
S9 is
used
to
calculate
VF’
assuming
an infinite
source
of contamination;
or
ii)
If
the
area
and
depth
of
the
contaminant
source
are
known
or
can
be
estimated
reliably,
mass
limit
considerations
may
be
used
to
calculate
VF’
using
Equation
S27.
3)
Fugitive
Dust
A)
Equations
S
11
through
S16
are
used
to calculate
Tier
2 soil
remediation
objectives using
the
SSL
fugitive
dust
model
for
the
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
Equation
Sil
is
used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
contaminants
in fugitive
dust
for
residential
and
industrial/commercial
populations.
Equation S12
is
used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
contaminants
in fugitive
dust
for
construction
worker
populations.
Equation
S
13 is used
to calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
contaminants
in
fugitive
dust for
residential
and
industrial/commercial
populations.
Equation
S14 is
used
to
calculate
soil remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
contaminants
in fugitive
dust
for
construction
worker
populations.
Equations
Si
5
and
Si
6 are
used for
calculating
numerical
quantities
for
some
of the
parameters
in
Equations
Sil through
Si4.
B)
For
Equation
Sli,
a numerical
value
can
be calculated
for
the
Particulate
Emission
Factor
(PEF)
using
Equation
S15.
This
equation
relies
on
various
input parameters
from
a variety
of
sources.
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
S11
have
either
SSL
default
values
listed
in Appendix
C,
Table
B
or
toxicological-
specific
information
(i.e.,
RfC),
which
can
be
obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from
the program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
C)
For
Equation
Si2,
a
numerical
value
for
the
Particulate
Emission
Factor
for
Construction
Worker
(PEF’)
can be
calculated
using
Equation
S16.
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
Si2
have
either
SSL
default
values
listed
in
Appendix
C, Table
B
or
toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
RfC),
which
can
be
obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from
the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being performed.
D)
For
Equation
S13,
a numerical
value
for PEF
can
be calculated
using
Equation
S15.
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
Si3
have
either
default
values
listed
in Appendix
C,
Table B
or
toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
URF),
which
can
be
obtained
from
IRIS or
requested
from
the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
E)
For
Equation
S14, a
numerical
value
for PEF’
can
be
calculated
using
Equation
Si6.
The
remaining
parameters
in Equation
Si4
have either
default
values
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
B
or
toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
URF),
which
can
be
obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
d)
Soil
Component
of
the Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
The
Tier
2 remediation
objective for
the
soil
component
of
the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
can
be
calculated
using
one
of
the
following
equations
based
on
the
information
known
about
the
contaminant
source
and
receptor
population:
1)
Equation
S17
is
used
to
calculate
the
remediation
objective
assuming
an
infinite
source
of
contamination.
A)
The
numerical
quantities
for
four
parameters
in
Equation
S17,
the
Target
Soil
Leachate
Concentration
(C),
Soil-Water
Partition
Coefficient
(K)
for
non-ionizing
organics,
Water-Filled
Soil
Porosity Theta
w
(9w)
and
Air-Filled
Soil
Porosity
Theta
a
(Oa),
are
calculated
using
Equations
S18,
S19,
S20
and
S21,
respectively.
Equations
S22,
S23,
S24
and
S25
are
also
needed
to
calculate
numerical
values
for
Equations
S18
and
S21.
The
pH-
dependent
Kd
values
for
ionizing
organics
can
be
calculated
using
Equation
Sl9
and
the
pH-dependent
Koc
values
in
Appendix
C,
Table
I.
B)
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
Si
7
are
Henry’s
Law
Constant
(H’),
a chemical
specific
value
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
E
and
Dry
Soil
Bulk
Density
(Pb),
a
site-specific
based
value
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
B.
C)
The
default value
for
GW
0b
is
the
Tier
1
groundwater
objective.
For
chemicals
for
which
there
is
no
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objective,
the
value
for
GW
0b
shall
be
the
concentration
determined
according
to
the
proccdures
specified
in
35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
620,
Subpart
F.
As
an
alternative
to
using
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objectives
or
concentrations
determined
according
to
the
procedures
specified
in
35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
620,
Subpart
F.
GW
0b
may
be developed
using
Equations
R25
and
R26,
if approved
institutional
controls
are
in place
as
required
in
Subpart
J.
2)
If
the
area
and
depth
of
the
contaminant
source
are
known
or
can
be
estimated
reliably,
mass
limit
considerations
may
be
used
to
calculate
the
remediation
objective
for
this
exposure
route
using
Equation S28.
The
parameters
in
Equation
S28
have
default
values
listed
in Appendix
C,
Table
B.
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENIMENTS
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.715
RBCA
Soil
Equations
a)
This
Section
presents
the
RBCA
model and
describes
the
equations
and
parameters
used
to
develop
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objectives.
b)
Ingestion,
Outdoor Inhalation,
and
Dermal
Contact
1)
The
two
sets
of
equations
in
subsections
(b)(2)
and
(b)(3)
of
this
Section
shall
be
used
to
generate
Tier
2 soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
combined
ingestion,
outdoor
inhalation,
and
dermal
contact
with
soil
exposure
routes.
2)
Combined Exposure
Routes
of Soil
Ingestion,
Outdoor
Inhalation
of
Vapors
and
Particulates,
and
Dermal
Contact
with
Soil
A)
Equations
Ri
and
R2
form
the
basis
for deriving
Tier
2
remediation
objectives
for the
set
of
equations that
evaluates
the
combined
exposure
routes
of soil
ingestion,
outdoor
inhalation
of
vapors
and
particulates,
and
dermal
contact
with
soil
using
the
RBCA
approach.
Equation
Ri
is used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
contaminants.
Equation
R2
is
used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
contaminants.
Soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
ambient
vapor
inhalation
(outdoor)
outdoor inhalation
exposure
route
from
subsurface
soils
must
also
be
calculated
in accordance
with
the
procedures
outlined
in
subsection
(b)(3)
of
this
Section
and
compared
to the
values
generated
from
Equations
Ri
or R2.
The
smaller
value
(i.e.,
Ri
and
R2
compared
to R7
and
R8,
respectively)
from
these
calculations
is the
Tier
2
soil
remediation
objective
for
the
combined
exposure
routes
of
soil
ingestion,
outdoor
inhalation,
and
dermal
contact
with
soil.
B)
In
Equation
Ri,
numerical
values
are
calculated
for
two
parameters:
i)
The
volatilization
factor
for
surficial
soils
(VF)
using
Equations
R3
and
R4;
and
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
ii)
The
volatilization
factor
for
subsurface
soils
regarding
particulates
(VF)
using
Equation
R5.
C)
VF
8
uses
Equations
R3
and R4
to
derive
a
numerical
value.
Equation
R3
requires
the
use
of
Equation
R6.
Both
equations
must
be
used
to
calculate
the
The
lowest
calculated
value
from
these
equations
must
be
substituted
into
Equation
Ri.
D)
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation
Ri
have
either
default
values
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
D
or
toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
SF
0
,
SF
1
),
which
can
be
obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from
the program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
B)
For
Equation
R2,
the
parameters
VF
and
VF
are
calculated.
The
remaining
parameters
in
Equation R2
have
either
default
values
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
D
or
toxicological-specific
information
(i.e.,
RfDO,
RiD
1
),
which
can
be
obtained
from
IRIS
or
requested
from
the
program
under
which
the
remediation
is
being
performed.
F)
For
chemicals
other
than
inorganics
which
do
not
have
default
values
for
the
dermal
absorption
factor
(RAFd)
in Appendix
C,
Table
D,
a
dermal
absorption
factor
of
0.5
shall
be
used
for
Equations
Ri
and
R2.
For
inorganics,
dermal absorption
may
be
disregarded
(i.e.,
RAFd
=
0).
3)
Ambient
Vapor
Inhalation
(outdoor)
Outdoor
Inhalation
exposure
route
from
Subsurface
Soils
(soil
below
one
meter)
A)
Equations
R7
and
R8
form
the basis
for
deriving
Tier
2
remediation
objectives
for
the
ambient
vapor
inhalation
(outdoor)
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route
from
subsurface
soils
using
the
RBCA
approach.
Equation
R7
is used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
carcinogenic
contaminants.
Equation
R8
is used
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
for
noncarcinogenic
contaminants.
B)
For
Equation
R7,
the
carcinogenic
risk-based
screening
level
for
air
(RBSLair)
and
the
volatilization
factor
for
soils
below
one
meter
to
ambient
air
(VFsamb)
have
numerical
values
that
are
calculated
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
using
Equations
R9
and
Ri
1, respectively.
Both
equations
rely
on
input
parameters
from
a variety
of
sources.
C)
The
noncarcinogenic
risk-based
screening
level
for
air
(RBSLair)
and
the
volatilization
factor
for
soils
below
one
meter
to
ambient
air
(VFsamb)
in Equation
R8
have
numerical
values
that
can
be
calculated
using
Equations
RiO
and
Ri 1,
respectively.
c)
Soil
Component
of
the Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
1)
Equation
R12
forms
the
basis
for deriving
Tier
2 remediation
objectives
for
the soil
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route
using
the
RBCA
approach.
The
parameters,
groundwater
at
the
source
(GWsource)
and
Leaching
Factor
(LF),
have
numerical
values
that
are
calculated
using
Equations
Ri
3
and
R14,
respectively.
2)
Equation
Ri
3
requires
numerical
values
that
are
calculated
using
Equation
R15.
3)
Equation
R14
requires
numerical
values
that
are
calculated
using
Equations
R21,
R22,
and
R24.
For
non-ionizing
organics,
the
Soil
Water
Sorption
Coefficient
k
shall
be
calculated
using
Equation
R20.
For
ionizing
organics and
inorganics,
the
values
for
(ks)
are listed
in
Appendix
C,
Tables
I and
J,
respectively.
The pH-dependent
k
values
for
ionizing
organics
can
be
calculated
using
Equation
R20
and the
pH-dependent
values
in Appendix
C,
Table
I.
The remaining
parameters
in
Equation
Ri4
are
field
measurements
or
default
values
listed
in
Appendix
C,
Table
D.
d)
The
default
value
for
GWcomp
is the
Tier
1 groundwater
remediation
objective.
For
chemicals for which
there
is no
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objective,
the
value
for
GWcomp
shall
be
the
concentration
determined
according
to the
procedures
specified
in
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
620,
Subpart
F.
As an
alternative
to
using
the
above
concentrations,
GWcomp
may
be
developed
using
Equations
R25
and
R26,
if
approved
institutional
controls
are
in
place
as
may be
required
in
SubpartJ.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
Section
742.7
17
Indoor
Inhalation
Equations
for
Soil
and
Soil
Gas
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
This
Section
sets
forth
the
equations
and
parameters
to
be
used
to
develop
Tier
2
soil
and
soil
gas
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
using
the modified
J&E
model.
Equations
J&E1
and
J&E2
calculate,
for
carcinogens
and
noncarcinogens
respectively,
an
acceptable
concentration
of
the
contaminant
of concern
in
indoor
air
that
adequately
protects
humans
who
inhale
this
air.
Equation
J&E3
converts
indoor air concentrations
from
parts
per
million
volume
to
milligrams
per
cubic
meter.
Equation
J&E4
calculates
an
acceptable
concentration
of
the
contaminant
of
concern in
the
soil
gas
at the
source
of
contamination.
This
calculation
is
made
using:
(1)
an attenuation
factor
developed
in
accordance
with
Equations
J&E8b
through
18;
and
(2)
the acceptable
concentration
of
the
contaminant
of concern
in
indoor
air
calculated
in
accordance
with
Equation
J&E1
(for
carcinogens)
or
J&E2
(for
noncarcinogens).
4
The
attenuation
factor
(Equation J&E8b)
accounts
for
the
following
processes:
fl
Migration
of
contaminants
from
the
source
upwards
through
the
vadose
zone;
)
Migration of
contaminants
through
the
earthen
filled
cracks
in
the
slab-on-
grade
or
basement
floor
and
walls;
and
Mixing
of
the
contaminants
with
air
inside
the
building.
Equation
J&E8b
is
used
where
diffusion
is the
dominant
transport
mechanism.
In
this
scenario,
the
Q-i
value
equals
zero.
Equations
J&E9a
through
J&E18
calculate
input
parameters
for
Equation
J&E8b
(the
equation
used
to calculate
an attenuation
factor).
These
equations
assume
there
are
“n”
different
soil
layers
between
the source
of
the
contamination
and
the
floor
of
the
building.
Equations
J&E11, 16,
17
and
18
shall
be used
to
calculate
the
needed
parameters
for
each
of
the
n
layers
(the
general
soil
layer
is
referred
to
as
soil
layer
“i”
and
i
=
1,2,
.
.
.n).
Equations
J&E16,
17,
and
18
shall
also
be
used
to
calculate
needed
parameters
for
the
soil
in
the cracks
of
the
floor
of
the
building
(it
is
through
these
cracks
that
contaminants
flow
from
the
subsurface
and
into
the
building).
ILlINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
g
The default
representative
subsurface
temperature
for
Henry’s
Law
Constant
is
13°C.
This
value
shall
be used,
as
appropriate,
in
all calculations
needed
to
represent
the system
by
which
contaminants
migrate
through
the
subsurface.
Equation
J&E5
calculates
an
acceptable
soil
remediation
objective
using:
(1)
the
soil
gas remediation
objective
calculated
in
accordance
with
Equation
J&E4
and
(2)
the
assumption
that
this gas
is in
equilibrium
with
the
contaminated
soil
at
the
source.
The
calculated
soil
remediation
objective
shall
be
compared
with
the
saturated
soil
concentration
(Cm,
Equation
J&E6a)
for
each
chemical
with
a melting
point
less
than
3 0°C.
The calculated
C
shall
use the
default
representative
subsurface
temperature
specified
in
742.717
(g).
If the
calculated
soil
remediation
objective
is
greater
than
C,
then
Cis
used
as
the
soil
remediation
objective.
fl
The
calculated
soil
gas
remediation
objective
shall
be
compared
with
the
saturated
vapor
concentration
(CSat,
Equation
J&E6b)
for
each
volatile
chemical.
The
calculated
Csat
shall
use the
default
representative
subsurface
temperature
specified
in
742.717(g).
If
the calculated
soil gas
remediation
objective
is
greater
than
CSat,
then
Csat
is
used
as
the
soil
gas remediation
objective.
Ic)
The
calculated
soil
gas
remediation
objective
shall
be
compared
to
concentrations
of
soil
gas
collected
at a
depth
at
least
3
feet
below
ground
surface
and
above
the
saturated
zone. If
a valid
sample
cannot
be collected,
a
soil
gas
sampling
plan
shall
be approved
by
the
Agency
under
Tier
3.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
H:
TIER
2 GROUNDWATER
EVALUATION
Section
742.805
Tier
2 Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
a)
To
develop
a
groundwater
remediation
objective
under
this
Section
that
exceeds
the
applicable
Tier
1 groundwater
remediation
objective,
or
for which
there
is no
Tier
I groundwater
remediation
objective,
a
person
may
request
approval
from
the
Agency
if the
person
has performed
the following:
1)
Identified
the
horizontal
and
vertical
extent
of
groundwater
for
which
the
Tier
2 groundwater
remediation
objective
is
sought;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
2)
Taken
corrective
action,
to
the
maximum
extent
practicable
to
remove
any
free
product;
3)
Using
Equation
R26 in
accordance
with
Section
742.8
10,
demonstrated
that
the
concentration
of any
contaminant
of concern
in
groundwater
will
meet:
A)
The
applicable
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objective
at
the
point
of
human
exposure;
or
B)
For
any
contaminant
of
concern
for
which
there
is
no Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objective,
the concentration
determined
according
to the
procedures
specified in
35 III.
Adm.
Code
620
at
the
point
of human
exposure.
A person
may
request
the
Agency
to
provide
these
concentrations
or may
propose
these
concentrations
under
Subpart
I;
4)
Using
Equation
R26
in accordance
with
Section
742.8
10,
demonstrated
that
the
concentration
of
any
contaminant
of
concern
in
groundwater
within
the minimum
or
designated
maximum
setback
zone
of
an
existing
potable
water
supply
well
will
meet
the
applicable
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objective
or, if
there
is
no
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objective,
the
concentration
determined
according
to
the procedures
specified
in
35
Ill. Adm.
Code
620.
A
person
may
request
the
Agency
to
provide
these
concentrations
or
may
propose
these
concentrations
under
Subpart
I;
5)
Using
Equation
R26
in accordance
with
Section
742.8
10,
demonstrated
that
the
concentration
of
any
contaminant
of concern
in
groundwater
discharging
into
a
surface
water
will
meet
the applicable
water
quality
standard
under
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
302;
6)
Demonstrated
that
the
source
of
the
release
is
not
located
within
the
minimum
or designated
maximum
setback
zone
or
within
a
regulated
recharge
area
of
an
existing
potable
water
supply
well;
and
7)
If the
selected
corrective
action
includes
an
engineered
barrier
as set
forth
in Subpart
K to
minimize
migration
of contaminant
of
concern
from
the
soil
to
the
groundwater,
demonstrated
that
the engineered
barrier
will
remain
in
place
for
post-remediation
land
use
through
an
institutional
control
as
set
forth
in
Subpart
J.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
b)
A
groundwater
remediation
objective
that
exceeds
the
water
solubility
of
that
chemical
(refer
to
Appendix
C,
Table
E
for solubility
values)
is
not
allowed.
c)
The
contaminants
of concern
for which
a Tier
1
remediation
objective
has
been
developed
shall
be
included
in
any
mixture
of similar-acting
chemicals
under
consideration
in Tier
2.
The
evaluation
of 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.6
15
regarding
mixtures
of
similar-acting
chemicals
shall
be
considered
satisfied
for
Class
I
groundwater
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
if either
of
the following
requirements
are achieved:
1)
Calculate
the
weighted
average
using
the following
equations:
w
x1
X,
X
3
X
eve
-
+ CUOx
2
÷
CUOx
3
+
+ CUOX
where:
Wave
=
Weighted
Average
x1 through
xa
=
Concentration
of each
individual
contaminant
at
the
location
of concern.
Note
that,
depending
on
the
target
organ,
the
actual
number
of
contaminants
will
range
from
2 to
33.
CUOxa
=
A
Tier
1
or
Tier 2
remediation
objective
must
be
developed
for
each
xa.
A)
If the
value
of the
weighted
average
calculated
in accordance
with
the
equations
above
is
less than
or equal
to
1.0,
then
the
remediation
objectives
are
met for
those
chemicals.
B)
If
the
value
of the
weighted
average
calculated
in accordance
with
the
equations
above
is greater
than
1.0,
then
additional
remediation
must
be
carried
out
until
the level
of
contaminants
remaining
in
the
remediated area
has
a
weighted
average
calculated
in
accordance
with
the
equation
above
less than
or equal
to
one;
or
2)
Divide
each
individual
chemical’s
remediation
objective
by
the
number
of
chemicals
in
that
specific
target
organ
group
that
were
detected
at
the
site.
Each
of
the
contaminant
concentrations
at
the
site is
then
compared
to
the
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
remediation
objectives
that
have
been
adjusted
to
account
for this
potential
additivity.
d)
The
evaluation
of
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.615
regarding
mixtures
of
similar-acting
chemicals
are
considered
satisfied
if the
cumulative
risk
from
any
contaminant(s)
of
concern
listed
in Appendix
A,
Table
I, plus
any
other
contaminant(s)
of
concern
detected
in groundwater
and
listed
in Appendix
A,
Table
F
as
affecting
the
same
target
organlorgan
system
as
the
contaminant(s)
of concern
detected
from
Appendix
A,
Table
I,
does
not exceed
1 in
10,000.
Groundwater
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
be
developed
in accordance
with
Section
742.8
12.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
Section
742.8
12
Indoor
Inhalation
Equations
Groundwater remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
are
calculated
ujpg
the modified
J&E
model
as described
in
Section
742.7
17,
except
as
follows:
In
Equation
J&E9a,
the
total
number
of
layers
of
soil
that
contaminants
migrate
through
from
the
source
to
the
building
shall
include
a
capillary
fringe
layer.
The
thickness
of
the capillary
fringe
layer
is
17
cm.
The
volumetric
water
content
of
the capillary
fringe
shall
be 90
%
of
the
total
porosity
of
the
soil
that
comprises
the
capillary
fringe.
cii
Equation
J&E7
calculates
an
acceptable
groundwater
remediation
objective.
This
calculation
is made
using:
(1)
the
soil
gas remediation
objective
calculated
in
accordance
with
Equation
J&E4,
and
(2)
the
assumption
that
this
gas
is
in
equilibrium
with
any contamination
in the
groundwater.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
I:
TIER
3 EVALUATION
Section
742.900
Tier
3
Evaluation
Overview
a)
Tier
3
sets
forth
a
flexible
framework
to develop
remediation
objectives
outside
of
the
requirements
of Tiers
1
and 2.
Although
Tier
1 and
Tier
2 evaluations
are
not
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
prerequisites to
conduct
Tier
3
evaluations,
data
from
Tier
1 and
Tier
2
can
assist
in
developing remediation
objectives
under
a
Tier
3
evaluation.
b)
The
level
of
detail
required
to
adequately
characterize
a site
depends
on
the
particular
use
of Tier
3.
Tier
3 can
require
additional
investigative
efforts
beyond
those
described
in
Tier
2 to
characterize
the
physical
setting
of
the site.
However,
in
situations
where
remedial
efforts
have
simply
reached
a
physical
obstruction
additional
investigation
may
not
be
necessary
for
a
Tier
3
submittal.
c)
Situations
that
can
be
considered
for
a
Tier
3 evaluation
include,
but
are not
limited
to:
1)
Modification
of
parameters
not
allowed
under
Tier
2;
2)
Use
of
models
different
from
those
used
in
Tier
2;
3)
Use
of
additional
site
data to
improve
or
confirm
predictions
of
exposed
receptors
to
contaminants
of
concern;
4)
Analysis
of
site-specific
risks
using
formal
risk
assessment,
probabilistic
data
analysis,
and
sophisticated fate
and
transport
models
(e.g.,
requesting
a
target
hazard
quotient
greater
than
1 or
a
target
cancer
risk
greater
than
1
in
1,000,000);
5)
Requests
for
site-specific
remediation
objectives
because
an
assessment
indicates
further
remediation
is
not practical;
6)
Incomplete
human
exposure
pathway(s)
not
excluded
under
Subpart
C;
7)
Use
of
toxicological-specific
information
not
available
from
the
sources
listed
in Tier
2;
8)
Land
uses
which
are
substantially
different
from
the
assumed
residential
or
industriallcommercial
property
uses
of
a
site
(e.g.,
a
site
will
be
used
for
recreation
in
the future
and cannot
be
evaluated
in Tier
1
or
2);
a4
9)
Requests
for
site-specific
remediation
objectives
that
exceed
Tier
1
groundwater
remediation
objectives
so
long
as
the following
is
demonstrated:
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
A)
To
the
extent
practical,
the
exceedance
ofthe
groundwater
quality
standard
has
been minimized
and beneficial
use
appropriate
to the
groundwater
that
was impacted
has
been
returned;
and
B)
Any
threat
to
human
health
or
the
environment
has
been
minimized.
[415
ILCS
5/58.5(d)(4)(A)]
and
IQ)
Use
of
building
control
technologies,
other
than
those
described
in
Subpart
L, to
prevent
completion
of
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
d)
For
requests
of
a
target
cancer
risk
ranging
between
1 in
1,000,000
and
1
in
10,000
at the
point
of human
exposure
or a
target
hazard
quotient
greater
than
1
at
the
point
of
human
exposure,
the
requirements
of
Section
742.915
shall
be
followed.
Requests
for
a
target
cancer
risk
exceeding
1 in 10,000
at the
point
of
human
exposure
are not
allowed.
e)
Requests
for
approval
of a
Tier
3 evaluation
must
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
review
under
the
specific
program
under
which
remediation
is performed.
When
reviewing
a
submittal
under
Tier
3,
the Agency
shall
consider
whether
the
interpretations
and
conclusions
reached
are supported
by the
information
gathered.
[415
ILCS
58.7(e)(1)j.
The
Agency
shall
approve
a Tier
3
evaluation
if
the
person
submits
the
information
required
under
this
Part
and
establishes
through
such
information
that
public
health
is protected
and
that
specified
risks
to
human
health
and
the environment
have
been
minimized.
f)
If
contaminants
of
concern
include
polychiorinated
biphenyls
(PCB5),
requests
for
approval
of
a Tier
3 evaluation
must
additionally
address
the
applicability
of
40
CFR
761.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.920
Impractical
Remediation
Any
request
for
site-specific
remediation
objectives
due
to impracticality
of
remediation
shall
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
review
and
approval.
Any
request
for
site-specific
remediation
obi
ectives
due
to
impracticality
of
remediation
that
involves
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
follow
Section
742.93
5
in lieu
of
this
Section.
A
submittal
under
this
Section
shall
include
the
following
information:
a)
The
reason(s)
why
the
remediation
is
impractical;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
b)
The
extent
of
contamination;
c)
Geology,
including
soil types;
d)
The
potential
impact
to groundwater;
e)
Results
and locations
of sampling
events;
f)
Map
of the area,
including
all
utilities
and
structures;
and
g)
Present
and
post-remediation
uses of
the area
of
contamination,
including
human
receptors
at risk.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
Section
742.925
Exposure
Routes
Technical
information
may
demonstrate
that
there
is no actual
or
potential
impact
of
contaminants
of concern
to receptors
from
a
particular
exposure
route.
In
these
instances,
a
demonstration
excluding
an
exposure
route
shall be submitted
to the
Agency
for review
and
approval.
A
demonstration
that involves
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall follow
Section
742.93
5 in
lieu
of this Section.
A
submittal
under
this
Section
shall
include
the
following
information:
a)
A
description
of
the route evaluated;
b)
A description
of
the site and
physical
site characteristics;
c)
A
discussion
of
the result and
possibility
of the route
becoming
active
in the
future;
and
d)
Technical
support
that
may
include,
but
is not limited
to,
the following:
1)
a discussion
of the
natural or
man-made
barriers
to
that exposure
route;
2)
calculations
and
modeling;
3)
physical
and
chemical properties
of
contaminants
of concern;
and
4)
contaminant
migration
properties.
ILUNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
Section
742.935
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Route
Site
information
may
demonstrate
that
there
is no actual
or
potential
impact
of
contaminants
of concern
to receptors
from
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
In
such
instances,
a
demonstration
excluding
the exposure
route
shall
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
review
and approval.
A
submittal
under
this
Section
shall
include
the
following
information:
fl
A
description
of
the
site, physical
site
characteristics,
existing
and
planned
buildings,
and
existing
and
planned
manmade
pathways;
A
discussion
of the
possibility
of the
route
becoming active
in the
future;
and
Site
information
relevant
to
the
demonstration
including,
but
not
limited
to.
the
following:
Calculations
and modeling
used to
establish
remediation
objectives.
The
calculations
and
modeling
shall account
for
contaminant
transport
through
the
mechanisms
of
diffusion
and
advection.
Lu
If the
contamination
is more
than 5
feet from
an
existing
or
potential
building
or man-made
pathway,
a value
of
zero
for
the
volumetric
flow
rate of
soil gas
from
the subsurface
into
the
enclosed
space
shall be
used.
A
Qj
value
of zero
means
that
the
controlling
mode
of contaminant
transport
is
diffusion
and not
advective
or pressure-driven
movement
of
contaminants
through
the
soil and
into
the
building.
Lu)
If
the
contamination
is
within
5 feet
of
an
existing
or potential
building
or
man-made
pathway,
then a
Qj
value
of 83.33
cm
3
/sec
shall
be
used in
calculating
the Tier
3
remediation
objectives,
unless
additional
site-specific
information
indicates
a different
remediation
objective
is reasonable
and
appropriate.
)
Proposals
to
use
soil gas
data,
including
subslab
samples,
in
establishing
remediation
objectives.
Any
proposal
to
use
soil
gas data
shall
meet
the
requirements
of
subsection
(b)
of this
Section
and
Section
742.227.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Proposals
to use
building
control
technologies
supporting
the
demonstration.
Proposals
to use
building
control
technologies
shall
meet
subsection
(c)
of
this
Section
or Subpart
L of
this Part;
Any
proposals
to
use soil
gas
data,
including
subslab
samples,
to establish
remediation
objectives
for the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
for
review
and
approval.
Proposals
to
use
soil gas
data
in accordance
with
Section
742.227
shall
follow
the
requirements
of
Section
742.227
instead
of
this
Section. A
submittal
under
this
Section
shall
include
the
following
information:
1)
Scaled
map
of the
area,
showing
all
buildings
and
man-made
pathways
(current
and planned);
The current
extent
of
contamination;
Geology,
including
soil
types;
4
Depth
to
groundwater
(including
seasonal
variation)
and
flow
direction;
)
Location
of soil
gas
sampling
points;
and
A
discussion
of
soil
gas
sampling
procedures
that,
at
a minimum,
addresses
the
following:
sampling
equipment;
soil
gas
collection
protocol,
including
field
tests and
weather
conditions;
and
laboratory
analytical
methods.
ç
Any
proposals
to use
building
control
technologies
as
a
means
to
prevent
or
mitigate
human
exposures under
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
shall
be
submitted
to the
Agency
for
review
and
approval.
Proposals
to
use
a
building
control
technology
in
accordance
with
Subpart
L shall
follow
the
requirements of
Subpart
L
instead
of this
Section.
A submittal under
this
Section
shall
include
the
following
information:
j.
A
description
of
the site
and
physical
site characteristics;
)
The current extent
of
contamination;
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Geology,
including
soil types;
4)
Results
and
locations
of
sampling
events;
Scaled
map
of the
area,
including
all
buildings
and
man-made
pathways;
)
A
description
of
building
characteristics
and
methods
of
construction,
inc1udig
description
of man-made
pathways;
7)
Present
and
post-remediation
uses of
the
land
above
the area
of
contamination,
including
human
receptors
at risk;
)
A
description
of
any building
control
technologies
currently
in
place or
proposed
for
installation
that
can reduce
or
eliminate
the potential
for
completion
of the
exposure
route,
including
design
and
construction
specifications;
)
Information
regarding
the
effectiveness
of
any building
control
technologies
currently
in place
or proposed
for
installation
and
a schedule
for
performance
testing
to show
the effectiveness
of the
control
technology.
For
buildings
not
yet
constructed,
an approved
building
control
technology
shall
be in
place
and
operational
prior to
human
occupancy;
jQ)
Identification
of
documents
reviewed
and the
criteria
used
in the
documents
for
determining
whether
building
control
technologies
are
effective
and how
those
criteria
compare
to
existing
or
potential
buildings
or
man-made
pathways
at
the
site;
and
jj)
A
description
as
to how
the effectiveness
of
the
building
control
technologies
will
be
operated
and
maintained
for
the life
of the
buildings
and
man-made
pathways,
or
until soil
and
groundwater
contaminant
concentrations
have reached
remediation
objectives
that are
approved
by the
Agency.
This
includes
provisions
for
potential
extended
system
inoperability
due
to
power
failure
or
other
disruption.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
J:
]NSTITUTIONAL
CONTROLS
Section
742.1000
Institutional
Controls
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
a)
Institutional controls
in accordance
with
this
Subpart
must
be
placed
on the
property
when
remediation
objectives
are
based
on
any
of
the following
assumptions:
1)
Industrial/Commercial
property
use;
2)
Target
cancer
risk
greater
than
1 in
1,000,000;
3)
Target
hazard
quotient
greater
than
1;
4)
Engineered
barriers;
5)
The
point
of human
exposure
is
located
at
a place
other
than
at
the
source;
6)
Exclusion
of exposure
routes;
Of
7,)
Use
of an
indoor
inhalation
building
control
technology;
or
)
7
Any
combination
of the
above.
b)
The
Agency
shall
not
approve
any remediation
objective
under
this Part
that
is
based
on
the
use of
institutional
controls
unless
the
person
has
proposed
institutional
controls
meeting
the
requirements
of
this
Subpart
and
the
requirements
of the
specific
program
under
which
the
institutional
control
is
proposed.
A
proposal
for
approval
of
institutional
controls
shall
provide
identification
of the
selected
institutional
controls
from
among
the types
recognized
in
this
Subpart.
c)
The
following
instruments
may
be
institutional
controls
subject
to the
requirements of
this
Subpart
J
and
the requirements
of the
specific
program
under
which
the
institutional
control
is proposed:
1)
No
Further
Remediation
Letters;
2)
Environmental
Land
Use
Controls;
3)
Land
Use
Control
Memoranda
of
Agreement;
4)
Ordinances
adopted
and
administered
by
a unit
of local
government;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
5)
Agreements
between
a
property
owner
(or,
in
the
case
of a
petroleum
leaking
underground
storage
tank,
the
owner
or
operator
of
the tank)
and
a
highway
authority
with
respect
to
any contamination
remaining
under
highways;
and
6)
Agreements
between
a highway
authority,
which
is
also the
property
owner
(or, in
the case
of
a
petroleum
leaking
underground
storage
tank,
the owner
or operator
of the
tank)
and the
Agency
with
respect
to any
contamination
remaining
under
the
highways.
d)
No
Further
Remediation
Letters
and
Environmental
Land
Use
Controls
that
meet
the
requirements
of
this
Subpart
and
the
recording
requirements
of
the
program
under
which
remediation
is
being performed
are
transferred
with
the property.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.1010
Environmental
Land
Use
Controls
a)
An
Environmental
Land
Use
Control
(ELUC)
is
an
institutional
control
that
may
be
used under
this
Part
to impose
land
use
limitations
or
requirements
related
to
environmental
contamination.
ELUCs
are
only
effective
when
approved
by
the
Agency
in accordance
with
this Part.
Activities
or
uses
that may
be limited
or
required
include,
but are
not
limited
to, prohibition
of
use
of
groundwater
for
potable
purposes,
restriction
to industrial/commercial
uses,
operation
or
maintenance
of
engineered
barriers,
indoor
inhalation
building
control
technologies,
or worker
safety
plans.
ELUCs
may
be
used in
the
following
circumstances:
1)
When
No Further
Remediation
Letters
are not
available,
including
but
not
limited
to
when
contamination
has
migrated
off-site
or outside
the
remediation
site; or
2)
When
No
Further
Remediation
Letters
are
not
issued
under
the
program
for
which
a
person
is
undergoing
remediation.
b)
Recording
requirements:
1)
An
ELUC
approved
by
the
Agency
pursuant
to this
Section
must
be
recorded
in
the
Office
of
the Recorder
or
Registrar
of Titles
for
the
county
in which
the
property
that
is
the
subject
of the
ELUC
is
located.
A
copy
of the
ELUC
demonstrating
that
it has been
recorded
must
be submitted
to
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
the
Agency
before
the
Agency
will
issue
a no
further
remediation
determination.
2)
An ELUC
approved
under
this Section
will
not become
effective
until
officially
recorded
in
the chain
of
title
for
the
property
that
is the
subject
of the
ELUC
in
accordance
with
subsection
(b)(1)
of
this
Section.
3)
Reference
to
the
recorded
ELUC
must
be made
in
the
instrument
memorializing
the
Agency’s
no further
remediation
determination.
Recording
of the
no
further
remediation
determination
and
confirmation
of
recording
must
be
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of the
program
under
which
the
determination
was
issued.
4)
The
requirements
of
this
Section
do
not
apply
to Federally
Owned
Property
for
which
the
Federal
Landholding
Entity
does
not have
the
authority
under
federal
law
to
record
land
use
limitations
on the
chain
of
title.
5)
The
requirements
of this
Section
apply
only
to
those
sites
for
which
a
request
for
a no further
remediation
determination
has
not yet
been
made
to the
Agency
by
January
6, 2001.
c)
Duration:
1)
Except
as
provided
in
this
subsection
(c),
an
ELUC
shall
remain
in
effect
in perpetuity.
2)
At no
time
shall
any
site
for
which
an
ELUC
has
been
imposed
as
a result
of remediation
activities
under
this
Part
be
used
in a manner
inconsistent
with
the
land
use
limitation
unless
attainment
of
objectives
appropriate
for
the
new
land
use
is achieved
and
a new
no
further
remediation
determination
has
been
obtained and
recorded
in
accordance
with
the
program
under
which
the ELUC
was
first imposed
or the
Site
Remediation
Program
(35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
740).
[415
ILCS
5
8.8(c)].
In
addition,
the
appropriate
release
or
modification
of the
ELUC
must
be
prepared
by
the
Agency
and
filed
on
the
chain
of
title
for
the
property
that
is the
subject
of
the
ELUC.
A)
For
a
Leaking
Underground
Storage
Tank
(LUST)
site
under
35
Ill. Adm.
Code
731
or
732
or a Site
Remediation
Program
site
under
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
740,
an
ELUC
maybe
released
or
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
modified
oniy
if
the
NFR
Letter
is
also
modified
under
the
Site
Remediation
Program
to
reflect
the change;
B)
For
a RCRA
site
under
35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
721
730,
an ELUC
may
be
released
or
modified
only
if
there
is also
an amended
certification
of
closure
or
a
permit
modification.
3)
In addition
to
any
other
remedies
that
may
be
available,
a failure
to
comply
with
the limitations
or
requirements
of
an ELUC
may
result
in
voidance
of
an
Agency no
further
remediation
determination
in
accordance
with
the
program
under
which
the
determination
was
made.
The
failure
to
comply with
the
limitations
or
requirements
of
an
ELUC
may
also
be
grounds
for
an
enforcement
action
pursuant
to Title
VIII
of
the
Act.
d)
An
ELUC
submitted
to
the Agency
must
match
the
form
and
contain
the
same
substance,
except
for
variable elements
(e.g.,
name
of
property
owner),
as the
model
in
Appendix
F and
must
contain
the
following
elements:
1)
Name
of
property
owners
and
declaration
of
property
ownership;
2)
Identification
of the
property
to
which
the
ELUC
applies
by
common
address,
legal
description,
and
Real
Estate
Tax
Index/Parcel
Index
Number;
3)
A reference to
the
Bureau
of Land
LPC
numbers
or
10-digit
identification
numbers
under
which
the
remediation
was
conducted;
4)
A
statement
of the
reason
for
the
land
use
limitation
or
requirement
relative
to protecting human
health
and
the
surrounding
environment
from
soil,
groundwater,
andlor
other
environmental
contamination;
5)
The
language
instituting
such
land
use
limitations
or
requirements;
6)
A statement
that
the
limitations
or
requirements
apply
to the
current
owners,
occupants,
and
all
heirs,
successors,
assigns,
and
lessees;
7)
A
statement
that
the
limitations
or
requirements
apply
in
perpetuity
or
until:
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
A)
The
Agency determines
that
there
is
no longer
a need for
the
ELUC;
B)
The Agency,
upon
written
request, issues
to the site that
received
the
no further remediation
determination
that
relies
on the
ELUC
a
new no further
remediation
determination
approving
modification
or removal
of the
limitations
or
requirements;
C)
The
new
no further
remediation
determination
is filed
on
the
chain
of title
of the site
subject to the no
further remediation
determination;
and
D)
A
release
or modification
of
the
land
use limitation
is filed
on
the
chain
of title for the property
that is
the subject
of the
ELUC;
8)
Scaled site
maps showing:
A)
The legal
boundary
of the
property to which
the ELUC
applies;
B)
The
horizontal
and
vertical
extent
of contaminants
of
concern
above applicable
remediation
objectives
for
soil and
groundwater
to which the
ELUC applies;
C)
Any physical
features to
which an ELUC
applies (e.g.,
engineered
barriers,
monitoring
wells,
caps, indoor
inhalation
building
control
technologies);
and
D)
The nature, location
of the
source, and direction
of
movement
of
the
contaminants
of concern;
9)
A statement
that
any information
regarding
the remediation
performed
on
the property for which
the ELUC
is necessary may
be
obtained
from
the
Agency
through
a request
under
the
Freedom
of Information
Act
[5
ILCS
140] and rules
promulgated
thereunder;
and
10)
The dated, notarized
signatures
of the
property
owners
or authorized
agent.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
effective
Section 742.1015
Ordinances
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
a)
An
ordinance
adopted
by
a unit
of local
government
that
effectively
prohibits
the
installation
of potable
water
supply
wells
(and
the
use
of such
wells)
may
be
used
as an
institutional
control
to meet
the requirements
of Section
742.320(d)
or
742.805(a)(3)
if the
requirements
of
this
Section
are
met.
A
model
ordinance
is
found
in
Appendix
G.
Ordinances
prohibiting
the
installation
of
potable
water
supply
wells
(and
the
use
of such
wells)
that
do not
expressly
prohibit
the
installation
of
potable
water
supply
wells
(and
the
use of
such
wells)
by
units
of
local
government
may
be
acceptable
as
institutional
controls
if the
requirements
of this
Section
are met
and
a Memorandum
of
Understanding
(MOU)
is
entered
into
under
subsection
(i)
of this
Section.
For
purposes
of this
Section,
a
unit
of
local
government
is
considered
to
be expressly
prohibited
from
installing
and
using
potable
water
supply
wells
only
if
the unit
of
local
government
is
included
in the
prohibition
provision
by
name.
The
prohibition
required
by
this
Section
shall
satisfy
the
following
requirements
at
a
minimum:
1)
The
prohibition
shall
not
allow
exceptions
for
potable
water
well
installation
and
use other
than
for the
adopting
unit
of
local
government;
2)
The
prohibition
shall
apply
at
all
depths
and
shall
not
be
limited
to
particular
aquifers
or other
geologic
formations;
3)
If
the prohibition
does
not
apply
everywhere
within
the
boundaries
of the
unit
of
local
government,
the
limited
area
to which
the
prohibition
applies
shall
be
easily
identifiable
and clearly
defined
by the
ordinance
(e.g.,
narrative
descriptions
accompanied
by maps
with
legends
or
labels
showing
prohibition
boundaries,
narrative
descriptions
using
fixed,
common
reference
points
such
as
street
names).
Boundaries
of
prohibitions
limited
by
area
shall
be fixed
by
the
terms
of
the
ordinance
and
shall
not
be
subject
to
change
without
amending
the ordinance
in
which
the
prohibition
has
been
adopted
(e.g.,
no
boundaries
defined
with
reference
to zoning
districts
or
the availability
of
the
public
water
supply);
and
4)
The
prohibition
shall
not
in
any way
restrict
or limit
the
Agency’s
approval
of the
use
of the
ordinance
as
an
institutional
control
pursuant
to
this
Part
(e.g.,
no
restrictions
based
on
remediation
program
participation,
no
restrictions
on
persons
performing
remediation
within
the
prohibition
area
who
may
use
the
ordinance).
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
b)
A
request
for
approval
of a
local
ordinance
as an
institutional
control
shall
provide
the following:
1)
A copy
of
the
ordinance
restricting
groundwater
use certified
by an
official
of the
unit of
local government
in
which
the
site
is located
that
it is
a
true
and
accurate
copy of
the ordinance,
unless
the Agency
and
the
unit
of local
government
have entered
an
agreement
under
subsection
(i)
of
this
Section,
in
which
case
the
request
may
alternatively
reference
the
MOU.
The
ordinance
must
demonstrate
that
potable
use
of groundwater
from
potable
water
supply
wells
is
prohibited;
2)
A scaled
map(s)
delineating
the
area
and extent
of
groundwater
contamination
modeled
above
the
applicable
remediation
objectives
includingany
measured
data
showing
concentrations
of
contaminants
of
concern
in
which
the
applicable
remediation
objectives
are
exceeded;
3)
A scaled
map
delineating
the
boundaries
of
all properties
under
which
groundwater
is
located
which
exceeds
the
applicable
groundwater
remediation
objectives;
4)
Information
identifying
the
current
owner(s)
of
each property
identified
in
subsection
(b)(3)
of this
Section;
and
5)
A
copy of
the proposed
written
notification
to
the unit
of local
government
that
adopted
the ordinance
and to
the
current
owners
identified
in
subsection
(b)(4)
of this
Section
that includes
the
following
information:
A)
The
name
and address
of the
unit
of
local
government
that
adopted
the
ordinance;
B)
The
ordinance’s
citation;
C)
A
description
of
the
property
being
sent
notice
by adequate
legal
description,
reference
to
a
plat
showing
the boundaries
of
the
property,
or by
accurate
street
address;
D)
Identification
of the
party
requesting
to
use
the
groundwater
ordinance
as
an institutional
control,
and a
statement
that
the
party
has
requested
approval
from
the Agency
to use the
ordinance
as
an
institutional
control;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
E)
A statement
that
use
of the
ordinance
as an
institutional
control
allows
contamination
above
groundwater
ingestion
remediation
objectives
to
remain
in
groundwater
beneath
the
affected
properties,
and
that
the
ordinance
strictly
prohibits
human
and
domestic
consumption
of
the
groundwater;
F)
A
statement
as
to the
nature
of
the
release
and
response
action
with
the
site
name,
site
address,
and
Agency
site
number
or
Illinois
inventory
identification
number;
and
G)
A statement
that
more
information
about
the
remediation
site
may
be
obtained
by
contacting
the
party
requesting
the
use
of
the
groundwater
ordinance
as an
institutional
control
or
by
submitting
a
FOIA
request
to
the
Agency.
c)
Written
notification
proposed
pursuant
to
subsection
(b)(5)
of this
Section
must
be
sent
to the
unit
of
local
government
that
adopted
the
ordinance
as
well
as
all
current
property
owners identified
in
subsection
(b)(4).
Written
proof
that
the
notification
was
sent
to
the
unit
of
local
government
and
the
property
owners
shall
be
submitted
to the
Agency
within
45
days
from
the
date
the
Agency’s
no
further
remediation
determination
is
recorded.
Such
proof
may
consist
of the
return
card
from
certified
mail,
return
receipt
requested,
a
notarized
certificate
of service,
or
a
notarized
affidavit.
d)
Unless
the Agency
and
the
unit
of
local
government
have
entered
into
a
MOU
under
subsection
(i)
of this
Section,
the
current
owner
or
successors
in
interest
of
a
site
who
have
received
approval
of
use of
an
ordinance
as
an
institutional
control
under
this
Section shall:
1)
Monitor
activities
of
the
unit
of local
government
relative
to
variance
requests
or
changes
in
the
ordinance
relative
to
the
use
ofpotable
groundwater
at properties
identified
in
subsection
(b)(3)
of
this
Section;
and
2)
Notify
the
Agency
of
any
approved variance
requests
or
ordinance
changes
within
30
days
after
the
date
such
action
has
been
approved.
e)
The
information
required
in subsections
(b)(
1)
through
(b)(5)
of this
Section
and
the
Agency
letter
approving
the
groundwater
remediation
objective
shall
be
submitted to
the
unit
of
local
government.
Proof
that
the
information
has
been
filed
with
the
unit
of
local
government
shall
be
provided
to
the
Agency.
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
f)
Any ordinance
or MOU
used
as
an
institutional
control
pursuant
to this
Section
shall
be recorded
in
the
Office
of the
Recorder
or
Registrar
of Titles
of the
county
in
which
the site
is
located
together
with the
instrument
memorializing
the
Agency’s
no
further
remediation
determination
pursuant
to the
specific
program
within
45
days
after receipt
of the
Agency’s
no further
remediation
determination.
g)
An
institutional
control
approved
under
this
Section
shall
not
become
effective
until
officially
recorded
in accordance
with subsection
(f)
of this
Section.
The
person
receiving
the
approval
shall
obtain
and
submit
to the
Agency
within
30
days
after
recording
a copy
of
the institutional
control
demonstrating
that
it
has
been
recorded.
h)
The
following
shall
be
grounds
for
voidance
of the
ordinance
as an
institutional
control
and
the
instrument
memorializing
the
Agency’s
no further
remediation
determination:
1)
Modification
of
the ordinance
by the
unit
of
local
government
to
allow
potable
use
of
groundwater;
2)
Approval
of
a
site-specific
request,
such
as a
variance,
to allow
potable
use of
groundwater
at a site
identified
in
subsection
(b)(3) of
this
Section;
3)
Violation
of
the terms
of
an
institutional
control
recorded
under
Section
742.1005
or
Section
742.1010;
or
4)
Failure
to
provide
notification
and
proof
of such
notification
pursuant
to
subsection
(c)
of this
Section.
i)
The Agency
and
a
unit
of local
government
may
enter
into
a
MOU
under this
Section
if the
unit
of local
government
has
adopted
an
ordinance
satisfying
subsection
(a) of
this
Section
and
if
the requirements
of
this
subsection
are
met.
The
MOU
submitted
to the
Agency
must
match
the
form
and
contain
the
same
substance
as the
model
in Appendix
H
and
shall
include
the
following:
1)
Identification
of
the authority
of
the unit
of
local
government
to
enter
the
MOU;
2)
Identification
of
the legal
boundaries,
or
equivalent,
under
which
the
ordinance
is applicable;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
3)
A
certified
copy
of
the ordinance;
4)
A
commitment
by
the
unit of
local
government
to notify
the
Agency
of
any
variance
requests
or proposed
ordinance
changes
at
least
30
days
prior
to
the
date the
local
government
is
scheduled
to
take
action
on
the
request
or proposed
change;
5)
A
commitment
by
the
unit
of local
government
to
maintain
a registry
of all
sites
within
the unit
of
local
government
that
have
received
no
further
remediation
determinations
pursuant
to
specific
programs;
and
6)
If the
ordinance
does
not expressly
prohibit
the installation
of
potable
water
supply
wells
(and
the
use
of
such
wells)
by
units
of
local
government,
a conimitment
by
the
unit
of
local
govermnent:
A)
To
review
the
registry
of
sites
established
under
subsection
(i)(5)
of
this Section
prior
to
siting
potable
water
supply
wells
within
the
area
covered
by the
ordinance;
B)
To
determine
whether
the
potential
source
of potable
water
may
be
or has
been
affected
by
contamination
left
in place
at
those
sites;
and
C)
To
take
whatever
steps
are
necessary
to
ensure
that
the
potential
source
of
potable
water
is
protected
from
the
contamination
or
treated
before
it is
used
as a potable
water
supply.
fl
A
groundwater
ordinance may
not
be used
to
exclude
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure route.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
SUBPART
K:
ENGINEERED
BARRIERS
Section
742.1105
Engineered
Barrier
Requirements
a)
Natural
attenuation,
access
controls,
and
point
of use
treatment
shall
not
be
considered engineered
barriers.
Engineered
barriers
may
not
be used
to
prevent
direct
human
exposure
to groundwater
without
the
use
of
institutional
controls.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
b)
For purposes
of
determining
remediation
objectives
under
Tier
1, engineered
barriers
are
not recognized.
c)
The
following
engineered
barriers
are
recognized
for
purposes
of calculating
remediation
objectives
that exceed
residential
remediation
objectives:
1)
For
the soil
component
of the
groundwater
ingestion
exposure
route,
the
following
engineered
barriers
are
recognized
if they
prevent
completion
of
the exposure
pathway:
A)
Caps
or
walls
constructed
of compacted
clay,
asphalt,
concrete
or
other
material
approved
by the
Agency;
and
B)
Permanent
structures
such
as
buildings
and
highways.
2)
For
the soil
ingestion
exposure
route,
the
following
engineered
barriers
are
recognized
if they
prevent
completion
of the
exposure
pathway:
A)
Caps
or
walls
constructed
of
compacted
clay,
asphalt,
concrete,
or
other material
approved
by
the Agency;
B)
Permanent
structures
such
as buildings
and
highways;
and
C)
Soil, sand,
gravel,
or other
geologic
materials
that:
i)
Cover
the
contaminated
media;
ii)
Meet
the soil
remediation
objectives
under
Subpart
E
for
residential
property
for contaminants
of
concern;
and
iii)
Are
a
minimum
of three
feet in
depth.
3)
For the
outdoor
inhalation
exposure
route,
the
following
engineered
barriers
are
recognized
if
they
prevent
completion
of
the exposure
pathway:
A)
Caps
or
walls
constructed
of
compacted
clay,
asphalt,
concrete,
or
other
material
approved
by
the Agency;
B)
Permanent
structures
such
as
buildings
and
highways;
and
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
C)
Soil,
sand,
gravel,
or
other
geologic
materials
that:
i)
Cover
the
contaminated
media;
ii)
Meet
the
soil
remediation
objectives
under
Subpart
E
for
residential
property
for
contaminants
of
concern;
and
iii)
Are
a minimum
often
feet
in
depth
and
not
within
ten
feet
of
any
manmade
pathway.
4)
For
the
ingestion
of groundwater
exposure
route,
the
following
engineered
barriers
are
recognized
if they
prevent
completion
of
the
exposure
pathway:
A)
Slurry
walls;
and
B)
Hydraulic
control
of groundwater.
d)
Unless
otherwise
prohibited
under
Section
742.1100,
any
other
type
of
engineered
barrier
may
be
proposed
if it will
be
as
effective
as
the
options
listed
in
subsection
(c)
of this
Section.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
SUBPART
L:
BUILDING
CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES
Section
742.1200
Building
Control
Technologies
Any
person
who
develops
remediation
objectives
under
this
Part
based
on
building
control
technologies
shall
meet
the
requirements
of
this
Subpart
and
the
requirements
of
Subpart
J
relative
to institutional
controls.
The
Agency
shall
not
approve
any
remediation
objective
under
this Part
that
is
based
on the
use
of
building
control
technologies
unless
the person
has
proposed
building
control
technologies
meeting
the
requirements
of this
Subpart
and
Subpart
J
relative
to
institutional
controls.
The
use
of building
control
technologies
can
be recognized
in determining
remediation
objectives
only
if
the
building
control
technologies
are
intended
for
use
as part
of
the
final
corrective
action.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
For
buildings
not
yet
constructed,
an
approved
building
control
technology
shall
be in
place
and
operational
prior
to human
occupancy.
Any no
further
remediation
determination
based
upon
the
use
of
building
control
technologies
shall
require
effective maintenance
of
the
building control
technology.
The maintenance
requirements
shall be
included
in
an
institutional
control under
Subpart
J.
This
institutional
control
shall
address provisions
for
inoperability
by requiring
the
following
if the
building
control
technology
is
rendered
inoperable:
1)
The
site owner/operator
shall
notify
building
occupants
and
workers
in
advance
of
intrusive activities.
Such
notification
shall
enumerate
the
contaminant
of concern
known
to be present;
and
The
site
owner/operator
shall
require
building
occupants
and
workers
to
implement
protective
measures consistent
with good
industrial
hygiene
practice.
Failure to
maintain
a building
control
technology
in accordance
with
that
no
further
remediation
determination
shall
be
grounds
for
voidance
of the
determination
and
the
instrument
memorializing
the
Agency’s
no
further
remediation
determination.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
Section
742.1205
Building
Control
Technology
Proposals
A
proposal
to use
a
building
control technology
under
this
Subpart shall
include
the
followiig
information:
A
description
of
the
site
and physical
site characteristics;
The
current
extent
and
modeled migration
of contamination;
Geology,
including
soil types;
4
Results
and
locations
of sampling
events;
Scaled
map
of the
area, including
all
buildings
and man-made
pathways;
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMEIMENTS
A
description
of
building characteristics
and
methods
of
construction,
including
a
description of
man-made
pathways;
and
g
Present
and
post-remediation
uses
of the
land
above
the
area
of
contamination,
including
human
receptors
at
risk.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
Section
742.1210
Building
Control
Technology
Requirements
)
Natural
attenuation,
access
controls,
and
point
of use
treatment
shall
not
be
considered building
control
technologies.
)
For
purposes
of
determining
remediation
objectives
under
Tier
1,
building
control
technologies
are not
recognized.
The
following
building
control
technologies
are recognized
for
purposes
of
determining
remediation
objectives
that
exceed
residential
remediation
objectives:
1)
Sub-slab depressurization
(SSD)
systems
meeting
the
following
requirements:
A suction pit is
installed
that is
at least
4
cubic
feet
and
extends
at
least
16
inches
below
the
slab:
A
PVC
pipe
of
at
least
4
inches
in
diameter
extends
from
the
suction
pit
to
the intake
side of
an
in-line
fan
with
a
flow
rate
of
at
least
5.7
cubic
meters/mm
at
249 pascals;
)
All
visible
cracks
and
joints
in the
slab
(including
the
place
where
the
pipe
exits
the
slab)
are
sealed;
The
pipe
exhausts
outside
the
building
at least
10
feet
above
ground
and
at
least
10
feet
from
any door
or
window;
and
An additional
suction
pit meeting
the
requirements
of
(A)
shall
be
installed
in
any
area
separated
by a
sub-slab
grade
beam.
Sub-membrane depressurization
(SMD)
systems
meeting
the
following
requirements:
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
A
non-woven
geotextile
is installed
on
the
exposed
earthen
material;
A
cross-laminated
polyethylene
membrane
liner
at
least
0.15
mm
(or
6
miD
thick
is
placed
over
the
geotextile
and
sealed
to
foundation
walls
using
acrylic
latex
adhesive;
)
A
4-inch
diameter
PVC
pipe
extends
from
a hole
cut
in
the
liner
to
the
intake
side
of
an
in-line
fan with
a
flow
rate
of
at least
5.7
cubic
meters/mm
at 249
pascals;
The
pipe
is sealed
to the
liner;
The
pipe
exhausts
outside
the
building
at least
10
feet
above
ground
and
at
least
10 feet
from
any
door
or
window;
and
A
smoke
test
of
the
membrane
system,
in
accordance
with
the
manufacturer’s
requirements,
is
preformed
to
ensure
no
leaks
exist.
Where
leaks
are
identified,
appropriate
repairs
are undertaken
and
smoke
testing
repeated
until
no
leaks
are detected.
Membrane
barrier
systems
meeting
the
following
requirements:
The membrane
is impermeable
to
volatile
chemicals
and
is
not
less
than
1.5 mm
(or
60
mu)
thick;
The
membrane
is sealed
to
foundation
walls
and
any
penetrating
pipes:
The membrane
is installed
in accordance
with
the manufacturer’s
requirements
and
by
an
applicator
trained
and
approved
by the
manufacturer.
j
A smoke
test
of the
membrane
system,
in
accordance
with
the
manufacturer’s
requirements,
is performed
to
ensure
no
leaks
exist.
Where
leaks
are
identified,
appropriate
repairs
are
undertaken
and
smoke
testing
repeated
until
no leaks
are
detected;
The
membrane
is
puncture
resistant
to slab
installation
construction activities;
and
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
)
Construction
activities
following
membrane
installation
do
not
damage,
puncture
or tear
the
membrane
or
otherwise
compromise
its
ability
to prevent
the migration
of
volatile
chemicals.
4)
Geologic
materials
meeting
the following
requirements:
)
The
geologic
materials
cover
the
contaminated
soil
and
groundwater;
)
The
geologic
materials
meet
the
soil
remediation
objectives
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
under
Subpart
E
for
residential
property
for
the
contaminants
of
concern;
and
)
The
geologic
materials
have
sufficient
depth
such
that,
using
Tier
2
or Tier
3
evaluation
procedures
as
approved
by
the
Agency,
completion
of
the exposure
route
is
prevented
for
any
building
or
man-made
pathway.
(Source: Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
A:
General
Section
742.TABLE
A:
Soil Saturation
Limits
(Csat)
for
Chemicals
Whose
Melting
Point
is
Less
than
30° C
1,2 Dichioroeti
‘
1,2
Dichloropropanc
4T
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
For
the
Soil
Component
of
For the
Outdoor
the
Groundwater
Inhalation
Ingestion
Exposure
Routea
Exposure
Route”
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
C(rng/kg)
C
(mg/çg
67-64-1
Acetone
1.OOE+05
2.OOE+05
71-43-2
Benzene
8
.OOE+02
5. 80E+02
111-44-4
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
3.OOE+03
3.90E+03
1 17-81-7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
2.OOE+02
6.80E+01
75-27-4
Bromodichioromethane
(Dichiorobromomethane)
2.80E+03
2.OOE+03
75-25-2
Bromoform
2.00E+03
1.20E+03
71-36-3
Butanol
1.OOE+04
1.60E+04
78-93-3
2-Butanone
(MEK)
2.50E+04
4.50E+04
85-68-7
Butyl
benzyl
phthalate
1.OOE+03
3.40E+02
75-15-0
Carbon
disulfide
8.50E+02
5.20E+02
56-23-5
Carbon
tetrachioride
1.20E+03
5.60E+02
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
(Monochlorobenzene)
6.20E+02
2.90E+02
124-48-1
Chlorodibromomethane
(Dibromochioromethane)
1 .40E+03
8.90E+02
67-66-3
Chloroform
3.40E+03
2.50E+03
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
b
(ionizable
organic)
1.OOE+05
7.OOE+04
75-99-0
Dalapon
I .20E+05
1
.90E+05
96-12-8
1
,2-Dibromo-3
-chloropropane
6.90E+02
4.30E+02
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
(Ethylene
dibromide)
1.60E+03
1.20E+03
84-74-2
Di-n-butyl
phthalate
2.60E+03
8.80E+02
95-50-1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
(o-Dichlorobenzene)
5.60E+02
2.1OE+02
75-71-8
Dichiorofluoromethane
8.70E+04
4.30E+02
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
For the
Soil
Component
of
For the
Outdoor
the
Groundwater
Inhalation
Ingestion
Exposure
Rout&’
ciosure
Route’
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
C
(mg/kg)
C
(mg/kg)
75-34-3
1.1
-Dichioroethane
1
.70E+03
1
.40E+03
107-06-2
l,2-Dichloroethane
(Ethylene
dichloride)
l.90E+03
2.1OE+03
75-35-4
1,1
-Dichioroethylene
1 .40E+03
9.1
OE+02
156-59-2
cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethylene
1
.30E+03
i
.oo+o
1 5
6-60-5
trans-i
,2-Dichloroethylene
3 .OOE+03
2.1
OE+03
78-87-5
1
,2-Dichloropropane
1 .20E+03
8.70E+02
542-75-6
1
,3-Dichloropropene
(1,3
-Dichioropropylene,
cis
+ trans)
1
.OOE+03
8.50E+02
84-66-2
Diethyl
phthalate
2.20E+03
9.20E+02
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethylphenol
1.OOE+04
4.70E+03
1
17-84-0
Di-n-octyl
phthalate
i.60E+0i
5.20E+00
123-91-i
p-Dioxane
1.OOE+05
2.OOE+05
100-41-4
Ethylbenzene
3
.50E+02
1 .50E+02
77-47-4
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
1
.30E+02
4.40E+0
1
78-59-1
Isophorone
3.OOE+03
3.OOE+03
98-82-8
Isopropylbenzene
(Cumene)
9.40E+02
4.OOE+02
7439-97-6
Mercury
(elemental)
3.1OE+00
3.1OE+00
72-43-5
Methoxychlor
i.40E+01
4.50E+00
74-83-9
Methyl
bromide
(Bromomethane)
3.1 OE+03
3
.60E+03
1
634-04
.4
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
8 .40E+03
1.1
OE+04
75-09-2
Methylene
chloride
(Dichloromethane)
2.5
OE+03
3 .OOE+03
9
8-95-3
Nitrobenzene
7.1
OE+02
5
.90E+02
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
CASNo.
Chemical Name
621-64-7
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
1 .90E+03
100-42-5
Styrene
6.30E+02
127-1
8-4
Tetrachloroethylene
(Perchioroethylene)
8 .OOE+02
108-88-3
Toluene
5.80E+02
120-82-1
1
,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
3
.40E+02
71
-5 5-6
1,1,1
-Trichloroethane
1.3
OE+03
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichioroethane
1.80E+03
79-01-6
Trichioroethylene
1 .20E+03
75-69-4
Trichiorofluoromethane
1 .80E+03
108-05-4
Vinyl
acetate
2.26E+03
75-01-4
Vinyl
chloride
2.60E+03
108-38-3
m-Xylene
4.1OE+02
95-47-6
o-Xylene
3.70E+02
106-42-3
p-Xylene
3.30E+02
1330-20-7
Xylenes
(total)
2.80E+02
Soil
Saturation
Limits
calculated
using
an
foc
of
0.006
g/g
and
a system
temperature
of 25°C.
Soil
Saturation
Limits
calculated
using
an foc
of 0.002
g/g
and
a
system
temperature
of 25°C.
c,
for pH
of 6.8.
If
soil
pH
is other
than
6.8. a
site-specific
C
should
be
calculated
using
equations
S19
and
S29 and
the
For
the Outdoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Routea
(mg/kg)
For
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
sure
Routeb
csajrnwkg)
pH-specific
Koc
values
in
Appendix
C Table
I.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDJX
A General
Section
742.TABLE
E
Similar-Acting
Noncarcinogenic
Chemicals
Adrcnal
Cland
Nitrobenzene
1,2,4
Trichlorobenzene
(Ingestion
only)
Kidney
Acetone (Ingestion
only)
Cadmium
(Ingestion
only)
Chlorobenzene
Dalapon
1,1
Dichloroethane
Di
n octyl
phthalate
(Ingestion
only)
Endosulfan
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Methyl
tertiary
butyl
ether
(Inhalation
only)
Nitrobenzene
Toluene
(Ingestion
only)
2,4,5
Trichiorophenol
Vinyl
acetate
(Ingestion
only)
Liver
Acenaphthene
Acetone
(Ingestion
only)
Butylbenzyl phthalate
(Ingestion
only)
Chlorobenzene
(Ingestion
only)
1,1
Dichloroethylene
(Ingestion
only)
Di
n
octyl
phthalate
(Ingestion
only)
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Methyl tertiary
butyl
ether
(Inhalation
only)
Nitrobenzene
Picloram
Styrene
(Ingestion only)
2,4,5
TP (Silvex)
Toluene
(Ingestion
only)
1’IA
(Inhalation
only)
Central
Nervous
System
Butanol
(Ingestion
only)
Cyanide
(amenable)
2,4
Dimethylphenol
Endrin
Manganese
2 Methylphenol
Mercury
(Inhalation
only)
Styrene
(Inhalation
only)
Toluene
(Inhalation only)
Xylenes
(Ingestion
only)
Circulatory
System
Antimony
Barium
(Ingestion
only)
2,4
D
cis
1,2
Dichloro
ethylene
(Ingestion
only)
Nitrobenzene
trans
1,2 Dichioroethylene
(Ingestion
only)
2,4 Dimethylphenol
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Styrene
(Ingestion only)
Zie
Gastrointestinal
System
Beryllium
(Ingestion
only)
Endothall
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
(Ingestion
only)
Methyl
bromide
(Ingestion
only)
Methyl
tertiary
butyl
ether
(Ingestion
only)
— ,—,
2,4,5
Trichlorophenol
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Immune
System
2,4 Dichiorophenol
p
Chioroaniline
Mercury
(gestion
only)
Reproductive
System
Bamim
(Inhalation
only)
Boron
(Ingestion
only)
Carbon disulfide
2
Chiorophenol
(Ingestion
only)
1,2 Dibromo
3
Chioropropane
(Inhalation
only)
Dinoseb
Ethylbenzene
(Inhalation
only)
Methoxychior
Phenol
Respiratory
System
1,2 Dichioropropane
(Inhalation
only)
1,3 Dichioropropylene
(Inhalation
only)
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
(Inhalation
only)
Methyl
bromide (Inhalation
only)
Nanhthalene
(Inhalation
only)
Toluene
(Inhalation
only)
Vinyl
acetate
(Inhalation
only)
Cholincstcrase
Inhibition
Aldicarb
Carbofuran
Decreased
Body Weight
C pins
and
Circulatory
System
Effects
Atrazine
Simazine
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Adrenal
Gland
Decreased
Body
Weight
Gain
(continued)
Isopropylbenzene
Ensosulfan
2-Methylphenol
(o-cresol)
Cholinesterase
Inhibition
Naphthalene
(ingestion
only)
Aldicarb
Nickel
(ingestion
only)
Carbofuran
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Phenol
(ingestion
only)
Circulatory
System
Simazine
Alachlor
Tetrachioroethylene
(ingestion
only)
Antimony
(ingestion
only)
1,1,1-Trichioroethane
(ingestion
only)
Benzene
Vinyl
acetate
(ingestion
only)
Cobalt
(ingestion
only)
Xylenes
(Res.
&
TIC
only)
(ingestion
only)
2,4-D
cis-l,2-Dichloroethylene
(ingestion
only)
Endocrine
System
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Cyanide
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
1
,2-Dibromoethane
(ingestion
only)
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl
phthalate
(ingestion
only)
Ensosulfan
Nitrobenzene
Fluoranthene
l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
(ingestion
only)
Fluorene
Methylene
Chloride
(inhalation
only)
Nickel
(Res.
&
I/C
only)
(inhalation
only)
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Nitrate
as
N
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Nitrobenzene
Polychiorinated
biphenyls
(PCBs)
Selenium
Trichioroethylene
Simazine
Styrene
(ingestion
only)
Gastrointestinal
System
1,3
,5-Trinitrobenzene
Beryllium
(ingestion
only)
Zinc
Copper
1 ,3-Dichloropropene
(cis
+
trans)
(ingestion
only)
Decreased
Body
Weight
Gain
Endothall
Atrazine
Fluoride
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
(ingestion
only)
Cyanide
Iron
1
,2-Dichlorobenzene
(inhalation
only)
Methyl
bromide
(ingestion
only)
Diethyl
phthalate
(ingestion
only)
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
(ingestion
only)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Immune
System
4-Chioroaniline
2,4-Dichiorophenol
Mercury
(ingestion
only)
Polychiorinated
biphenyls (PCBs)
Kidney
Acetone
(ingestion
only)
Aldrin
(CW
only)
Barium
Bromodichioromethane
(ingestion
only)
Cadmium
2,4-D
Dalapon
1,1
-Dichloroethane
1
,2-Dichloroethane
(CW
only)
(ingestion
only)
Ensosulfan
Ethylbenzene (ingestion
only)
Fluoranthene
gamma-HCH
(gamma-BHC)
Hexachloroethane
(ingestion
only)
Isopropylbenzene
MCPP
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
(inhalation
only)
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Pene
Toluene
(ingestion
only)
2,4,5-Trichiorophenol
Vinyl
acetate
(ingestion
only)
Liver
Acenaphthene
Aldrin
(Res.
&
TIC
only)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(Res.&
TIC
only)
(ingestion
only)
Bromoform
Butyl
Benzyl
Phthalate
(ingestion
only)
Carbon
Tetrachloride
Liver
(continued)
Chlorobenzene
(ingestion
only)
Chlorodibromomethane
(ingestion
only)
Chloroform
2,4-D
DDT
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
(ingestion
only)
1
,2-Dichlorobenzene
(CW
only)
(ingestion
only)
1
,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1
,2-Dichloroethane
(inhalation
only)
1,1
-Dichloroethylene
trans-i
,2-Dichloroethylene
1
,2-Dichloropropane
(in estion
Dieldrin
(Res.
&
TIC
only)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl
phthalate
(ingestion
only)
p-Dioxane
Endrin
Ethylbenzene
(ingestion
only)
Fluoranthene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
alpha-HCH
(alpha-BHC)
gamma-HCH
(gamma-BHC)
RMX
Isophorone
(inhalation
only)
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
Methylene
Chloride
(ingestion
only)
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
(inhalation
only)
Picloram
Styrene
(ingestion
only)
Tetrachioroethylene
(ingestion
only)
Toxaphene
(CW
only)
Chlordane
2,4,5-TP
(Silvex)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Liver
(continued)
Reproductive
System
(continued)
1
,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
(inhalation
only)
Carbofuran
1,1,1
-Trichloroethane
(inhalation
only)
Carbon
disulfide
(ingestion
only)
1,1
,2-Trichloroethane
(ingestion
only)
2-Chlorophenol
2,4,5
-Trichlorophenol
1
,2-Dibromo-3
-chloropropane
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene
1
,2-Dibromoethane
(ingestion
only)
Vinyl
Chloride
Dicamba
Dinoseb
Mortality
Ethylbenzene
(inhalation
only)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
(ingestion
only)
Isophorone
(inhalation
only)
Xylenes
(Res.
&
IJC
only)
(ingestion
only)
Reproductive
System
(continued)
Nervous
System
Methoxychlor
Butanol
(ingestion
only)
RDX
Carbon
disulfide
(inhalation
only)
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Cyanide
Dieldrin
(CW only)
Respiratory
System
2,4-Dimethyiphenol
Antimony
(inhalation
only)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Benzoic
Acid
(inhalation
only)
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Beryllium
(inhalation
only)
Endrin
Cadmium
(inhalation
only)
Hexachloroethane
(inhalation
only)
(CW
only)
Chromium
(hex)
(inhalation
only)
Manganese
Cobalt
(inhalation
only)
Mercury
(inhalation
only)
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
(inhalation
only)
2-Methylphenol
(o-cresol)
trans-i
,2-Dichloroethylene
(inhalation
only)
Phenol
(inhalation
only)
1
,2-Dichloropropane
(inhalation
ojy1
Selenium
1 ,3-Dichloropropene
(cis
+
trans)(inhalation
only)
Styrene
(inhalation only)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
(inhalation
only
Tetrachloroethylene
(inhalation
only)
Methyl
bromide
(inhalation
only)
Toluene
(inhalation
only)
Naphthalene
(inhalation
only)
Trichloroethylene
Nickel
(inhalation
only)
Xylenes
(CW
only)
(ingestion
only)
Vinyl
acetate
(inhalation
only)
Xylenes
(inhalation
only)
Skin
Reproductive
System
Arsenic
(ingestion
only)
Arsenic
(inhalation
only)
Polychlorinated
biphenyls
(PCBs)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
(CW
only)
(ingestion
only)
Selenium
Boron
Silver
2-Butanone
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Spleen
1,3 -Dinotrobenzene
1,3 ,5-Trinitrobenzene
Notes:
Res.
= Residential
receptor
TIC
= Industrial
Commercial receptor
CW
=
Construction
Worker
receptor
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill. Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX A:
General
Section
742.TABLE
F: Similar-Acting
Carcinogenic
Chemicals
Kidney
Bromodichioromethane
(Ingestion
only)
Chiorofomi (Ingestion
only)
1,2
Dibromo
3 chloropropane
(Ingestion
only)
2,4
Dinitrotoluene
2,6
Dinitrotoluene
Hexachlorobenzene
Liver
Aidrin
Bis(2
chloroethyl)ether
Bis(2
ethylhexyl)phthalate
(Ingestion
only)
Carbazole
Carbon
tetracl””
Chlordane
Chlorofc
/T
DDD
DDE
DDT
1,2 Dib
I
‘
T
romo
3 chioropropane
(Ingestion
only)
i ,
i)ibromoetflane(Ingestion
only)
3,3’ Dichlorobenzidine
1,2
Dichioroethane
1,2 Dichioropropane
(Ingestion
only)
1,3
Dichloropropylene
(Ingestion
only)
Dieldrin
A
2:6
Dinitrotoluene
Heptachior
Heptachlor
epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
alpha
HCH
a
I.T(TT IT
Methyl;ehlori&
N Nitrosodiphen
KT KT...1
.
r,m 9
.uane)
4
2
iiamine
Pentachiorophenol
Tetrachioroethylene
Trichioroethylene
2,4,6
Trichiorophenol
Toxaphene
Vinyl
chloride
(‘rriil
nfrrr
Srctm
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Benzene
2,4,6
Trichlhl
arnr
nr
fln’trnintpctinn1
qv’tpm
Benzo(aanthracene
(LL1LISJJ/
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
11
1
I
T
Bromoform
42
F”
I
‘) T’
only)
)
romo
3
chloropropane
(Ingestion
only)
iinromoethane
(Ingestion
only)
1,3
Dichloropropyiene
(Ingestion
only)
g
Arsenic
(Inhalation
only)
Beryllium
(Inhalation
only)
Cadmium
(Inhalation
only)
Chromium,
hexavalent
(Inhalation
only)
1,3
Dichloropropylene
(Inhalation
only)
Methylene chloride
(Inhalation
only)
N
Nitrosodi
n
“vlamine
Nickel
(Inhalation
only)
Vinyl
chloride
Nasal
Cavity
1,2
Dibromo
3
chloropropane
(Inhalation
only)
1-2
Dibromoethane
(Inhalation
only)
\T
propylamin
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Bladder
3,30
Dichlorobenzidine
1,3 Dichioropropylene
(Ingestion
only)
N Nitrosodiphenylamine
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AME1DMENTS
Bladder
Liver
(continued)
1
,3-Dichloropropene
(cis
+
trans)
(ingestion
only)
Chloroform
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
DDD
DDE
Circulatory
System
DDT
Benzene
1
,2-Dichloropropane
1
,2-Dibromoethane
Dieldrin
1
,2-Dichloroethane
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Pentachlorophenol
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
p-Dioxane
Heptachior
Gall
Bladder
Heptachior
epoxide
p-Dioxane
(inhalation
only)
Hexachlorobenzene
alpha-HCH
(alpha—BHC’)
Gastrointestinal System
gamma-HCH
(gamma-BHC)
Benzo(a)anthracene
(ingestion
only)
Methylene
Chloride
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
(ingestion
only)
n-Nitrosodiphenylamine
(inhalation
only)
Benzo(k)flouranthene
(ingestion
only)
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Benzo(apene (ingestion
only)
Pentachlorophenol
Bromoform
Polychiorinated
biphenyls
(PCBs)
Chrysene
(ingestion
only)
Tetrachloroethylene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
(ingestion
only)
Toxaphene
1
,2-Dibromoethane
(ingestion
only)
Trichloroethylene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
(ingestion
only)
Vinyl
Chloride
(I/C
&
CW)
Vinyl
Chloride
(Res.)
Kidney
Bromodichioromethane
(ingestion
only)
Mammary
Gland
Chloroform
(ingestion
only)
3,3
‘-Dichlorobenzidine
1
,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
(ingestion
only)
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Liver
Aldrin
Respiratory
System
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
Arsenic
(inhalation
only)
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Benzo(a)anthracene
(inhalation
only)
Carbazole
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
(inhalation
only)
Carbon
Tetrachloride
Benzo(k)flouranthene
(inhalation
only)
Chiordane
Benzo(a)pyrene
(inhalation
only)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Respiratory
System (continued)
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
(hexavalent
ion)
Chrysene
(inhalation
only)
Cobalt
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
(inhalation
only)
1
,2-Dibromo-3
-chioropropane
(inhalation
only)
1
,2-Dibromoethane
(inhalation
only)
p-Dioxane (inhalation
only)
Trichloroethylene
Notes:
Res.
=
Residential
receptor
I/C
=
Industrial Commercial
receptor
CW
=
Construction
Worker
receptor
(Source: Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
A
General
Section
742.TABLE
I
Chemicals
Whose
Tier
1
Class
I
Groundwater
Remediation
Objective
Exceeds
the
1
in 1,000,000
Cancer
Risk
Concentration
Chemical
Class
I
Groundwater
1 in
1,000,000
Cancer
ADL
Remediation
Objective
Risk
Concentration
(mg/L)
(mgIL)
(mg/L)
Aidrin
0.014
0.000005
0.014
Benzo(a)anthracene
0.00013
0.00012
0.00013
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.0002
0.000012
0.00023
Benzo’b)fluoranthene
0.00018
0.00012
0.00018
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
0.01
0.000077
0.01
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
0.006
0.0061
0.0027
(Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate)
Carbazole
0.0043
0.0043
NA
Carbon
Tetrachloride
0.005
0.00066
0.000
1
Chlordane
0.002
0.000066
0.00014
NA
DDD
0.014
0.00023
0.014
DDE
0.01
0.00023
0.01
DDT
0.006
0.00023
0.006
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
0.0003
0.000012
0.0003
1
,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
0.0002
0.000061
0.001
1,2-Dibromoethane
0.00005
0.00002
0.001
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
0.02
0.00019
0.02
1
,2-Dichloroethane
0.005
0.00094
0.0003
1,2-Dichioropropane
0.005
0.0024
0.00006
1,3-Dichioropropene
0.001
0.00085
0.001
Dieldrin
0.009
0.0000053
0.009
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
0.00031
0.0001
0.00031
Heptachior
0.0004
0.000019
0.013
Heptachior
epoxide
0.0002
0.0000094
0.015
Hexachlorobenzene
0.00006
0.000053
0.00006
Alpha-HCH
0.00011
0.000014
0.000111
Gamma-HCH
(gamnia-BHC)
0.0002
0.000066
0.014
Tetrachloroethylene
0.005
0.0016
0.0004
Toxaphene
0.003
0.000077
0.00086
NA
Vinyl
chloride
(Non-residential)
0.002
0.00012
0.0002
Vinyl
chloride
(Residential)
0.002
0.000045
0.000057
0.0002
Ionizable
Organics
Inorganics
Arsenic
0.000057
0.001
N-Nitrosodi-n-nropylamine
Pentachiorophenol
2,4,6-Trichiorophenol
0.00 18
0.001
0.01
0.000012
0.00071
0.007
0.00
18
0.000076
0.01
(Source: Appendix
A,
Table
I renumbered
from
Appendix
A,
Table
H and
amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
0
0
CD
00
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
C
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4
Q
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
I
I
o
u
ON
I
I
L’J
—
D
tJ
t’J
i
ON
4U)4
I
I
I
,_
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
‘‘
4
i
00
i
I
i
i
(
00
i
00
C
00
i
C
()
t’J
4
i
.•
ON
c
L’J
‘J
—.
4
p—.
-
I
I
I
,
0
00
Dc
00
S
CDO—i
OCD-OOo’
---
CD
000
CD
CD
00
I
Q
00
-..0
0
—
CD00
CD
CD
CD
0
q
CD
‘
CD
CD0
CD
-
CD
CD
CDCD
CD
CD
‘.
CD
CD
CD
C)
CD
CD
CD
+
CD
CD
q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
C,,
CD
C)
-4.
0
t’J
H
1’
C
H
C)
C
C
C
C,,
H
00
C
H
I
C
riD
H
C
H
C
tT
C
Tj
C
C
LtD
eli
H
In
C
H
I
C
I?)
H
C
C)
CD
ci
CD
ci
CD
qQ
CD
CD
C)
CD
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.
APPENDIX
A:
Tier
1 Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.
TABLE
K:
Soil
Vapor
Saturation
Limits
(C
t
)
for
Volatile
Chemicals
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
çsa
t
(mg/rn
3
)
67-64-1
Acetone
7.50E+05
71-43-2
Benzene
4.20E+05
111-44-4
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
1 .20E+04
75-27-4
Brornodichioromethane
4.50E+05
75-25-2
Bromoform
7.80E+04
7
1-36-3
Butanol
2.90E+04
78-93-3
2-Butanone
(MEK)
3.80E+05
75-15-0
Carbon
disulfide
1.50E+06
56-23
-5
Carbon
tetrachloride
1
.00E+06
1
08-90-7
Chlorobenzene
7.40E+04
124-48-1
Chlorodibromornethane
5
.70E+04
67-66-3
Chloroform
1
.30E+06
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
(ionizable
organic)
1
.70E+04
75-99-0
Dalapon
1 .50E+03
96-12-8
1 ,2-Dibromo-3 -chloropropane
7. 80E+03
106-93-4
1 ,2-Dibrornoethane
1 .40E+05
95-50-1
l,2-Dichlorobenzene
1
.1OE+04
106-46-7
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
8
.40E+03
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane
3 .30E+07
75-34-3
1,1-Dichloroethane
1
.30E+06
107-06-2
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
4.40E+05
75-35-4
1,1
-Dichloroethylene
3 .30E+06
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
çsa
t
(mg/rn
3
)
156-59-2
cis-
1
,2-Dichloroethylene
1.1
OE+06
156-60-5
trans-i
,2-Dichloroethylene
1. 80E+06
78-87-5
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
3 .20E+05
542-75-6
1,3
-Dichioropropylene
(cis
+ trans)
2.1 OE+05
123-91-1
p-Dioxane
1.90E+05
100-41-4
Ethylbenzene
5.90E+04
76-44-8
Heptachior
8.30E+00
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
2. 80E-0
1
77-47
-4
Hexachiorocyclopentadiene
9.1 OE+02
67-72-1
Hexachioroethane
2. 80E+03
78-59-i
Isophorone
3.40E+03
98-82-8
Isopropylbenzene
(Cumene)
3
.OOE+04
7439-97-6
Mercury
(elemental)
2.20E+01
74-83-9
Methyl
bromide
8.60E+06
1
63 4-04-4
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
1
.20E+06
75-09-2
Methylene
chloride
2.OOE+06
93-65-2
2-Methylnaphthalene
5.3 OE+02
1634-04-4
2-Methylphenol
(o-cresol)
i
. 80E+03
91-20-3
Naphthalene
6.20E+02
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
i.70E+03
621-64-7
n-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
9.50E+02
108-95-2
Phenol
1.50E+03
1336-36-3
Polychiorinated
biphenyls
PCBs)
9.OOE+00
100-42-5
Styrene
3.40E+04
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
csa
t
(mg/rn
3
)
127-18-4
Tetrach1oroethyleiç
l.80E+05
108-88-3
Toluene
l.40E+05
120-82-1
1
,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4.30E+03
71
-5
5-6
1,1,1
-Trichioroethane
8
.70E+05
79-00-5
1,1
,2-Trichloroethane
1
.70E+05
79-01-6
Trichioroethylene
5.3
OE+05
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
6.30E+06
108-05-4
Vinyl
acetate
4.30E+05
75-01-4
Vinyl
chloride
1.1OE+07
108-38-3
m-Xylene
5.20E+04
95-47-6
o-Xylene
4.1OE+04
106-42-3
p-Xylene
5.50E+04
1330-20-7
Xylenes
(total)
4.90E+04
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742. APPENDIX
A:
Tier
1 Illustrations
and Tables
Section
742.
TABLE
L: Soil
Saturation
Limits
(Cct)
for Volatile
Chemicals
for
the
Indoor
Inhalation
Exposure
Routea
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
sat(fflg/kg)
67-64-1
Acetone
1.OOE+05
7 1-43-2
Benzene
4.OOE+02
11 1-44-4
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
2.20E+03
75-27-4
Bromodichioromethane
1 .40E+03
75-25-2
Bromoform
8.80E+02
7 1-36-3
Butanol
8.30E+03
75-15-0
Carbon
disulfide
4.50E+02
78-93-3
2-Butanone
(MEK)
2.30E+04
56-23
-5
Carbon
tetrachioride
5.OOE+02
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
2.40E+02
124-48-1
Chlorodibromomethane
6.30E+02
67-66-3
Chloroform
1 .70E+03
95-57-8
2-Chiorophenol
(ionizable
organic)
4.90E+04
75-99-0
Dalapon
9.90E+O4b
96-12-8
1 ,2-Dibromo-3
-chloropropane
3.1 0E+02’
106-93-4
1 ,2-Dibromoethane
8.1 OE+02
95-50-1
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2.OOE+02
1 0 6-46-7
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
1 .30E+02
75-71-8
Dichiorodifluoromethane
4.90E+02
75-34-3
1,1 -Dichloroethane
9.70E+02
107-06-2
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 .20E+03
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
atLmWkg)
75-35-4
1, 1-Dichioroethylene
7.60E+02
1 56-59-2
cis-l
,2-Dichloroethylene
7.OOE+02
156-60-5
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
1
.60E+03
78-87-5
1
,2-Dichloropropane
5
:90E+02
542-75-6
1
,3-Dichloropropylene
(cis
+ trans)
6.OOE+02
123-91-1
p-Dioxane
l.OOE+05
100-41-4
Ethylbenzene
1 .30E+02
76-44-8
Heptachlor
1 .1OE+00
1
1 8-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
2.50E-0
1
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
4.40E+0
1
67-72-1
Hexachioroethane
1
.60E+02
78-59-1
Isophorone
1 .80E+03
98-82-8
Isopropylbenzene
(Cumene)
3
.70E+02
7439-97-6
Mercury
(elemental)
4.50E-01
74-83-9
Methyl
bromide
2.30E+03
1634-04-4
Methyl
tertiary-butyl ether
6.30E+03
75-09-2
Methylene
chloride
1
.80E+03
93-65-2
2-Methylnaphthalene
8
.20E+0
1
1634-04-4
2-Methylphenol
(o-cresol)
4.80E+03
91
-20-3
Naphthalene
3
.40E+0
1
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
3.80E+02
62
1-64-7
n-Nifrosodi-n-propylamine
1.30E+03
108-95-2
Phenol
1.20E+04
1336-36-3
Polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs)
NA
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
mg/kg)
100-42-5
Styrene
2.30E+02
127-18-4
Tetrachloroethylene
2.90E+02
108-88-3
Toluene
2.40E+02
120-82-1
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
9.80E+02
71-55-6
1.1,1
-Trichioroethane
5
.60E+02
79-00-5
1,1
.2-Trichioroethane
9.OOE+02
79-01-6
Trichioroethylene
5
.20E+02
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
9
.50E+02
108-05-4
Vinyl
acetate
2.20E+03
75-01-4
Vinyl
chloride
2.5E+03
108-38-3
m-Xylene
1.50E+00
9
5-47-6
o-Xylene
1 .40E+02
106-42-3
p-Xylene
1
.20E+02
1330-20-7
Xylenes
(total)
1.OOE+02b
The
Soil
Saturation
Limit
was
calculated
using
an
foc of 0.002
gIg
and a
system
temoerature
of
13°C.
The
Soil
Saturation
Limit
calculated
at 25°
C.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
*
*
*
2:
***
C
en
C)
C
C)
CO
C
C
C
H
en
C
C
C
C)
S.
en
C)
C
CO
>
.-
I
II
I
0
-s
C
I
H
C
C
I
CI,
H
0
H
z
C,,
z
0
o
Th
H
1J-
ou
-•
H
0
z
‘1)
Q
N
I
Si
N
C
C
CO
C-
C
C ‘-
C
0
‘0
C
0
0
C
0s
C.
I
C
I
I
en
C
C))
I
en
C)
C
CO
>
C)
C)
0)
riD
C)
C
C
C)
I-
en
C
C
N
00
C
N
Cl)
C
01)
C))
s-S
ItO
(ID
C,)
D)
o
.
—
_I
c0
C)
H
ID)
-d
0
C
C,)
.1-S
0
o
. .-
s-S
ID)
CS)
II)
H
c—I
c-
r
N
N
.—
o
0
e
.—
C)
C)
01)
01)
CID
C ,.—.
C) 00
.0
C
N
.0
C
C
C
C
N
00
I
.0
C
C
N
N
00
00
tO
00
00
C)
E
CO
C
z
CO
-
.
C
C)
C)
C)
..C
C)
C)
C.)
-
-o1
CI—
C
C)
CO
C)
C)
C)
CO
I
CO
..C
o
C
C
CO
C)
C
C
NN
N
CC
C
C)
C)
C)
C)
C
C)
C)
CO
I
I
C
C)
C
N
00
C
.
—
C
C-)
N
N
N
z:
C
N
N
N
C-)
N
-
N
C
C
—
I
r)
If
C)
C.)
C-)
oo
C-?
c
N
—
LI)
—
—
C
rn
e
N
—
d)
C)
—
N
Q
?
C
N
H
CI)
H
E
00
—
*
**
**
*
**
**
*
0
C,)
0)
00
0
C-
0)
CO
0
z
0
C
0)
00
—
0
0
Co
o
Ur
0
00
‘I)
.0
C
Co
C)
0
CO
Cl
C
00
Q
.
4
Co
Co
CO
00
N
I
.0
.0
—
Cl
Cl
o
-
o
-1’
H
.0
4
H
C
C
C
(-)
CI
H
0
z
‘0
00
0
0
CO
00
00
o
0
0
0
‘.0
C
C,
‘.0
00
.0
C
Cl
U)
0
00
Co
0)
0
CO
>
C.)
C.)
0)
00
0)
0
0
C)
C-
0
Co
0
0
C
C
r
C
C
‘.0
0
0
o
ci)
01)
o
.0
—
C)
.0
C
C
‘.0
.
l
.0
.0
CC
00
N
CI
Cl
0)
0)
ro
II)
N
ci)
0
0)0)
0
—
0)0)
O
0
CO
°
E°
0
a)
0)
•
E
C
-o
00
0
.
0
CO
-E
CC-)
C
0
0
00
00
$
0
c
ci)
-e
-
0
-=
..CO
CO
.0
L)
U
U
4Eu
0
0
CO
.
00
N
—
C
r.!.
.
,i
00
‘.0
“?
°?
N
-
C
‘(,
CI)
C
C
4
‘.
‘.0
N
C
C)
—
C
—
—
Cl
‘.0
N
c
crc
—
O
N
crc
Cl
N
CD
H
C
C
C
(-)
.1
H
0
z
H
F!
or
t
0
CI
CI
cJ
C
C
cii
00
***
**
*
C
C
**
CO
C
ci)
CO
00
CO
I
C)
CC)
ci)
o
0
c/)
CO
C
ci)
CO
0
CO
crc
Cl
C
‘I-
l
tj
-
cdl
ci)
ci)
CO
00
oI
Cl
C
i
N
C
H
1D
C
Q
i
CID
C
crc
C
-o
00
ct
N
C)
C
C
CO
0
CO
00
00
C
0
C ‘—s
0
0
0
cc
.0
C
C
00
C
.0
C
00
ci)
0
C/D
C-c
ci)
CO
C
CO
C.)
C.)
CO
crc
CO
C
0
CO
I
0
CI
CI
I
CO ,—
o
00
CO
00
N
.0
.0
C
.0
C
C
a
C
00
o
—
00
cc
-
.0
z
CO
C.)
CO
L)
CO
CO
0
C
0
C-)
CO
C)
CO
CO
CO
-‘
CO
CO
COCO
-
)
- .
CO
-
-
o.
0
0
O
-d
:
.c
Ci)
C
-
C-s,
—-
—,+
0
CO
CO
CO
C
CO
Cl
CO
CO
CO
N
CO
CO
-o
0
CO
Cl
Cl
rc
C?
cic
C
crc
c
C
N
-
C
r-
0?
N
N
C.0
C.0
—
%
C
crc
C
C?
crc
crc
00
0
c-
C
-
C
crc
L)
N
—
N
—
—
N
c
C
00
—
N
C
c1j
C
*
*1
*
*
*
*
*
0O
C
—
CO
CO
U)
a)
00
CO
0)
h
COa)
U)
o
0
C,)
a)
CO
U)
a)
CO
CO
>
*
c o
N
—
C
COO
-
C
C
CC
0
U-Cl
C
C
—
C
N
001
,
U)
U)
N
C
C
C
I
00
C
C
H
I
C/)
.1
C/)
H
F.I
C
H
z
C/)
z
C
o
Cm
©
(_)
H
C
z
C
I
C
CO
0
CO
p
I
i
0
C)
00
I
I
U)
0
C,)
U)
a)
CO
CO
C)
C)
C)
C,)
CO
0
a)
CO
U)
0
N
d
0-C
Ii
C
CO
0
00
C)
01)
C
.0
o
—
C
C
o
Ifl
.0
N
.0
C
C
00
N
.0
C
C
C)
C)
CO
CO
I)
C)
C)
E
--
CO
0
0
z
-
•C)
.
.E
.$
CO
•-:t
o
C.)
‘i
c-’f
C)
CO
CO
CO
CO.
C)
0
a)’
NI
01
CO
CO
0
•01
C)
C)
N
N
0
CO
C)
Cl)
Cl)
a)
.0
1
0
0)—
-
Cl)
CO
CO
-
-
,.C)
CO
CO
CO
•5i)
,
CO
CO
a
CO.
C)
a)N
CO:
rC
0
N
i
N
C
I
—
I
N
I
c
I
00
C
N
00
N
—
r
Z
C
t
—
0
fl
—
-
v-
-
—
N
00
0
N
N
C
N
r--
C;
I(;
LÀ
N
N
N
C
—
N
—
-
N
C
U
—
—
C
D
\CO
C
—
—
—
—
N
—
N
00
N
—
—
N
C
C
*
*
*
*1
*
*
*1
*
*
*
a)
a)
U)
a)
a)
a)
a)
-a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
-a)
—
a)
a)a)
U)
a)
o
a)
CID
a)
-a)
U)
a)
a)
CO
*
.I
i
U,
C,)
a)
00
C
C
II
I
-o
C
N
NI
‘/.,
o1
H
C1)
H
0
H
z
(ID
z
0
o
-Th
CL)
H
0
z
.0
‘at
N
C
a)
a)
a)
a)
—‘
,
00
o
-a)
a)
0
.0
,
0
“a
U)
a)
Cl)
U)
a)
a)
a)
C)
C)
a)
a)’
Cl)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
U)
a)
a)’
_D
C
U
‘I
I
-
a)
a)
00
a) 00
.0
C
N
.0
00
N
.0
C
C
r’)
00
cc
C
C
C
I
.0
C
C
00
N
.0
.0
C
CC
°
—
00
“a
ca
—
N
C,
a)
—..-
a)
Q
U
•a)
a)
i
a)
a)
a)
a)
N
a)
a)
a)
-a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
-a)
a)’
a)
U)
I-.
a)
-a)
‘
a) ,—
0;_
pta)
a)C)
>
‘g
a)
s-a)
.
13a)
C)
a)
-
t
a)E
..o$
a)a)
>
—
--
a)
a-,
>,
‘S
‘So
-s
-°-s
a)
a)
e.
C
Cl)
cc
N
00
‘at
00
-‘
00
N
N
Q
C
00
00
N
‘at
‘.0
U
c’
“a
N
‘.0
N
—
N
C
N
N
—
N
H
CID
(ID
H
C
H
z
(ID
z
C
o
-‘
H
o
c
H
C
z
H
C
C
C
H
C
z
H
U)
bI
00
<2
c’j
*
*
*
*
*
**
*
0)
C
0D
0)
00
0)
0)
CO
0
0)
0
0
C)
-0)
00
... 0
0)0)
0)
$0
o
0
00
0)
-0)
Co
0)
C
CO
.I
-
0)
(1)
CO
00
N
N
-o
N
0
N
H
ci)
0
0
ci)
H
C
H
z
ci)
z
C
C
H
H
C
z
0
.0
.0
0
Lf)
i
0)
0
CO
CO
‘‘
to
—
00)
0$
o
C
0
)0
.0
0
C”
I
00
c’
1j
0
0
0
N
0
C,)
0
00
C,)
0)
C
CO
>
C.)
C.)
C)
0)’
00
0)
C
0
0)
C
CO
0
0)’
0
0
00
0) -
0
b
0)
00
.0
C”
.0
0
0
0
00
N
.0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
C,”
.0
0
-ö
.0
0.)
0)
0.)
C
0)
0
0.)
‘0
.
2
-
.
t
.2
.2
C.)
c-4
>
>
0.)
0)
0)
>
2
0)
0)
0)
0
CO
0
Co
0.)
0)
0)
>-‘
0.)
0)
0.)
>‘
0)’
Ct
—
0)
0
.
0)
CO
0)
OL
—
0)
.C
‘0
o.
C
•5
2
o
..2
0
.
2
-o
CO
0
._
0.)
CC)
NN
Q
0
0)
Ct:.
$
N
N
‘
C’.)
C’.)
z
00.)
r
o
C-
9
r
C.)
0
—
m
N
Ce.)
00
00
0’)
C)
“
——
o
—
o0
0’)
9
N
—
0
o
C
Cr,
—
0
—
C’.)
Q
C(’)
—
C-0.
—
0’)
00
°?
00
rjD
H
CID
C
C
C
H
0
z
H
C,)
*
*
*******
*
*
0
LI)
$0
o
0
C,)
0
CI)
0
0
*
HH
LI)
O
E
.c
——
Cl)
U)
C
d
Co
C
H
Cl)
0
C
Cl)
H
LI,
N
C
C
0
0
o
0
0
0
N
C
N
(H
C
N
(H
Cl)
0
riD
C
Co
C)
0
>
C)
C)
0)
CI)
Os
0
0
0)
C
0
Cl)
0
0
C
C
0
0
0)
bO
N
(H
.0
C
C
C
C
(H
.0
C
(H
CI
I
.0
CI
Cl
ill
.0
C
C
‘.0
.0
C
C
N
.0
C
C
C
LI,
C
.o
C
C
C
C
(H
0
0)
>
I-.
0
•0
0
I-.
U
$
0
C)
CO
U
0
I)
CO
0)
0
0
E
0
0
C
U
CO
0
•0
2
E
0
I
0
U
CO
0
0
U
I
C)
0
U
0)
0
CO
0
C)
2
CO
C)
0
U
cC)
C-
0
0
2
0
CAD
0)
0
‘.0
—
C
.
rC)
-
-r
0
C
C
N
00
(H
00
C
—
(H
z
V
riD
C
00
C
‘.0
t
C
C
—
(H
c
1
)
00
C
C
00
cC
‘.
‘Cc
‘.0
00
t
CO
N
N
U
N
—
N
—
—
N
N
Cfl
N
—
N
N
c’i
o
—
—
——
—
0
CI)
H
I
P_zzzzz
°:
°
z
—
— ——
— —
— ——
— —
—
Z
-
E
E
-
—
0
l)
0
0
L)
Z
Z
C,)
C/)
Cl)
Cl)
H
0
•
0
N
9
C-
00
fl
0
N
9
1-
C
r--
‘?
L0
00
9
C
c-
c
N
00
Z
9
9
t--
r-
-
9
C
C’
C,)
0
C
0
C-
0
000
—
r’
N
N
C1
00
t
00
C)
t
NN
N
N
t
N
—
—
N
N
N
N
N
—
N
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
Vl-uea
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
Ingestion
Outdoor
Inhalation
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
7440-62-2
j
Vanadium
550b
C
]
0.O49
0.lmt
*
7440-66-6
]
Zinc’
23,000
24000b
lOmt
*
“*“
indicates
that
the
ADL
is
less
than
or
equal
to
the
specified
remediation
objective.
NA
means
not
available;
no
PQL
or
EQL
available
in
USEPA
analytical
methods.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Chemical
Name
and
Soil
Remediation
Objective
Notations
Soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
human
health
criteria
only.
Calculated
values
correspond
to
a
target
hazard
quotient
of
1.
No
toxicity
criteria
available
for
the
route
of
exposure.
IC’
a
b
C
d
non
saturation
concentration
.
,,-‘-the
concentration
at
which
the
absorptive
limits
of
the
soil
particles,
the
solubility
limits
of
the
available
soil
moisture,
and
saturation
of
soil
pore
air
ha’.’e
been
reached.
Above
the
soil
saturation
concentration,
the
assumptions
regarding
vapor
transport
to
air
and1or
dissolved
phase
transport
to
groundwater
(for
chemicals
which
are
liquid
at
ambient
soil
temperatures)
have
been
violated,
and
alternative
modeling
approaches
are
required.
Calculated
Tier
I
remediation
objective
exceeds
ihc
value
of
the
chemical
in
soil.
Therefore,
the
C,
of
the
chemical
is
shown.
Calculated
values
correspond
to
a
cancer
risk
level
of
1
in
1,000,000.
See
Appendix
B,
Table
G
for
soil
and
soil
gas
remediation
objectives
for
residential
properties
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
g
Chemical-specific
properties
are
such
that
this
route
is
not
of
concern
at
any
soil
contaminant
concentration.
h
40
CFR
761
contains
applicability
requirements
and
methodologies
for
the
development
of
PCB
remediation
objectives.
Requests
for
approval
of
a
Tier
3
evaluation
must
•
address
the
applicability
of
40
CFR
761.
‘
Soil
remediation
objective
for
pH
of
6.8.
If
soil
pH
is
other
than
6.8,
refer
to
Appendix
B,
Tables
C
and
D
of
this
Part.
Ingestion
soil
remediation
objective
adjusted
by
a
factor
of
0.5
to
account
for
dermal
route.
k
A
preliminary
remediation
goal
of
400
mg/kg
has
been
set
for
lead
based
on
Revised
Interim
Soil
Lead
Guidance
for
C’ERC’LA
Sites
and
RCRA
C’orrective
Action
Facilities,
OSWER
Directive
#9355.4-12.
Potential
for
soil-plant-human
exposure.
The
person
conducting
the
remediation
has
the
option
to
use:
1)
TCLP
or
SPLP
test
results
to
compare
with
the
remediation
objectives
listed
in
this
Table;
2)
where
applicable,
the
total
amount
of
contaminant
in
the
soil
sample
results
to
compare
with
pH
specific
remediation
objectives
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
C
or
D
of
this
Part
(see
Section
742.510);
or
3)
the
appropriate
background
value
listed
in
Appendix
A,
Table
G.
If
the
person
conducting
the
remediation
wishes
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
background
concentrations,
this
should
be
done
in
accordance
with
Subpart
D
of
this
Part.
“
The
Agency
reserves
the
right
to
evaluate
the
potential
for
remaining
contaminant
concentrations
to
pose
significant
threats
to
crops,
livestock,
or
wildlife.
°
For
agricheniical
facilities,
remediation
objectives
for
surficial
soils
which
are
based
on
field
application
rates
may
be
more
appropriate
for
currently
registered
pesticides.
Consult
the
Agency
for
further
information.
For
agrichemical
facilities,
soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
site-specific
background
concentrations
of
Nitrate
as
N
maybe
more
appropriate.
Such
determinations
shall
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
procedures
set
forth
in
Subparts
D
and
I
of
this
Part.
q
The
TCLP
extraction
must
be
done
using
water
at
a
pH
of
7.0.
Value
based
on
dietary
Reference
Dose.
Value
based
on
the
Groundwater
Quality
Standard
for
this
chemical
pursuant
to
35
Ill.
Adrn.
Code
620.
‘
Value
for
Ingestion
based
on
Reference
Dose
for
Mercuric
chloride
(CAS
No.
7487-94-7);
value
for
Inhalation
based
on
Reference
Concentration
for
elemental
Mercury
(CAS
No.
743
9-97-6).
Inhalation
remediation
objective
only
applies
at
sites
where
elemental
mercury
is
a
contaminant
of
concern.
For
the
ingestion
route
for
arsenic,
see
742.Appendix
A,
Table
G.
U
Value
based
on
Reference
Dose
for
Thallium
sulfate
(CAS
No.
7446-1
8-6).
V
Value
based
on
Reference
Dose
adjusted
for
dietary
intake.
V
For
sites
located
in
any
populated
area
as
defined
in
Section
742.200,
Appendix
A,
Table
H
may
be
used.
U
The
remediation
objectives
for
these
chemicals
must
also
include
the
construction
worker
inhalation
objective
in
Appendix
B,
Table
B.
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Values
for
total
Chromium
based
on
toxicity
data
for
hexavalent
Chromium.
Values
based
on
maximum
contaminant
level.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
B
Tier
1
Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.Table
B
Tier
1
Soil
Remediation
Objectivesa
for
Industrial/Commercial
Propertiesa
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
Values
Industrial!
-
Construction
Commercial
Worker
CAS
No.
Chemical
Ingestion
Outdoor
Ingestion
Outdoor
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
Name
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
83-32-9
Acenaphthene
[
120,000”
-[
120000
b
.....°
57J’
nor
oo
*
67-64-1
]
Acetone
[
100000
d
[
g
6l0000
100000d
25’
25
[
*
I
15972-
1
Alachlor°
72e
1,600e
004
O16
04
1.3
NA
[60-8
[
116-06-3
]
Aldicarb°
2,000b
]
0,044
O.014r
0,07
0.068r
NA
309-00-2
1
Aldrin
04
ow
}
b
73e
94
04
(J05
j
24
015
0.94
120-12-7
Anthracene
610
,000b
}
610000b
12,000”
2,lOOr]
59000
1
l,000
*
1912-24-
Atrazine°
72
,000b
j
oo
0.056r
1
NA
9
j
71-43-2
Benzene
looe
]
44
2,300e
2.2e
0,0
0.032r
J
047
*
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Constiuction
Worker
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
Values
Industrial!
-
Commercial
CAS
No.
Chemical
Ingestion
Outdoor
Ingestion
Outdoor
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
Name
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
56-55-3
Benzo(a)anthracene
8
78e
400’
170e
.e
2.lr
8
hf
*
205-99-2
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
[
8
—
180e
170e
—“
26ff
75r
]
2
38r
*
207-08-9
Benzo(k)fluroanthene
78e
e
l,700e
49
48r
aso
24ff
*
50-32-8
[Benzo(a)pyrene
8
f
c
17e
13ff
8
&3
8
*
111-44-4
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
5
4.7
•5
5
iff
°°°
0.66
0.00036e
0.00036
1
17-81-7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
410e
J
31,000
2ffJd
44b
891J0e
[
31,000
200’
60O
24
31,000
Qd
*
(Dichlorobromomethane)
92e
3O4
281J0d
2,000e
28ff0d
1J61z
*
[
75-27-4
Bromodichloromethane
[752s2
Bromoform
720e
1
0ff
1OOO
ftff
15ff
04
77Z
04
77Z
*
71-36-3
Butanol
200
,000b
10000d
200000b
10,000’s
17b
[
17
NA
78-93-3
2-Butanone
(MEK)
1,000,000
21
,000b
120000
b
4’
]]
85-68-7
Butyl
benzyl
phthalate
410
,000
b
10d
410000b
ijijjd
1cJJd
[
93p
1(yJ(Jd
*
[
86-74-8
Carbazole
290e
f
6,200e
[
je
[
24
NA
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
M4ue&
Industrial!
-
Construction
Commercial
Worker
CAS
No.
Chemical
Ingestion
Outdoor
Ingestion
1
Outdoor
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
Name
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
I
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
1563-66-2
Carbofuran°
10
,
000b
1000b
..c
Q4
047
NA
75-15-0
Carbon
disulfide
200000
b
720
gjd
20000b
b-
r
160
3JY
*
56-23-5
Carbon
tetrachloride
44e
]
G44
b
9fC
0-90
096e
0-07
0.071
}
033
035
*
57-74-9
Chiordane
16e
1
l0
je
pp
1jb
b
2Je
g
*
106-47-8
1
Chloroaniline
8,200b
820b
*
(p-Chloroaniline)
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
41
,000b
yjjb
I
çj
14000b
L
4
44
*
(Monochlorobenzene)
124-48-1
Chiorodibromomethane
41
,000b
41000b
0
ijb
0-4
041
*
(Dibromochioromethane)
67-66-3
Chloroform
940
je
0.76
e
}
()44r
[
*
95-57-8
2-Chlorophenol
10
,
000b
10000b
53,000
100000d
}
[
*
218-01-9
Chrysene
]
780e
L2
17,000e
]
160
1cor
[
g
cor
*
94-75-7
2,4-D°
20000b
.
2,000b
-
]
1•9r
[
*
*
**
*
*
*
*1
*
*
s
Ii
;
I i
‘ l
I I
(ft
I
I
I I
I
c
I
—
C’4
0:1
I
1
Z!ll2I
-
\
*1
!
H
riD
CI)
H
C
H
z
riD
z
C
o
Th
o
L)
H
C
z
0
rZ
(-)
)
)
0
c
$-
-
0
‘
C
C
N
H
C
)
-
Q
C
C
I
C
C
C
-o
‘5’
I)
)C
—
C—
—
N
COC
CO
CC
C
-
00
-o
0
—
..o
C
—Q
a
C’
,.
N
C
°?
C
C
C
00
C
C
C))
Cf
C
C
C
C’
C
C
<
?
‘?
-
N
V
Cf
C
cq
r-
C
C’I
C
C
C’
‘
C
N
N
N
Cfl
C’
—
00
—
C’
ILliNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
Values
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Industrial!
-
Commercial
Construction
Worker
CAS
No.
Chemical
Ingestion
Outdoor
Ingestion
Outdoor
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
Name
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
91-94-1
3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine
13e
280e
0-047
0023
00
QJ
1.3
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane
180000
b
[
43
2.2J1
*
200,000
T
T
200,000
1
75-34-3
1,1
-Dichloroethane
410
,000b
[
410000b
130b
2’
8r
44-0
40
*
107-06-2
1,2-Dichloroethane
63e
I
oo
o.’
I
I,400e
1
o-o
le
4
1J4
04
0.121
*
(Ethylene
dichloride)
[
[
75-35-4
1,l-Dichloroethylene
100
,000b
10000b
J55r
[
*
156-59-2
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
[
2o,o0o’
20000b
yjd
o-i.
onr
1—
121
*
156-60-5
Trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
41
,000b
344
0b
41000b
344
b
71
3.,4
33
*
78-87-S
1,2-Dichloropropane
84
160e
b
i.e
3r,yje
0-47
]
o.15r
*
542-75-6
1
,3-Dichloropropene
(l,3-Dichloropropylene,
4
l.8
1,200
0b
0-4
1J3
0,47
0.015
0.005
cis
+
Irans)
[71
[ldrinnl
0-4
4
7.8e
4
0-Q4
(J5
0,47
0.603
84-66-2
Diethyl
phthalate
1000000b
2000
I
000000b
[
*
rJ)
H
1.L
C
H
z
z
C
o
-Th
H
1-I
CL)
H
C
z
-
*
C
C1j
(
*
*
I
*
*
*
*
*
*
Ii
f
c:fj
--
0
i
CO
>
oI
000
0
0
0
-
0
0
-
j
,
NI
I
.-
tC)
I
-
- o
—
—
00
)-
0
C
0
.2CO
C’
-
-
CO
0))
—
N
—
—
—
.-
>.
—
N
0000
C-)
C
C.)
0
C) —
—
—
—
——
——
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
.I
.
.
C’
01
01
01
0
0
0
0
0
0
—I
‘ III
—
-U
- :
-
•D
0
A
H
CID
C)
C)
-
C
‘
.
C)
C)
C)1
C)
C)
CO
CO
.
-
N
CO
1
—
-a
CO
C)
C)
C)
0
—
N
-z.
-
C)
U
CO
:
:
0
CO
0
.CO
-
N
-
-
r,)
-
Q
0
0
f
—
N
?
N
N
C’
—
N
r
t
C’
0
4
4 -
d
0?
- 4
NO
CI)
—
—
N
00
0
N
N
C’
m
<
r-
t!.
l
r
r
U
C’
1)
N
C’
—
N
—
N
C’
C’
C-CO
C-CO
—
N
—
C-CO
—
—
—
—
N
—
N
00
N
C,)
H
CI)
C
0
0
H
C
z
J
-
9
*
**
*
*1
*
*
*
*
*
g,
-
_
i.
0I
•ctl
lb
00
0)-0)Z
0)0)O
-
i
I
--I
Il
—
CO
> oJ
0
II
-
g
.
-3
—
—
—
——
—
-
—
——
c0)
C
C
2
C)
-
-
r,
C
—J
-
0
0
.o
-
-—
-
0
0
0
j
0
0
0
r —
00
0
D
00
0
0
00
N
C
N
d
i
I
‘ ‘
I
‘ZZZi!ZL
C2u
-
-
4
1
C,)
H
C)
5’o
0)
C)
C)
C)
QC)
-e
0)
C)
C
C)
.$
C0
•
C
0)
d -
-
C)
‘:2
C)
C)
o
()
0
0
(_)
;-
0
0
-
C)
C)
Q_
—0)
CO
CO
><
><
0)
C)
0)
C)
C)
-
cb
0
0
C
0
0)
0)
-0)
0)
C)
0)
0
0
-0)
C—
C
0)
I
0
-0)
><
0
-0)
C)
0)0)
s-CO
C);—
e.
0
-
—
CrC
44
r
- ;
d
-
0
0
Cl)
N
00
0
N
Cl
C)
C
Cl
<
°?
N
Cr)
0
C)
0
—
—
00
N
N
Q
0))
00
r
°?
00
Cl
—
—
rC
V
N
C
Cl
—
N
C
N
N
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
IndustrialL
-
Construction
Exposure
Route
Val++es
Commercial
Worker
CAS
No.
Chemical
Ingestion
Outdoor
Ingestion
Outdoor
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
Name
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
I
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
I
1634-04-4
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
20
,000b
8yjd
20000b
110
pb
032
0.31r
04
0.31r
*
75-09-2
Methylene
chloride
rje
12000b
4e
b
o.o23
r
*
(Dichioromethane)
93-65-2
2-Methylnaphthalene
8,200b
j
8jb
......c
95r
*
95-48-7
T
2-Methylphenol
100
,000b
1
150000b
100000
b
tjij
[
b
*
.
(o
—
Cresol)
86-30-6
[
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
l,200e
25,000
4100e
j
..c
[
L
[
*
[621647
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
04
0.82
L.....e
1,900d
18c
1900d
[
00000
0.00005
0.000046e
J
0.000046
0.0018
91-20-3
Naphthalene
41
,000b
g
0b
14b
34r
44
53
*
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
.7gb
44b
jjr
4
0.26
108-95-2
Phenol
[
610,000”
54000b
[
61000”
e
1100b
b
100
tr
1918-02-I
Picloram°
140,000”
2
]
20t
NA
1336-36-3
Polychlorinated
biphenyls
.h
1”
......h
*
(PCBs)
129-00-0
Pyrene
[
61,000”
..
[
61000b
f
400”
530
21,000
7(iQf
-
*
ci)
H
C
z
ci)
C
••:
-‘
CL)
H
C
z
H
ci)
-
**
**
*
*
**
*
<_
h
9
(ft
C/)C)
C)-
0
.0
—
—
—
C
C
C
..
—
ill
> 0I-
-
I
0
.0
.0
.0
o•_
0
c
r,
.0
.0
j
I
r-
C
0
0
0
!
i
-
0
0
—
r’)
r’)
0
0
0
0
‘
-
UUUUUHUUH
U
I
C
-c
C
I
C
I
C
C)I
.2
0
—
C
0
—.‘
C)
C
01
C)
-
C)
—
0)
-
-
-I
.01
:I
•
C)
.
C
•5
-
s
0
0
C.)
-
Cl)
C)
—
E
CO -
2
—
: -
‘©j
-
-
-ç
0 •
N
C—C
C;C
0
.E
$
< - .
c’I
>-
0
r-.
cf
o
N
.
N
ct
-
Cfl
C
C
Ci
—
r
C’C
ob
N
9
Ct)
00
00
Ct
<
?
o
o9o
C)
—
C
Ct)
C
CrC
C
C’)
C,)
—
00
C)
—
—
N
—
C)
—
—
—
CrC
00
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
Vakies
Industrial!
-
Construction
Commercial
Worker
CAS
No.
Chemical
Ingestion
Outdoor
Ingestion
Outdoor
Class
I
Class
II
ADL
Name
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
(mg/kg)
Inhalation
I
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
93-65-2
[
MCPP
(Mecoprop)
......c
0033r
j
0.066
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
24
5Q
5cyJe.J
C
o11’
44
057’
*
93
72
1
2,,5
TP
16000b
1
.15600
(Silvex)
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
200
,000b
]
200000b
4_4
2200’
*
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
520e
j
390
820e
ll,000C
54
(J
4
1.6’
0.66
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
Inorganics
7440-36-0
Antimony
7440-38-2
Arsenic1’
7440-39-3
Barium
7440-41-7
]
Beryllium
7440-42-8
Boron
7440-43-9
Cadmium”
7440-70-2
Calcium
16887-00-6
Chloride
[40473
Chromium,
total
16065-83-1
Chromium,
ion,
trivalent
[540299
f
Chromium,
ion,
hexavalent
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
Industrial!
-
Construction
Commercial
Worker
Values
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Exposure
Route
Va1ue
Cl)
H
C
H
z
Cl)
z
C
o
-Th
CL)
H
C
z
*
*
**
*
*
*
**
*
*
1)
()
00)
—
—0
0
—
—
—
Q
0
0
()b
:-
0-
00
0)
iu
•
•
0
CO
O
>
0
.0
.0
.0
0
01
0
0
0
0
0
!
H
I
II
c
;
—
I
-
—
H
CI)
CO
I
C)
0
C)
.±
CO
0
0
00
U
U
0
0
C-
0.
0
E
.
z
C/)
0)
>
CO
C
—
0)
00
CO
C)
0
0
00
z:
00
•C:t-
00
0
Cfl
—
-Ct-
—
•-
C/
0
N
(4
0
C
0)
r
?
.O
0
0
—
C
CC
0
C
L)
00
Ct
CC
C’)
C’)
C’)
N
t t N
N
CrC
r
t
-
N
N
CrC
N
—
N
NN
NN
—
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
14797-73-0
Perchiorate
7723-14-0
Phosphorus
7440-09-7
Potassium
7782-49-2
Selenium”
7440-22-4
Silver
7440-23
-5
Sodium
14808-79-8
Sulfate
7440-28-0
Thallium
7440-62-2
Vanadium
7440-66-6
Zinc’
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Exposure
Route-Specific
Values
for
Soils
“*“
indicates
that
the
ADL
is
less
than
or
equal
to
the
specified
remediation
objective.
NA
means
Not
Available;
no
PQL
or
EQL
available
in
USEPA
analytical
methods.
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Chemical
Name
and
Soil
Remediation
Objective
Notations
(2d,
5th
thru
8th
Columns)
Soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
human
health
criteria
only.
Calculated
values
correspond
to
a
target
hazard
quotient
of
1.
No
toxicity
criteria
available
for
this
route
of
exposure.
b
d
Soil
saturation
concentration
(C)
—
the
concentration
at
which
the
absorptive
limits
of
the
soil
particles,
the
solubility
limits
of
the
available
soil
moisture,
and
saturation-of
soil
pore
air
have
been
reached.
Above
the
soil
saturation
concentration,
the
assumptions
regarding
vapor
transport
to
air
andior
dissolved
phase
transport
to
groundwater
(for
chemicals
which
are
liquid
at
ambient
soil
temperatures)
have
been
violated,
and
alternative
modeling
approaches
are
required.
Calculated
Tier
I
remediation
objective
exceeds
value
of
the
chemical
in
soil.
Therefore,
the
C,
of
the
chemical
is
shown.
Calculated
values
correspond
to
a
cancer
risk
level
of
1
in
1,000,000.
See
Appendix
B,
Table
G
for
soil
remediation
objectives
for
industrial/commercial
properties
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
g
Chemical-specific
properties
are
such
that
this
route
is
not
of
concern
at
any
soil
contaminant
concentration.
h
40
CFR
761
contains
applicability
requirements
and
methodologies
for
the
development
of
PCB
remediation
objectives.
Requests
for
approval
of
a
Tier
3
evaluation
must
•
address
the
applicability
of
40
CFR
761.
Soil
remediation
objective
for
pH
of
6.8.
If
soil
pH
is
other
than
6.8,
refer
to
Appendix
B,
Tables
C
and
D
in
this
Part.
Ingestion
soil
remediation
objective
adjusted
by
a
factor
of
0.5
to
account
for
dermal
route.
See
Appendix
B,
Table
G
for
soil
gas
remediation
objectives
for
industrial/commercial
properties
for
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route..
Potential
for
soil-plant-human
exposure.
m
The
person
conducting
the
remediation
has
the
option
to
use:
(1)
TCLP
or
SPLP
test
results
to
compare
with
the
remediation
objectives
listed
in
this
Table;
(2)
the
total
amount
of
contaminant
in
the
soil
sample
results
to
compare
with
pH
specific
remediation
objectives
listed
in
Appendix
B,
Table
C
or
D
of
this
Part
(see
Section
742.510);
or
(3)
the
appropriate
background
value
listed
in
Appendix
A,
Table
G.
If
the
person
conducting
the
remediation
wishes
to
calculate
soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
background
concentrations,
this
should
be
done
in
accordance
with
Subpart
D
of
this
Part.
“
The
Agency
reserves
the
right
to
evaluate
the
potential
for
remaining
contaminant
concentrations
to
pose
significant
threats
to
crops,
livestock,
or
wildlife.
°
For
agrichemical
facilities,
remediation
objectives
for
surficial
soils
which
are
based
on
field
application
rates
may
be
more
appropriate
for
currently
registered
pesticides.
Consult
the
Agency
for
further
information.
“
For
agrichemical
facilities,
soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
site-specific
background
concentrations
of
Nitrate
as
N
may
be
more
appropriate.
Such
determinations
shall
be
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
procedures
set
forth
in
Subparts
D
and
I
of
this
Part.
q
The
TCLP
extraction
must
be
done
using
water
at
a
pH
of
7.0.
r
\ralue
based
on
dietary
Reference
Dose.
Value
based
on
the
Groundwater
quality
Standard
for
this
chemical
pursuant
to
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.
S
Value
for
Ingestion
based
on
Reference
Dose
for
Mercuric
chloride
(CAS
No.
7487-94-7);
value
for
Inhalation
based
on
Reference
Concentration
for
elemental
Mercury
(CAS
No.
743
9-97-6).
Inhalation
remediation
objective
only
applies
at
sites
where
elemental
mercury
is
a
contaminant
of
concern.
For
the
ingestion
route
for
arsenic
for
industrial/commercial,
see
742.Appendix
A,
Table
G.
U
Value
based
on
Reference
Dose
for
Thallium
sulfate
(CAS
No.
7446-1
8-6).
W
Value
based
on
Reference
Dose
adjusted
for
dietary
intake.
*
n
For
any
populated
areas
as
defined
in
Section
742.200,
Appendix
A,
Table
H
may
be
used.
Value
based
on
maintaining
fetal
blood
lead
below
10
ug/dl,
using
the
USEPA
adults
Blood
Lead
Model.
Values
for
total
Chromium
based
on
toxicity
data
for
hexavalent
Chromium.
z
Values
based
on
a
maximum
contaminant
level.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
B
Tier
1
Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.Table
C
pH
Specific
Soil
Remediation
Objectives
for
Inorganics
and
Ionizing
Organics
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Route
(Class
I
Groundwater)
Chemical
(totals)
pH
4.5
to
pH
4.75
pH
5.25
pH
5.75
pH
6.25
pH
6.65
pH
6.9
pH
7.25
pH
7.75
pH
8.25
pH
8.75
(mg/kg)
4.74
to
5.24
to
5.74
to
6.24
to
6.64
to
6.89
to
7.24
to
7.74
to
8.24
to
8.74
to
9.0
Inorganics
Antimony
55
5
55555555
Arsenic
25
25.2
25.4
25.6
295.8
295.8
296
1462
26.4
36.6
Barium
260
490
850
1,200
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
2,100
a
Beryllium
1.1
2.1
3.4
6.6
22
63
140
1,000
8,000
a
Cadmium
1.0
1.7
2.7
3.7
5.2
7.5
11
59
430
a
Chromium
(+6)
70
62
54
46
40
38
36
32
28
24
21
Copper
330
580
2,100
11,000
59,000
130,000
200,000
330,000
330,000
aa
Cyanide
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Lead
23
23
23
23
107
107
107
107
107
107
282k
Mercury
0.01
0.01’
0.03
0.15
0.89
2.1
3.3
6.4
8.0
a
a
Nickel
20
36
56
76
100
130
180
700
3,800
a
Selenium
24
17
12
8.8
6.3
5.2
4.5
3.3
2.4
1.8
1.3
Silver
0.24
0.33
0.62
1.5
4.4
8.5
13
39
110
a
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Chemical
(totals)
pH
4.5
to
4.75
pH
5.25
pH
5.75
pH
6.25
pH
6.65
pH
6.9
pH
7.25
pH
7.75
pH
8.25
pH
8.75
(mg/kg)
4.74
to
5.24
to
5.74
to
6.24
to
6.64
to
6.89
to
7.24
to
7.74
to
8.24
to
8.74
to
9.0
Thallium
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
3.4
3.8
4.4
4.9
Vanadium
980
980
980
980
980
980
980
980
980
980
980
Zinc
1,000
1,800
2,600
3,600
5,100
6,200
7,500
16,000
53,000
a
Organics
BenzoicAcid
440140
420120
4-1-0120
400110
400110
4.00110
400110
400110
400110
400110
400110
2-.Chlorophenol
4-.0L3
40j
4Gj.
40L3
=6t
2211
2,4-Dichiorophenol
1-036
1-03
1-03.6
4-05
10
4-011
4011
04611
o6911
04611
04807
Dinoseb
40.72
440.39
1410.
18
0420.093
043.0.06
1
0440.054
0440.051
0,2-70.048
0460.046
0460.046
0450.046
MCPP
(Mecoprop)
Q4I
Q934
QQ
2J
Pentachiorophenol
04411
034L4
0A4Q
007ZZ
004Qj
000.l2
002
002
002(L085
02Q4
2,4,5
TP
(Silvex)
26
1-6
4-2
44
44
14
-14
44
44
14
44
2,4,5-
400740
3.90740
3.90720
4-70670
340550
2-70440
270360
4-70180
6485
3446
2433
Trichiorophenol
2,4,6-
04-71.3
0461.2
0441
0290.73
0200.43
0450.31
0430.26
0,090.19
0,070.17
0,070.16
0070.16
Trichiorophenol
a
No
data
available
for
this
pH
range.
b
For
Lead,
this
value
maybe
used
up
to
a
pH
of
11.0.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
B
Tier
1
Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.Table
D
pH
Specific
Soil
Remediation
Objectives
for
Inorganics
and
Ionizing
Organics
for
the
Soil
Component
of
the
Groundwater
Ingestion
Route
(Class
II
Groundwater)
Chemical
(totals)
pH
4.5
to
pH
4.75
pH
5.25
pH
5.75
pH
6.25
pH
6.65
pH
6.9
pH
7.25
pH
7.75
pH
8.25
pH
8.75
(mg/kg)
4.74
to
5.24
to
5.74
to
6.24
to
6.64
to
6.89
to
7.24
to
7.74
to
8.24
to
8.74
to
9.0
Inorganics
Antimony
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
Arsenic
100
100
100
110
110
120
120
120
120
130
130
Barium
260
490
850
1,200
1,500
1,600
1,700
1,800
2,100
a
Beryllium
140
260
420
820
2,800
7,900
17,000
130,000
1,000,000
a
Cadmium
10
17
27
37
52
75
110
590
4,300
a
a
Chromium
(+6)
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
No
Data
Copper
330
580
2,100
11,000
59,000
130,000
200,000
330,000
330,000
a
a
Cyanide
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
Lead
300
300
300
300
1,420
1,420
1,420
1,420
1,420
1,420
3,RIOk
Mercury
0.05
0.06
0.14
0.75
4.4
10
16
32
40
a
a
Nickel
400
730
1,100
1,500
2,000
2,600
3,500
14,000
76,000
a
a
Selenium
24
17
12
8.8
6.3
5.2
4.5
3.3
2.4
1.8
1.3
Thallium
16
18
20
24
26
28
30
34
38
44
49
Zinc
2,000
3,600
5,200
7,200
10,000
12,000
15,000
32,000
110,000
a
ILLTh1OIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Chemical
(totals)
pH
4.5
pH
4.75
pH
5.25
pH
5.75
pH
6.25
pH
6.65
pH
6.9
pH
7.25
pH
7.75
pH
8.25
pH
8.75
(mg/kg)
to
4.74
to
5.24
to
5.74
to
6.24
to
6.64
to
6.89
to
7.24
to
7.74
to
8.24
to
8.74
to
9.0
Organics
BenzoicAcid
440140
420120
44-0120
400110
400110
400110
400110
400110
400110
400110
400110
2-Chiorophenol
20L.
20L
2GL
20L
20I
20L
4-9L.
2411
2,4-Dichiorophenol
1-018
4-0
4-0
4-0j
1-0
4-7
4-0
086
0.699.
05611
04g07
Dinoseb
47.2
443.9
Wl.8
20.93
440.61
340.54
340.51
240.48
340.46
340.46
340.46
MCPP
(Mecoprop’)
023
0.19
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
Pentachiorophenol
24i
1-47
0-3!
034L4
048Q1
0-l-507
042
049A
04-G9A
04(4Q4
00cL4
2,4,5
TP
(Silvex)
4-30
20
62
5-7
55
55
54
54
54
54
54
2,45-
2-0003700
2-0003700
1—9003600
4-8003400
1-002800
4-4002200
4-2001800
640910
64420
3646
2433
Trichiorophenol
2,4,6-
1-06.4
1--86
-l-75.l
1-43.6
-h02.l
0471.6
0441.3
0090.97
0070.85
0070.81
0070.8
Trichlorophenol
a
No
data available
for
this
pH
range.
b
For
Lead,
this
value
may
be
used
up
to
a
pH
of
11.0.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
-
Lt
—
00
00
--
—i
——
0
(J
t-J
L1
-
—
—
——
C
00
Q\
L
M
Q
c,
00
—
J.
——
c,
C
—
‘-0
L’3
C
—
L
-
3
J
4
00
C
cJ
—a
00
L-)
C
0
—
CC
j
00
.
D
‘)
C
t-)
00
z
p
0
CD
C.)
0
a
CD
C.)
0
0
CD
C,,
CD-
CD
0
C-)
0
0
CD
CD
OZ
CD
0
CD-
CD
-I
0
CD
CD
-o
C.)
0
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
N
0)
0’
CD
CD
N
0
0
CD-
-,
-,
C)
—o
00
00
0)-,
0)0
0
CD
0’
O’CD
CD
CD
0)
N
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
0)
N
CD
CD
CD
0)
N
CD
CD
w
0
0)-
0
1
C
CD
CD
0)-
CD
-I
CD
0)
N
C
-I
0
0)-
CD
CD
CD
CD
0)-
-,
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
N
0
0-
0
0)
CD
0)-
CD
0)
CD
CD
0)
N
C
CD
0)-
1
0)
0
CD
CD
CD
0)-
CD
0)
0
-,
0’
0)
CD
>
0)
0
0)-
C
0
CD
C
CD
CD
C
0)
>
0
CD
CD
0)
0)-
CD
0)
CD
C.)
0)-
0
0
0’
0)
CD
Cr1
CD
C)
0
p
C
00
p
CC
pC
C
LI,
C0
p
CC
pC
C
C
00
pC
C
C.’
Cb
C)
0
tI
Tj
CD
0
0
CD
CD
CD
0
C
CD
C)
CD
00
CD
-t
pC
C
C
pC
C
C
00
pC
C
LI,
pC
C
C
pC
C
I
C
H
(1
C
C
C
Cr1
r1
H
Cr1
pC
C
H
I.
C
H
C
C
pC
C
C.’0
In
t3
I’
C
?1
P
CC
C
CI,
-)
—
-_)
In
°
00
0
9C
p
CCC
t’)
00
0C
CC
C.’
—
C
C
0)
CD
0)
CD
CD
CD
CD-
0)
0
CD
0
CD
0
CD
p
CC
C
‘-C
pC
pC
C
C
C.’
LI’
pC
I
p
I
p
C
—1
p
C
LI,
C
—
I
N
.r
c”
.0I
0
>
a)
C
a)
C
a)
(0
a)
a)
CO
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
Cf
C
N
C
C
—
C
C
N
C
C
d
C
C.”
CN
C
SD
H
ct
I:
CiD
z
H
1)
zH
C
(ID
z
C
C-
H
o
o
L)
•
z
CH
N
o
CC
CC)
D
C
—
CC
CC
CN
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
N
o
C
—
C
“C
C
CN
C
N
o
C
—
C
C
CN
ThE
2°
CC
a)a)
C
-
-22
o
22
C
a)
a)
C
N
a)a)
C
-
0-C
C,.9
-
0
2°
C
C
a)
C
C
0
C
U
z
CO
•0
2
0)
U
-C
C
CC
C-)
-C
(1
0
C0
2
a)
0
Ci’
2
C
C’?
2
N,
a)
C
0
C)
CO
C
2
-C
0
C
N
C
C)
-o
a)
a)
C
U
2
0
C
CO
a)
22
a)°
_C
o
Ca)
Cr0)
-2
QQ
CO
E
-Q
CO
C)
a)
N0)
C)
o.2
C_
N4
F
2
-C
C 2
C)
C
I—
-C
C
C
0
C-’
C
•0
-C
a)
C
2
N
0
C
CC
-D
9
CC)
CC)
00
C
C’C
C
C 2
a)
0
-C
NC
2
C)
-C
C
a)
C
C
9
•0
a)
a)
C
-22
—a)
C
a)
0
C
-C
>-
C 2
a)
-C
0
9
a)
C
a)
-C
C)
C
C-’
C
0
.0)
rC
4
C)
a)
0)
a)
-0)
C
a)
C
C—
0
-C
NC
4
C
C
C
C)
C
C
C
cC
2
a)
C
0)-
C
0 2
0)-
0
-0)
NC
z
C
C))
N
—
C
N
NN
“C
N
.
o
CO
9?C’?C’??C
CC
SD
SD
CCCC)
?
U
c
SQ
N
C
CfC
C\
“C
CC
N
CC
—
C
‘(
“C
SQ
00
N
°
4
22’?
‘?r-
0
C
NN
“C
—
Cfl
NN
C
CC)
SQ
C
‘
C
“C
C
—
C.C)
C(
C
C’C
(‘C
‘
N
00
‘
—
SD
C
N
C
N
N
N
“C
Cf
C
C
—
00
—
C
—
Q
N
N
—
N
—
—
—
N
6
a)
CD
N
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
6
CD
CD
a).
CD
N
N
N
6
CD
CD
C)
C)
C)
0
C
a)
-a)
.a)
a)
a)
I-
a)
a)
-a)
a)
a)
0
6
CD
CD
CD
6
CD
CD
CD
N
N
CD
—
CD
a).
C’
CD
CD
6N
a)
o
—
‘I’
CD
CD
N
CD
CD
cl-i
H
CD
CD
6
CD
CD
CD
CD
6
00
z
H
CID
zH
z
C
CL)
Th
C
•
z
CH
CD
N
CD
6
N
N
6
CD
CD
6
CD
N
NJ
00
CD
h
CD
N
00
CD
N
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
6
CD
CD
CD
N
N
66
CD
CD
CD
a).
CD
CD
6
CD
N
CD
6
6N
6
CD
CD
C’
00
a)
N
+
a)
a)
C)
a)
a)-
0-.
0.
0_
0
—
_a)
a-)
a)
z
Ci
a)
•0
a)
C-)
-a)
a)
a)
C
-a)
C
-a)
a)
N
a)
a)
a)
-a)
-a)
a)
C
a)
a)
a)
N
a)
a)
-a)
a)
0
a)
a)
0
-a)
a)
0
C
N
a).
a)
-a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
I
a)
a)
a)
0
a)
0
a)
N
a)
a)
-a)
Ci
-a)
C
0
C.)
-C
a)
a)
0
Ca
a)
C
0N
a)
0
Ca
-a)
a)
a)
a)
N
a)
a)
a)
.0
-C
z
C)
a)
C
a)
C)
a)
C
a)
a)
-a)
0I
a)
0N
0
a)
C
a)
a)
C
a)
a)
a)
-a)
a)
C)
a)
a)
a)
a)
N
a)
a)
-C
0
0
a)
N
a)
a)
C
a)
0
-a)
a)
C
a)
C.)
a)
a)
a)
C)
C)
--C
-a)
C
a)
a)
a)
C
C
C..
-c
a.
C
a
CC
IC
C
a)
C)
C-)
0
a)
a)
0
-a)
C
a)
Ca
C
9-
-a)
C
N
C)
-a)
a)
a)
a)a)
_a)
Ca)
9-
a
Z
CD
))
\D
C’
NN
CD
—
N
tC
a)
CD
—
—
N
N
CD
a)
CD
N
—
C’
00
—
.
N
00
N
.
C’
—
C’
00
N
‘t
C’
C)
NN
\C)
C
9r
00
—
N
C.
00
C’
NN
CD
a)
t
t
N
00
C’
NN
C’
N
I
C
N
‘
‘C
N
—
00
N
,.
N
CD
N
00
C’
a)
N
‘(
00
C.C
00
CD
a)
CD
C’
—
N
CD
00
—
N
—
a)
N
CD
CD
‘C
C.C
CD
——
00
N
N
C
C’
00
00
rfl
N
t
L(
\C
00
—
C’
a
—
C
N
00
N
——
c)
N
C
N
—
N
C’
C’
NN
C
00
D
—a
—
j
—
co
—
—
D
00
C
00
D
‘.D
QD
—
00
L1
‘C
D
—
‘)
CC
t’,)
C
C
t)
C
00
—
—
LI
C
b
b?2°
U
C
—
C
00
00
—
L’J
4
00
C
‘.0
Q
C
C
C
00
—a
‘.c
)
0
—
‘.0
C
‘.)
—
p
‘.1
CD
N
CD
C
C
CD
CD
CD
H
0
N
CD
CD
C)
C
-t
C
C
C
-t
I
H
0
C
CD
CD
t’.)
C
CD
CD
C)
C
-t
C
C)
0
1
C
CD
CD
C,)
t)
C
C-’
CD
N
CD
CD
><
C,)
CD
00)
C,’C)
-to
0-t
CD0
.CD
CD’
CD
CD
‘—v
CD
C)
C
I
C)
0
-t
C
CD
C
‘-C
C)
C
‘-C
0
z
C
C
C
‘-C
CD
C
0)
C)
C-’
C
1
C
C-’
CD
C
C
C
0-’
CD
C
N
CD
C
CD
0
C
C-
0)
CD
C
CD
‘-C
C
0-’
C
-t
C
0)
CD
C
C
C
U,
‘-C
C,,
C
Co
C
C..
C
0)
S
C
CD
C
C
0)
C
D)
C)
CC
CCD
CD
0
C
C)
C
V-’-’
C)
CD
0
C
C-
CD
C
C
C
C-)
-t
CD
Co
C
0
CD
S
C)
0)
CD
C
CD
0
C
CD
7-
CD
1
99
9
C
C
9
C
C
99
t’.)
C
0
-
p
C
C
p
C
C
Lit
99999
C
—
C
C
°
C
00
—
44n
9
C
C
C
Lit
C
H
1-ri
C
C
C
(/-)
H
cf
99999
Lit
—
C
C
C
°
‘-
C
CC
—
—
fl
00
-)
I
C
p
C
C
Lit
999
—
C
Lit
In
p
C
C
Lit
p
C
C
00
p
p
Lit
p
C
Lit
0C
Lit
“
0
p
C
t1,
p
C
Lit
pp
Lit
C
0
p
00
C
C
C
C
D)
CD
-t
CD
S
CD
0-
0)
C
C
C
CD
C)
CD
0
p
99C
CCC
CC
—
Lit
—
00
p
C
C
Lit
p
p
C
C
Lit
pp
—
Lit4
-
C)
C
C
Cci,
C
CC
Cq
C
C
a)
0
C)
0C
0
Ca
a)
a)
2-
0
z
C
Ca
C)
I-
D
c4
C
LSTh
Ci
Ci
C
1a
C
C
C
C•
C
C
C
C
C
C
C,
CI)
H
H
CI)
zH
0
CI)
z
0
o
Ho
H
z0
L.fl
ci
ci
C
0
c’
C,
2r
ci
C
—
C
C
C
•0
C
C,
t
‘0
C
0
a)
a)
C)
CO
z
Ca
‘C)
a)
E
U
a)
Ca
a)
Ca
C-)
>
a)
0
0
C
C-)
>
0
Ca
a)
C,,
a)
>
01
C
S
0C>
C
0
C
a)
Ca
a)
0
U
>C
0
S
0S
0
2-0
C
0S
U
-S
0
S
0
Ca
0
U
0S
C)
CO
U
a)
U
‘C
0
Ca
U
C
C
0
U
a)
I
a)
0
C0
CS
a)
ci,
CO
2-
0
C
-S
a)
z
a)
Ca
to
z
C
a) 1-
C.)
a)
2
0
C
2-
Ca
a)
z
C)
C
2
C
C),
to
C
S
C
Ca
ci)
a)C
C
S
a)
C,)
a)
2-
Cl)
I
a
Z
C
00
C
C,)
c—
N
C
C”l
c
N
0
C
C
00
-
—
C-C
C
C
N
-4
-
2fl
-
C
C-C
00
C’c
Cc
c)
CC
N
C-4
00
C
—
C-
fl
C-C
N
r
tf
N
-
C
C
rc-,
L)
\C
e
r
r
r
-
tr
t
CCCC
—
C
C’
C
•
C
C
CCCCCCC
00
C
CC
—
C
m
CC
C
0
C
CC
C
C
C
C
00
00
)
C,f
00
00
t
NN
C’
00
-
-‘at
c
C
fa
rca
t
C-C
00
NN
t
t
N
t
N
t
t’
——
N
—
NNN
NN
N
N
—
N
—
NN
2l)
N
—
NN
NN
N
—
—
N
N
NNN
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Groundwater
Remediation
Objective
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
Class
I
f
Class
II
(mg!L)
I
(mg!L)
14808-79-8
[Sulfate
400
400c
7440-28-0
[Thallium
0.002c
0.02°
7440-62-2
[Vanaciium
.
0.049
7440-66-6
[Zinc
5.0°
10°
Chemical
Name
and
Groundwater
Remediation
Objective
Notations
The groundwater remediation
objective
is equal
to the
ADL
for carcinogens
according
to
the procedures
specified
in
35
III.
Adm.
Code
620
or
the I in
1.000,000
cancer
risk
level,
whichever
is
greater.
b
Oral
Reference
Dose
andior
Reference
Concentration
under
review
by
USEPA.
Listed
values
subject
to
chge.
These
Groundwater
Remediation Objectives
are
for
the
Direct
Ingestion
of
Groundwater
Component
of
the Groundwater
Ingestion
Route.
For
values
to use
when
calculating
the
Soil
Remediation
Objective
for the
Soil
Component
of
the Groundwater
Ingestion
Route,
see
Section
742.Appendix
B,
Table
F.
°
Value
listed is
also
the
Groundwater
Quality
Standard
for
this
chemical
pursuant
to 35
Ill. Adm.
Code
620.410
for
Class
I
Groundwater
or
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.420
for Class
II Groundwater.
d
This
chemical
is
included
in the
Total
Dissolved
Solids (TDS)
Groundwater
Quality
Standard
of
1,200
mg/l
pursuant
to 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.410
for
Class
I Groundwater
or 35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.420
for Class
II Groundwater.
e
Value
for non-carcinogens calculated
according
to
the
procedures
in 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
620.Appendix A.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
-a
—
00
00
-
-a
—
—
tn
L’J
tJ
cM
—
—
c
—
—
c
co
c
c,
c
c
oo
—
c
c
—
—
ci
c’
o
c
—
cc’
—
c
4
.
00
c
-a
oo
4
cM
C
\Q
cM
W
—
C
C
-
t’.)
C)
—)
4
cc’
j
0
0
0
CD
(1
0
CD
C-)
0
0
Co
0
CD
I
0
0
CD
CD
N
d
PD
PD
CD
0
—o
o
C)
00
CD
PD-
PD
PDPD
CD
CD
PD
N
0
C)
C)
0;
N
0
0
0
CD
PD
CD
CD
CD
PD
CD
Co
C)
PD-
0
0
CD
PD-
CD
PD-
CD
CD
PD
N
0
0
CD
PD
CD
PD
PD
C)
CD
CD
PD
N
0
0
PD
C)
CD
PD
CD
PD-
•
CDCD
PD
PD-
PD
‘0
PD
PD
CD
PD
C)
0
1
C)
CD
0
PD
CD
0—
0
0
I
C
C)
‘I’
C)
PD
PD-
CD
PD
CD
PD
CD
C)
PD
C/)
CD
C)
0
H
p
C
C
p
C
C
CM
ppa4.C
CC
C
L-)
C
-p.
o
a-
0
a-
a
0
a-
p
a-
p
C
C
0
C
CM
a-
OCD
‘—s.
C)
‘—
(-)0
0
o
J
OQC
Cl)
—.
o
-
•
CD
CDH
I
p
C
C
C
p
C
C
CM
I
p
C
C
C
H
C-)
C
C
C
CM
1-Ti
I
C
H
C
C-i
H
C
C
a-
pp
C
C
C
C
C
CM
H
p
C
p
C
t’J
CM
pp
t’)
C
0
p
p?0
C
C
I
p
C
C
t’-)
C)
COD)
CD
p
C
CM
p
CM
!i
bPP
C
C
C
C
C
C
°
CC
cc
c
0
CM
CM
t:)j
p
C
CM
pp
p
C
CM
z
C
H
CD
0
I1
0
0
0
H
0
(I.)
H
‘(0
—
—
a
—
—
00
t’J
—
—
——
—00
C
—
Vi
00
CO
Vi
t)
t)
00
00
D
CO
00
—
—
C
CO
CO
CC
——
00
C
t’-)
—
Vi
C
3
C
4
00
4
CO
00
Vi
—)
.
oo
00
CO
C
Vi
Vi
.)
00
CO
—
Vi
CO
Vi
Vi
t’)
0(0
0(0
00
—0
.
4
-
C
—0
(-
0(0
00
Vi
—
00
—
CO
CO
Vi
-J
00
——
4
0(0
00
—0
—
00
—
C
4
Vi
00
J
—
Vi
Vi
Vi
Co
—
C
4
(.)
—-.0
—
C
J
00
CO
Cl)
C
W
p
CD
0
C
0
-t
(I)
0
0
0
0-I
0
C
C)
CD
C)
(0
-t
0
CD
>4
P.)
C)
0
0
CD
CD
C
00
CD
C
0
t-..)
S
0
CD
C
CD
CD
0
P.)
0
0
CD
>4
P.)
C)
0
-t
0
C)
C
N
CD
C
CD
7.
0
0
4
0
0
‘0
‘0
‘0
‘0
CD
>4
C)
C
C
-i
0
C)
C)
0
CD
C
CD
CD
0
P.)
C)
C
0 -I
CD
0
C
>4
CD
CI
(0
C)
C
(0-
CD
(0
(0
C-)
x
(0
‘0
(0
C—)
tn
0
CD
C
N
CD
C
CD
C
01-.
0
C-
P.’
rn
C
(0-
0
0)
C
C
0
0
>4
CD
0
C)
C
C-
P.)
P.)
CD
CC
CO
CD
0
CO
C
C0C
CD
C
CD
C
CCC
CD
C
CD
t)
C
0
CD
C
C
0I
CD
0<
C
(0-
C-
P.)
P.)
CD
to)
4.).
CD
C
C
C
CD
C
C
CD
0- -i
C
C•)
C
CD
C)
0)
P.’
CD
0-.)
C)
C-
0
-i
C
C
-I
C
C
CD
-to
C.
0
CD
—C
CDCD
C
CD
C.)
N
+
C
N
pp9-
C
C
—0
4
-0-.
C
0
n
pC
C
—0
10.
p
C
Vi
I
p
CCC
0--)
pC
C
0
pC
C
C
to)
1
pC
C
C
p
—-.0
II
pC
C
0—.)
CH
C
C
C
H
Ci)
CH
C
IC
H
pC
C
—0
9C
C
C
pC
0
I
p
—-0
0
pC
C
C
—0
p
0-3
Vi
en
CO
0
p
C
Vi
L4
p
C
C
Vi
I
9C0
COMC
C--..)
‘
C
Vi
—
pC
C
Vi
pC
C
C
C
to)
p
—p
p
C
—a
—0
pC
C
C
C.)
COO
—C)
(000
CC
CO
CD
CD
C
0—
C
C)
C)
C)D’
—-C)
COP.)
C)
p
C
-a
p
C
4.).
p
—0
I
p
C
0-.)
Vi
00
0
-.J
-.
—
00
—
—
00
C
00
D
\Q
0
—
00
U
—
0
0
L3
W
0
.,)
C
D
0
—
00
—
C
a
a
00
b
C
1i
D
—
0
00
00
—
)
4
W
00
0
00
C
0
L1
0
00
U
t
(0
0
-‘
bJ
-
C.IC
D
4
0
CD)
—
p
C)
0
-i
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
>4
CD
CD
CD
CD
0
0
CD
0
-t
0
CD
CD
CD
0
C)
CD
CD
C)
CD
0
CD
CD
I
C)
CD
0
-t
0
CD
CD-.
C)
;3t)
00
C)
C)
CD
0
C)
CD
N
C)
CD
C)
Cl)
CD
C)
C)CD
CDC)
-to
0-t
-
0
OC)
C)CD
.—
C)
I
Ut
0
0
0
I
Ut
C)
0
C)
CD
0
C)
0
CD
C)
CD
0
C)
CD
CD
C)
CD
0
1
0
0
CD
C)
CD
0
z
0
C)
CD
N
C)
CD
0
CM
0
0-.
-C
0
CD
C)
CD
C)
0
CD
0
-C
CD
CD
C)
CD
0
CD
C)
CD
CM
C-)
CM
0
CM
0
0-.
C)
CD
CD
C)
C)
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
C)
CD
C)
—..<
C)
oCD
CD
CD0
CD
C)
CD..
‘—
C)
t’J
C)
CD
CD
C)
CD
0
0
Q
C)
CM
0
-CC)
CDo
C)
CD
CD
0..
(DC)
C)
CD
C)
C)
CD
CD
C)
C)
CD
C)
CD
C)
CD
C)
-C
9
0
0
00
C-
99
0
0
00
Ut
Ut
99
C,
p
0
0
UI
p
0
Ut
9999
0
—
00
Ut
‘
0
00
‘
.1.
4
00
Ut
p
0
H
C)
0
rj
0
0
Cl)
p
0
0
H
C
I1
C,C
C.
p
0
t)
I.
0
p
0
00
I
p
Ut
p
0
0
Ut
p
0
p
0
Ut
p
0
Ut
C-
—
0
0
-
p
0
Ut
p
0
Ut
p
0
Ut
9999
.)
Ut
0
0
Ut
‘
.CD.
00
C,
C,
Ut
0
0
p
e
t1
C)
C)o
C)
000
OCD
CDC)
C)
CD
C)
SCD
C)
0..
CD-
0
CD
CM
C)
CD
0
C)
C)CD
CMCD
C)
p
p
UI
Ut
pp
0
0
p
Ut
p
t-.3
C)
CD
CM
CC•
2002
C)
—C)
cOO
U
.
-0
z
.2
U
c1
0
fl
CC
cC
o
‘fl
C)
000
—
C•\C•C•-
CC
‘
1f
C
C
C
00
C
C.
C
.0
C
C
C.
H
CC
c..1
C.
H
C,)
z
C
H
z
C/)
z
C
-Th
o
CH
z
0
If)
o
00
—
CC
t
In
C.
C
N
If)
0
In
C
—C.
—
C
CC
z
C)
2
CO
U
C)
C)
0
C)
N
In
0
C)
0
C)
0
0
N
C)
CO
C)
C)
0
CO
>
C)
0
0
C.)
0
>
C)
0
C)
Cl)
0
CO
20
0
2
0
0
C)
CO
C)0
U
.0
C)
0
0
C)
I-
2
0
CO
0
U
0
0
0
2
0
CO
U
CO
C)
0
2
U
0
C)
U
CO
U
0
C)
U
C)
0
0
0
2
0
CO
C)
Cl)
2
0
CO
0
C)
VI
C)
-e
00
C)
C
1-
:1
C)
1
C)
z
CO
C)
CO
Cl)
z
C
CO
C)
0
C)
I-
C)
0-
C)
z
C
CM
0I
0
C
0
Ci)
0-
0
o
Z
\C
C’
C
00
C
Cd)
Nt
E-;-
01
.
C
C
C
D
00
0
—
cn
CC
N
N
00
C
Cl)
—
N
‘n
DN
N
In
N
C
C)
U
CCV)
1
CC
CCCCCCC
00
C
CC
—
N
cn
C)
C)
C)
C)
C
C)
C)
n
C
(4
2
00
00
‘)
t
00
In
t
2
00
t
c2)
rn
c’)
N
NN
00
C)
—
C
‘f)
C’)
0
ct
00
NN
In
N
t
N
C)
——
N
—
NNN
N
N
N
N
—
N
NN
In
N
—
N
N
NNN
—
N
NN
0
CO
Co
0)
C
2
0-
2
•0
C)
C)
C
Cl)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
GW
0b
Concentration
used
to Calculate
Tier
1 Soil
Remediation
Objectives’
CAS
No.
Chemical
Name
Class
I
Class
II
(mgIL)
(mgIL)
7440-22-4
Silver
0.05c
17440-23-5
Sodium
14808-79-8
Sulfate
400c
400c
7440-28-0
Thallium
0.002’
0.02’
7440-62-2
Vanadium
O.O
49
c
0.
l
7440-66-6
Zinc
5.0c
lOc
Chemical
Name and
Groundwater
Remediation
Objective
Notations
a
The
Equation
S17
is used
to calculate
the
Soil
Remediation
Objective
for the Soil
Component
of the
Groundwater
Ingestion
b
Route;
this
equation
requires
calculation
of
the
Target
Soil
Leachate
Concentration
(C)
from Equation
S18:
C
= DF
x
GWObJ.
Value
listed is
the
Water Health
Based
Limit
(HBL)
for
this chemical
from
Soil
Screening
Guidance:
User’s Guide,
incorporated
by
reference
at Section
742.210.
The HBL
is equal
to the non-zero
MCLG
(if available);
the MCL
(if
available);
or,
for carcinogens,
a cancer
risk
of
1
.OE-6
(based on
a
30
year
and
350 days/year
exposure
scenario),
and
for
noncarcinogens
is equal
to a Hazard
Quotient
of 1.0.
NOTE: These
GW
0
bJ
concentrations
are
not
equal to
the
Tier 1
Groundwater
Remediation
Objectives
for
the Direct
Ingestion
of Groundwater
Component
of
the Groundwater
Ingestion
Route,
listed
in
Section
742.Appendix
B,
Table
E.
C
Value
listed
is also
the
Groundwater
Quality
Standard
for
this chemical
pursuant
to
35
Ill. Adm.
Code 620.410
for
Class
I
Groundwater
or 35
III. Adm.
Code
620.420 for
Class II
Groundwater.
d
Value
listed
is
equivalent
to
the Human
Threshold
Toxicant
Advisory
Concentration
(H11’AC)
calculated
according
to the
methods
in
35
Ill.
Adm. Code
620.Appendix
A for
noncarcinogens.
For
carcinogens,
the value
listed
is
equal
to
the
1 .OE-6
risk
level
(based
on a 30
year
and 350
days/year
exposure
scenario).
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
)
to
C
C
C
N
C
C
C
rf
C
rn
00
to
C
C
C
C
to
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
00
to
CO
C
to
C
C
C
C
C
to
C
C
C
N
N
00
to
C
C
C
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
N
N
to
El
o&,
to
to ot
C
C
CCC
CC
C
N
Co0
C
00
to
to
to
C
C
C
CC
0
CC
N
I-
—-
N
to
C
C
C
C
00
C
H
rf)
H
C
H
z
CI)
z
C
o
Cc)
H
C
z
(E
a)
C
C.)
C
•—..CO
—
I
L4
d
*T*I.C.*i*iI*i*
*1*
t
C
—.
CO
I
!!W!!
E 0
C
— 00
C
C
. C
C
C
Ci)
a)
H
-d
‘a
a)
0
C)
I
a)
a)
a)
C
0-
C
C)
S.
to
z
CO
a)
CO
I
I
a)
C
a)
C)
a)
0-
C
C)
CO
a)
a)
E
I
a)
CO
c
C
C
C
a)
a)
a)
a)
0l)
-d
I
a)
a)
a)
CC
‘S
a)
CO
C
0-
C
C)
C
a)
C
0
C
U
I
a)
a)
N
a)
C
C
C)
9
0
C
U
a)
a)
I
C)
a)
CC
a)
C
C
C)
9
CO
a)
C
C
C)
9
C
CO
;
I
l
i4j4j4°i
I-
I
C
N
‘jj
*I*I*I*
*I*IQ
*1* *1*
*I*I**I*
*1*1*1*1*1*1
*1 *
*1
•:
“-‘
I
!
!.
.
i
!
U ‘
HHHH
‘
H
Cl)
H
rI)
C
C
C
H
C
z
a)
a.)
a)
C
C
a.)
02
a)
a)
a)
C
C
C)
02
C.)
a)
a)
a)
C
C
C.)
Q
z
a)
a)
C
0
C
a.)
c
C
+
02
C)
‘a)
.-
-
-
U)
a)
a)
C
a)
a)
)
a)
a)
—
-
-
.L
a)
-d
-
-°
‘
0
>1
EL
0
o
a)C
a)’
0
:
.
‘k:
I44ZZIP.
a.’E-
—
I
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Soil
Groundwater
Soil
Gas
Chemical
Name
and
Soil
Remediation
Objective
Notations
a
Soil
remediation
objectives
based
on
human
health
criteria
only.
b
Calculated
values
correspond
to
a
target
hazard
quotient
of
1.
Calculated
Tier
I
remediation
objective
exceeds
the
C,,
value
of
the
chemical
in
soil.
Therefore,
thç_
of
the
chemical
is
shown.
d
Calculated
values
correspond
to
a
cancer
risk
level
of
1
in
1,000,000.
40
CFR
761
contains
applicability
requirements
and
methodologies
for
the
development
of
PCB
remediation
obiectives.
Requests
for
approval
of
a
Tier
3
evaluation
must
address
the
applicability
of
40
CFR
761.
Calculated
at
25°C.
For
Dalapon
the
critical
temperature
(Tc)
is
not
available.
For
Xylenes
(total),
the
enthalpy
of
vaporization
(Hv,b)
at
the
normal
boiling
point
is
not
available.
Calculated
Tier
1
remediation
objective
exceeds
the
Csat
value
of
the
chemical
in
soil
gas.
Therefore,
the
Csat
of
the
chemical
is
shown.
h
Calculated
Tier
1
remediation
objective
exceeds
the
solubility
of
the
chemical
in
water.
Therefore,
the
solubility
of
the
chemicalis
shown.
Residential
Industrial!
ADL
Residential
Industrial!
Residential
Industrial/
Chemical
Name
Commercial
Commercial
Commercial
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
(mg/m3)
(mg/m3)
Toluene
240c
240c
*
53()1
53()I1
140000g
140000g
l,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
220b
980’
*
35”
35”
1,600”
4,300g
l,l,l-Trichloroethane
560c
5(51JC
*
1300h
1300h
770,000”
870
,000g
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
900c
91J1JC
*
4,40011
4400h
170
000’
170
000
Trichloroethylene
026d
19d
*
0d
6”
l”
1300d
Trichlorofluoromethane
31”
190”
*
48
26()
970001)
595000b
Vinyl
acetate
2-flb
1600b
*
2500b
15000”
28000b
174000b
Vinyl
chloride
0.011
d
*
0rd
OM”
4413d
m-Xylene
*
17,000
b
52000g
o-Xylene
98”
l40’
*
15011
1ch
17000b
52
,000g
p-Xylene
75”
120c
*
12J”
160001)
55,000
Xylenes
(total)
100c,f
,
16000b
49OOO
Mercury
is
measured
in
mg/L.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
C
Tier
2
Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.Table
B
SSL
Parameters
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
AT
Averaging
Time
for
yr
Residential
=
6
Noncarcinogens
in
Industrial/Commercial
25
Ingestion
Equation
Construction
Worker
=
0.1
15
AT
Averaging
Time
for
yr
Residential
=
30
Noncarcinogens
in
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Inhalation
Equation
Construction
Worker
0.1
15
AT
Averaging
Time
for
yr
SSL
70
Carcinogens
BW
Body
Weight
kg
Residential
=
15,
noncarcinogens
70,
carcinogens
Industrial/Commercial
=
70
Construction
Worker
=
70
Csat
Soil
Saturation
mg/kg
Appendix
A,
Table
A
or
Chemical-Specific
or
Concentration
Equation
S29
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
A
C
Target
Soil
Leachate
mg/L
Equation
SI
8
in
Groundwater
Standard,
Health
Advisory
Concentration
Appendix
C,
Table
A
concentration,
or
Calculated
Value
d
Mixing
Zone
Depth
m
SSL
or
2
m
or
Equation
S25
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
A
da
Aquifer
Thickness
m
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
[
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
d
Depth
of
Source
m
Field
Measurement
or
Estimation
Site-Specific
(Vertical
thickness
of
contamination)
DA
Apparent
Diffusivity
cm2
/s
Equation
S
10
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
A
D
Diffusivity
in
Air
cm2
/s
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
D
Diffusivity
in
Water
cm2
/s
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
DF
Dilution
Factor
unitless
Equation
S22
in
20
or
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
A
ED
Exposure
Duration
for
yr
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Ingestion
of
Carcinogens
Construction
Worker
=
ED
Exposure
Duration
for
yr
Residential
=
30
Inhalation
of
Carcinogens
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Construction
Worker
=
ED
Exposure
Duration
for
yr
Residential
=
6
Ingestion
of
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Noncarcinogens
Construction
Worker
=
1
ED
Exposure
Duration
for
yr
Residential
30
Inhalation
of
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Noncarcinogens
Construction
Worker
=
1
ED
Exposure
Duration
for
the
yr
Residential
=
30
Direct
Ingestion
of
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Groundwater
Construction
Worker
=
EDML
Exposure
Duration
for
yr
SSL
70
Migration
to
Groundwater
Mass-Limit
Equation
S28
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
EF
Exposure
Frequency
d/yr
Residential
=
350
lndustriallConimercial
=
250
Construction
Worker
=
30
F(x)
Function
dependent
on
unitless
SSL
0.
194
Urn/Ut
f,
Organic
Carbon
Content
g/g
SSL
or
Surface
Soil
0.006
of
Soil
Field
Measurement
Subsurface
soil
=
0.002,
or
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Site-Specific
GW0bJ
Groundwater
Remediation
mg/L
Appendix
B,
Table
E,
Chemical-Specific
or
Calculated
Remediation
Objective
35
IAC
620.Subpart
F,
or
Equation
S23
in
Appendix
C,
Table
A
H’
Henry’s
Law
Constant
unitless
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
i
Hydraulic
Gradient
rn/rn
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
I
Infiltration
Rate
rn/yr
SSL
0.3
‘M-i.
Infiltration
Rate
for
rn/yr
SSL
0.18
Migration
to
Groundwater
Mass-Limit
Equation
S28
IFsoiiaâj
Age
Adjusted
Soil
(mg-yr)/(kg-d)
SSL
114
.
.
Ingestion
Factor
for
(residential)
Carcinogens
IR501
Soil
Ingestion
Rate
rng/d
Residential
=
200
Industrial/Commercial
=
50
Construction
Worker
=
480
ILLNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
j
Source
[
Parameter
Value(s)
lRw
Daily
Water
Ingestion
L/d
Residential
=
2
Rate
IndustriallCommercial
K
Aquifer
Hydraulic
rn/yr
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
Conductivity
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Kd
(Non-ionizing
Soil-Water
Partition
cm
3/g
or
L/kg
Equation
SI
9
in
Calculated
Value
organics)
Coefficient
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Kd
(Ionizing
organics)
Soil-Water
Partition
crn3lg
or
L/kg
Equation
Sl
9
in
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Chemical
and
pH-Specific
(see
Appendix
Coefficient
C,
Table
I)
Kd
(Inorganics)
Soil-Water
Partition
cm3/g
or
L/kg
Appendix
C,
Table
J
Chemical
and
pH-Specific
Coefficient
K0
Organic
Carbon
Partition
crn
3/g
or
L/kg
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
Coefficient
or
Appendix
C,
Table
I
K,
Saturated
Hydraulic
rn/yr
Appendix
C,
Table
K
Site-Specific
Conductivity
Appendix
C,
Illustration
C
L
Source
Length
Parallel
to
m
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
Groundwater
Flow
PEF
Particulate
Emission
m
3/kg
SSL
or
Equation
S15
in
Appendix
C,
Residential
1.32
•
IO
or
Site-Specific
Factor
Table
A
Industrial/Commercial
=
1.24
•
I
o
or
Site-Specific
PEF’
Particulate
Emission
m
3/kg
Equation
S16
in
Appendix
C,
Table
A
1.24
•
108
or
Site-Specific
Factor
adjusted
for
using
PEF
(industrial/commercial)
Agitation
(construction
worker)
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
[
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
QIC
Inverse
of
the
mean
(gIm2-s)/(kg/m3
)
Appendix
C,
Table
H
Residential
=
68.81
(
used
in
VF
equations)
concentration
at
the
center
IndustriallCommercial
85.81
of
a
square
source
Construction
Worker
=
85.81
Q/C
Inverse
of
the
mean
(g/m2-s)/(kg/m3
)
SSL
or
Appendix
C,
Table
H
Residential
=
90.80
(used
in
PEF
equations)
concentration
at
the
center
Industrial/Commercial
=
85.81
of
a
square source
Construction
Worker
=
85.81
RIU
Inhalation
Reference
mg/rn3
IEPA
(II’JS/HEAST
Illinois
EPA
Toxicological-Specific
Concentration
(Note:
for
Construction
Workers
use
subchronic
reference
concentrations)
MDO
Oral
Reference
Dose
mg/(kg-d)
IPA-RIS44S4
Illinois
EPA
Toxicological-Specific
(Note:
for
Construction
Worker
use
subchronic
reference
doses)
S
Solubility
in
Water
mg/L
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
SF0
Oral
Slope
Factor
(mg/kg-d)’
IEPA
(IPJS/HEAST)
Illinois
EPA
Toxicological-Specific
T
Exposure
Interval
s
Residential
=
9.5
•
108
Industrial/Commercial
=
7.9
•
I
o
Construction
Worker
=
3.6
•
106
TML
Exposure
Interval
for
yr
SSL
30
Mass-Limit
VolatilizationFactor
Equation
S26
THQ
Target
Hazard
Quotient
unitless
SSL
1
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
TR
Target
Cancer
Risk
unitless
Residential
1
06
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
Industrial/Commercial
1
06
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
Construction
Worker
=
lO
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
Urn
Mean
Annual
Windspeed
rn/s
SSL
4.69
URF
Inhalation
Unit
Risk
(ug/m3)1
IEPA
(IRIS/HEAST
Illinois
EPA
Toxicological-Specific
Factor
U1
EquivalentThreshold
rn/s
SSL
11.32
Value
of
Windspeed
at
7
m
V
Fraction
of
Vegetative
unitless
SSL
or
Field
Measurement
0.5
or
Site-Specific
Cover
VF
Volatilization
Factor
m
3/kg
Equation
S8
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
A
VF’
Volatilization
Factor
m
3/kg
Equation
S9
in
Calculated
Value
adjusted
for
Agitation
Appendix
C,
Table
A
VFML
Mass-Limit
Volatilization
m
3/kg
Equation
S26
in
Calculated
Value
Factor
Appendix
C,
Table
A
VF’ML
Mass-Limit
Volatilization
m
3/kg
Equation
S27
in
Calculated
Value
Factor
adjusted
for
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Agitation
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
[
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
Total
Soil
Porosity
LrdLsojj
SSL
or
0.43,
or
Equation
S24
in
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Gravel
=
0.25
Sand
=
0.32
Silt
=
0.40
Clay
0.36,
or
Calculated
Value
°a
Air-Filled
Soil
Porosity
LajJLsoij
SSL
or
Surface
Soil
(top
1
meter)
=
0.28
Equation
S2l
in
Subsurface
Soil
(below
1
meter)
=
0.13,
Appendix
C,
Table
A
or
Gravel
=
0.05
Sand=
0.14
Silt
-
0.24
Clay=
0.19,
or
Calculated
Value
Ow
Water-Filled
Soil
Porosity
LwateJLs011
SSL
or
Surface
Soil
(top
1
meter)
0.15
Equation
S20
in
Subsurface
Soil
(below
1
meter)
=
0.30,
Appendix
C,
Table
A
or
Gravel
=
0.20
Sand
=
0.18
Silt
=
0.16
Clay
=
0.17,
or
Calculated
Value
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
[
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
Pb
Dry
Soil
Bulk
Density
kg/L
or
g/cm
3
SSL
or
1.5,
or
Field
Measurement
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Silt=
1.6
Clay=
1.7,
or
Site-Specific
Ps
Soil
Particle
Density
g/cm
3
SSL
or
2.65,
or
Field
Measurement
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Site-Specific
psy
Water
Density
glcm3
SSL
1/(2b+3)
Exponential
in
Equation
unitless
Appendix
C,
Table
K
Site-Specific
S20
Appendix
C,
Illustration
C
USEPA,
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response.
EPA/SQO/R-95/036.
Updated
Quarterly.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
C
Tier
2
Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.Table
D
RBCA Parameters
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
AT
Averaging
Time
for
Carcinogens
yr
RBCA
70
AT
Averaging
Time
for
yr
RBCA
Residential
=
30
Noncarcinogens
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Construction
Worker
=
0.115
BW
Adult
Body
Weight
kg
RBCA
70
Csource
The
greatest
potential
mg/L
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
concentration
of
the
contaminant
of
concern
in
the
groundwater
at
the
source
of
the
contamination,
based
on
the
concentrations
of
contaminants
in
groundwater
due
to
the
release
and
the
projected
concentration
of
the
contaminant
migrating
from
the
soil
to
the
groundwater.
C()
Concentration
of
Contaminant
in
mg/L
Equation
R26
in
Calculated
Value
Groundwater
at
Distance
X
from
Appendix
C,
Table
C
the
source
C(x)/Csource
Steady-State
Attenuation
Along
the
unitless
Equation
Ri
5
in
Calculated
Value
Centerline
of
a
Dissolved
Plume
Appendix
C,
Table
C
d
Lower
Depth
of
Surficial
Soil
Zone
cm
Field
Measurement
100
or
Site-Specific
(not
to
exceed
100)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
D
Diffusion
Coefficient
in
Air
cm2
/s
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
Dtet
Diffusion
Coefficient
in
Water
cm2
/s
Appendix
C,
Table
B
Chemical-Specific
DS°
Effective
Diffusion
Coefficient
in
cm2
/s
Equation
R6
in
Calculated
Value
Soil
Based
on
Vapor-Phase
Appendix
C,
Table
C
Concentration
ED
Exposure
Duration
yr
RBCA
Residential
=
30
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Construction
Worker
=
EF
Exposure
Frequency
d/yr
RBCA
Residential
=
350
Industrial/Commercial
=
250
Construction
Worker
=
30
erf
Error
Function
unitless
Appendix
C,
Table
G
Mathematical
Function
f
Organic
Carbon
Content
of
Soil
g/g
RBCA
or
Surface
Soil
=
0.006
Field
Measurement
Subsurface
Soil
=
0.002
or
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Site-Specific
GWcomp
Groundwater
Objective
at
the
mg/L
Appendix
B,
Table
E,
Site-Specific
Compliance
Point
35
IAC
620.Subpart
F,
or
Equation
R25
in
Appendix
C,
Table
C
GWsource
Groundwater
Concentration
at
the
mg/L
Equation
Rl3
in
Calculated
Value
Source
Appendix
C,
Table
C
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
(
Parameter
Value(s)
H’
Henry’s
Law
Constant
cm3wate,Jcm3aj,
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
i
Hydraulic
Gradient
cm/cm
(unitless)
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
I
Infiltration
Rate
cm/yr
RBCA
30
IRair
Daily
Outdoor
Inhalation
Rate
m3/d
RBCA
20
IR011
Soil
Ingestion
Rate
mg/d
RBCA
Residential
=
100
Industrial/Commercial
=
50
Construction
Worker
=
480
IR
Daily
Water
Ingestion
Rate
L/d
RBCA
Residential
=
2
Industrial/Commercial
=
K
Aquifer
Hydraulic
Conductivity
cm/d
for
Equations
R15,
R19
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
and
R26
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
cm/yr
for
Equation
R24
K0
Organic
Carbon
Partition
cm3/g
or
L/kg
Appendix
C,
Table
E
or
Chemical-Specific
Coefficient
Appendix
C,
Table
I
k
Soil
Water
Sorption
Coefficient
cm3,Jg,0j1
Equation
R20
in
Calculated
Value
(non-ionizing
Appendix
C,Table
C
organics)
k,
Soil
Water
Sorption
Coefficient
cm3vate,Jgso
Equation
R20
in
Appendix
C,
Chemical
and
pH-Specific
(See
(ionizing
organics)
Table
C
Appendix
C,
Table
I)
k,
Soil
Water
Sorption
Coefficient
cm3,/g,0j1
Appendix
C,
Table
J
Chemical
and
pH-Specific
(
inorganics)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
[its
]
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
L
Depth
to
Subsurface
Soil
Sources
cm
RBCA
100
LF
Leaching
Factor
(mg/Lt)J
Equation
R14
in
Calculated
Value
(mg/kg,01)
Appendix
C,
Table
C
M
Soil
to
Skin
Adherence
Factor
mg/cm
2
RBCA
0.5
Pe
Particulate
Emission
Rate
g/cm
2-s
RBCA
6.9
•
RAFd
Dermal
Relative
Absorption
Factor
unitless
RBCA
0.5
RAFd
Dermal
Relative
Absorption
Factor
unitless
RBCA
0.05
(PNAs)
RAFd
Dermal
Relative
Absorption
Factor
unitless
RBCA
0
(
inorganics)
.
.
.
RBCA
RAFO
Oral
Relative
Absorption
Factor
umtless
1.0
RBSLair
Carcinogenic
ug/m
3
Equation
R9
in
Chemical-,
Media-,
and
Exposure
Risk-Based
Screening
Level
for
Appendix
C,
Table
C
Route-Specific
Air
RBSLair
Noncarcinogenic
ug/m
3
Equations
RIO
in
Chemical-,
Media-,
and
Exposure
Risk-Based
Screening
Level
for
Appendix
C,
Table
C
Route-Specific
Air
RfD1
Inhalation
Reference
Dose
mg/kg-d
JEPA
(JRIS/HEAST)
Illinois
Toxicological-Specific
EPA
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
[
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
RID0
Oral
Reference
Dose
mgl(kg-d)
JEPA
(LPJS/HEAST)
Illinois
Toxicological-Specific
EPA
(Note:
for
Construction
Worker
use
subchronic
reference
doses)
SA
Skin
Surface
Area
cm2/d
RBCA
3,160
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
Sd
Source
Width
Perpendicular
to
cm
Field
Measurement•
For
Migration
to
Groundwater
Route:
Groundwater
Flow
Direction
in
Use
200
or
Site-Specific
Vertical
Plane
For
Groundwater
remediation
.
objective:
Use
Site-Specific
S0
Source
Width
Perpendicular
to
cm
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
Groundwater
Flow
Direction
in
Horizontal
Plane
SF
Inhalation
Cancer
Slope
Factor
(mg/kg-d)1
IEPA
(IPJS/HEAST
Illinois
Toxicological-Specific
EPA
SF0
Oral
Slope
Factor
(mgIkg-d)
IEPA
(IRISfHEAST
Illinois
Toxicological-Specific
EPA
THQ
Target
Hazard
Quotient
unitless
RBCA
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
[
Units
[
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
TR
Target
Cancer
Risk
unitless
RBCA
Residential
=
1
O
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
Industrial/Commercial
=
1
06
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
Construction
Worker
=
I
O
at
the
point
of
human
exposure
U
Specific
Discharge
cm/d
Equation
RI
9
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
C
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
Uaj
Average
Wind
Speed
Above
cm/s
RBCA
225
Ground
Surface
in
Ambient
Mixing
Zone
Ugw
Groundwater
Darcy
Velocity
cm/yr
Equation
R24
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
C
VF
,
Volatilization
Factor
for
Surficial
kg/rn
3
Equation
R5
in
Calculated
Value
Soils
Regarding
Part
iculates
Appendix
C,
Table
C
VFsamb
Volatilization
Factor
(Subsurface
(mg/m
3
j)/(mg/kg
0
ji)
or
Equation
Ri
1
in
Calculated
Value
Soils
to
Ambient
Air)
kg/rn
3
Appendix
C,
Table
C
VF
5
Volatilization
Factor
for
Surficial
kg/rn
3
Use
Equations
R3
and
R4
in
Calculated
Value
from
Equation
R3
or
Soils
Appendix
C,
Table
C
R4
(whichever
is
less)
W
Width
of
Source
Area
Parallel
to
cm
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
Direction
to
Wind
or
Groundwater
Movement
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
[
Units
(
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
w
Average
Soil
Moisture
Content
g1,Jg0jj
RBCA
or
0.1,
or
Field
Measurement
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Surface
Soil
(top
1
meter)
0.1
Subsurface
Soil
(below
1
meter)
0.2,
or
Site-Specific
X
Distance
along
the
Centerline
of
cm
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
the
Groundwater
Plume
Emanating
from
a
Source.
The
x
direction
is
the
direction
of
groundwater
flow
ct,,
Longitudinal
Dispersitivity
cm
Equation
RI
6
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
C
a>,
Transverse
Dispersitivity
cm
Equation
R17
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
C
a
Vertical
Dispersitivity
cm
Equation
Rl
8
in
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
C
hair
Ambient
Air
Mixing
Zone
Height
cm
RBCA
200
3gw
Groundwater
Mixing
Zone
cm
RBCA
200
Thickness
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
fParameter
Value(s)
9
Volumetric
Air
Content
in
Vadose
cm
3
ajrJcm
3sojj
RBCA
or
Surface
Soil
(top
1
meter)
=
0.28
Zone
Soils
Equation
R2l
in
Subsurface
Soil
(below
I
meter)=
0.13,
Appendix
C,
Table
C
Or
Gravel
=
0.05
Sand
=
0.14
Silt=
0.16
Clay
=
0.
17,
or
Calculated
Value
0.
Volumetric
Water
Content
in
cm
3wateiJcm
3
soji
RBCA
or
Surface
Soil
(top
1
meter)
=
0.15
Vadose
Zone
Soils
Equation
R22
in
Subsurface
Soil
(below
1
meter)
Appendix
C,
Table
C
0.30,
or
Gravel
0.20
Sand
=
0.18
Silt=0.16
Clay=
0.17,
or
Calculated
Value
°T
Total
Soil
Porosity
cm
3
/cm
3
01
RBCA
or
0.43,
or
Equation
R23
in
Appendix
C,
Table
C
Gravel
=
0.25
Sand
=
0.32
Silt
=
0.40
Clay=
0.36,
or
Calculated
Value
First
Order
Degradation
Constant
d1
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
[
Units
[
Source
Parameter
Value(s)
ii;
pi
3.1416
Pb
Soil
Bulk
Density
g/cm3
RBCA
or
1.5,
or
Field
Measurement
(See
Appendix
C,
Table
F)
Gravel
=
2.0
Sand=
1.8
Silt=
1.6
Clay=
1.7,or
Site-Specific
p
Water
Density
g/cm3
RBCA
t
Averaging
Time
for
Vapor
Flux
s
RBCA
9.46
•
108
a
HEAST
—
Health
Effects
Asesment
Summary
Table&—USEPA,
Office
of
Solid
Waste
and
Emergency
Response.
EPAJS4O/R-95/036.
Updated
Quarterly.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
C:
Tier
2
Illustrations
and
Tables
Section
742.Table
E:
Default
Physical
and
Chemical
Parameters
D4eftse11e
Organic
Solubility
in
Diffuivity
in
Air
Diffucivity
in
Henry
Law
Carbon
Water
(5)
D4
Watei’-(
Contrant
(H)
P-al4i-tioR
Degradation
CAS
No.
heiea1
(mg/L)
(em,1s
eefei
Constant
(I’ee
(Ykg
Neutral
Organicc
83
32
9
Acenaphthene
444
0.0421
7.69E
6
0.00636
7-Q80
0.0034
67
64
1
Aeetee
400OO0
0-1-24
1.1IE
5
0.00159
0.0495
-1-59-72
60
8
Alachior
24
0,0-1-98
5.69-B
6
0,0U000-14
394
No-Data
116
06
3
Aldicarb
6000
00305
7.19E
6
0.0000000574
-14
0.O010
309
00
2
Aidrin
0,-1-8
0,01-3
4.86E
6
0.00697
2,450,000
0.00059
120
12
7
Anthracene
0,0434
0324
7.74E
6
0.00267
29500
0.00075
1912
24
9
Mfabe
0
0.025
8
00000008
45-1-
No
Data
71
43
2
Benene
1--50
U88
9.80E
6
042%
&8
0.0009
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Ofganie
Se4ubi44ty4fi
Diffusivity
in
Air
D&ffuwit’-i+
Henrys
Law
Carbon
Ofdef
Water
(S)
(Di)
Water
(D)
Constant
(H)
P4ii
Degradation
CAS
No.
heea4
(ed/s)
(25C
Coefficient
Getai+t
EKee)
(b4g)
56
55
3
Bee(aai4wacee
0004
005-1-0
004
0,G00-1-3.
9-8000
0O005-1-
205
99
2
Benzob)fluoranthene
00G4-
00226
5.56E
6
0004&
1,230,000
0.00057
207
08
9
Bene(k)eranthene
0000
0.0226
5.56E
6
0.000034
1,230,000
0.00016
65
85
0
Benzoic
Acid
O0
004
7.97E
6
0.000063
1
0.600
Ne-Data
50
32
8
Benzo(a)p)Tene
0.00162
004
9.OOE
6
000004é
40000
00006
111
‘11
1
Bis(2
chloroethyl)ether
17,200
0.0692
7.53E
6
G00-8
.1-54
0.0019
117
81
7
Bis(2
ethylhexyl)phthalate
044
0.0351
3.66E
6
0.00000418
15,100,000
0.0018
75
27
4
Bromodichioromethane
6740
0.0298
1.06E
5
0.0656
5&0
No
Data
75
25
2
Bromoform
3.400
0.0149
LO3E
5
0.0219
0.0019
71
36
3
Butanol
74,000
0.0800
9.30E
6
0.000361
0.01283
85
68
7
Butyl
Benzyl
Phthalate
0.0174
4.83E
6
0.0000517
57,500
0003E
86
74
8
Carbazole
748
0.0390
7.03E
6
0.000000626
339Q
No-Data
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
ganie
eie
Carbon
Wate-
D4
Water
(D
eaat-W)
atitiea
Degfadatiea
CAS
No.
Chemical
gLb
Coefficient
Constant
(b4Eg)
(44)
1563
66
2
Gabewaa
320
00249
643E-6
.00377
27
Ne-Data
75
15
0
Carbon
Disulfide
4-5-1-90
0404
1
pOE
5
1-24
454
No
Data
56
23
5
Carbon
Tetrachioride
792
0.0780
8.80E
6
4-2
1-74
0.0019
57
74
9
Chiordane
0056
0.0118
‘137E
6
0.00199
140000
0.00025
106
‘17
8
p
Chloroaniline
5200
00482
1.01E
5
0.0000136
664
Ne-Data
108
90
7
Chlorobenzene
472
0.0730
8.70E
6
0443
2-1-9
0.0023
124
48
1
Ch1orodiromonqethane
23600
0.0196
1.05E
5
0.0321
634
0.00385
67
66
3
Chloroform
7.920
0404
1.OOE
5
04
298
0.00039
95
57
8
2-Ch1efepheae
22,000
0.0501
9.46E
6
0,04-6
3-88
Ne-Data
218
01
9
0001-6
0.0248
6.21E
6
0.00388
398,000
0.00035
94
75
7
254—D
680
0.0231
7.3
1E-6
0,00000044-
45-1-
0,003-85
72
54
8
4,4’
DDD
0,09
00469
‘1.7613
6
0,0004-64
1,000,000
0.000062
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimenionles
Organic
Solubility
in
Diffuivity
in
Air
Diffuzivity
in
He+i’y’s-baw
Carbon
Ofdef
Water
(S)
(D1
Geta-(I4)
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
Coefficient
Contarit
ee
(Ykg)
44)
72
55
9
4,4’
DDE
0.42
0.0114
5.87E
6
000.864
1,170,000
0000042
50
29
3
4,4’
DDT
002
0.0137
4.95E
6
000033.2
2,630,000
0.000062
75
99
0
Da1apo
900,000
0.0111
946E4
000000264
&8
0.005775
5370
3
Dezo(aanthvaeene
0.00249
0.0202
5.18E
6
000000040
3-800.000
,00037
96
12
8
1,2
Dibromo
3
4-200
0.0212
7.02E
6
0.00615
4-2
0.001925
106
93
4
4-2—Dib4’emeethane
4200
0.0287
8.06E
6
0,030
9
0.005775
84
74
2
Di
n
butyl
Phthalate
4-4-4
0.0138
7.86E
6
000000000E
33,900
0.03013
95
50
1
1,2
Dichlorobenzene
4-56
00690
7.90E
6
0.0779
6-1-’
0.004-9
106
46
7
1,4-Dichlorebenzene
73.4
0.0690
?904
0.0996
647
0.0019
91
94
1
3,3
Dichlorobenzidine
3.A4
44-01-94
6.74E
6
0,0000004-64
724
0.0019
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Organic
imt
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
in
Air
Diffusivity
in
Henrys
Law
Ca’ben
Water
(S)
Water
(D
Constant
(H)
Paftii
Degradation
CAS
No.
G1emil
(mg/L)
Ceeffiei
Constant
fK)
b4Eg)
44)
75
34
3
1,1
Dichioroethane
5I060
0.0742
1.05E
5
04
3-1-,6
000W
107
06
2
1,2
Dichioroethune
520
044
9.90E
6
0.0401
4-74
0.0019
75
35
1
1,1
Dichloroethylene
2j250
0.0900
LO4E
5
4-07
0.0053
156
59
2
Cis
1,2
Dichloroethylcne
35O0
00736
1.13E
5
0467
354
000024
156
60
5
Trans
1,2
Dichloroethylene
6300
0.0707
1.19E
5
0485
524
0.00021
120
83
2
2,4
Dichlorophenol
4400
0.0346
8.77E
6
0.00013
4-47
0.00027
78
87
5
1,2
Dichloropropane
2800
0.0782
8.73E
6
01-1-&
434
0.00027
512
75
6
1,3
Dichloropropylene
2.800
0.0626
1.OOE
5
0426
454
0044-
(cis
+
trans)
60
57
1
Dieldrin
0495
0.0
125
4.71E
6
00006-l-9
21,400
0.00032
81
66
2
D4ethyl-Phthalate
1-080
0,0256
6.3
SE
6
000001-85
25-8
0.00619
4-05
67
9
24iethy1jefie1
?.8-70
0.0584
8,69E-4
0.000082
209
0,0495
51
28
5
234-4ii#epheiel
0.0273
0,06E-e
0.0000182
004
0.00132
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Organic
F4rst
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
in
Air
Diffus+ty-m
Henrys
Law
Caben
Water
(S)
(Di)
Water
(D)
Constant
(H’)
Partition
Degadati
CAS
No.
CheieaJ
mgiL)
(ed/s)
(ens)
WG)
Ceeffcit
Constant
(K0)
(Ykg)
(44
121
14
2
2,4
Dinirtotoluene
270
020
7.06E
6
0.0000038
954
0.00192
606
20
2
2,6
Dinitrotoluene
1-8
0.0327
7.26E
6
0004
692
0.00192
88
85
7
Dinpseb
0.0215
6.62E
6
0.0000189
-1-5-1-20
0.002817
117
84
0
Di
n
octyl
Phthalate
002
0.0151
3.58E
6
0.00274
83,200,000
0.0019
115
297
Endosulfan
054
0.0115
4.55E
6
0.000459
2440
0.07629
145
73
3
Ess4ethal
21,000
00294-
8.07E
6
0.0000000107
0,29
No
Data
72
20
8
Endrin
045
0.0125
4.74E
6
0.000308
12,300
0.00032
100
‘11
4
Ethylbenzene
1-69
00750
7.SOE
6
042
0003
206-44--0
Fluoranthene
0206
0.0302
6.35E
6
0.00066
107,000
0.000
19
86
73
7
Fluorene
1-9-8
0.0363
7.88E
6
0.00261
13,800
0,00069-1-
76448
Heptae1sef
o,-i-g
0.0112
5.69E6
60,7
1,410,000
044
1024
57
3
Heptachior
epoxide
02
0.0132
4.23E
6
0.00039
83,200
0.00063
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Organic
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
in
Air
Diffuswity-
Henry’s
Law
afbe
Order
Water
(S)
Di)
Water
(D)
Constant
(H)
Partition
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(G1,1S)
Geeffieierit
Constant
9o)
Ykg
118
74
1
Hexachlorobenzene
64
0.0542
5.91E
6
0.0541
55,000
0.00017
319
84
6
Alpha
HCH
(alpha
BHC)
Q
0.0142
7.34E
6
0.000435
4-O
0.0025
58
89
9
Gamma
HCH
(Lindane)
6
0.0
142
7.34E
6
0,000&74
-1-070
00029
77
47
4
Hexachlorocyclo
1-4
0.0161
7.21E
6
4-44
200,000
-14
Pcntadicnc
67
72
1
Hexachioroethane
0.0025
6.SOE
6
0459
1-
000W2
193
39
5
Indeno(l,2,3
c,d)pyrene
000002
0.0190
5.66E
6
0.0000656
3,470,000
7-8-59
1
1epherene
12,000
0062
6.76E
6
0.000272
464
0.01238
7439
97
6
Mereery
—
03G
6.30E
6
0467-
—
No
Data
72
43
5
Methoxychior
004
00440
4.46E
6
0000648
97,700
0.0019
74
83
9
Methyl
Bromide
15,200
0.0728
1.21E
5
0456
4-04
0.01824
1634
04
4
Methyl
tertiary
butyl
ether
51,000
040
1.IOE
5
0.0241
-14-4
No
Data
75
09
2
Methylene
Chloride
13,000
0-444-
1.17E
5
00898
4-1-4
0044
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimenionlec
Organic
Solubility
in
Diffuzivity
in
Air
Diffmivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Carbon
Order
Water
(S)
Water-
Constant
(H’)
Paffition
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg!L)
em
2
,1s
Geef14ci
Getai
Eee
YlEg
95
48
7
2
Methylphenol
(o
creGofl
24000
0.0740
8.30E
6
O0O49
9-1-2
0049
91
20
3
Nephtha1ee
O059
7.50E
6
00W8
Q0Q
0.0027
98
95
3
N4rebeefte
0,0760
8.60E
6
0000984
64,6
0.00
176
8640-6
N
Nitrocodiphenylamine
354
0.0312
6.35E
6
0000205
4-200
0,04
621
61
7
N
Nioodi
n
propylamine
9890
0.0515
8.17E
6
0.0000923
24,0
0.0019
87
86
5
Pentachlorophenol
1-950
0.0560
6.IOE
6
000004
592
0045
108
95
2
Phenol
82800
0.0820
0,4-G&-6
0.0000163
284
0,099
1918
02
1
Picloram
420
0.0255
5.28E
6
0.00000000166
-148
No
Data
1336
36
3
Polychlorinatedbiphenyls
04
—
a
309009
Ne-Data
(PC&)
129
00
0
Pyreee
0436
0.0272
7.24E
6
0.000151
105,000
0,000-1-8
122
31
9
Simazine
S
0,02-7
7.36E
6
0.0000000133
1-33-
No
Data
100
42
5
Styreae
3-1-0
0.0710
8.OOE
6
044
0.0033
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Q
First
Solubillty-ifi
Diffuivity
in
Air
Diffusivity
in
Heny!baw
Ordef
Water
(S)
Water
(D)
Constant
(H)
Partition
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(e/s
eeff1€ie+
oa+t
K
0
b4Egi
44
93
72
1
2,4,5
TP
(Silvex)
3-1-
0.0191
5.83E
6
0000003-a
5-440
No
Data
127
18
4
Teftachioroethylene
200
0-0720
8.20E
6
4-54-
0-430096
4-0848-3-
Pekiefte
4-26
0.0
870
8.60E
6
0472
4-82
0-0-14
8001
35
2
Toxaphene
04
0-0-1-1-6
4.34E
6
0-000246
257,000
No
Data
120
82
1
1,2,4
Trichlorobenzene
300
0.0300
8.23E
6
0-0582
1-3-7-80
0.0019
71
55
6
1,1,1
Trichloroethane
4-33-o
0.0780
40E-6
005
1-1-0
0.0013
79005
4--l
,2-Thchloreethane
4420
0.0780
8-80E-6
44-0374
4-04
0-00094-
79
0-1—6
Th1ereethylee
4-3-1-00
0.0790
9.1
OE
6
0-422
4-66
0.00012
95—95-4
2,4,5
Trichlorophenol
45200
0-0201-
7.03E
6
0.000178
4600
0.00038
8-8-064
2,4,6
Trichlorophenol
8430
0.0318
6.25E
6
0-00034-9
3-84
0,00038
108054
Vinyl
Acetate
20,000
0.0850
9.20E
6
0-4324-
544-
No
Data
57
01
4
Vinyl
Chloride
2?60
04-06
1.23E
6
-1-44
1-8-6
000024
108383
mXylene
4-64
0-0-743
7.80E6
0404-
403
0.0019
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Ofgaie
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
in
Air
Diffusivity
in
Henrys
Law
Carbon
Ofdef
Watef-(S)
(Di)
Watei-(D)
1afttion
Degradation
CAS
No.
Che+iiieal
(mg/L)
(ems)
(€is)
Coefficient
Constant
EKOC)
E)
(b44g)
(44)
95
47
6
o-Xy1e*e
47g
1
.00E
5
O,24-
106
‘12
3
p
Xylene
4-8
0.0769
8ME
6
0344
0.0019
1330
20
7
Xy1eiies-(eta1)
1-ge
0.0720
9.34E
6
04&
260
0.0019
Chemical
Abstracts
Service
(CAS)
registry
number.
This
number
in
the
foat
xxx
xx
x,
is
unique
for
each
chemical
and
allows
efficient
searching
on
computerized
data
bases.
Soi1
Remediation
objectives
are
deteined
oursuant
AO
CD
71
as
incomorated
P72’)
10,1
(+T,.
T
TPD
A
“DflD
Spill
Cleanup
D,-1
,‘
f
,,,,
,.+,,-..
(Source:
Amended
at
,..-..-.,,,1÷.4÷1,
t?(T
.-.;i
‘.“,
1
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
ftt
Yppi
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mgIL)
(cm2/s)
(cm2ls)
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
n1’l1
LI
L2
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
Neutral
Organics
83-32-9
Acenaphthene
3.60E+00
4.76E-02
7.69E-06
6.60E-03
b
6.30E+03
3.40E-03
2.50E03
67-64-1
Acetone
1.OOE+06
l.24E-01
l.14E-05
1.60E-03
9.73E-04
7.80E-01
4.95E-02
2.30E+02
15972-60-8
Alachlor
2.40E+02
2.l3E-02
5.28E-06
3.40E-06
b
3.20E+03
No
Data
2.20E-05
116-06-3
Aldicarb
6.03E+03
3.18E-02
7.24E-06
5.90E-08
b
l.29E+01
l.09E-03
3.47E-05
309-00-2
Aldrin
1.70E-02
l.96E-02
4.86E-06
7.OOE-03
b
2.50E+05
5.90E-04
6.OOE-06
120-12-7
Anthracene
4.30E-02
3.85E-02
7.74E-06
2.70E-03
b
2.50E+04
7.50E-04
2.70E-06
1912-24-9
Atrazine
7.OOE+01
2.59E-02
6.67E-06
9.68E-08
b
3.63E+02
No
Data
2.70E-07
71-43-2
Benzene
1.80E+03
8.80E-02
l.02E-05
2.30E-01
l.34B-01
5.OOE+01
9.OOE-04
9.50E+01
56-55-3
Benzo(a)anthracene
9.40E-03
5.IOE-02
9.00E-06
l.39E-04
b
4.OOE+05
5.10E-04
l.lOE-07
205-99-2
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
1.50E-03
2.23E-02
5.56E-06
4.55E-03
b
l.05E+06
5.70E-04
5.OOE-07
207-08-9
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
8.OOE-04
2.23E-02
5.56E-06
3.40E-05
b
1.OOE+06
l.60E-04
2.OOE-09
65-85-0
Benzoic
Acid
3.40E+03
7.02E-02
7.97E-06
l.56E-06
b
1.21E+OOd
No
Data
7.OOE-04
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
t
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D)
Constant
(H)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mgIL)
(cm2/s)
(cm2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
(LC)
Constant
(mn/Hg)
tiLkg
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
50-32-8
Benzo(a)pyrene
1.60E-03
4.30E-02
9.49E-06
4.50E-05
b
7.90E+05
6.50E-04
5.50E-09
111-44-4
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether
1.72E+04
4.13E-02
7.53E-06
7.40E-04
2.94E-04
1.26E+01
1.90E-03
1.55E+00
117-81-7
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
3.40E-01
3.51
E-02
3.66E-06
4.1
OE-06
b
1
.00E+05
I
.80E-03
6.80E-08
75-27-4
Bromodichioromethane
6.70E+03
5.61E-02
1.06E-05
6.60E-02
3.71E-02
5.OOE+01
No
Data
5.OOE+01
75-25-2
Bromoform
3.IOE+03
1.49E-02
l.03E-05
2.l9E-02
1.06E-02
9.12E+0l
1.90E-03
5.51E+00
71-36-3
Butanol
7.40E+04
8.OOE-02
9.30E-06
3.61E-04
1.55E-04
6.OOB+00
1.28E-02
7.OOE+00
78-93-3
2-Butanone
(MEK)
2.20E+05
8.08E-02
9.8E-06
2.30E-03
1.32E-03
2.OOE+00
4.95E-02
9.50E+0I
85-68-7
ButylBenzylPhthalate
2.70E+00
1.99E-02
4.89E-06
5.30E-05
b
6.30E±04
3.85E-03
8.30E-06
86-74-8
Carbazole
1.20E+00
4.17E-02
7.45E-06
3.60E-06
b
4.OOE+03
No
Data
7.OOE-04
1563-66-2
Carbofuran
3.20E+02
2.37E-02
5.95E-06
1.27E-07
b
1.91E+02
No
Data
4.85E-06
75-15-0
Carbon
Disulfide
1.20E+03
1.04E-01
1.OOE-05
1.23E+00
8.06E-01
6.30E+01
No
Data
3,60E+02
56-23-5
Carbon
Tetrachloride
7.90E+02
7.80E-02
8.80E-06
1.23E+00
7.48E-01
2.OOE+02
I.90E-03
1.20E+02
57-74-9
Chlordane
5.60E-02
1.79E-02
4.37E-06
2.OOE-03
b
2.50E+05
2.50E-04
9.80E-06
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
First
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Difflisivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(cm2ls)
(cm2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
(L
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
106-47-8
p-Chloroaniline
5.30E+03
6.99E-02
1.OIE-05
4.76E-05
b
6.31E+0l
No
Data
1.23E-02
108-90-7
Chlorobenzene
4.70E+02
7.30E-02
8.70E-06
1.50E-01
7.93E-02
2.OOE+02
2.30E-03
1.20E+01
124-48-1
Chiorodibromomethane
2.60E+03
3.66E-02
L05E-05
3.20E-02
2.07E-02
6.92E+0l
3.85E-03
4.90E+00
67-66-3
Chloroform
7.90E+03
1.04E-Ol
l.OOE-05
l.50E-0l
9.18E-02
5.OOE+01
3.90E-04
2.OOE-1-02
95-57-8
2-Chiorophenol
2.20E+05
6.61E-02
9.46E-06
1.60E-02
7.28E-03
5.93E+Old
No
Data
2.34E+00
218-01-9
Chrysene
6.30E-03
2.44E-02
6.21E-06
3.90E-03
b
4.OOE+05
3.50E04
6.20E09
94-75-7
6.77E+02
5.88E-02
6.49E-06
4.18E-07
b
5.75E+02
3.85E-03
6.OOE-07
72-54-8
4,4’-DDD
9.OOE-02
2.27E-02
5.79E-06
l.60E-04
b
7.90E+05
6.20E-05
6.70E-07
72-55-9
4,4-DDE
l.20E-01
2.38E-02
5.87E-06
8.60E-04
b
4.OOE+05
6.20E-05
6.OOE-06
50-29-3
4,4’-DDT
2.50E-02
1.99E-02
4.95E-06
3.30E-04
b
2.OOE+06
6.20E-05
1.60E-07
75-99-0
Dalapon
9.OOE+05
6.08E-02
9.45E-06
2.64E-06
4.80E+00
5.78E-03
l.90E-01
53-70-3
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
2.50E-03
2.1
lE-02
5.24E-06
6.lOE-07
b
2.50E+06
3.70E-04
1.OOE-10
96-12-8
1,2-Dibromo-3-
1.20E+03
2.68E-02
7.02E-06
6.20E03c
NA
7.90E+0l
l.93E-03
5.80E-0l
chioropropane
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
First
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Qr
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mgIL)
(cm2/s)
(cm2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
106-93-4
1,2-Dibromoethane
4.OOE+03
4.37E-02
8.44E-06
3.OOE-02
l.54E-02
5.OOE+0l
5.78E-03
l.30E+0l
84-74-2
Di-n-butyl
Phthalate
l.IOE+0l
4.38E-02
7.86E-06
7.40E-05
b
4.00E+04
3.O1E-02
7.30E-05
1918-00-9
Dicamba
4.50E+03
2.37E-02
5.95E-06
2.18E-09
b
2.95E+00
No
Data
3.38E-05
95-50-1
l,2-Dichlorobenzene
l.56E+02
6.90E-02
7.90F-06
7.79E-02
3.56E-02
5.75E+02
1.90E-03
l.36E+00
106-46-7
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
7.90E+0l
6.90E-02
7.90E-06
9.80E-02
4.69E-02
7.90E+02
l.90E-03
1.OOE+00
91-94-1
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
3.IOE+00
2.59E-02
6.74E-06
l.60E-07
b
2.82E+03
l.90F-03
3.71E-08
75-71-8
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2.80E+02
7.60E-02
l.08E-05
l.41E+01
8.14E+00
6.17E+0l
l.92E-03
4.85E+03
75-34-3
1,1-Dichioroethane
5.1OE+03
7.42E-02
LOSE-OS
2.30E-01
1.42E-0l
3.20E+0l
1.90E-03
2.30E+02
107-06-2
1,2-Dichioroethane
8.50E+03
1.04E-02
9.90E-06
4.OOE-02
2.29E-02
2.OOE+01
1.90E-03
7.90E+0l
75-35-4
1,1
-Dichloroethylene
2.30E+03
9.OOE-02
1
.04E-05
1.1
OE+00
7.1
OE-0
I
5.OOE+0i
5.30E-03
6.OOE+02
156-59-2
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
3.50E+03
8.86E-02
1.13E-05
1.70E-01
1.OOE-01
4.OOE+01
2.40E-04
2.OOE+02
156-60-5
Trans-i
,2-Dichloroethylene
6.30E+03
7.03E-02
1.1
9E-05
3
.90E-0
I
2.43E-0
I
5.OOE+0
I
2.40E-04
3
.30E+02
120-83-2
2.4-Dichlorophenol
4.50E+03
4.89E-02
8.77E-06
1.30E-04
b
7.32E+02d
2.70E-04
6.70F-02
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
First
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H)
Coefficient
Degradation
‘mm/H
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(cm
2/s)
(cm
2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
OC
Constant
g
ULk
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure_route
78-87-5
1.2-Dichioropropane
2.80E+03
7.82E-02
8.73E-06
l.IOE-0l
6.52E-02
5.OOE+0l
2.70E-04
5.20E+Ol
542-75-6
1,3-Dichloropropylene
2.80E+03
6.26E-02
l.OOE-05
7.40E-0l
3.98E-01
2.OOE+01
6.IOE-02
3.40E+0l
(cis+trans)
60-57-I
Dieldrin
2.OOE-0l
1.92E-02
4.74E-06
6.2E-04
b
2.50E+04
3.20F.-04
5.9E-06
84-66-2
Diethyl
Phthalate
l.10E+03
2.49E-02
6.35E-06
I.80E-05
b
3.20E+02
6.19E-03
1.60E-03
105-67-9
2,4-Dimethyiphenol
7.90E+03
6.43E-02
8.69E-06
8.20E-05
b
2.OOE+02
4.95E-02
9.80E-02
75-71-8
1,3-Dinitrobenzene
8.60E+02
4.55E-02
8.46E-06
2.30E-07
b
3.20E+01
l.92E-03
9.OOE-04
51-28-5
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2.79E+03
2.73E-02
9.06E-06
1.82E-05
b
3.24E+0l
l.32E-03
5.1OE-03
121-14-2
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2.70E+02
2.03E-0l
7.06E-06
3.80E-06
b
8.90E+01
1.92E-03
l.47E-04
606-20-2
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
1.82E+02
3.70E-02
7.76E-06
3.06E-05
b
4.90E+0l
l.92E-03
5.67E-04
88-85-7
Dinoseb
5.20E+01
2.45E-02
6.25E-06
I.87E-05
b
9.17E+0l’
2.82E-03
7.50E-05
117-84-0
Di-n-octyl
Phthalate
2.OOE-02
1.73E-02
4.17E-06
2.74E-03
b
l.30E+05
1.90E-03
2.60E-06
123-91-1
p-Dioxane
1.OOE+06
2.29E-01
1.02E-05
1.97E-04
1.07E-04
7.20E-01
l.92E-03
3.81E+01
115-29-7
Endosulfan
5.1OE-01
1.85E-02
4.55E-06
4.51E-04
b
5.OOE+03
7.63E-02
1.OOE-05
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARI
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
First
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D)
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(cm2/s)
(cm2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
KOCJ
Constant
(L
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
145-73-3
Endothall
2.lOE+04
2.91E-02
8.07E-06
l.58E-14
b
7.59E+0l
No
Data
l.57E-l0
72-20-8
Endrin
2.50E-01
l.92E-02
4.74E-6
3.08E-04
b
3.20E+04
3.20E-04
3.OOE-06
100-41-4
Ethylbenzene
l.70E+02
7.50E-02
7.80E-06
3.24E-0l
1.64E-01
3.20E+02
3.00E-03
9.60E+00
206-44-0
Fluoranthene
2.06E-0l
2.51E-02
6.35E-06
6.60E-04
b
7.40E+04
l.90E-04
l.23E-08
86-73-7
Fluorene
2.OOE+00
4.40E-02
7.88E-06
2.62E-03
b
l.30E+04
6.91E-04
6.30E-04
76-44-8
Heptachlor
l.80E-01
2.23E-02
5.69E-06
6.07E-02
l.73E-02
3.OOE+03
l,30E-0l
4.OOE-04
1024-57-3
Heptachlor
epoxide
2.OOE-01
2.19E-02
5.57E-06
3.90E-04
2.OOE+05
6.30E-04
1.90E-05
118-74-1
Hexachlorobenzene
6.20E-03
5
.42E-02
5.91
E-06
5
.33E-02
1
.35E-02
2.OOE+04
I
.70E-04
1.
80E-05
3
19-84-6
Alpha-HCH
(alpha-BHC)
2.OOE+00
2.04E-02
5.04E-06
4.51E-04
b
5.OOE+03
2.50E-03
4.50E-05
58-89-9
Gamma-HCH
(Lindane)
7.30E+00
2.75E-02
7.34E-06
5.74E-04
b
3.OOE+03
2.90E-03
4.IOE-04
2691-41-0
HMX
5.OOE+00
2.69E-02
7.15E-06
8.67E-10
3.55E-08
l.40E+00
No
Data
3.30E-l4
77-47-4
Hexachlorocyclo-
l.80E-i-00
2.79E-02
7.21E-06
1.1
IE+00
4.22E-01
l.20E+04
1.20E-02
5.96E-02
Pentadiene
67-72-I
Hexachloroethane
5.OOE+0l
2.50E-03
6.80E-06
1.59E-01
7.26E-02
1.50E+03
1.92E-03
2.IOE-01
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
First
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henrys
Law
Henrys
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D
Constant
(H)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mgIL)
(cm2/s)
(cm2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
(mr’Hg)
(L
For
the
indoor
Lct
inhalation
exposure
route
193-39-5
Indeno(1,2,3-c,d)pyrene
2.20E-05
2.25E-02
5.66E-06
6.5611-05
b
3.1OE+06
4.7011-04
1.OOE-10
78-59-1
Isophorone
1.2011+04
6.2311-02
6.7611-06
2.72E-04
l.12E-04
2.50E+01
1.2411-02
4.3811-01
98-82-8
Isopropylbenzene
6.lOE+01
6.50E-02
7.1OE-06
4.92E+01
2.IOE+01
1.0211+03
4.3311-02
4.50E+00
(Cumene)
93-65-2
MCPP
(Mecoprop)
8.95E+02
2.40E-02
6.05E-06
7.7011-09
b
l.
84E+Old
3.8511-03
2.44E-05
7439-97-6
Mercury
6.OOE-02
7.l4E-02
3.0111-05
4.51E-01
1.5911-01
8.70E+03
No
Data
2.OOE-03
72-43-5
Methoxychlor
4.50E-02
1.84E-02
4.46E-06
6.56E-04
5.0011+04
1.9011-03
6.00E-07
74-83-9
Methyl
Bromide
l.50E+04
7.2811-02
l.21E-05
2.5611-01
1.7911-01
1.0011+01
1.82E-02
1.62E+03
1634-04-4
Methyl
tertiary-butyl
ether
5.IOE+04
8.59E-01
1.1011-05
2.4211-02
1.50E-02
1.0011+01
1.93E-03
2.50E+02
75-09-2
Methylene
Chloride
1.3011+04
1.0111-01
1.17E-05
9.02E-02
5.70E-02
1.30E+01
1.20E-02
4.30E+02
93-65-2
2-Methylnaphthalene
2.50E+01
5.2211-02
7.75E-06
2.1OE-02
6.95E-03
1.60E+03
No
Data
6.80E-02
95-48-7
2-Methyiphenol
(o-cresol)
2.6011+04
7.40E-02
8.30E-06
4.9211-05
2.OOE-05
4.20E+Ol
4.9511-02
2.9911-01
91-20-3
Naphthalene
3.IOE+01
5.90E-02
7.50E-06
1.9711-02
8.2911-03
5.0011+02
2.70E-03
8.50E-02
98-95-3
Nitrobenzene
2.09E+03
7.60E-02
8.60E-06
9.8411-04
3.99E-04
4.00E+Ol
1.76E-03
2.40E-01
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
ji:st
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henrys
Law
Henrys
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D
Constant
(H)
Constant
(H)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(cm2/s)
(cm2/s)
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
(mm/Hg)
(L
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
86-30-6
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
3.50E+0l
2.83E-02
7.l9E-06
2.IOE-04
b
1.OOE+03
l.OOE-02
6.70E-04
621-64-7
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
9.89E+03
5.87E-02
8.17E-06
9.20E-05
5.48E-05
l.45E+0l
l.90E-03
1.30E-Ol
87-86-5
Pentachlorophenol
2.OOE+03
5.60E-02
6.1OE-06
9.84E-07
b
2.77E+03d
4.50E-04
3.20E-05
108-95-2
Phenol
8.30E+04
8.20E-02
9.1OE-06
l.64E-05
6.67E-06
2.OOE+O1
9.90E-02
280E-0l
1918-02-1
Picloram
4.30E+02
2.26E-02
5.64E-06
2.19E-12
2.00E+00
No
Data
7.21E-11
1336-36-3
Polychiorinated
biphenyls
a
a
a
a
b
a
a
a
(PCBs)
129-00-0
Pyrene
1.40E+00
2.77E-02
7.24E-06
4.51E-04
b
6.3lE+04
l.80E-04
4.60E-06
121-82-4
RDX
5.97E+01
3.llE-02
8.49E-06
2.OIE-11
b
7.20E+00
No
Data
4.IOE-09
122-34-9
Simazine
6.20E+00
2.48E-02
6.28E-06
3.80E-08
b
l.32E+02
No
Data
2.21E-08
100-42-5
Styrene
3.lOE+02
7.IOE-02
8.OOE-06
1.1IE-01
5.48E-03
3.16E+02
3.30E03
6.1OE+00
93-72-1
2,4,5-TP(Silvex)
7.IOE+01
2.30E-02
5.83E-06
3.71E-07
13
5.50E+03
No
Data
9.97E-06
127-18-4
Tetrachloroethylene
2.OOE+02
7.20E-02
8.20E-06
7.38E-0l
4.OOE-Ol
6.3lE+02
9.60E-04
1.90F+Ol
108-88-3
Toluene
5.30E+02
8.70E-02
8.60E-06
2.7lE-0l
1.49E-01
1.58E+02
1.IOE-02
2.80E+01
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
First
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffisivity
in
Henry’s
Law
Henrys
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S’)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(D
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mg/L)
(cm
2/s)
(cm
2/s)
—
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
(mm/Hg)
Lkg)
For
the
indoor
inhalation
,
exposure
route
8001-35-2
Toxaphene
7.40E-01
2.16E-02
5.51E-06
2.46E-04
b
5.O1E+04
No
Data
9.80E-07
120-82-1
1
,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
3
.50E+0
1
3
.00E-02
8.23E-06
5
.74E-02
2.38E-02
1
.58E+03
I
.90E-03
4.30E-0
I
71-55-6
1,1,1-Trichioroethane
1.30E+03
7.80E-02
8.80E-06
6.97E-01
4.21E-01
1.26E+02
1.30E-03
1.20E+02
79-00-5
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
4.40E+03
7.80E-02
8.80E-06
3.73E-02
1.98E-02
5.OIE+01
9.50E-04
2.30E+01
79-01-6
Trichioroethylene
l.50E+03
7.90E-02
9.1OE-06
4.1OE-01
2.41E-01
1.OOE+02
4.20E-04
7.30E+01
75-69-4
Trichlorofluoromethane
1.1OE+03
8.70E-02
9.70E-06
9.70E-02
3.98E+00
1.30E+02
9.63E-04
2000
95-95-4
2,4,5-Trichiorophenol
8.00E+02
2.9IE-02
7.03E-06
3.53E-04
b
2.68E+03d
3.80E-04
2.40E-02
88-06-2
2,4,6-Trichiorophenol
l.20E+03
2.61E-02
6.36E-06
1.78E-04
b
8.78E+02’
3.80E-04
2.OOE-02
108-05-4
Vinyl
Acetate
2.OOE+04
8.50E-02
9.20E-06
2.09E-02
l.l8E-02
4.57E+00
No
Data
9.OOE+01
99-35-4
1,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
2.80E+02
2.41E-02
6.08E-06
3.30E-10
b
1.60E+0I
No
Data
6.40E-06
118-96-7
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene
l.24E+02
2.94E-02
7.90E-06
4.87E-09
b
3.72E+01
l.92E-03
2.02E-06
57-01-4
Vinyl
Chloride
8.80E+03
1.06E-Ol
1.23E-06
1.1IE+00
8.14E-0l
1.58E+0l
2.40E-04
3.OOE-t03
108-38-3
m-Xylene
l.60E+02
7.OOE-02
7.80E-06
2.99E-0l
I.52E-0l
3.98E+02
l.90E-03
8.50E+00
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Dimensionless
Dimensionless
Organic
Carbon
jt
Solubility
in
Diffusivity
Diffusivity
in
Henrys
Law
Henry’s
Law
Partition
Order
Pressure
Water
(S)
in
Air
(Di)
Water
(DW
Constant
(H’)
Constant
(H’)
Coefficient
Degradation
CAS
No.
Chemical
(mgIL)
(cm2/s)
(cm2/s
—
(25°C)
(13°C)
Constant
(mm/Hg)
LiLk)
For
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route
95-47-6
o-Xylene
l.80E+02
8.70E-02
l.OOE-05
2.13E-0l
l.07E-0l
3.l6E+02
l.90E-03
6.60E+00
106-42-3
p-Xylene
l.60E+02
7.69E-02
8.44E-06
3.l6E-01
l.59E-01
3.16E+02
l.90E-03
8.90E+00
1330-20-7
Xylenes
(total)
1.lOE+02
7.35E-02
9.23E-06
2.71E-01
NA
3.98E+02
1.90E-03
8.OOE+00
Chemical
Abstracts
Service
(CAS)
registry
number.
This
number
in
the
format
xxx-xx-x,
is
unique
for
each
chemical
and
allows
efficient
searching
on
computerized
data
bases.
a
Soil
Remediation
objectives
are
determined
pursuant
to
40
CFR
761,
as
incorporated
by
reference
at
Section
732.104
(the
USEPA
‘PCB
Spill
Cleanup
Policy”.
for
most
sites;
persons
remediating
sites
should
consult
with
BOL
if
calculation
of
Tier
2
soil
remediation
obiectives
is
desired.
b
Dimensionless
Henry’s
Law
Constant
at
13°C
is
not
calculated
because
the
chemical
is
not
volatile
and
does
not
require
evaluation
under
the
indoor
inhalation
exposure
route.
°
Dimensionless
Henry’s
Law
Constant
=
20°C
d
These
chemicals
are
ionizing
and
its
Kc,.
value
will
change
with
pH.
The
K3,.
values
listed
in
this
table
is
the
effective
K,,.
at
pH
of
6.8.
If
the
site-specific
pH
is
values
other
than
6.8,
the
K0.
value
listed
in
Section
742.
Appendix
C,
Table
I
should
be
used.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
C: Tier
2
Illustrations
and Tables
Section
742.Table
F: Methods
for Determining
Physical
Soil Parameters
Methods
for
Determining
Physical
Soil
Parameters
Parameter
Sampling
Locationa
Method
ASTM
- D
1556-90
Sand
Cone
Methodb
Pb
(soil
bulk
density)
Surface
ASTM
- D
2167-94
Rubber
Balloon
Methodb
ASTM
- D
2922-9 1
Nuclear
Method’
Subsurface
ASTM
- D
2937-94
Drive
Cylinder
Method’
Ps
(soil
particle
density)
Surface
or Subsurface
ASTM
- D
854-92
Specific
Gravity
of Soil’
w (moisture
content)
Surface
or Subsurface
ASTM
- D 4959-89
(Reapproved
1994)
Standardb
ASTM
- D
4643
-93
Microwave
Oven’
ASTM
- D2216-92
Laboratory
Determination’
ASTM
-
D3017-88
(Reapproved
1993)
Nuclear
Methodb
Equivalent
USEPA
Method
(e.g.,
sample
preparation
procedures
described
in
methods
3541
or
3550)
ASTM
- D 2974-00
f
0
(fraction
organic
carbon
Surface
or Subsurface
content)
Moisture,
Ash,
and
Organic
Matter
t
’
appropriately
adjusted
to
estimate
the
fraction
of
organic
carbon
as stated
in Nelson
and
Sommers
(1982)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Methods
for Determining
Physical
Soil
Parameters
Parameter
Sampling
Locationa
Method
r or
°T
(total
soil
.
porosity)
Surface
or Subsurface
Equation
S24 in Appendix
C
Table
A for
SSL
Model
or
(calculated)
Equation
R23 in
Appendix
C,
Table
C
for
RBCA
Model,
or
Equation
J&E 16
in Appendj
Table
L
for J&E
Model
9a
or
°as
(air-filled
soil porosity)
Surface
or
Subsurface
Equation
S21
in Appendix
C,
(calculated)
Table A
for SSL
Model,
or
Equation
R21
in Appendix
C,
Table
C
for
RBCA
Model,
or
Equation
J&E
18
in Appendix
C,
Table
L for
J&E
Model
0
or
(water-filled
soil
Surface
or
Subsurface
Equation
S20 in
Appendix
C,
porosity)
(calculated)
Table
A
for
SSL Model,
or
Equation
R22
in
Appendix
C,
Table
C for
RBCA
Model,
or
Equation
J&E
17
in
Appendix
C,
Table
L
for J&E
Model
ASTM
- D 5084-90
Flexible
Wall
Permeameter
K (hydraulic
conductivity)
Surface
or Subsurface
Pump
Test
Slug
Test
i
(hydraulic
gradient)
Surface
or Subsurface
Field Measurement
a
This
is the
location
where
the sample
is
collected
b
As incorporated
by
reference
in
Section
742.120.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
H
CI)
H
CI1
C
C
C
(-)
H
C
z
0
Cl)
ci)
C’
Cl)
o
N
cc
0
Cl)
Cl)
o
c
C)
II
I.
;mmmm
mmmm
Lmmmm
hmmmiv]
h
mmmm
hWWWHW
h
WWW
I
mmmm
CID
H
o
C
H
z
CID
z
C
o
H
-Th
o
H
0
z
H
(I)
ct
mmmm
mmmm
;mmmm
mmmm
mvummm
mmmm
mmmm
mmmm
Cl)
H
C
C
H
z
C/)
zC
C
o
C.)
0
z
H
C/)
mm
mm
mm
4W44
rJ)
H
C
H
z
JD
z
C
C
H
Th
Cc)
H
C
z
(.1)
H
CO
0+
o
—
r
C
C
c
+
C
c
+
C
rfl
+
0
C)
+
C
+
C
+
0
+
0
+
0
+
C
+
0
+
0
++
0 0
+
0
+
0
+
0
C’
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
N
C
+
ci
C
+
C) N
t
- ‘0 —
r
N
00
N
0
i
N N N
N
‘D
C
00
0
C
N
00
0
o
o
N N
LP
‘Ct
—
0 N
L
cfl
—
c t
‘Ci
—
00
N
H
m
NNNNN
—
—
- —
—
—
D
‘Ci-
N
0 0 CC
00 C
00 C
0 000 0
0 00 C
00
C
CC
0+ + + +
+ + ++
+ + +
+
+ + + ++
+ +
+ +
+.+
+
..
tI
I
c.
r
tr
‘Cl-
‘Cl-
rr‘r
N -
LI
‘Cj
0
N
‘Cl-
‘Ci-
—
N
c
N C - C
00
0
N
0
00
‘Ci-
cf cfl
N —
—
0
00
N
C
—
C- 0
f-
‘Cr i’ t
i-i-t
‘Ct’Ct ‘Ci- ‘Cl’
‘Ci-
‘Ci-
‘Ci-’Cl-’Ct
(C r
CflCI
‘Cl-
N
0
CO
‘Cl- l’ ‘Ci-’Ci-’Ci-
‘Cl’’Cf
‘Ci- ‘Cl’
‘Cl’
‘Cl’
‘Ci-
CCC)
0+
C
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
CO
+ +
CCC
+ + +
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
‘
- 0
0
‘Ci-
O
N C
N
fl
‘Ci-
0 C
—
N
00
‘r
C
0
N
C
N
N
N
iC.N,0NC,oN
CO
Lr
‘Cl’
c
N
N
N
—
.—
—
—
0’
N
Lr
fl
‘Ct’
ci
c-si
CO
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
CC C
0 CC
0 00 CC
0 0 0 C
000 C
0 C
C
CC
n + + ++
+ +
+
+ + + +
+ +
+ +
+ + ++
+ +
++
+
rz
C
00 ‘t
C
00
- C C
N
N
C C
N
0
‘- N
—
C
00
N
\Q
C
tr
-
c
N N N
N NNNN
-‘ —
—
- —
—
,- —
(
m
c
NNNNNNNNNNN
N NNN
—
—
C C
0000000CC
000000CCO
COO
C
0
+ +
:i
+
:i
+ + +
+ + + + +
+
+++
+ + ++
+ +
‘I
++
+
‘D
N N
‘Cl’
—
C
—
0 —
C’
‘Cl-
m
N
Lr
- N Q
N
C cfl
C 00
N
N
N
N -
— - - O
N
D
t’
cr
N N —
—
—
‘- —
—
c
o
0
CO
-
N NNNNNNN
N NNNNNNNNNNNN
N
NN
000000000000000
_+ +
+
+ + +
+ + + + + +
+ + +
+ + ++
+ +
++
+
0
QC0000
0 0 0 C
00
0 O
00
C
00 0000
00
00 0000
N N Q
00 00000000
‘I
‘Ci- N
C
00
N
‘Cl’
N
C
NC’
0
CC
i-
N r
N
c
NN NN N
NN NN N
N NNNNNNN
N NN
r
z—
‘Ci
N
0
—
——
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
——
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
- 00000000000000000000000
C
+
+ ++ +
+
+ + + +
+ +
++ +
++ +
+ +
+
++
+
c1
N N N
N N —
—
C C
Q-
00
N
Lfl
C 0 \0
0 C \0 ‘-0
“0 C 0
Q 0
ti I
c1
-
.
—
—
—
—
—
— 0 C C
00000
0 C
000 C
0
0
0
0
•Ci
0 000000
0 00 C 000
0 0
00 CC
0
0
C
C
.9
+ +
j:i
+ + + + + +
+ + + + +
+ +
+
+
++ +
+
++
+
0
0 \0 D
00 Lr V
‘Ct’
0 —
C
00
rfl
C - C
N
00
N
00
—
\C —
N ‘CtN CNm—
N C’-Q
N
CO
N N —
- -
—
00
N Q
Lr
‘Ct
r c
N NN —
‘—
—
—
—
.—
.- ,_
Q N 00Q0-
N
C’Ci-
D
N00
CC
NC ‘C
N00
‘C
‘Ci-
‘Ci-
‘Cl’
L()
Lfl
Lf
Lt
It
‘.0
‘.Q
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
H
c)
H
C
H
z
CD
z
C
o
CL)
H
C
z
C
0
‘1)
-
6
c
c c’
C
CCC
CCCCCC
C
C C
CCCCCC
C
0+
++
++++++
+ +++
+
+ + ++
++
++
0
C
N
‘.0
‘.0
N
Lfl
r N
N
rfl ‘.0
C
L4
N
0
N
- N —
—
Lr
C
‘.0
‘)
00
‘.0
C
N -
—
0 0 0
C
C
C
NNj
‘.0
r
N
0
a)
-
C C
C C
r
C C
C
m
C
N
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
C
N N
C
C
N
C
N
0
N
N
C
N
C
N
C
0+ ++++++
+ ++++
+
+ + ++++++
+
N
‘.0 — ‘.0
‘1-
t-
II
N
Lr
II
m Q C r
N 0
II
C
Lr
C
N
N
—
C ‘.0
0
N
—
‘
‘.0
C
.—
00
‘.0
C’
—
C
L,
r
N
0
.
C
c
0+
C C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
++
C
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
++
C
çz
LXT
-j
—
00
—
Lt
C
‘.0
N C
00
‘.0
V
N N N —
—
—
—
C
NNNNN
N NN
N NNNNN
N
NNNNNNN
—
* —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
——
—
—
—
—
*
o
CC000
CCC
CCC
CC
CCCC
C
CCCC
+ +
+
+ + +++
+
+
+
++
+ ++
+ + +
+
++
II
II
m
NNNNNN
N NN
N NN
N
NNN
—
—
—
———
—
—
—
—
* —
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
0
C
C CCCCC
C CCC
CCCCC
CCC
CCC
+
+ + + +
+ + + +
+ + +
+++
+ +
+ + +
++
0
C
f1
Lfl
Q
—
00
z:
C
‘0
‘.r
ji
00
00
1- N
0
N
‘.0
zi
Lr
‘J
m
N
0000
N N N N ‘.0
‘.0
‘.Q
‘.0
‘0
\Q
‘.0
‘.0
‘.Q
‘.0
‘0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.
N NN N NNN
N
NNNN
NN
NNNNN
—
—
—
C C CCCC
C
C CC
C C C
CC CCC
CCCC
_+ ++++
+ +++
+ ++
+++
+++++
++
00 —
‘-‘ 00
—
C
I ‘.0
tr —
‘.0
N C
00
C
‘.0
r
‘.0 —
—
N
N
‘0
‘.0
‘.0
‘.0
m
N N —
—
.
—
C
00
‘.0
N
0
a)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
CC
C C C
C C CCC
CC
C CCCC
C
C
CCC
+++++
+
++
++ +
+ + ++
++++
+ ++
C
N Cf
00
N
Lr
V
—
‘.0
LP
C m
N C
N
N
C
‘.0
‘(
N
I-
tr
tt
N
N N -
c
d
C.)
CC
C
C
CC CC CC
CC
C
C C
C C
C
CC CC
CC CC CC
CC
0
C
CC
CC C
C
C
C
CC
CC
+
+ +++
+ +++
+ ++
++
++ +++
+++
.
:i:
j:i
0 00
N
-
C
00
N N ‘.0
‘.0
Lr
L4
V
1. ‘-
——000000000C00000C0C
a)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
‘
—
—
‘‘
—
—
—
—
‘
—
—
—
—
jC
C
V
‘0
N
00
C
0
- N
Lr
‘.0
N
00
C
C
$
‘.0
N
N N N
N N N N N
N
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0
>
b
C
0
H
-
,-‘
z
CI,
C
z
C
0
C
-
0
)__;
j:i
c
-
C
()
H
-d
-
C
C))
0
-i
0
ci)
4—b
00
ci)
L)
.—
o
.—L
o
o
cj)
o’
(ID
CI)
0
H
C.,)
—
NN
N
.cc
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
+
+
+
+
+
÷
++
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
±
±+
LILI
LI-c
LIc
Li)
LI
LI
LI
LI-c
LI
V
LIL
-
-
-
—
NNN
c
CCCCCCCC
C CCC
C
CCCC
C
N
+
++
+++
++
+
+
++
+
+
+
+++
C0
C
-
rc
L
\
000
N
t
C’
C
N
N
—
—
—
N
N
N
N
N
cc
L
rL
r
L1
Li,
—
CC
CC
C
C
CCC
C
CCCCC
C
C
C
H
+
+
++
+
++
++++
++
+
+++
+
I1
I)
LI
1J.
U
U
r1
ij
U
V
c
No
0
-
C
V
\
00Cc
-
N
-
D
N
-
f
Li,
LI
Li,
Li,
L1
)
Li,
Li,
Li,
\C
\Q
\D
\Q
—
C
C CCCCCCC
LU
CC
CC
CC
C
CCCCC
C CCCC
C
00
+
+++
+
+
+
+
+
+
++
+++
+
++
[.1)
J)
OON
\D
Li,
N
-
‘CO
N
D
0
Li,
0
LI)
—
N
C
Cc
00
00
N
N
C
D
Li,
—
—
—
CCCCCCCC
99
CO
)
CD
9999
0rc
‘,O
—
)
N
N
t
CI)
N
N
N
CI)
—
-
-
N
N
CI)
Li,
\D
00
—
—
—
N
N
CI)
Li,
•-
z
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
C
C C
C
C C
C
C C
C
C
C
+++
+++
+++++
‘COO
LI
0
N
‘.C
0000
00
(T.
f.L1
+
00
+
000
N
-
\C
000
N
vc
N
C
t
—
-
N
N
N
N
N
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
LI)
Li,
N
NN
C
C
CCCC
——
99
999999999999
+
+
00L
00
00
0000
(L
C
C
t
0
C
‘-C
Cc
0
C
CI)
L(
—
Li,
-j
-\Cc—N
—NLINNC
G
CD’
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
‘—
+
+
++
÷
+
+
+
+
÷
+
++
+
+
+
++
÷
000000000000
00
11)
0000000000
L-
——C0NNV,J-rI)CI)r(--CC
rI)
rI
r
N
NN
N
N
N
NNN
NN
N
N
C’
N
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
cI)
t
t
V
fl
Li,
Li,
Li,
Li,
Lg-)
‘-C
CI)
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
‘—
+
++
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
0000000000000000000000
0000000000
N
Cc
C
Cc
—
CI)
Li,
L1
N
CI)
C
C
N
00
N
Cc
N
C)
r
-
od
N
rI)
Li,
00
C’
CI)
Li,
N
C
-
-C
CCCCCC
C
C
C
C
C
CCCCC
C
C
r
++++++++
++++
++
++
++
000000
0000
00
(i
00 i-
0000
h
C
CI)
Li,
N
Cc
-
CI)
Li,
NO
N
00
N
N
—
—
—
N
NN
N
N
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
Li,
Li,
—
N
N
N
NN
)
C C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
CCCCCCC
C
+
+
+
+
+
+
++
+
++
++
+
+
++
+
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
00
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
Lx)
LI)
LI)
LI)
00
Li)
Lx)
rI)\C00-LION
NCI)OCcNC,N\COOC,
NN
N
CI)
CI)
CI)
Li,
\C
cC’
00
Cc
—
—
N
N
CI)
cO
C
+
C
+
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
c’
C C
C
C C
C
C
C
+
+
+
+
++
+
+
+++
+++
+
+
LI)
LI)
i)
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
x)
LI)
LI)
LI)
00
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
-NJ
h
‘
-
NJ
‘
-
?
LI)
C
N
Cc
N
NNN
N
rI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
CI)
CL)
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
•‘:t
+
+
+
+
+++
+
+
++
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
LI)
Lx)
LI)
1-I)
LI.)
LI)
LI)
LI)
LI)
00
LI)
LIcLiL
Li,
cC’
C
C
cC
cC
N
N
N
LI)
N
N
Lx)
Lx)
LI)
LI)
LI)
Lx)
0000000000
NNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNN
00—
N
CI)
-
V
C
N
0000—
N
CI)
Li,
C’
Li,
Li,
Li,
LI-)
LI-)
Li,
Li,
Li-
)
LI-)
Li,
C
cC
cc
cc
cc
H
z
z
c
C
H
H
C
z
H
ct
NN
NN
NNN
N
NN
NN
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
en
,c
c
c
c
c
c’
+
+
++
+
+
+
.I-1
+
1-I
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
r-’:
+
—
+
+
NNN
N
N
NN
NN
N
N
NN
NN
N
NN
NNN
—
NNN
NN
N
NN
C
C
CCC
C
CC
N
++++
+
+
+
++
+
++++
u.
J
1J
U
00
N
00
lfl
en
lr
—
en
\
C
-
—
C
c-n
a
lf
N
00
C
—
—
—
—
N
en
N
N
NN
—
H
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
C
C
N
C
N
C
N
C
N
++
++
+
+
++
++++++++
+
I-
QNNN
N
N
00
00
00
00
00
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CCC
CC
CCCCCCCCCC
C
CC
Cl)
)
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
C
C
C
++++
+
+
++
+++
en
U
LC
i)
C1
W
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Nm—CO
,
en
—
c
N
v
N
—
C
00
N
)
ci.
en
,,
crc
-
-
en
en
en
en
N
N
N
N
N
—
—
—
—
—
—
CC
—
N
CCC
C
CCC
CC
CCCCC
+
+++++
++++
+
++
+
f-I
e)
—
C
CC)
a
a
a
a
a
\Q
Do———
N
N
en
en
crc
N
Go—
—
—
—
—
N
N
NNN
N
N
N
en
en
•-
z
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
C
C
C
C
C
+
+
+
++
+
r-
)
)
00
cr1
‘t
CO
CO
V)
lfl
C\
o
c
i-
GI
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
In
DN
00
N
en
N
—
—
—
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
C
CC
C
CC
C
CCCC
CC
C
-I-
+
+
±
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
1
1.’
IL
C
N
‘C
N
C\
N
en
crc
\D
N
DO
Cc
Cc
C
‘
a
cc
,
crc
ó
od
Cc
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
N
I
G’
CCC
C
CCCCCC
CCC
CCCCCCCCC
+
+
+++
+
+
+++
++
+
+++
+
+
+
+
‘.—w
iI
f.i
W
r.i
+
+
+
Q
C
\Q
\D
C
C
C
C
\C
D
\C
en
CCC CCC
C
CC
CC
CC
C
++
÷
++
+
++
+
++
÷
++
+
‘—Li
Lc
L)
i)
,_
Ir
CO
—
crc
CO
—
-
N
Cc
—
N
en
en
en
‘
,
‘
a,
cc,
cc,
—
—
N
N
N
en
en
en
en
-
—
—
—
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
en
en
en
en
c
CCC
CC
CCCCCCCCC
r
+
+
++
+
++
+
+
+
+
+
++
i:
i-
c,
If)
.—c
—
If)
0
00
0
Cc
N
en
Cc
Cc
en
“,
,
1,
Cl,
a
Q
N
Cc
-
—
N
(4
—
:
N
N
en
en
en
en
en
en
-
-
-
-
-
If)
CC
C
CCCCCCCCCCC
+
+
+++
+
+++
+
+
++
+
CL
LI
I)
L)
If)
Cc
N
If)
00
N
C
en
0
0
C
Cc
C
a
a
a
a
cc
cc
a
crc
N
—
—
N
en
l
00—
N
en
zt-
D
—
c
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
+
C
C
+
+
0
‘—‘
N
N
en
t
crc
Q
C
N
C
0
N
a
cc
a
a
cc
cc
a
a
.
-
.
..
-
-
-
•Ij•
-
If)
If)
ccc
C
C
C
CC
C
C
C
CCCC
CCC
C
CC
C
CC
C
-
+
+
+
++++
++
Ct
+
+
+
i)
+
+
+
I)
+
+
I)
+
+
CI
+
+
+
CCCCCc0000—-----’NNNNNenenen
N
N
N
N
N
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
en
e
en
N0O
Cc
0
—
N
ent
cr)\D
NoO
CcC—Nen
InNoo
C
‘C
‘C
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
00
00
00
00
CO
00
00
00
00
8.9
9.0
a
No
data
available
for
this
pH.
b
For
Lead,
this
value
may
be
used
up
to
a
pH
of
11.0.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
[
As
Ba
Be
Cd
Cr
(+3)
Cr
(+6)
Hg
Ni
Ag
Se
Ti
Zn
Pb
3.3E+Ol
a
a
a
a
1.1E+01
2
2
1.2E+00
l.2E+02
1.9E+03
L_____
3.3E+0l
a
a
a
a
l.OE+0l
a
a
a
1.1E+00
l.2E+02
a
1.9E+03b
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Section
742.APPENDIX
C:
Tier
2
Tables
Section
742.Table
L:
J&E
Equations
TRxAT
x365
For
carcinogenic
contaminants
RO,,dOO
air
=
J&E1
Indoor
air
remediation
ED
x
EF
x
URF
x
1000
objectives
(mg/rn
3
)
For
noncarcinogenic
=
THQ
x
AT,,
x
365
x
RfC
contaminants
ROI,jdQQraj,.
ED
x
EF
To
convert
mg/rn
3
from
parts
per
million
volume
mg
/
m3
=
ppm
x
MW
24.45
R
°jndoor-air
Soil
gas
remediation
ROsojigas
=
obiective
(mg/rn
3
)
a
Soil
remediation
ROsojigas
(o
+
Kd
X
Pb
+
X
objectives
(mg/kg)
RO
501
H-
XPb
xl000
Saturated
soil
S
x
[(Kd
X
Pb)
+
OW
+
(HTS
x
Oa
)j
concentration
(mg/kg)
Csat
J&E6a
Pb
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
PxMW
6
Soil
Vapor
Saturation
c’
=
x
10
Limitx
R
x
T
J&E6b
(mg/m3-air)
RO
0
j
1g
J&E7
Groundwater
remediation
objectives
RO
=
Hx1000
I
x
exp
Attenuation
factor
for
cases
[
D1
x
AB
x
“ii
J&E8a
where
there
is
significant
pressure
x
LT
)J
X
A
crack
Jj
difference
between
the
building
Qbld
and
the
subsurface
soil
a
=
crack
7’
Q
=
83.33
cm
3
/sec
P
1
x
A
crack
Qwg
X
LT
Q01
X
T
L
crack
ex
Q
1
xL
(Deff
xAB
(D
XAB[
Q
1
,
L
I
Deff
XAk
[
‘
crack
Attenuation
factor
Attenuation
factor
for
cases
(‘
D’
x
AB
‘
where
there
is
no
significant
pressure
difference
between
the
Qbldg
X
LT
building
and
the
subsurface
soil
a
=
QO
cm
3
/sec
[i
+1
x
AB
+
(
D
x
AB
x
LC,.UCk
J&E8b
Qbldg
x
L)
LT
x
DCeCk
A
crack
JJ
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
LT
J&E9a
Total
overall
effective
diffusion
coefficient
for
L,
/
vapor
transport
in
porous
1=1
media
for
multiple
soil
layers
(cm
2
/s)
‘I
In
Equation
J&E9a,
the
following
L.
=
LT
J&E9b
.
condition
must
be
satisfied:
j=1
Source
to
building
J&E1O
separation
(cm)
LT
D
—
LF
Effective
diffusion
N
/
D
N
I
J&Ell
coefficientfor
each
soil
=
D
—-—
l+
—--—
layer
(cm
2
/s)
2
I
\
Ti)
\.
TSIR
T,i)
Surface
area
of
enclosed
space
at
or
below
grade
For
a
slab-on-grade
building
AB
(LB
x
WB)
J&E12a
(cm2)
Surface
are
of
enclosed
space
at
or
below
grade
For
a
building
with
a
basement
AR
=
(LB
X
WB)
+
(2
X
LF
X
L
8
)
+
(2><
LF
X
WB)
J&E12b
(cm2)
Building
ventilation
rate
(
LB
x
WB
x
HB
x
ER
(cm
3
/s)
Qbldg
3600
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMEI\UMENTS
Area
of
total
cracks
(cm2)
A
crack
=
2
(LB
+
WB
)
J&E14
Effective
diffusion
r
p3.33
N
+
D
“q’
333
N
J&E15
coefficient
through
the
Deff
=
D
a,crack
wJI
w,crack
I
cracks
(cm2/s)
crack
i
2
J
I
I
2
\
T,crack
,,
\.
TS
T,crack
)
PbI
Total
porosity
Tj
=
1
—
—
J&E16
PS
Water-filled
porosity
=
J&E17
v
J
Air-filled
porosity
Oa
=
—
J&E18
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
)
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
Section
742.APPENDIX
C:
Tier
2
Tables
Section
742.Table
M:
J&E
Parameters
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
Surface
area
of
enclosed
space
cm
2
Equation J&E
I
2a
or
I
2b,
Appendix
C.
Residential
=
I
x
106
Industrial/Commercial
=
4.0
x
106
at
or
below
grade
—
Table
L
Area
of
total
cracks
cm
2
Equation
J&E
14,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Calculated
Value
AT
Averaging
time
for
carcinogens
y
SSL,
Page
2-12
Residential
=
30
AT
Averaging
time
for
noncarcinogens
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Soil
saturation
concentration
Equation
J&E
6a,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Chemical-Specific
or
Calculated
Value
“
Soil
vapor
concentration
mglm
3-air
Equation
J&E
6b,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Chemical-Specific
or
Calculated
Value
y
Effective
diffusion
coefficient
through
the
cm
2
Is
Equation
J&E
15,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Calculated
Value
cracks
D,
Diffusivity
in
air
cm
2/s
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Chemical-Specific
D
Effective
diffusion
coefficient
of
soil
layer
i
cm
2/s
Equation
J&E
1
1,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Calculated
Value
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
1
Source
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
Distance
from
ground
surface
to
top
of
Soil
Contamination
=
152.4
Psource
cm
Field
Measurement
Groundwater
Contamination
=
304.8
contamination
—
Site-Specific
DT
Total
overall
effective
diffusion
coefficient
cm
2/s
Eciuation
J&E
9a,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Calculated
Value
D
Diffusivity
in
water
cm2/s
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
Residential
=
30
ED
Exposure
duration
SSL
Page
2-
12
Industrial/Commercial
=
25
Residential
350
EF
Exposure
frequency
day/year
SSL
Page
2-12
Industrial/Commercial
=
250
Residential
=
0.53
ER
Air
exchange
rate
exchanges
per
hour
Illinois
EPA
Industrial/Commercial
=
0.93
SSL
or
Field
Measurement
f
Fraction
organic
carbon
content
gg
0.002
or
Site-Specific
Appendix
C,
Table
F
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENEMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
fsource
[
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
Slab
on
Grade
Residential
=
244
Industrial/Commercial
=
305
or
Site-Specific
iir
Height
of
building
Illinois
EPA
Basement
Residential
=
427
Industrial/Commercial
=
488
or
Site-Specific
Dimensionless
Henry’s
law
constant
at
the
Appendix
C,
Table
B
Wrs
system
(soifl
temperature
unitless
Chemical-Specific
c
1d
Soil-water
partition
coefficient
pf/g
Equation
S
19,
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Calculated
Value
K
Organic
carbon
partition
coefficient
gfg
Appendix
C,
Table
E
or
Appendix
C,
Table
I
Chemical-Specific
La
Residential
=
1000
Length
of
building
cm
Illinois
EPA
Industrial/Commercial
=
2000
Lk
Slab
thickness
cm
US
EPA,
2004
10
LF
Distance
from
ground
surface
to
bottom
of
slab
cm
US
EPA,
2004
10
(slab
on
grade)
200
(basement)
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Sbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Tier
I
or
Calculated
Value
Field
Measurement
Site-Specific
L
Thickness
of
soil
layer
i
cm
For
capillary
fringe,
USEPA,
2004
For
capillary
fringe,
17
cm
Distance
from
bottom
of
slab
to
top
of
Field
Measurement
or
Equation
J&E
10,
LT
cm
142.4
or
Site-Specific
contamination
—
Appendix
C,
Table
L
MW
Molecular
weight
g/mole
Illinois
EPA
Chemical-Specific
Total
number
of
layers
of
different
types
of
soil
vapors
migrate
through
from
source
to
building
unitless
Field
measurement
Site-Specific
(if
source
is
groundwater,
include
a
capillary
fringe
layer
of
17
cm
as
one
of
the
layers)
P
Vapor
Pressure
atm
Illinois
EPA
Chemical-Specific
Slab
on
Grade
Residential
=
3.59
x
i0
Industrial/Commercial
=
3.15
x
I
or
Site-Specific
Q
Building
ventilation
rate
cm3/s
Equation
J&E
13,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Basement
Residential
=
6.28
x
Industrial/Commercial
5.04
x
i0
or
Site-Specific
ILLiNOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Sbo1
Parameter
Units
Source
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
Zero
under
Tiers
1
and
2
US
EPA,
2004
Volumetric
flow
rate
of
soil
gas
into
the
cm3
/s
Part
742.5
05(a)(2)(D)
and
Under
Tier
3,
zero
if
LT
is
greater
than
enclosed
space
Part
742.505(b)(5)
5
feet
(152
cm)
83.33
if
LT
is
less
than
5
feet
(152
cm)
R
Ideal
gas
constant
atrn-L/mol-K
US
EPA,
2004
0.08206
RfC
Reference
concentration
Illinois
EPA
Toxicological-Specific
Appendix
B,
Table
E,
or
Equation
J&E
Chemical-Specific
Groundwater
remediation
objective
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Qindoor-air
Indoor
air
remediation
objective
mg/rn3
Equations
J&E
1-2.
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Calculated
Value
Appendix
B,
Tables
A
or
B
or
Equation
J&E
5,
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
Q01
Soil
remediation
objective
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Qsogas
Soil
gas
remediation
objective
mg/rn3
Equation
J&E
4,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Calculated
Value
Solubility
in
water
Appendix
C,
Table
E
Chemical-Specific
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Source
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
T
Temperature
K
US
EPA,
2004
286
(converted
from
1
3°C)
ThQ
Target
hazard
quotient
for
a
chemical
unitless
SSL
.
Residential
=
l0
at
the
point
of
human
Target
risk
or
the
increased
chance
of
-
SSL
exposure
TR
developing
cancer
over
a
lifetime
due
to
unitless
—
Industrial/Commercial
=
10
at
the
exposure
to
a
chemical
point
of
human
exposure
URF
Unit
risk
factor
(uglm
3)
-i
Illinois
EPA
Toxicological-
Specific
w
Floor-wall
seam
gap
cm
US
EPA,
2004
W
Moisture
content
g
of
water/g
of
soil
Field
Measurement,
Appendix
C.
Table
F
Site-Specific
Residential
=
1000
W
Width
of
building
cm
Illinois
EPA
Industrial/Commercial
=
2000
or
Site-Specific
ii
Attenuation
factor
(groundwater)
unitless
Equations
J&E
8a
or
8b,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Site-Specific
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Parameter
Air-filled
soil
porosity
Air-filled
porosity
for
soil
in
cracks
Total
porosity
for
soil
in
cracks
Water-filled
soil
porosity
Water-filled
porosity
for
soil
in
cracks
Source
Tier
1
or
Calculated
Value
Equation
J&E
18,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
0.28
or
Calculated
Value
endix
C,
Table
A
0.28
0.28
or
Calculated
Value
For
capillary
fringe,
ea
0.1
eT
Equation
S24,
Appendix
C,
Table
A
ndix
C,
Table
L
Equation
J&E
17,
Appendix
C,
Table
L
Equation
S20,
Appendix
C,
Table
A
Water-filled
porosity
of
soil
layer
i
0.43
0.43
or
Calculated
Value
0.15
or
Calculated
Value
0.15
0.15
or
Calculated
Value
For
capillary
fringe
0.3
75
or
0.9
eT.
SSL
or
Field
Measurement
1.5
or
Calculated
Value
Appendix
C,
Table
F
ILLINOIS
REGISTER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
NOTICE
OF
PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS
Symbol
Parameter
Units
Source
Tier
I
or
Calculated
Value
j
Soil
particle
density
/3
Field
Measurement,
Appendix
C,
Table
F
or
2.65
or
Calculated
Value
SSL
j
Density
of
water
Illinois
EPA
I
SSL
“Technical
Background
Document
for
Draft
Soil
Screening
Level
Framework,
Review
Draft”,
July
1994SSG
“Soil
Screening
Guidance:
User’s
Guide”
EPAI54O/R-961018,
April
1996
US
EPA,
2004a.
Users
Guide
for
Evaluating
Subsurface
Vapor
Intrusion
into
Buildings.
February
2004.
(Source:
Added
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
)
GE
)
‘3P
032008
COUNTY
OF
SANGAMON
)
co,/JN0Is
PROOF
OF
SERVICE
ard
I,
the undersigned,
on
oath
state
that
I
have
served
the
attached
Motion
for
Acceptance, Appearance
of
Attorney,
Certification
of
Origination,
Motion
for
Leave
from
Filing
Requirement,
List
of Studies
and
Reports
Used
in
Regulatory
Development,
Statement
of
Reasons,
and
the
Proposed
Amendments
upon
the
persons
to
whom
they
are
directed,
by
placing
a
copy
of each
in an
envelope
addressed
to:
Dorothy
Gunn,
Clerk
Bill
Richardson
Illinois
Pollution Control
Board
Chief
Legal
Counsel
James
R.
Thompson
Center
Illinois
Dept.
of
Natural
Resources
100
W.
Randolph,
Suite
11-500
One
Natural
Resources
Way
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Springfield,
Illinois
62702-1271
Matt
Dunn
Environmental
Bureau
Chief
Office
of
the
Attorney
General
James
R.
Thompson
Center
100
W.
Randolph,
12
th
Floor
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
and
mailing
them
(First
Class
Mail)
from
Springfield,
Illinois
on
September
2,
2008,
with
sufficient
postage
affixed
as
indicated
SUBSCRIBED
AND
SWORN TO
BEFORE
ME
This
day
of
September,
2008.
Notary Public
OFFICIAL
SEAL
BRENDA
BOEHNER
:
NOTARY
PUBliC,
STATE
OF
IWNOS
:
MY
COMMISSION
EXPIRES
11-3.2009
: