1. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
    2. CIVIL PENALTY DUE DATE
      1. Page 3
      2. Page 4
      3. Page 5
      4. Page 6
      5. Page 7

 
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 15, 2008
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
KEN and ELLA COOK,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AC 08-11
(IEPA No. 336-07-AC)
(Administrative Citation)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
On April 22, 2008, respondents Ken and Ella Cook (respondents) filed a letter with the
Board. For the reasons below, the Board construes the letter as a motion to reconsider the
Board’s final order of March 20, 2008, and denies the motion. This administrative citation
proceeding concerns respondents’ property located at 1607 North Park in Herrin, Williamson
County. The property is commonly known to complainant, the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency (Agency), as “Herrin/Cook” and is designated with Site Code No. 1990405076.
In this order, the Board sets forth the procedural history of this case before discussing and
ruling on respondents’ motion. The Board concludes with a discussion of the date on which
payment of the $3,000 civil penalty is due.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 14, 2007, the Agency filed an administrative citation against respondents.
The citation was based on a November 15, 2007 Agency inspection of respondents’ site.
Respondents were served with the administrative citation on December 14, 2007. Respondents
did not file a petition to contest the administrative citation. Accordingly, on March 20, 2008, the
Board entered a default order against respondents, finding that respondents violated Sections
21(p)(1) and (p)(7) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1), (p)(7)
(2006)) as alleged and imposing the statutory civil penalty of $1,500 per violation, for a total
civil penalty of $3,000. The order required payment of the civil penalty by April 21, 2008, the
first business day following the 30th day after the date of the order. On April 22, 2008,
respondents filed a letter with the Board. The Agency has not filed any response to the letter.
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
In their letter filed on April 22, 2008, respondents state that they have removed various
items from the site, including metal and “vegetative waste,” and “cleaned up” certain areas.
Letter at 1. Respondents maintain that they have made “significant progress” since the Agency’s

2
site inspection, while acknowledging that they “have more that needs to be done.”
Id
. at 2.
Respondents conclude:
With reference to the civil penalty, we do not have $3,000.00, nor will money be
available by the April 21, 2008, date. Any alternatives, e.g., extended compliance
dates would be appreciated.
Id
.
The Board construes respondents’ letter as a motion to reconsider the Board’s final order
of March 20, 2008. Any motion to reconsider was due to be filed within 35 days after receipt of
the Board’s March 20, 2008 final order.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.520(a). Respondents’ letter,
filed April 22, 2008, was therefore timely filed.
A motion to reconsider may be brought “to bring to the [Board’s] attention newly
discovered evidence which was not available at the time of the hearing, changes in the law or
errors in the [Board’s] previous application of existing law.” Citizens Against Regional Landfill
v. County Board of Whiteside County, PCB 92-156, slip op. at 2 (Mar. 11, 1993), citing
Korogluyan v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill. App. 3d 622, 627, 572 N.E.2d 1154, 1158 (1st
Dist. 1991);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902. In addition, a motion to reconsider may specify
“facts in the record which were overlooked.” Wei Enterprises v. IEPA, PCB 04-23, slip op. at 3
(Feb. 19, 2004).
As explained below, because respondents failed to timely contest the administrative
citation, the Board, in its order of March 20, 2008, was required by the Act to find that
respondents committed the violations alleged by the Agency. Having found the violations, the
Board was required by the Act to impose the corresponding statutory penalty on respondents.
Respondents’ subsequent cleanup is not a defense, and the Act affords the Board no discretion to
take any potentially mitigating circumstances into account to reduce an administrative citation
penalty.
The Board stated in its March 20, 2008 order that to contest an administrative citation, a
respondent must file a petition with the Board no later than 35 days after being served with the
administrative citation. If the respondent fails to do so, the Act requires the Board to find that
the respondent committed the violation alleged and impose the corresponding civil penalty. The
Act states:
If the person named in the administrative citation fails to petition the Board for
review within 35 days from the date of service, the Board shall adopt a final
order, which shall include the administrative citation and findings of violation as
alleged in the citation, and shall impose the penalty specified in subdivision (b)(4)
or (b)(4-5) of Section 42. 415 ILCS 31.1(d)(1) (2006);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code
101.300(b), 108.204(b), 108.406.
In this case, the Agency alleged that respondents violated Sections 21(p)(1) and (p)(7) of
the Act (415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1), (p)(7) (2006)) by causing or allowing the open dumping of waste
in a manner resulting in litter and the deposition of general or clean construction or demolition
debris. Any petition for review was due by January 18, 2008. Respondents failed to timely file a

 
3
petition. The Board therefore found in its March 20, 2008 order that respondents violated
Sections 21(p)(1) and (p)(7) of the Act on November 15, 2007, the date of the Agency inspection
of respondents’ site.
Section 42(b)(4-5) of the Act states that the civil penalty for violating any provision of
subsection (p) of Section 21 is $1,500 for each violation, except that the penalty amount is
$3,000 for each violation that is the person’s second or subsequent adjudicated violation of that
provision.
See
415 ILCS 5/42(b)(4-5) (2006); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500(a). Here, because
there were two violations of Section 21(p) and no allegations of any second or subsequent
adjudicated violations, the Board was required by the Act to impose a total civil penalty of
$3,000 on respondents.
A cleanup performed by a respondent after the Agency site inspection is generally
without legal significance in an administrative citation action for open dumping.
See
IEPA v.
Jack Wright, AC 89-227, slip op. at 7 (Aug. 30, 1990) (“The Act, by its terms, does not envision
a properly issued administrative citation being dismissed or mitigated because a person is
cooperative or voluntarily cleans-up the site”). In short, respondents’ subsequent cleanup,
however laudable, is neither a defense to these violations nor relevant to determining the civil
penalty amount.
When the Board finds a violation in an enforcement action brought under Section 31 of
the Act, the Board has the discretion to impose a penalty and if the Board decides to impose one,
the Board may consider factors that mitigate the amount of penalty.
See
415 ILCS 5/31, 33(c),
42(h) (2006). The Board has no such discretion after finding a violation in an administrative
citation action brought under Section 31.1 of the Act.
See
Miller v. PCB, 267 Ill. App. 3d 160,
167, 642 N.E.2d 475, 482 (4th Dist. 1994). Accordingly, the Board was statutorily required to
impose a civil penalty on respondents and, further, the amount of that penalty, $3,000, is fixed by
the Act.
The Board finds that respondents’ motion fails to identify any newly-discovered
evidence, changes in the law, errors in the Board’s application of the law, or overlooked facts in
the record. The Board therefore denies respondents’ motion to reconsider.
CIVIL PENALTY DUE DATE
Under the Board’s procedural rules, a “timely-filed motion for reconsideration . . . stays
the effect of the final order until final disposition of the motion.” 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.520(c).
Accordingly, the Board’s March 20, 2008 order was stayed with the timely filing of respondents’
motion to reconsider. By that same rule, today’s denial of the motion to reconsider lifts the stay.
Accordingly, to the extent respondents’ have not already paid the civil penalty, respondents’
must pay the civil penalty of $3,000 no later than June 16, 2008, which is the first business day
following the 30th day after the date of today’s order. The terms of the Board’s March 20, 2008
order are otherwise unchanged.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may
be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the
order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2006);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906, 102.706.
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the Illinois
Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. The
Board’s procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its final
orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill. Adm. Code
101.520;
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
I, John Therriault, Assistant Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the
Board adopted the above order on May 15, 2008, by a vote of 4-0.
___________________________________
John Therriault, Assistant Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board

 
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
AC Og
(IEPA No. 336-07-AC)
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION
Receg
CLERKS OFFICE
vect
DEC 1
4
2007
Pollution
STATE
Control
OF
ILLINOIS
Board
KEN and ELLA COOK,
Respondents.
JURISDICTION
This Administrative Citation is issued pursuant to the authority vested in the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency by Section 31.1 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, 415
ILCS 5/31.1 (2006).
FACTS
1.
That Ken and Ella Cook are the present owners ("Respondents") of a facility
located at 1607 North Park in Herrin, Williamson County, Illinois. The property is commonly
known to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency as Herrin/Cook.
2.
That said facility is an open dump operating without an Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency Operating Permit and is designated with Site Code No. 1990405076.
3.
That Respondents have owned said facility at all times pertinent hereto.
4.
That on November 15, 2007, Phillip Fatka of the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency's Marion Regional Office inspected the above-described facility. A copy of his inspection
report setting forth the results of said inspection is attached hereto and made a part hereof.
1

 
VIOLATIONS
Based upon direct observations made by Phillip Fatka during the course of his November 15,
2007 inspection of the above-named facility, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency has
determined that Respondents have violated the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (hereinafter,
the "Act") as follows:
(1)
That Respondents caused or allowed the open dumping of waste in a manner
resulting in litter, a violation of Section 21(p)(1) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5121(p)(1)
(2006).
(2)
That Respondents caused or allowed the open dumping of waste in a manner
resulting in deposition of general construction or demolition debris or clean
construction or demolition debris, a violation of Section 21(p)(7) of the Act, 415
ILCS 5/210)(7) (2006).
CIVIL PENALTY
Pursuant to Section 42(b)(4-5) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/42(b)(4-5) (2006), Respondents are
subject to a civil penalty of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($1,500.00) for each of the
violations identified above, for a total of Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000.00). If Respondents elect
not to petition the Illinois Pollution Control Board, the statutory civil penalty specified above shall be
due and payable no later than January 31, 2008, unless otherwise provided by order of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board.
If Respondents elect to contest this Administrative Citation by petitioning the Illinois Pollution
Control Board in accordance with Section 31.1 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/31.1 (2006), and if the Illinois
Pollution Control Board issues a finding of violation as alleged herein, after an adjudicatory hearing,
2

 
Respondents shall be assessed the associated hearing costs incurred by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency and the Illinois Pollution Control Board. Those hearing costs shall be assessed
in addition to the One Thousand Five Hundred Dollar ($1,500.00) statutory civil penalty for each
violation.
Pursuant to Section 31.1(d)(1) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/31.1(d)(1) (2006), if Respondents fail
to petition or elect not to petition the Illinois Pollution Control Board for review of this Administrative
Citation within thirty-five (35) days of the date of service, the Illinois Pollution Control Board shall
adopt a final order, which shall include this Administrative Citation and findings of violation as
alleged herein, and shall impose the statutory civil penalty specified above.
When payment is made, Respondents' check shall be made payable to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Trust Fund and mailed to the attention of Fiscal Services, Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, 1021North Grand Avenue East, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276. Along with payment, Respondents shall complete and return the enclosed
Remittance Form to ensure proper documentation of payment.
If any civil penalty and/or hearing costs are not paid within the time prescribed by order of the
Illinois Pollution Control Board, interest on said penalty and/or hearing costs shall be assessed
against the Respondents from the date payment is due up to and including the date that payment is
received. The Office of the Illinois Attorney General may be requested to initiate proceedings
against Respondents in Circuit Court to collect said penalty and/or hearing costs, plus any interest
accrued.
3

 
PROCEDURE FOR CONTESTING THIS
ADMINISTRATIVE CITATION
Respondents have the right to contest this Administrative Citation pursuant to and in
accordance with Section 31.1 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/31/1 (2006). If Respondents elect to contest
this Administrative Citation, then Respondents shall file a signed Petition for Review, including a
Notice of Filing, Certificate of Service, and Notice of Appearance, with the Clerk of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board, State of Illinois Center, 100 West Randolph, Suite 11-500, Chicago, Illinois
60601. A copy of said Petition for Review shall be filed with the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency's Division of Legal Counsel at 1021 North Grand Avenue East, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276. Section 31.1 of the Act provides that any Petition for Review shall be filed within
thirty-five (35) days of the date of service of this Administrative Citation or the Illinois Pollution
Control Board shall enter a default judgment against the Respondent.
ELe-ict*
Date:?
k
?
10 1
Illinois Environmental Protectioi'Agency
Douglas . Scott, Director
Prepared by:
Susan E. Konzelmann, Legal Assistant
Division of Legal Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
4

 
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY, ()
R
Complainant,
REMITTANCE FORM
b
Re
CLE 'S
R
OFFICE
IVED
DEC 1
4
2007
Pollution
S
TATE OF
Control
ILLINOIS
Board
AC
v.
?
(IEPA No. 336-07-AC)
KEN and ELLA COOK,
Respondents.
FACILITY:
?
Herrin/Cook
COUNTY:?
Williamson
DATE OF INSPECTION:
?
November 15, 2007
SITE CODE NO.:
?
1990405076
CIVIL PENALTY:
?
$3,000.00
DATE REMITTED:
SS/FEIN NUMBER:
SIGNATURE:
NOTE
Please enter the date of your remittance, your Social Security number (SS) if an individual or
Federal Employer Identification Number (FEIN) if a corporation, and sign this Remittance Form. Be
sure your check is enclosed and mail, along with Remittance Form, to Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, Attn.: Fiscal Services, P.O. Box 19276, Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276.
5

Back to top