1. page 1
    2. page 2
    3. page 3
    4. page 4

 
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REC
EIVED
1021 NORTH GRAND AVENUE EAST, P .O . Box 19276, SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62794-9276
-(
217) 782-3397APR
1 0 2007
JAMES R .
THOMPSON CENTER, 100 WEST RAN DOLPH, Sure 11-300, CHICAGO, IL 60601 -(312) 814-602STATE OF ILLINOIS
ROD R .
BLACOIEVICH, GOVERNOR
DOUGLAS P . SCOTT, DIRECTOR
Pollution Control Board
April 5, 2007
Michael McCambridge
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R . Thompson Center
100 W . Randolph Street, Ste 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
RE : Illinois EPA's ("Agency") Comments on R06-16, 17, and 18
Dear Mr . McCambridge :
On June 30, 2006, the Agency filed extensive comments in the consolidated identical-in-
substance rulemaking under (locket R06-16, 17, and 18 . On December 20, 2006, the Board
adopted the rules, and they were subsequently published in the Illinois Register on January 12,
2007 . The Agency appreciates the Board's consideration of its comments filed on June 30, 2006
and acknowledges that the vast majority of the Agency's comments were incorporated into the
rules . However, it appears that a handful of significant comments were not addressed
. Because
the comment period has expired, I was not certain of the appropriate procedure to follow to
express our concerns, so I am putting them to you in the form of a letter .
The Agency is particularly concerned about the following seven items that we do not feel were
addressed by the Board :
1 . Section 702 .120(b)(3) (our original comment #3 on R06-18) describes what an applicant
must do if they are required to have a permit (including new applicants or permittees with
expiring permits) :
a. 35 111. Adm . Code 702
.120(b)(3) requires new facilities or those with expiring permits
to comply with the interim status requirements at 35 Ill . Adm
. Code 703 .153
-
703 .157
. It appears that the requirement to comply with the interim status standards
may be more appropriate under Section 702 .120(b)(2) since this section specifically
refers to a facility with interim status that is applying for a permit
.
b. 35 Ill. Adm . Code 702 .120(b)(3) also requires these facilities to comply with Sections
702.120 through 702 .124, 703 .125, 703 .126, 703 .150, 703 .151, 703 .152, 703
.186,
and 703 .188 . These regulations are not specifically cited in the federal equivalent at
40 CFR 270 . 1 0(a)( 3)) . Therefore, even if the equivalent federal regulation (40 CFR
270 . 1 0(a)(3)) is fundamentally flawed (because a new facility or one with an expiring
permit would not follow the interim status requirements), the Illinois equivalent is not
consistent with it .
R1u KFORD -4102 North Main Street, Ro, kfortl, II. 61103 (815) 987-7760
DIS PIAINES-9511 W . H .irrison St ., Des Plaines, It 60(111, -(((47)
294-40(10
ELGIN-503 South State, EIFin, IL 60123--(847) 608- .11 l I
PI ORIA-!;415 N . University HI_ Peoria . IF61614 -(309) 691-541,3
BL
'RrALI
01
(ANT) -PIORIA-71,20 N . University St ., Peoria, II-61(14-( .109) 693-5462
CSIAMPAIGN-2125 5,neh First Street, Champaign, it . 01(120- (217) 278-5800
SPRINC, ILLD-4
.500 S-Sixth. Street Rd ., Springfield, II 0270(-(217) 786-6892
(IT[IINSVIILE-2009 M .ilI Street, CollinsviIle, 11-62231 -((,18)
346-5120
MARION -2109 W . Main SL, Suilc 116, Marion, IL 62959-(610) 993-7200
PRINT o oN ItICrI No PAPER
/~o~/~,~~~~~~/~ " t 3

 
c. As written, 35 Ill . Adm . Code 702.120(b)(3) leaves out a significant amount of
critical information that needs to be provided in an application for a new or expiring
permit. The Agency felt that Section 702
.120(b)(3) should be revised to require the
applicant to address the requirements in 35 III . Adm
. Code 702 Subpart B : Permit
Applications and 35 Ill . Adm . Code 703 Subpart D : Applications,
not just portions of
Parts 702 and 703 .
2 . Section 703 .350(c)(1), General Information
(our original comment #12 on R06-18) : The
Section does not include the following regulations : 703 .160 (from CFR 270 .1) and 702.104
& 703 .110 (from 40 CFR 270 .6). Please refer to the table we included in our original
comments . In order to be consistent with the federal regulations, 35 Ill
. Adm. Code
703
.350(c)(1) should have been revised to include Section 703 .160 (from 40 CFR 270
.1) and
Sections 702 .104 and 703 .110 (from 40 CFR 270 .6).
3 . Section 705
.302(a)(4)(I) (our original comment #30 on R06-18) indicates that all subsections
of Section 705 .144 (Administrative Record for Draft Permits or Notices of Intent to Deny)
apply. The corresponding federal regulation at 40 CFR 124
.204(d)(9) states, "All paragraphs
(of 40 CFR 124 .9) apply ; however, in the context of RCRA standardized permits, the
reference to draft permits is 40 CFR 124.204(c)
instead of 124 .6." Therefore, this subsection
of the State regulation is not identical in substance to the equivalent federal regulation and
should have been revised accordingly . NOTE: This type of "exception statement" for a
standardized permit is made in the preceding Section 705 .302(a)(4)(H) (40 CFR
124.204(d)(8)) .
4. Section 727 .100(b) (our original comment #41 on R06-18)
: States that a facility with interim
status must comply with the requirements of 35 Ill . Adm . Code 725 instead of 727 . . .
except
as provided in Subpart S of 35 Ill . Adm. Code 724 . This is consistent with the
corresponding federal regulation at 40 CFR 267 .2 . However, it is unclear why a regulation
directed at a facility with interim status (Section 727 .100(b)) would refer to the Special
Provisions for Cleanup (the regulations for CAMUs, temporary units, etc
.) in Subpart S of
Part 724 (or 40 CFR 264) . Neither Subpart S of Part 724 nor Section 725 .101 (Purpose,
Scope, and Applicability) make any reference to an exception to the interim status standards
in Subpart S of Part 724 .
5 . Section 727 .170(f)(1), Biennial Report (our original comment #46 on R06-18)
: This
subsection states, "The report must cover facility activities during the previous calendar year
and must include the following information :" This is consistent with the equivalent federal
regulation at 40 CFR 267 .75(a). Thus, as written, the Agency (and/or USEPA) would only
receive information regarding facility activities for every other year .
2

 
The federal regulations for other permitted facilities at 40 CFR 270 .30(l)(9) and 264 .75
require a biennial report . However, the State equivalents at 35 Ill . Adm . Code 703 .246(c)
and 724.175 require an annual report be provided
. Therefore, in order to be consistent with
the existing State regulations for other permitted facilities, and in order to receive
information regarding facility activities for each year, the Agency feels that Section
727.170(f)(1) should have been reworded to specify that an annual
report must be provided.
Section 20 .1 of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/20
.1) requires the Agency to
compile and make available an annual
report regarding certain hazardous waste operations
.
If we are only receiving biennial reports from facilities, how to we effectively put together
our annual reports? Additionally, the financial assurance requirements in Section 727
.240(c)
require annual updates to account for inflation . Again, how would the Agency check
compliance with that requirement if a site only provides closure cost estimates biennially?
6 . Section 727 .900(e) (our original comment #56 on R06-18) : subsection (e) contains the
alternate secondary containment requirements for containment buildings
. It states, "the
Agency must, in writing, allow the use of alternatives to the requirements for secondary
containment . . . The equivalent federal regulation at 40 CFR 267 .1 104 states, "the
Regional Administrator may waive the requirements for secondary containment . . ."
Therefore, as written, the requirements in 727 .900(e) are not consistent and are arguably less
stringent than the equivalent federal regulations . Section 727
.900(e) should have been
revised to read, "Agency may waive the requirements for secondary containment . . ." in
order to be consistent with the federal regulations .
7 . Section 727 .900(h)(2) (our original comment #59 on R06-18) : subsection (h)(2) states, "The
containment building also meets the requirements of Sections 727 .290(f)(1), (0(2)(A),
and
(1)(2)(B) ." This is consistent with the equivalent federal regulation at 40 CFR 267 .1107(b),
which refers to 40 CFR 267 .195(a), (b)(1) & (2) . However, section 727
.290(f)(2) (and the
federal equivalent) states that in order to meet the requirements of (f)(1), all of the
requirements of (f)(2) (i .e., subsections (f)(2)(A) thru (f)(2)(D)) must be met . The
requirements in Section 727 .900(h)(2) (and the federal equivalent) are not internally
consistent, and appear to contradict themselves . It appears that 40 CFR 267 .1107(b) and 35
Ill . Adm . Code 727 .900(h)(2) reference the wrong subsections of the secondary containment
regulations for tanks . We believe they should have been revised to reference 40 CFR
267 .195(a) and (b) and 35 Ill . Adm . Code 727 .290(f)(1) and (f)(2), respectively .
Additionally, the Agency again wishes to voice the general concern that the current format of
Part 727 is extremely difficult to follow
. It is not consistent with the format of the federal
regulations at all, which makes it very difficult for both the Agency and the regulated community
to follow . When this Part is reopened at some point in the future, the Illinois EPA would suggest
that the Part be restructured to follow the format of the federal regulations .
If you have questions or comments regarding this letter or wish to discuss this further, please do
not hesitate to contact me . Otherwise, I would appreciate you letting me know if there is
anything we could be doing to fixing the items addressed above .
3

 
im Geving
Assistant Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
(217) 782-5544
Cc :
Rob Watson
Steve Nightingale
4

Back to top