BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

INDIAN CREEK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, )

an Illinois Partnership, Individually as

)

beneficiary under trust 3291 of the Chicago

)

Title and Trust Company dated December 15, )

1981 and the Chicago Title and Trust Company, )

as trustee under trust 3291, dated December )

15, 1981

)

Complainant,

)

PCB-o

-1- 41 q

Respondents.

)

vs .

The BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE

RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation

TO: Weston W . Marsh

Robert M . Barratta Jr.

James H

. Wiltz

c/o Freeborn & Peters, LLP

311 S. Wacker Drive

Suite 3000

Chicago, IL 60606

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

NOTICE OF FILING

The Burlington Northern and

Santa Fe Railway Company

r/a CT Corporation System

208 S. LaSalle Street

Suite 814

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Citizen's Enforcement

§21(e), §12(a), §12(d)

RECEIVED

CLERK'S OFFICE

DEC 0 4 2006

Pollution

STATE OF

Control

ILLINOISBoard

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE

that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of the Illinois

Pollution Control Board the Complaint of Indian Creek Development Company, a copy of which

is herewith served upon you

. Take note that you may be required to attend a hearing at a date

set by the Board .

Failure to file an answer to this Complaint within 60 days may have severe consequences

.

Failure to answer will mean that all allegations in the Complaint will be taken as admitted for the

purposes of this proceeding . If you have any questions about this procedure you should contact

the hearing officer assigned to this proceeding, the Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board,

or an attorney .

Date : 12/4/2006

Indian Creek Development Company and

Chicago Land Trust Company tlu/t 3291,

dated December 15, 1981

By:177

'R t' y,

/t

0

One of It! Attorneys

---

GLENN C. SECHEN

JAMES R. GRIFFIN

M. HOPE WHITFIELD

Schain, Burney, Ross & Citron, Ltd .

222 North LaSalle St ., #1910

Chicago, IL 60601

312-332-0200

312-332-4514 telefax

psechen(a)

F :\GCS\Indian Creek

schainlaw

Development

.co

JB

m

lndustriesPCB Enforcement Action\Pleadings, Draft\NOF-PCB Complaint

.doc

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, certify that I have served the Complaint of Indian Creek

Development Company, by Registered Certified Mail, return receipt requested,

upon the following persons :

Weston W . Marsh

Robert M. Barratta Jr .

James H . Wiltz

C/o Freeborn & Peters, LLP

311 S. Wacker Drive

Suite 3000

Chicago, IL 60606

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME

this

4"

day of December, 2006 .

Official Seal

Janet L Baumann

Notary Public Stale of Illinois

M Commission Ex ras 12116,'2009

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

2

The Burlington Northern and

Santa Fe Railway Company

r/a CT Corporation System

208 S. LaSalle Street

Suite 814

Chicago, Illinois 60604

4

---

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

INDIAN CREEK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,

)

an Illinois Partnership, Individually as

)

beneficiary under trust 3291 of the Chicago

)

Title and Trust Company dated December 15,

)

1981 and the Chicago Title and Trust Company,

) )

as trustee under trust 3291, dated December

)

15, 1981

Complainant,

)

vs .

The BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE

RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation

Respondents

.

Printed on Recycled Paper

I

PCB-

0`1--yq

Citizen's Enforcement

§21(e), §12(a), §12(d)

COMPLAINT

VIOLATIONS OF SECTION 21(e) OF THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION ACT (415 ILCS 5/21(e))

= to

STATE"UiV01

°ollution Con"Or Lloarr

NOW COME the complainants, Indian Creek Development Company, individually

and as the beneficiary owner under the Chicago Title and Trust Company trust number

3291 dated December 15, 1981 and the Chicago Title and Trust Company, trustee

under trust number 3291 dated December 15, 1981 (collectively, "Indian Creek") and in

support of its complaint against the Respondent, the Burlington Northern Santa Fe

Railway Company ("BNSF") Indian Creek states as follows

:

1 .

At all times relevant hereto, complainant, Indian Creek Development

Company, an Illinois Partnership, was the beneficial owner, through the aforesaid

Chicago Title and Trust Company t/u/t 3291, of certain real property in Kane County,

Illinois commonly known as 1500 Dearborn Avenue, Aurora, Illinois 60505 and including

---

property index numbers : 15-13-376-001 ; 15-14-479-005, 15-14-479-006, 15-14-479-

009, and 15-14-479-010 ; 15-23-227-026 and 15-23-227-028 ; 15-24-101-004; 15-24-

102-001, 15-24-102-008, 15-24-102-009 and 15-24-102-010

; 15-24-103-002 and 15-24-

103-003 . (collectively the "Premises") .

2 .

At all times relevant hereto, respondent, BNSF, a Delaware corporation,

owned real property adjacent to the Premises which contained railroad tracks upon

which BNSF operated a railroad ("BNSF Property") .

3. On or about January 20, 1993 there occurred a release through the

discharging, depositing, dumping, leaking and spilling of thousands of gallons of diesel

fuel as a result of the industrial or commercial railroad operations conducted on the

BNSF Property .

4.

The direction of groundwater flow is from the BNSF Property to the

Premises and Indian Creek, which runs through the Premises .

5.

Subsequent to the release and pursuant to the Act, including Sections

12(a) and 12(d), the Attorney General and State's Attorney of Kane County filed an

enforcement action against the BNSF and others in Circuit Court bearing case number

CH KA 95 0527 .

6.

On or about February 5, 1996, a consent decree (hereinafter, "Consent

Decree") was entered in the Kane County enforcement action regarding the release of

diesel fuel on the BNSF Property . A copy of that Consent Decree is attached hereto as

Exhibit A.

Printed on Recycled Paper

2

---

there . The area of the excavation of the Premises was located near the boundaries of

the BNSF Property .

13. During the excavation, an odor was noted and free product and apparently

contaminated soil and groundwater were observed . Subsequently, samples of the free

product were taken from the excavated part of the Premises, and lab analysis identified

the free product as diesel fuel .

14. Indian Creek notified BNSF of the excavation on the Premises, and the

attendant odor, and the BNSF responded by removing some of the contaminated soil

from the excavation on the Premises .

15. The BNSF has a duty to prevent the migration to and contamination of the

soil and groundwater on and under the Premises, but despite the obligations imposed

by law and the Consent Decree, the BNSF has completely failed to take sufficient steps

to halt the migration of the diesel fuel contamination onto the soil and groundwater on

and under the Premises

.

16

. In contravention of its duty, the BNSF did little to remediate the affected

areas, recover released diesel fuel, limit the migration of the diesel fuel contamination,

adequately sample to determine the extent of contamination, and to monitor the

migration of the diesel fuel contaminants from the BNSF Property .

17.

Diesel fuel contamination on the BNSF Property continues to migrate onto

the Premises, further contaminating the soil and groundwater located on and under the

Premises on an ongoing basis .

18.

Subsequent to the discovery of diesel fuel contamination on the

Premises, without having performed any remediation of the premises and without prior

Printed on Recycled Paper

4

---

7 . Among other things, the Consent Decree required the BNSF to prevent

further migration of the diesel fuel contamination and to determine the extent to which

the soil and groundwater were impacted both on and off of the BNSF Property

.

8 . Pursuant to specific deadlines, the Consent Decree required the BNSF to

submit a work plan to, and obtain the approval of, the Illinois Environmental Protection

Agency ("Agency"), and it also required that the BNSF notify the State's Attorney,

Attorney General and ]EPA in writing of the action(s) taken . See generally Exhibit A .

9 . Thereafter, the BNSF was, pursuant to the Consent Decree, required to

file a close-out report which, at a minimum, was to include a summary of all sampling

and other data required to be collected, as well as a certification by an Illinois

Registered Professional Engineer that the requirements of the Consent Decree had

been met.

10 . The BNSF's initial efforts to remediate the affected areas, limit the

migration of free product, and recover released diesel fuel were primarily focused on

areas distanced from the Premises . Moreover, these efforts were largely unsuccessful,

resulting in the recovery of only a small amount of the diesel fuel that was actually

released .

11 . Since 1993, the diesel fuel has remained abandoned on and under the

BNSF Property and thereafter has migrated, and continues to migrate, from the BNSF

Property onto and under the Premises .

12 .

On or about late October or November, 2000, Indian Creek excavated a

small portion of a building floor on the Premises in order to install a piece of equipment

Printed on Recycled Paper

3

---

notification to Indian Creek, the BNSF requested Agency closure of the incident

pursuant to the Consent Decree without notifying the Agency of the contamination that

Indian Creek found on the Premises .

19 . The BNSF failed to disclose the contamination of the Premises to the

Agency despite Indian Creek's notification to the BNSF regarding the contamination it

found on and under the Premises when it excavated, despite the BNSF's removal of

contaminated soil from the excavation on the Premises, despite the observations of

BNSF's agents, servants, and employees when it removed the contaminated soil, and

despite the fact that laboratory analysis of samples taken from the excavations of the

Premises revealed that the contamination was diesel fuel . A copy of the BNSF's

request for closure dated April 2, 2001 with a prior request for closure dated November

6, 1998 attached thereto, attached to this petition as Exhibit B .

20. The spread of diesel fuel contamination to portions of the BNSF property

not initially impacted and eventually to the Premises was willful, as is amply

demonstrated by the BNSF's attempt to close the incident under the Consent Decree

without informing the Agency of the diesel fuel contamination on and under the

Premises .

21

.

The Agency is working to fulfill its role under the Consent Decree and to

obtain the remediation by the BNSF .

22. The diesel fuel contamination in the groundwater under both the BNSF

Property and under the Premises constitutes Water Pollution within the meaning of

Section 3 .545 of the Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS 5 et . seq. ("the Act"), as it

is a nuisance, renders such groundwater harmful or detrimental or injurious to public

Printed on Recycled Paper

5

---

health, safety or welfare, or to domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural,

recreational, or other legitimate uses, or to livestock, wild animals, birds, fish, or other

aquatic life

.

23.

This case is a refiling of Kane County case number 04 L 607 filed on or

about December 7, 2004 .

24. This case, like the Kane County case, concerns contamination that has

migrated to and continues to migrate onto the Premises from the BNSF Property

. The

Kane County case was voluntarily dismissed on November 21, 2006 . A copy of the

order of dismissal is attached as Exhibit C .

COUNTI

Section 12(a) Violation

25.

Paragraphs 1-24 are incorporated by reference as paragraph 25 hereof .

26 .

Section 12(a) of the Act provides that no person shall :

Cause or threaten or allow the discharge of any contaminants into the

environment in any State so as to cause or tend to cause water pollution

in Illinois, either alone or in combination with matter from other sources, or

so as to violate regulations or standards adopted by the Pollution Control

Board under this Act .

27 . Section 3 .550 of the Act defines "Waters" as all accumulations of water,

surface and underground, natural, and artificial, public and private, or parts thereof,

which are wholly or partially within, flow through, or border upon this State .

28 .

Accordingly, the groundwater under the Premises and that under the

BNSF Property are Waters within the meaning of Section 3 .550 of the Act

.

29.

Section 3 .165 of the Act (415 ILCS 5/3 .165) defines "Contaminant" as any

solid, liquid, or gaseous matter, any odor, or any form of energy, from whatever source .

Printed on Recycled Paper

6

---

30 .

The diesel fuel which was released is a Contaminant within the meaning

of Section 3.165 of the Act .

31

. Section 3 .545 of the Act defines "Water Pollution" as such alteration of the

physical, thermal, chemical, biological or radioactive properties of any waters of the

State, or such discharge of any contaminant into any waters of the State, as will or is

likely to create a nuisance or render such waters harmful or detrimental or injurious to

public health, safety or welfare, or to domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural,

recreational, or other legitimate uses, or to livestock, wild animals, birds, fish, or other

aquatic life . 415 ILCS 5/3 .545.

32 .

The General Assembly has expressly found "that pollution of the waters of

this State constitutes a menace to public health and welfare, creates public nuisances,

is harmful to wildlife, fish, and aquatic life, impairs domestic, agricultural, industrial,

recreational, and other legitimate beneficial uses of water, depresses property values,

and offends the senses" . 415 ILCS 5/11(a) .

33 . The BNSF caused and allowed the discharge of diesel fuel contaminants

on the BNSF Property in 1993, threatened, caused and allowed the discharge of said

diesel fuel contaminants through migration to other parts of the BNSF Property, and

threatened and eventually caused and allowed the ongoing discharge of contaminants

onto the soil and into the groundwater on and under the Premises so as to cause and

tend to cause water pollution in violation of Section 12(a) of the Act

.

34 .

Because of the ongoing migration of the diesel contamination and its

continued discharge onto and under the Premises, the violation of Section 12(a) of the

Printed on Recycled Paper

7

---

Act is ongoing and will continue unless and until abated by order of the Pollution Control

Board .

WHEREFORE, Complainants, pray that the Board grant the following relief in

favor of Indian Creek and against the BNSF

:

A.

Find the BNSF in violation of Section 12(a) of the Act

;

B .

Direct the BNSF to cease and desist from further violations of Section

12(a) of the Act ;

C .

Mandate and direct the abatement of the continuing violation of Section

12(a) of the Act at the expense of the BNSF as follows :

i.

Mandate the remediation of the BNSF Property in such a manner

as to stop the ongoing contamination of the Premises ; and

ii .

Mandate that the Premises be remediated to achieve the removal

of all contamination on the Premises that flowed from the BNSF

Property ;

iii .

Mandate, to the extent technically feasible, that all remediation be

performed to background levels and that, in no event, remediation

be performed to a level less than the applicable residential

standards contained in the Tiered Approach to Corrective Action

Objectives, 35 III . Admn. Code 742 ; and

iv . Mandate that the remediation of the Premises occurs pursuant to

the Agency's Site Remediation Program and that a No Further

Remediation Letter be obtained ;

Printed on Recycled Paper

8

---

D . Mandate that the Agency as well as the Parties hereto and their

consultants and attorneys be permitted to monitor the remediation of the

BNSF Property and the Premises, and allow them to have access to all

reports and laboratory analyses related in any way to the BNSF Property

and the contamination thereon ;

E. Order that any and all remediation be conducted by consultants and

engineers selected by either Indian Creek or the Board due to the BNSF's

failure to take adequate steps over more than 13 years to prevent to

migration of the contamination to other properties, and based on the

BNSF's attempt to obtain closure of the incident without notification to

Indian Creek and without informing the Agency of the contamination that it

knew existed on and under the Premises ;

F .

Order that any and all remediation that is conducted be conducted by

utilizing methods selected by either Indian Creek or the Board ;

G. That the Board request the Agency to investigate the facts and violations

set forth herein pursuant to Section 30 of the Act and thereafter name the

Agency as a party in interest, pursuant to 35 III . Adm . Code 101 .404 and

103 .202, to coordinate the Agency's duties and efforts pursuant to the

Consent Decree, Exhibit B ;

H . Mandate that the BNSF reimburse Indian Creek for its all of its costs and

expenses (including the fees of consultants and experts as well as the

cost of sampling and laboratory analysis) related to the contamination,

including but not limited to :

Printed on Recycled Paper

9

---

Printed on Recycled Paper

i.

The costs of past and, to the extent reasonably necessary,

future investigation of the contamination on the Premises ;

ii .

The costs of past and, to the extent reasonably necessary,

future sampling and monitoring of the contamination on the

Premises, its migration from the BNSF Property to the

Premises; AND

Grant such other and further relief as the Illinois Pollution Control Board

deems appropriate .

COUNTII

Section 12(d) Violation

35 .

Paragraphs 1 to 34 are incorporated by reference as paragraph 35 hereof .

36.

Section 12(d) of the Act provides that no person shall :

Deposit any contaminants upon the land in such a place and manner so

as to create a water pollution hazard .

37 . The BNSF caused and allowed the deposit of diesel fuel contaminants on

the BNSF Property in 1993 . Subsequently, the BNSF caused and allowed the

deposited contaminants to move, migrate, and deposit onto other portions of the BNSF

Property, and eventually to the Premises .

38 .

Accordingly, the BNSF's actions have created a water pollution hazard on

both the BNSF Property and the Premises in violation of Section 12(d) of the Act .

39.

Because of the ongoing migration of the diesel contamination onto the

Premises, the violation of Section 12(d) of the Act is ongoing and will continue unless

and until abated by order of the Pollution Control Board .

10

---

WHEREFORE, Complainants, pray that the Board grant the following relief

against the BNSF :

A .

Find the BNSF in violation of Section 12(d) of the Act ;

B .

Direct the BNSF to cease and desist from further violations of Section

12(d) of the Act ;

C.

Mandate and direct the abatement the continuing violation of Section

12(d) of the Act at the expense of the BNSF as follows :

Mandate the remediation of the BNSF Property in such a manner

as to stop the ongoing contamination of the Premises ;

ii .

Mandate the Premises be remediated causing the removal of all

contamination on the Premises which flowed from the BNSF

Property;

iii.

Mandate, to the extent technically feasible, that all remediation be

performed to background levels and, in no event, that the

remediation be performed to a level less than applicable residential

standards contained in the Tiered Approach to Corrective Action

Objectives, 35 III . Admn . Code 742;

iv.

Mandate that the remediation of the Premises occur pursuant to the

Agency's Site Remediation Program and that a No Further

Remediation Letter be obtained ;

D. Mandate that the Agency as well as the Parties hereto and their

consultants and attorneys be permitted to monitor the remediation of the

BNSF Property and the Premises, and allow them to have access to all

Printed on Recycled Paper

it

---

reports and laboratory analysis related in any way to the BNSF Property

and the contamination thereon ;

E. Order that any and all remediation be conducted by consultants and

engineers selected by either Indian Creek or the Board due to the BNSF's

failure to take adequate steps over more than 13 years to prevent to

migration of the contamination to other properties, and based on the

BNSF's attempt to obtain closure of the incident without notification to

Indian Creek and without informing the Agency of the contamination that it

knew existed on and under the Premises ;

F.

Order that any and all remediation that is conducted be conducted by

utilizing methods selected by either Indian Creek or the Board ;

G

. That the Board request the Agency to investigate the facts and violations

set forth herein pursuant to Section 30 of the Act and thereafter name the

Agency as a party in interest, pursuant to 35 III . Adm. Code 101 .404 and

103.202, to coordinate the Agency's duties and efforts pursuant to the

Consent Decree, Exhibit B .

H . Mandate that the BNSF reimburse Indian Creek for its all of its costs and

expenses (including but not limited to the fees of consultants and experts

as well as the cost of sampling and laboratory analysis) related to the

contamination including but not limited to :

The costs of past and, to the extent reasonably necessary,

future investigation,

Printed on Recycled Paper

12

---

the environment or be emitted into the air or discharged into any waters, including

groundwater . 415 ILCS 5/3 .185.

45. By allowing the diesel fuel spilled in 1993 to remain on and under the

BNSF Property and the Premises to mix with soil and groundwater media, the BNSF

has abandoned and disposed of said diesel fuel and diesel fuel contaminants.

46. The BNSF's abandonment and disposal of the diesel fuel and diesel fuel

contaminated media under the BNSF Property and the Premises are knowing violations

of the Act, as aptly demonstrated by the BNSF's attempt to close the incident pursuant

to the Consent Decree without informing the Agency of the diesel fuel contamination on

and under the Premises - contamination of which the BNSF was fully aware .

47 .

Neither the BNSF Property nor the Premises are permitted by the Agency

to be waste disposal sites or facilities and for that reason and otherwise they do not

meet the requirements of a waste disposal site or facility under the Act or under

applicable Illinois Pollution Control Board regulations .

48 .

Such violation of Section 21(e) of the Act is ongoing and will continue

unless and until abated by order of the Pollution Control Board .

WHEREFORE, Complainants, pray that the Board grant the following relief

against the BNSF:

A.

Find the BNSF in violation of Section 21(e) of the Act;

B .

Direct the BNSF to cease and desist from further violations of Section

21(e) of the Act ;

C .

Mandate and direct the abatement the continuing violation of Section

21(e) of the Act at the expense of the BNSF as follows :

Printed on Recycled Paper

14

---

ii .

The costs of past and, to the extent reasonably necessary,

future sampling and otherwise monitoring the contamination

on the Premises and the migration of contamination on the

BNSF Property ;

iii .

such costs and expenses include but are not limited to the

fees of consultants and experts as well as the cost of

sampling and laboratory analysis ; AND

I .

Grant such other and further relief as the Illinois Pollution Control Board

may deem appropriate .

COUNTIII

Section 21 (e) Violation

40.

Paragraphs 1 to 38 are incorporated by reference as paragraph 39 hereof

.

41 .

Section 21(e) of the Act provides that :

No person shall . . .[d]ispose, treat, store or abandon any waste, or

transport any waste into this State for disposal, treatment, storage or

abandonment, except at a site or facility which meets the requirements of

this Act and of regulations and standards thereunder .

42.

Section 3 .535 of the Act defines "Waste" as, inter alia, any "discarded

material" resulting from industrial or commercial operations

. 415 ILCS 5/3.535.

43.

The diesel fuel and contaminated media on and under the BNSF Property

that the BNSF has abandoned and disposed of is Waste under the Act .

44.

Section 3 .185 of the Act defines "Disposal" as the discharge, deposit,

injection, dumping, spilling, leaking or placing of any waste or hazardous waste into or

on any land or water or into any well so that such waste or hazardous waste may enter

Printed on Recycled Paper

13

---

i.

Mandate the remediation of the BNSF Property in such a manner

as to stop the ongoing contamination of the Premises ;

ii

.

Mandate the Premises be remediated causing the removal of all

contamination on the Premises which flowed from the BNSF

Property;

iii .

Mandate, to the extent technically feasible, that all remediation be

performed to background levels and, in no event, that the

remediation be performed to a level less than applicable residential

standards contained in the Tiered Approach to Corrective Action

Objectives, 35 III . Admn . Code 742 ;

iv. Mandate that the remediation of the Premises occur pursuant to the

Agency's Site Remediation Program and that a No Further

Remediation Letter be obtained ;

D. Mandate that the Agency as well as the Parties hereto and their

consultants and attorneys be permitted to monitor the remediation of the

BNSF Property and the Premises, and allow them to have access to all

reports and laboratory analysis related in any way to the BNSF Property

and the contamination thereon ;

E . Order that any and all remediation be conducted by consultants and

engineers selected by either Indian Creek or the Board due to the BNSF's

failure to take adequate steps over more than 13 years to prevent to

migration of the contamination to other properties, and based on the

BNSF's attempt to obtain closure of the incident without notification to

Printed on Recycled Paper

15

---

Indian Creek and without informing the Agency of the contamination that it

knew existed on and under the Premises ;

F.

Order that any and all remediation that is conducted be conducted by

utilizing methods selected by either Indian Creek or the Board ;

G . That the Board request the Agency to investigate the facts and violations

set forth herein pursuant to Section 30 of the Act and thereafter name the

Agency as a party in interest, pursuant to 35 III . Adm. Code 101 .404 and

103 .202, to coordinate the Agency's duties and efforts pursuant to the

Consent Decree, Exhibit B .

H . Mandate that the BNSF reimburse Indian Creek for its all of its costs and

expenses (including but not limited to the fees of consultants and experts

as well as the cost of sampling and laboratory analysis) related to the

contamination including but not limited to :

iv.

The costs of past and, to the extent reasonably necessary,

future investigation,

v.

The costs of past and, to the extent reasonably necessary,

future sampling and otherwise monitoring the contamination

on the Premises and the migration of contamination on the

BNSF Property ;

vi.

such costs and expenses include but are not limited to the

fees of consultants and experts as well as the cost of

sampling and laboratory analysis ; AND

Printed on Recycled Paper

16

---

GLENN C . SECHEN

JAMES R. GRIFFIN

M. HOPE WHITFIELD

Schain, Burney, Ross & Citron, Ltd .

222 North LaSalle St

., #1910

Chicago, IL 60601

312-332-0200

312-332-4514 telefax

gsechen(@schainlaw .com

F

:\GCS\Indian Creek Development JB Industries\PCB Enforcement Action\Pleadings, Draft\Indian Creek PCB Complaint-FNL .doc

Printed on Recycled Paper

Grant such other and further relief as the Illinois Pollution Control Board

may deem appropriate .

Respectfully Submitted,

Indian Creek Development Company and

Chicago Land Trust Company t/u/t 3291,

dated December 15, 1981

By: O

e of Its Attor eys

17

---

)7 THr. CIRCUIT

COURTKNF

CH

FORCOUNTY,

NtERYTHE

DIVISION

SIXTEENTH!

ILLINOIS

JUfl2 .,`IJj

CI CuIT

CONSENT

ORDER

Plaintiff, the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ex red . JAMES

E

. RYAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, ex rel . DAVID R

.

AKEMANN, State's Attorney of Kane County, Illinois, and Defendants,

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,

SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and

subsidiary of SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation, and SPCSL CORP

., a Delaware corporation and subsidiary

of SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, having agreed to the

making of this stipulation and the entry of this Consent Order, do

hereby

stipulate and agree as follows

:

1

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,

)

ex ref . JAMES E

. RYAN, Attorney

General of the State of Illinois

and ex red . DAVID

P . AKEMANN,

)

State's Attorney of Kane

)

County,

Plaintiff,

vs .

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

COMPANY, a Delaware corporation,

SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION

a Delaware

corporation,

and subsidiary of SOUTHERN

PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION,

a Delaware corporation, and

SPCSL CORP

., a Delaware corporation

and subsidiary of SOUTHERN PACIFIC

TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,

Defendants

.

1

)

No .

CH KA 95 0527

)

)

clerk

UAM

h~

ON

)

-:.»e mil . Coup

)

Y'~L

))

Q 1996

1

))

BRED

u~y

) .

---

I .

,~TZpiT1.ATIcN

OfU

E AND AETHORIZAn0N

The parties stipulate that this

Consent Order is entered into

for purposes of

settlement c:a y and that neither the tact that a

party has entered into this Consent Order, nor any of the facts

stipulated herein, shall be used for any purpose in this or any

other proceeding except to enforce the terms hereof by the parties

to this agreement

. Further, this Consent Order or the performance

hereunder by the defendants BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY, a

Delaware corporation, SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANi', a

Delaware corporation, and subsidiary of SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL

CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and SPCSL CORP ., a Delaware

corporation and subsidiary of SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION

COMPANY, shall not create any right on behalf of any person or

entity not a party hereto

. Notwithstanding the previous sentences,

this Consent order may be used in any future enforcement action as

evidence of a past adjudication of violation of the Illinois

Environmental Protection Act

("Act")

forr purposes of Section 42(h)

of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/42(h)(1994)

.

The undersigned representative for each party certifies that

he/she is fully authorized by the party who he/she represents to

enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent Order and to

legally bind the party he/she represents to the Consent Order

.

2

---

11 .

STATEMENT

F AcT'S

Part-~a

1 .

The Attorney General of the State of Illinois brings this

action on his own motion as well as at the request of the Illinois

Environmental

Protection Agency ("Agency"), and the State's Attorney

of Kane County, Illinois, brings this action on his own motion,

pursuant to the statutory authority vested in them under Section 42

of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/42 (1994)

.

2 .

The Agency is an agency of the State of Illinois created

pursuant to Section 4 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/4 (1994)

, and charged,

inter aiia,

with the duty of enforcing the Act .

3 .

At all times relevant to this Consent Order,

Burlington

Northern Railroad Company ("Burlington"), is a Delaware corporation

authorized to do business in Illinois since February 27, 1970, and

is engaged in the business of providing rail transportation

services .

4 .

At all times relevant to this Consent Order, Southern

Pacific Rail Corporation

("SPRC"), is a Delaware rail holding

corporation and is not authorized to do business in Illinois . SPRC

is the parent company of Southern Pacific Transportation Company,

owning loot

of its capital stock .

5 .

At all times relevant to this Consent

. Order, Southern

Pacific Transportation Company, ("Southern Pacific"), a Delaware

corporation and subsidiary of Southern Pacific Rail Corporation,

the parent company of SPCSL Corp

. Southern Pacific is in

the

business of providing railroad freight transportation services and

provides such seniices in Illinois through irs wholly-owned

3

---

subsidiary

SPCSL .

Southern

Pacific itself is

not

authorized

to do

business in

Illinois . On information and

belief

Southern Pacific

conducts

business in Illinois

through

its

wholly owned subsidiary

SPCSL

Corn

.

5 .

At

all times relevant

to this consent Order, SPCSL

Corp .

("SPCSL") was

and is a Delaware corporation

qualified

to do business

in Illinois on

November 3, 1989 . SPCSL is

a

wholly-own subsidiary

of Southern

Pacific and is in the

business of providing rail

transportation

services in Illinois .

7 .

Defendants Southern

Pacific, SPRC and SPCSL, shall

hereinafter be referred to collectively as Southern Pacific

.

B .

Site Description

1 .

At all times relevant to this Consent

Order, the site is

located on the Burlington rail lines east of the Village of Aurora

near the community of Zola, Aurora, Kane County, Illinois . The site

consists of five east-west rail tracks and spurs with a warehouse

forming its southern boundary and a smaller building forming the

northern boundary

.

2 .

Of the five east west rail tracks, three are mainline

tracks and the other two are siding tracks

. The three mainline

tracks provide Burlington access into the Chicago, Illinois gateway

.

The three mainline tracks originate in Chicago, Illinois and extend

west to Galesburg, Illinois, and Kansas City, Missouri and also to

St

. Paul, Minnesota and to Seattle, Washington

. The mainline tracks

are utilized to provide through freight rail service, Amtrak service

and Metra computer service

. In excess of 15S trains per 24 hourr

period operate aver the three mainline tracks

. The two siding

tracks are used as passing tracks anti fm

: the storage of cars and

4

---

trains

. They are

also u_,ed

Lo ast

In train

movement over

the

throe mainline tracks .

3 .

Located parallel to the sits is a

drainage

ditch .

Surface runoff is collected by a

storm

sewer

that discharges

into

Indian Creek which is a tributary of

the

Fox

River .

4 .

At all times

relevant

to this Consent

Order,

Burlington

owns,

operates

and is in control of the site .

The movement

of

trains, cars

and engines over and along its tracks are subject to

Burlington's direction and control .

5 .

At all times relevant to this Consent Order, pursuant to

a Trackage Rights Agreement entered into by and between Burlington

and Southern Pacific, Southern Pacific uses the site for the conduct

of its rail services .

C .

Alieaeci violations

1 .

Section 12 (a) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12 (a) (1994),

provides as follows :

No person shall :

a .

Cause or threaten or allow the discharge of any

contaminants into the environment in any State so as

to cause

or tend to cause water pollution in

Illinois, either alone or in combination with matter

from other sources, or so as to violate regulations

or standards adopted by the Pollution Control Board

under this Act

;

2 .

Section 12(d) of the Act, 41S ILCS 5/12(d) (1994),

provides as follows :,

e

No person shall :

d .

Deposit

any contaminants upon land in such place and

manner so as to create a water

pollution hazard ;

3 .

Plaintiff alleges that on January 20, 1993, due to errors

on the part of certain Burlington employees, including, its

S

---

dispatcher,

train

engineer and conductor, a train owned and operated

by Burlington and traveling westbound over the site, collided head-

on with a train owned and operated by Southern Pacific which was

traveling eastbound . Burlington denies this allegation

.

4 .

On January 20, 1993, when the trains collided, three

diesel fuel tanks with combined fuel capacity of 10,800 gallons of

fuel, ruptured, releasing approximately 5,800-6,800 gallons of

diesel fuel onto the ground and into a nearby creek causing an

"oily" sheen to appear on the waters in , the nearby ditch and creek

.

5 .

To date, 208 gallons of the 5,800-6,800 gallons of

diesel fuel spilled at the site have been recovered via the recovery

trench system installed

. Burlington as the owner and operator of

the site has not fully remediated the diesel fuel contaminated soil

at the site .

III .

APPLICABILITY

This Consent Order shall apply to and be binding upon the State

or plaintiff, Burlington and Southern Pacific . Burlington and

Southern Pacific shall not raise as a defense to any action to

enforce this Consent Order, the failure of any of its officers,

agents, servants or employees to take such action as shall be

required to comply with the provisions of this Consent Order .

IV .

e

COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS ANDRRGULATIONS

This Consent order in no way affects the responsibilities of

Burlington and Southern Pacific to comply with any other federal,

state or local regulations, including but not limited to the Act,

and the Board Rules and Regulations, 35 111

. Adm . Code Subtitles A

6

I

---

throLlCm

V .

VENUE

The parties agree that the venue

of

any action commenced in

Circuit Court for

the purpose of interpretation and enforcement of

the terms and conditions of this Consent Order shall be in Kane

County .

VI .

SEVERABILITY

It is the intent of the parties hereto that the provisions of

this Consent Order shall be severable, and should any provisions be

declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be inconsistent

with state or federal law, and therefore unenforceable, the

remaining clauses shall remain in full force and effect

. In the

event that any provision of this Consent Order and plans implemented

herein shall be declared inconsistent with the provisions of the

Act, 415 ILCS, 5/1 et seq . (1994), the provisions of theAct shall

kie controlling .

VII .

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and upon the

eensent of the parties hereto to perform the activities to be

ordered by the court, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED 'AND DECREED

:

A .

Jurisdiction

This court has

jurisdiction of the subject matter herein and of

the

parties consenting hereto pursuant to the Act

.

---

B .

Objectiv

The

objective of this

Consent Order

is to have_ an

enforceable

order

which will ensure the

implementation of

the terms

hereof,

to

obtain

remediation of the site as

is economically

reasonable and

technologically feasible,

to assure the protection of public health,

safety, welfare and the environment, and compliance with the Act,

Board's Water Pollution Regulations, the Federal Clean Water Act

any applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder

.

C .

TermsofSettlement

1 .

Payment to the Envir nm n-al

Protection

Trust-

Fund

a .

Penalty

i .

Burlington and Southern Pacific shall together

pay a penalty of $85,000 .00 into the Illinois

Environmental Protection Trust Fund

. Such

penalty amount shall be paid within thirty (30)

days of the date of this order

. This penalty

shall be paid by check to the Treasurer of the

State of Illinois for deposit in the

Environmental Protection Trust Fund and

delivered to :

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Fiscal Services Division

2200 Churchill Road

P .O . Box 19276

Springfield, IL 62794-9276

The name and number of the case, the Agency's

incident number that was assigned to this

release and Burlington's and Southern Pacific's

Federal Employer's Identification Number

a

and

---

("FE"IN")

shall appear

_n the face

of the

check .

Durlincton's F°IN is 43-6034000

.

Southern

Pacific's FEIN is 94-600123 .

The P.oency's

incident number is 930190 .

ii . Burlington and Southern Pacific are jointly and

severally liable for the $85,000

.00 civil

penalty required in Section VII .C

.l .a .i .

herein .

b .

Stipulated Penalties

i .

in the event Burlington fails to satisfy any

requirement or comply with any provision of

this Consent Order, or fails to satisfy any

requirement of any plaintiff-approved work

plan or schedule' developed pursuant to this

Consent Order, Burlington shall pay to the

plaintiff for payment into the Illinois

Environmental Protection Trust Fund,

stipulated penalties in the amount of $500

.00

per day of noncompliance until such time as

compliance is achieved

.

ii . All penalties owed the plaintiff under this

subsection VII

.C .l .b . shall be payable within

thirty (30) days of the date Burlington knows

or Should have known of its noncompliance

with any provision of the Consent order .

iii

. All penalties shall begin to accrue on the

day that complete performance is due and

continue to accrue through the final day of

9

---

iv .

correction of the

compliance

.

All

stipulated penalties

shall be

paid by

check made payable to the Treasurer of the

State of Illinois for deposit in the

Environmental Protection Trust Fund and

delivered to :

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

Fiscal Services Division

2200 Churchill Road

Springfield,

P .O . Box 19276Illinois

62794-9276

The name and number of the case and

Burlington's Federal Employer's

Identification Number

shall appear

on the face of the check .

v .

The stipulated penalties shall be enforceable

by the plaintiff and shall be

in addition to

and shall not preclude the use of any other

remedies or sanctions arising from

Burlington's failure to comply with the

Consent Order

.

c . pestAesnonse Costs

within thirty (30) days of entry of the Consent Order,

Burlington shall pay the amount of $1,430

.55 in satisfaction of

claim(s) the plaintiff may have for all investigation, response,

and oversight costs that occurred prior to the entry of this

Consent Order . The $1,430

.55 payment required herein shall be

paid to the Treasurer of the State of Illinois designated to the

Hazardous Waste Fund with the Emergency Oversight number, 930190

on the face of the check, and submitted to

:

10

---

Springfield,2200PFiscalIllinois.O

. BoxChurchillServices19276Environments]IL

Road62794-9275DivisionProtection

Agency

d .

FutureRecnonsecosts

Subject to Section F

below, Burlington

shall

reimburse

the Agency

for any

response

and oversight cost

incurred

subsequent to the entry of this Consent Order

. The Agency agrees

to submit to Burlington, on a quarterly or annual basis at its

discretion, a detailed accounting that shall include a summary of

response and oversight activities performed, a detailed summary

of all expenses claimed and a statement that the expenses have

actually been incurred . Upon request, the Agency shall provide

Burlington with copies of all receipts and other documents

evidencing such expenditures, excluding actual Agency employee

signed timesheets . No reimbursement shall be required for the

costs for which no documentation was provided, until such time as

the required documentation is provided for such costs

. Said

detailed accounting shall include all response and oversight

costs incurred pursuant to this Consent Order by the Agency with

respect to this Consent Order after the effective date of this

Consent Decree

. Specifically relating to the issue of future

response cost only, where the Dispute Resolution provision of

Section F is invoked herein in

good faith, each party to bear its

own legal costs associated with the resolution of the future

response costs dispute .

Within thirty (30)

days of receipt of the accounting

required herein, any payments required herein shall be paid to

the Treasurer of the State of Illinois designated to the

11

---

Hazardous

c:`aste Fund on the

checi, and subm;.tcn3

t:c :

Springfield,2200PFiscalIllinois.O

. BoxChurchillServices19276

EnvironmentalIL

Road

62794-9276

DivisionProtection

Agency_

e .

The name and

number of the case

and Burlington's

Federal Identification Number ("FEIN") shall

appear

of all checks

required herein .

f .

Interest on Penalty

Pursuant to

Section 42(g) of the

Act,

12

on the face

415 ILCS

5/42(g)

(1994) , interest shall

accrue on

any penalty amount not paid

within the time prescribed herein, at the maximum rate allowable

under Section 1003 (a) of

. the Illinois Income Tax Act, 35 ILCS

5/1003 (a) (1994) .

i .

Interest on unpaid penalties shall begin to

accrue from the date the penalty payment is

due and

continue

to accrue to the date

payment is received .

ii Where partial payment is made on any payment

amount that is due, such partial payment

shall be first applied to any interest on

unpaid penalties then owing .

iii . All interest on penalties owed the plaintiff,

shall be paid by certified check payable to

the Treasurer of the State of Illinois for

deposit in the Environmental Protection Trust

Fund and delivered to

:

---

2200FiscalIllineisChurchillServicesEnvironmentaiRoadLivisionProtection

Agency

P .O . Box 19276

Springfield, IL 62794-9276

The name and

number

of the case and

Burlington's

Federal

Identification

Number

("FEIN")

shall appear on the

face of the

check .

2 .

Fue1'COntainmentandRecovery Act ltiec

Burlington shall minimize the impact to the environment from

the approximately 5,800 -

6,800 gallons of diesel fuel spilled and

released at the site

. The following is designed to achieve this

objective :

a

on approximately February 14, 1994, Burlington

provided to Plaintiff, . a report titled, Phase I

Emergency Fuel Containment ("Phase I Report"), which

outlined the activities and measures implemented by

Burlington in its initial response to contain, the

5,800

- 6,800 gallons of diesel fuel spilled and

released at the site . These included

the following :

i .

On January 20, 1993, absorbent

material was

placed in the creek immediately north of the

site where fuel was ponding .

ii

. Shallow cut-off trenches were dug on either

side of the tracks in the area of the spill and

two (2) over and under dams were constructed .

iii

. Booms were deployed at the east

end of the

storm sewer

and at the west end of the storm

sewer where such storm sewer discharges .

13

---

From February 8 - 10 . 1993, four

soil

borings

were installed and

completed as

monitoring

wells on each side

of the track

in

the area

of

the

diesel fuel release .

Four additional

monitoring wells were installed downgradient of

the area of the diesel fuel spill

.

b .

In approximately

March, 1993, Burlington retained

the services of Radian Corporation ("Radian"), an

Engineering firm, to characterize the subsurface

extent of any diesel fuel contamination of the site,

and to implement a diesel fuel recovery system .

These included but were not limited to the following

activities :

i .

Soil and groundwater samples were obtained and

analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons

("TPH") . The result from such sampling

activity showed diesel fuel

contamination of

the area soil and groundwater . Free diesel

fuel was also observed in one of the monitoring

wells .

ii

. Between April 2, 1993 and August 17, 1993, a

groundwater intercepter trench with a

groundwater depression pump and scavenger pump

was installed to remove free diesel fuel from

the groundwater .

14

---

iii .

On

May 30,

1993,

a Wastewater Discharge

Permit

IWDP-029 was issued

by the

Aurora

Sanitary

District ("Sanitary District")

for the

discuarge of groundwater

from

Burlington's

remediation system

to the

sanitary

district

sewer . 525,360 gallons

of

groundwater

have

been pumped and discharged to the sanitary

district sewer .

iv . The Phase I Report provided for a Phase II

Follow-up Response which included among other

things, the performance of a supplemental site

characterization and evaluation of remedial

options .

c .

Effective immediately, Burlington shall at all times

maintain in good working order its diesel fuel

containment and recovery system .

d .

Effective immediately and continuing until the site,

including the soil and groundwater, and off-site

areas are remediated to meet any and all Agency-

approved closure criteria established for this

site, Burlington shall continue to monitor its

diesel fuel containment and recovery system and

implement as appropriate, all measures designed to

prevent the diesel-fuel spilled and released at its

site, from migrating further off-site .

e .

No later than sixty (60) days of entry of this

Consent Order, Burlington shall prepare and provide

to the plaintiff and the Agency, a report which

15

---

suwrnar'_s.~~

all

f,e,l

containment,

recover",

remediatien, rnonitari.n g and

maintenance

activities

conducted at

the site since the

January

20, 1993

diesel fuel release .

Burlington

shall also

document

in said report all soil and

groundwater

analyses

conducted

at the site

from January 20,

1993 to the

date of entry of this Consent Order

. Burlington

shall also include copies of all analytical results

and all boring logs obtained during this period of

time .

3 .

Identified IRQsponse Action

Burlington shall determine the extent to which

the soil

and groundwater are impacted by

the

diesel fuel released, and

shall remediate the site includinST the soil and groundwater and

any off=site impacted

area(s)

to achieve the Agency-approved

closure criteria

established for the site and to prevent

further migration of the released and unrecovered diesel fuel

.

The following is designed to achieve this requirement

:

a .

Beginning not later than forty-five (45) days from

the date of entry of this Consent Order,

Burlington's Engineering Consultant shall prepare

and provide to the plaintiff and the Agency for

review and approval, a draft Phase II Work Plan

("Work Plan") and schedule for all of the activities

required herein

. This Work Plan shall include

detailed description of the procedures for the

conduct of a study to determine the technical

feasibility of in-situ bioremediation and soil

1.6

a

---

f 7 .-I

~ ..~

as

other

technologically

feasible

technologies to address soil

and

groundwater

remediaticn on and off-site .

The

Work Plan

shall

also include the activities

to

be performed for the

characterization of the soil and groundwater, the

identification of potential pathways of migration of

the diesel fuel contaminated soil and groundwater,

and identification of potentially affected human

and environmental receptors

. The Work Plan shall

also propose the site closure criteria for the

plaintiff and Agency approval

. Such approval shall

not be unreasonably withheld

. The plaintiff shall

have thirty (33) days for the review of this Work

Plan . The plaintiff

may

extend the time

for review

by a period not to exceed fourteen (14) days by

notifying Burlington prior to the expiration of the

initial thirty (30) day review period .,

i .

If the plaintiff accepts the Phase

II Work Plan

required in paragraph VII .C .3 .a . above,

Burlington shall implement said Work Plan in

accordance with the schedule contained therein .

If the plaintiff objects to any recommended

activity, or requires any additional activity

to be performed by Burlington, it shall provide

Burlington with a detailed statement as to

reasons for its objections, including the

specific type of information which the

plaintiff deems Burlington did not provide

17

---

the Phase ii Work Plan, or the

specified

activity Burlington

is required

to perform

.

iii

. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of any Phase

lI Work Plan disapproval or modification,

Burlington shall submit a revised Phase II Work

Plan to the plaintiff which incorporates the

modifications required by the

plaintiff, or

shall invoke the Dispute Resolution provisions

of Section VII .F . below . If Burlington

fails

to initiate the Dispute

Resolution procedures

within the thirty (30) day time period

specified herein, Burlington shall be deemed to

have agreed to the specified modifications

.

iv

. In the event that the Dispute Resolution

provision of paragraph VII .F . herein, is

invoked, within twenty-one (21) days from the

date of the resolution, of the dispute,

Burlington shall provide to the plaintiff a

revised Phase 11 Work Plan consistent with the

results of the Dispute Resolution addressing

Plaintiff's comments . Plaintiff shall have

thirty (30) days to review this revised Phase

II Work Plan .

v .

Burlington shall initiate and complete the

implementation

of the Phase II Work Plan

including the study of the technical

feasibility of in-situ bioremediation and soil

flushing or other possible technologies to

i8

---

ad~zess

soda and groundwater

remed

ation

on and

off-site,

within the time

frame

specified

in

any Phase II work Plan

approved by the

plaintiff .

b

Within forty-five (45) days of the

completion of all

activities required pursuant to the plaintiff-

approved Phase IZ Work Plan, the engineering

consultant shall prepare a draft report of all Phase

II activities performed . This draft report shall be

submitted to the plaintiff and the Agency for

review

and comments . The draft report shall document the

study process including copies of all drawings

indicating all materials and equipment examined in

the study

. The report shall also include,

Burlington's determination of technical feasibility

of in-situ bioremediation and soil flushing or other

technologies to address soil and groundwater

remediation on and off-site, all findings of

Burlington's site characterization including results

of the groundwater sampling analyses, and all

identified potential pathways for migration of the

diesel fuel contaminated soil and groundwater and

the potentially affected

human and enviro :unental

receptors

. This draft report shall also include any

and

all recommended remedies including but not

limited to in-situ bioremediation and soil flushing

to remediate the site, as well as cther technologies

to remediate soil and groundwater on and off-site

.

19

---

Plaiiiiiff r:hlit

have Cnirty

(30) days

tc comment

on

the draft report

c .

n

within thirty (30) days

of receiving

plaintiff's

comments,

Burlington shall provide

to the

Plaintiff

a final

report

which

shall incorporate the

Plaintiff's comments

.

Concurrent with

this report,

Burlington shall notify the plaintiff

and the

Agency

in writing, of the action(s) to be taken by

Burlington to remediate the site, including soil and

groundwater .

d .

If Burlington proposes not to remediate the site,

including the soil and groundwater contamination, or

proposes an alternative remedial measure not

outlined in its final report, the notification

required in Section VII .C .3 .c . above shall set forth

in detail, all reasons for either the non-action or

the alternative remedial action being proposed .

The plaintiff retains the right to among other

things, rebut and/or reject Burlington's selection

of a particular remedial action or its decision of

non-action or selection of an alternative remedial

action not outlined in its final report and pursuant

to Section VII

.F . of this consent order, request

that the Kane County Circuit Court decide the

propriety of Burlington's decision

.

f .

If

Burlington proposes to remediate the site,

including the soil and groundwater, the notification

required in Section VII C .3 .c

. above, must also

20

---

g .

include for

review and approval, a work plan for

implementation of the selected remedial activity

.

The work plan shall detail all soil and groundwater

remedial activities to be performed at the site and

the date(s) on which all such activities will be

implemented . The Work Plan shall also propose the

site closure criteria for the plaintiff and Agency

approval

. Such approval shall not be unreasonably

withheld .

i .

If the plaintiff accepts the work plan for

implementation of selected remedial activities

required in paragraph VII .C .3

.f

. above,

Burlington shall implement the work plan in

accordance with the schedule contained therein .

If the plaintiff objects to any recommended

activity, or requires any additional activity

or work to be performed by Burlington, it shall

provide Burlington with a detailed statement as

to the reasons for its objections, including

the specific type of information which the

plaintiff deems Burlington did not provide in

the work plan, or the specific activity or work

Burlington is required to perform .

Within thirty (30) ,

days of receipt of any work plan

disapproval or modification, Burlington shall submit

a

revised work plan to the plaintiff which

incorporates the modifications required by the

plaintiff, or shall invoke the Dispute Resolution

21

---

4 .

provisions of

Section

A177„ ,

haiow .

22

If

Burlington

fails to initiate the Dispute

PPesoluticn

procedures

within the thirty (30 ; day

time period

specified

herein, Burlington

shall be deemed to have

agreed

to

the sne fied modifications .

h .

In the event chat the Dispute Resolution provision

of paragraph VII .F . herein, is invoked, within

thirty (30) days from

the date off the resolution of

the dispute, Burlington shall provide to the

plaintiff a revised work plan consistent with the

results of the Dispute Resolution, addressing

plaintiff's comments . Plaintiff shall have thirty

(30) days to review this revised work plan,

i .

Beginning thirty (30) days after Burlington

commences the soil and groundwater remediaticn

activities, and monthly for six (6) months and

quarterly thereafter until the completion of all

such remediation activities, Burlington shall

provide to the plaintiff and the Agency reports of

the progress of all remediation activities being

conducted at the site .

j

Burlington shall initiate and complete all soil and

groundwater remediation activities in accordance

withithe requirements of the plaintiff-approved Work

Plan and in accordance with any and all schedule

contained therein

.

project

"Cl nsP-Duut" Renoir

a .

Subject to Section VLL

.C_3 .d . and e, above, not

---

later than sixty (60) days

of the completion

of all

remedial activities at the

site, including

soil

and

groundwater remediation,

Burlington shall

prepare

and submit to the plaintiff and the Agency a

project "close-out" report

. This report shall

include at a minimum the following

:

i .

A summary of all data required to be collected

pursuant to this Consent Order, including

sampling data from the soil and the groundwater

monitoring wells .

ii . A certification by an Illinois Registered

Professional Engineer that the requirements

pursuant to this Consent order have been met

consistent with the objectives of the Consent

order, including the achievement of the Agency-

approved closure criteria

. The certification

shall also include his/her conclusion(s)

regarding the condition of the site, including

the soil and groundwater .

iii

. A compilation of each written report previously

prepared and provided to the plaintiff pursuant

to Section VI .C .3 . above .

iv

. All laboratory reports and

bdriiig logs

referenced in the data surmnary required herein

.

b .

Plaintiff shall have ninety (90) days to review and

provide

comment (s) on the project "close-out" report

required herein

. The plaintiff may extend this time

for review

for a

period not to exceed thirty (30)

23

---

days,

by notitying Furl

tc:-, in

writing prior to

the expiration of the .initial

(s0)

day

review

period .

c .

Within seven (7) days

following the completionn of

its review, the plaintiff shall notify Burlington in

writing whether

plaintiff accepts or rejects the

project "close-out" report .

d .

If the plaintiff accepts the project "close-out"

report provided by

Burlington, the report shall then

be filed by the parties with this Court as an

amendment to this Consent order, within fourteen

(14) days of the date of the acceptance

notification .

e .

If the plaintiff rejects the project "close-out"

report provided by Burlington it shall provide

Burlington with a detailed statement as to the

reasons for its rejection, including any

insufficiency found in the evaluation of the

remediation activities conducted on and off-site and

the completeness of such remediation, the specified

type of information which the plaintiff deems

Burlington did not provide in the report or other

deficiencies contained therein

. Plaintiff reserves

its right to seek judicial intervention pursuant to

section VII .F . below to resolve any dispute

regarding the project "close-out" report .

D .

Certificationand Reports

1 .

All certifications,

correspondence(s), documents,

24

---

notifications, reports, plans, scope of work, studies, and any other

documentation required by this Consent Order shall be submitted in

writing and sent by certified mail or any other form of mail

delivery which records the date of receipt, to the plaintiff and the

Agency at the addresses which appear below or to such other

addresses which the plaintiff and the Agency

may hereafter designate

in writing .

John Waligore

Assistant Counsel

Illinois EPA

2 .0 . Box 19276

Springfield,

2200 Churchill

IL

Road62794-9276

Stan Komperda

Bureau of Land

Illinois EPA

2200 Churchill Road

Springfield, . IL 62794

/E~'sd4'12 0 "s'c

.fLLil11J

.1

UJ(.[I./ 4K I'( :

RoseMarie Cazeau

Senior Assistant Attorney General

'Environmental Bureau

Illinois Attorney General's office

Chicago,

100 W . Randolph

Illinois

Street,11th

60601

Flr

.

Michele Niermann

Assistant State's Attorney

Kane County State's Attorney's

Office

Kane County Judicial Center

37 W 777 Route 38, Suite 300

St . Charles, IL 60175-7535

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Dennis Ahlberg

Howard Chinn, P

.E

.

Emergency Response Unit

Chief Engineer

Illinois EPA

Illinois Attorney General's office

2200 Churchill Road

Springfield

. IL 62794

100 W . Randolph Street, 11th Flr

.

Chicago, IL 60601

2 .

All documents

correspondences to be submitted to Burlington pursuant to this

Consent Order shall be sent to :

including plans, approvals and all other

Michael L_ Sazdanoff, Esq.,

Greg Jeffries, Manager

Kenneth J_ Wysoglad & Associates Environmental Operations

Suite 1002a .

Burlington Northern Railroad Co_

2200 West Monroe Street

4105 Lexington Avenue

Chicago, Illinois 160606

North Arden Hills, MN 55126

Elizabeth Hill

Law Department

Burlington Northern Rail Co

.

3800 Continental Plaza

777 Main Street

Fort Worth, TX 76102

25

1

P,?

---

~r~.15s~IL

;n~sisr_

Burlington and Southern Pacific

shall

cease and desist from

violation of the Act, any and all of 35 111

. Adm.- Code, Subtitle

c,

and any and all federal laws and regulations except as specifically

provided in this Consent Order . Burlington

shall at all times

properly operate and maintain its site and take all reasonable

measures to prevent releases

which

violate the Act and

the Board's

Air Pollution Regulations,

accordance with the Compliance Plan

set forth in Section

V_r_r .C .

F .

Dispute Resolution

The parties shall use their best efforts to resolve all

disputes or differences of opinion arising with regards to this

Consent order, informally

and in good faith

. If, however,

disputes arise concerning this Consent order which the parties

are unable to resolve informally, either party may, by written

motion, request that an evidentiary hearing be held before the

Kane County Circuit Court to resolve the dispute between the

parties .

Burlington shall have the

burden of persuasion, by a

preponderance of the evidence, on all issues concerning the

activities required in Sections VII

.C.2

., VII .C.3 . and VII

.C .4 .

of this Consent Order

. Except as specifically provided

herein

and in section VII .G

. below, the rules of civil procedure shall

govern these proceedings

.

26

---

F2

c~~1 7eure

l

.

Force Majeure for

purposes of this

Consent order

is

defined

as any

event

arising

from causes beyond

the control

of

Burlington

which delays

or prevents the performance of any

obligation under this Consent Order

. "Force Majeure" shall not

include increased costs or expenses associated with performance

of the obligations under this Consent Order .

2 .

When an event occurs which will delay the timely

completion of any obligation under this Consent Order, whether or

not caused by a

force majeure event, Burlington shall promptly

notify the plaintiff and the Agency in writing within forty-eight

(48) hours of the occurrence of the event

. Within ten (10) days

of the occurrence of the event which Burlington contends

will be

responsible for a delay, Burlington shall also provide to the

plaintiff and the Agency in

writing,

the reason(s) for and

anticipated duration of such

delay,

the measures taken and to be

taken by Burlington to prevent or minimize the delay, and the

timetable for implementation of such measures . Failure to

provide the 48-hour notice and/or provide the 10-day follow-up

written explanation to the plaintiff and the Agency in a timely

manner, shall constitute

a waiver of any claim of force majeure .

3 .

If within thirty (30) days of the date of Burlington's

48-hour notification, the plaintiff

agrees that a delay is or

will he attributable to a force majeure event, the parties shall

modify the relevant schedules to provide such additional time as

may be necessary to

allow

the completion of the specific

obligation

.

27

---

If the

plaintiff and Burlington cannot agree whether

the reason forr

the delay was a force majeure event, or whether

the duration of the delay is or will be warranted under the

circumstances, Burlington may invoke the Dispute Resolution

provisions of paragraph VII .F

. of this Consent Order

. However,

Burlington invoking the Dispute Resolution provisions of Section

VII

.F

. is not in and of itself a force majeure event

. Burlington

has the burden of proving force majeure by a preponderance of the

evidence .

H .

Rightt of Fntrv

In addition to any other authority, the Agency, its

employees and representatives, and the plaintiff his agents and

representatives, in accordance with constitutional limitations,

shall have the right of entry into and upon Burlington's site

which

is the subject of this Consent order, at all reasonable

times, with twenty-four (24) hours notice, for the purposes of

carrying out inspections including taking photographs, collecting

samples, collecting information, and enforcing the terms of this

Consent Order .

The individuals conducting any inspections of the site shall

make all reasonable attempts to ensure that inspection activities

will not impede the safe and efficient operation of rail traffic

at the site

. Further, the individuals conducting the inspections

will comply

with reasonable site safety rules and regulations in

effect at the site at the time of such inspections

. A copy of

Burlington's Safety Rules and Regulations were provided

to the

plaintiff .

28

---

Nn

less than

thirty (30) days prior to

any transfer

by

Burlington

of an ownership

interest and/or control

in

the

Burlington's

site,

Burlington shall notify the

plaintiff

and the

Agency of the transfer, as provided in Section VII

.D.1 .

Burlington shall also notify the transferee of this Consent Order

and provide to the transferee a copy of this Consent

Order .

Burlington shall include in any agreement or contract for such

transfer a provision requiring the transferee to implement the

compliance plan contained in Section

VII

.C . herein . in

any

event, Burlington shall remain responsible for the completion of

all activities specified herein .

CovenantNotro Sue

1 .

~7-uthern Pacifi-Q

Upon receipt of Southern Pacific's payment of a $85,000

.00

penalty jointly with Burlington and commitment to refrain from

future violations of the Act, the plaintiff or State covenants

not to sue or bring any civil, judicial or administrative action

against Southern Pacific for known violations of the Act which

were the subject matter of the Consent Order herein

. In the

event the $85,000

.00 penalty is not paid, the State shall be

released from this covenant not to sue .

Further, nothing in this Consent Order shall be construed as

a waiver by the plaintiff of thee right to redress future

violations of the Act, the Board's regulations, or this Consent

Order, or to obtain penalties with respect thereto

.

2 . BU n4 on

Upon receipt of Burlington's payment of a $0"5,000

.00 penalcy

29

---

jointly with Southern Pacific and the

payment of

past

costs

of

$1,430 .55

and

the actions Burlington has taken

to date,

the

completion

of all actions

required pursuant to this Consent Order

and commitment to reimburse the plaintiff its future response and

oversight costs and to refrain from

future violations of the Act,

the plaintiff or State covenants not to sue or bring any civil,

judicial or administrative action against Burlington for known

violations of the Act which were the subject matter of the

Consent Order herein . In the event any money owing the State is

not paid and/or Burlington refuses or fails to perform to

completion all actions required by this Consent Order, the State

shall be released from this

covenant not to sue .

Further, nothing in this Consent Order shall be construed as

a waiver by the

plaintiff of the right to redress future

violations of the Act, the Board's regulations, or this Consent

Order, or to obtain penalties with

respect

thereto .

K .

Enforcement

of Consent Order

Upon

entry of this Consent Order, any party hereto, upon

motion, may reinstate these proceedings solely for the purpose of

enforcing the terms and conditions of this Consent Order . This

Consent Order is a binding and enforceable Order of the Court and

30

---

may

he enforced as

such through any and all available

means .

PECPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS

ex rel . JA,MFS E

. RYAN,

attorney General of the

State of Illinois

MATTHEW J

. DLNN, Chief

Environmental Enforcement Division

Date

:

WILLIAM

Date :

1/3

J~[D By :

Date : 11Qlyf

By :

. SEITH, Chief

Environmental Bureau

Assistant Attorney General

ex rel . DAVID R, AKEMANN,

State's

Kane

CortyAttorney

Ill nois

of

By

: AATR

Chief,

IA'JOHNONLOCivil

,

DivisionS-

ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL

CY l

Date :

By

PROTECTION

0 PH E . SVOBODA

General Counsel

BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD

COMPANY

31

Title :

____

SOUTHERN PACIFIC

TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,

subsidiary of SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL

ORATION,

and SPCSL Corp .

DUNN

Entered :

FE

Q, (9,

Judge

c :\wpwin60\wpdocs\mmisc\rmcco19b

e

---

April 2, :RU 1

Mr. Manic) , F

. Kcrnperda

AE'VI

1 EWER

mm

Projectivlanager

Remedial

Ylu)e rt wfauagcmcnt Sr-ctiun

Illinois Envtronm

r,t-a Protection Agency

2200 Churchill Road

A

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

St. Pull . MO

"All . 19b/

APP 0 9 ?iJU1

(J1) 222-011^7

'10

ti Si ) 2<2-G19"

. ae

ill

: : Site Closure Request, 'O esel i?uel Spill Site - rola, Illinois (Ui'110U 1)190 -J1 ii)

IEPA hic ;dcnt No . 930190

Dear ivtr . IContperda

:

On behalf of he i3urlingion Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF'), Ther nine :-tec

Consulting Corporation (Tennoketec) is providing, additional irttorurltion to the fhinn ;~.

Enviroruuental Protection Agency (ICPA) so that a Site Closure Request an he cortsiderct for the

diesel fuel spill site- lucated in )cola, Illinois (Site)

.

On November 6, 1996, Therm.oRt:tec

submitted a Project Close-Out Report (Repori) for Use Site

.

Tire purpose of

tin: RopUri was io

provide

the 1EPA wiih information hat supported site e osure:

The Report contenis lire

suimnarized below :

Incident summary

Introduction of past submittals

Results of additionall site investigation activities conducted on and off BNSF property to

farther chartcterizc'tiie Site

Description of the selected remedial alternative

Results of the in situ bioremediation pilot study conducted at monitoring wells M\trr-5 and

MIA'- 14

Results of a final groundwater monitoring event conducted on July,1 .5, 1993

A copy of the Project Closeout Report in provided in Attachment A

.

Based on results of the groundwater monitoring event conducted on July 15, 1998, Tier )

Tiered

Approach to Cleanup Objectives (TACO) remediation objectives were not exceeded

. 1 beret, te,1Le:

project closeout request was subirtitted to the IEPA .

FiEGOVED

APP

0 5 2051

---

10/10/200-

April

2 .

200 I

Page 2

On several r,cr„s:ans

rice slbrnit'tu1 of the Project Closeout Report, ii ;ii iCewe has lil

;

p 2

crc,e

monitoring wells

MV)-5

and MW-I4 for the presence of petroleum produC . 1'e(ruleum product

not observed during

:,ny of the i :tspcciiant

laased ua tlrc Itsulls of the groundw'ateer

;

;ampling conducted in 1998 that indicates groundw nor x")

longer exceeds the Tier I TACO standards and inspections of MW-5 and MW-14 that indicates

petroleum product hats been recovered to the extent practical in both viell

::, Th\ecuiol;etec

requcxu

that the Site he closed .

If you have any questio s, please call me at (651) 222-0841 or

W . thug Jefiin:s of E?

•I

SF . .t

(763)782-3483 .

Sincerely,

ThcrrnoRetec Cunsulting Corporation

Daryl lt

. 11cck

En'virurunental Engineer

D1tB :srrw

Attachments

cc :

G . Jeffrie:, BNSF

Al: -: HW)i

fC'S

F:\PI :OJ[C'11Mf7N5 F\i UOn1'I b'U4~COI1V":11

;EGULti 101<01"PCR

.000

---

63n752470

b5f

..

AI

.6r:E/20co

1F :23

PAGE

l

I

S,- ,-

ATTACHMEWYA

Project MsG-Oui ROPOit

NovembxA'G, 1098

SATO

---

W lei, :

i':'Ovc

:ithci 6, 1998

NIS

. Rose Marie Cu eau

Sen or Assistant Attorney Ccneral

Eli vironlrlerlcal BurClu

Illinois Ateoritev Cenc:rai's Office

100 W. Randolph SLreet, 11th Floor

Chicago, Illinois 60601

1t1: :

f-rojt:ctt,losr:-OtitRcpcrrt,

Diesel Fuel Spill S

:cc-L

o

l:., Illinois (3-1 90S-7U0

)'

1EI A lr! id flit

Ntariber

: 92,3190

Dew" M

;

. C'azeau :

Orl behalf of The

Burlington

Northern and Sanca Fe railway

Company (BNS =), RL1'I .C

is provviding t

his

project: close-out report (Report) to the State of lllulois and the IUiaui :,

Pollution Control Agency (ILPA) for the diesel fuel spill site located in Lola, Illinois

(Site)_ This Repun was completed in accordance wilt the Consent Order clued

February 5, 1996, ri :lated to the spill site. The Report provides a suiiunary o Site

remediation and monitoring activities . Base-d on the results of the rermediation aired

rrlonitoling activities, RETE.C

: recommends that the Site be closed .

The Report contains the following Atta clunents :

Attachment A

- Tables and Figures

.!',. taeluneot 13

-.Analytical

Laboratory Reports

S1T1;

; BAC1CCROUN1)

On January 20, 1993, a head-on collision between an eastbound Southern Pacific

and a westbound LNSF train resulted in a diesel fuel spill estimated al. 5,300 to 6,80 ,,)

gallons born

damaged diesel tanks on locomotives of both trains

. Response efforts

•.vcre

immediately focused on removing the injured train crews from the locomotives . Once

access was permitted to the Site, it was determiired that three of the seven locomotives

ii .dolved

ill the accident lead damaged fuel tanks tat spilled diesel fuel .

Si . Peel, kN ;SIL 1

~ci_` 1) ')'l7 .7

:;-, I

---

iNGbentut :r 6, 1L'93

_,L D1'-L~(IH! e5

~1~11C Slil lti IUC;CeIi lll l'~a1lC A~Ol1Y1LV, 11I1n01J

nOrCkICaSC Ut Illllai ;_l :daltl ~~~.

:~'( C>!~ 1 :011 1~~ : i

11,,h;!,1 R- 1ckaige. the SIft is locatedl iii Scction 13, Y ov ikshil)

;f0/

)LA

ita:11,C L

i

a td

showwn oil l'i~ure 1

.

i_ tt

)^nuary 2Q 1993, LN%1 c:ncl

tilcii I-o1lU

:

;cu7rS

arrived :.i the Jut

Lo 1>izi ;atc

einci ~c- i cy spill tesporis: servitUs . A surnx11ary of the tespoll5

.: :1 :

:1.1V111i;~

15 pICJVidt :d 1 :1

the document Status 1ti:port, Diesel I-uel Spill Site,

Eola, lllinois dated MML_rdt '1906

( ;Lal . ;

f&eporc) . The Stank i~eporL was cornpieLcd in accordance with Llie Coltsc

:ut G tier.

In 1993 and 1995, soil and groundwater investigations were conducted cu detcrntine thee

extent of impact caused by the diesel fuel release •

Results of the soil arid grolrr.cha:lter

investigations are provided in the Status Report . The 1993 investigation ~.v:as t,undu :0/.c !

to define the extent of impacts caused by the diesel fuel spill . The 1.995 artv~sti adun

was conducted to further define subsurface impacts, in particular, LILC

area brluc cia

.

mainline railroad hacks .

A1~L3k 1 it1N~~

S IE INV-LS T IGATION

Soil

As part of the Consent Order, additional subsurface investigation ac ;tivitices

r

conducted on and off BNSF property at the Site . Additional subsurlacc

: 11;Ve

;

;L1L ti -!t

activities are described in the document

Work Plan, Diesel iuel

Spill Site, 0111, Illinois

dated March 1990

. in lvlay 190/6, four soil borings, desigetatr_cl SB-1 tkuoudit SB- l, tot- x

conducted to determine subsurface soil impacts . These four borings were corlduc:ue a n t

BNSE property

. Locations of the soil borings are shown on Figure 2 . Soil saipies . : ::rc:

collected from each of the soil boings and analyzed for benzene, toluen ::, ylbc c:e&

t

and xylenes ('BTEX) attd polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Pill-ls) •

In March 1997, RLTEC conducted the off-site portion of 'the additional subsur ac

;:

investigation

. Eleven soil borings were completed along the southern property bound:.x y .

Four of the soil borings were completed

as monitoring wells . Soil samples were c illecteed

from soil borings SB-5, 513-6, MW-23, and MW-24 and analyzed for i, i X and l AIL .

Soil sample results of the on- and off-site subsurface investigation are provided in Table

1

. None of the soil samples collected during the on-and off-site SubslIltsct ii

v

tlj t t.a:, I

exceeded the Tier 1 corrective action objectives presented in the 11

;1'1't

gi6clalnc

:f,

document Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) .

Crouridtvaccr

Groundwater samples were also collected during the two investigation events

. In ivlr.y

1996, groundwater samples were collected front rigor itoringwel s MW-2

: Ibl1;'-'. , A W-'7:,

MW-6, IAW-7, lvfW-S, MW-9, MW-10, and MW-17

. In April 1997, grouiad

::atrr

samples were collected from MW-2, MW-3, MWA, MVV-9, MW-10, IvIW-'31, tv1VWi-22,

---

rEi

1 0 /?

Ngveml-, r

u, i

91i

Page 3

NIW-23, and

MW-2!1.

Sample results 're provided in 1' I;lc 2 . i;as

i1 on i~sults .11 ;I

groundwater investigation, several paramtLers exceeded their '1

ruff I I ACO coireCliec :

action olijecaivcs

. !n riddiriun, p iruleulii product was

ELill

ii\vlw`i-5 ,.nd N1W-id:: :atld ire the rrco .cry tr iidt sump .

Results of die lvLry 1996 on-site lnve xigat.ion ,,ere reporci:d to die State

: i,l lllirio : : .nd

the IE.PAiri L e do ument Ft'clsibiliiy curry, Diesel herl S will Sit , 1 ic, '!lhiui (;,

lily

Study) dated June 1)96 . Results of the March 1997 off-site investigatiail :tie rclxii,etu

to the State of Illinois and tie ILPA in a loiter report dated )iln 3, 1997 .

SITE ltEN4*E,DIA`CDN

Using results of the 1993, 1995, arid 1996 soil and groundwater iiivesiiga'tiorrs, 1:

conducted a study to derernnine closure Criteria for the Site

--lid

'co select a rerni :C'li

alternative to achieve closure . Results of the study are presented iii the i=e : S Beret,

Study . Cleanup objectives for soil and groundwater were detenniiled using th 1'LP±

TACO guidance nlanual

. Sire-specific closure criteria developed in the f=easibility Study

are provider ire Talk!;

Several technologies were scice1'ned during plep2ra'tlorl of die Feasibility Study .

remedial alternativ that was selected to reme latee the Site is described t elow

:

Operating the ehlsnng recovery trench

CU collect free product arld prevent

m:e

product ront entering the drainage ditch

.

Iristafl.inga

recovery well where 1'[tonitorirlD \,ell MW-14 is Located

arid

placillir :

a hydrophobic collection sump to recover' free product

.

Monitoring the progress of intrinsic biorernediation through, groundwater

monitoring .

Recognizing the high-traffic railroad usage of the Site as a land use restriction

.

The existing recovery trench had been installed shortly after the incident occurred

. hi

April 1997, the IEPA accepted the remedial alternative selected in the Feasibility Study

in addition to conducting a in situ biorernediation pilot study, which is suuu -iiancteii

below.

Petroleum product recovered in the recovery tench sump was removed xwiCe iruirith

yt

Recovery trench operation was suspended in )u

.ly 1997, following iE,PA approval, duc

to the insignifica

:rlt amount of petroleum product being recovered- Absorbent pilau vs

were placed in the recover' trench sump to recover residual petroleum Irroddut .

---

lu ie/'." n

\JC2i1'~l)Cl

6,

f

9%~ll

121 1L

so CDIIiucCtil loonthly iitS'pccciolls Lli ie

;Ulci 1,? 1 U :t!r;t 1i OlUi1 .

nhiiiituring wL

115

. /i,U$.}rllarit

boctus were placed in !nonaorj l~rwells 1.vtW-~} :

illl l :v'1 r; `.'

tO 'tli.UV~_r

.lie pli

;W~ pecroI`li1ri '1 todttia .

ltc: absuLCU1L L uui

al.1,i 1)=lli,1'2 :. 1

re 1 l Trl duc'lrio etch tl"lurttllly 1ns Cuoi ct luoltitonri` i;A t'lit .

As dcscribed .,hove, l io~nd'water sanll.~les were collected ill 1996 :,na t 9l)7

fto1n a . :l

Sice :il ;,

.lito.-inb wells

. Sample esulLs arc provided in'1'able l-

1lv 3-1T V T3'i O'12LN1' I)IATION PfLOT STUDY

The objective of the

: in sins biorernediatiori

-pilot study was to evaluate the eir ci ul

increasing Subsurface: o:.ygeil level on the degradation of residual petroleum product al.

monirotintg wells MIN-5 and MW-14 . In June 1997, a slurry of

Ox,) en

ReiL- -c

Compound (ORC) .,,as injected in die subsurface over an area appro:auiately 20 fee, i,

y

20 feet around each well . 7.•h e ORC seas installed using a high pressure irycciio .ri SVScclii

ae

all

interval of 3 to 7 feet belorw the ground surface.

l :i SCil 1-ili7rtrnediat:~i :: gerbil-lilance viaS monitored monthly for six r:iond-ls by CCIi'~~ 1 :1`;

water and air samples at monitoring wells NMW-5 and lvlkV-14 . 'file Two

rrii,T'iltorcd from Julie 1997 to January 1998 . Performance mlnitoririg resulLs

provided to the iEi

in a sununary lecier report dated April 7, 1998

. 111

the sultunar}'

lr Lter report, RETLC recommended inspecting Site monitoring wells Li-monthly fur

Six.

rriontts to determir

:c if petr'oleurn product returned to MW-5 acid M\V-1 • if petrol wu

product was not observed at the end of six months, 11 Site n :onitoiing, ovens, includin ,

MW-S and MW-14, would be sampled to determine if groundwater

inc--t

the

approvc.d

closure criteria listed in the Feasibility Study . Petroleum productt wa nor

observed front September 1997 through February 1993

.

tiff? `t,OSifi7 i VP1UZV 'ION

On July

15, 1998, monitoring wells NMW-1, MW-3, MW-6, MW-9, MW--10, MW-14,

and MW-21 through 1\:1W-24

were sarnpled. Monitoring well MVV-5 s•rss sampled ii i

July 30, 1998

. Sarrlples were analyzed for '13M and PAi-fs, Sample results ar

e

provided

in

Tables 2 and -,i.

Groundwater at the Site has been remediaied to meet closure

criteria

set torch, in

Feasibility Study and approved by the IE13A based on tire following :

Results of the July 1998

groundwater sampling event do not exceed 'i ier 1

TACO corrective action objectives, except for benzo (a) anchracene at

n onitoring swell MW-23

•

---

N(j

t 1 1 L), : J" 6, 19 )P

.

L,

v

I

y

.-

!'t:utj'L1rn p;U;i,:a

11,1s not L.: n ouctrvcd tit

WC-113 IV'1V- S

:rci

l'1'' d l

OY

i!t LIZ!' ttCOVt:'I I.119I1Ch sump since

:

SC I-) CC Illi:cr f9i/ .

NP

J

Beyu,u (Et) hl11lh'

; :,Ln bA

s (d,-cu-Led

at 0 .66 trdcioblanis peC 1irCr (up/I,) if i II .)iu2o!i

,

I1

Jv'- : .

Like l

lei

-CO

n oce 1Gi hnzc(C) l?tira(Vl

1. l ;

COCEc:CtiVC

acuubleuv

ut~L

. 1;?svcl u .i t tch-pit~

.te col;vcrsaLiun'wirh Mt . ,,LS

L:

.utlc;y Kolnper~a 0 t th:

:

(ill

tC"

'

St(~tc;lh,bl-i 4, 1))0, a

htct /. IACG

evaluatloit'wUUI,not I)c 1LCl u_ :ca ul the Lc! t- 1) \

anthtacenl c:Xlk=edence at

MW-21,

therefore, kl_, J : C reconifflericis

Li'te

Site GC clusc:

with no fu ther action

. Upon approval of this recommendation to close the :,Sit(

till..:

rnonicuiirtg wells will be sealed and the recovery trench decommissioned .

If you have arty questions concerning this matter, plea

; e contact either of us at (551)

222-0841 or lvMr

. Jinn Cunningham of BNSF at (612) 782-3=x83 .

Sincerely,.

1~

: 2Li' Ui 1GN Tf:

1g1-1OLOGIIS, INC

.

Uaryl

ll L ci:, 1'. h.,

CIlt hvI

1'.•a F. I'utzier

L_

ratw~roluncru.al

Engineer

Senior Hydrogeologist

l hcreby Certify that CPUs p1ar1, s'pcclrlc,d0

t1,

or i"eJOrt Was pl' pare 1 b y 1110 or l nd i

I:iV

direct supervision and

chat

I am a duty Registered Professional

EngirtEngineer under the 1 ",

:,

of the State of ii4)ois

.

Kurt N4:

t

eisei, P

. E.

Environmental Engineer

Rernediaticit edlnologies, lnc

.

f/~6

St . Paul, Minnesota

1.

Attachinents

cc: J

. \ Jaligore - IEE'A

S

. Kornperda - 1EPA

D

. Ahlberg -

IEPA

NI

. Nierntarut -

Kane County State Attorney's Office

1-1 . Chinii, i'

. IS. -

Illinois

.Attoritey General's Office

M

. Sazdanoff, Esq

. -

Kenneth ).

Wysoglad &Associates, w/o enclosuL

1

. Cnllrunghant, f;NSY

- _)n2204f t)16

Registration 1\!UalLcf

Fdt9tOjECI vUItJSFUYOS .CLOSt11iLU)It1Al'/

"

---

oI

- 95

-niyv,

fi-

_ L_

NP1

S M!LI 73nr SJNIIo

^_]!!-~IN'!SN:I7!IIMUN

Y1119N7N117

.J*•. I N717 :

1=rv_;_o

ONc:au 7N7S V

11a, li}rA73N . . A

ltls. o

3SIO .1

L1

,1nrc: Nm7771O0 •N l.

~9

71?f. 11,1106,01,

'/l

'

'1'O' TnID!INLX .1

yL

Y

Fog MOOS O

311,1 33113

'!3p7f, ANOOVUNOONA

LOACLOl Alll ONWMI -I-1•P I•I•I

'I

3WIOIWIi

Onll,p7

NuuvlNYf 'J

`

A

V

ci-mn 4•

o-BSV

xY-mn

-

--

'

I7

2-es

R

I ,'-

\ X~1 pN•n l

/

1l

-"

ui jnee

$AM^,\

fI

---

T

abic 4 -1kna[ytical Soil Results

t4olel :

; .E :, nrantrelicn !e?OnecInvc.n

:n,

c

!Sip=;f!

err,-:e

no!

tc :'di< Li : py- :f .' Ii'1,':

nc:e .~ritt-d

c?e:' bc..cinc_ Fmt

~C:arrpic Locaticn

fiemplc Dept ::

((ec(4

:iamp(v Date

f`ars rnEter

S E ~ I

i to

U '

4!S

i

SE-Z

a to E

0?fi4(PC

S5-3

[o 4

(

CF1i11°G f

i-1

Io 5

( 'i-1EC

5E-4

k fo G

:li21SF

S'E-(:

N'

i-

E (o i0

[

c 4

112197

ii_ : i

I

:'?i

:'tF

I

Polye.cUeArcmas .ic Hydrocarbons

Nzphthaiene

E[

310

<5 .0

!

l0

<1

.2

15

20C!

Nceraphtllp)ene

69

<10

<IO

<IG

<9G

<20

<23

~cc

hcenzphthene

<[0

36

<Io

<10

1<3

36

<2 .2

Pluorene

96

3I0

<2 .0

i2

6-10

`

)00

210

< L%

Fhen n hrene

320

E_`0

0 .90

I

77

1500

170

I

250

G .CS

tn :hceccnc

27

HO

<1 ,0

10

1100

140

65D

6

`Ivofanthene

43

49

<2 .0

9 .

4300

<! .G,

<i .2.

<2 .3

f~}Fenc

150

5IG

<tA

32

1200

160

S60

<C

. _ a s

Ucnzo(ajaathraeene

<3,0

<'s 0

<5

.0

<1G

<4 .1

9&

I90

241

Chrosene

s!

eL0

<1 .0

<I_0

900

<0 .21

2200

(_'•^_C

Benzo(b)fluoranthenc

32

<2 .0

<2 .0

<2 .0

<1_5

55

ISO

<0 .95

Cenzc(k)(13oranchene

35

9 .I

<[0

1

.6

I

<IA

<0 .21

<0 ._4

<! . -'

£enzo(a)pvrere

50

<!

.0

< ; .U

5 .6

(

<3 .0

<0,63

15C

<1_,

C :Ecrao{a,6jzr h :zcene

<2 .0

120

<2.0

i

<2 .0

<3

c

<0 ."0

cC• . L2 .

<1 6

5crzo(Q,h,i)pendere

<1 .0 I

<I .B

<1.0~

<[ .0

<2 .0

<0 .62

I

c0S

ir,ccno((,2,2-c,djpvrenc

34

<LC

<! .il

Zt

c1 .S

<'2 .31

IOU

i

."'.

Lit?: Ccm.cound^

Ecnzene

<St

f

<SO

<U .S

c5Q

<12

<9

.C

I

Toluene

^_,100

<50

<0 .5

<`O

4 9

9 .'

92

3'~'ibenizr.c

'

<_OG +

1 .

<0

.5

<20

160

<6

_c0

r? C,

i;~rrnes

j_

-,,50G

<~0

<I

~,

<50

3iG

c6`

I

5r; G

Cr

.

---

Table 2 - Craun~wzter Q.na[vftca[ R su[(~t

<: Pxran;a ctrnet4ecccr4ILorabtvcrtrcctncr6Lecttaion nQt

S udtd v; I .cs tt4iatc Nr.n:uu

o:rttntrlLcn [r,ctc Clan Cbxt 1 Tics I

G;asndwtrcr

C re'ivcAclcn 05jtnicc.

1It : ^taTicr I CcntcivcAcJoi Obieni .-ch : . bt.r• t :rL u,bS

[cr tnt,CR4 Yt Zr

:CcCr

.

..c'n,lonnc_

£zmpit Cats

one (we-AcUor,

Drbiectlees

MW-i

1719uf55

w02

. NA -Z

05/idTS

;

OUC2JC7

L, . ;- .

F

16X- ..

I,, ; .- .

0rv4I

c

I GC!GZT?

CT(1,Ji

r-AH by Muhod 2310 (uE'L)

I

NaphJtalene

29

69

`

32

19

^-.2

}

cC.U"r

<0_03E

!

`.

1-h4e[hyl Nzphthakne

NZP.

41 .2

I

1.:5

NS

NS

' T5

I

o,,.G4

2-Methy!Naphthalenc

NA

12 .4

f

l!S

NS

HIS

NS

<0 .034

rcenaphthvlene

NA

<0.6

[3

IZ

21 .0

<609

<G .6

<1 .0

Acenaphthene

2,100

4

0.47

<0.092

<1 .0

I

<0.093

<0.04I

<i .0

1IoucenE

1103

Z .7

1 .

4.9

02

I 0173

<0 .071

<0.13

PhEnan •_h &rLe

NA

5.t

0.51

15

0.27

I

C.5

<3 .032

<U

.050

/mtl;taccnc

10,500

<0.029

0.33

<0.0079

0.051

l

0

.093

<0c :c

<0.10

Fluorar.[hcne

1,400

<0.04

20.10

<0.017

<0.10

0 .3

(

<0.04

< GA 0

Pytene

1,050

O.0

.0610

<0.0059

0.061

0 .18

<0.01

!

<3.05(',

Scnzo(a)anthraccne

0.65

0.05

<0.050

;;,, s=:- a. _:

<

0.050

0.089

<0 .030

<0050

Chry'scne

7.5

G.00

<0.050

<3.0090

0.03E

I

0-11

cO COS I <G.C_fC'

$eazo(b)(Iuotaalhenc

0.9

<0.062

<0.10

<0.018

<0.10

0 .11

0 .202

<C .l .`.

Genzo(k)Uuerznlhtene

0,85

<0.071

<0050

<0.0091

0.011

0.053

c!7I

<0.020

Benzc(a)pt~ene

2.

<0.061

<0.050

<0.0000

6.035

0 .14

<0.061

<C.050

Dibenze(a,h)anthracene

1

.5

<0A2;

<Q 10

<0 .029

<0 .10

0.037

_0 .022

<O .10

8enzo(g.h.i)pegdece

PTA

<0.024

<0.10

<0.022

<0

.10

0

.1E

<0 .;24

<3 .10

irdene(I,Z,2Ipyrene

2,15

<0.046

<0 .10 I

<0.013

0.02

0.34

_0.046

ETEX by 1Jel-hod 8020 (ug/L)

1,

ncnzere

25

2 .9

<3.5

1 .7

c0

.

5

<0.0

<1 .i

<

I

Toluerc

2:500

<1 .0

<3.5

<50

<3.5 j

<015

_IL

1

l

L[L :;•i

ccnzcne

j

!,G00

5.5

6.1

10

<0_5

; <~ • . 33

<LI

<3'.5

i

Xr;enes

L0,000

7.2

4.1

< 14

< L0

< 1 .4

< 1 .0

---

Tatfe Z--C.raundwaterAnalytical Results (Cc n't)

nc :u

:

c Fr::,rtternttie:ecad

. .'.eraboveMr.,

Qdctccd nR0;it

S...:dn_ t: i ut! Walt c;tmete*. mnrm7 .4en grnter Lh.n C12 :3 It T

Goen1•aaet Co :r cth'e,tr

c

0 jee__.

. ...: NoTv.I9ortrcc:cAC::cfObkcJvc ::l-v- rr:Liun,y

Iari :,d :atcd pcr ;zuct.

.r

I k

onricttng V ef11_

! SE

.

.mpla6zts

I

..

(

_

-c,rcQU •e /.trim

I

66)€cOvcs.

I

,'t

; ~

t

O4(G%J5T j

W

.W-G

j

0

rgrc,.-,

.J .f

/

(,,.,-G

M1''-r

Oii56!SE

C~,tUSC

E[

165154!I

L.P7.g:6

j

LZ,S'-C-

i . :SCSe

}f(:

tr ;i_ • : 7

PAW by Metcod O'sLC luoA>)

j

jt

ht:pl

•, thalcnc

I

)

39

I <0 .005

<G .`J

i <0.0`e

cG.50

<C.`0

53

1-A4ethylltohthalene

NS

HS

NS

NS

2-MethylN2phthalene

I

n'A

KS

NS

<0.034

US

Us

NS

I'S

l

Acenarhutylc.e

f f,

<0.36

<( .0

<0,6

< .,0

el-0 I <L.G

'33E

f,ccsaphthecc

2,100

I

<0 .002

<1_0

<0.G4I

<1 .0

cL0

j

<1 .0

<,;,OS2

Flctcrene

) d0d

I <0 .0 1.

<C.15

<0.071

<0.10

0 .i

<6a1

Pheaanehrene

NA.

<0.023

<0 .050

<0.032

cO.050

<0 .050

<0 .000 i

'

Aattraccnc

10,500

<0.0379

<(110

<0.029

<G .10

<0.10 I <0.16

i 1.07

Fluorantheea

1,400

<0.0L7

<3.10

<004

<0- to

<0.10

Pytene

1.050

6_016

<0,1 0

<O 01

<0.050

<0.050

<0.35C

cenzo(a)ant scene

0.65

<0.G078

<0.050

<0.008

<0.050

<0.050 I

<G 056

0.098

Chrysene

7 .5

<6 .G090

<0.050

<0.005

<3.050

<0.053

j <3 .G_`0 f C .11

Genm(b`fwcranthene

0.9

<0.OI22

<G.10

<0.CG2

<0 .13

<0.13 j <3.10

C . :S

Ocnze(k)Oucrznthzene

0.65

<0 .0091

<0.050

<0.071

<0 .050

<0.350 j ' 6.0:0

Q;,,re

Gerza(a)pytwc

2

<0_006B

<0.05C

<0.061

<3 .350

<0.050

<O .G50 '~

615

Cibenzohncene

1 .5

<0.029

<0.1.0

<0.023

<0.10

<0 .i0

<3 .10

I Gb.20

Ecnze(t,h,i ;pery•r ene

NA

<0 .022

<0 .10

<0024

<0.I.0

<0 .13

<0.10 I ( .26

rncene{I,2,'i~yrrnt

2.15

<0 .012

<C.IC

<0.046

<0

.10

<0 .I0

<G_ O

i

C. 7

B-

1- EX by Method 0020 (ugt)

I

Gcnzere

25

<0.47

<0.5

<!A

<3.S

<0.`

Toluene

2,500

<0.50

<0.5

c1 .0

<0.5

<3.5

<0.5 j -(_, ; .

6tltymenzen-

1,000

<0.32

<05

<LI

<0,5

<6,5

<3

.5

~Xylenes

L0,000

j c IA

<I_0

_<5 .5

<1_0

<,• . 0

---

Table - Groundwater Analytical Resu((s (Con's)

c F: :nr_trno:dtcercdato : .be••e rd:rcnctddtienloulimia

Shadtd v-.'n •c :

inetc is p-rarcctr tc^.tr:uctlna g~rcr than Class 117!" 1

Crvr V.

: (crCnnccuatdaiouCbjcnivt .

'c 9tc I C;r,t<c''t

6c:cn C! jrc'Jrt h : r hcen vrncli:lrco

IJt,omu'ring \'cel, to

ISample Dale

Z:o :recOve

I

04JeGlves

I

01156 :98

I!Yvr-S

I

I OH{S/S6

I''

:I

_

WAY-1 C'

I

CU62rE1

I

0 -1

WAY-10"16159

I

1

!(1Y i

!

5116'Si

Gl

l?Y.' •z

-,

° ;-rr ~

r

PAH by Method E :10

yeas L1

Naniuhxterc

<O,07C

<0,50

<C067

1

<0 .03t

.`.'

<`'-

1-Methyl

Naphthalene

Nt,

<C .Q'

N,

NS

<0 .04

IC

2-lviethyl Naphtha:cne

\D\

<0 .034

14S

NS

<O .034

1`.'S

i1

L'S

<

P

.cenaph[hylere

NA

<0 .6

<I .0

<0 .30

<0

.6

7c

I

<C-?§

<1 Sc'i

Accna ~r hthen :

2

.100

<O,G4l

<! .`,!

<C.09f

<C .G41 r

11

j

015

<G .^'_ :

Fiourene

t,400 -

<0,071

<0 .10

<0 .021

<0

.071

1

92

0,25

Phcnanthrenc

NJ,

<0

.032

0014

<0 .02E

c0 .032 I 270

`0

d,1GE

Anthraene

10,500

<0 .029

<G .10

0 .01

<0029

44

'

Flucanthene

1,400

<0.04

<0.10

0.079

<0.04

i9

1.l

~SJ

P~rene

1 .050

<G.1

<0-050

0.1 I

0.077

1400

<0.0159

I

0 .19

Benzo(a)anthracene

0.65

<0.008

<0.050

0.049 1

0.066

I

Chryrene

7.5

1 <0.005

<0.G•5 0

<0.009 .3 I C,06a

I

a

<0<0-53.50

<0.0020

I

<0

<0

(

.516

:25

Benxc(b)Ouornnthene

0 .9

I

<0 .062

<0 .I0

0.026 I <0 .062 I <1 .0

<C .cI

<O .2U ; I

Ecnzo(l)r1uoranthrene

O .FS

I

<0

.071

<0,050

0 .044

<0

.07I

i

'O.50

<0 .00r51

i <0 .234

Benzc(a)pprcne

2

! <0 .061

<0

.050

0 .066 I <0061 I 0 .27

<0

.00(5

<0 .2C'C

Dibenzo(a,h)anchrzcene

L5

<

<0023

<Oi0

<0 .029

<0 .323

<! 0

<C0'29 ( <GC'75

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

I\rf.

<0.024

<0,10

0.079

<0.024

<L0

<0.022

<0.07

lndzno(L,2 )p}rene

22 .15

I <0 .046

<0 . 10

0 .13 I

<On46

<1 .0

<c .

1 ;

<0: 2

3TEX by Method E020 (egIL)

Benzene

25

I

<1.1

<0,5

<0

.47

J <1 .1

( .7

c0 .'(7

Toluene

2,500

< 11.0

<0.5

<0.50 I <1 .0

2 c

i

.5

Ethy(bracne

1,000

<1-j

<(1S

<033

<LI

I

5,

0 .06

w!enea

10,000

<2.5

<I0 j

<1.4

cSS

5P

c( .-'

---

Table Z-C~aundrrrate~ knzlvftcs? Resuf(s

(Can`()

ia'ttL^

Ftranmtc : not d¢eeoi ;c c,, ; o .t xferuwcd dtterCi I!t:zt

Shadtd va!uc

tndtcatc prtmeter wr., errauon ptaw

than Clan 11 Tiu I

Crcundt.rcr

C

:•:u-tim

Ac ton CLjett ivc .

v ._

Tin l Cutrtcth

,

rka GSjtcCvt hu born csbNsh :d

:'_plic,ttcik,I ., :t!-'ky _ .

,N,cnttorir.g NeIUO

)

Curectty he ton

~Famp[eDate

GbjcctIves

jupllcatc

0410iJ9i

1.NV-ir

.

0C107_'Si

6T!SS15t

WAY-Z2

M(Gil'F,R,-24•i

WW-ti

C~7G ; : .F

W.W

.24

I FAN by Method 8.210 (ut L)

!

29

22

1

<0.02E

<,'.0G7

1

NSO[lha[cnc

<2

< _C',79

<C.C %;

i

[-Nelhvl Naphthalene

N :\

NS

NS

<r_,

.04

F

: S

<

.u0,

2-Methyl Naphthalenc

NA,

NE

NS

<0,G54

NS

<G

.03i

I

I iS

<G.p

='

f:ccr,zphthylcne

NA

<G .39

<0 .3E

<0

.6

<0 .36

<0 .6

j

<C,i^.

<0.6

AceaaphQta,c

.

2,100

0 .14

1.0

1,15

<0 .091

, .25

I

<0 .094

<f,,r-:!

71eurcne

1,407

0.23

I

0 .44

0 .57

5 .5

i,12

0 .056

<C .07i

Fltenanthrenc

NA

1k30

1 .4

<0.032

2.0

<0.032

I 046

<0

hnthracene

Fiucr nthcnc

10,500

1,400

CIA 1

<0 .017

2 .2

22

<0 .029

0 .7

I

<0 .017

<U 04 .

C,

C,

0 .1 _

I •1•rcne

1,050

<0 .0G5 E

3 .0

0 .4

12

0 .44

0 .22

O fit

Lenzo(a)anthtscentChrysene

07.65.5

<00.022.0090

r':y

<0.0090

rtfl:

0.19

<0.0090

0,13

0-CL_9 l

<O.L35

Gertza(b)Luarzntttene

09

<0

.018 I

<0

.OIE

<0 .06Z

c0A52

<0.O

.S

<0 .062

Een za(k)Cuoraethrene

0 .C5

<0 .0090 I <0-0090

<0.G71 I

0 .4 :

<0.07 L ' 0.025

7 L

0cnzc(z)p;ltue

2

<0,00E7

<0 .00E7

<0 .051

<0 .00E7

<0 .OL•1

0 .0 :5

j

<0

.061

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracent

1 .5

<0 .029

<0.029

<3 .023 I

<0 .029 I

<0 .023 j <0G29 1 <0 .023

Senzo(g^erylene

14A

<0 .022

<C.022

<0 024

<0 .022

<0024

I

<0 .023

c0 .02'

lrdcnc(1,2

.5)pyrcne

2 .15

<CA15

<0 .013

<0046

<0.013

<0 .046

-.-O .0)4 I

< .016

ETE? : by Method 2020 (up/V,

Eenzene

25

<0 .47

<0 .17

<[ .I

<24

I

j

<1 .1 I

<0,47

<1,1

Taiuenc

2.7

4.0

1.1

<25 1

< 1,0

7.4

< LO

Ethylbenzene

1 .000

l 072

0.9

<! .1

<17

<l,l

C, 4

<L(

yv;enes

10,000

f

<1.4

<1.4 I <3.5

<7.0

<2,.5

<Le

< . `_

---

145,101200 ,

THUM

Tabie 3 - , f"\Co `i ier .1 st) :i and Gi

,ounLiwat,_i, Claanup Obje,-,iivz~-s

I:tl 11route,

Soil Cleanup

Objectives

(uc1JKq)

cla--": II

CleanupObjuciz .c

aq

L

ILL

47,000

39

1,000,000

800,000

21,500,000

10500

4,900,000

11400

7,000,000

4 ,050

3500

stoo

7,5

Eenzo(b)fluoramenc

8,000

0.9- . .-

B.11Z 0 (k) 8 -10 ra n chc 11

20,000

0 .8s

Benzo(k)pntnt

800

Dibcn7.u(a,h)arthmcc,1c

800

IAdcnu(I .2,3-c

.d)pyteod

2 .

2TEX Corn po"Is

100

25

Tolue.11P

12,500

2,500

Ellybunwo

7,000

1,000

Xvients

74,000

i0,000

---

T ;1Us , Ihn

.7,

n Ydbuo, Pelunnanc . - AanN4cal aod PLO v,nuW

L .

I .

,g'L; IIIJIICII,- . ,, 1;rv1

I

I

NS

NS

+

US

Ll

L!

Tom .,

Cd,ylL,w

'Lu

I

ills

NS

NS

lqs

Ns

NS

I

<LU

:I . I

<) .J

NS

N S

N'

NS

r15

1145

,,O

'11 .1

<3 .3

<1 .0

<I

.1

<31 . ;

0AW

id,

b .,

WOO wqfwm ~

73

NS

Ill's

3,7

NS

NS

10 .01

-U

St

NS

40 .625

NS

NS

NS

.40

.112

<0 .135

NS

NS

NS

NS

<0 .034

U .041

<0

2

0 L ", j

L.]

: L`52

S

N S

< 1 .9a

lqs

N5

c U,6

<0,049~NNS

NS

<0,096

114S

r1l s

<0.029

~0 'bo6

JAJ .

<0

.0J3

KS

N S

<0026

NS

NS

<0 .0U9

c,0')6

.40

.02 .f

NS

IN S

N .5

<0 .201

NS

NS

4O .U . ;l

.

.Q

(1, 1 flvwm1"I

<0.033

<0,095'

U .()66

N S

ll;j

NS

NS

N$

.0.-)05

<0 .079

<0,224

0

.15

Ns

mN

NS

i, !,

IIJL

NS

'O.02

lu.00I

1

W .U85

<u O]

4U,U79

40124

._0 .010

up

Munud"ne

QW ."

<00D

0 9

I

NS

NS

NS

N5

NS

A

<0,071

5

I .5

1145

N5

NS

145

N,

ItS

<0023

<11,1111

40 .0? 1

G~U,6

<0.07u

0

1 .2 .1

<0 .033

L l1

<0,i93

l

IJ . I ,hJrAcnc

NS

NS

NS

NS

;0 .152

<c 1?5

NS

NS

A

NS

<0,032

<D .15 2_

125

st

5

NS

NS

<O .)06

NS

NS

<0 .032

'0 .104

I'4,

<0,066

NS

INS

<0 .033

N

NS

<U

.01

0210

L . :!5u

0 .4

0 .6

0 . .'1

0 .3

0 .,

1

1 .150

.. .0-2

N .S

Ld

7 .8

1 .3

1

I .S

9, .It)U

0 .11

Ti-l""

3,0

AN

1.1

0.44

10.&5

"L U

n,

T&

on

t3l

61

87 .1

125

U2

is

L

~ :L

!:;:68; .,

Cu"U .

I~2

I

, •,•

RIMAON chh.6m, VaIll („N)

] .-

, 5

F.-;6

4-0.6

43K2

-11 -I -

-mna

---

1'

1-

J .1 1' A .I

Y .-d :L :

r1 :Ieaiali,Iu Pc:inrnlahcu -,'1nSIyEir.31

:;ud 1=ialci

Re.".wi_

: (Con' I)

yL i•d111pum Lv IOn

U

I

1I

LI1Uh7

7?, Th7

017,197 i N4Q97

,L1t9IJ7

,3Nh'1 I

tli'Ja

1

.0

'c1

.0

102

,YI7A',

L L

I . .':

Yrdu-„~

EJn^bncr,,,

:

XVI,:11-

NS

NS

NS

NS

I'i5

NS

NS

NS

9

7S

23

I

NS

NS

NS

NS

I

IJS

NS

j

NS

I

NS

Pulw'dlc 4rom: :ic Mydccs,bo :

(up9.1

I-rc ;LI ykI

,hdr.Je1 :-

}ML,vl N,pIW,-Acne

,KCU :phJ,ut<

„« . .phJylcue

.uWnn .nv

Vus,o( I ) ;e,d,IZC .Ic

Ocnroi-. ;y,,c:k".

U'r&I 11L

lu

0<ne .(~h!p..ykn<

Ocntcl,.tna

. :r .umr:n, :

Chryac

D,brn

.old

.1 •+ Itdu

:,ru+~

Pluu

;onJ

.nm

I`fh,Jn .o(I

.1 3 .cd)py ; c

„

c

N

.IpIuh Ir c

Phcna,U'.,, .I .<

Ptrerv :

10

27

<1'S

<1 .2

<0.15

I

<0,05

<0.05

<0 .05

<0. 15

I

10.05

<0I

<0 .05

x0 .15

3

<0 .U5

10

7 .9

<O,I

I ~

NS

NS

NS

N5

NS

NS

NS

NS

N$

NS

NS

NS

NS

IJS

NS

NS

NS

NS

N5

NS

I"S

NS

NS

1145

ills

NS

N5

Is

Ns

NS

FJS

N5

NS

NS

Ivy

NS

<0 .04

<0.034

<0.041

<0 .6

=0 .029

:0.008

<0,061

<0.062

0

<0 .U71

0 .64

'0

.0 .3

1 .3

<0 .071

.0 .0 .16

<0 .038

<0 .032

0 .72

NS

NS

NS

NS

N5

NS

NS

N5

IJ5

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

N5

I

NIS

NS

N'S

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

I

NS

NS

I'S

NIS

r:S

NS

NS

NS

i"S

<U .1

.2

<.0 .! 12

0 .`r-

<( .90

<0C96

<0 .026

<0,201

0 :1c

: OOo-,9

<U .23-i

<0,0(0

:u.()%6

.0 . 132

.123 .1

<U.I]2

<0 .(15

<0.(06

0.5

6 .7

<i),034

Y .3

<0 .6

U .YU

0 .11

:

0 .061

<0,0c

<U .U/1

<U,00 :i

--0

.0'

;

1 .4

<U .UaO

: :) .0:18

: 0 .032

U . .': :

l,

us

4U%

VPi'I CawRnc

0.6

0.9

0.9

1 .2

0.6

19.0

1 .7

NS

III; I s P„d Oil

3.8

3.7

4.2

5

1 63

7.9

----

Dluolv,tCvygcu-W_+cr(u+PlL)

I

1 .1

G .4

2 .1

1

.03

0 .23

10 .

3 ;51

N'

r

0a, "8n, - 5u,1 Gae (S.,J

I

Ia

I

4

4 .

NS

19

_ .

Gc6o,

. Ulu. : ;;le • N'

:cce (myt)

88

69 .7

26 .1

d7 .1

96 .4

I 62

.7

59,9

I

NS

c'

rbou Uio4de'

-'- .ii

L,as (%)

03

I

a,5

a

i

MS

RrducJuu0:9J :.JouPoreati :dW,V)

I

.160

-95

I

-175

-139.2-

I 99.0

K~--I---

---

I e/ 2006 16 :23

630E;752479

ATTACHMENT S

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORTS

PAGE 26 i4 et','

---

;~i.. rlrQI-,2l+r~~

P.O . hCX

lts, 1120 N . iI QMi TREE

NEVv ULM, Mil 56073-014F9

MWE(50)3500617 'W'~ .iS130017N7 •±

EST 1'n} :t507i's`'

. :1-

;t

:'u

AL

::

Reporting Limits

BYEX/GRO Sample pH

( 2

All data for this report has been approved by MVTL Laboratory IIan~gcn,anr

. .

iiV7LN y+e~-lS

.-a+u- ..=:el .'+. :rJ>

.L .L..:u1L: . :uttL

. u6dn.dt.- u%:dn

.(t

~ eN p~r>.LmeiiYTLIUYwW:yt-+ll-tcl_a,-+1l

dl,l

. .t y : l

d 1- .. i .. .aGU._ z(<du .W

:

:_

:.da .:.4u .. . .+.-~1u+rye.uv~rvtl.yWff_Atumuludp,

.t.<il

.nm .llsv,tLyeSlIca .:A .:,...l, .y .ll uL~L

.1 u

6e . •

1

• . .

i'v_

r[Lrii'IBQGA1 O. I Cl?i'1'llrll!'Y31 i'.Z

Yl'_=

Report Data :

4 Sup 1`iS'%i

DARYL BECK

RETEC

4'13 UACOUTA ST STE 400

ST PAUL V' S51u1

Lab Number : 93-L1£i3Z9

Work Order ii : 22-437

Account iP

: 01,91S9

Data Received

: 31 Jai 1595

Date Sample& 30 Jul 1993

Temperature

at Receipc

: 9 .0 C

Project Awe

: ONSF EOL.A, IL

EPA SU-346 Hei.hod

3020/5030 MODIFIED

Project Number : 3-1903--400

PVOC Analysis Date :

l: nag 152.J

PVOC Dilution Factor

: 1

Sampla Description

: MW-S

ANALY'iE

Ler~en_

Result Units

( 1.S

ppb

F L

1 . 1

Anu)ynt

KE

Toluene

( 1 .0

ppb

1 .0

Ethyl aonzaoa

( 1 .1

p21

1 .1

KL

Xyienes (total)

( 3 .5

ppb

6 .5

K~

AAA-TFT (,SURROr5A1"E) RECOVERY :

96

---

P .0 ' 60X 2.iS,

1126 PJ . Fi;CrJ1' STREET

NE . ,, hLivi, M14 Sti073-0219

PHi1NE (30,' ; .C ;-0717 WA1 S (UUid 782-7_`•! (

HK 1501) S:J-_' 1 u

Vd

Report

Date :

I zap 190d

RL

adjusted due

to sample matrix

RL = Reporting Limits

;

All data K1 this

report hat been approved

by

Wit

. Laboratory 6ianagei,rrrrt_

WP/,llr,w-s-rw.-uc4-~-J`

L .

hL c_+,lac

: "dw 1,L-y- IL "1X iLb&ad -a4,L .lk-WId-L . -.y-,d

:..

,L.4

Lab Number

: 98-L1631_9

Work Brier 14 : 22- n37

ORRYL BECK

Accounc & 01S15J

RET6C

4'1.3 WACOUT .1 ST STE +100

ST PAUL HN 55101

Date Received : 31 Jul 1990

Date Sarnpled : 30 Jul 1998

Temperature at Receipt : 9-0 C

Project Name : UNSF COLA, IL

Project Number : 3-1900-noO

EPA SW-846 Ilathod 0310 :

Nuthod Detection Limits

Date Lxtraccc-d : 6 pug 1993

determined accurdinq to 4OCFR, Appendix (3,

Date Analyz cI : 2 sop 1990

Part 136, 1992 .

Dilution Factor

: 3

Sample Deccription

: NU-5

POLYNUCLEAR K:OHAY'IC

HYDROCARBONS

Rccult Units HL

.-Methyl Naphthalene

<

0

.132 ug/L

0.132

2-Methyi naphthaiane

<

0 .112 uc/L 0 .112

Hcenaphtaiene

(

0

.135 ugh .

0.1-36

.Acenaprthylene

( 1 .900 ug/L 1 .900

Anthracana

( 0 .095 ug/( .

0.0_1u

Benzo(a)anthracene

<

0

.026 ug/L 0,026

Ocnzo(a)pyrene

(

0

.201 ug/L

0 .20'

Benzo('o)Quuranthuna

(

0 .205

ug/L

0.205

Senzo(ghi)perylene

(

0

.079 ug/L

0 .079

6onzo(k)fluornnthrene

<

0 .234 ug/L

0 .234

Chryscne

( 0 .016 ug/L U,016

Oibenzo(nh)unthrlicene

( 0 .076

ug/L'

0.076

Fluoranthene

0 .020 ug/L 0_132

Fluorene

0

.310 ug/L 0

.234

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

< 0 .162 ug/L' 0.10

Naphthalene

( U-126 ug/L 0.125

Phenanthrene

(

0.106

ug/L 0.106

Pyrene

0 .260 ug/L 0 .033

p-TERPHENYL (SURROGATE) RECOVERY

: 107

---

J51NDuL vJL''

P .O . rC)> 2 :5, '1126 h . liOtdf Sfr,Le:1'

M-VV ULJi, 1viN Sdu734U249

PI kONL ('j0'/1 35--HS I1 WAYS (onu) 762-356;7

had (507) 355-_C~.~u

RL

Reporting L .iniits

BTEX/GRO Sample pH < 2

All

data for cl-lis

report has been

approved by I'IVTL Laboratory Hanagamsnc .

&Iwd~ Ylcwlp-.Wbl's'77~lrLbyu

..:".uulWtuv~., . .vli6LJl.Sw41-~"-"V'i"'~~

. .__,_ .._,-._n :__ ._ .e u.uu.4vludlu l.r

.wut,.lI'"- u .iL .L L .L -1 1 ._p- :~ .n .ul.-L:.

. .e . : e :

lhs'% 1JcJ? a1~J EQtI. i~!

. O1'1'ui21 tl '1'±'Y 1 :

ii'

1_- ~' , ).

RepOrt

UUCI; .

.,ep 1t ;Ji7

Lab Humber : 98-018330

Llerk Order ;F : 22-997

DARYL BECK

Flccounc 6 : 0197.59

PtETLC

413 LJRCOUTA ST SIE 400

ST PAUL MN 65201

Data Received : 31 Jul 1990

Date Sarnplod

: 30 Jul 1998

Teinperatura ac Receipt : 9 .0 C

Project NJ .nme : BWSF EOLA, YL

Pruject Numbar : 3-1908-400

EPA SW-8 ,

16 Method 8020/5030 i4O0If-7ED

PVOG r4rlaly :.i, 0_tc :

5

PVOC Dilution FAczcr :

Sample Oe cription

: YRIP BLANK

ANALYTE

Units Ill .

Analyse

Result

Benzene

( 7.-'L ppb

1-1

F.L

Toluene

( 1

.0 ppb

1 .0

KI'.

Ethyl Benzene

( 1.1 ppb

1 .1

KE

XyLsnes (Total)

( 3 .S ppb

3 .5

Kc

AAA-YFT (SURROGATE) RECOVERY

:

90 %

---

MBQ=UATURIEE,

1126 North Front Street

Nsvr U(rn MN 56073

t F MICC{ krrarn e'urber

i

Phone. (E07) ZU-8617

is (EGG) 7E2-7551

Ear

. : (507

1

?59 .12.11

I

~J rCl

F

~G 1

J--

c

c* APLEASE

. [N.

[IQ

car

NOT WRITE

BUS

IN

i

THE

ODYf

SH/DED AREASEC

ORD

Tort

to Dart,( (r( C I

:

invcce to

: RCT 4C

dress:

:ZC7 C r

1 tlCO

Address

: f~ Llnco ~e.51:

;'s fLC

c 4D

s%fee,51e

.

.foal,/)A"

CS7o -lr,~

PecE

'_o(

bRI: ORDER #

t t C'GG

H:mccf 4cmpI,C

11

O's c

Pepresrntlr. ,,`. .

Lc.FQ

. ;~

Use

,,

Vri~V

I

Lb'icvrSemcie.crtw,,,tar

Scmpis

neadpt{nn

4

Getc5ims

~

Soil VlescckFevdlVr

;c!scm.

;ir{ldctrh,e~SvbctenGiSar{Plscsr9e5prcJiG:cl

I

~

;=~:c

. ;'1'~E,'`

:~.(CX3CFi(ilE

.

.t<nkEOncT

r

E%%OHM

I

I

,

t ScmIiciCr,fonr;(rcL~C-lc'C[fe(:udg^ . . I

`1 `n: -.

rfp

reh

c-

.r,r.r

.

I

pin U"

J

r t

,

~

J IJ

i

I

Ij

~

I

1I

1{

I

II

CCr, .mvrl5 : .

I

"Lit.

I

rZnL(E!IEG.CP

:

Ccn^.ante

~

~

~

L.cveiYeC v}'

:

{_emr :c~Ccnc`iicr.l

i

(8z^pL Ccn.: :'a'-:~

1i

1I

---

jJi, iTL1I~I .- P:

o . L3o

;; Das, lees

L

•. ,

i-DONf rll~sr

N11 W UL'a .

VaN 530734i2?9

~On (SG7/ 3S4u517 WAYS (900) 7523bS! F .Ci (5011 T -,5

1:aso

RercrL We :

3 nu 1023

hL = Reporting Liiuit

.

BTEX Sample pH < 2

l1

data for this r-ooct bu4 been approved by MVTL Lauorntori' Masni

.g-neut. .

Lab PJumbc r

: S0-L1654 L

Work OCCL_ 1

: 21-275

1TUD UUNNI C

Accuv,nt ; : U19159

1 ET'EC

' 13 W0UiA ST Sit ,

;00

ST 'PAUL KIN 55101

Date aeLeived : 17 Jul 1051:

Date Sampled : 15 Jul

;1998

Temperature ut Receipt

: ON 1Cf

Project Ncrie! l3NSF COLA,IL

Project Number : 3--1903-400

F24 SQ-946 method 9020/5030 RODtFIED

PVOC Analysis Me! 22 Jul 1JJS

PVOC'Uilution Fs.c:tor : i

sample

Description : MW-21

ANALYT E

Units RL

A1t .ly C

Result

Benzene

<

1 .1

ppb

1 .1

(CL

%oluene

<

1 .0

ppb

1 .0

RE

Ethyl Cenze :2e

<

L .1

poh

1 .1

1B

Eylenes (Total)

< 3 .5 ppb

a' s

P.E

A .i-TFT (SURROGATE) RECOVERY!

93 .,

---

W •i

i r

.

F .O . LOX : .49, 1126 h1

. FRONT SIRE 1

NOW &A, MN 6u?.3-62 :9

1'FiUi!1

. 1-u7) L6~-3t3 7 W'KIS (BOU} 7003501 'rp ( (bull

SEA-01A

J t_

: 1LhI i .t1YIAL Uf S'Olfl'UnrlT_'1- !i'Y pl' ZZ

Report Vale : 3 Aug 1.99&

UL = Reporting Limits

11 data, for this: rehurt has

been approved by hVTL Laboratory

Lab Nuwbar

: 98-L1GUII

Work Order

21- :-75

i1JJD RONPIING

ACL;OUr:C

D19159

%13 AACOCTA 5T Sill 0)

r,T VAUL AN 55101

Date Rece1Yed

: 17 (Iul 1093

Date Sampled : 15 Jul 1594

temperature at Receipt : 0L ICE

tcui2cc Name : $NSF EOLA,IL

Project Number : 3-1902-q00

EPO- SO--846 Method t131U

: 1iethod Detection Limits

Date h:(tractod : 22 Jul 1998

determined nccordi g co 'OCFR, Appendix 8,

Date Analyzed : 30 Awl 1998

Cart 116, 1'3`32-

Dilution Factor : 3

5ump1e 17 scription : RI'l-21

pCi1 .YNUCIEkR P120Fi&T .IC HYU20CAR1l0NS

Result units

1t1,

t--riethyl Na.phthalen,-

C

0,132 ug/L

0 .132

2-Methyl haphthalenu

C 0 .112 ug/L

0

.1 .1 .'2

Lceuaphthcne

< 0 .135 ug/L

0-135

::ccye&pl'al?$%lt'.i7e •

< 1 .9210 u ;;/L

1 .950

mathracjue

C OX96 uS/L

0 .096

?>et : n(v)anth_ac :=uz

C 0

.026 ui;/L

0 .036

}enZO(s)Eyrenc

C 0 .201 ug/L

0 .201

3e :u:o(l

:)fluor nthe :,

< 0 .205 ul/L

0 .205

lenro(Ehi)perylene

< 0 .079 u9/L

0 .079

Benzo(k)YLuornnthrene

< 0 .234 ug/t

0 .23 ;

Chrysene

< 0 .016 ug/L

0 .016

Uihenzn(~h)r ntYU : a; : :e

C 0

.076 ug/L

0 .076

Lluorarrthene

< 0 .132 ug/L

0

.132

F uorene

< 0.23& u_;/L

0 .2111

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

C U

.Iu2 ug/L

0 .152

riayhtha.lene

< 0 .125 ug/I :

U-125

Phenanthreno

< 0 .106 ug/L

0 .106

Pyrene

0 .190

ug/L

0-053

p-TEItPI1ENYL (SURROGATE) IECOVE2Y

: 72 X

x RL adjusted due to sample matrix

---

G ;lu~ ~ . .!C7'I

r .t . . GOX 2+f9,

'1 126

b! . ri

ON

Y S FREET

I\CY

rI-itJlvc

.' ULhA,

Ib07}

h'MN

3b4-8~1

Sa073-u249%

VJIiYS (000( 7u2 .3 :

.51

RepUiti DeC.c

:

11D_

1'J'Jci

Lab Nuwber : 93-1.!UO42

{fork

Order

,° :

rEDD ;:p1J1It G

,'lcc:ouni

: „ :

0191.5 Y

RETLc;

413 u1,C(UTA ST STE '00

ST 1 :.JL Mtl 55101

k2L = Reporting Lilaits

NTEX 8aulple pa

t 2

111

d' Ca i'o.- this

report has been approved by Mi.'L

tabot'atory t'Iunt,C+ewen*c-

Dlf'fL ; _: ..[u ti:

"~V[+ :grt

u~mW>'+- u-

.~ t4lh :4W01.ouLY1141t

sjI[leaulD.ayluLrLf4'I1u ;,,u.r-r .[rW :L,~[f-Jac: :-L+-I~,_,_.[Lvl .: .:.-DL NL

Date Received : 17 Jul 1S98

Date Sawnled : 15 Jul 1598

'tzmpei-ature lit Receipt

: OU ICE

P roject tJ4u,e : 814SF EOLA,IL

Project Numbar : 3--1SOB-400

EPA SU- ;?a6 Method 8020/5030 MODIFIED

PVOC Anulysis Dat :, : 22 Jut 1933

VVOC Dilution Factor

: L

Sample D scription : W/-

;;2

ANALYTE

Rosult

< 1.1

Units

ppb

Rt

1 .1

Arlu

.

ljst

KE

toluene

1.1

ppb

1.0

KE

Ethyl )6c'aze„c

< 1

.1

ppb

1 •i

KL

Xy'r_ne`> (Total_)

<

3 .5 ppb

3 .G

ICE

AAA- Y .r (SURROGATE) 2ECOVEaY : 103 Y

---

* 1 : iJ'aLL :6' 1 L `_,

,

t i

J

i

„

F .O . GU) : 2.3,

.

.1_G N . PhoN i 5if1iC 1

114013= NON 364 YiT bVnfs Nab i )o2-3S?,i F;= :

(EO't} - :

ctiu

L' .E,tRi _i1JJ 1f:L .

.ti''tJ=t9 ' Zr/~Yi'

.lY

3y'.117' .LU :i1:'I .

Rouurt Data :

;ul' 10%

LaL Nulubec : 98-L1Gb4 :'

Work Order ,`, • 21-275

i'LiD RONd'1N C,i

Accuuut

c :

019159

RL1'EL

413 \ACOU9•r. ST HE

loo

ST PAUL MN 557 .01

Date Received : 17 Jul 1208

tate Sampled : 15 Jul 1158

Tewperatu're at aeceipt : UK ICE

Vrcject 1 . :ywe : OWSC LOLa,IL

Projact Number : 3-1905-400

sample matrix interterc,1

with U .V . detection

but not Fluorescence detection .

Quantified using

fluorescence detector only

.

RL =

Reporting LiwiLa

11

dr.t for this report

ho been

approved

by MV9'L Laboratory

uert't-

ul~T.y~

:c

..su,:..,:

.,rtiy

../3_ ::e .>1fJ:.!~:-

:, .

.ILt~t~

.:1+.Ju,.+C

UL

LVII

(16- ,o.,

lid L, 6--

. . . .-u _ , .. _ : 0

. .- 1

.JuJ~ . . ;L{tiCulwn/ILIOYIt

•~ Y'(_tiGYY1nLtIlAi-iJpLWY,IwuW~LLY11t~lYy„- : ._}.yJlt_y

. . .f .J . . .4-~li4i

. tltrv .

.}1 •,1:_116-S

:itY

"EPA S4--8'iG Method 8310

: Method Detection Limits

determined Occording to 40CFA, Appendix B,

Part 136, 1991

.

Date Extracted ; 22 Jul 1098

bate

ta_lyzed

: 30 Jul 1098

Dilution hactoc : 1

Sawpla ?Jcsciihtiout hi11-22

IcLYN'UCLLAR A_ROtnA'1'IC I1YJfOC'UDONS

Result Units R .

1-•Mcthyl Naphthalene

< 0

.040 ut,/L 0-040

2-t1ethyl Naphthalene

C

0 .034 ny/L U .0311

AawnoplrLhe,tr.

1 .150

ug/L 0 .041

ncena_rhchy!ene

C 0 .600 ug/L O . GOD

Anthrace::cj

< 0 .029 ug/L 0

.025

tenio(tz)vr,'l

- rrc pe

0 .150

ug/L 0 .uu8

henzo(r~)pyrc:'Y:e

< 0 .061 ug/L

0 .061

Senso(b)i-luoranthene

< 0

.06 ug/L 0 .062

Benzo(ghi)perylene

C 0

.024 ug/L 0 .024

IIenzo(k)iluorauthrene

< 0

.071 ug/L 0 .071

Chry_-ene

0 .190

ug/L 0 .005

Oibenzo(ult)anthrac :na

C

0 .023 ug/L 0 .023

rluoranthene

0 .700

ty/L

0 .02,0

E'luorene

0 .570

ug/L 11,071

Iudeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

C 0

.046 ug/L 0_016

Naphthalene

< 0 .038 ug/L 0 .0313

Phenanthrene

< 0

.032 ug/L

0 :032

Pyrene

0

.400

ug/L 0 .010

p-TERPUE:`CYL (SURROGATE)

RECOVERY :

126 %

---

-.9, v12G P1 . FRONT GlfkErT

PHOM

ttQ7)

35A. us

0

(BOO) 182-3 57 FAX (s0f)

~Itll

VICE 02 V?

toil',

%Qrt Date : 3 Aug 190i

RL = Reporting Limits

STEX Sample p11 < 2

11 dnta for this report has been approved by UV% Laboratory Fianurrement

.

= UJ04

.

ILL

t,

rEDO RUNNING

RETEC

M WACOUTA ST STE 100

&T PAUL

hN

55101

Lab Kwhar

: 98-LIG643

Work Oiler V 21-275

Account

It

019159

Date

Received

: 17 J&

1993

Date Sampled

: 15 Jul 1908

Temperature at Receipt : ON ICE

Noject game : 1MSF IOLA,IL

Project huwber

; 3-19OB-400

EPA So-LIE method 6020/5030 MODIFIED

PVOC Analysis Date! 22

Jul 1V)3

PVOC Dilution Factor : I

Sample Description : 0-23

ANALYT

Benzene

Result

< 1.1

Units

Q

I .i

Analyst

ELI

Toluw"e

< 1.0

ppb 1.0

ELI

Ethyl Deazeue

< 1.1 ppb

1.1

Kr

wylenes (Total)

C 3.5

ppb

3 .5

ICE

AIA-M (SURROGATE) aEC0V1

..RY :

100

---

r'.0- UOA _L9, 112a

f ,1 . Fr+ON i STiUiL I

----.~-__-

N6W ULw wild Wu'13-U'1u9

PitorElSJt)

:s ;-U I VJAT (60617A?-'s 57 FAX

4 ,

,JU1) 3 `

.

A1

r! :;a: ; I'1'GIYl't71Jil'1'7,b11=a ;wi

Rapport Date :

3

Rill; lli9R

Lab NujUZr : 0D-LiG3 3

Woek Orduc

2!'--'7 : ;

1'f DD ItCJNN1c46

Acrouut

;:

: 019 .15'4

7ti:TtiC

413 WACOUTA ST 6'ii. 400

ST PAUL bWN 55101.

Date Received : 17 Jut 10"8

Date Samplad : 15 Jul 1998

't'empernture ut 1Lccaipt : ON 1C1 :

1•i;oject Nauic : BRSI~ E0LA,iL

Project Nuulber : 3-190$-•x

:00

CPA SW-9't Method 0310

: k tl,od Detection LiIbit~- Date Extract;--d

: 2 : Jul 1J9_'

detc:rtuiued according to 400R, Appendix L,

Da't.e

31) Jul ?

.994

L'arc 136, 1992 .

Dilution Fact

:n' : I

SaNtp1.L 1Jcsct-ipi:iot: :

MV-23

C-OLYNUCI rAll aROAATIC HYDROCARBONS

Resuli. Units

Pt.

1-Atcc.h~l Napitihalzne -

C 0 .0 :U u~'/L

0,040

2-F•i

ctllyl

Naptitltal zrte

< U

. 034 ug/L

0 .034

,acei apLithene

L.250 oWL 0 .041

I1C,c-itN.[?krehy1etie

C 0 .600 ug/L

0 .€00

An thracetsu

< 0 .D29 ug/L 0 .029

13enzo ( :--) Lnthract.ne

0 .660 ug/ 1,

0 .003

Be iiLO(a)pyV1ue

< 0 .061 a /L 0 .061

3enzo(I))fluorantl :c:rte

C

U .062 ug/L

0 .06 :'

kn o(ghi1P x-

let-

< 0.024 ug/L 0-024

Bengo(lc)fluorauthrene

< 0 .071 ug/L 0,071

Chryszue

0.130 ub/L 0.005

Pibet ._ :o(ah)antbre.cene

<

0 .023 ug/L 11 .023

Fluor . .nthenc

< 0 .040 ug/L

0 .040

l Yuot't-ne

1.120 uu

; L 0.071

lttdeno(1,2,3'-rd)pyrenu

< 0 .046 ug/L

0 .046

Naphthalene

C 0

.038 ut,/L 0,038

Phenauthrene

C 0 .032 ug ;L

0 .039

pyrenu

0

.440 ti.,/L

0 .01.0

p-T)rttP11CNYL (SUR11Ui3A'TG) RECOVERY : 116-v,

Sample matrix

interEet-cd with

U .V

. detection but not Fiuorrsceucr

Quantified usiitg tlaot-escence detector

only .

RL = ReportinggI Limits

t11 data for this report

has 1rcan, appron'ed by MVTL Laboratory Din

g-:u nt .

detection .

----------

---

? .L) . LOX 245, 11 :L6 N1 . f-ilUN'I STin El

NEW U LM . M W 5,3073-024)

I'NUI;L

( :.u7)

11 WA1S (8GU) 7U2 100 i7 . (5011 A& A N

IVIE .SL m 2111

<O

(Li1

Uoyocc We : J , ui' 19J8

Lab Nuwbe,r : 9E-L.1obol4

¶Toll: Order

21-20

'1•LDU RONNLNG

nccouni: il : 019159

RGrEC

R13 V111000TA ST S'TE ¢U0

ST PAUL IiN 551u1

Date Received : 17 Jill 1'998

F2L = Reporting Limits

BTEX Sample pH < z

Xl]1 data for this report has been approved by NVTL Labaratucy hiwt :ageuant

.

Date Sampled : 15 Jul 1998

Temperature at Recc:ipt : DN

NE'

Project Name : ISNS'P EDLA,'U

.

Project Number : 3-105-40

EPA SW-b4G Method 8020/5030 MODIFIED

PVOC Analysis

We : 13 Jul INS

'VOC Dilution 1 ..ctar : I

Sample Description

: M3I-2'

Units

ppb

I2L

1

.I

Analyst

RE

AMALYTE

Result

benzene

< 1 .1

Toluene

< 1 .0 ppb

1 .0

RE

Ethyl . Hetizene

< 1,1

ppb

t .1

KL

Xylenes (Toil)

<

3.5

pph

3

.5

TCL

WONT (5Ut1ROGA'T'E) WOVEN :

101 ''.

---

1'.flL .u::_c Wau,eur .: .'I.ttL

nalJv3, s3a~

VU

.

.10 ; z : :1 . „_G N .

r tOn- ,1 RELY

:4i VV 1JLMM,

earl CGU73-a24S

VtIUIV :-.

CLJJI)

"Ja-115'+) Av,;tS

Id00) 7L'

• • = :~ :;7 1-iL~ 1 -0l) JL.J-__

. .`iU

01.102,0J

Report Me

: 3

.;uj 1

0

H

Lab dumber

:

98-L1GGd4

Work Order

v

: 21-20i

TM WN1_e)G

Account

4

: 019159

tt T1iC

413 LaCOUTA

Si

STE OD

ST PAUL

Did 5501

UL = Reporting Limits

All data for tlciss report

has been approved by MVTL Luborattey k&"aguwent

.

Date Receio-ed

: 17 Jul 1992

Date Sawp.lad

: 15 Jul 1998

Tewperature at Receipt

: ON 1C?'

Project dawn : BONY 00,11,

EPA SW-846 Mathod 2310 : MQLhod Detection Limit_,

Project Number : 3-1906-400

Late L:<tractod : 22 J 1 1998

determined according Lo 40CVk, Appendix $,

Late Anal.yzrd : 30 Ju1

190

Part 136, 1992 .

Dilutica racf.cr : 1

Sample 1)aecr-iptinn : kU-21..

FOLYNUCL AL,' A 19risTIC I1YJ1;OCd LO,'S

le.ult Units

=777" -207~

RL

1-Methyl Ydsphuealcue

< 0

.040 ug/L

0 .0' O

2-Methyl . Wsphthalene

< 0 .034 ug/L U .034

Acenaphtheuc

< 0 .041 ug/L 0 .011

Ace,tsphthyle : :e

< 0 .600 ug/L

0 .600

Aathracene

< 0 .029 ug/L 0 .029

Benao(a)anthracYc,

IIenzo(a)pyrene

< 0 .OOR ug/L

< 0 .061 ug/L

U .UO$

0 .051

Benzo(b)11'uorantheuc

< 0 .002 ug/L 0 .0M

U?ru.o(ghi)p rylen .

< 0 .024 u ;!/L U .0Z4

Benza(k)=luoranthrana

< 0 .071 ug/L 0 .07l

Chrysene

< 0.005 ug/L 0.005

Dibenco(sh)nuciYra.cune

< 0 .023 ug/L

0

.023

Fiuar+_rcthenr•

< 0 .040 ug/L .0 .040

F'luorena

< U.071

ug/L

0 .0'71

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pgreae

< 0 .04d ug/L 0

.346

Nuphthal:are

< 0 .018 Ug/L 3 .038

Fhenaathreue

< 0 .032 ug/L

11

.032

Yyrene

0 .020

"g/1.

0 .010

p-•T

Ll2PRENYh (SU ROCATI) RECOVERY

: 77 Y

---

TKDD KUNNIAC

413 OACOUTA

ST

STE 400

11 PAUL UN 55101

Project

Name : CNBF LOLA,IL

IIA

SW-06 Meth & 13020/5030

;WOOIF1EI)

SauiL .e U sccipri

.on : MH-9

ANAL 'rF

L<:Illr?TIC

l li y.l

thyl Benzene

lylel,r-.s ('iotal)

kAA-TFT t5URROCriTE) FECCVL12Y

:

103 Y

J -u

"

S

Jc11+011',I

;

:CS

I

Iv ru . LOX

1'126 N . 1 ON1 STREET

NcAJ ULK", MN 560

-13-0219

Iteho'rt Date :

I Au, 10'08

Lab Nuhther : 08 - L1CL45

Work Order

: W'G7,

Account 3

: 01915 ;

Date Ecceivod

: 17 Jul 1993

Date Sampled

: 15 Jul 1998

'feuperature at Receipt : ON ICE

Project Number : 3-1908-100

IlL = 1leportipg Limit .

DT IX Sauple pH < 2

.11 Ws fo this report h

: been

.approved by HVTL Laboratory WanngeLUL .

PWOrJF

:WA-Q10001355807

_w~.YCIID . :nW)+: •; u .

.utLupl~~~7~s+tt-11'WL

:

.NYy.IILLLPD_tb4

klYY1%,WJ .'Ye ik"41-1t1~1tui~(Jr3At .tya`~1-r .L. .~~WL.1Lt_

:

.

-

PVOC A)talysis Date : 23 Jul 195B

HOC Dilution Factor : I

ka n31t Units RI

Analyse

< 1A

vvb

1 .1

< 1 .0 pgb

1

.0

KR

< 1 .1

ppb

1 .1

KI:

c 3 .5 ppb

:3 .5

KF.

---

u

r .U . ii0) 1 :J 1r: . fROrf

IitLiT

tdl;w

l)ULI, MN 56671-0743

I'HOnL c

:

;0713oa-u511 v\liCS MUM 782-3557 iu

(5U0) 30S-2uSu

a :L .(:1

.O ova:~rrr~~rf's.:11Y.<

; js,c

Ue rL Uut3 . .i ang 1903

Lab Number

: 58-LiUtk

Work Order it : 21-2'15

1tDD RupliVltC,

Account

4{ :,

0191.59

HON

,13 i) ::GOU'fA ST S1'E cOU

NT PAUL Bill 56101

Date

Received:

17 Jul 1398

Date Sampled : 15 Jul 1900

Temperature at Gecaiptt ON ICE

Project

Naaa : HNOV GOLA,IL

Project Number :

3-1908-100

1'PA 5N- •8 4G 1et'hod 8310

: hic--thod Detection Limits

Date Extracted

: 22 Jul 199f.1

det :

:ruined according to cOCYR, Appandi

:

; _9,

Date Analyzed :

30 Jul 1538

Pi.rt

126, 1992 .

Dilution Factor : 1

Sample De:rc

;iption : Mw-9

PoLYin1CLEAit AROMATIC 1lYDt0GARfONS

i-400j! Plaph:chalcne

2--raOel

:y1 NnphthrJuiu

Acc :: ..ohtheua

Aclet

.<-phthylene

A!rchruceEie

Deuzn(a)

uthracexle

I i:zo(a)pyrene

8ewo(b)_luoi'! .xthena

Gen o(ghi)pery1eue

1Jen all:JIluOC'axithr

:3172

Chrysene

Oibeuto(ah)snthrrce,ie

luorsrdtherle

F1uGrcYt~

lndeuo(1,2,3 cd}j,yiene

Lduptitht lene

Ph~npy

.r we:ulthrane

p--TL'RPRCNYL (SURtZOGATE) RECOVilY

:

7S k%

RL = Reporting Limits

11

dabs for this report L:rs

been approved by 1

•Y

VTL Labor>xtory lth nag eat .

d uh

.: : ::y:. :u4

:3u+slrt_ :mrcIt k. %C

bI Lc L4

e .: :w .-it :. .I: . .i1.Bit,U-

d'^~- :

Result Units

12L

< 0 .040 .ug/L 0 .000

<

0 .034 ug/L

0 .034

< 0 .041 ug/L

0 .041

< 0 .600 utg/L

0

.GU0

<

0 .029 ug/L 0 .029

<

0

.008 ucg/L

0-008

<

U .061 ug/L 0 .061

< 0 .0G2 ug/L

0 .0611'•

<

0.024 ug/L

0 .024

< 0 .071 ug/L 0 .071

C 0 .005 ug/L

0 .005

< 0 .023 ug/L 0 .023

<

0

.040 ug/L 0 .040

< 0 .071 ug/L 0 .071

<

0 .046 ey/L 0 .00

< 0 .038 Ug/L

04034

< 0 .032 ug/L

0 .032

< 0 .010 ug/L

0 .010

---

U a~

Jr,L. JL

"

. 020 'l

i'

.O. ECX X49, 112G N . i-IION'I S'111EOY

r:Ii' J r!LM, MN 50073-0249

r-I

(50))

:154-Ci617 VV

.'-' :1S (000) i'J2-3bs_) i.

:

.-(Su%) ilt .I

..':9:U

dG : 'ahls'QlI LOftQi1'TJNiI'1i;9z1'2~r'i1!7r

1 L z Deporting Limits

BTEX Sample pH < 2

J dntu for this repo t has bees approved by MVTL LLLorzttory W ua

.gew 1:t

.

Report Date_ 3 ug loss

I'L'DI) NOW :

RETEC4113

dkCOUYA ST STE 400

ST PAUL NN 55101

Project Name : BOW VOLA,IL

EPA. SF•'-846

Method 802.0/5030

50DIFIED

Lab Number : 9J-L16546

Noili Order 't : 21-275

nccount 1

: 01H915i

Date Received : 17 Jul 1998

Date Sawpled : 15 Jul 1098

Tcwporature at Receipt

: ON ICE

Project Nuwber : 3-1908-'00

PVOC Analysis Date

: 23 Jul 1992

PVOO Dilution Factor : 1

5&urplc Description

: MV-1

ANALYiE

Ic'-rzene:

Result

21.9 -

.0

Units

pub -

RL

I .1

Analyst

Kl---0

-----

is lweue

ppb

1.0

KG

Ethyl Heuzene

5.5

pub

1.1

KE

xylenes (Total.)

7 .2

T,pb

3

.5

RE

Aer ;-irL {SURLZOCATE) RECOVERY

:

101 Y

---

°

.Ci F .u. ccr 7.c . S1 %o tJ . F;tu

T

5

TF1cI=T

M14

T0 ,249

p-'cEUPFTEN'SL (SURROCATY) RECOVERY

: 124

Sample Writ interferccl llith

U TVV S detection but

not Fluorescence detccciort .

Quantitiud using Fluorescence detector

.

only

RL = Reporting Limits

ll d-

.tu for this report hni been

approved h hiVCL Laboratory YLiuugcwtait

.

rI IOt' F:

(:071

35;-0 ::17 W!" :S t100) f(i2-3E5i F) X (5uf

! S-2150

5v ,, • J:

.r Jia!(JtLc31 1'3109^ NL :ttEi1T%U1': T

Ukpurt Date

: 3 Any 1`7_18

Lab Humber

: 9G-L1EW

lock Oidev 61 21-20

YEDD AWNING

Account 1 : 01`1'159

AQVC

:'l : NACOUTA ST 5'1'5 QUO

F:'!' PAUL I1r

65101

llatc UeceiYed : 1'1 Jul . 1908

Date Sampled : 15 Jul 19Jii

Teicper"ttuce at lceceipt : ON ACE

Dnaject Oune

: 'FSNSF EGLA,TL

Project Nuwbac : 3-1'i0tt-10U

EFTA SW-06 'Method 9310 : M

e tho d Detection Liwits

Date Extracted : 22 Jul 19 1.)0

dl:tsymirlcsd according to 40CFR, Appandi :c 8,

Date Ana.lynt:d

: 30 Jul 1`7 :10

Pint 136, 1`i9Z

.

DiLuticu Factor : 1

Suuiple Description_ MW

!

FOLYNUCL'LAR .".1WhL T

:C ICCOI't0 .,StBONS

Result Units EL

1--rila

•,

:Lyl IJ pcLthsl,_ri

. .

51 .20

ug/L

U .U ;O

2-FiethyI . N phi'1

; 1e,i~

12 .40 W /L

0 .031

B.ccrlsi,hthene

4 .000 ug/L - 0 .041

ltceil .[lht'aVletl~

< 0

.600 1)t'/L

0 .601)

Artthracene

<

0.029 a /L

0.029

6erlzu(3)snthr :rcerle

0

.050

ug/L

0

.005

iienzo(a)pyreae

( 0.061 ug/L 0 .061

1 nzo(b)iluorvtthene

< 0.062 ug/L

0

.062

u o(El'li)pe yleae

(

0.024

ug/L

0 .0211

F3enxo(lc)fluot-authrull :

< 0 .071

ug/L

0 .071

Chryserte

0

.080 ug/L 0 .00

Uibenzo(ah)anthrac . ;nu

< 0 .023 ug/L 0 .023

t

:luoranthene

( 0

.040 ug/L 0-040

lluorane

2 .700

ug/L 0-071

indeuo('1,2,3-cd)pyr ..ita

< 0 .046 ug/L 0 .046

Nxr,'iiLhtJt¢e

6 .900

ug/L

0 4 038

5 .100

ug/L 0 .032

Yyr c

0 .800 ug/L

0 .010

---

':13 U/I00UTA 8T STE 400

97 PAUL AN 55101

MOM i H t i L'."-

;

J ,C .

1125 N . N l0r!T SPREE I

iJEV ULP&wjN ;",i.U73-0249

HUNG j6U -i) 354 .0517

cuFTS (800) 782-3557 FAX (5u7 361- :'.ui;d

RL = Reporting Li

::.i t_;

ITXX Sample pM t 7-

LL date for this report has been z_pproved by I4VTL Lubotatory 'iL

nagewenf .

itVt~w..'c+uS:rw"

. .CJ . .uJ,:4 .:- ..

.aL

, " , . yL: . ::W.1!ti:f6r4

.:^w=1CLusy~+I%LLl2Ylti .+

.

..m--Oaut..~ . W ::. ._!_. wa-.~w~r

'v

:ular . -

y

..

1• • .p

.

. •:

Date Received : 11 01 19'911

Date

Sampled:

15 Jut

1993

Temperature at iceceipL : 0(1 ICE

Pcoject Name

: BNS1 50LA,1L

Project Number : 3--1208-400

EPA SW-06 Method 8020/2030 MODIFIED

PVOC Analysis Dale : 23 Jul 1098

PVOC Oilutiicn Factor

: L

Sauiple Description : W-14

£NALYTE

benzene

Result

1 .3V -

Units

ppb

RL

1 .1

Analye:t

KL

Toluene

2.9

npb

i.0

Kr:

Ethyl Bennene

4.7

ppb

i.1

h ,

Xylenes (Total)

< 3 .5 ppb

3 .5

f.E

AAA-TFT (SUMOGA'1E) [tEC00ERY : 107

i :rg .: EAN 1S'QUAL

is

r

O1tTUetizTi

it PrOiCi ?

Report Oatc : . aug 1903

Lab Nul ber

: 98-L1GD •7

(Jock

Drder 4 : 21-2275

TCoi7 WONN1NC

MEL;

Account 0

019159

---

J . U W

_.

H n K'-

W U11111, KtIA

56073- :1_ .

Sample

matrix

Werfered with

U .V

. detection but

not

Fluorescence leteMun-

QuantifiQd using

Fluore5cenua

detector only .

VL =

Reporting ; Limits

,11 data• ioc tidzs rej,-orL

hits been

approved

by WWI,

;'I

;OW

: 1501) 3 :i&07 vJ,CCS toof)) i02-35S-1 F;C2~(

{i01)

jU', 2J J

r-,12

4,j "I"! C

Uepurt DON : 3 nu, 100'

Lab Number

:

Vark Ordar

THU RURAIM

Account

RETEG

90-LUGO

! : 11-20,

;7 : U15J .59

413 UnCOUTA ST ST2 400

ST WL A

05101

Date Reczived : 11 Jut 1993

Date Samplad

: 15 Jul 1993

Temperature at Raceipw 0t IC!"

Project Lq-me : 13NSO tou ' lL

Project Oabjbar : 3-190o-400

EPA SW-546 KUM 8310

: gothod

DuLectio" Limits

Date

jxccactod!

22 Jul 0%

detarwinE6

ucwor ai yy to 100y,

Appendix

Data Analyzed

: 30 Jul 190

Putt, 13G, 100,

Dilution pactoe

: I

SawpLe Duscription : MW-1a

.

IfYDIIOCARDONS

Result Un L is R L

===== =223=

ug/L

====3vC""00

U

.010 .

c- Mat yl Nap&WeLa

< 0,034 ug/L

0 .034

AnUnMPhthWe

2 .200 ug/L C .U41

Acenaphkhyle=

< 0 .

coo

ug/L

0 .60()

Anthrawwo

0 .240

ug/L 0

.0111

0 .1,10 u :j, / L

0 .000

< 0 .061

ug/L

0

.061

0

0 .062

.024

ug/L

uy/L

MR0

.024

Uenzo(k)fluovanthrvne

< 0 .071

ug/L