1. ORDER

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 7, 2008
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Complainant,
v.
SOUTHWIND CONSTRUCTION CORP.,
an Indiana corporation,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 07-32
(Enforcement - Water)
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by T.E. Johnson):
On November 1, 2006, the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the
State of Illinois (People), filed a four-count complaint against Lake Arlann Drainage District
(District), Cochran & Wilken, Inc. (CWI), and Southwind Construction Corp. (Southwind)
(collectively respondents). The complaint concerns alleged violations resulting from a dredging
operation to remove approximately 330,000 cubic yards of accumulated sedimentation and
siltation from Lake Arlann in Pekin, Tazewell County. In a separate stipulation, Southwind now
seeks to settle with the People without a hearing. Neither the District nor CWI is a party to this
stipulation.
1
For the reasons below, the Board accepts the parties’ stipulation and proposed
settlement.
Under the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5 (2006)), the Attorney
General and the State’s Attorneys may bring actions before the Board to enforce Illinois’
environmental requirements on behalf of the People.
See
415 ILCS 5/31 (2006); 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 103. In this case, the People allege that respondents violated Sections 12(a), (f), and 21(a)
of the Act (415 ILCS 5/12(a), (f), 21(a) (2006)) and Sections 302.203, 304.124(a), 305.102(b),
309.102(a), and 309.146(a) of the Board’s water pollution regulations (35 Ill. Adm. Code
302.203, 304.124(a), 305.102(b), 309.102(a), 309.146(a)). The People further allege that
respondents violated these provisions by (1) causing, allowing, or threatening the discharge of
suspended solids, silt, sediment, and other contaminants to waters of the State so as to cause or
tend to cause water pollution; (2) causing or allowing discharges of total suspended solids in
excess of permitted and generally applicable effluent limits; (3) failing to monitor effluent and
timely submit effluent sampling reports as required by the District’s National Pollutant
1
The caption of this order does not include the District or CWI. In a separate order issued on
July 10, 2008, the Board granted motions for hearing relief and accepted the respective
stipulations and proposed settlements involving the District and CWI.
See
People v. Lake
Arlann Drainage District, Cochran & Wilken, Inc., and Southwind Construction Corp., PCB 07-
32 (July 10, 2008). On May 16, 2008, the People had filed the two stipulations and proposed
settlements, one with the District and one with CWI, each accompanied by a request for relief
from the hearing requirement. Southwind was not a party to either of those stipulations.

 
2
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit; and (4) failing to maintain a storm water
pollution prevention plan, implement the required storm water erosion controls and interim
stabilization controls, and conduct the necessary inspections of storm water controls.
On June 25, 2008, the People and Southwind filed a stipulation and proposed settlement,
accompanied by a request for relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1) of the Act
(415 ILCS 5/31(c)(1) (2006)). This filing is authorized by Section 31(c)(2) of the Act (415 ILCS
5/31(c)(2) (2006)), which requires that the public have an opportunity to request a hearing
whenever the State and a respondent propose settling an enforcement action without a public
hearing.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(a). The Board provided notice of the stipulation,
proposed settlement, and request for relief. The newspaper notice was published in the
Pekin
Daily Times
on July 2, 2008. The Board did not receive any requests for hearing. The Board
grants the parties’ request for relief from the hearing requirement.
See
415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2)
(2006); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(b).
Section 103.302 of the Board’s procedural rules sets forth the required contents of
stipulations and proposed settlements.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.302. These requirements
include stipulating to facts on the nature, extent, and causes of the alleged violations and the
nature of a respondent’s operations. Section 103.302 also requires that the parties stipulate to
facts called for by Section 33(c) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/33(c) (2006)), which bears on the
reasonableness of the circumstances surrounding the alleged violations. The stipulation also
addresses the factors of Section 42(h) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/42(h) (2006)), which may mitigate
or aggravate the civil penalty amount. Southwind does not affirmatively admit the alleged
violations, but agrees to pay a sum of $2,500. The People and Southwind have satisfied Section
103.302. The Board accepts the stipulation and proposed settlement.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
ORDER
1.
The Board accepts and incorporates by reference the stipulation and proposed
settlement.
2.
Southwind must pay a sum of $2,500 no later than September 8, 2008, which is
the first business day following the 30th day after the date of this order.
Southwind must pay the sum by certified check or money order payable to the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, designated to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Trust Fund. The case name, case number and
Southwind’s federal tax identification number must appear on the face of the
certified check or money order.
3.
Southwind must submit payment of the $2,500 sum to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Division
1021 North Grand Avenue East

3
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
Southwind must send a copy of the certified check or money order and any
transmittal letter to:
Michael D. Mankowski
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
500 South Second Street
Springfield, Illinois 62702
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may
be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the
order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2006);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906, 102.706.
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the Illinois
Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. The
Board’s procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its final
orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill. Adm. Code
101.520;
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
I, John Therriault, Assistant Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the
Board adopted the above opinion and order on August 7, 2008, by a vote of 4-0.
___________________________________
John Therriault, Assistant Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board

Back to top