ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 12, 2007
FOX MORAINE, LLC,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED CITY OF YORKVILLE, CITY
COUNCIL
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
PCB 07-146
(Pollution Control Facility
Siting Appeal)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
On June 27, 2007, Fox Moraine, LLC (petitioner) timely filed a petition asking the Board
to review a May 24, 2007 decision of United City of Yorkville City Council (Yorkville).
Yorkville’s decision concerns petitioner’s proposed siting of a pollution control facility in
Yorkville, Kendall County. For the reasons below, the Board accepts petitioner’s petition for
hearing.
Under the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/1
et seq.
(2006)), before the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency can issue a permit to develop or construct a new or
expanding pollution control facility, the permit applicant must obtain siting approval for the
proposed facility from the local government (
i.e.
, the county board if in an unincorporated area
or the governing body of the municipality if in an incorporated area). If the local government
denies siting or approves siting with conditions, the siting applicant may appeal the local
government’s decision to the Board.
See
415 ILCS 5/39(c), 40.1(a) (2006); 35 Ill. Adm. Code
107.
In this case, Yorkville denied petitioner’s application to site a pollution control facility in
Yorkville. Petitioner appeals on the grounds that Yorkville’s decision was fundamentally unfair
and the findings on criteria i, ii, iii, v, vi, vii, and ix (
see
415 ILCS 5/39.2 (2006)) were against
the manifest weight of the evidence. Petitioner’s petition meets the content requirements of 35
Ill. Adm. Code 107.208.
The Board accepts the petition for hearing. Petitioner has the burden of proof. 415 ILCS
5/40.1(a) (2006);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 105.506. Hearings will be based exclusively on the
record before Yorkville. Accordingly, though the Board hearing affords petitioner the
opportunity to challenge the local government’s reasons for its decision, information developed
after the local government’s decision typically is not admitted at hearing or considered by the
Board. However, if relevant, evidence may be introduced on (1) the local government’s
jurisdiction over the siting application and (2) the fundamental fairness of the procedures used by
the local government in reaching its decision.
See
415 ILCS 5/40.1(a) (2006); Land & Lakes v.
PCB, 319 Ill. App. 3d 41, 48, 743 N.E.2d 188, 194 (3d Dist. 2000).
2
Hearings will be scheduled and completed in a timely manner, consistent with the
decision deadline (
see
415 ILCS 5/40.1(a) (2006)), which only petitioner may extend by waiver
(
see
35 Ill. Adm. Code 107.504; 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.308). If the Board fails to take final
action by the decision deadline, the petitioner “may deem the site location approved.” 415 ILCS
5/40.1(a) (2006). Currently, the decision deadline is October 25, 2007 (the 120th day after June
27, 2007).
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 107.504. The Board meeting immediately before the decision
deadline is scheduled for October 18, 2007.
Yorkville must file the entire record of its proceedings within 21 days after the date of
this order.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 107.302. The record must comply with the content and
certification requirements of 35 Ill. Adm. Code 107.304, 107.308. Petitioner must pay to
Yorkville the cost of preparing and certifying the record.
See
415 ILCS 5/39.2(n) (2006); 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 107.306, 107.502(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, John T. Therriault, Assistant Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that
the Board adopted the above order on July 12, 2007, by a vote of 4-0.
___________________________________
John T. Therriault, Assistant Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board