BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
PEOPLE OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
ex rel.
)
STATE’S ATTORNEY CHARLES GARNATI,
)
And THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY BOARD,
)
Petitioners,
)
v.
)
PCB No. 08-93
KIBLER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
)
(Permit Appeal - Land)
MARION RIDGE LANDFILL, INC., and
)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
)
AGENCY,
)
Respondents.
)
NOTICE
John Therriault, Acting Clerk
Carol Webb, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
1021 North Grand Avenue East
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
P.O. Box 19274
Chicago, IL 60601
Springfield, IL 62794-9274
Stephen F. Hedinger
Michael John Ruffley
Hedinger Law Officer
Assistant State’s Attorney
2601 South Fifth Street
200 Jefferson, Williamson County Courthouse
Springfield, IL 62703
Marion, IL 62959
Jennifer Sackett Pohlenz
Querrey & Harrow
75 West Jackson Boulevard
Suite 1600
Chicago, IL 60604-2827
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the office of the Clerk of the Pollution Control
Board an
REPLY TO PETITIONERS’ JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO IEPA AND
LANDFILL’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
, copies of which are herewith served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
____________________________
Melanie A. Jarvis
Assistant Counsel, Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: July 8, 2008
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, July 8, 2008
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned attorney at law, hereby certify that on July 8, 2008, I served true and correct
copies of an
REPLY TO PETITIONERS’ JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO IEPA AND
LANDFILL’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
via the Board’s COOL System and by placing true and
correct copies thereof in properly sealed and addressed envelopes and by depositing said sealed
envelopes in a U.S. Mail drop box located within Springfield, Illinois, with sufficient First Class postage
affixed thereto, upon the following named persons:
John Therriault, Acting Clerk
Carol Webb, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
1021 North Grand Avenue East
100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
P.O. Box 19274
Chicago, IL 60601
Springfield, IL 62794-9274
Stephen F. Hedinger
Michael John Ruffley
Hedinger Law Officer
Assistant State’s Attorney
2601 South Fifth Street
200 Jefferson, Williamson County Courthouse
Springfield, IL 62703
Marion, IL 62959
Jennifer Sackett Pohlenz
Querrey & Harrow
75 West Jackson Boulevard
Suite 1600
Chicago, IL 60604-2827
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
____________________________
Melanie A. Jarvis
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, July 8, 2008
BEFORE THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
PEOPLE OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
ex rel.
)
STATE’S ATTORNEY CHARLES GARNATI,
)
And THE WILLIAMSON COUNTY BOARD,
)
Petitioners,
)
v.
)
PCB No. 08-93
KIBLER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
)
(Permit Appeal - Land)
MARION RIDGE LANDFILL, INC., and
)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
)
AGENCY,
)
Respondents.
)
REPLY TO PETITIONERS’ JOINT RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO IEPA AND
LANDFILL’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
NOW COMES Respondent, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (“Illinois EPA”), by
one of its attorneys, Melanie A. Jarvis, Assistant Counsel and Special Assistant Attorney General, who
is appearing limitedly for the purpose of attacking the sufficiency of the Petition filed in this case, and
who, pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.506, hereby respectfully replies to Petitioners’ joint response to
Respondent’s Motions to Dismiss and in support of said motion, the Illinois EPA states as follows:
1.
The Illinois EPA deems it necessary to reply to Petitioners’ Joint Response in Opposition
to IEPA and Landfill’s Motions to Dismiss filed July 7, 2008.
2.
Initially, it is important, if not dispositive, to note that Petitioners fail to address the
jurisdictional and standing issues raised. Apparently, Petitioners deem it appropriate to review its
authority to seek an appeal of the issuance of an Illinois EPA permit with rational that the Office of the
Illinois Attorney General should be allowed in Circuit Court to seek a declaratory judgment action
against a person to develop a site. These two issues are not similar. The later case deals with whether
the People have standing to seek relief in circuit court based upon Administrative action, not whether the
People have standing to participate in the decision making process and seek review of the Board during
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, July 8, 2008
the administrative process. In this light, the Petitioners did not address the question of jurisdiction in
their response. As stated in Illinois EPA’s Motion to Dismiss, the Illinois Environmental Protection Act,
415 ILCS 5/1 et seq. (2006) (“Act”) does not allow for the third party appeal of the type of permit issued
in this case by the Illinois EPA. The Board, like the Illinois EPA is a creature of statute and cannot
create jurisdiction where the Act does not provide it.
3.
Moreover, the Petitioners appear to state that the Illinois EPA claimed that they could not
appeal its permit decision because it was not a party to the process. Illinois EPA did not, within its
motion, make that point, no matter how valid it is, and the Illinois EPA would reserve its right to
present argument on this issue, should the Petitioner present further arguments relating to this point.
4.
The Illinois EPA has always maintained through its filing of a limited appearance that it
was only subjecting itself to the jurisdiction of the Board for the purposes of challenging said
jurisdiction. Further, Illinois EPA should not be prejudiced by following the rules of the Board in the
filing of its Motion to Dismiss. The Board in adopting said rules obviously did not feel that a Petitioner
would be prejudiced by the filing of a motion to dismiss within the 30-day period. Petitioners’ argument
to the contrary is really the farce in this case.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated herein, the Illinois EPA respectfully requests that the Board grant the
Illinois EPA’s Motion to Dismiss based on the Board’s lack of jurisdiction or in the alternative finding
that Petitioners lack standing to bring this matter before the Board.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, July 8, 2008
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent
____________________________
Melanie A. Jarvis
Assistant Counsel
Special Assistant Attorney General
Division of Legal Counsel
1021 North Grand Avenue, East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
217/782-5544
217/782-9143 (TDD)
Dated: July 8, 2008
This filing submitted on recycled paper.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, July 8, 2008