President
STEVE
RockfordRock
River
.
(
IllinoisWater
;RAC
Reclamation
EFTA
District
Vice President-Administrator
CLIFF WHITE
City
5t Charlesof
St Charles
. Was
Vice President - Technical
BRIAN
GurneeNorth
Shore
. Illinois
DORN
Sanitary Distict
Member-al-Large
MIKE
UrbanaUrbana
.
&
LIII'LE
IllinoisChampaign
Sanitary District
Member-at-Large
NI('K
Ikr,cncn(n
MENNINGAo
Sunilurs IJisl 'I
Uo,rncn (hr,yc, Illinois
Idei at Large
TOM MU rH
Us,vego,
Fox Metro
IllinoisWater
Rmlumution District
Member-al-1-urge
City
DENNISSTREICHER
Elmhurst,
of ElmhurstIllinois
Ex-Otiia
STEVE DAVIS
The Galesburg Sanitary District
Galesburg, Illinois
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC
Clerk's
#109 *
Office,
* * * * *
April
*
24, 2007
Illinois Association of Wastewater Agencies
241
SPRINGFIELD,
NORTH FIFTH
ILLINOISSTREET
62701 217-523-1814 FAX 217-544-0086
\\' Lust I' P. . .
RE:
Proposed Amendments to Dissolved Oxygen
Standard
35 ILL
. ADM .CODE 302
.206
Pollution Control Board Rule R04-25
The Illinois Association of Wastewater Agencies (IAWA) would
like to request that additional data be entered into the record of the
referenced petition . The data consists of continuous dissolved
oxygen (DO) measurements taken on a number of Illinois rivers
during the summer and early fall of 2006
. This data was requested
from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) before
the last hearing on this petition in November 2006 . The data has
only been made available to IAWA in late March 2007 . That data is
included with this letter. Please recall that during testimony much
was made of any data collected during 2005 because of the
widespread drought conditions that existed in Illinois that year
. This
data was collected in 2006 which was a much more average year in
regards to rainfall totals .
While IEPA included a disclaimer stating that they will assume no
responsibility for the accuracy of the data . the data is consistent
with data that has been collected in numerous other continuous
monitoring measurements prev iously entered as exhibits in this
April 24, 2007
Pollution Control Board
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
,1 RTC
100 Randolph Street, Suite
11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC #109
Clerk's
* *
Office,
* * * *
April 24, 2007
proceeding
. According to Mr. Matthew Short of JEPA ten of the thirty-two river
segments on which measurements were taken are those that would have the proposed
higher average DO limits of 6 .25 mg/L applied as recommended in the Joint IEPA and
Illinois Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) proposal
. According to IEPA and
IDNR, an enhanced DO limit is needed on selected Illinois river segments because the
agencies have determined that there are DO sensitive fish species present in those river
segments and that there is a need to maintain a higher average DO for a longer time into
the year
.
IAWA asked Dr
. James Garvey to review the 2006 data ; especially the ten river
segments that are suggested to have the agencies enhanced DO standard applied and
therefore should have the assemblage of DO sensitive fish species . IAWA asked Dr .
Garvey to compare the IAWA proposed standard (both DO concentrations and
proposed dates) to the Joint IEPA-IDNR proposed concentration and dates and to
determine which standard would be a better fit . All of the 2006 data has been collected
with continuous DO recorders during a non-drought year . Included with this letter is
Dr. Garveys' response to that request . In summary, the 2006 data support Dr
. Garvey
and Dr
. Whiles original suggested DO concentrations and dates for those concentrations
and closely follow those found in the USEPA National Criteria Document . The 2006
data further supports the IAWA proposed limits and in comparison are a better fit and
generate fewer violations than the proposed Joint IEPA-IDNR limits . That is true for
both the DO concentrations and the dates
.
Interestingly, some of the segments would even appear to be DO impaired
. They would
violate BOTH the IAWA and agency limits yet still are suggested to sustain a
population of the DO sensitive species proposed by the agencies
. As was said many
times during testimony it once again calls into question the methods and assumptions
made by the agencies in determining which river segments should have the enhanced
DO limits imposed or which fish species are truly DO sensitive
. The IAWA question
the validity of those methods
.
The IAWA respectfully asks that the Board consider this additional 2006 data as further
evidence that the proposed Joint IEPA-IDNR Recommended Revisions to the Illinois
General Use Water-Quality Standard for Dissolved Oxygen
be rejected as not supported
by all the data collected to date and made part of this review
. The proposed joint
standard does not accurately represent natural dissolved oxygen conditions in Illinois
waters
. As was stated in my previous letter to the board in December 2006, the IAWA
assessment of national and Illinois dissolved oxygen water quality criteria has withstood
the test of several years of evaluation and field measurements that have continued to
support the position of IA \\ A m regards to
establishing
reasonable dissolved oxygen
rcquiremcnes in Illinois
.
The Voice of Wastewater
Agencies in Illinois"
3
This new data further supports that position
. The seasonality of the proposed
concentrations has also held up to that test
. The IAWA proposed standard is more
conservative than the NCD in regards to establishing minimas for dissolved oxygen and
it adheres to the advice of local experts in establishing the months of late spawning and
protecting those early life stages
.
The IAWA has acknowledged that some waters in Illinois could he identified as
requiring a different dissolved oxygen average or minima lot certain least disturbed
waters
. However, the IAWA adamantly opposes establishing such criteria without the
ground truthmg data to support that designation
. The IAWA proposes to work closely
with IEPA and IDNR and other interested parties in establishing those criteria and
determining what are the attainable uses of the rivers and waters in Illinois
.
I'd like to remind the Board the IEPA and IDNR filed no data to support their joint
proposal
. They further testified that they made no attempt to ground truth their proposal
against collected data
. The IAWA asks the board to adopt the IAWA petition in total
with previously agreed to inclusion of a 30-day average and the narrative provision as
proposed by [EPA
.
Sincerely,
Electronic Filing, Received, Clerk's Office, April 24, 2007
* * * * * * * * PC #109 * * * * * * *
Dennis Streicher
Director of Water & Wastewater
Cc:
Richard McGill, Hearing Officer
Service list
. . . .The Voice
of Wastewater Agencies in
Illinois"
10 April 2007
Mr
. Dennis Streicher
IAWA
Dear Dennis
:
You recently forwarded to me some 2006 semi-continuous dissolved oxygen (DO) monitoring
data collected by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA)
. As noted by Matt Short's
e-mail to you, several of the segments are listed to receive enhanced status under the proposed
IDNR/IEPA standard before the Illinois Pollution Control Board (IPCB)
. I used the same
approach as I did when analyzing 2006 data collected by IAWA
. I summarized this approach
during the November 2006 IPCB hearing
. I evaluated the data relative to the proposed IAWA
standard and the IDNR/IEPA standard for enhanced DO surface waters
. The enhanced stream
segments I evaluated arc listed as
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC #109
Clerk's
* *
Office,
* * * *
April 24, 2007
IEPA
Segment
BM-PS-C2
DAG-03
GB-08
GB-18
PQC-06
PQFD-01
PQFD-H-C3
POI-10
PQI-H-C5
_Stream Name
Sugar Creek
Hodges Creek
DuPage
DuPage
SB Kishwaukee
Hampshire
Hampshire
EB Kishwaukee
SB Kishwaukee
In summary, both proposed sets of standards generated similar results, with the exception of
Sugar Creek
. In Sugar Creek, the proposed IDNR/IEPA standard generated violations whereas
the IAWA standard did not (Tables 1, 2)
. For the minimum criterion, ten and sixteen percent of
observations across months and stream segments generated violations for the IAWA and
IDNR/IEPA proposed standards, respectively (Table I)
. Five of the nine segments did not meet
the IDNR/IEPA proposed standard (Tables 1, 2)
. The majority of these violations occurred in the
Kishwaukee drainage .
Let me know if you have questions or need additional information
.
Sincerely,
Jim Uarnrv
A
. uciac Director & :1`suuule Prolessor
I fisheries rind II, Ayuarultnre Center
. AoaIthUl] Illinois I nicerskr . (
a1[ . . .
le. II . t,-")CII
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC #109
Clerk's
* *
Office,
* * * *
April
*
24, 2007
Table l .
Minimum criteria .
Proportion of dissolved oxygen concentration point estimates
(mg/L) quantified at each "enhanced" river site and month that were less than the minimum acute
concentration proposed by IEPA and IAWA are listed
. IEPA
: Not less than 5 mg/L, through July
31 : IAWA
: Not less than 5 mg/L through June 30
. For later months, IEPA
: Not less than 4
mg/L
; IAWA : Not less than 3
.5 mg /L .
_Month _
IAWA
IEPA
BM-PS-C2
Sugar Creek
July
0 .00
0 .12
Sept
0 .00
0 .00
BP-03
Vermilion River July
0
.00
0 .00
August
0 .00
0 .00
Sept
0 .00
0 .00
DAG-03
Hodges Creek July
0 .62
1 .00
August
1 .00
1 .00
Sept
0 .29
0 .60
Oct
0.00
0.10
GB-08
DuPage
July
0 .00
0 .05
August
0 .00
0 .14
GB-18
DuPage
July
0 .00
0 .00
August
0 .00
0
.00
PQC-06
SB Kishwaukee
June
0 .00
0
.00
August
0 .32
0 .35
PQFD-01
Hampshire
June
0 .00
0 .00
August
0 .00
0 .00
Sept
0 .00
0 .00
PQFD-H-C3 Hampshire
June
0 .00
0 .00
August
0
.00
0 .00
Sept
0 .00
0 .00
PQI-10
EB Kishwaukee June
0 .09
0 .09
August
0 .02
0
.11
PQI-H-C5
SB Kishwaukee
June
0
.18
0 .18
August
0
.07
0 .19
Average
0 .10
0
.16
Proportion of
Observations
0
.32
0 .48
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC #109
Clerk's
* *
Office,
* * * *
April
*
24, 2007
Table 2
. Seven-day mean and 7-d minimum criteria
.
Average 7-d mean values and
average 7-d minimum dissolved oxygen concentrations during each month
. Each value
within each month represents an average of the 7 preceding days
(e.g., a month with two
values listed below had 14 contiguous days of readings available
; three would have 21
days ; etc .) .
Month
7-d
mean 7-d min °
Violate
IAWA
Violate
IEPA
BM-PS-C2 Sugar Creek
July
6 .02
5 .23
X
5 .96
5
.21
X
Sept
7 .38
6 .26
6 .91
5 .96
BP-03
Vermilion
River
July
6 .96
6 .71
6 .86
6 .62
Sept
7 .52
6 .68
7 .51
6 .68
7 .53
6
.76
DAG-03
Hodges Creek
August
1 .32
0 .43 X
X
Oct
4.12
3.40
X
X
4 .27
3.57 X
X
GB-08
DuPage
July
9 .54
5 .55
9 .23
5 .01
GB-18
DuPage
July
8 .79
6 .01
PQC-06
SB
Kishwaukee
June
8 .47
7 .47
8 .47
7 .34
8 .38
7 .30
August
8.09
2.64 X
X
6 .48
1.68 X
X
PQFD-01
Hampshire
June
8 .83
6 .91
8 .79
6 .85
8 .65
6 .85
Sept
7 .72
6 .52
7 .71
6 .52
7 .71
6 .53
7 .55
6 .51
7 .56
6 .52
7 .51
6 .60
PQFD-H-
C3
Hampshire
June
9 .03
6 .90
9 .06
6 .84
9 .06
6
.86
Sept
9 .10
7 .77
9 .11
7 .76
9 .11
7 .77
8 .97
7 .83
8 .97
7 .11
Electronic Filing, Received, Clerk's Office, April 24, 2007
`7-d Means of daily means : I EPA
: Seven day averages must not be less than 6
.25 mg/l,
through July : IAWA : Seven day averages must not be less than 6
m.-/L
through Tune.
7-d means of daily minima : IEPA : Seven day averages must not be less than 4
.5 mg/L
after July 31 ; IAWA : Seven day averages must not be less than 4 mg/L after June 30
.
N/A = not applicable .
* * * * * * * * PC #109 * * * * * * *
8 .93
7 .17
8 .86
7 .17
8
.86
7 .23
PQI-10
EB
Kishwaukee June
8 .41
5 .13
7 .66
4
.79
August
9 .21
4 .24
X
8
.99
3.92 X
X
8
.37
3.76 X
X
PQI-H-CS
SB
Kishwaukee June
8 .44
4
.76
7
.60
4 .37
7 .18
4 .46
August
7.50
3.87 X
X
6 .85
3.54 X
X
Electronic Filing,
********Received, PC#109*******Clerk's
Office, April 24, 2007
STATIONS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW
ARE SEGEMNTS SUGGESTED FOR
6.25mgIL DO STANDARD
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC #109
Clerk's
* *
Office,
* * * *
April
*
24, 2007
STATIONS HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW
ARE SEGEMNTS SUGGESTED FOR
6.25mg/L DO
STANDARD
!BE-14
EMBARRAS RIVER
IBEZB-07
BF-01
NDIAN CREEK
SUGAR CREEK
IBFC-20
ROBINSON CREEK
_
BM-PS-C2 SUGAR •CREEK-NORTH
BP 03
VERMILION P.tIVER
w
BPJC-06
SALINE BRANCH
,BPJCA-UC-D1 BONEYARD CREEK
IBZK-0
RACCOON CREEK
C-09
LITTLE WABASH RIVER
C-33
LITTLE WABASH RIVER
DA-1 1
MACOUPIN CREEK
DAG-03
HODGES CREEK
1DB-01
APPLE CREEK
I DD-04
MAUVAISE TERRE CREEK
I,DE-01
MCKEE CREEK
IDH-04
SUGAR CREEK
`GB-08
Du.
. AGE'•RIVER
GB-18
DUPAGE RIVER
HBD 04
THORN CREEK
LHBDB-03
BUTTERFIELD CK
jHCC-07
NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO R
!HCCB-05
W FK NORTH BRANCH
HCCC-02
MIDDLE FORK
kHF-01
TINLEY CREEK
IPO-13
KISHWAUKEE RIVER
IPQC-06
S .,KI$HWAUKEE R
PQC-13
S BR KISHWAUKEE R
(PQFD-01
HAMPSHIRE
CREEK
PQFD-H-C3
HA PSHIRE
CREEK
PQI-10
SOUTH BRANCWEAST
PQI-H-C5
S© . RBRANCH-EAST
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,
* * * PC
Clerk's
#109
Office, April 24, 2007
(-BR W EDGE OF CAMARGO
IDOUGLAS
1 .5 MI S LAWRENCEVILLE AT RT 1 BR
LAWRENCE
0 .3 MI NE OF PALESTINE NEAR ICRR BR
CRAWFORD I
OLD RR BR NE ROBINSON 50YD UPS WWTP
CRAWFORD
US 150 BR., E'.EDGE OF PARIS AND 0 .9 MI . DNS PARIS SOUTH STP
EDGAR
VERMILION COUNTY FOREST PARK CANOE LAUNCH 4M1 E 0,5MI S WESTVILLE VERMILION
CO RD 24 B41 MI N MAYVIEW, 4 MI E URBANA
CHAMPAIGN
DNS OF US 150 NEAR SYCAMORE STREET URBANA
CHAMPAIGN
4 MI WSW FRANCISVILLE ON CO RD 050N
LAWRENCE
0.5 MI S BENNINGTON ON SALEM MT ERIE RD
EDWARDS
6 MI WNW GRAYVILLE
EDWARDS
2 MI SE OF STANDARD CITY ON COOPS MOUND RD
MACOUPIN
ICHISM RD BR 3:5 MINE OF ROCKBRIDGE
MACOUPIN
16 MI N ELDRED
GREENE
1 .5 MI NE MERRITT
SCOTT
j
I RT 104 BR AT CHAMBERSBURG
PIKE
2 MI NW RAY
SCHUYLER
RENWICK RD SWPLAINFIELO
VIKILL=
2 MI N SHOREWOOD AT-SLACKRD BR
WILL
THORTON RD BRAT THORNTON, IL
COOK
CHICAGO RD HOMEWOOD
COOK
TOUHY AV BR AT NILES
COOK
DUNDEE RD BR NORTHBROOK
COOK
LAKE-COOK CO LINE RD BR AT DEERFIELD
COOK
[135TH ST BR NR CRESTWOOD
COOK
I
PLEASANT VALLEY RD
MCHENRY
f
IRENERD
13R.2,MI
ENE OF FAIRDALE
~DFimm
12 MI SW DEKALB AT GURLER RD
DEKALB
[2.6
MI
;NWMAMPSHIRE AtWALKER ROAD
M
GHENRY
ALLEN RD BR, 1^ MI NW OFFHAMPSHIRE AND 1 MI DNS HAMPSHIRE WWTP
KANE'
2 MI SE' UNION
MGHENRY
MARENGORD -BR, 1.3 MI W OF HUNTLEY AND 2.9 MI DNS HUNTLEY WWTP
MCHENRY
Electronic Filing,
* * * * *
Received,*
* *
PC#109*******
Clerk's Office, April 24, 2007
16N
9E
34
39.79973
-88.17041
3N
38.69245
-87.69367
7N
NE
_39.0046 _ -87.59748
7N
SE
39.01495
-87.7262
1 N
SW
39.607504 -87.661115
18N
11W
SE
40.0157 -87.54628
19N
10E
5
SW
40.13312 -88.10473
I
19N
9E
8
40.1170055 -88.201375
2N
27
NE
38.57558
-87.72488
1N
10E
18
SE
38.51842
-88.13199
3S
1OE
18
NE
38.26991
-88.1377
10N
6W
16
39.316667
-89.773056
ION
9W 30'
®
_90.139167
11N 13W
28 ®
-90.54636
15N
12W
23
SW
39.73139
-90.40736
3S
2W
8
SW
39.81757
-90.65332
3N
1 W
22 ®
40.2313889 -90.4927778
36
9E
20
41 .5923 -88 .22435
35N
9E .
41 .5361111 -88.1813889
36N
14E
34
. 41 .56821
-87.60782
35N
14E
8
NW
41 .53986
41N
13E
30
42.01237
42N
4 ®
42.1383
42N 12E ©
-87.81833
32
NE
6E ®
NW
42N
42.11029
-88;90053
39N
4E
4
NW
41 .8925 -88.7861111
42N
6E
42.12222222
-88.56888889
42N
BE
20
NE
42.1064
-88.5547
43N
6E
12
42.21943' -88.49159'
43N
30
42.1681
-88.4535