1. page 1
    2. page 2
    3. page 3
    4. page 4
    5. page 5
    6. page 6
    7. page 7
    8. page 8
    9. page 9
    10. page 10
    11. page 11
    12. page 12
    13. page 13
    14. page 14
    15. page 15
    16. page 16
    17. page 17
    18. page 18
    19. page 19
    20. page 20
    21. page 21
    22. page 22
    23. page 23
    24. page 24
    25. page 25
    26. page 26
    27. page 27
    28. page 28
    29. page 29
    30. page 30
    31. page 31
    32. page 32
    33. page 33
    34. page 34
    35. page 35
    36. page 36
    37. page 37
    38. page 38
    39. page 39
    40. page 40
    41. page 41
    42. page 42
    43. page 43
    44. page 44
    45. page 45
    46. page 46
    47. page 47
    48. page 48
    49. page 49
    50. page 50
    51. page 51
    52. page 52
    53. page 53
    54. page 54
    55. page 55
    56. page 56
    57. page 57
    58. page 58
    59. page 59
    60. page 60
    61. page 61
    62. page 62

 
I
W
.
September 28, 2006
(VIAFACSIMILE2
The Honorable Bradley Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100
. West Randolph, IlthFlooi
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Re
:
State of Illinois v . Community Landfill Company, Inc
. and City of
Morris
; PCB 03-191
Dear Mr. Halloran
:
Consistent with your direction of earlier today, please find attached a copy of the City's
Response to Community Landfill Company, Inc
.'s Motion to Cancel Hearing and the State's
Response in Opposition thereto,
harles F . Helsten
8
chelstenc4906
hinshawlaw.corn
CFH:dmh
cc:
Clarissa Grayson
Chris Grant
Re E,~
OFFICE
®
. _ .
ATTOMLYS AT LAW
100 Path Avenua
SE-1)
2 8
2006
PO
. Box 1389
Rockford, IL 61105-1389
Pollution
STATE OF
Control
ILLINOISBoard
T 8154904900
F 815490-4901
wv.w .ninshawlaw.co m
Arizona California
Florida Illinois Indiana Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri
NewYork Oregon Rhode Island Wisconsin
7050N65,1 806799

 
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS„
)
Complainant,
)
V .
)
PCB No . 03-191
an
COan_TllinoisIllinois
Corporation,
MunicipalTY
LANDFILL
Corporation,,
and
COMPANY,
CITY OF MORRIS,INC
.,
))
)
Respondents .
)
INCRESPONSE
.'S MOTION
TO RESPONDENT,
TO CANCEL HEARING
COMMUNITY
AND
LANDFILL
COMPLAINANT,
COMPANY,STATE
OF ILLINOIS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO CANCEL
HEARING
NOW
. COMES the CITY OF MORRIS, an Illinois Municipal
Corporation, by and
through its attorneys, HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP, and for its Response to
both the
Motion of Respondent, Community Landfill Company, Inc
.'s. Motion to Cancel Hearing and the
Complainant, State
of
Illinois', Response in Opposition to same, states as follows
:
As indicated in oral arguments presented
o Hearing Officer Bradley Halloran
earlier today, the City has and continues
.
to
maintain that it is essentially a putative, ancillary
Respondent in this matter, essentially caught in a "cross-fire" between the Complainant
State of
Illinois and Respondent Community Landfill Company, Inc . (the entity which, even by this
Honorable Board's admission at Page 14 of its February 16, 2006 Interim Order, conducted the
day to day waste disposal activities at the facility in question . In turn, the City has made its
position clear that it vigorously objects to having been found a party that "conducted a waste
disposal operation" in this Honorable Board's Interim Order of February 16, 2006-
2.
The City believes that actual prejudice will result to its position in this matter if
this
.hearing is not continued tuitil such time as Edward Ptuim can be compelled to testify
.
The
City. has included Edward Praim on its Witness List for the hearing in question
(copy
of such
RECESVED
CLERK'S
OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLL`TOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SAP 2 8 2006
STATE
Pollution OF
ILLINOIS
Board
?M2967, 1 M06289

 
witness designation being Marked-Exhibit A-and attached hereto and incorporated herein by this -
reference and hereby served upon the parties) .
3.
Since (as established by the record in this matter) the cost of complying closure,
post-closure financial assurance requirements runs literally in the millions of dollars, obviously
since the State is claiming that the City is potentially responsible for such costs and expenses, it
is essential that a full hearing be afforded to all parties, with all witnesses andallmaterial
evidence being received at that hearing .
4.
As indicated in oral arguments presented to Hearing Officer Halloran earlier
today, based upon its review of other depositions and other testimony given by the Pruim
Brothers in other related matters, it fears that if only one corporate representative (i .e., Robert
Pruim) is called in this matter that corporate representative will simply demurrer and defer to
knowledge possessed by Mr. Edward Pruini (who is presently medically unavailable to testify in
this matter at the hearing which is now scheduled) . In tam, since Mr. Edward Pruim was the
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the corporation, and since closure post-closure matters
by their very essence relate to financial issues, the City submits that it is absolutely essential that
it
be allowed to question Mr. Edward Pruim
.
in detail as to why the parties find themselves in the
present situation they do before this Honorable Board.
5 .
The City respectfully submits that its position in this matter s entirely consistent
with this Honorable Board's Supplemental Order of June 1, 2006, which clarifies and expands
upon the Board's, Initial Interim Order of
February 6, 2006. The text of that Order makes clear
that (pursuant to Section 33(c) and 42(h) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act),
not only
Board Member Melas, but the entire Board expects a full, complete and detailed explanation
as
to
: (1) how the landfall facility in question found itself in the condition it did as of the
initiation
2
70502967x1806269

 
of th s enforcement r ctI ~ ; (2) who was responsible for the condition of the landlilt (3) what (if
any) further steps have been taken to address concerns raised by the State during the course of
this action.
6.
In response to the State's allegation that a "hearing" on the "proposed remedy" is
necessary in this matter, the City notes that at Page 4 of the Board's order of June 1, 2006, the
Board notes that the purpose of the Act (and the financial assurance obligations set forth therein),
are to ensure that neither health nor the environment is harmed from the operation of a municipal
solid waste landfill
. The Board's June 1, 2006 goes further in noting that the Board must
interpret the Act as it applies " . . .in
each individual instance." (Emphasis added)
. As indicated
in
oral arguments had before Hearing Officer Halloran earlier today, in his 106 page deposition,
expert witness Devin Moose has indicated that based upon the current status of activities which
have been undertaken at the facility in question, no eminent and substantial threat to the human
health and the environment is posed by the facility in question
. (See pp
. 70-75) . As noted by
Mr
. Moose in his deposition, the site is essentially closed, and for the past two years, site
characterization and preliminary closure activities have been undertaken by the City (pending
final resolution of the City's alleged status as a party responsible for the posting of closure, post-
closure financial assurance) to assure that the human health and/or the environment are not
harmed. (See pp. 76-80 and Moose Deposition Exhibit 8)
. As such, (and as noted by Mr.
Moose
in his deposition_ testimony), the purpose of the financial assurance provisions of the Act have
beenn squarely met
. In _turn, accordingly, there is no immediate need for the conducting of a
remedy heating in this matter, and the more paramount concern is affording all
parties a
complete hearing on all issues and factors noted by the Board in its June 1, 2006 order
.
3
,U502967,1 106289

 
.7.
In summary, the City wishes to again make clear that it does not take sides with or
suppott one part or the
other in
this matter
. Rather, the City's sole and controlling concern is that
it be afforded a full and fair hearing on all the evidence which exist in this case.
In turn, it is the City's fear that if it is not allowed to examine the Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Co-Respondent, Community Landfill Company, Inc . in this matter,
it could be substantially prejudiced, and the taxx payers of the City could face exposure for
literally millions of dollars of closure, post-closure obligations without having been afforded the
opportunity to fully and completely present its case . Put a different way, this Honorable Board
has consistently held in, hearings such as this that for its own benefit (as well as the benefit of
each party to such an action) a complete and full hearing on all relevant evidence should be
conducted, and that the needs of all parties for a complete and full hearing should be satisfied.
The City would submit that the basic precepts of fundamental fairness established by this Board
required nothing less .
WHEREFORE, the City of Morris respectfully requests that the hearing in this matter be
continued
until such time as both Edward and Robert Pruim are physically and medically able to
testify in this
matter.-
Dated:
Respecttull.
On el, alf of the C
Charles F . Helsten
Hinshaw
.& Culbertson LLP
100 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 1389
Rockford, IL 61105-1389
815-490-4900
This document utilized 100%
4
recycled paper products
.
axles F. Helsten
One ofIts
Attorneys
70502967v1so67g9

 
ATFIDAVIT OF
SERVICE
The undersigned. pursuant to the provisions of Section 1-109 of the Illinois Code of Civil
Procedure, hereby under penalty
of
perjury wider the laws of the United States of America,
certifies that on _ . 2006, she caused to be served a copy of the
foregoing upon :
Mr. Christopher Grant
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 W
. Randolph St ., 20th Fl .
Chicago, IL 60601
Mark LaRose
Clarissa Grayson
LaRose & Bosco, Ltd
.
200 N
. LaSalle, Suite 2810
Chicago, IL 60601
Ms. Dorothy Guim, Clerk
Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
Bradley Halloran
Hearing Officer
Pollution Control Board
100 W
. Randolph, Suite 11
Chicago, IL 60601
A copy of the same was enclosed in an envelope in the United States mail at Rockford, Illinois,
proper postage prepaid, before the hour of 5
:00 p .m., addressed as above .
I it I
.* ~/'
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON
100 Park Avenue
P.O. Box 1389
Rockford, IL 61105-1389
(815)
490-4900
70415200v
1 6062A9

 
BEFORE THE ILLL'4OIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS„
)
Complainant,
)
V. .
)
PCB No. 03-191
COMMUNITY LANDFILL COMPANY, INC ., )
an
Illinois Corporation, and CITY OF MORRIS, )
an Illinois Municipal Corporation,,
Respondents.
)
WITNESS LIST AND EXHIBIT LIST
NOW COMES the Respondent, City of Morris, by and through its attorneys, Hinshaw &
Culbertson,
. LLP, and files its Witness List and Exhibit List, as follows :
WITNESS LIST
1 .
Devin Moose
2.
William Crawford
3 .
John Enger
4 .
.J.P. Pelnarsh Sr.
Robert Pzuim .
Edward Pruim
R. Michael McDermont
Joyce Munie
Blake Harris
.
10.
Cristina Roque
11 .
Ellen Robinson

 
1'_ .
Mark 1'.etzlaff
13 .
Brian White
14
.
The City also reserves the right to call any other witness in rebuttal of any
pos Lion taken by the State or Community Landfill Company in presentation of their respective
cases.
EXHIBIT LIST
Any and all exhibits and/or information attached to airy pleadings, motions or
other documents filed for the record in this case
;
2 .
Ally and all documents, records, reports, information, and/or other tangible things
referred to in all depositions taken and all discovery requests (and responses thereto) made in this
matter;
3 .
Any and all documents on file concerning the Morris Community Landfill with
the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
-
4.
Any and all documents produced by any party in response to information riders
attached to depositions notices or discovery requests (including, but not limited to all documents
produced by the City of Morris in connection with the depositions of John Enger, William
Crawford and De-Yin
Moose).
The City also reserves the right to call any other exhibits in rebuttal of any
position taken by the State or Community Landfill Company in presentation of their respective
cases.
2
70502427+1 606299

 
Charles F . Helsten
Hinshaw & Culbertson UP
100 Park Avenue
P .O. Box 1389
Rockford, IL 61105-1389
815-490-4900
k
Respectfully
Oz>„ eliaif of
submitted,the
CI7OF MORRIS
Charles F . Helsten
e of Its Attorneys
This document utilized 100% recycled paper products .
3
70502427, 1 GO6289

 
5
6
23
24
°EFrfF fIL ILLibo1 :
: ~t7..lLI IC91 LY-"T.'F
;:L EGL'dJ
F t'LE OF ThE SI
:,TE 1.X 1ii.I7f
:
.,
rcroL~i~<~tt,
)
w .
))
r(F
(Enf,rmier,tNa
. rli-15'1
•L
ati)
OOi1JRTY
CITY
mnicipat
an Illinois
OF RV
LANDFILL
srporatim,IS,
corp,ratim,
aILtirnisCOPANY,
Lid
INCth
Re<p-sd-lts
.
The ckpaitim of DEVIN A . MBE,
P.E., DEE
taken before Link A
. Lace, .R.SC
. R .P .R.,
a Notary
RbLic in
;i o for the Canty of M0eiiry, State of
ILLir»is, taken at the offic,s of Show Enviroarntel,
lrc ., 1156 N . Fifth RvLQ, St
. Charles, Illinois, on
nl&edey the 2nd of Agst,
A.C., 2016, sd,ndAed at
the hour of 1 o'clock Lit aaIrirnirg at 1
:10 p.m.
FRE ENT :
STATE
188
at :
uMRAssistant
.
C
Raxbld,
.
ILLINOIS
CNRISTQ'NER
Attorney
Street,
ATT(RNEY
J
.
20th
Ca,eraLGRANT,a7NERALFLaor
(3312214-53
1
BYP1021
ILLINOIS
.
: MRappear-.d
North
. BRLtF
ENVIROfNTAL
onGrad
A .
behalf
AvaianbLER,
PRJTEC[ICN
ofAssistant
;
ComplainantAGENCYCounsel
5
R 0OI
Ir7gfield
)-7-5544ernc
apps
19776red
IL
on
62794-9276bdialf
of Illinois EPA;
LINDA LANCE REP[iiTING --
847\658\6918
(Wltrcsa Swam
.)
DEVIN A . CSE, P .E., DEE,
havirg been first dAy sworn, was exanirS and testified
as follows
:
DWIINATICN
BY MR
. GR09
:
Mr . Moose, m7 none is O,ris trait a l I'm
with the Attorney General's office . I'm the attorney
reploeeitirg the State in this osa . First, Let me ask
you, have yw givn
a depeaitien before?
A
Yes
.
Approximately how nay tine
A
I'm not sire, six, eight, tan, twelve,
saiethirg like that .
Have yon ever testified in mart?
A
Yes .
And can you tell me, in what revs you've
testified?
A
I''e been in front of the Pollution Control
& rd . I hove been in fruit of the City of
Chicago
in
their, I think it's Admnistrerhe Law jju:pe, L'~r not
sure if that's corrvi t, ad I have ban in front of sonic
ether veto havirg to d, with coltutim cmtro
facilities that I don't recall at this time .
1
3
"c'fYl_
Lr3tiri
fillcn>n,
I? : M5,
North
LIARi
&
IL
KN7]
9)191LoSeiLe
$,k
LTDOITLER
.
Stmt,
GRAY57i:&rite
2810
(12)
i.ar~tf6+.-441-,;ll
Pn .nreMtenelt . 1rcof
. ;
Be,prcat CmiN.rnlty
kitUSRVBYRockfcrd1(10
P(815)
.O
:
.
`RMornsPerk
sneered
Box
40~-4976
.
.
6
C1UNCLES
1389A
WLBERTSYN
.
L
ate61105-1349an
behalf
F . ILLSTEN
up
of Respmiart City of
PRESENT VIA SPEAKERPHONE
:
Ms-,
ILLINOIS
d,ristine
ENV1RCNENTALRogue,
Boreal
PROTECTIONof
LadAGFIAY
WITNESS :
INDEX
DEVIN
OF
A
.
D(LMINATION
17.L.6E,'FE., PEE
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\658\6918
Do yaw
raieiher if ay of those sere
a torceta-it p'vsedirgs, in other words, atorcoreit
action Order- the Emir meat Protection Act, for
exaipl8?
A
Sae of them probably were
. I don't recalt
the apacifirs of then .
Were some of then also pennittirig types of
hearings?
A
Yes .
And in eedi case did you testify for the
Fe-m 410 was seeking the permit is mad to a
go emient agaeyp
A
No
.
o
In what cases have you testified on baheLf of
a amertnett agv'cy?
A
Athwgh not Fort of a Lasuft, I repesatt
terry unit^n of goverrmert . I've worked for rionrLy 60
condo`. in the State of Illinois, anettty mployerd Iry
over 20 mnidpwlittes in the State of Illinois . Arid
s'.nn of them that rare to mind as far as iinrkirg for the
jurisdiction s cTimf to the oppli®nt or tiie landfill
d.i'7er, I ,,,[We
the City of Chicago likes 1 a the
-
ty of diicbgo's e._rt . I deitepesi the City of
ward's la'dfiLi rrsiLetiors, trained all of their
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
BY :
FIr
MS .
GRANTGRAY
SN
~sPAGE99
LINE4
1WE( Of E4IIBITS
Flb$F]R DESCRIPTION
'r
5
-
turriaum -vitae
A
LINE
32
1020-O. IEPA l.adfilt Inspection . . 25
103
Rsty.,},n's
Answers to 69
S>{plaieitat
InterrogatoriesArt3rers
to State's . . . 69
3
6
Prenotaa
InterrogatoriesCLusae
Cost Estimate - 102
1D
7
Pnamture
Parcel
Closure
B
Coat Estimate
- 1(T2
10
8
Shaw Emironnatal
Parcel A
aLteryetive . . . 102
10
4
ONtlinei
closureWpnoy3iof
tasks cEted 6-13-06 . . . .
103
11

 
i
F
6
a
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
9
20
22
Z3
24
initial irryrtors, rid
was
an
epert for the City of
lhingo m ntrercw ttxdfilI siting is&)?s, vperaticr d
.
iolr,
iha or allpnf vfoletim dens . And one thatt
cams to mini we the Lwrd YTA Laks 1i2-d shorn, Lard
Fed Laces 130th, I have worked for other Counties
reixesnttirg their Interest also for FrcEebly dozens of
different disputes .
(E)hibi t No. 1 Has mar)s for
r
identifloatim an 8-2-06 .)
a
I an going to show you what's marked as
Edribit Nurber 1- And I believe ynu'w identified this
as your CV or o iculun vitae
: is that correct?
It is-
Q
why don't yo.i hold onto that . I want to ask
you #nit your a deaden ad eperierce ad you've sort
of started on that . Sb, why rln't yw ga>:ralty tell rte
abaet yatr pat-seconiery sehcot eoLceriai?
A
I have a Bachelor's in Scisre dgre from
the University of Missai-i-Rotla, I have been involved
in --
and that is a foes in end dxlble major in
geological end Beotalnicat engineering . Those are
having to do with the study of soils std grnrdeter, I
workai for a geotoctnieal
engineer
on and off from '77
ihra.h
'83- Beginning in '83 1 started wrkirg for
--
LIMA LANG . R8 tING -- B47\658\6918
7
a contiruirg edratia, ra4atrelant that I'm regiired to
Ineintain . So, it's just a higher Level of accreditation
in the area of solid waste engineering .
New old ere yaP
A
I'm 49 on the 2nd of Mgst
.
Q
I was going to say, it's an awful tot
fF
stuff . Are yw free lllirois origirelly?
A
Yeah, grew yo in this area, lived here my
whole life,
a
And where do yvl now reside?
A .
In St . diarh just outside of town .
Can you describe briefly your invotvarent
with ladfilts specifically, penis nit waste disposal
facilities?
A
Probably beginning in about the early 'Bo's,
I'm going to say f83 or 'B4, I berate irmlvsi working
on
Landfills Fradamretaly from a m-stnrtaSility an
geoteivhical aspect. At the time there were not wry
exte-siw
regulations
irvoLved in latfills and my early
ladfillclient-rWaste Matagaipit, Irmiporated
. I
had lead retaired by then on a-pore 4rcrea;irgly k is .
to help then with isat of instruction dewaterirv,
• sloe
stability antysis, urstnctirg liners and so
forth, And seas of my asrly
essi wants were the
LIMA: LANCE . .REP' rING
247\658\6918
Q
t hat year first proteacitre jct ct of
elL e7
A
Yes,
Q
And 11.ct is clarify, 4cs your
ciagr-i- ir;-- .i
atlinttrircj'
A
Yes, I have a Bachelor's of Sciert degree in
civil egireerirg- I'm a Registered Profassia al
Ergireer in Illinois and nine
otter
states, 1' .e best
awardmd the levet of Diploma b the American Academy of
Envircwnental Ergire?rs with eiptasis
in solid waste
egireerirg-
Q Can you eclain vhat that bans?
A
It's a higher level
of accreditation- It
ra}aires that yea becae a Registered Professional
Ereirmr, it ra}Ares that yw
-- in all the chines
that entails
. It rs a res, I thin* it's seven or eight
years of egeria,ae
as a Registered Professional
Ergireer, and than it also requires a passing of anther
written e>'amratiQ+, vctaaive written mamratim in a
pertiwlar area of expertise- It also then-rspii~ yw
to pass an oral swamretiat by a panel
of got peas- A
nationwide peel of peers are essarbled ad
you have a
day tong deposittan like asking you different 9stioc
about ynr par tiw(ar area of the itdatry, it also has
LIMA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
tdoo*s-i Ladfill, Settler's Hill lsdfitl, and a
landfill
in Danny, Cartcctiwt which was a big valley
fill that I w-ked on.
Over the years I got more involved
in landfills
just !erase of the increasing scrtairry that they
received, increased regutatoiy rec}nrerents
. And I got
irwollej in grarriecer monitoring, hytnuoeolagicet
evaluations of nal sites . All of that detvtxl really
gmd with
my edratimat hackgrend in ga'logicat and
g itednical engineering. And ea I arntined to get
we involved, I'd say son jiere in the Late '&Vs,
probably
'87;,
'88, sarevhere slag those lirm, I pretty
mth cawertal ful l-time to arviMmental
egineerirg.
And the ervii-a anal egireerirg fonses in tat arms,
solid waste tadfitls and rerSiatioi type projects .
Ard I participated in the develapian
of the ladfill
regulations in Illinois in wgwttirg and working with
the scientific peat on
that
.
O
Who ores )nr client at the tine yw we
camvttirg an the nt-aelapnait of the solid waste
rc~julatiae?
A
solid Waste AgsYy of northern Cot Caht
Q ware you irM iwd in the case, the valet
c e7
LIMA LPNCf REPtZI9NG --
847\668\fAIB

 
r
8
9
10
th€j 5atior rro
atci rawer for tat'
vase.
roar' . my ptle .
q
Nri ycu'iic ua-rer rly egaLapxl wr*-h c3w
i-.on_nnsl, rc:Vpura'
.~,
A
Yes .
Haw lrrt7 ha"? ycu treed with 6he .?
A
Ik wore aca,i red by
Shaw apx¢drretely two
and a half years ago .
Ntm you say 'Sa'n
A
we ware before that ErrAracrn . so, whit Sheu
two and a half years and its predecessors probably for
nearly ten
. So, I haven't qht work and moved . I jtst
charged lasiress cart, i f you will
.
And y ar bsircs cartel say, Dirtctor of Stan
Ennvir-oiinttaL- Shat are your rgFnstbilities as
di rector'?
A
8y job is rmlLy to nn the St . Charles,
Illinois office . W have 30 eiply ees hare
. We fonts
m solid waists ad ar+irmrcrrtal rerediaticn type
pvje'ts . I'm also retinal director of solid waste
planing for Shaw Erviiar,eAal nationwide, ad we're
also the, if yes will, go-to affic for siting and
davalapiert of new Landfills or erfedtrg Iasfills
retierwide . 4Wra arrently Working prahsbly m six
or
LINDA LANCE RFPQtTING -- 847\658\6918
financial o¢eriacalsic-1 or firvrcial perfonmanse or
financial gerartees begin at the
very
bgimirg which
in other genres is called an engiineer's cut estimate .
An cgireer's mot estimate is
is to dc-elcp
projections of ,stnrtiai rests . In the tatdfill
rrglllatiors that egwreer''s cost estimate is Ls&J
pmdanirattly in posting finaciat a4sjr tc for
Landfills ad mare specifically premature
clue-re
a'd
post-cLvure cam for lardfilts .
G
Let lie s. ,rate my gaetion a little bit
laaee I guess there's two thirty I'm thinking of . One
would be develcplre a net estimate for -- that would be
in caipliatce with firecial assurarice regulations, in
other words, smething that it essettially estimate,
closure and post-strobe sure, and the scared -- the
satrd part of that
would be in acttatty working with
the variow rrerhe-nuns for piarnirg fira-ciaL assurace
.
So, let rte split the q tic, µ,
.
A
I axierstad the
cp tior .
a
okay.
A
Art that ic_ a rrscsery pracrsor for
LINDA
LANCE
REPORTING .-- 847\658\6918
11
Q
1
ci1r1' state irehdirp the SSwias
.
0
or of this office?
A
ee .
w
t csy . ye, Say ycu +:re irnot', & in -
eanrzntina rn solid waste ;-gutatims . 1 asarre that
ycu'r^_ £aniliar with the solid waste resulatio s in
ILlirois?
A
Yes-
Arid with the Envira-urrital Protection Act --
A
Yes .
Q
-- and the regiirelents of it? Are yes
funiliar with firrrcial assurace re Jirermts
--
A
Yes .
--
pertainvg to La-dfhlls7
A
Yes,
Haw you ever assisted, either with Ertv(r- ,
or in your professiaet egeriesx, ever assisted in
d>taining
IF irarial asslrar
rn
for a landfill client or
for a goverrnmtat agency or something like that?
A
Yes
.
a Can you discrite
ya-r
a¢eriace with,
specificatly with ±tainirg financial assu'ate far
Ladf i l Is?
A
air experie ce, ny e'¢eriace in obtaining
at eg(nocring cwt estimate?
A
Yeah . The state re4iires that a professioreL
agireer be involved in the prawn . so, that process
of developing the rent estimate is
hre ty a
professiaal egirezr and has to be certified by a
ae9ietrrcd Prafessiaral Engineer- .
Nd,ody else has the
authority in the state of thirds to do that .
The send pert is actwLtygettirp the firaefat
irstitwtim, the 6adirn an -y, for
whatever other
ncrha-iien of there which are ten, which is the flrntiel
part, to acxpt arid Lee that agin er-'s mot estimate to
get firacial assurance . As far As if* smsd part, we
cagult with firemial irstitutias ad I'LL jest
go
heck to the galefill exeipLe for enarpLe . In that cue
I thick we jested fifty, fifty some minim collars
worth of pblic debt for that project . I
worked
closely
with the tadirg agencies to verify the costs and
reate P oj~icre for three facilities ad the issue
of lord camp, That's a phlic agency. On private type
agcries, like a lad mtp, which it was at the time a
gr'cs iffeld lrrdfitl site aced tby a eieLL private
de+tilcper, he seekad
--
0
Where was that?
A
That buss in Lasalle Carry, Illirois . He
LINDA LANCE RFTSRT1wG --
847\5&$\691a
obtaining m 44xcpriete iretrurett for tirociat
72
23
Q
Ntm you say that,
yai mere in arnirg up with
24

 
1
2
3
6
ttxdu,aI n riryrolre aS w-LL as some mniCiPat
ns:itnteo
: ad e werkrrl cam those isaes also oloseLy
H H , ~ •wriaL Srrtituticre in
:tire that
sway
rrd Oettire the Tirti CiaL assume that he rrafd .
SO,
the
process kind of chases whether you're tatkirQ
public
or Frivate . Ard with the large pblicly traid
mnFalios we gererally are involved in the, tricks the
egireer's cost estimate or estimating the cost, is
working inside their internal pro forma . Each one of
them have a separate
mrodaL that they use so we wvk with
then irdividsally .
0
Is it fair to say that
you
really have m
irrdepth Wcwta~e of the
financial
assurance pocess as
for ea post-closure, curare ad pat-ctoraxe care? -
A
Well, I uSrstad had the cost estimates are
put don. I tr&rsthnd the different mechanisms . I'm
rot aai ecomnist
. I'm rot an wcuntant but I clearly
uTierstard
and
I have a tot of erperie -' in saline
With different institutions in getting thra* that
r87Jlatory hurdle .
0
Based on your emperie -ca as a
consulting
aeincer, is arranging for firwoial assurance for
Landfills, in other Words, with caaira up with a cost
. . :LINDA tAN1F .REPORTING ,--
. .847\~8
LINDA LANCE REFYRTING --
847\658\6918
13
15
grade
. AM we have to secure safe rotors, close the
facility with an ereineered cap and potentially develop
additional
storm water related facilities
. wk cam
LP
with gnntity estimates . We we a unit cast type method
to came ep with an estimated enstnstion cast for a
third party to core In and implarai that work . We then
do the same for post-closure care . After the facility
is closed, the owner or operator are rehuired to
maintain d esirre care for a period of
i{I
to 30 years or
more and that is monitoring costs, erosion repairs,
repairs to the top cap and
sedimentation basins . We
then develop a cost estimate for a third party to
perform that work
and
s,±mit all of that to the IEPA for
review,, and we have always gotten re
permits and got
thrcz i that prtee3s
.
0
1 woder if
-- did we skip a step? Be ase
the first thing you
mentioned
was prarature chance
cost
estimate and than a post-closure rare estimate . How
about, you kaw, say a planed ounce cost estimate,
would that be the same as a pmenetvre clesue or is that
a rut s- that you have to ge-aate as well?
A
A plaJt¢1 chosen cast ester ate?
0
in obier words, jest canirg LP With ctosr"
coats . Arid the may mesh I ask is hecaEe you just
11
12
2
3
L
5
6
7
15
6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1
2
3
A
It's the type of thing we do tut, you know, I
cant
speak for other u,- jLtirg ersireera . Some
mreultatts have more ca{soilities and e>jtrtise than
others .
0
Jest -- I would Like to cpiddy go throng,
the process, teal an your esperie-ce, of ha., --
of
romi g rp with a ocet estimate and in providing
fira-oial essrare . What I em thinking of specifically
is your interface with, in Illiroia, with ittirois EPA
in caning LIP with a cost estimate that ever)tody gees
m kw does that proms work?
A
Normally it's fairly straight forward In
Illirois . Illirois r>afJir a premature cLosre cost
estimate and that is, simply pit, that point in tine
where the Ladfi ll Would be most costly to close prior to
its closure . And the ergireer that's designing the
facility, in this case it wnJld to somebody like
ourselves,
estimate Woe, that World be gelretty . It's
at sore relatively early point in the lrrdfill's life
what there is -- noon the omsvatfm and waste is bald
LINDA L4MM REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
rrsatiawad a premature claque cost estimate that World
prthably be the most eJtpasive option
.
A
We talked about --
So, let me -- do you also hone to
-- rd
also coma up with a closure coat eatieate?
A Well, I don't think it's nee sserily
salethira
you
interact with the agency on baacse
facilities are closed as they're constructed rormally .
Q
How do you mean?
A
There's a firancial ircexiva ad goad
operating practice atutird that tacifiLls should be
closed as soon as practicable . You are eared to post
clssr cost estimates --' I'm sorry,
you
acs carts-ta,
and get same of that mxmy back if you close the
facility CIJickLy- I man fir every piece duet you
close, you receive that Money out of it, the closure
rust care.
Then you say closue, you near Like final
closure, in other Words, that portico of the Ladfill
would have everyttirg in place that it Imtd reed for
cleare?
A
Yes .
Q
Now
as far as workire With Illirois' IPA ad
gettire the nnhers apprLw d, and that's part of the
LINDA LANCE REFLRTING -- 8671658\6918
you
'I II.a.d ;a7 r-c chf feast tyr~. of firen.irfi
.
One is ?-iezte
14
sitimate aryl
they,
looklrs for the test or nayte
sarethirg that's n ccaptie-it way of n=tirg the
regalaticrs, is that romally the sort of thane a
ccrsuLtirg e-gireer rhs for a la-dfiLL client?

 
6
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2
22
Z
24
Fr r~ Isn't
it? In a her ,nr'+ yo i
_,n''
I, et rant
puiclnnntvw . It i,.-
1
hn .L.J"o the
il. Lireis 134 i,r E xrral
A
Yea,
Q
Aid for all --
fir, say, prereture clcsere,
for cLoerro costs ad toe
pcct-clwse care?
A
Yes
.
Q
Had is that dt,e? Is it drat= always in a
permit
applicatiml
A
Wit, you brM, I thick it's also dale u r
a, by a cyaeit tree type piss, UA I thick
rornaily it's thrrugh a ptrnit aFplrcatiut .
So, for exarple, a Ladfill w,ul
.d be sedcirg
a dvelopmnt perirrnt or to open uF a trod new tadflLL
ad in its permit it World, it woutd in that permit
eFplicatim process would have per' thrash this,
estimating these coste for cI are a-d post-closre? Is
that acurate?
A
Yceh, I thick that's p~daniretely the way
it's doe
.
gray
. I an going to get a littto
more
sp~ific of What we are here far Which is the Morris
Community La,dfiLI case
. You are familiar with the
r oirg or with the else that the State has against
LINDA_ LANCE REPrRTING ---
867\658\6918
BY !R . GRANT :
• 24th thrash 27th
. Are you ptanirg m
testifying at that hearing or have you been asked to
testify at the hearing in the case?
A
I
have rot .
okay.
A
If I had -- did,
I forgot .
may-
A
I dn't rcsall as 1 sit here
.
MR . IELSIEN
: He will be asked. He was
asked to testify What he tha4tt it was earlier
. I gave
him eartier dates
.
BY Nit
. MANT,
a
dt, okay. Arid are you aware that's --
that
the pupcse of that hearing is for the PoLlutim Control
Board to tide What, if my, relief to grant the State?
A
lhrhcm .
• Am you
aware that the State's arse has to do
with the failure to provide ai-gnte financial
ass rarce
for the Morris Community Larrifill?
A
Yes .
AM ycu'm familiar with the Morris o-mm.nity
Ladf i i t?
A
Yes,
LINDA LANCE REEPMUNG --
847\(58\&918
19
hkrr leit .7 Carmnity Lcrdfill -- for C aiL'rity
tar}amyl Ctsprty s-d the City of Nurris?
A
sores 1 am .
,vc yw've hen cskai to teati=")y at the
hearrr.J
in this case?
A
Yes
.
Are yon
acre that the liability has already
tun fold toy the Pollution control
Beard in favor of
the State?
A
cm certain s~ccts .
Are you aware that -- cell, first off, are
y ru aware of the hearing that's sancUted for October of
this year
A
No .
Okay.
FR . HELSIE?l : I hsrer't had a chance, to
tell him that . Why dm 't
you
tell him When it starts .
I can't avow remember.
!R
. (RANT :
I can't r m i either . I
think it's the lost week in October. I think Tuesday
thrur#n
Friday are the dates to be kept r{nar, the last
week of mtcber .
MS
. l3'AYSW : Maybe the 23rd .
R .
w L182 : 24th .
LINDA LANCE
lipmuma -- V.7\655\6918
I'LL ask }w a little bit abort year
familiarity with the Morris Wmtnity Ladfill . You can
just tell me when, and I'm done Loddrg at the period
from 2000 to the presort, ikon
you first becaie aware of
potential p-obtets or Whet you first became involved
with the marris Caw pity Ladfill?
A
Beirg in the bsiress I thick I'll take
liberty and maybe go heyvd 2000 bar_
se,
1 don't know
exactly what recollections were More 2000 end Whet
Ware after
.
That's fire.
A
I'm in the Usirass every day ad have some
awareness of every facility in the state
. Morris
Comtnity . Lsdfitt is well Ioon to me before I was
mptoye3 by the City of Morris . I u
.*asterd ifro their
cuetrnar base .as . I .rdestad that
they were being
gernted by CLC and the, far Ladc of a better term, I'll
call thorn die Pruim brothers . Nd I was In the Late
'BO's writing the solid Waste pLan for Grirdy County so
I Gram acre of not only the facility bit its volumes,
its cyaerat caipliarm record
. I Wow that it wee cared
by the city
. I krsm it was operated lH a private
entity. so, there was protebly more
than a ge erul
aware a of
precisely what vas going m at that
LIMA LANCE REWING -- 847\658\61918

 
6
7
2
3
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
foci (ire, I ray haw war bee, ako d, ad I don't
recall e;S I sit here, I my hew eve, Is~n asked by a
fxiuote rrn]zrt? tc da an
'ircrrental aiclit of this
site to -;ka 4,ste . Sh cb a lot of ua# for large
axpratios that ask s to loot at facilities before
they direct waste to than . And I've looked at most of
the facilities in the state in that respect and I just
don't recall
whether w- did that in the 'HO's or rot as
I sit here . I was with another mwpay at the time and
I wvikfi't have these records with me .
Now lee went
you working with Gnldy County
on their solid waste plan? Do $11 recall?
A
You kr .M, I don't recall precisely.
Developing a solid waste plan is totally about an
ei,teeth north, at that tine a two year rxatlsem so, I
world say it was p-d
:ebly along those liras .
would you have, wand you have been aware of,
say rhfle you were dhirr that solid waste plan, aborl
Projecting c a ity for waste disposal at the Morris
rrnmliity Landfill?
A
I probabLy was at the tine, yeah .
Now abut permit applicatios, world you have
taken a look at permit applications fits for the Morris
ca mnity ladfill dirirg that period?
LIMA LP$E REPORTING -
847\658\6918
A
I ors to irnestigate the irapetion that was
dote by the State, Audi was in actdner I thick of that
year, and to evaluate whether there's validity to it,
how
serious
was it, and what the operator needed to do
.
Do yap retetber what that Inspection was
aSart1
A
Yeah, I have it right here if I nay refer to
it .
Lii, sure . And if y i con identify the date
of it .
A
This is an attacfnent to our work ptceeHlrg
letter Midi is dated Decater 14 frun Hirshaw
Galbertam who asked is to Look at the attached
prrdctiai by the state of Illinois rich included
irspectim reported photos by the inspector ad that is
what w raeived and were asked to look at . It's an
irsFectian that's dated October 20, 2004, ad it
irduded violations for faihre to take renedial action
viler
a ladfilt post-closve care, rmirtenate,
and
irspectian of the final ewer and vegetation, and it had
an ap,ing List of violations, which I'll refer to, that
irclirkd leachate rmnitorirg, grunci.eter
ninitorirg,
gas rnitorit8, and clean, post-clcaae are firaciaL
aswr t&
LINDA LANCE HEFLRTING
-- 847\55\W18
21
1
A
PrhaLy not, you kr
n+, it's
rot realty a
2 I part, a raessary integral part of the planning .
3 i
0
As fer
to working on h.f`
raL'f of t11e City f
4
hbrris for the Morns Cmmnity Lardfill, - at Mat-Fiiiht
5
did you hecme involved, rot riccmsariLy specifically
6 for this case but say retained by the city
of
Morris, to
7
do estinetes or too do any work at the Morris camLnity
8 1
LadfiLL?
9
A
My rest work at the "-is Cmmnity Ladfill
10
as it pertains to this case really coeurred in Decarher
of 2004
. 1 got a call fral, a joint call fran the Meytr
12
ad Mr
. Helsten that they had been notified of an
13
irsFectim that revealed care prablam at the landfill,
14
ML led ore ad waned to retain ne to help adi-ess or
15
instigate these problems 1 Shirk weld probably be a
16
better way to put it .
17
0
At the time was this, was Shaw Erwironmtal
18
the carpay at that tine?
19
A
Yes, I was with Shaw ErwiruTrentat ad
20
rpaeifically I got a latter ra fran Chuk Ralston data
21
Decarber 14, 21104 . I salt then a professional services
222
aareanatt right abort that tine, so it was in Decarkz,-
23
of 2004 that I was retained .
24
0
Nat specifically ware you retained to do?
.
LINDA LANCE
TING -- 847\8\6918
G
Can you
-- can we tae a look at this? I
don't wait to take a look at your letter lot
as far as
the inspection?
Mt
. IELSIEN : Let me see what the cover
letter says . The only thing -- wall, this are is --
here's rM di lame with kewire the co.'- letter ni
u,lese eerybo4y waives any claim that if I give )Ku
this letter I waive the attormy/cliett privilege .
MR . 4RANf : No, I'm asst arias about
Wo the inspector
was .
MS . rfY`O1 : Make copies of die report
m4`e
.
Mt . IELSTEM : As Mr . Moora's covet letter
sinply says the mayor is ra4 atirg that Mr . Mrese
initiate a stidy as to what matter -- Wat steps reed to
be take, bit I'll give Mr . Moat Lade the Letter .
Mi . WANT
: I neon this isn't really Neat
the deposition is that so se
don't
wait to
spend
too
mall time
on
It
. Clarissa, if you wart, I can fird a
rte/ of that ad sad it to you later on .
W . LNAYSN : Maybe we cal make a copy.
TIE .
ulTwSS ..
--we
can jl t . aeke . than here .
Ml . iIl lT : I don't reed to attach it as
a, F,diibit or aythirn .
LIMA LANCE REPIRTING -- 847\VSa18'
22

 
3
TPle rcpiet of then,
F5 . GZA'(SCN : That wtuld to great if you
dn't mind .
(Exhibit No . 5 was marked for
identification on 8-2-!15
.)
BY FR . IYrANT :
Q
I've got what's teen marked ae Edribit Ninber
5 . Is this the inspection report you're
.
talking aawt?
A
Yin .
0
And can You just generally dscribe what sort
of problems m that problems were disclosed by the
irn,ntim report
that
Yet+
were askod to be involved
with or to look into?
A
I has asked to take a took at the alleged
violations in the ir£{etial report, get Lip to speed ad
then ultimately I has asked to advise the city whether
there was any relevace or health and safety crrcorrw
attadred to these alleged violations . And the alleged
violation, I thick 1 meitiawd before, is failrre to
monitor gas, ester, and this was ardor the pat-ctosure
care category, 22 .17
.
And
than it had an attachment
LINDA LANCE REPORTING --
847\658\61318
nearly 35 feat in length
.
Q
share did you get the files frail
A
The ILlirois EPA . lk had same of the file;
already in-heat barase we had F0I'd, F-U-F, filed a
Freaktn of Infornetim Act rmq.rst sometime earlier for
another reason, ed we refi led that rdgast at sate
point, probably in December or January, December of 2004
or Jetery of 2015 . I dn't recall when.
Did yes meet with anybody from, any engineers
who were working for Camanity LadfiLl ramp
A I
personally
did rot . 1 sent rYprcseitstiv~
down there ad we may have rot them lot rot
pJrpcsefuLty . lk didn't schedule a rrretirg
wits, their
engineering fine
.
was their ewmering firm
Erwrira-neital
Engineering at that tine? Do yes recall?
A
I don't la-a+ if it wren lvdrsse .
The
irdividraL project madder is a ma, by
the ram of
McDermott . For ankle he was with Artiers ad the, at
some point he Left acid I dich't ksrw ecactly when he
Left, so .
Las Mr . McDermott the crc who you mat with or
repraehtatives of Shaw mat with?
A
I don't recall any of us meeting with him
.
LIWA LANCE REPORTING --
847\658\6918
27
3 ' 1kct :c-aJe-
ad it had to do with CaRarirg, cover
4
ri~aeriaL<, a_-sim gullies . It had to do with teatime
5
rmnitrv-irg, Srariowater monitoring, gas monitoring, and
6
firvriat acuraca .
7
0
l shirk ya said that you got the letter in
8
Decaiber of 2U74
. when did you
t or then did you
9
become retained by the city?
10
A
We
became retained in December of 2+704 .
11
0
That did yJ do after you became retained?
12
A
wb
had to get the file . lk had to get the
73
file in its complete package . We visited the site.
14
Cbeiasly, we met with the eagle at the site . We net
1s
with die city. The city was basically traare, in m/
16
opinion, of what was goirp at at the site . The
17
aerator, at lost the person cperstirg the site at that
18
tine, egged to jtat lack the resnrc~ to implement
19
aLt of the things and,
yw
iao+, to aided tp ultimately
20
chtainirg every 35 feet of historical record an the
21
site.
22
0
when you say 35 feet, do ytu Beat a 35
Z3
foot --
24
A
The files put in file foldtts institute
LINDA LAN RERRTING -- 847\66:8\6918
Lk may have net him just brief Ly bit we cedar net him in
the pa pose of obtaining
a lot of infonreticn that I
recall . I never did .
0 Did yes meet with
anybody
from tamLin &
Assodates?
A
I dcWt
rs>all rhcd- we did or rot . I did
rot .
0 Do you recall meeting with Richard
Schweirkert?
A
I
Imt the rare but I mar --
I don't recall
mrEtiry with him
fair
this prpse.
After you reviewed the file, what action did
yam take?
A wk eemtelly made the arcttsicn that in
certain instances the IEPA had valid cawerrs in the
area of
--
You're referrng to Exhibit 5?
A Yes . In the area of late monitoring, I
thick that they for the most part were right that the
Le4chate mo honing
was rot berg cord ted in
aaordarce with the permit . In the area of grolrrA.ater
ms..imrirwn, I a1r~EdTth the IS)A
IA that they ware in
fir.t rut d-.irg all the gra.rdrater monitoring that they
are rjired to do as well as the gas monitoring . In
LIWA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\65811918
'C,
FR-
UELSTEN
: kit, it - -, roh,Tont
.
It is
die thre°hold of his irnmLverrsx . The mayor was
5cl r erae y ~j u,,-r d wham he ss!.'
tine nrrrr- Do
Au want
2`
I
1
with shat 1 thick they referred to us ageirp violsticna
2 I
,kii,dh is in the tack of the report after the

 
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
the area of ercsicn control, Mat I saw and Mat we ear
alt there, there was sere work that reerhl to he done
Wt all in all it wasn't that critical
. It wa n't a
si niticalt issue anj r
of it paai cry real threat
to the pblic health In my feeling . And in the area of
firaciat eae&race, I thadit that the financial
essnasce estimate was ernpleteLy off bast.
Q
okay, let's
--
raw that it roctiat retort
that was p-cwided to ya, the 10-20-04 irrspscim
resort, did that have any, set any violatias for
financial assLru ?
A
It Said under page fear of the att
Roini rtneml IX, right rear the Deck i f y'a will,
se:c d to the Lest pv-- .
a
ch, okay. I've got it .
A
so, yes, it did,
a And jest goirg to that vtkr Rorelrvleral
IX, I see condition IX.1, Rarsn IM, I asstne that's aa
penait condition but I'm not sure
. It respires renewal
of eccass waste, revision of the cost estimate for the
reyv L of waste, and than in the text Lerrgralit it says
reerires respordmts to adJnst the cost estimates for
cLovAre, post-clerwae and corrective action . i s that
what ya're talking about i,han t'a're talking ahoy
LIMA LANCE REPORTING -- 847'458\6918
31
29
A
Just thrcteh my cork
on other LadfiIIs, rot
on this perticuler ladfill that I recall, ad I was
doing work fn and nut of Gtn* Cony . But w far
this particular issue, I Just didn't hae any
ranlLectirn of previous knowledge of the site and
specifically the firsciat asstrwce I can't raatt
.
Q
so, prior to 2004 you didn't know the wont
of firedial assurance that was respired?
A No . I moon if I did at Me tine, I chl't
rsaLL it . There are pbticatius that Sometimes you
can see It In different reports, bit I may have seen it
add rot re®lled it .
a
I aseum that when
you
-- %JIM
Yes
say yes
reviewed the file that yw revissi the permits, the
Sigmt(ptwretic) patents for the lax)fiLt?
A
Lhrhun.
Q
And the chore ad post-ciesuure tier
re}uiretmts that are contained in those permits?
A
yes .
a And Joan I talk about the permits, I'Ve got
than here if you welt to take a look at than, but it's
2000 -- I thirk it's 20110-155-LRI . As a matter of fact,
let me not ggs the permits I am talking alum tecare
these are the only ones really I thick nay be irrvolved
LIMA LANI REPORTINr -- P47\658\691 8
2
5
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
firsn_iat searace?
.A
Yet .
Q So, it ± ai't sp-iticslly mattion failure
to paid financial acstrat, tut really just talks
atrztt issue'=s that wild lo' related to firacial
assure,,,?
A
weLt, the last sentercx says no, tCplication
has been filed since the issiace . 19~ t'a're
correct in that kit titer the headlr® it says closue,
post-c(osure care and firerciat aerti-ace
.
0
sole . 19.asc this is a good time to get
into the estimates of fire-ciol essJ-e-re. I thick
)'O-J
testified or stated that t'a're famliar with the
fire-vial assurxce regii~disits, haw the y're gaeraterl,
hew they're coordinated with the Illinois EPA permits,
and that sort of thing . Prior to, say, 2004 were you
aware of the am.nt of finacial ass-irate regAred for
the Morris rarrhnity Landfill?
A
No .
Q And did you have ay femlierity with the
permitting process in the '90's wfiere the finerciat
asa.re, turners were generate!?
A
Yea.
And haw did
yes
low abaA that?
LINDA LANCE REPORTING --
847AE58\6918
with --
A
Are you talking ab3R the caret permitted
firs -vial aessrate?
Q
Yes
. Yeah, the two permits that I'll he
talking ab .A: are 2000-156-LFM -- let's sne-
A
I think these are it . I jet took the
Liberty to coq whet I believe are the permitted
prarature post-closure rare cost estimates for parcels A
ad B .
a Okay . And what I'll be talking tart is the
ae I just rrs,tiarad which Is pannt
minter,
just for
shorthad pirpcae I'LL ®LL it 156 is for Parcel B, and
permit No . 2000-155-LIM, which I'LL refer to w 155, for
Parcel A, or
maybe I'LL just say the permit for Parcel A
or Parcel B .
A
okay.
Q
But sires there's teen a molar of permits
there, this is the at that I'm referring to . AnI,
%W,
did yesj review the Two permits, the one for A ad the
are for B in 3104 char
you
were lcckirg at the file?
A
It p cbebly was in 2005 by the time 1
r vAwed it but yes
.
Q
And the clasue and pest-cLcare ra}Jireietts
that wars contained in the permits?
LIMA LANCE REPORTING --"847\658\6918

 
A
Ys .
a
And
then also the =-melt
of
f
weeded
rssurercu that ~ a:rteirfd
to the
Ls?
A
Yes .
Not gettirg hack to that you mid, you say it
Las ync cpinim at the tine that the accent of
firanciel a'awaP= Los
higher
that ro?ctd to be or --
A
Wkll, I thud,t that the eFp'vcdl that was
ua1 to develop the e-g,rcer's rest tstinate Las (a) ,f
ht was implemented, would rot r
sar,Ly ha protective
of pybLic health, safety ad ieltare ;
(n; us really rot
a p-ectiwt epp-mrh to the e,gircerinl <+,atlages at
the site, and in fact there were inch better ways to
e},rusdt sw ring the site the, were pogo ed ad
ultimately approved in t
se permits . And I thick ft
was really just a result of reqj[atjon Interpretation
that drove them
as cpposad to thing that was best for
that particular piece of gnrd
.
I wonder if
you ca, tell me What spocifically
you tha4rt maybe Las improper as far a I nee, the
arocnt of finaciat assuraces sligitty in excess of 17
million cbLLars for both Parcel A and Parcel 8 and
that's both clretue firucial assurare and post-closure
firan al ~ . What eta,
cs in that, if
yaii
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\658\6918
model . Please tell me that that is
.
A
The regulations spire that the a-uineer
damelcp a grvrthster imact asS 5llert, and that
grardater asse",eit is a computer model that is a
valwbte tool for an agireer . Too often titres the
tint.
i s
misused ad misinterpreted ad it la-tnes a little
bit of wag the dog- In this pariwLar arse I think
that .
happened
The model is meant to take the precise
tksign of the facility ad insert that design into the
precise hydrteeologic regime at that site ad mr dot the
behavior of the ladfilt ajar time
. We do that m carry
site , work on
ad we're modeling every day.
Ahat has
happened is sore people have
gotten, haw Lost sight of
it as a tool .
In this particular case, I don't think
the model --
let's go back to that the merletirg is, so,
that's realty what it's rremt to do
. In Portal A the
model failed which Beers the agircer or the operator's
egirm-
i uwble to get the merlon to pass, I dn't
Ire+ if that's reressari ly a component of his rear
,
his capability, or the natural e
.rdititrs .
I have rot
choked that-
Q
Wren
Yti
say
A
I'm rot go] rg to intercept you bet maybe you
LIMA LAND REPORTING
--
e47\4cS\691
9
35
mall, were you specifically disareeirg with?
A
VirtuaLLy every
Jam I'LL give you
a cr„pLe of example;s of rot only did I disagree, with the
atntity r:f
materlats that were estimated tutA the flat
work that
, .r
to be co doted . I'll Just give ynr a
cmple of examples
. The permit for cLosue rAcpred
that the o -i
filL in parcel, ad I here I pet this
riJ,t --
Q
It's Parcel s
.
A
Pacet B
mould nerd to be relocated and the
only space on this facility that had a{acity to a crept
Parcel B
.r-fill
Las in Panel A. Interestirgty
a-ci4i, the e ety reviewed the grardster
impact model
for Parcel B red it p>sad
. The agaey revnewed the
grard.eter impact mtx1al for Parcel
A and it failed .
so, they were askirg es to remove ewes fill, just
height rot area, from Parcel B in an area that passed
the model, pick it tp ad one it to Parcel A to an area
that doesn't pass the model . It would be completely
intuitivelsic .l to preteetion of the pbtic health,
safety, and welfare .
Q it --
A
Canter intuitive I should say .
• Yeah . Help ere cut with the grvudlater
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\656\6918
LINDA LANCE REPORTING- --'847\658\6918
can e>plain .
A
lien it pass, it shows generally that
you're rot impacting grardater within the zone of
attestation Lhich is 100 feet frame the waste at 100
years tine . That's what we insider passing, simply
par- The isac becomes if y¢Pre required to do Inputs
or a sensitivity aalysis that takes to more erp dais
than it argot to and those irpts no tenser represent
aythirg close to r®L world caditims .
Now let's go back to this particular site . In this
particular site the veers -- I'm sorry, the operator's
ergirwr was unable to get the model to pass
. Wry, I
dn't IenN . 1 did look at several input perimeters for
the mn&l, ad I da+'t hat ieve that the model in any
way
represents the conditions on
the grard cut theme .
Bcca ,5e he was cable to get it to pass, ad atthadr I
did rot participate in these negotiations with the
State, ay e,Terfat tells ma that they pretty
mrh just
±fautted or some people might say throe Lp their hands
ad said, welt, if you agree to, in this partloiLar
cae, pip the grcud.eter
ad treat the grmrdeter,
nit the Leadnte, aresrd the site for 100 years, we'll
give ytxr your Permit . so, there are a tot of
crpfa-dirg in cry belief ad meaty more thrud,out the
36 'n w

 
site, that we reed to talk about,
fee is just the =let
Does The nc&L rgres nt real
.ertd ctrditios cut et
the site? NC, I
don't telieie it r*i .
Is
It The'
Steire'C r,~,f.reitiLity to meet It for The ~reretor?
No . Ltry tfc operator those to m That tlry did, I
don't
6 I
ken+. I wasn't there .
7
Havirg said that, I've also read sore of the PCs
8
decisiris, ad the PM decisions seeitd to be fcased on
9
pnpirg teachers
. But if yw so all the way tack to the
10
mil and there this cams free, it's not acttelly
11 pooping leadiate
. It's piping grwzi.ster ad treating
12
grortisteu-that are the big ruibers in these clrsdre
13
oust estityptes .
14
0
Yw're talking alert --
15
A
I'll Hive you just ere e>ca,pLe of why the
16
,mdel is rot reflective of reality . The Brardeter
17
that flows uckr the nodal -- or I'm sorry, vide the
18
tadfilt is rep-esaited as at pattiwtar enter in the
19 permit
application.
That ore parareter I have
measured
20
in the Last year since ny .irtvolwrmit end that are
21
partiaAar ranker that I tas able to check is off by a
22
factor of forty
tiosard tiles .
II
0
Are yw talking atuut direction or wlure of
24
flan or --
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\t918
37
39.
9raxLaterw beta+ . it has to do -- one of the
rnrpoixrits that you look at is the footprint or the
ogisure to the grad beneath . And baase we're rot
Increasing the footprint as a result of that overfill, I
don't believe there is any mawsurnble difference in the
two- Ma-vver, odunim uses and
swim it is rot
without its issues also .
0
Do yaw recall when w started this way you
'en-?
talking abut the total wmrit of financial.
sssL r to at the earthLl ant why you thabit it n6y be
excessive, end the first ewraiple that you isd was the
overheight . Do yon recall what coipront of
the total
financial assurance
re- pireaert was? And if you can
just tell is what you are referring to .
A
Ian referring to what I beLieit is the
ourrent, rghenmittei prarattre vend pet-clostre rare st
estimates for Parcel A ad Parcel B, end I can't find it
right now .
Ml . LRANf : Do
you
Ltcw rhtrk?
WR
. IELSIEN : I krw how mrh It is
.
NR . GRAM
: I rb ton, I'm watering If
we tai save you sore time .
TIE WITNESS
: I can't find it,
W . [ROJ.T : It's X50,000 L thirk .
LINDA LANCE RFPCRTING -- t!4-A658\691
8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
A
Rate, sew rate irder the LotcflilL . So
--
You thick --
A
-- chacire ewe factor is aT irefprhfriate
Lay to Look at the math .
The attire M~dtl rot to Le
reevaluated if that were going to be
necessarily
p-otectin of the pblic h®lth, safety, ad welfare-
But I thick that at this point It's Just more of at
acaienic ~ise than solviro the reel rrblen .
Q
When you first remised the model, you were
talking shat tote relo®tial
. And I'm assumrg that
you thcs ,t the idea of waste relocation fran a place
there the mcdet was sggestel it wild be in crnpliarce
or could pass versus mrn'irg it to soreplaoe that
was
--
there it was .c.estiaheble ,m not a good idea . I assure
that's that you were talkirg
--
A
Welt, I don't think moving the taste in this
particular instance, knowing that I know now, I don't
think nu'irg the waste is goirg to protect the pblic
health, safety, and welfare. Remdxr that I said is
that fiat we are talking about here is an otertheiit
issue ad rot a Lateral spr sd beam we're rot
increasing the footprint of the LadfiLt as a resilt of
that overfill, if you wilt . Art rally that Landfill
footprint doesn't present ay inaeesed risk to the
LINDA LAMP REPORTING
-- 847\65816918
Mi . IELSIEN : It's arena 950, 950 to
W
.
GRANT
: led I
thick it was like $2 a
yard to prove it was pit in the pemut application .
M2- LELSIBI : if we're asking steteirsnte,
remltection free wy k'oulaabe in this case --
TIE WITLESS : I still can't find it .
AR- IEtSLEN : -- is that there was an
estinete of 300,000 pens cubic yert6 of merfitL and
there era a re,oraL, ed,uetim atd caravel mat fig"
of $2 per atic
yard
attached to that, sligrtty over
that, ergo,
you
rtes TV
with 9550,
1975,000 .
M1
. RANT : I thick the amtM of
override we're altars talked eb it is 475,000 obit
yards . That was in a permit app . from stale 1996 on, so
that's prt6ahty --
ML . IELSTEN : That tauld be the ninth
then .
BY MI . GRANT :
0 Let's just assure that It was 9950,000, So,
paint back to the total finacial aseraoe anent, if
yur opinion vus, for maiple,
the aerheidit did not
reed to be mNed or was a had is to 'rove it that that
would redre it by 9{50,0002
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
8474Y$fi918

 
it
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
m
21
22
23
24
e
9
10
11
12
13
14
iS
16
1
18
9
20
2
3
7
A
If
ya1 oaarL t+ot I
bP e•
Kith
the t.o L-cks
ctbic yard .
1'w JLet ic .e th atmin t1s test
ic'-t
yeah
at
CSrcz sites cc ire exam`"an'tr50 to
q
1
think at the tine e+ery&xiy ias asking
a n
z it, but I mink, 1 telieve it's true that
cverybdy, we jwt sort of settled m that ad that was
accepted even tharft mere ie, if I ra. 11, a di_P'te
as far as the
acb ~ of the 52 per obi r
. yard tc neat
it
. But I teLisve, I thick we osn pretty mod, agree
that the atrp--ovrt that was put into the financial
asssaxe total was 4950,000
.
haA
I rrcclL that
. I jret for sane: ream cir't
ve it in fruit of
or
M .
0
So if,
for exarple, if that was r-edrS, if
that has raroved form the total amrit of firaciel
ass+raee, it w.iLd
be scnethirm in slight excess of 16
miltim dollars?
A
It
yai were to eccvpt those mat °Sttrrates,
y .
Q
Sire . As far as -- let r ask you, what
other eleTe tts in that ant, in the financial assurance
arum th you believe are w*lg?
A
The grurdeter pop and treat systen for a
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\658\6918
be pnpcd ad treated as well
. If you're talking abut
treating
--
abet ooLlecting and putting a, effective
leadiate
collection
system, vmitorirg that
--
or not
nn,itorirg it but collecting leachate ad treating that
for a hot
years, how would that charge the eat as
cfpoeed to grecrd .eter antsict of the -- there wore
only -- let ne back cp a Little Lit
. when you're
talking abort grxarrlwater, you're talkirg atmA
grardeta-artside of the ladfill?
A
yes .
w
Okay.
How far a,tsicle of, say, tie*e waste
bxrKiary, the waste dispret boudary was the plan?
A
The deign is a little atrigus on that . I
n-r1 tell you fran haw I interpret what they're proposing
to do is to pop ad create a
cone
of 4pressim aroud
the laelfill so that grarxtater will always fla in MO
degrees tee rte the landfill, whirl,
nasally
valid
reglire you to be within that zcre,of attenstim within
a husk& feet or so of the LacifilL,
I
don't thick
that's a good ides at all
. I don't think it's -- you
krcww, I look at this us, I gates, and different than
sore of the decisions ad promedirw that I've road
. I
think the nut inpurta,t thing to d-, is take whatever
money is avai hole ad form w,c, that's vmethirg the
LINDA LANCE RETMING -- &7\658\691 8
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Iani-
d ,urns . I teen .hat the big cost rrtd I tkn't
_cork ,t frvtce. ay nz_, .r-f L
. irt,trctim, to'
1 : c
p. l
alth . I d nc Fee
tpL a resiL1nL eift,,t
of tl
. : wee- In Fr,L r. r crud: a creel fiat
russa.i
. so,, let's escna
--
srei I thirk I do have that
cast snivel in here . I saw it a nnrute Ex . $101,000 a
year or armrdirg to than 10 .1 million ctllars, I ran
think of prttebLy a
hundred thingr as I sit here that
vyld
be Letter to spend 10-1 million dollars on
than
parpirg the grurdeter at that site and treating it .
The grnrdeter is very poor gality grnrdeter now
.
It is in a heavily irdstrialized area
. It's scrrOrdd
by existirg permitted ladfills . it's got an area, an
old coal mired area that has historical dnpirg on it
since the 1940's . It's at test a Class IV greuxLater .
If the -- ti-, water that we're n
irg and nnnitorlrg
in ny opinion is rot Potable . There are no grardeter
users in the vicinity of the site . Other areas m the
site, if there is new deekpnent, can Er served by
nu,iciPal .eter which goes right ly the front of the
site . so, pnpirg ad treating poor gallty gnxrv eter
is a poor way to go.
O okay. Lkll, Let's talk tot treating
leachate
63
case the reguLatia-s re#re that Lead,ate
LTWA UJKI RPFO TNG -- &7\658'1118
cast wilt
decide,
bit let's take that money ad sped
it in the met efficient, jrecticable way that has the
Lest, biggest, largest positive in{act for the
crr'i,r.nun
. And as far as my diet\ is canerred this
is targayers' nvxy
.
0 okay . Let me jrat ask yw about the
spaifics . I uwiestard --
hopefully we' LI get into
that . Out a3 far as -- let na first ask yaw, when you
say a krdrsd feet eotsids the tadfill, do you men a
hudred feat outside the waste barthry'
A Again, I ckn't thick the edge, was real
specific acct that bit that's rmrtretly what I would
see .
C
Okay
. So, it could be within the actial
property of the Landfill Lit still be, hit outside of
the waste bardon,?
A
[tit you'lt also be irdeirg a flaw from the
landfill at the sere tine .
a
1 cndastad . Now is it uwmca to rilre
a ladfill owner to create a tore of attenuation so that
the lea--h
:_te dasn't have the possibility of flowing
A
Nn, but I don't think that's ccreiatvtt with
ekat we jwet talked a`a,I[. we're toLkirg mat apples
LINDA LANCE REPOTING -- 867\65B\CA18 -
art?
42

 
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
n1 area .
Q
I thca_g it -- that's whet I tin fr you were
ck-,c;rlhim ad I'll ask yal . wham I say it's rot
urorrcn, I net for ls41ste trestrwnc systes,
lag-term teachate treatment systems, isn't It grntralLy
preferred to have, to preveit a regatiw preaare so
that the leadiate wilt rot -- wiLL be flwirg irwerd
toward ; the L>3chate collection system as opxsed to
our ard?
A
Leachate collection system, remvirc the
Leachate frcm the LadfIIL and treating the leachate
safely ace it's remv red from the laclfiLL, is an
aR.rcpriate, safe thing to do but that's rot the saw as
treating grartieter award the perimeter of the .
landfill . And there's a significant
differace,
especially when you assure that a Prod cap is applied,
in the valve of leatd,ate treatleit
. floreo e , I thirk
the hoard got that wrong also . I thirk there is a
mistn±rstardirg of the facts m the grand of what is
beirg doe where ad by whom when it cares to teachate
treatment .
• The tesdwate treatnawt is really the largest
single portion of the, of the cLosrre cast, isn't that
titre, the 10.1 million I thiri7
LIMA LAKE
REPORTING -- 847\65816918
LIMA LANCE REPORTING_- 847\rl\6918
47
45
A
I agree
.
In general it'ss a regrirsrswt that ladfills
in both ctosre rd prat-closure rot impact the
grardater outsid- of the waste burdary ; is that
accurate?
A 0.msirle of the tame of attaratim
.
The zone of etteruatim .
A Lhich is a httdred feet from the waste
handhry in three dimensions.
so, what you're saying is the regulations
require that aside
of the zone ettetatim grardater
may not be inpacted and that's the purpose of the
leadwate trtntme,t?
A
Lkll, it's more than Jtst inpoot terse
everything we c impacts but Let's just say does not
materially degrade- You can impact it at a Level that's
so slow it's trnr~rabte tut you might still be
tednicatly inpactirg it
. But there are requirements
within the
regulations
that dertrstrate wbet .Lmel that,
for lack of a wetter term, irpsct is at lacd
. But you
have to meet that
paint at a hudre3 feet from the
Ladfi I I
.
0
If -- a q s~a' to collecting gnzrtieter
that is aitside of the tae of etteratim a far as
2
3
6
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
A
I f yaw here to irtptetrent the plan that's
permitted .
Yes .
A
It's gn--wrdchter-tretrrrnt at 10.1 million.
Okay
. And for a hutd-ad years, correct7
A
Yes .
I nW have asked this q.estim
but I don't
10-M
that he really get to it
.
As q :Qosed to pumping
ad treating teechute if it has done appropriately as
ggzsed to grotroketer outside the lattfill, and when I
say the ladfi ll Let's talk abort the waste tnndary, as
far as grnrdater outside the waste knrdory, as far as
pnpirq and treating the lead,ate -- and make we better
ckfire teams here . 1,haw I'm talking about Leadiste, I'm
talking tot water that's nn anon throtdi the watee
itself or close sea j to the waste itself that it's
inpacted by particulate matter or sane sort of dissolved
sr6staee that might be in the waste in
collecting
that,
is that pretty mach -- is that how you describe
leschete?
A
Yes
.
Q whereas, grvrrrteter world Joust
be
dvteer
is in either the shattw or the deep aquifer araJrd the
lardfiLL7
treating, collecting and treating the leadiate within
the zone of attenuation for a bidred yeas, do you haw
an
estimate of what that ®t would be?
A
Again, I thick we've got a mix-tp of terns
.
0
I thick we
do
.
A The leactwte that's within the Landfill
LIMA LUKE RStRTING -- 847\6581&18
cr>mr.
GrwtLeter is a m water whetimer it's in the
zone of attenuation, and strrandcd by son l particulate
a whether it's grus4eter that's oAsiS the tore of
attenuation ad still drrurdad by soil particulate .
he
area
of g'nrtleter within the Ixrbtd foot zone or
the zone of attenuation has the regulatory ability to
be -- have a higher level of impact than that
grotrd-ater
a=ide
of the one hudred foot sane . so, i
thick, I hope that helps with what my vderstadirg of
the different terms are .
Wit
-- right .
LJeter ad soil particulate within the tore of
attewatim Is rot teechate,
Q
Okay. Prd the plan that was sti'znitted that
you thiric was rut
--
A
ustel .
Q
-- a rut Wt I thagtt alt, in realer kcvrls,
the me that's referenced in the permit and has the
Q
A
LIMA LANCE RE'PCRTING -- -&7jb58W18
48
46

 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2D
z1
71,
23
24
flrtrraal asurace, rile T1,1 ri axca r. xvLmce, I
think you referred to it as a gram ater tretrent?
A
That's what
1t' .,
calsi
.
11~sL's rot that 1
refer to, that's That it's -aL'aj .
Q
Ckay . Based m yon rxkaat .riJirg of the
currently permttted fret-clcEi t a;re pL,n, hat could
it be treating! In other wont --
A
I'll Le hit with yw, the volui of
doanents that I
he,e
are Less than perfa-tly clear ad
consistent- But, e6ain, basal m lrrkirg at then ad
based m my own toper iere, it :{puss to me that the
1FPA said you cant get your nder to p=iss .
Ard this
he
-- I'm
speculating hare, you carrot get ytcir matt to
pass, so You can't get Your permit . If
You
wait to get
your periit with this particular dnsim the way you're
nmirg your partialar moot, we want you to treat,
pap and treat grnrd.ater and that njtd give the IEPA
the ability to say you're rot imps ..-tire gronketer
bend a hundred feet Wane- ynu're pnpirg the
grardster before m sartr
.here around that zee in
order to prevent that- Is that Clear?
Q
Yeah . Did You see a diagram of the plates of
There the wells would go, the cot tectim welts?
A
I dm't recall a comprehensive design . I
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847'1658\W18
poet-cLeetre care costs for Parcel A specifically .
0
Okay. And do you have an urk,standing of
chat groundwater as opposed to leachate is to be treated
crier the n -rest plan?
A
Mash, it's going to be irstallirg, and I'LL
try this again, it's -- Larhate is livid that's in
contact with waste . ace tea#ate is dbtssd or is
dalu33d by and enters grQwnJater, which is cater that's
within a particulate soil puss, it my he notsmireltel
or inµcvul grardater, hat I dr't think it's fair to
®lt that Leedhate arttirore . so, that zone that reeds to
be
--
Leachete reeds -- or, I'm sorry, grardeter
needs
to be withdrawn fran, I think in order to be
compliant
with the reguLatiors you weld have to pit those wells
in at a spacing, at a depth, ad at a distance five the
Latffi Ll at some point an that
you're
pultirg the
grordater tut of the soil matrix so that when you get
to a hLrdred foot away you can rhw there's no impact at
that point .
And --
A
Aid I don't kw pi misery wwt that is
.
But
ae of the things that we talked hat is
creatirg a regative prew,t or creatirg a zone- of
attenuation, in other words, so that there's ro chars
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\06918
51
49
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
3
1.
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
1
1
I
mi
;~t hehe smart a sketch or two tut irtdel.ate
rrei with
irchrfficimt data to really warrant cc,izvtrtion or
wn'',rcirrs Tram it .
Bs&
cc )na u .:
.~ statIirq of that plan, tine
ue that'ss arrantly permitted, how far off from the
tariff It is it cottertirg gro,rdatter7
A
I don't recall .
0
But you say that, and 1 area this is iiie
,
I'm cnfLscd,
a i
./hat you're sayirs is you're
saying that it rearired the mltectirn of grnrd .eter as
gpaed to lrachate7
A
Correct .
0
I stiLl don't think we've core to a alma,
uderstardirg of chat Liquid we're talking abort is
treated rrdor the arrant permitted plan wares
what
you're saying really is whet shored have been Looked at-
A
hell, tile arrant
permitted plan also
ircluies leadrate, ircluks teed ate std gra.ndater
.
0
Ow-
A
But the big 10.1
ml III an dollars Is
grnrdeter treaurant .
Q
But it's, they're all, they're both irclu6d
in the sate, the same figure?
A
They're both in the durettly permitted
L111)A LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\658\8318
or there's a limited chars that Lead,ate is going to be
migrating Out because the prascre from the well
. eysiam
is going to be pulling it irR -
A
That's the arrentty
nndtted well system I
assume
you're
referring to?
0 Yes, yefi
. Ard vw of the questions I asked
was is it utnmut for that to be a racpIrwatt of
LadfiIts?
A
Let's I guess stay with the State of Illinois
Mace I thick that was you-
desire previously- I
don't think there are many facilities that I'm aware of
in the State of Illirois
. None of the facilities that
I'm working m are doing that, maybe one or two- So, is
it a statihrd reredlaL tahiigee? Yeah
. Is it alma,
for cperatirg ladfiIts to erploy that? I dm't know
what the 52 operating ladtitta in the State of Ittiroie
that are doing it
. There might be a half a doze,, or
six, or eight, or tan. I don't krw .
Q
I don't how a tot of them myself tut I low
in cagrtss they do that .
A
UAI, there's a difference I think between
Copra-v . rugr®s is tying to create a raw more
grtdiatt facility
.
That's different . That's where
yan're trying to keep the leachate level Wow the
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\658\6918

 
20
21
22
2
a
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
a
23
24
23
24
2
3
4
5
6
7
arrardire Dro.rdia1 r fever, ad that's a very armor
t=cmiq-s and a very p t
a'i
:e--hniq.c
. A-d 7 thirk it
hts a similar, similar ihuics Btird it tut I thin:
ttert's a big diffe^e-ce L tests ptpiIR t-~hate Wt-
ad pulpits grc nd ter .
q
Cha other q.ostim. Are you a
. ere that at
Least in Panel A of the lndfill that that site was
pe-iasly trod for a mnicipal waste disposal?
A
I just asides it was but I don't really long
who used --
who utilized the facility
. Are you talkire
ebat what ostuiers wart there or was it --
(I
No, sink its actual use prior to, prior to
the p>ennittirr, the 2070 permitting prone
re
. I mean
to give ya my u demla-dire of it, it was -- would have
been closed down for quite a period of time bit it was
formally a nu,icipal solid waste LeddfiLl, in other
words, game, 7nnicipal
garbage
was di7p ad
.
A It's my uderstandirg that it's been used for
varies kitda of darpimg, including cluiping and burning
activities since the forties .
Q And do you knw aythirq about the liner that
nay have been in place for that dnpire, in other wrtt,
the dumping before 20007
A wall, it was an old ahrdwieA
coal
mire, coat
LIMA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\6918
55
at that paint .
0
than you say Liner, you mean what was pit at
the top for that cap or a liver? How would you define
that?
A
I thick it was really a liner
. It
was
orbital
.
Caneraety, it wild here been a
cop
for the
old Landfill . But it was cu9ectel clay and synthetic
liver over the old facility. Now sepetatirg the, if you
will, non-regulatory disposes waste from the regulatory
permitted waste
might
he ae way to refer to it as
.
Can
we
take a ick
qk break' Can you give us a
minute so that we mar talk to Chris a Little bit?
(A brief recess was take,
.)
By W . GNAW .
We' I L go back m . We were disasslrg the
leachate ad grardater issues ad that sort of stuff .
Do you have an estimate, have you estimatul or do you
have an
opinion a, whet the coat would he, the
third-
party cost, for treating leachate at the Laelfill
for a huidrnl years?
No
.
0
what the cost
Do
wild
you have
be to
an
treat
estimatcLeadwate
or fzncLtsiai
for 30 years?as
to
A
That I thick I do have, For leachate
LIMA LANCE RWRTING 847\658\18
53
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
L5
2
3
4
5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
mired it since, since abaxtememt of the crel
. There's
an udarcLay layer that lias vrk~ the coal . W, see
that in virtLelly all coal tearirg zmcs . So,
that
rnkrclay that uterliec the coat has re eccrcmic vaLra,
ad that udeiclay is a fairly inperneebLe unit . What
we see in this area ad what we saw also un3 at
Streeter rot far frun here is that . utl-,uLay was Left in
place because it don't have any economic vaLta and
that the coal mine subsequent to extraction of the
minerals backfilled with water, became same kind of
local padfgarry . And irked cry art interviews with
Loral pile confirm that in fact it did have water in
it at ore tine . They ptnped the water cut ad they
started placing garbage of nuiicipl solid waste . It
was bind occasionally . None of that suprisas me
.
So, I debt and I'm cotfidentthat there was no
--
let me rephrase . I would be awful suyrised if there
was any competed clay liver, marmot eginsei-S type
liner uter it
. My belief is it's probably urdartain by
the uderclay of the coal which is, there at the
empirical evidence ad the borirg data that
we have
apport this . And at some, point in the 'BO's a Liner
was constructed amcr that previasty filled area and
matt to, I guess, male acre type of an aginaered lirr
management which ircluJas operations and treutment g
E809,4tb .
And for what period of time is that?
A
That's for 30 years .
So, that's
treating
all leetate facility --
A
Monitoring the tead,ate and there'S sole
other associated activities with that-
And in caning Cp
with that estimate who did
you
nee as the treatment facility?
A
city of Morris, PIBW.
Are you aware that the city --
abo.t
the
reyaletiars reepirtie,t for a third party, for the cyst
for a third party to treat the leadiate, in other words,
not an owner or an operator? I lam I am saying that
poorly, but rot srmeore directly involved with the
Landfill .
IR . MELSTEN
: object to the form of the
grestran, the assumption. It assures facts not in
evidence . With that, Mr . Mouse, I've node my objeeticn
.
You may aseer .
THE WITNESS ; I thick part of the rigid
interpretatia-e of 1fte - ri latias of this is
probably
what got is to this point to begin with . We hays a
sanitary tine that's in the pblic
right
of way
outside
LIMA LANCE . REPORTING
-- 847\658\6918

 
LIMA LANCE RBHRTD a -- 847\658\6918
LImA .LANCE REPORTING . FL7\658\6918 .
fur L=-#hate treabrent, haw tech did
ycu or What cost
did yon LC,I,
Pat huge did you cse for the City of
'iiilit -,L :I.,6L t" E.J18t1?
A
~Lk canon, t chit
Weu if Itw ztAt with nc
i.a~ . sorry, I
should
spa k Ip . I shirk it's .CE,
wits per yatLcn Which is the a,traeted
-- What 1 wed
is the contracted rate that they were going to charge
ac if they exc
their arrant . so, I got that arc
of their otritract for eperatia-a to CLC
.
Q
Did you ice that for the entire volute
of
Leadhate?
A
Yes,
a
so, you didn't give then credit for any
pretreatnsrit?
A
Mo .
Q
You hate -- do yul hat any krrwLaz~p abet
What other ladfILis pay far teachete treatment charges?
A
FeeratlyL
Q
Arid in general tents how dies, ha dies that
.r85 per gallon carpare?
A
It's probably less than they rharye private
actor operators but it's probably
wry
close to What
their actual cents are .
a
Do yM
know What the City of Morrle drams
LIMA LANCE . REPRTING --
84758\6918
Q
AM What is
ar'
estineted curt
of closing
the landfill?
A
I hah't CIA ft- broke, it dsri that
Way . I
had it realty broke, into far different tasks,
a
I'm goirg to get Into the details
on the
rake them lve, so-
A
Mist do you Wait by dowse?
Q
M estimate of the cost of closire the
lacifitts in arfor eme with their permit and let are
muddify that a little bit
.
A
C&vy.
Q
Berg-o
we've already sort of identified that
there's same, issues with waste relocation, bon ewe unirg
ro Waste relocation ftaa Parcel
a to Parcel A, the ~t
of per-forming the dosune tasks that am called for in
the two psrtsits-
A
No. I tha4it they Ware cmplotoly
ir3racticabte and crprotective of the pablic health
.
a
The clean costs therseLv®7
A
Yehil, the Whole t1prneCh
.
Q
Nee yw care ~p with an ettenetive planar
an alten'i tive ckmare plan, in other word,
rat
rrcrssarily What's in the permit, and haw you care lp
with the. cats for that plan?
. LINDA - LANCE REPORTING --
&7\658\6918
of cur
fe
rtL ity that's u-ryitly sn^epNr
. Lrchate frail
1
tttF: tamli'y . Purl to ssrlffute tilt s=;t
1• . r areintrg
other hri that seals cmpletaLy 1LLc9i-t( not only
tusz w it mLd l'» Wxd for t e -niirvrra ;t tut 't Would
take, t eoretically if
we
wire 9oirg m ixt:t tirerc ;ML
5
6 mar e, m,~f frun puttirg it into the grw'd end
6
7 giving it to sale kind of financial Trstitution . So,
7
8 aLthn,, the renllatic s do speak to that, I thick there
a
is -- I thirk there's a capability for the
to
9
10
interpet those differently.
10
a
Are you a.ere
that the Ford has already
11
12
ruled m the issue of Whether a third
party
treatre rat
12
13
estimate is reiuired?
13
14
M . :
HE-MIEN Also I'll objrct . I thick
1G
15 it aants
facts not in evidence. but with that you may
15
16 answer, if you krm, Mr
. Mmsz.
16
17
THE WITNESS : I have the board decisim
17
18
of Fetrtary 16th, Is that the one you're referring to?
18
19
BY M . GRANT :
19
20
Q
Of this year-7
20
21
A
Yes .
21
22
Q
No, it was a 2001 decision .
22
23
A
Ch . No, I'm rot awere of thet-
23
a
in caning Ip with ynrr estimate of 8909,0
24
59
1
private sectu •
operators for leachate t
t?
1
2A
I don't recall as I it here,
2
3Q
Did you take
aa look at that rLaber? Did yw
3
4 review that ruder'?
4
5A
I've Locked . I trey have . I don't recall it
5
6 a I sit here . My aW, wgsrierb is it
c8, be wy-here
6
7 frail as la as a parry and a half per gallon to
-- or
7
8
less to, I've stoup to fist to six cents a galled .
a
9
a
Okay
. And
drat
so I have this written cbwn
9
10
right, you said --
I have . .086 per gatlai. Is that
10
11
11
12
A
Let are fired it .
12
13
a
In other words --
13
14
L® than a pary a gattan .
15
0 Okay. Did you -- just so that I In erstad
15
16
it, you did rot cam LP with an estimate hsed on a
16
17
third-party
cost, in other worc's, for Rumb dy else
17
18 hides the City of Morris to tryst it?
18
19
A
No, it sews rot practical or ioprxticable
19
20 to one. It also
seemed
like
--
20
21
a
It woes realty jrst a yes or ro. Y-re yew
21
22
able or have you are hp with an estinetei cwt of
22
23 closing Parcel A and B of the
ladfill?
23
24
A
I' a rate cp with ray own estimate, yes
.
24

 
23
24
6
7
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
A
Yes .
0
that's y,.i- astinata! :usc of cLosird parcels
A ad B?
A
Total c¢t is rfft arcr .rd 1C' ti lion
dot L are .
Q
okay
. That's rot pat-cteure7
A
IrtLLdirg Post-clrs e,
a
okay
. Taking rut the post-chaos aap~,
post-clmse care aspact of it?
A
Be about 8 .4 million .
Q
Ard I'm going to as um
that the pest-ctowre
Is the boleros of that . So, what
do
y°1
calculate as
far as Post-ctosure care?
A
Ragity2 .6million .
AM the imt-clostre care, was that done
from
-- on a third party
bas-is?
A
Yes.
Mi
. FELSTEN
: 2 .6
on 1 .6 Mr
.
Moose?
I'm
doing the math .
THE WITNESS : 2.6
. So, I ant have bear
off b; -- it mat be 7.4,
BY NR . (RANT :
Okay, abort 7.4- So, the total closure,
post-closure you believe to lee about a,p-aeiiiately 10
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847yt68\6918
nn-Py they mild afford to spad2
A
No .
0 As far as the Post-clOSUe care, then tat's
assure 2-6 minim dollars of post-closure care, have
you disossed that separately with then, in other words,
can the city of Morris afford to put
W
2-6 million
dollars of -- to tevmse past-closure?
A
No, I did not discuss it sgparately With
than.
Yw're familiar with the regilatio s
. Can
yw felt hen how with, with the arre,t firmcial
assurance that's in the permit of 17 PLUS million
dollars, if you armed to, as you obyiatly think that's
ircorrect, how told
you
ctra- a the re}rired abort of
financial assurance'
A
I would ioptera,t a Plan that fowled m
instead of financial essrate a series of tasks that go
to the --
Before you --
no, I udtxsta d . Before We
get into that, ad I'm sure we Will, I
rm+r, yci'LL agree
that currantLy the permits for the tadfill rxgr-e at
least 17 million dollars of --
A
I agree
.
-- clostae, post-clostre financial acsirato?
LINDA LAME REPORTING -- 847\65HW15
63
61
3
4'
5
6
S
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1
2
miltim dollars?
A
Corrcrt,
Vid of mat 2 .6 minion is post-don.re
care'
cW ncX, .
Ok5y . You're
gong
to --
I'm goirg to --
we'rs going to give you the opportunity to discie s
sat
of the things and 14a-It to Ii-ow
spout what you thick
rtesR to he die. I thirk that vas in
yo-r
disdc s-e
as far as the tasks that reed to be done at the
Landfill . But at this point tat ma just ask you about
financing the total of the 10 miLlim dollars, the 7.4
and 2 .6 million dollars. Your client is the City of
Morris . Have you diseased the varioe tasks ad
especially the arrant of norey that's required to d,
these tasks?
A
Yes .
Does the City -- ca, the City of Morris
afford to d' closure at a,
say, 7.4 million dollars and
2 .6 million -- Wit, the two, the pnst-clasure cam, we
can talk, sell talk about that separately, But as far
as doing closure at 7.4 million dollars, can the City of
Morris afford to do that?
A
They tat l me ro .
Did they give you an idea about how mch
LINDA LANCE REP(RTINO
-- 847\E68YE918
If yet disaoreed with that mbar and you waited to
legally, in other words, in
catfmimee with the
reguiatias in the Act, how do you dtaee that robe to
a enter that you think Is --
A
File a significant modification to the permit
ad try and chase that r rter-
Has the city filed a sig ifica t mcdificatim
permit application?
A
Yes .
And when was that filed?
A
Arard Haveater of 2005 .
And ca, you telI ma the current staffs of
that?
A
Currently we hew a denial Letter from the
Agency on it for some numerous issues,
0
Denial
. Letters Lip
front are clue in a
permit wplicatim, aren't they?
A
Yrs .
Did it re .cast m'dificatiors to it?
A
You
krw, we itst got the letter this Weak
.
I haven't had a chair to met ly dip into it
. Ag1in,
that's not utstel
. Tbete's a denial Letter in the
inte,feetive process with the Agesy is devekyxd to
resolve the ottstaidirtl 1ssLss .
LINDA LAND REPORTING -- 847\658\ 6/918

 
23
24
1
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
9
20
21
22
0
Did
y.xj
'in Yaw permit .-nliatI :0 sQcrntt a .
remrnsrkd enter for fiiviciol r ;a'sue?
A
Y- .
0
N'd'.a, that the 10 milIicr, a)tltt-n.p/Yr
that you --
A
For Parcel A I'm at 5.7.
Q
AAd as you're gsirg thr ph those if you t~
split cut tie ctntE ad prat-clrrure that wand be
great .
A
Parcel A I'm at closure at 2 mf hion and
post-chosure at 3 .7 . And Parcet B I'm at closure of 5-1
ad pet-clcsure at 1
.4
. That Fits the teml of the ttm
at around 10- This is rot the ease as the 10 million
1
referred to eartier .
Q
And why isn't it the sale rurber?
A
3e.se an this pattiailar rOmber we were
bard by the
n.±1
aril a few other things, hut the scope
of work for this pertinltar one is more wgr ant I
thick with the reg.Aaticrs and rot as protective as what
I'LL call ar practical alt roach .
Q
As far as -- jet Let me ask the gestlmr, as
far as being p-oteetfve of the ewlrenrant, Isn't It
really the resposlbiLity of the ILLirots EPA?
A
It's also the rasprrtsibiLity of ery
LIMA LANCE REMETLNG -- 847\558\6918
A
Morris is a -- all permits are cisaiad
Stwem the cprator ad the owner . It's interestirg
that the permits eFeifioalty Lists the ever serrate
then the operator a opposed to fist reµlirirr3 the
tier . I read the PC3 bsision that indicated that
Morris awes an
operator and I thick that there's sate
material fact that they've misinterpreted, ad I thick
they're giite wrong in their intetpatatia,,
respectful
0
ly
speaking.
No, i u r-stand . But -- I mean the single
answer is that the permit has a rurher of conditions
which bird tic- City of Morris ; isn't that correct?
A
Well, you know, that's a LFyal grtttion. I
shirk it birds the gxrator athor qt atcr as I read
the re,itatias . It da?rn't say operator arid owner . It
LIMA LAMBE REPJ TLNG -- 847\658\6918
67
2
Illinois . l"rva's ar flier
rtsnxtsibitity .
3
r7
Bit its ols: the resixrafbiliy of both
4
L:rcffi Il d,
4 d egirters to artform with the
5
rcc,7u',atiss in the Envinrmntel Pr-ota-timt Act
; isn't
6
that true?
7
A
well, certainly
--
8
ME- HELSTEN
: Objection. it's
9
argjnantative
and
I object to the form . Ya mry artwar
10
Mr. Mocoe.
11
THE WITNESS : I thick, you know, it's
12
certainly 9n a incer's rasynsibility. As far a
13
whether it's latifftt owners or operators is anther
14
issiie
. I thirk that dav-d+ u who's responsible for
15
what .
16
BY Mt . QtANT :
17
0
The I.adfill
operator
does rot have the
18
dnoice of picking ad dnasirg what reaalatias it car
19
canfonm with ; isn't that toe?
20
A
A Iacff1LL gerator I agree .
21
a
And 1
neat it's a b-eiras and if you're
22
w-irg to be in the Ladfi I I heiress ya ha'e to follow
23
the rules?
24
A
If you're a Landfill operator,
yw hone to
.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
Pe5ietend
Pr,7l~acn~l hwreer in the state at
sop gereter or aer
as I recall the regalatias . So,
I thirk it really has to do with who's repcrsible for
what . The aspects of operation in cry mind are of rty
the re.
.cmsfbi11ty of the operator, and what
retpnrsibiIities the arer has I thick is, if you have
an Perator is -- if they're
differ.. parties, I thick
is rot raessarily the sate .
0
But if the permit has a reepirere-it that
specifically says the cover or operator or the
corner or
the pennittee, wouldn't that bird the ever of the
ladfi lL as well?
A
If a turtract is sps.ifirstty
executed that
deLcata alt of that rvpoesibiLity
, to another entity,
I think it goes to that entity, ether ise, the arieracts
are of rn valie .
Q
Is it ynr belief that a pecan cai contract
away
their, with a private party, their permitted
rbligatim udar an Illinois EPA isste term pens t?
You g c; can sit, Let's po outside .
(A short Veak was takal.)
(Dhibit He's . 2 ad 3 were nurkel
LIMA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
b
A
I c n't km:. I thick that's a legal
gesstim .
M .
(R49:
Cen you a give ton a minute?
fol
o,., the rube, that's correct .
0
Or if you're a permitted Ladfill arer as
wells
A
You know, Let's take the case in front of m .
I thirk clearly Morris contracted that responsibility to
anther parry and then I chink it's a, issle of the law
verse egineerirg .
0
But Morris has a permit that's issd to ft
as owner of the Lartiff I I,

 
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2L
1
2
6
7
for xkntificatim on h-2-)s .)
3Y PV .
rRJIT
:
o
Lt's get bo<k on, I'd like to nut in a
nrla of E*hlblts . Let's got thcs o.m or the w:rw .
haw_ not Eciibits 2 one 3 which are spies of
interrogatory sprees from the
City of Mrrie .
Looking at Ediibit Number Z Jiidt are interrogatory
responses from
-- I'm sorry, I rums Nurber 3 . 1 halt
the applersttaL ones which are interrogatory rcs{xscs,
&.pterentaL Mowers to staters interrogatories
sbmitted an May 18, 2006 . It says in disclosure
"lnterrogstory No . 3. Mr. Noose may also testify as to
closure/part closure ative he proposes to be
inple anted going forward
." Do you see that?
A
Yes
.
tae you developed an opinion about what
closure end pest-closure actions ehwld be done at the
Morris Community Landfill?
A
Yes .
Let's talk abut this . Essentially before
getting into a lot of detalI about it, if you could, is
there a way to split the tasks out into separate things,
meyte we can talk about them separately, in other words,
leadwate is ore?
_ LIMA LANCE REPORTING ._ . 847\658\6918
wait . We neasred the depth . We baited to maim sue
that it was still t.rctiarrg . We coated that depth
to escistirg geologic and hydrogmtogie data to realty
assure arseLves that if wan did obtain samples from
these wells that the wells wild be
-- yield valid
results or to the degree we were able to arsine
apreeivtes that they were
. That report was given to the
city in July of 2006 and
since 4pocimately that time
the city has grafted w Wmissim to go in there and
monitor those wells. Lt's important for me to
uderstard the impacts from the facility, which the
monitoring wells
measure,
in order to asSaSS that
potential threot.
Q
Lett me just for identification, is that the
document that's titled Landfill Monitoring system
Evraluatim Report dated et the bottom July 2005?
A
Yes .
And a cop,' of this has been presented to all
parties today.,
A
Yes
. And since that time we've
been
naii tarlrg the lardfi Ll and now we've had far 4nrters
of
rcwn data, arid prior to that I thick our Lest data
was in 2000 or 2001 so there is a significant data gap .
is that fair due by stave Eitii,ulesrtal?
LItZA LANCE REPORTING -- 8b7\655\6918
1
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
9
10
11
12
1
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
A
Yec
.
0
bhst genoraL twes of donna end
post-d.ceure
a tivitie: do you think reel
to he cone at
the Morris Cammnity Lrdfitl?
A
Well, as I indicated to the City of Morris,
first we reed to assess whether there's m imrsdiate
threat to the pbtic health, safety, and welfare
. Ard
mead an my visual impaction of the site ad r®nd
review, I recamrrt d to the city of Morris a series of
actions that be initiated as soon as pasible to batter
ascertain whether there is any potential public
health
threat . Those resulted in Morris retaining wa to
produce the three &cuuorts that I p-cdeed for you
earlier
.
The first was completed in July of 21XI5
. The State
alleged that monitoring of the landfill was rot
occurring in accordance with the permit, and after close
evaluation
of the facility not only was the monitoring
rot being empleted in xmrdate with the permit,
really the sanctity or the woe-Miners of the monitoring
system was in yas tion byte . And I asked for
permission and received pennissim by the city of Morris
to go rut and evaluate the monitoring system
. We looked
et each monitoring well, Located it . wan prgad the
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6718
A
Yes .
And as for as the monitoring pa
.ec
e, e, am
those the same parameters that are t -itaireed in the
Landfill. permits?
A Yes . The seco-d thing I
wanted
to da is
evatwte the prate of the Leadmate in the landfill
and the effe tivamcss of the collection system . That
report was -- that r .est • eEpro.cd by
the
City of
Morris ad that report
was praised in September of
2005 . And it evaluates from a Leedmte cotlectic
standpoint what has atully been constructed and hw it
functions and its functionality versa what was
pemdtted
. And that was itprtant for me to trderstad
the ability to Withdraw t tmete, how it was being
tearhed - .
handled at the site .
Can you describe generally the w®chate
collection
system at Parcel A and parcel B tease 1
Los w that B was operated as a mnieipat solid waste
landfill fm a lag time and it was an older LardflUM
so, if you could jut give is an idea of ae panel
verse the other.
A
Parcel A -- well, let me kind of start with
an omraLl statarult . Laxhate collection
at the
facility, both percats, dxsn't ietlynrrr today's
LIMA LAME REPORTING -- 847\eb8\FA1B

 
24
3
eFrswt cT retirg st:rci,rcs . Aacl tt'at i, p rmitted
amen hat !as dn;t-,.red ut, is a dtspsrity End
dra:e's
a trek of cctr,diers^vc
diagrams for is
to there all -'rec,saly -tat
cr1zrxte6 n-,
Pavirg said that, we did go, a- it'> cpl.aired
in
detail in the rep.-t what wo, did, to try erd idntify
what was ccretnct!~ . IFder~.tdnlirp
that sore of the
stuff is still trdergrard ad sore of the eviderrre wits
based at less than total artpr~d!aeive ore rvtadirg we
did
Mix-
air test aes of what wes ecttetly
ccrctrtitod
. So, between Mhat cur epinim is, ad this
is set forth in the scorn, and whet ecttstty might be
there, there's p-cbebLy wFirg to to see divergence,
Right rnw the leadiate caltectim system at Parcel
A is restly pspirg taai±ate cut of seeral vertical
matioles and putting it into the gas extractien
maifot± to a centre( point Mere a simple cattrector's
pip is used to pup the teachate into a mnicipsily
erred sanit ary
tire out front .
Md Parcel B, its --
and there's paragraphs ad so
forth within this report . Parcel
B they had care
vertical extraction points ad it has en vvertirer
and
Mrineter mLlestim system am" three sib or maykr
Two ad a half sides that ors to to constructed and
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
A
I didn't understand the 4restim.
Q ire as of the aptiae that you looked at in
evaluating
the problems out there erntinuirg to operate
Parcel A, Which I think has retaining waste to full
capacity?
A
By CLC?
Q By a-6 4' . Did yo.I lock at as are of yw
optics cvntiruirg to dispose of waste at Parcel A? I
don't treat today or tamrrw bit as an option --
75
'I I-
it qeta irtrerreitally ircreasS over tint
. You know,
2
wither' tettirg into rm-e chtaiL, I thirk that's
yJ ashy it .
Q
•yeah, I
Lsn't wcoking far &tail, I was font
5
urice>
.dunk the is:;tes fran toe to the other,
A
The third thing I aakaf to do is in order to
;zi''sc_s
the pbLlr health iasces is to look at the
IardfIIt
ass,
system
.
That
resort
was put together ad
:L-knitted
in ltoril 2045
on Parcat B- Peril B is the
west side facility. Based m nr wire that w had
at the site, I didn't thick la-dfilL gas was mach of a
mrtmrn m the east side or Parcel A
. So, we really
looked at a caple of imrsdlate thires
. First, we
c6tairtad the information as ghiddy as possible
and
raped dap m
the site . second,
we received -- we
rccanrerc*--d and ultimately rr8ived apprcval from the
city to foes on the pbtic health, safety and welfare
in the area of
monitorirg, which is a critical factor to
krtrw, lrachate coltettion and gases atleetlan leas
.
From there we
thaw cle~elged a recammt4atian of chat we
would cb to chose the facility in the most prodxtive,
i .e.,
least cost, highest irgact Ilea,
Q Did
you investigate cattlrulrg to gpaete the
facility' In other words
--
LIMA LMtZ RFFCRTING -- %7\65816918
assessing
the imradiate threat
. Did you take a lock
at --
A
Yes
Q
--
what wild be raj ind?
A
L ckveLaned a closure
approach
that felt
Into five categories . R,e was the grurd.ate
monitoring
retire. We wanted to cb work m the
grardater monitoring network to make ft sore
miprhesive and more reliable
. We had re=mvtatlas
trdar leschate meagawatt and monitoring --
let me lack
tp
. {,fiat we call grurd,ater monitoring retweric were
tasks in the 100 series and all tasks mrectsi to that
we had sob 100 nnters
. Series 200 ruts wets
teadrate raegereit end mnitorirg
. Series 300 were
first rower system and first lad form
. Series 400 were
Lardfi ll gas and nonitoring, and series 500 were
pest-closure care activities for 30 years
.
Q
And these were recamatbtiaa that
-- I'm
sorry, were these recametbtias that
yw
had care to
mrL,aio s of 6f at rwaid to be dcre with all these
wh<xe you AevtIopicd a plat to deal with dhese?
A
Yeah, these are my reccme z6tias at least
initially of that reeds to be implenaited at the site
recognizing whet you enter a project Like this there's
LIMA LANCE REARTING
-- 847\658\6918
76
?q
A
felt, there was wlure available bat I dich't
10
evaluate se, al thing I thick that are all part of
11
that q.estim . I didn't
evaluate
whether we had the
12
centrectwl capabfllty to cb that . I didn't pvaLiate
13
Who mutt be best to do that, . ad I didn't evatmte
14
precisely What the cost/benofit ratio of that might be
15
over time, if that
answers
yaw r}-tie.
16
Q
Sure . So, tasicstty all of the rcrthsiao
17
that yea have ire tamed m ctarsirg the facility as
18
opposed to etttiruim to operate it7
19
A
I assured closing the facility.
2D
Q
Ckay . Did ytan -- how anon in ctcnirg the
21
facility, hew but the statbrd dive tasks of
22
prttirg in a final co er ad ghtdir'g and those sorts of
25
thir'gs? We've talked reef[ lactate and
gas
in sort of
24
LIMA LANCE REPLRTING
--
f4716
T,9~691B

 
10
11
12
13
14
5
16
17
1s
19
20
21
22
23
1
2
3
5
6
7
e
johns to he ch_srga end au-priaoe pxr ebLy etvg the
w~ .
0
Before yoJ telkad alert clcccre costs, 7
.4
mi ;li xh cbU aro . I thick hat's ace&- ts, isnt - it,
yew estimate of cL use osts9
A
Yea .
Q
And also
recognizing
I think your two ruTbers
were -- one was, ani I asked you What yar estirrmte of
the cost of closure, it was 7.4 million dollars, ad I
thick also you
-- What I've got written down is that in
yar permit application that you swnitted to the
Illinois EPA you had clasre costs of 2
million
for
Par l A ad for Parcel B 5 .1 miltio-r . But I mean
lasicatly with the conclusion, your caclusias that you
reached on what roeds to be doe in those five arms, is
that where yes care tq with the 7.4
million
dollar ast
estimate,
A
Yes .
Q
So, a crnpLetim of these five tasks yaw
estimate tea 7 .4 miLtiori
A .
You re correct.
a
Right .
A
No, I'm sorry . No, it was five tasks go to
gist moor 10 million became it irctulas task five which
LINDA LANCE RS--
T1NG
B47\659\6918
77
my opinion. so, we have alxut $28,000 worth of work for
monitoring welt installation .
a
And that's just clear", that's rot
post-ctoa. e?
A
That's closure.
0
Yeah
.
A I mean it's important for es to cartirnslly
monitor the grardeter for rs to crake sue that as
assunptlas m pblic health, safety are always
insistent . We have epptacineteLy 515,000 for
grandnter wait aLaJrrrent-
sub hawk wells that are
darsged that mild be a potential pathway. We went to
abandon those waits ad seal them sup ad do the
appropriate permitting with the IEPA to do that
.
There are repairs that are reed3l to existing
welts, wells that can be tr uight back to life with some,
minor wont with chest a thasad cbllars for the
repairs .
And we want to establish a grardeter ne-ege rot
zone
arard the ladfi ll yams the current no
graundater attenuation area . In this particular area,
rorncne it's an old tnrdsea3
cool mine, that Lt's got a
Lay history of dfrpirg that in certain carstituants the
4p-9radieht pa,d,rlers or castih+rtte eu-eed the
3
5
6
7
B
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
1
9
20
21
z2
23
2
s pcst-etaare .
Q
okay . That's fin-y,
I didn't write chat ae
chin . Ckay. 4e l, arc thrayi far is 7
.4
million?
A
Correct, arii chin
e .
--
Q
Did yc0 -- in caning w with these
recaaroxivtipa did you attarpt to make are that ycu
were complying with the cxistirg permit ree
.rirar nts?
A
No.
mach
0
as the
I'm
listed
rot talking
ctASde
shout
rapuirmmts
financial
.
~ so
A Yeah . I thick that's what we atteiptal to do
in the permit application that's arrentLy
pending.
For
exarple, jest to select one thing in part, the arrest
application that's pending, it irehds waste
retoraticn . I dn't believe that is a wise attaar .
That's not irtluied in we'll call it the alternative
closure plan .
0
As far as the grrt deter monitoring network,
what sort of work would have to be doe to --
A
Got it broken out in five general cateqpories .
We have to ere x d the grurdtter monitoring network,
incresa the nxbzr of nonitortng wells . Sore of the
rrmitcrirg wells that we ford were dam, uLsdole .
we have an irsufftctant arartt of
tp'9radin
wells in
chore gradient
t"ra5r
we have a lard tune that's in and
card a facility of highly irslstrial, because we're
not sire the grartiater and because the qnrdwatw is
rot potable aywey, this is I thick a perfect
application for uti Lizatim of a grardrecer mareferont
facility. And than we've got orgoirg grarhdeter
monitoring drirg the period of closure . So, that
graz inter monitoring work is right stout $6Q,000 . The
task two work
--
0
Let me jest -- as we go thrall these I'd
Lilac to get an estimate alma how lag you wa iLd think
you would estimate it world take to complete these tabs
too
. I don't krcw
if this is maybe the right ae to ask
A
I thiric probably we have a sdredile of
iipLerettatim tut you
wouldn't
re easarily do ell the
grv.r¢etar
monitoring and then rb the next . It's all
done at different times
.
0
Right
.
A so, we ham: a year to yew sdfec4le of what
we would do each year and hat thee costs would be far
each year. For zvarple, you would went to -- well,
let's get into the next
re . Task 200
level is teachate
m .
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 947\65x\6918

 
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
15
16
17
18
19
a
3
4
5
6
0
9,'re,
let's sow a' to teat tq, i-
A
lhst's task 2i1 is co ccrrptate the leichote
collcc[im system . L e `can t
;:r is
, ;: .:,~„ heft
w-
;xa uirxC Lne l?,;J,ate
men'±w Ti. ; ,L1
Letattitte ns
ere of the primary (xr.-c+r'izL th2sts, rd mat's tint
$701,L00.
o
Lhat's the current state; of tie leechate
oiLkcticn system in yo.r cpinim at the larchiIt?
A
It's set forth in err report vhidh ytu have a
ccoy of
. I dn't believe
it rroets tansy's operating
stndardh . I think currently I saw no
wide"
that it
pose, on irmaliete risk to the pblic hsalth tit it
reek significant writ . You can tell by the ,il(ar
figse alone . Thane's a signffic-it arrant of
irtfrastrtrtiaa that r
to be int~tcd in the tadiiLl
in order to efficiently ad crnprdvasivety extract the
loadhate from the facility
.
And then prepare a arstri.ction
gaalrty assuraooo
report, again, to have in this roioDrtirg
resfusibi lities and
ctsts to report to the IEPA the
mrpletia, of each activity to darastrete that the
activities were done in accordance with the epp,vved
epprnndh
. So, we've got
tot
8746,000 worth of
leachate
LINDA
infrestncvureLANCE
REPQITLNGinvestment
.
--
847\658\6918
identify that's rut there . Nw •e h . se, $7,500 to
design a cover system after we hew that's there, and
then design the first land form and storm deter
nw event system, bract is really tying in all the
emtan of the site, of abc t $10,000 . For octal
metre
fm
of
the
first mv9r, stone stet naikgeieit
system, all the earth work if you will, .e h . 5-6
million dollars . So, the final roar system we're
reining jest drat 5 .7 million dollars .
And these rurbers irclcdirg both A and B,
right?
A
Yeah, A end B .
Q
So, of the 7.4 miLLirn, 56 is ihet you
estimate to be the cost of pitting in the final rover?
A
Yep. We have Landfill gas nasgers,t
monitoring that ircit
e.'eltieting the gar m Parcel A,
cSigi Parcel A gas mavsena,id system, caiplete the
irataltatim of Parcot a gas manager," system, install
ad cgmstnct the ladfill Parcel A gas ma,ageert
system, and
than r- irs to gas prcb , and the-, cadet
egoirg ladfi l I gas monitoring . so, we hoe start
841,000 worth of Landfill
gs_s cc stnrtirr wrk that's
reccsaory .
G
Hcr ct
that 841,0[71 rnTere to other ga>
LINDA LAND REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
B1
Yn.i rrwiasly nxnticmai 8?01,C0?.
[hat -era jest for the to
1Lectim system
.
1hr
: e - r€car
_.43,[Y,0
of nt .r 'La Per=_ tl^at
:xa
mhrot-
G
reef .
A
Firal m.2r system and the final Lard
Neon,
the iser~e art there ri of mw is rnottdy krns precisely
how rnah soil cover is m top of specifically the west
side portion . Based on
visrol . evidace at the site,
there are sum fairly deep errosion gulliee, But those
deep evasion mines, althar, they pue ah issue of
Lack of neintavu, what I'm able to tell from than is
that there is a fairly thick dyer of soil over that
facility right now Jnich is a good thing . And the areas
that I've Locked at, I've seen Main areas u,v.( a
there's over than to three
feet of soil existing ever
that site . &rt dclndy errors rat's there, ad in ordr
for us to design a m er system that is respectful of
the tax[ayers' money, thigh I'm aeaaning Morris is
spending the mast', we should evaluate Jhat's on that
deer- system ad Litu[ize Jsetever we
can of that
cover
system as opposed to jest the assnptin waald be that
it's rot there at alL, So,
we have 350,000 to go met
and pate the cure system at fairly tight intervals to
LINDA LANCE R6altIbG --
64768\6918
s-, a systems at other tadfi Its Lewd an your
aq;eriaAe?
A
ua tb a lot of other. landfills so I think
acre for acre it's similar
. tw'w got about 85 acres of
footprint here
. So, it's rot, it's rot a small cloare
activity, if you will
. And than the first is
pmt-cL®ure activity.
0 Let me stay on the gas , just for a
minute . brat control devvice tore you centatpletim7
A
The first task is acbelly
ladfill g s
evabatia, . lle'lL acttatly go cut and do
a strdy of the
ladfi ll ad idettify haw nrxh 93s is there, the gelity
of the gas, end then make a redo mcdatian
on'' "'s the
best tey to treat the gas .
a
So, yea havayt bided yet thick ccrhtrol
medhanism ,
A lop jest made assurptiaa. My assumption is
that the west side is prcbabLy ah the duhilL side of
the dune ad there's prtbfbly rot nrh on the east
side. l e avid be wrug by that but you rtmLLy read to
go in and, you knew, put a prone in end see Jot we got,
see that the gelity ad gsntity of the made is ad
the ; do a pro form ad see ihether or not i t makes
see_ to jhet flare it, incinerate it, or go to ga,ed
LINDA LANCE nTTNG -- 847A658\6718

 
6
7
8
23
24
2
3
4
1
2
tasoi on the findings that
you care tp with for the
leachate
collection
systen, how Long would it take to
mstnrt the leahate ccrstrtrtion collective?
A
well, it's really rot recessarity a gestim
of how Lo-g it's going to take . There's a series of
emits ad apparels that have to ocewr . &j, it doesn't
treks
any
sense for is to csig, a cap until we go out
and do the probes and figure out what's there . We had
schodiled begimirg with this fall --
well, we've got
this sumer ergoing which is aziplete, the rautire
grardeter monitoring, ceplete the leschate
nmitoring, ca,tirue the Landfill. gas monitoring, ad
that the aiual re mire that's required uider our
pertain .
"Inning in the fall, if we were going to
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
. . -- SL7\66"188 . .
going on for a period of six years until ultimate
closure .
a
Can you just --
)a
nay have die so, but can
you clarity what work has been done es of today?
A
1k have done anneal rep" ire. we've gore
out ad assessed the grurdater nmitorirv network
. We
have inplarented 9roitbeter nmitorirg . We've gave out
and assessed the Landfill gas system including the
ladfi Lt gas nmitorirg system ad iuplearnted
landfill
gas nolitorirg .
ran you explain, and I hate to keep
interrtptire, but can you e?p(ain what you r1 ' by
Landfill gas rrmitoriru?
A
Vk are regjired order the permit to nuiitor
ladffll gas in the Ladfitt and areud the perfrtter of
the lardfi It m a m
. ably basis .
Is that the six-face
mars?
A
It's sirface as well as cihorfeoe.
so, it's Like oxygen content,
nether e
content, and those sorts of things of the gas itself in
the wells?
A
In the wells, right. And that had rot been
do rt or-tadly or at legally by the IEPA . Vk wart ait
end toad at the probes ad ford then, figs out
LINDA LANCE REPORTING
-- 847\658W18
2
3
19
20
21
22
23
I
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
irpleKrit at attatrad~t plan, we i> :a,rcx~-cal anther
rcu-
kily
L hu-e:r-j
thorrtrd coLLars work this'ialt '.hid,
irclhiVad eat#li-v0 hr .=-'~rord.ater rare3ment zax : If
se ,zn't cat
7;,2'
: .,1' ;l Is^ii
.-.rd
:Kornfl
trYn Iwldi tie
agrr y early on, it ctcrr
all other factors
. So,
it
doesn't salle ay sane for ,u
to rush out there and
start pluking dirt in the grand uitit we understand
whet we're doing
. we've got the gra Setar nonitorlng
work to do this fall, the gas nanitrirg
probe
repair.
And
than, like I said, probe the ladfill to figre out
what we have acct there
.
Q
Right-
A
Then we have work sculled for the winter of
2005 and 2007 and we broke this into season
pcpecefuLly . lhere are certain activities that don't
lard thansely® very well to surner work and there ere
certain activities that dart lad thaiselyes very welt
to winter work . So, we tried to stage things in a
logical order and than have earth boring activities
occur in the spring ad sumac versus starting it in
October.
Umbra .
A
we're Lcokirg to get the lay of the lad
Ard that really has us begimirg work this fall and
- LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\65B'L918
i4iidi ass we mild use, which ones
we couldn't, and
began the rrmtwrirg system. W bow nmitorirg what
we mild .
your nmitarirg is umitcrirg of the gas
theselves?
A
Correct .
Not of the wells?
A
well, there's gas plies around . welts are
nonitorire wells . Now we also started monitoring of the
gas -- or the grairrlater =mitering wells .
Okay .
A
And then we've also evaluated the Leedhebe
collection systan, Meat's there and what reads to to
cane to the beast of our ability to trxierstad that-
Rage you ore any construction out there or
installed any, aythirg at the ladfitL, any wells or
A
No, we have rot participated in any
a,-stnrtion activities . We have rot participated in
any corer repair . We have rut had any city eaplorees,
other than rrey±e the mayor
or sarethirg stadim at the
gate, entering the site ad doing
any
of the activities .
I was irstnxted to go took at that inspection
report,
idhntify what's there and report back as giick as
LIMA LANCE REPORrlNG --,847\658\6918
.vend.
n
Let ri get ytxl rah trd tack viii up a Little
nit .
.nrs-
U
There's a gastim
I wanted to ask yoi
.
A
It takes a lot to get ns nod .
U
I only got three hours . Maybe I can do it .
A
You can take alt night, fire with lie .
Q
I just wanted To ask how Long )cu thadght,

 
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\65816918
nn,itrirg, $809,000 ; adcad.ct routine ladftlt gas
margament ad monitorirp at $110,000, for a total of a
little over 2 .6 millim.
O
Okay. Now the arrest permit ®t Ls for the
groundwater
treatment ad Leachate treatment far
a
hu&nd year period but you -- end you've used 30 wars
as your estimate?
A
R1¢d .
0
Why 30 versus 1(107
A
Because .I ekn't beliwe there's any
scientific evidence that warrants (a) pumpirg
9rarrSater for a htr&th years ; (b) pumping and
treatirg le8dtate for a hudrad years .
I'm not seeing
the evidece to d, that . I thick, you k,oe, the way
that those cumbers cam dour I thick you have to
u,d?rstand the permitting erodes ad specifically the
groundwater
modeting process . Arid I thirk if you go
tr~ Gad Lode at hawu the mcdet ues pit tc
sties
ad
the
iteratias that wan back ad forth, I thirk they
just
" .snit, of
Te sYOirnir0 of whether -~- did bent
v
:mi tcir
on
tc
~p
t
cn the site and do that . In
ny
~.vflsr`o-. t~.ere
a little jousting
I f 'IP ne,
hrr'_ .H itiin
to
w m the site ac do cur
-
env3tiaF .
C
were you denied access at ay poirm?
A
I dhYt recall specifically . 1 Ivnw then
ice was
dis~,icn about it .
a
s
., I thick as far as I'm carsrnad you
diennea the grcvdleter nimitorirg network ad the
laaciete m.vx} n i .i t system, the final wren, the cost m
it, and
the ladf i l l gas
. Now about -- i s there
anything specific as far as post-elate activities .
A
Yes . we r-
vdsd
-- `ell, we categorized
than into for large areas of activities lndufirg
rcutire irerscties and naintewce, this is far the
entire 30 years, of about a Little over $401,(100
;
routine grardater monitoring at 1 .3
million;
routine
leachate nrrngaartt ad monitoring at SM9,WD
; and
routine --
a
I wider if we can start war bemse you're
givirg the numbers I was going to ask about
.
A
Tr» fast
. The routine inspectims aid
neinte nnca, 8401,000
; routine gratrtdweter nvtitorirg at
3
5
6
9
0
12
13
14
15
6
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2
LINDA LANCE RF cRtING --
.847\658\4&18
defaulted ad said welt rk, that just to get the permit
.
That doesn't necessarily make sale fran a pbtic
health, safety ad weLfare.
Q
Are the two periak, the 30 years ad 100
years, in the r
alatiors
someplace?
I menu I really
rbi't know myself .
A
Yeah, the e+otutim of the regulations are
interesting in and of thareeLvea -
The 30 years, there's
e Lot of
ate about what the magic comer is- The
regulations in IILireis were written in that am pretty
closely to &±title D,
ad that it says to the effect is
that you're goirg to how to meintein this IadfiLL far
at least 30 years after you ctoee it
. The dgacy may
rewire you to
monitor
it for Ln er than 30 years if w
thick it's still a threat . We haven't had Subtitle D
facilities out there that Lag so we don't know, wwetly
lit-tow that that constitutes at some point
. But we do get
irrtortmtim from empiricat evidmoe at older Ladftlls,
and
we km..
that some of the older pr-$ttitte
D
tadfiUs realty do becare relatively imoans after
snieshefe dare to that
. The Subtitle D facility, I
think we hale all had the opinion, ad we're realty short
m evidece, eepirical evidence, the hWred years mores
from the grrutteter impact rmtl which is, which is
LINDA LANCE RFPMTING -- 847\658\6918
1 .3 millim .
a okay.
Yeah, I think you said 3 millim.
A
Okay, sorry.
Q
May .
A Cardtt routine lute na, a
it and
39
1
p>y;ible
m health ad safety is~a;, a-1 fly
1
2
re_omesr_`atirn hat these were ere&
; tint I inDded to
2
3
tnzrstaril tefxt I acid na.Pc a'1 gpiri .n m .[Gh
h, std
5
0 As you
War, !twictsly, Cunnnity Latf ;Ll
5
6
Crptsry is the grretor of the LY-dfi 11 ptraa-k to an
6
7 ig~t with the city?
8A
Yes .
8
9Q
Does the agreerm[ permit the city to care in
9
10
aid do easy corstrtrctim work? In other is
rds, des the
10
11
city have access to the site to do any ccstructjm work
11
12
or a-y pajor work at this print?
12
13
A
Youu jam,
I lrn+what the inert is . If
13
14 you're asking me for at interpretation, of the contract
14
15
bctvwa the tan, I thick that's prnhebly Leyvd the
15
16
octet .
16
17
Q
If the city, for exaiple, the city wasted to
17
18
go in and install a
new ges system today cnlld they,
18
19 hesrd on your urhrstadirg, mold they go in and do it?
19
20
A
I dvt't know .
20
21
0 Did you cleat with that
whole
easy issue, or
21
22 the rrritract Issue, or the Lease issue in
your
22
23 rainnsrbtios?
23
24
A
I wouldn't say the lease issue. There was
an
24

 
15
7
8
9
10
1
12
13
14
rot rec}Jir
in party racy raiy states . i n I lliroio they
6ecidnd to k t recjjtaticm that
:ere M-Lh more strict
than ~kbtitle Ii, Federal abtitle 0 regulations, ad
undue s to ninactnae via this norktiry that ijie
facility is safe, Meaning that it wn't it t the
groundwater
one,
hrdrei )ears after ctraure within art
hudr d feet of the footprint
. And I thick the rmdatirg
is a very very useful tool- I'm afraid that the
nnMing has gotten a little bit out in front of
rational decision and I think this is a good exaiple
where the msielirg has klrd of Lost the forest for the
trees what the real ps a of it was to begin with . I
thick blot's
where the regulator was at this point .
They, had to dawstrate some way if they were ping to
tea
.=
a permit that the facility wnild net impact the
grout. ter a haviad years, and the way they did it is
by joust Pumping the grard,ater and treetirg it which
is, you know, kird of like an old soviet L1,icn type
aFp,oach, well, we'll just put a bigger egire On the
tack of the thing, rot a very elegant egireerirg
solution .
Q
Is -- when we talked r6out it earlier, the
waste relocation I thick, when we were talking abort
waste relx,eticn, you were saying that Parcel A passed
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
93
15
16
17
18
19
m
21
22
23
B
9
10
11
12
13
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Z3
24
2
3
5
6
7
the mupl or the mxIel slpestal that it would press and
Parcel B
suaa~te.1
it would rot ps?
A I
get those two caihred all the time so I
have to p track . Fart, y1;,
he et ice was that the
closure plat had a fairly
low unit ttst of waste
relocation of same two bucks a yard or something
to bat
order
. The Only way
you
could come apshere close to
rweriro that is seaming that the waste is reto
--
asstmirg that the waste is relocated Legally is that it
was relocated in the sere facility
. You wnmLci't be
able to load it up and take it to a truck and tale it to
anther LadfiLI at two bxks a yard . so, the only
aswiptlai You can get to is that it was actmiLy
disposed of within that some, facility . if you were
going to take it off of A, the only other place was the
other wit which failed the model .
0
So, I gxss what -- where I'm going is that
Parcel A or Parcel B -- Parcel B is i
hem the aert,eiyit
is at .
A
Go ahead, I'm listening .
0 And that passed the medal which essentially
I
toot to mean that the grardeter ini,,t was not so IJdi
a prahlen on Parcel B .
A
Walt, that's what the ILPA's opinion mat
able to withdraw the contaminants fuss the facility that
pose the threat, pit a toner on the facility so that the
contaminants are isolated iron the envirauewt, end
monitor the facility after those features are in piece
so we can tell how suxcessful we're maagins this
. And
at this
particular
site for several reasons that's
altogether a good solution . First, it's the presumptive
solution that the agency uses
. It's the
presunptfea
solution that the U.S . EPA uses . And it flakes sense In
a Lot of cases
because certainly it's the most
economical, and if we're talking about agyadire
tapsyets' matey, that cant be forgotten . The
taVayers
dxyt profit from the facility. They use any
income they got for other pblic reeds but they also -
hate the unique cafsbiIity to treat ltedwate cheaper
that tnybody . And when you look at the surnourding Lard
use arard this facility, this is a more
-- swn a more
t;.ctcriate
tech
. Phew you loot at the existence of
city water, when you loot at the water that we're
monitoring, the water of oawm that we're nxietirg to,
you can't drink etyway. But there are no welts around
the site . It sears to me that
we might to, you Ira,,
start molly foasirig m how to pit the real facts in
front . And I'm cacerred Men I read the Pollution
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
1
have been. They passed the model and issued a permit
2
for it and the other parc>et they did isaJe a permit but
3
G
they rec}Jired this re,ediatim system to be implemented
before they wild issue the permit . A'd if you look
.5 beck at the
ad
permit
into it, it's because the
par
6 murkt as presented to the agony didYt neet that
100
7 foot, 100 year criteria . So, I gins it's a
se,", it
8
issue and I dn't want to get into that . simply put, it
9 didn't meet that bs i and they defaulted to this other
10
appruadi .
11
0
But it almost soxcla like if Parcel A had
12
manor bear, opened rune of us would be talking cwt this
13 hundred year leadiate treatnett; is that a fair
14.
concision
15
A
I wart to make sae I've got the right ore
.
16 Parcel A d>e; rot have the ovrfill, right?
17
0
Right
.
18
A
You know, there's a lot of different ways
.
19
Yea could have maybe mrdled it differently, maybe You
20 mild have cadged it differently
. I didn't go beck
21
ad rentt the facility . We could do that bit I er'L
22 Think that d,ag~
the facts of how we clove the
23
facility. I thick that would be an exercise in
24
aca J,ies
. I mew realty what we want to do now is be

 
actual tkerd e
4-151m
that they mitnt-~stco:! all of
Pop exeirple th~,, su d
+f,,1
.he ci Cy
"1 n iY wt nJ b -CF-l
f
c( 3~ t . -d
'UI :i
n
In
very err:'
rot, _w.
--
Q
6otl, &on you're talkina aFwt the Homo's
declaim, you're c fin1tely talking etctrt e legal
decision .
A MMLL, 1 krn+wliat c¢ratedariltery
facilities on site are.
M . IEL51EN : I object Mr
. Grant
. He can
go to the frets- He can disaas the facts without going
to the Legal conclusion .
M . GRANT : I'll to happy to go thragh
it but they, yew kna7, they deciod J,at
they
dsicled .
I roan I try rot to be argurelrzitive on the issues .
M . HELSIEN : But it goes to what's
practical here ad what's ~ry and realistic here
which is the heart, in my opinion, of the Board's June
1, 2006 order
. In s&meraL instances they say we shwld
fort m what's practicable, feasible and realistic
here . To oh that you have to took really at udarLyirg
facts upon which they Ivse their opinions, both the --
M . GZAXT : Ch, yeah, ad I
tat
LINDA LANE REP tTING -- 847\658\6918
1
point .
2
EXAMIk1TICN
3
BY M . GRAYSGN :
4 Q I have a male of
questions.
I ores
5
wondering
if you could, ed maybe you could use this,
6
draw a very basic di'siras, I'm a visrel perm,, and In
7
terns of the core of attention that you're talking
8 abort, I kird of
visualize
it e a bull's-eye, that the
9
center area may be where the waste is and than it kird
10
of goes out like That . If you could, just d, aaethirg
11
that's real simple .
12
(Wetness marking an blaod-oard .)
13
A
Kind of like a put pie, if you will If ymu
14
inagine a pot pie with the cyst as the ladfilt ad the
15
mat as the liter, the Landfill in cries section,
16
atthodi ass am
not loot exactly like this . It tools
17
like this
. One htrdred feet frtm to
o,*
of the taste
18
we have to haw mrptiave at this point . This area in
19
here is called the zee of attacetian . We have to
20
prove that ", thing that might core from the LadfilL
21
doe' not measurably 1rFsct the grwda3ter m the other
22
sit of that Lire . In three dirasias this waatd be
23
I
the grad sur-fam- Let's do it like this . That's the
24
tar-dfitl in
three
dimensions if you're following ae, it
LINDA LANE REPORTING -
847\658\6918
z
that a>d y+ j ,~,e clear avu* in your
&d
t' t - of tea rt>rcrs e',r gas --
w;,w
sort of
elk x r c
h to p into the yrarC o` detail you hxw
L
En , r
reij n m ¢trnel to, you Iava,, bairg rcilly
5
to uniryL en
it tisane that is certainly the case .
6
Bat, yn know, as we've talked about Dmek, or job is
7
to anfonre the regulations
. I "Van if they're cot Lair®
8
net, than it's a violation or you charge it
.
9
M . IELSTEN : Sure,
10
M
. 92AM
: Those are ralLy the options .
11
But if you're talking a6cut Legitimately his going to
12
the M(c) factors --
13
M . IELSTEN : Ri¢,t, that's that we
14
thick, uhid, the Board said go to the M(c) factors ad
75
any facts that hire rpm those determinations and 1
16
thick that's what Mr . Meese is doing .
17
THE WITNESS
: That's, You know, clearly
18
what I'm doing . I thick the 33(c) factors are
19
consistent with my obtfgatim as an ongiraer
.
20
M- [RANT : Yeah, it's --
okay, we don't
21
have to talk on the re-ord
.
I do rant to talk with him
22
ace rare time . I'll be lark In a ain/te.
23
(AA short break was talon-)
24
M, GMT : That's all I have at this
ITIM LANCE REPORTING -- 8471E68\d918
Would Le a zone that Would stilt go like that .
Q
OW.
The other grstim that I had was When
you ware referring to all the diffetait aspects of the
closure and post-closure care it seams as if you had a
piece of papa that you were looking at that bed sere
figucs on It ad I I wandering if
M3*e You would
like to mark that as a, Ed,ibit
end get a copy of it .
A
For the existing permitted facility
on Parcel
A aril Parrot B, they're simply copies out of the
-- ash,
this is not it, out of the existing permit
. had than I
have copies of the revised permit application that's
arrantty pending and I cal certainly do that- And I'll
make far tapirs of Aadh of tfiese?
M . GRANT : That would be great .
M . KEGLER : off the record.
(A discussion
was had off the record.)
BY MS
. 1eAYS7l :
0
1 was referring to when )ou were going
thrad, item ae thragh five, me beirg grarfireter,
tea, lemhate maigeirent, the tatter part of )Or
c4 csitim after tip break .
A
That was a dxurmt that I prepared at the
Ten}set of Mr . Helstmi,
M . IELSIEN : Yeah, I don't have a
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- &.7\68\6918
98

 
I
IrctLen with this
. It was soirg to the Stte
";ay,
FvatL
:M1y it i4 quire to Le Sctnlitted t:0 ytJ
94'S . it
was ckre at
fly irstnrtim to swnit to the state, so .
142 . CFAKT
; Let's
110
off rntil he gets
tw:k .
c I
(A short brink was taken,)
7
BY MS . GRAYSON :
D
Q
Can, other q,estio,. At one point Ohm you
9
were talking about the overhe4t yw said that exaunirg
10
ad llwirg is not without issues- Mat would some of
11
those issues be?
12
A
iJelL, when you a u1e waste there is an odor
13
i53L . So, you're going to have a, significant increase
14
In potential for
odors.
You can mitigate that by dnirg
15
it drirg the winter auntie, but in this partiwtor
16
cage, you know, that would affect schedite also,
17
linotirg that to a particular wird~ of tine, If You
18
were to -- when you move waste, you ear a the
19
construction workers to the leadrate, sharp neteriat, so
20
that rreterial and the caetn.ctim
work, you have to
21
de~etap a corstnrtim writer safety plan to protect the
72
workers, You also have residsl tearhate that
my 6e as
23
pert of that,
and
in this particular case if ware goirg
24
to be taking the garbage, Loading it m vehicles and
.
LPDA IAMM REPORTING -- &7\&%\6918
LIIDA . . LANCE RERRTI.NG -- 847\658\6918
10'1
102
1
rtkirii it into the, at Leest for a short prricei of tine,
rrao
de p±Lie road or aorc s the phlic r
,j,
it
=r>at, eeatter potential safety cr rua.ztu~
i=sje rat.
~ I ree_s to ir_ rcsol`red
Ad aki~I .
5
MS, Gt4YSt
: That's aLL I have . Thn'k
6
you.
7
MR
. HELSTEN : I have nothing,
8
(Exhibit No's 6, 7, ad 8 were marked
9
for idttificatim an 8-2-(36 .)
10
M2 . (RANT : IJe're finished, I weld Like
11
to attach three exhibits
. Exhibit Nuiter 6 is titled
12
Premature closure Cast Estimate and was referral to by
13
Mr
. Moose drirg the deposition. Exhibit 7 -- I'm
14 sorry, Ed,ibit 6 is part
B
. Exhibit 7 is Premature
15
Close Cost Estimate - Parcel A, m the first page,
16
ad was also referred to ad used by Mr . Moose, Nd
17
Exhibit No . 8 is --
18
THE WITNESS: Mayte alternative cL n
19
appcech
.
20
FR . [RANT :
Right- It's mother
21
dxuient, at the top shay
. Enwirvraiital, Ins
.
22
Alternative, how would ytu
describe
It?
23
THE WITLESS : I'd call it the elternative
24
closure approach .
STATE OF ILLINOIS)
NNTY OF McHENRY) SS
I LIMN A- LANCE, Certified 9,orthad
R
er No- 84-j565, eg lsteredCc~Prt'otyfeasiorsalrRyg~nrter,
Il~mis,, l
dher
Mcli of
cxamratian,
P
truth
.E.,
ad
PEE,
nothing
previous
wee
bit
dlthe .y
to
rt~Hitacm
certify
the mlmenoement
byme
that
to
OEVIN
testify
ofAhis
.
to
MXr;E
the
~
that
taken
there
atthewere
tine
I
present
ARTIER
and place
CERTIFY
those
in
parses
the
that
caption
the
and
deposition
parties
steified
aswasad
indicated m the appearance page of said transcript .
shorthand the foregoingI
ARTIER CERTIFY that I rcrted in
caused to be treat d
ngs ad thereafter
ofeg
an
o ire transcript, peges
of
1 thrall,my
, rthad
in"PT
rotes .
is a true d bor'rett trauri ption
suit
thereoffor
nor
nor
.
inan any
I in
wayI
ay
FLRTHER
related
wayCERTIFY
interested
to aty
that
of
in
the
I
the
aR
parties
a
not
tca,t
carrel
to this
IN WITNESS I&EREOF, I have hererito set
Aigst
my hardAail.D
.
affixed
2MS .
my notarial seal this 14
of
r .
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\6918
OFPICIAL SEAL
LINDA A LANCE
SOTARY
SPATE OF KLpJYS
~ry
aI16 as
LINDA LANCE REPORTING -- 847\658\E918 .
um
rr )
4%
Certified 9,a-thad
Registered
Notary Rblic
ProfessirrslMollery
Conty;enterer
103
10
:
1
FR . (RANT : This was also used
end
2 referred to during the dgxsitim .
2
3
MR. HELSIEN : Mr . Moose, you have the
3
4
opportunity to review the de esitim
--
4
5
THE WITNESS : . Yes, I would Like to
.
5
6
FR . HESTDI : --
for amaray. So, you'd
6
7
Litre to, okay. !So, we reserve Signature .
7
8
MR . GRANT- I'LL order it tp .
B
9
(Ed,ibit No
. 4 was marked for
9
10
identification m 8-2-06,)
10
11
MR . G+ANT
: Also, we would like to add as
11
12 an exhibit, Exhibit No
. 4 which is m atllne of the
12
Is topics that Mr . Moose disused of the queue tasks and
13
14 disarcsel during the depasitim-
1
15
TFE WITNESS
: That was acttally discussed
15
16 with Mr
. Child m June 13, 2006- It's basically
an
16
17 agenda for the heating .
17
13
MR . GRANT . Okay.
15
19
MR . FELSTEN : . It Touches upon isles
19
2'J
disused
today .
21)
21
FR .
GLINT : Sure .
21
22
73
(The deposition ended at 3 :55 p.m.)
24

 
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17 .
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
F
EEFcRE TFE fLLIfr3JS FCLLLTTQ,I Cfltmpj raYuO
EPLE OF THE SATE C3 iLL 1 FX)1S, 1
Gcn~lElila'~t,
cs.
3 Ho,
M-191
m
Ccyuu
m
CITY
.nlci{sl
ILIirvis
Cf
rY
lKTL.'RIS,
csrpratim,.4Dw'pcratim,
:I L7-m CEWA1Y,
Illirnisa-d
INCthe.
)
)
Respu,dcrGs .
I, PEVIN A. MYSE, P.E., DEE, h,-t/ certify
that I have read tha for iru trarccripr of m;
deposition SiVt1 at the tine ad ptarn aforesaid,
casistiny of
p3ga 1 thrayl 103, ircluiw, a,i I cb
again
srtsrrlha
ad make oath that the sore is a tnc,
correct and cmplate trascript
of my &p itiai so
given as
aforesaid, as it rna aTpears .
UtVIN A . RALSt, V.t
.,
L&t
this e~ri6edday
a-d
of s.crn
to hafcre
,
2006ne
.
MY OFFICIAL SEAL
:
WJIAR KSLTL
LIMA LAME RERRTING --
867Nh8\6918
I6

 
pail, I
37:10 ; 72 :11 ; 73;10,12 ;
84 :10,11 ; 94:13 ; 103 :15
add
103 :11
additional 15 :3
address 22 :14
;
74 :7
addressed 102 :4
adequacy 41
:9
adequate 19 :19
adjust 29 :22
Administrative 3 :21
adopt 93 :2
advise 25 :19
affect 101 :16
affixed 104 :16
afford 62
:18,22 ; 63
:1,6
aforesaid 105 :11,15
afraid 93 :8
agencies 12 :17,20
agency 1 :21 ; 2:10
.5 ; 4
:12,
15 ; 8:22 ; 10:19 ; 12:19 ;
16:7 ; 34:13,14 ; 57 :9 ;
64 :15,23
; 86
:5 ; 92 :13 ;
95 :6 ; 96:0
agenda 103
:17
ago 9:8
; 42:6
agree 36 :20, 41 :1,10 ;
47:1
; 63 :20,23 ; 66:20
agreed 28:22 ; 86 :4
agreement 22 :22
; 89 :7,9
agrees 14 :14
ahead 94 :20
alleged 5 :3 ; 25 :17,21 ;
70
:16
allegedly 87 :23
allowed 47 :20 ; 98 :3
almost 95 :11
alone 81 :14
already 18 :7 ; 27:4 ; 57:11 ;
60 :12
t
alternative 2
:23 ; 60:21,
22
; 78:16; 86:1 ; 102:18,
22,23
although 4 :16 ; 36:16
;
57
:8
; 82
:11
; 99:16
altogether 96:7
ambiguous 43 :13
American 6 :9
amount 30:17 ; 31 :7 ; 33:2,
6,21 ; 39:9 ; 40:13,21 ;
41 :16,23 ; 58:8 ; 62:14 ;
63 :14 ; 78:24 ; 81 :14 ; 93:3
analysis 7 :23 ; 36 :7
ancillary 97:4,9
and/or 67 :23
Andrews 27 :15,17,19
annual 85 :22 ; 87:5
another 6:18;21 :9; 27 :6 ;
66:13 ; 67:6; 68 :13 ; 82 :3 ;
86:1 ; 94 :12; 102:3,20
answer 56 :20 ; 57:16
; 66
:9 ;
67 :20
answers 2
:19,20 ; 69
:10 ;
75
:16
anybody 27:9 ; 28 :4 ; 75;7 ;
96 :16
anyway 32:18 ; 80:4 ; 96 :21 ;
101 :1
app . 40 :15
appearance 104
:9
appeared 1 :20,24 ; 2
:3
.5,8 ;
26 :18
appears 49 :11
; 73
:24
;
105 :15
apples
-44 :24 -
applicant 4 :21
application 17 :9,12,16 ;
30
:7 ; 37:19
; 40 :4
; 64:8,
17 ; 65 :1 ; 77:11
; 78 :12,
08-02 .06 Deposition of Devin 1loose
----------------------- -
S
--------------------------
55 .50 41 :4
s;701,000 81 :6
5809,400 56 :2
$841,000 03 :22
77 :12
2
.6 61 :'14,18,20 ; 62 :3,12,
19 ;
91 :8
20 4
:19 ; 23 :17
200 2:2 ; 76 :13 ; 80 :23
2000
20 :4,8,9
; 31 :22 ;
53 :13,23 ; 71
:23
642-4414 2
:3
69 2 :19,20
69,000 80 :8
--- -- ---------------
7
7 2 :15,22 ; 102 :8,13,14
I --------------------------
_° . ,----
'77 5 :23
'80's 7 :15 ; 8 :11 ; 20:19
;
21 ;8 ; 54:22
2000-155-LFM 31
:22 ; 32 :13
2000-156-LFM 32 :5
2001 57 :22 ; 71 :23
2004 22
:11,21,23
; 23 :17 ;
26 ;8,10; 27 :7
; 30 :16 ;
31 :7 ; 32:20
7,500 83 :1
7
.4 61
:21,23 ; 62 :11,18,21 ;
77 :3,9,16,20 ; 78 :3 ; 83 :13
701,000 82 :1
746,000 81
:23
782-5544 1
:23
.5
'83 5 :24 ; 7 :16
2005 27 :8 ; 32 :21 ; 64 :11 ;
----------------------
'84 7 :16
70 :15 ; 71
:8,16 ; 72 :10
a
'87 8:12
2006 1 :14; 69:11
; 74
:9 ;
'88 8 :12
86 :14 ; 97:20 ; 103 :16 ;
8 2 :23 ; 102 :8,17
'90's 30:21
104:16 .5 ; 105 :19
8-2.06 5 :9 ; . 25 :8 ; 69:1
;
--------------------------
2007 86 :14
102 :9
; 103 :10
201 81 :2
8 .4 61 :10
20th 1 :18.5
809,000 57:24 ; 90 :19 ; 91 :6
- 2 :12 ; 103 :22,24
217 1 :23 .5
814-5388 1
:19 .5
----------------------------------------------------
22 .17 25 :24
815 2 :7 .5
22nd 7:5
84 .
1565 104 :4
------------- ------------
23rd 18 :23
841,000 83 :24
.086 58:20 ; 59
:11
24th 18:24 ; 19:2
85 84:4
------ 25 2
:18 .5
0
27th 19 :2
28,000 79 :1
--------------------------
03-191 1
:4 ; 105 :4
2810 2 :2
950 40 :1,12
086 58:5 ; 59 :10
2nd 1 :14
950,000 39
:24
; 40 :20,24 ;
-------------------------- --------------------------
41 :12
1
3
975 40 :2
______--__----_-------
975,000 40 :12
1 1 :15
; 2
:18
; 5
:a,11
;
3 2:15,19,20 ; 68 :24 ; 69:5, 99 2:15 .5
97 :20 ; 104 :11 .5 ; 105 :12
8,12 ; 91 :2
1 .3 90 . 18 ; 91 :1
3.50 41 :3
A
1 .4 65
:12
3 .7 65 :11
--------------------------
1 .6 61 :18
30 9:18 ; 15 :9 ; 55:23
;
A .D . 1 :14.; 104:16 .5
10 2 :18,18 .5,21,22,23 ;
56
:4 ; 76 :17 ; 90 :17
;
abandon 79 :13
61
:4,24 ; 62
:11 ; 65 :4,13 ;
91 :11,14
; 92 :4,8,13,14
abandoned 53 :24 ; 79 :22
77 :24
300 76 :14
abandonment 54 :1 ; 79 :11
10,000 83 :5
300,000 40 :9
ability 48 :12 ; 49 :18
;
10-20-04 2 :18 .5 ; 29 :9
312 1 :19.5
; 2
:3
72 :14 ; 88:14
10_1 42 :7,9 ; 45 :24 ; 46:4 ;
33 98:12,14,18
able 37:21 ; 59:22 ; 71 :6;
49:1 ; 50 :20
35 26:20,22 ; 27:1
82
:12
; 94:11 ; 96:1
100 2 :6
; 36:4,22
; 76 :12,
360 43:16
academic 38:8
13 ; 91 :14 ; 92 :4 ; 95 :6,7
3 :55 103
:23
academics 95 :24
101,000 42 :6
----------------------
Academy 6 :9
102 2 :21,22,23
accept 12 :11 ; 26:8 ; 34 :11 :
1021 1 :22
----------------------
41
:19
103 2 :24 ; 104 :11 .5 ; 105:12 4 2:15 .5,24
; 103:9,12
accepted 41 :8
11 2 :24
400 76 :15
accepting 57 :1
110,000 91 :7
401,000 90
:17,24
access 89 :11,21 ; 90 :1,6
1150 1 :13
45,000 82 :3
accordance 28 :21 ; 70 :17,
122nd 5 :4
475,000 40:14
19 ; 81 :22
13 103 :16
49 7 :5
according 42 :7
130th 5 :5
490-4906 2 :7 .5
accountant 13 :18
1389 2 :6 .5
--------------------------
accreditation 6 :13 ; 7 :2
14 22
:21 ; 23 :12
5
accuracy 103:6
14th 104 :16
--------------------------
accurate 17 :18; 47 :5 ; 77 :4
15,000 79 :10
5 2 :18,18 .5 ; 25 :7,11 ;
acquired 9 :7
155 32 :13
25 :17
acre 84 :4
156 32:12
5_1 65
:11 ; 77:13
acres 84:4
16 41 :17
5 .6 83 :7,13
across 102:2
16th 57:18
5.7 65 :6
; 83:9
Act 4:3 ; 10 :9 ; 27:5
; 64 :3 ;
17 33
:21 ; 63 :12,22
50,000 82 ;23
66 :5
18 69:11
500 76 :16
action 4:3 ; 23 :18 ; 28 :12 ;
188 1
:18 .5
52 52:16
29
:23
19276 1 :22 .5
---------- --- -------
actions 69 :13,17 ; 70 :10
1940's 42 :15
6
activities 53 :20 ; 56 :7 ;
1996 40 :15
--------------------------
70 :3 ; 76 :17; 81
:22 ;
1 :10 1
:15
6 2 :21
; 102 :8,11,14
86 :15,17,19 ; 88
:19,22 ;
6-13=05 . 2 :24
90 :13 . 15
2
60 4
:17
activity 81 :21 ; 84
:6,7
-
60601 1 :19 ; 2 :2.5
actual 34:4 ; 44 :14
; 53 :12 ;
7 2:19
; 40:3,11
; 41 :9 ; ---
61105 . 1389 2:7
58:23 ; 83 :5
65 :10
; 68:24 ; 69:5,7 ;
62794-9276 1 :23
actually 11 :16 ; 12 :8
;

 
00-02 70611epusiti an of nevin 8,mse
14 ; 00:5 ; 100 :11
I utt_nuetion 36 :4 ; 43 :18 ;
j
44 :20
; 47 :6,7,11,24 ;
big 8 :2 ; 37:12 ; 42 :1 ;
categories 76 :6 ; 78 :20
applications 21 :22,23
50 :20 ; . 53 :4
bi99er 93 :19
categorized 90 :14
applied 45
:16
42
8
:2,8,10,12,19 ; 51 :24 ;
79:21
; 99 :7,19
category 25 :24
bi99est 44 :3
bind 67 :21 ; 65 :10
approach 2 :235
; 33 :6,12,
_caused 104
:11_ .
14 ; 60 :20 ; 65 :20 ; 76:5 ;
attorney/client 24 :3
center 99 : 9
81 ;23 ; 93 :19 ; 95 :10 ;
audit 21
:3
96 :18
; 102 :19,24
binds 67 :23
central 73
:17
August 1 :14 ; 7 :5 ; 104 :16 .5 bit 11 :10 ; 20 :1 ;
35 :7 ;
cents 58:6
; 59 :8
appropriate 11 :22 ; 45
:13 ;
authority 12 :7
43
:7
; 55
:12 ; 60 :10 ; 85 ;3 ;
certain 18
:10
; 28:15 ;
79:14 ; 96 :18
available 43 :24 ; 75 :10
93 :9
79 :23 ; 82 :15 ; 86 :15,17
appropriately 46
:9
Avenue 1 :13,22 ; 2 :6
blackboard 99 :12
certainty 66 :7,12 ; 96 :10 ;
approvaL 17:3 ; 74 :16
awarded 6 :9
board 1 :1 ; 3 :20 ; 18:8 ;
98:5 ; 100 :12
approvals 85 :15
aware 18 :7,11,12 ; 19 :14,
19 :16 ; 45 :18 ; 57 :11,17 ;
certified 12
:5 ;
104
:3
.5,19
approved 16:24 ; 33 :15 ;
18 ; 20 :4,20 ; 21 :17 ;
98 :14 ; 105 :1
certify 104 :5,7.5,10,13 ;
72:8 ; 81 :22
30 :17 ; 52:11 ; 53:6 ;
Board's 97 :1,6,19
105
:9
challenges 33 :12
Chamtin 28 :4
approximately 3 :12 ; 9 :7 ;
56 :11 ; 57 :11,23
banding 12 :9,17
61 :24 ; 71 :8 ; 79 :10
awareness 20 :13,24
boring 54 :21
April 74 :9
away 51 :18 ; 68:17
Bosco 2 :1
chance 18 :16 ; 51 :24 ; 52:1 ;
aquifer 46:23
awful 7:6 ; 54 :17
both 33 :22,23 ; 47:3 ;
64
:21
area 6 :20,24 ; 7:3,8 ;
awhile 27:19
50 :22,24 ; 66 :3 ; 72 :24 ;
change 43 :5 ; 63 :14 ; 64 :3,
28 :16,18,21
; 29 :5 ; 34
:17,
--------------------------
83 :10 ; 97 :23
6 ; 78 :4 ; 98 :8
18 ; 42 :12,13,14 ; 48 :11 ;
B
bottom 71 :16
changed 9 :13
54 :6,23 ; 74:18 ; 79:21 ;
bound 65:17
changes 13 :6 ; 77:1 ; 86 :5 ;
92 :10 ; 99 :9,18
Bachelor's 5 :18 ; 6 :6
boundary 43
:12 ; 44 :10,16;
95 :22
areas 8:14 ; 29
:1
; 42 :18 ;
back 12:14 ; 16
:14 ; 24 :16 ;
46 :11,12 ; 47:4,9
changing 38 :3
77:15 ; 82:14,15 ; 89 :2 ;
26 :2 ; 29 :13 ; 33 :5 ; 35:15 ; Box 1 :22.5 ; 2 :6.5
charge 58 :2,7,21
90 :15
36 :10 ; 37 :9 ; 40 :21 ; 43 :7 ; brand 17 :14
charges 58
:17,24
aren't 64 :17
55 :15 ; 69 :3 ; 76 :10 ;
break 55 :11 ; 68:23 ; 98 :23 ; Charles 1 :13 ; 2:5 .5 ; 7:11 ;
argumentative 66 :9 ; 97 :16
79 :16 ; 85 :2 ; 88 :24 ;
100:21
; 101 :6
9:17
around 36:22 ; 40
:1
; 42:6,-
91 :23,24; 93 :20 ; 94
:4;
brief 55 :13
cheaper 96:15
43 :15 ; 45 :14 ; 46:23 ;
95:5,20 ; 98 :22 ; 101 :5
briefly 7 :12 ; 28:1
check 37:21
49 :20 ; 61 :4 ; 64 :11 ;
backfilled 54 :10
broke 86 :14
checked 35 :21
65 :13
; 73:23 ; 79 :20
;
background 8:9
broken 60:3,4
;
78 :20
Chicago 1 :19; 2:2 .5 ; 3 :20 ;
80 :2 ; 87:15 ; 88 :8 ; 96:17, bad 40 :23 ; 57 :4
brothers 20
:18
4:22
; 5 :2
21
Bahamas 10
:1
brought 79 :16
Chicago's 4
:23,24
arranging 13
:23
balance 61 :12
BRUCE 1
:21 .5
Child 103 :16
as-built 73 :3
BalefilL 8 :23 ;
12 :14
bucks 41 :1 ; 94 :6,12
choice 66 :18
ascertain 70 :11
base 20 :16 ; 29
:7; 97 :23
bull's-eye 99
:8
choosing 66 :18
aspect 7:18 ; 61 :8,9
based 13 :22 ; 14:10 ; 49 :5, burden 95
:9
chose 37:5
aspects 18 :1Q ; 68:3 ; 100:3 10,11 ; 50 :4 ; 59 :16 ; 70 :8 ; Bureau 2:11
Chris 3 :7; 55 :12
assembled 6 :22
73
:9
; 74 :10 ; . 75 :18
; 82 :9 ; burned 54 :15
Christine 2
:11
assess 70 :6 ; 71
:12
84 :1 ; 85 :10 ; 89:19
burning 53
:19
CHRISTOPHER 1 :17.5
assessed 87 :6,8
basic 99 :6
business 9 :13,14 ; 20 :7,12 ; Chuck 22
:20 ; 39 :19 ; 98 :6
assessing 76:1
basically 26:15 ; 75 :17 ;
66 :21,22
city 1 :6 ; 2 :8 ; 3 :20 ; 4:22,
assessment 35 :3,4
77 :14 ; 103 :16
------------
23 ; 5 :1 ; 18 :2 ; 20
:15,22 ;
assignments 7 :24
basins 15 :11
C
22 :3,6 ; 25 :19 ; 26
:9,15 ;
Assistant 1
:18,21 .5
basis 7 :21 ; 61
:16 ; 87 :16
--------------------------
56 :10,11 ; 58 :2,24 ; 59 :18;
assisted 10 :16,17
bearing 54 :3
C.S .R 1 :10
62 :12,17,21 ; 63 :6; 64 :7;
associated 56 :7
became 7 :16 ;
20 :4,5,20 ;
calculate 61 .12
67 :21 ;
69 :6 ; 70 :5,9,22 ;
Associates 28:5
26
:10,11
; 54:10
call 20 :18
; 22 :11 ; 32:12 ;
71 :8,9; 72 :8 ; 74:17 ;
assume 10:5 ; 29
:18
; 37 :13 ; becmrn 6:14
; 22 :5 ; 26 :9 ;
51 :11
; 65 :20 ; 76
:11 ;
88
:20 ; 89 :7,9,11,17 ;
38:14 ; 40:20 ; 41 :1 ; 42 :5 ;
92:20
78 :16 ; 102 :23
96 :19 ; 97 :2 ; 105 :6
45 :16 ; 52:5 ; 61 :11
; 63
:4 becomes 35 :6 ; 36 :6
called 11 :3 ; 22 :14 ; 49:3, civil 6:7
assumed 53:9 ; 75 :20
began 88:2
4 ; 60 :15 ; 99:19
claim 24:7
assumes 56:18 ;
57:15
begin 11 :2 ; 56:23 ; 93:12
calls 91 :9
clarify 6:4
; 87:4
assuming 38:10 ; 60 :13 ;
beginning 5
:24 ; 7 :15 ;
came 77 :16 ; 85 :10 ; 91 :20
CLARISSA 2;1 .5 ; 24 :19
82 :19 ; 94:8,9
11 :2
; 85 :18,24 ; 86:26 ;
cannot 49:13 ; 96 :12
Class 42 :15
assumption 56:18
; 82:22 ;
90 :1
cap 15 :2,11
; 45 :16
; 55 :3, clay 54 :18 ; 55 :7
84 :17 ; 94 :13
behalf 1 :20,24 ; 2:3.5,8 ;
6 ; 85
:16
CLC
20
:17
; 58:8,9 ; 75 :6
assumptions 79 :9 ; 84 :17
4 :14 ; 22 :3
capabilities 14 :7
clear 49 :9,21 ; 98 :1
assurance 10 :12,18,22 ;
behavior 35 :11
capability 35 :20 ; 57 :9 ;
clearly 13 :18 ; 67
:5 ; 68 :3 ;
11 :7,13,17,23 ; 12 :12 ;
behind 53 :3
75 :13
; 96 :15
98 :17
13 :5,14,23 ; 14 :12 ; 19 :19 ; belief 36.24 ; 54 :19 ; 68:16 capacity 21 :19 ; 34 :11 ;
client 7:20 ; 8 :19
; 10:18 ;
23 :26 ; 26:6 ; 29 :6,7,11 ;
believe 5 :11 ; 18:3 ; 32:7 ;
75 :5
104 :8
14 :4 ; 44:4; 62 :12
30 :1,4,6,10,12,14,17,22 ;
36 :14 ; 37 :3 ; 39 :5,15 ;
caption
close 14 :19 ; 15 :1 ; 16 :14,
31:6,8
; 32
:3 ; 33:3,7,23,
41 :6,10,23 ; 61 :24 ; 78:15 ; card 9:14
16 ; 36:9 ; 46 :16 ; 58:22 ;
24 ; 39 :10,13
; 40:21
;
81 :10
; 91 :15
cards 9
:13
70 :17 ; 74:21
; 92:13,21 ;
41 :12,17,22 ; 49 :1
; 57 :6 ;
below 14 :24 ; 39 :1 ; 52 :24
care 11 :9,15 ; 13 :15 ; 15 :7,
94 :7 ; 95 :22
63 :12,75,77,26 ; 65 :2 ;
beneath 39 :3
9,18
; 16 :17 ; 17:6 ; 23 :19, closed 15 :8 ; 16:8,12 ;
78 :9 ; 81 :18
besides 13
:8 ; 59 :18
23 ; 25 :24
; 30 :10 ; 32 :8 ;
53 :15
assurances 33 :21
beat 14
:1 ; 33:17 ; 42 :15 ;
39 :16 ; 49:6 ; 51 :1 ; 61 :9, closely 12:16 ; 13 :3 ; 92 .11
assure 63
;7 ; 71
:4,6
44 :3 ; 73 :10 ; 75:14
;
13,15 ; 62:3,19
; 63 :3,4 ;
closer 15
:22
attach 24 :23
; 102 :11
84 :14 ; 88 :14
76 :17 ; 100:4
closing 59 :23 ; 60 :1,8 ;
attached 23 :13
; 25 :21 ;
better 20:17 ; 22:16
;
case 3 :9 ; 4:10
; 8 :23,24 ;
61
:2 ; 75:18,20,21
40 :11
33 :13 ; 42 :9 ; 46:13 ;
9:2 ; 12:14 ; 14 :21 ; 17x3;-
-closure
2:21,22,23 .5 ;
attachment 23 :11 ; 25 :24 ;
47 :20
; 70 :10
24
; 18 :5 ; 19 :4,10 ; 22 :6,
11
:8,15 ; 13 :15 ; 14
:17,20
;
29
:12
between 52 :21 ; 53 :4 ;
10 ; 35 :7,14
; 36
:21 ; 40 :6 ; 15 :9,17,19,20,23
; 16 :1,5,
attempt 78
:6
67
:11 ; 73 :11 ; 89 :15
67 :4 ; 98 :5 ; 101 :16,23
13,16,18,19,21 ; 17
:5,6,
attempted 78 :11
beyond 20:8 ; 49:19 ; 89 :15 cases 3 :17 ; 4 :14 ; 96
:10
17 ; 23 :23 ; 29 :23 ; 30 :9 ;

 
0 ,9-G2_gd Deposition of Devin Moose
41717 ; 32 :23 ; 33 :23 ;
36:6 ; 37:12 ; 45:23
; 67:3 ;
60 :7 .'15 .19,22 ; 61 :23 ;
0
18 . Y .; i3 :24, 45 8, 10,
i
11 ; oil :
17 ; 70:2 :
75 :22; 76 :5 ; 77 :3,5,9,12;
78 :10,17 ; 79 :3,5 ; 80 :7 ;
84:5
; 87:2
; 93:6 ; 94:5
;
100 :4 ; 102 :12,15,18,24
;
103 :13
closure/post 69 :13
co-issued 67 :10
coal 42:14 ; 53 :24 ; 54:1,2,
3,4,9,20
; 79
:22
cocoon 48 :7
collecting 43
:2,4
; 46 :18 ;
47:23 ; 48:1 ; 50 :6
collection 43 :3 ; 45 :8,10 ;
49 :23 ; 50 :10 ; 72 :7,10,17,
23 ; 73 :14,23 ; 74 :19 ;
81 :3,8 ; 82 :2 ; 85 :11,12 ;
88 :13
college 6 :2
come 4 :20 ; 15 :3,5,6 ; 16:5 ;
17 :1 ; 40 :12 ; 50:13
;
59 :16,22,24 ; 60 :21,23 ;
76:19 ; 89 :9 ; 94 :7 ; 99:20
comes 5:4; 37:10 ; 45 :20 ;
coming
92 :23
11 :24 ; 13 :24 ;
14 :11,14 ; 15 :23 ; 56 :8;
57 :24 ; 78:5
commencement 104 :5 .5
commencing 1 :15
commenting 8
:17,20
; 10 :5
common 50 :13 ; 52:14 ; 53 :1 ;
64 :16
COMMUNITY 1 :5 ; Z:3 .5 ;
17:23 ; 18 :1 ; 19:20,22 ;
20 :2,6,14 ; 21 :20,24 ;
22:4,7,9 ; 27 :10 ; 30 :18
;
69:18 ; 70:4 ; 89 :5 ; 105 :5
camp 12 :19,20 .
compacted 54
:18 ; 55 :7
companies 13 :8
company 1 :5 ; 2:4 ; 12:9
;
18:2 ; 21 ;3,9
; 22 :18 ;
27:10 ; 89:6 ; 105 :5
compare 58 :20 ; 83 :24
compared 71 :2
CompLainant 1 :3,20 ; 105 .3
complete 26 :13 ; 80 :12 ;
81 :2; 83 :17 ; 85 :19,20 ;
105 :14
completed 70 .15,19
completely 29 :7 ; 34 :19 ;
57:3
; 60
:17
completion 77 :19 ; 81 :21
compliance 11 :13 ; 20 :21
;
38 :12
; 99
:18
compliant 14 :2
; 51 :13
complying 78 :7
component 34 :2 ; 35 :19 ;
39:12 ; 41 :11
components 39 :2
compounding 36 :24
comprehensive 49 :24
; 73 :3,
9
; 76:9
comprehensively 81 :16
computer 35
:4
concern
74 :72
; 96 :20
concerned 25 :3 ; 44 :4 ;
90 :9 ; 96 :24
concerns - 75•: ZO 28 -:15 -
conclusion 28 ;14 ; 55 :22
;
77:14 ; 95:14 ; 97:13
conclusions 50 :3 ; 75 :17 ;
76 :20 ; 77:14
condition 29 :18,19
canlitjons 35 :20
; 36 :9,15 ;
37 :2 ; 67:20
conduct 81
:70 ; 91 :5,6
conducted ,2 :20 ; 34 :5
cone 43
:1!;
confident 54 :16
confirm 54
:12
conform 66 :4,19
conformance 60 :9 ; 64 :2
confused 50 :9
; 94
:3
Congress 52 :20,22
congruent 65 :18
connected 76 :12
Connecticut 8
:2
consent 17 :11
consider 36
:5
consistent 44 :23 ; 49 :10 ;
79 :10 ; 98 :19
consisting 105 :12
constituents 79 :23,24
constitute 26 .24
constitutes 92
:17
construct 83 :19 ; 85 :12
constructability 7 :17
constructed 16 :8
; 54 :23
;
72 :11 ; 73 :2,4,7,11,24
constructing 7 :23
construction 7 :22 ; 11 :5 ;
15:5 ; 50:2 ; 81:18 ; 83 :6,
22 ; 85 :12 ; 88 :15,19 ;
89 :10,11
; 101 :19,20,21
consult 12 :13
consultants 14 ;7
consulting 13 :22; 14 :4,6
contact 51 :7
contained 31 :18 ; 32
:24 ;
33 :3
; 72 :3
contaminants 96 :1,3
contaminated 51 :9
contemplating 84 :9
content 87:19,20
continually 79 :7
continue 85 :21
continued 8 :10
continuing 7
:1 ; 74
:23 ;
75 :3,8,19
contouring 26 :3
contours 15:1 ; 83 :5
contract 58 :9
; 68
:12,16 ;
89 :14,22
contracted 58 :6,7 ; 67 :5
contractor's 73
:17
contracts 68 :14
contractual 75 :13
control 1 :1 ; 3 :19,23 ;
18:8; 19:15
; 29
:1 ; 84
:9,
15
; 97:1 ; 105 :1
Conversely 55 :6
converted 8 :13
Cook 8 :22
coordinated 30
:15
copies 24:11 ; 25:4 ; 69:5 ;
100 :9,11,13
copy 24:20,21
; 32
:7
;
71
:18 ; 81 :10 ; 100:7
corporation 1 :5 .5,6 .5 ;
105 :5 .5,6 .5
corporations 21 :5
correct 3:22
; 5 :12 ; 16 :13 ;
30
:9 ; 46:5 ; 50 :12 ; 62 :2,
4; 67:1,21 ; 77:21 ; 78:4 ;
88:6
; 104:11 .5 ; 105 :14
corrective 29:23
-
cost 2 :21,22
; 11 :3,4,6,12 ;
12 :1,4,11 ; 13 :9,16,24 ;
14 :11,14,17
; 15 :4,5,12,
17,19,22 ; 16 :1,5,13 .17 ;
29:20,22 ; 32 :8 ; 33:9 ;
37:13
; 39
:16
; 40 :10 ;
41 :19,22 ; 42 :1,6 ; 43 :5 ;
curious 24
:9 ; 74:5
current 32
:2
; 39:16 ;
50 :15,17 ; 51 :4 ; 63 :11 ;
17
; 71 :16
dates 18 :21 ; 19:12
day 6 :23 ; 20:12 ; 35 :12;
23 :12 ; 26:8,10 ; 27:7
decide 19 :16
; 44 :1
decided 84
:15 ; 93
:2
; 97 :15
decision 57 :17,22 ; 67 :14 ;
97 :1,7
.
decisions 37 :8 ; 43 :22 ;
93
:10
decree 17 :11
DEE 1 :9 ; 2:13.5 ; 3:2 ;
Page 3
106 :5 .5
; 105
:9,16 .5
deep 46 :23 ; 82 :10,11
defaulted 36 :19
; 92 :1 ;
4 ; 98:3
details 60 :5
determinations 98 :15
differently 57 :10 ; 95 :19,
29
dig 64 :21
director 9 :14,16,20
dirt 86 :7
disagree 34 :3
disagreed 64 :1
- disagreeing 34 :1
disclosed 25 :14
disclosure 62 :8 ; 69 :11 ;
98 :1
discuss 62
:6 ; 63 :8 ; 97:12
45 :23 1.8 :3 : 55 .: 18,19,23 ;
56
:12 ; 57:2 ; 58:1 ; 59:17,
95 :9
define 46
:14 ; 55 :3
22 ; 60 :1,8,14 ; 61 :2,4 ;
definitely 97
:7
7490:22:11
;
; .
9477:9,16:5 ; 102
; 83:12,15:14 ;
degrade
defused 5147:16:7
cost/benefit 75
:15
costly 14 :19
degree 5 :18 ; 6
:4,6
;
degrees 43 :17
71
:6
costs 11 :5 ; 12 :17 ; 15 :10, delegates 68 :13
24 ; 17:6,17
; 51 :1
; 58:23 ; deluded 51
:8
60 :19,24 ; 77 :3,5,12 ;
delved 8 :8
80 :21 ; 81 :20
demonstrate 47:19 ; 81 :21 ;
couldn't 88 :1
93 :4,14
Counter 34 :23
denial 64 :14,16,22
counties 4 :18
;
5 :5
denied 90:6
county 1
:11 ; 8
:22 ; 12 :24 ; depends 66 :14
--------------------------
D
damaged 78 :23 ; 79 :12
Danbury 8 :2
dewatering 7 :22
diagram 49 :22
; 99 :6
diagrams 73 :3
difference 39 :5 ; 45 :15 ;
52:21 ; 53
:4
data 50 :2 ; 54 :21 ; 71 :3,22, different 5 :7 ; 6 :23 ; 13:1,
23
17,20 ; 31
:11 ; 43:21 ;
date 23:9
48:16 ; 52:23 ; 60:4 ; 68:6;
dated 2 :24 ; 22 :20 ; 23 :12,
80 :18 ; 95:18 ; 100:3
20:19 ; 21 :11 ; 31:3 ;
104
:2,4 .5,20
couple 34 :3,6 ; 69 :4
;
74:13 ; 99
:4
deposition 1 :9 ; 3 :10
;
6 :23 ; 24 :18 ; 100:21 ;
102 :13 ; 103 :2,4,14,23 ;
104
:7 .5
; 105 :11,14
cover 23
:20 ; 24 :4,6,13 ;
depression 43
:15
26:3 ; 75 :23 ; 76 :15 ; 82:6, depth 51 :15 ; 71 :1,2
8,13,18,21,24 ; 83 :2,6,8, describe 7 :12 ; 10 :21 ;
14 ; 88:20 ; 90:11
; 96:2
25 :13
; 46:19 ; 72:16 ;
create 43 :15 ; 44:20 ; 52 :22
creates 102 :3
creating 51 :23
102 :22
describing 45 :3
DESCRIPTION 2 :17 .5
credit 58 :13
design 35 :9 ; 43:13 ; 44 :11 ;
criteria 95 :7
49 :15,24 ; 82 :18
; 83 :2,3,
critical 29 :3 ; 74 :18
17 ; 85 :16
cross 99
:15 .
crust 99 :14
cubic 40 :9,11,14 ; 41 :2,9
designed 95
:20
designing 14 :20
desire 52 :10
CULBERTSON 2 :5 ; 23 :13
detail 69:21
; 73 :6; 74:2,
64:12 ; 73 :1 ; 78 :13 ;
79:20 ; 81
:7
; 91 :9
develop 11 :4; 15 :2,12 ;
33:9 ; 35:3 ; 81:3 ; 101 :21
currently 4 :18; 9 :3,24 ;
49:6; 50 :5,24
; 52:4 ;
developed 4 :23 ; 64
;23 ;
69 :16 ; 74,20 ; 76
:5,21
57:1
; 63
:21 ; 64
:14 ;
developer 12 :22
78 :12 ; 81
:11 ; 100 :12
developing 11 :12 ; 12 :4;
curriculum 2 :18 ; 5 :12
21 :14
curve 84 :19
customer 20 :16
development 8 :16,20
; 9
:23 ;
17 :14 ; 42
:19
customers 53 :11
CUTLER 2 :1 .5
device 84
:9
DEVIN 1
:9 ; 2:13.5 ; 3:2 ;
CV 5 :12
104 :5 ; 105 :9,16 .5
104 :16
dilemma 24 ;6
deal 76 :21 ; 89 :21
dimensions 47 :9
; 99
:22,24
dealing 13 :19
debate 92 :9
debt 12 :16
Diplomat 6 :9
direct 21 :6
direction 37 :23
December 22 :10,21,22 ;
directly 56 :15

 
Page 1
.
3
4
:11 ; 35 .9 ;
52
:23 ;
53 :10
; 85 .1i
;
57 :1,2 ; 70 :18,
72 :'
r 4 : 1 CI
75
:18,20,22 ; '0 :2,6 ;
81
:4,17 ; 82:14 ; 92 :21
;
93:5,15
; 94 :10,14 ; 95 :21,
23 ; 96
:1,2,4,13,17 ; 100 :8
fact 28 :23 ; 31
:22 ; 33 :13 ;
54
:12 ; 67 :16 ; 97:4
factor 37:22 ; 383
; 74 :18
factors 86
:5 ; 98 :12,14, .18
facts 45
:19 ; 56 :18 ; 57:15 ;
95 :22 ; 96 :23 ; 97:2,12,23
;
98 :15
failed 34
:15 ; 35 :17; 94 :16
failure 19
:19 ; 23 :18 ;
25 :22 ; 30 :3
fair 13 :13 ; 51 :10 ; 95 :13
fairly 14 :16 ; 54 :5 ; 82:10,
13,24
; 94:5
fall 85 :18,24 ; 86
:2,9,24
familiar 10
:6,12
;17
:23 ;
19:22; 30:13 ; 63:10
familiarity 20
;2
; 30 :20
far 4 :20 ; 12
:12 ; 13 :15 ;
16!23
; 22:3 ; 24:2 ; 31 :3 ;
33 :20
; 41
:9,21 ; 43:11
;
44
:4,8 ; 46 :12; 47:24 ;
50
:5
; 54 :7; 61 :13
; 62 :9,
20 ; 63:3 ; 65:21,22 ;
66:12 ; 72:2 ; 78:18
; 90 :9,
13
fast 90 :23
favor 18 :8
feasible 97
:27
features 96 :4
February 57:18
Federal 93 :3
feeling 29
:5
feet 26:20,22
; 27:1 ; 36:4 ;
43 :19 ; 44 :9,10 ; 47 :8,21 ;
49:19 : 82
:16 ; 93:7 ; 99 :17
fell 76 :5
few 65 :17
Fifth 1 :13
fifty 12
:15
figure 40
:10 ; 50:23 ; 73:4
;
81 :14
; 85 :17; 86:10
figured 87 :24
figures 100 :6
file 26
:12,13,24 ; 28 :12 ;
31 :14 ; 32:20
; 64 :5
filed 21 :23 ; 27:4 ; 30
:8 ;
64 :7,10
files 26 :24; 27 :2,3
fill 8:3 ; 34:16
filled 54 :23
final 16
:18 ; 23 :20 ; 75 :23 ;
76 :15 ; 82 :6; 83
:3,6,8,14 ;
84:6 ; 90 :11
financial 10
:12,18,22 ;
11 :1,2,7,13,17,22 ; 12 .8,
10,12,13
; 13 :4,5,14,23 ;
14 :12 ; 16 :10 ; 19:19
;
23:23 ; 26:6
; 29:6,11 ;
30
:1,4,5,10,12,14,17,21 ;
31 :6,8 ; 32 :3 ; 33:2,7,21,
23,24 ; 39 :9,13 ; 40:21 ;
41 :11,16,22 ; 49 :1 ; 57:5,
7 ; 63 :11,15,17,24 ; 65
:2 ;
78 :9
financing 13 :1,2 ; 62 :11
find 24:19 ; 39 :17,23 ;
40 :7 ; 59 :12
findings 85 :10
fine 20 :11 ; 05 :8
finished 102 :10
08-12-06 Depositior, of Uevin Moose
d s awed 62:13 63-5 ;
90
.0, 'I03 x3,'14,15,20
11 is licging 55
:15
d l 13:2
:,ei 7
:13 ;
43;12 ; 53 :8
dispose 75
:8
disposed 55 :9 ; 94 :14
dispute 41 :8
disputes 5 :7
dissolved 46 ;17
distance 51 :15
divergence 73 :13
document 71 :15 ; 100:22 ;
102 :21
documents 49 :9
; 70
:13
dog 35 :7
doing 21
:18
; 28 :23 ; 31 :3 ;
33 :17; 52:13,17 ; 61 :19 ;
62:21 ; 86:8 ; 88 :22 ; .
~
Icr
.41 ;
16- :5:'9 ;
45:23
20
-n-s 33:24 ; :1
:^2
ploycd 4 :18
; 9 :3 ; 20 :15
esn:,loyees
9 :18 ; 88 :20
erdeuvor 78 :15
ended 26:19 ; 103 :23
energy 65 :1
enforce 98 :7
enforcement 4
:2
Enforcement-Land 1 :4 .5
;
105 :4 .5
engine 93 :19
engineer 5 :23 ; 6 :8,15,18 ;
12
:3,5,6 ; 13:23
; 14 :4,20
;
35 :2,5,17,18 ; 36 :12 ;
42:4 ; 66 :1
; 98 :19
engineer's 11 :3,4,6 ;
e~ .1ua,-n3
'
83 :16
_.v f
.Vat :n
0 :1r- 71 :16 ;
84 :1'
LIE3
`c11
IS
:
96
:1
events 85 :15
eventually 28 :14
; 101 :2
everybody 14 :14 ; 24 :7 ;
41 :5,7
everything 16 :20 ; 47 :15
ovidence 54
:21
; 56 :19
;
57:15 ; 73:8
; 74 :10 ;
81 :11 ; 02 :9 ; 91 :16,19 ;
92 :18,23
evolution 92 :7
exactly 20
:9 ; 27:20 ;
92 :16 ; 99 :16
examination 2 :13 ; 3 :5 ;
6 :19,21
; 99 :2 ; 104 :6
examined 3 :3
98 :16,18 ; 101 :14
dollar 65 :4 ; 77:16 ; 81 :13
dollars 12 :15 ; 33 :22 ;
41
:18 ; 42 :7,9 ; 50:20 ;
61
:5 ; 62
:1,11,12,18,21 ;
63 :4,7,13,22
; 77:4,9 ;
79:17; 83 :8,9 ; 86 :2
done 12 :4; 17:8,10,20 ;
20
:3 ; 23:2; 29:2
; 41 :2 ;
45:20 ; 46:9 ; 61 :15 ; 62:8,
12 :11 ; 13:9
; 33 :9
; 66:12
engineered 15 :2
; 54 :18,24
engineering 5 :21
; 6
:5,7,
11 ; 7:3 ; 8:10,13,14 ;
12 :1 ; 27:14,15,16 ; 33 :12 ;
67:7 ; 93:20
engineers 6 :10
; 14 :6
;
27:9 ; 66 :4
enough 34 :13
; 46
:16 ; 98:1
entails 6 :16
example 4 :4 ; 12 :14 ; 17:13 ;
37 :15 ; 39:11 ; 40
:22 ;
41 :15 ; 78 :13 ; 80:22 ;
89:17 ; 93:10 ; 97:2
examples 34
:3,6
excavation 14
:24
exceed 79 :24
exceeded 58 :8
excess 29 :20 ; 33
:21 ;
34 :16 ; 41 :17
9 ; 69
:17
; 70
:3
; 71 :24
;
76:20 ; 77:15 ; 78:19 ;
80 :18 ; 81 :22 ; 87:3,4,5,
23 ; 88 :14,15 ; 101 :3
double 5 :20
doubt 54 :16
down 13 :17 ; 27:12 ; 46 :15 ;
53 :15 ; 59:9 ; 60 :3 ; 77:10 ;
78 :3 ; 80 :1
enter 76
:24
entering 88 :22
enters 51 :8
entire 38
;4
; 58
:10
; 90
:17
entity 20 :23 ; 68 :13,14
Envlrogen 9
:10 ; 10 :16
environment 44 :4
; 57 :4 ;
65:22 ; 96:3
envirortnental 1 :12,21 ;
excessive 39
:11
executed 68 :12
exercise 21 :15 ; 38 :8 ;
95 :23
exhibit 5 :8,11 ; 24 :24 ;
25 :7,10
; 28:17
; 68 :24 ;
69 :7; 100 :7 ; 102 :8,11,13,
14,17; 103 :9,12
exhibits 2
:16 .5 ; 69 :4,5 ;
downhill 84 :18
dozen 52,1T
dozens 5 :6
draw 99 :6
drink 96 :21
drove 33 :17
duty 3 :3 ; 104 :6
dunped 53 :17
dumping 42
:14 ; 53 :79,22,
23 ; 79
:23
during 21 :24
; 80 :7
;
101 :15 ; 102:13 ; 103 :2,14
---- -__-------------------
E
--------------------------
each 4:10 ; 13:10 ; 70 :24 ;
73 :4 ; 80 :21,22 ; 81 :21 ;
100 :13
earlier 19
:11,12 ; 27 :5 ;
2 :10 .5,23 ; 4 :3 ; 6 :10 ;
8
:13,14
; 9
:4,15,19,21 ;
10 :9 ; 21
:3
; 22 :17,19 ;
27:16 ; 66 :5 ; 71 :24 ;
102 :21
EPA 1
:24 ; 14
;13 ; 16 :23 ;
17 ;3 ; 27:3
; 30:15
; 65 :23 ;
68:18 ; 77:12 ; 96:9
ergo 40 :12
erosion 15:10 ; 26 :4 ; 29
:1 ;
82 :10,11
especially 45 :16
; 62
:14
essence 94 :4
essentially 11 :14 ; 69 :20 ;
94 :21
establish 79 :19 ; 86:3
established 86 :4
estimate 2 :21,22
; 11 :3,4,
6,12 ; 12
;1,4,11 ; 13 :9
;
102
:11
exhumation 40 :10
exhume 101 :12
exhuming 39 :6 ; 101
:9
existence 96 :18
existing 42 :13
; 71 :3 ;
78 :7
; 79 :15 ; 82:16
;
loo :x,10
expand 78 :21
expending 9
:23
expending 96 :11
expensive 16 :2
experience 5 :15 ; 6 :17 ;
10 :17,21,24
; 13
:19,22 ;
14
:10 ; 36
:18 ; 49:11 ;
59 :6
; 84 :2
experiencelsic .l 11 :1
expert 4 :23 ; 5 :1
expertise 6 :20 ; 14 :7
65
:14
; 70:14 ; 93 :22
14 :1,11,14,18 ; 15:12,18, explain 6 :12 ; 36:1
; 87 :11,
early 7
:15,19,24 ; 14 :23 ;
19,22
; 16 :1,5 ; 29 :7,20
;
12
86;5
33 :9 ; 40 :9 ; 48:3 ; 55 :17,
explained 73 :5
earth 83 :7 ; 86 :19
22 ; 56 :8 ; 57 :2,13,24
;
expose 101 :18
east 74 :12 ; 84:19
59:16,24 ; 60 :8 ; 77:5,8,
exposure 39 :3
economic 54 :4,8
17,20
; 80
:11,12 ; 83 ;14
;
extensive 6 :19 ; 7 :19
economical 96 :11
91 :12 ; 102 :12,15
extract 81 :4,16
economist 13 :18
edge 99 :17
estimated 15 :5 ; 34 :4 ;
55 :17 ; 59
:22
; 60:1 ; 61
;2
extraction 54 :9 ; 73 :16,22
extremely 25 :3
education 5
:15,17 ; 7
:1
estimates 11 :14 ; 13 :16 ;
- ---------------------
educational 8 :9
14 :22 ; 15 :4 ; 16 :13 ; 22 :7 ;
F
effect 42
:3 ; 92 :11
29 :22
; 30 :12
; 32 :8 ;
----------------- ----- -
effective 43 :2
37 :13 ; 39
:17 ; 41 :19
F-C-I 27:4
effectiveness 72 :7
efficient-44 :2
-
estimating 13 :9 ; 17 :17
evaluate 23:3 ; 70 :23 ;
facilities 3 :24 ; 7:14 ;
12:18 ; 15 :3 ; 16:8 ; 21 :5,
efficiently 81 :16
72:6 ; 75 :11,12,13,14 ;
7 ;
52 :11,12 ; 92 :16 ; 97;4,
eight 3 :13 ; 6:16
; 10
:1 ;
82
:2n
10
52 :18
evaluated 88 :12
facility 14 :21 ; 15 :2,7 ;
eighteen 21
:15
evaluates 72 :10
16 :15 ; 20 :13,20 ; 21 :1 ;

 
OP, C 2-108 Deposition of Devin Noose
firm 27:14,15
first 3 :3,9 ; 6:1 ; 15 :17 ;
18 :11 ; 20 :4,5 ; 38 :9 ;
39 :11 ; 44 :8
; 66 :2 ; 70 :6,
15
; 74 :13
; 84:10 ; 96 :7 ;
102 :15
five 59 :8 ; 76:6 ; 77:15,19,
23,24 ; 78:20 ; 100 :19
flare 84 :24
Floor 1 :18 .5
flow 37:24 ; 43 :16 ; 44 :17
flowing 44 :21 ; 45 :7
focus
flows
537:20:17; 9:18 ; 74:17 ;
97 :21
focused 37:8 ; 63 :16
focuses 8 :14
focusing 96
:23
FOI'd Z7 :4
folders 26 :24
follow 66:22
; 67:1
following 99 :24
follows 3 :4
foot 26 :23 ; 48 :11,14 ;
51 :18 ; 95 :7
footprint .38 :22,24 ; 39 :2,
4; 84:5 ; 93:7
foregoing 104 :10 .5,11 ;
105 :10
forest 93 :11
forgot 19 .7
forgotten 96 :12
form 56 :17 ; 66 :9;' 76 :15 ;
82 :6 ; 83 :3
forma 13 :10 ; 84:23 -
formally 53 :16
forth 7
:24 ; 73:12,21 ;
81 :9 ; 91 :24
forties 53
;20
forty 37
:22
forward 14 :16 ; 69 :14
found 18:8 ; 78 :23 ; 87:24
four 29:12 ; 41 :2 ; 60;4 ;
71
:21 ; 78:3 ; 90:15
;
100 :13
Freedom 27 :5
Friday 18 :21
front 3119,20,22 ; 41 :14 ;
42:20 ; 64 :16 ; 67:4 ;'
`73 :19; 93 :9 ; 96 :24
full 75 :4
full-time 8 :13
functionality 72 :12
functioning 71 :2
functions 72 :12
funny 78 :2
FURTHER 104 :7
.5,10,13
- ----------------------
--------------------------G
gallon 58 :6,20 ; 59 :7,8,10,
14
gap 71
:23
garbage 53 :17; 54 :14 ;
101 :24
gas 23:23 ; 25
:23 ; 26 :5 ;
28:24
; 73 :16 ; 74 :8,11,19 ;
75
:24 ; 76
:16
; 83 :15,16,
17,18,19,20,21,22,24 ;
84 :8,10,12,13,14 ; 85
:21 ;
86 :9 ; 87 ;8,9,10,13,15,20 ;
88:4,8,10 ; 89 :18 ; 90 :12 ;
91
:6
gased 84:24 - - . -
gate 88 :22
gave 19
:11
general 1 :17,18 ; 20 :21,23 ;
47:2 ; 58 :19 ; 70 :2 ; 78
:20
General's 3 :9
generally 5 :16 ; 13 :3 ;
14:22 ; 25:13 ; 36 :2 ; 45
:5
;
58 : .1a;-
.72 :16 ; -74 ;3 . .
generate 15
:21
generated 30 :14,22
genres 11 :3
geologic 71 :3
geoLogical 5 :21 ; 8 :9
geotechnical 5
:21,23 ;
7 :18 ; 8 :10
gets 74 :1 ; 101 :4
getting 12 :8 ; 13 :5,20 ;
16:24 ; 33 :5 ; 69:21 ; 74
:2
give 24 :7,16 ; 34 :2,5 ;
36:23 ; 37:15 ; 49:17;
53:14 ; 55 :11 ; 58;13 ;
62 :6,24
; 68
:21 ; 72 :20
given 3:10 ; 71
:7 ; 105 :11,
15
giving 57:7 ; 90 :22
go-to 9 :22
got 8:4,6 ; 15 :14 ; 22 :11,
20
; 25
:10 ; 26 :7 ; 29
:15 ;
31 :20 ; 42 :13 ;..45 :18 ;
46:8
; 48:4 ; 56:23
; 58:8 ;
64:20
; 69;5
; 77:10 ;
78 :20 ; 79 :22 ; 80 :6 ;
81
:23
; 82 :3 ; 84:4,21 ;
85 :7,18 ; 86:8 ; 95 :15 ;
96 :14
gotten 15 :14 ; 35 :13
; 93:9
government 4
:12,15,17
governmental 10 :19
grade 15 :1
gradient 52 :23 ; 80 :1
grading 75 :23
Grand 1 :22
-grant 1 :17.5 ; 2 :15 ; 3 :6,7 ;
18
:19
; 19 :1,13,16
; 24 :9',
17,23; 25 :9 ; 39 :19,21,24 ;
40 :3,13,19 ; 55 :14 ; 57
:19
;
61 :22 ; 66:16
;
68:21 ;
69 :2
; 97 :11,14,24
; 98 ;10,
20,24 ; 100:14 ; 101 :4 ;
102 :10,20 ; 103 :1,8,11,18,
21
granted 71 :9
GRAYSON 2:9 .5,15 .5 ; 18:23 ;
24:11,21 ; 25 ;5 ; 99 :3 ;
100 :17 ; 101 :7 ; 102:5
great 25 :5 ; 65 :9 ; 100:14
greenfield 12 :21
grew 7:8
ground 33:18 ; 36:15 ; 39 :3 ;
45 :19
; 57:6 ; 86
:7 ; 99:23
groundwater 5 :22; 8 :7 ;
23:22 ; 26:5 ; 28:21,23 ;
34 :13,15,24 ; 35 :3,4 ;
36 :3,21 ; 37 :11,12,16
;
39 :1
; 41
:24 ; 42 :10,11,15,
17,21 ; 43 :6,8,9,16 ;
45 :14 ; 46 :4,10,12,22 ;
47
:4,11,23 ; 48
:7,9,11,14 ;
49 :2,17,18,20 ; 50 :6,10,
18,21 ; 51 :3,8,10,12,17 ;
53:1,5
; 55 :16 ; 76 :6,8,11 ;
78 :18,21 ; 79 :8,11,19,21 ;
'80 :3,5,6,8,17 ; 85 :20
;
86 :3,8 ; 87
:6,7
; 88 :10 ;
90 :10,18,24 ; 91 ;10,17,22 ;
92 :24 ; 93 :6,16,17 ; 94 :22
;
99:21 ; 100 :19
Grundy 20 :19 ; 21 :11 ; - 31 :3
- .
guarantees 11 :2
; 13 :3
guess 11 :11 ; 30 :8,11
;
31 :23
; 43:21 ; 50:8
; 52:9
;
54 :24 ; 73 :10
; 94;17
; 95 :7
gullies 26 :4 ; 82
:10,11
guys 68 :22 ; 101 :2
I
-------------------------
i .e . 74 :22
Page 5
9
:18 ;
1,7
; 12 :'7,24 ;
1L :13,17
;
6 :1t;
; '17 :3'
indicated 67 :14 ; 70 :5 ;
104
:9
individual 27 :18
HELSTEN 2
:5 .5
; 18:16 ;
19:10 ; 22 :12,20 ; 24 :4,13 ;
25 :1 ; 39:20
; 40:1,5,8,17
;
56:17 ; 57:14
; 61
:18 ;
66 :8 ; 97 :11,17; 98
:9,13
;
100 :23 .24 ; 102 :7; 103 :3,
6,19
hereby 104 :5
; 105
:9
implemented 33
:10 ; 69 :14 ;
76:23
; 87:7,9; 95:3
important 43 :23 ; 71 :10 ;
72:13 ; 79
:7
impracticable 59 :19 ; 60 :18
improper 33 :20
in-depth 13 :14
in-house 27 :4
hereunto 104 :15 .5
higher 6:13; 7:2 ; 33 :7;
inadequate 50
:1
inappropriate 38 :3
48 :13
Inc 102 :21
highest 74 :22
INC . 1 :5 .13 ; 2 :4 ; 105 :5
highly 80 :2
Hill 8:1
hinge 98 :15
HINSHAW 2 :5 ;-23 :12
historical 26
:20 ; 42
:14
incapable 42
:4
incentive 16 :10
incinerate 84
:24
include 4 :22
included 23
:14,18,22 ;
hiatory 79 :23
50:22
; 78
:16 ; 86 :3
hold 5 :14
honest 49
:8
includes 50 :18; 56 :1 ;
77:24 ; 78 :14 ; 83 :16
hope 34:7 ; 48:15
including 10:1
; 53:19
;
hopefully 44 :7
61 :7; 83 :10 ; 87:8 ; 90
:15
hour 1 :15
hours 85 :7
hundred 42 :1,8 ; 43 :5,19 ;
Inclusive 105
:12
income 96 :14
Incorporated 7 :20 ; 9 :4
44 :9,10 ; 46 :5 ; 47 :8,21 ;
incorrect 63 :14
48 :2,11,14 ; 49 :19 ; 51 :18 ; increase 78 :22 ; 101 :13
55 :20
; 86
:2 ; 91 :11,17,18
;
increased 8 :6 ; 38:24; 74 :1
92 :23 ; 93 :6,7,16; 95
:13 ;
increasing 8 :5 ; 38 :22 ;
99 .17
39 :4
hurdle 13
:21
hydrogeoLogie 35
:10
; 71 :3
hydrogeoLogical 8 :7
-------------------------
increasingly 7 :21
incrementally 74 :1
indeed 54 :11
INDEX 203,16 .5
-- --- - -----------
11
""""---
half 9
:8,11 ; 52
:17 ; 59
:7 ;
73 :24
hand 104 :16
handled 72 :15
hands 36 :19
happened 35 :8,13
happy 97
:14
23 :14 ; 27 : : ; 30:15
; 52:9,
12, . ;5
;
63:19 ;
. 7
5:92;21
:
;-&ca:10'
:
93 :1 ; 104 ;1,5 ; 105 :1,2,
5 .5,6
illogical 57 :3
imagine 99 :14
imediate 70
:6 ;-74
:13 ;
76 :1 ; 81 :12
impact 34 :13,15 ; 35 :3 ;
hate 87
:11
44 :3 ; 47 :3,14,16,20 ;
heading 30 :9
48 :13 ; 51 :18; 74 :22 ;
health 25:20 ; 29:5 ; 33 :11 ;
92 :24 ; 93 :5,15 ; 94 :22
;
34
:20 ; 38 :6,19
; 42:3 ;
99 .21
60 :18 ; 70
:7,11
; 74
:7,17 ;
impacted 46
:17; 47:12 ;
79 :9 ; 81 :12 ; 89 :1,3 ; 92:3 51 :10
hearing 18 :5,12 ; 19 :3,4,15 impacting 36 :3 ; 47 :18 ;
hearings 4 :8
49 :18
heart 97 :19
heavily 42 :12
height 34 :17
impacts 47:15 ; 71 :11
impermeable 54 :5
implement 15 :6
; 26 :18
;
help 7:22 ; 22:14 ; 34:24
helps 48
:15
46:1 ; 63 :16 ; 86:1
implementation 80 .16
idea 38 :11,14
; 40
:23 ;
43 :20 ; 62:24; 72:20
identification 5 :9
; 25 :8;
69 :1
; 71
:14
; 102:9 ;
103 :10
identified 5 :11
; 60
:12
individually 13 :12
inducing 44 :17
industrial 80 :2
industrialized 42 :12
industry 6 :24
information 27 :5 ; 28 :2 ;
identify 23
:9
; 73 :6 ; 83 :1 ;
74 :14 ; 92:18
84 :12 ; 88 :24
infrastructure 81 :15,24
IEPA 2:18.5 ; 15 :13 ; 28:15, initial 5 :1
22 ; 49 :12,17
; 79 :14 ;
initially 76 :23
81
:20 ; 87
:23
initiate 24 :15
IEPA's 94 :24
- initiated 70 :10
IL 1 :19,23 ; 2
:2 .5,7
innocuous 92 :20
ILLINOIS 1
;1,2,5
.5,6,12,
input 36 :13
13,17,21,24
; 2 :10
.5 ;
inputs 36 :6,8
4 :18,19 ; 6:8 ; 7:7; 8 :17 ;
insert 35:9

 
64 :15,24 ; 74 :5,7,79 ;
89 :1 ; 97 :16 ; 101 :10,11 ;
103 :19
items 100 :19
iterations 91
:24
itself 46 :16 ; 87:20
IV 42
:15
-
-
92 :18,20
large 13
:7 ; 21 :4 ; 90:15
Largest 44:3
; 45 :22
LaROSE 2 :1
LaSalle 2 :2 ; 12:24
last 18 :20,21 ; 29 :14 ;
30
:7
; 37 :20 ; 41 :2 ; 71 :22
late 8:11 ; 20 :18
later 24 :20
tatersl 38 :21
letter 100 :20
Isw 3 :21 ; 67 :6
lawsuit 4 :16
lay 86:23
layer 54 :2
leachate 23 :22 ; 26 :4 ;
28 :18,20 ; 36 :22 ; 37:9,11 ;
42 :24
; 43 :3,4
; 44:21 ;
45
:4,5,7,8,10,11,17,20,
22 ; 46 :9,13,14,20
; 47 :13 ;
48 :1,6,19 ; 50
:11,18 ;
51
:3,6,7,11,12
; 52 :1,24 ;
53 :4 ; 55 ;16,19,23,24 ;
56 :5,6,13 ; 57:1 ; 58:1,3,
11,17 ; 59 :1 ; 69 :24
; 72:6,
10,14,16,23 ; 73 :14,15,18 ;
74 :19 ; 75 :24 ; 76
:10,14 ;
80 :23 ; 81 :2,4,7,17,24 ;
85 :11,12,20 ; 88 :12 ;
90 :11,19 ; 91
:5,10,18
;
95 :13 ; 96 :15 ; 100 :20 ;
101 :19,22
Leeched 72 :15
lease 89 :22,24
least 26 :17 ; 53 :7; 63
:22 ;
74 :22 ; 76:22 ; 92 :13 ;
102 :1
left 27:20,21 ; 54:7
legal 67:22 ; 68 :19 ; 97:7,
13
Legally 64 :2 ; 94 :9
Legitimately 98 :11
tend 86 :16,17
length 27 :1
less 49 :9 ; 58 :21 ; 59:8,14;
73 :9
letter 22 :20 ; 23:12 ; 24:2,
5,6,8,13,16 ; 26 :7 ; 64 :14,
20,22
Letters 64 :16
Level 6
:9,13 ; 7:2
; 47:16,
19 ; 48 :13 ; 52:24
; 53 :1 ;
80 :23
liability 18
:7
liberty 20:8 ; 32:7
lies 54 :2
life 7:9 ; 14 :23 ; 79 :16
limited 52 :1
Limiting 101 :17
Linda 1 :10 ; 104 :3,5,18.5
line 2:14 .5,17.5 ; 56:24 ;
73 :19 ; 99 :22
liner 53 :21 ; 54 :18,19,22,
24 ; 55:2,3,5,8 ; 99 :15
Liners 7 :23
lines 8:12 ; 21 :16
liquid 50 :14 ; 51 :6
list 23 :21
listed 78 :10
listening 94 :20
Lists 67
:12
Little 11 :10 ; 17:21 ; 20:1 ;
35 :6 ; 43 :7,13 ; 55 :12 ;
60 :10 ; 85;2 ; 90 :3,17 ;
91
:8 ; 93 :9
lived 7:8
LLF 2:5
load 94 :11
Loading 101
:24
Loral. 54 :11,12
ideated 70 :24
logical 86
:19
tong 6:23 ; 9:6 ; 21 :11 ;
72:19 ; 79:23 ; 80 :11 ;
85 :9,11,14 ; 92 :16
Vase 6
t<m!3
-
e .~ o 45 .5
Longer 36 :8
; 92
:14
Soak 21 :5,23 ; 23 :13,16 ;
24:1,2 ; 25 :'16,17 ; :11
:21 ;
36:13 ; 38:4 ; 39 :2 : 43 :21 ;
59 :3 ; 74:7 ; 75:7 ; 76:1 ;
88 :23 ; 91 :23 ; 95
:4 ;
96 :16,18,19
; 97 :22 ; 99 :16
looked 21
:6 ; 50 :16 ; 59 :5 ;
70 :23 ; 74
:13 ; 75:2 ;
82 :15 ; 87:24
looking 14 :1 ; 20 :3 ; 32:20 ;
49 :10 ; 69 :7 ; 74 :4 ; 86:23 ;
100 :5
Looks 99 :16
lost 35 :13 ; 93
:11
lot 7:6 ; 13:19 ; 21 :4 ;
28:2 ; 36 :23 ; 52:19 ;
69:21 ; 84 :3 ; 85 :6 ; 92 :9 ;
95 :18 ; 96 :10
Low 59
:7
; 94:5
LTD 2:1
--------------------------
--------------------------M
mad 85 :2,6
made 28:14 ; 56:19 ; 84:17
magic 9Z :9
maintain 7 :2 ; 15 :9 ; 92 :12
maintenance 23 :19 ; 82 :12 ;
90 :16,24
major 5:20 ; 89
:12
man 27:18
management 7:20 ; 56 :1 ;
76 :10,14 ; 79 :19 ; 80
:5,24
;
83 :4,6,15,17,18,19 ; 84 :1,
B ; 86 :3 ; 90
:11,19 ; 91 :5,
7; 100 :20
manager 9:1 ; 27 :18
managing 96 :5
manholes 73 :16
manifolds 73 :17
manmade 54 :18
manner 74 :22
many 3 :12 ; 4 :17; 36:24 ;
52:11 ; 93 :1
mark 100 :7
marked 5 :8,10 ; 25 :7,10 ;
68 :24 ; 102 :8 ; 103:9
marking 99 .12
mass 51 :9
material 67 :16 ; 101 :19,20
materially 47 :16
materials 26 :4; 34 :4
math 40:17; 61 :19
matrix 51 :17
matter 24:15 ; 31 :22 ; 46 :17
mayor 2Z:11 ; 24:14 ; 25 :2 ;
88 :21
McDermott 27 :19,22
McHenry 1 :11 ; 104 :2,4 .5,20
mean 11 :24 ; 16 :9,15,18 ;
24.17 ; 26 :22 ; 31 :9 ;
33:20 ; 42:1
; 44:9
; 45:4 ;
53 :13
; 55:2 ; 63 :20 ;
66 :21 ; 67:19 ; 69 :8 ; 75:9 ;
77:13 ; 79:7 ; 87:12 ; 92:5 ;
94
:22 ; 95 :24 ; 97:16 ; 98:7
meaning 93 :5
means 6:12 ; 35 :17
meant 35 :8,16 ; 54 :24
measurable 39 :5
; 42 :2
measurably 99 :21
measure 71 :12
measured 37 :19 ; 71 :1
measuring 42 :16
mechanism 12 :10 ; 84 :16
mechanisms 11 :17; 13 :17
(18-02-06 DaµsItIon of Devin Moose
inside 13 :Ii) -
inspection 2 :13 .5 : 22:13 ;
IX 29 : . 13,18
IX,'1 2') :18
23 : 1,5,15,17,20 ; 24 :3 ;
25 :11,1 .5,18 ; 29 :8,9 ;
70 :8; 88 :23
inspections 50 :16,23
I
January 27 :7,8
inspector 23 :15 ; 24 :10
inspectors 5 :1
instalL 83 :18 ; 89:18
installation 79 :2 ; 83 :18
installed 88 :16
Installing 51 :5
instance 38 :17
Job 6
:1 ; 9:17 ; 95:6
Joint 22 :11
jousting 90 :3
judge 3 :21
July 70 :15 ; 71 :8,16
June 97:19 ; 103 :16
jurisdiction 4 :21
instances 28 :75 ; 97
:20
- ------------------------ -
instead 63 :17
institution 12 :9 ; 13 :2 ;
------------------------K
-
57:7
keep 52:24 ; 87:11
institutions 12
:13 ; 13 :4,
20
keeping 24 :6
kept 18 :27
instructed 88 :23
kind 13 :6 ; 54 :10 ; 57:7 ;
instruction 101 :3
72 :22 ; 93 :11,18 ; 99 :8,9,
instrument 11 :22
13
insufficient 50 :2 ; 78 :24
integral 22 :2
intent 89 :13
kinds 53 :19
knowing 38 :17
knowledge 13 :14 ; 31 :5 ;
interact 16 :7
40 :6 ; 58 :16
interest 5
:6
interested 104 :14
known 20 :14
knows 82 :7,17
interesting 67:11 ; 92 :8
KOGLER 1 :21 .5 ; 18 :24
;
Interestingly 34
:12
100 :15
Interface 14 :13
internal 13 :10
interpret 43
:14 ; 57 :10
interpretation 33 :16
;
L
Lack 20 :17 ; 26:18 ; 47:20 ;
67 :17 ; 89
:14
73 :3 ; 82 :12
interpretations 56 :22
interpretive 64
:23
Lakes 5 :4,5
Lance 1 :10 ; 104:3 .5,18 .5
Interrogatories 2 :19 .5,
lend 2 :11 ; 5 :4
; 12 :19,20
;
23 ; 65 :15,22 ; 66 :5,19 ;
6,19 ; 74 :8,11 ; 76:16 ;
67.21 ; 77:4
79 :20
; 81 :8,15
; 83:15,19,
isolated 96 :3
21,22 ; 84 :10,12 ; 85:21 ;
issuance 30
:8
86 :10 ; 87 :8,9,13,15,16 ;
issue 12:18 ; 29 :4
; 31 ;4 ;
88:16 ; 89
:5,6
;
90 :12 ;
36:6; 38:21 ;
57:12 ;
91 :6 ; 92 :12 ; 94:12 ;
66 :14 ; 67:6 ; 82 :7,11 ;
99:14,15,20,24 ; 105 :5
89
:21,22,24 ; 90 :1 ;
93 :15 ; landfill's 14 :23
95 :2,4,8 ; 101 :13 ; 102 :3
landfills 7 :13,17,19 ; 8 :4,
issued 12 :15 ; 67:8 ; 68:18
;
15 ; 9 :23 ; 10:14,23
; 11 :8,
95:1
9 ; 13 :24 ; 16:11 ; 31 :1 ;
issues 5 :2,3 ;
7:22 ; 13 :3 ;
4Z
:13 ; 47:2 ; 52:8,15,16 ;
30 :5 ; 39
:7 ; 55 :16
; 60
:13 ;
58
:17 ; 60:9; 84:1,3 ;
20 .5 ; 69:10
76 :15 ; 80 :1 ; 82:6
; 83 :3 ;
interrogatory 69 :6,7,9,12
interrupt 35 :24
86 :23 ; 96:16
landfill 1 :5
; 2 :4,18 .5 ;
interrupting 87:12
4 :21,24 ; 5:2 ; 7:20 ; 8 :1,
intervals 82:24
2,16 ; 1008 ; 11 :5 ; 12 :21 ;
interviews 54 :11
14
:4,19 ; 16 ;19
; 17 :13,14,
intuitive 34 :23
23 ; 18 :1,2 ; 19 :20,23 ;
intuitive[sic .] 34 :20
20 :2,6,14 ; 21 :20,24 ;
invested 81 :15
22 :4,8,9,13 ; 23 :19 ;
investigate 22:15 ; 23 :1 ;
27:10 ; 30 :18 ; .31
:2,15 ;
74 :23
35 :11 ; 37 :18 ; 38
:1,22,23 ;
investment 81 :24
39
:10 ; 43 :9,16,17,19 ;
involved 5
:19 ; 7 :16,19 ;
8 :4,7,11,23 ; 10 :4 ;
44 :9,15,18,20 ; 45 :11,12,
12 :3 ;
15 ; 46 :10,11,24 ; 47 :22 ;
13:8
; 20 :5 ; 22 :5 ; 25 :15 ;
48 :6 ; 50:6 ; 51 :16
; 53 :7,
31 :24 ; 56:15
16
; 55
:7,19 ; 56:16 ;
involvement 7:12 ; 25
:2 ;
59:23 ; 60:2 ; 62:10 ;
37 :20
63 :21 ; 66 :4,13,17,20,22,
Inward 45 :7
24; 67
:2,9 ; 68:11 ; 69:18 ;
isn't 17:1 ; 24 :17 ; 45 :5,
70 :4,16 ; 71 :15,21 ; 72:4,

 
08-02-06 Depos1tlon_of
.Devir1 Mnose
13 ;
104 ;5 ; 105 :9,16,5
95 :12
nor 104 :13 .5,14
normalcy 14 :3,16 ; 16 :8 ;
17
:12
; 43 :17; 44:12
North 1tZ2
; . 2;2
-
nortlern 2 :22
notarial 104 :16
Notary 1
:10 ; 104
:4,5,20 ;
105 :20 .5
notes 104 :12
nothing 102 :7; 104 :6 .5
notified 22 :12
November 64 ;11
nuisance 102 :3
number 2:17.5 ; 5 :11 ;
15
:21 ; 17:2 ; 25
:10 ;
32 :11,17 ; 37:18,21 ; 59 :3,
4 ; 64 :1,3,4,6 ; 65 :2,4,15,
16 ; 67 :20 ; 69:7,8 ; 78 :22 ;
92:9 ; 102 :11
numbers 16 :24 ; 30 :22 ;
37:12 ; 76:13 ; 77:7;
83 :10 ; 90:22 ; 91 :20
numeral 29 :13,17
numerous 5 :2 ; 64 :15
---- ------------------
0
--------------------------
o'clock 1 :15
oath 105 :13
object 56:17 ; 57 :14 ; 66 :9 ;
97
:11
objection 56 :19 ; 66 :8
obligation 68 :18
; 98 :19
observations 90
:5
obtain 71 :4
obtained 74 :14
obtaining 10 :18,22,24 ;
11 :22 ; 26:20 ; 28:2
obviously 26 :14; 63 :13 ;
89 :5
occasionally 54 :15
occur 85
:15
; 86 :20
occurred 22 :10
occurring 70 :17
October 18 :12,20,22 ; 23
:2,
17; 86 :21
odor 101 :12
odors 101 :14
office 3
:8
; 9 :18,22 ; 10:2
offices 1 :12
OFFICIAL 105 :20
often 35 :5
okay 10 :4 ; 11 :20 ; 17:21
;
18:15 ; 19:6,8,14 ; 29 :8,
15 ; 32 :10,16
; 42
:23
;
43 :11 ; 44:6,14 ; 46:5 ;
48 :20 ; 49:5 ; 50:19 ; 51 :2 ;
59:9,15
; 60 :11 ; 61 :6,8,
23 ; 62 :5
; 75:21 ; 78:2,3
;
82 :5
; 88:11 ; 91
:2,3,4,9 ;
98 :20 ; 100 :2
; 103:7,18
old 7:4 ; 42 :14 ; 53:24 ;
55 :7,8 ; 79 :22
; 93:18
older 72 :19 ; 92 :18,19
once 45 :12 51 :7
one 5
:3
; 11 :11 ; 13:1,10 ;
24 :5 ; 27:22 ; 31 :9 ; 32
:11,
18,19,20
; 37 :1,15,18,19,
20 ; 38:3 ; 39:1 ; 48:14,24
;
50 :5 ; 51
:22 ; 52:6,13 ;
53 :6
; 54
:13
; 55 :10 ;
57 :18 ; 65 :18 ; 69:24
;
72 :20 ; 74:5 ; 75 :2,7
;
- 76 :6 ; - 77
:8 ; -78:2,3,13 ;
80
:13,23
; 81 :5 ; 93;6 ;
95 :15 ; 98 :2,22 ; 99:17 ;
100 :19 ; 101 :8
ones 31 ;24 ; 69:9
; 88:1
Feye 7
ongoing 17:4,
; 23 :21 ;
26:1 ; 80:6 ; 83:21 ; 85
:19
only 15 :24 ; 20 :20 ; 24 :5 ;
31
:24
; 34:3,11 ; 43 :7 ;
57 :3 ; 70 ;18 ; 85
:7
; 94
:7,
12,15
open 17 :14 ; 18:21
opened 95
:12
operate 74 :23
; 75 :3,19
operated 20 :17,22
; 72
:18 ;
97 :3,9
operating 16 :11 ; 26 :17;
52:15,16 ; 73:1 ; 81 :10 ;
97
:3
operation 68
:3
operational 5 :2
operations 56
:1
; 58
:9
operator 15 :8 ; 23 :4 ;
26:17 ; 37 :4,5 ; 56:14 ;
66
:17,20,24
; 67 :11,13,15,
23,24 ; 68 :1,4,6,9 ; 89 :6
operator's 35
:17
; 36 :11
operators 58
:22
; 59:1
;
66 :13
opinion 26 :16 ; 33:6 ;
40
:22 ; 42
:17
; 55 :18
;
69:16
; 73
:11
; 79:1
; 81 :8
;
89 :3 ; 92:22 ; 94:24 ; 97:19
opinions 97 :23
opportunity 62 :6
; 103
:4
opposed 4 :11,21 ; 33 :17 ;
43 ;6; 45 :8 ; 46 :8,10
;
47:23 ; 50 :11 ; 51 :3 ;
67:13 ; 75 :19 ; 82:22 ; 98 :4
option 16:2 ; 75 :9
options 75
:2,8
; 98 :10
oral 6 :21
oranges 45 :1
orbicul 55 :6
order 49:21 ; 51 :13
; 71
:12 ;
74;6 ; - 81 :16 ; 82 :17 ;
86:19 ; 94 :7; 97:20 ; 103:8
originally 7 :7
other 3 :23 ; 4:2 ; 5:5 ; 6:8
;
11
:3,14 ; 12 :9 ; 13:24 ;
14 :6
; 15
:23 ; 16
:19
; 17:1
;
31 :1
; 41 :22 ; 42:18 ;
.48:23 ; 49 :7 ; 51 :24 ; 53 :6,
16,22 ; 56 :7,13
; 57:3
;
58 :17
; 59 :13,17; 60 :22;
63 :5 ; 64:2 ; 65 :17 ; 69:23 ;
72 :21
; 74
:5,24
; 82
:3 ;
83 :24 . 84:1,3 ; 86:5 ;
88:21 ; 89:10 ; 94:15,16 ;
95 :2,9 ; 96 :14 ; 99 :21 ;
100
:2
; 101 :8
others 14
:8
otherwise 68 :14
ought 36
:8; 96:22
ourselves 14 :22 ; 71 :4,7
out 6:1 ; 10:2 ; 16:16 ;
29:2 ; 31
:3
; 34:24 ; 36:15 ;
37:2 ; 44 :22
; 48
:23 ;
51
:17 ; 52 :2 ; 53 :4 ; 54 :13 ;
58;8 ; 61 :8 ; 65:8 ; 69:4,
22 ; 70
:23 ; 73:4,15,19 ;
75 :3 ; 78 :20 ; 82 :7,23 ;
83 :1 ; 84:11 ; 85:16,17
;
86 :6,10,11 ; 87 :6,7,23,24
;
88 :15
; 92:16 ; 93 :9 ;
99
:10
; 100
:9,10
outcome 104 :14
outline 2 :24 ; 103
:12
outside 7
:11 ; 43 :6,9,11 ;
44 :9,10,15 ; 46 :10,12 ;
47
:4,6,11,24 ; 48 :9,14 ;
56 :24 ; 68:22
outstanding 64 :24
meet 27:9
; 28:4
; 41 :9 ;
Moose's 24 :13
47 :21 ; 72;24 ; 95 ;6,9
Moreover 39 :6 ; 45 :17
meeting 14:2 ; 27 :13,24 ;
MORRIS 1 :6
; 2 :8
.5
; 17:22 ;
28:8,17
; 94
:8 ; 103 :17
18 :2 ; 19:20,22 ; 20:2,6,
irdets 8i:10
13,15 ; 21 :19,23 ; 22 :4,6,
mention 30:3
7,9 ; 30
:18
; 56
:111
; 58 :3,
mentioned 15 :17 ; 16 :1 ;
24 ; 59:18
; 62
:13,17,22
;
25
:22 ; 32:11
; 38
:9
; 82 :1
63 :6 ; 67 :5,8,10,15,21 ;
met 26 :14 ; 27 :12,22,23 ;
69 :6,18 ; 70 :4,5,9,12,22 ;
28 :1 ; 98 :8
metal 99 :15
72 :9 ; 82:19 ; 105 :6
Morrisleic .l 18 :1
methane 84 :22 ; 87 :19
most 14 :19
; 16 :2
; 21 :6
;
method 15 :4
24 :9 ; 28 :19 ; 43 :23 ; 44:2 ;
might 36 :19 ; 46:18 ; 47:17 ; 74:21
; 96:10
50 :1 ; 52 :17 ; 55 :10 ;
move 34:18
; 40
:4,23
; 81 :1 ;
73 :12 ; 75 :14,15 ; 99:20
101 :18
migrating 52 :2
moved 9 :12 ; 40 :23
million 12 :15 ; 33 ;22 ;
moving 38
:13,16,18 ; 39 :6 ;
41 :18 ; 42 :7,9
; 45
:24 ;
86 :19 ; 101110
46:4 ; 50:20 ; 61 :4,10,14 ;
Ms . 2 :1
.5,11,15,5 ; 18 :23 ;
62 :1,3,11,12,18,19,21 ;
24 :11,21
; 25
:5 ; 99 :3
;
63 :4,6,12,22 ; 65
:4,10,13 ; 100 :17 ; 101 :7 ; 102 :5
77 :4,9,12,13,16,20,24
;
much 8 :13 ; 24 :19 ; 33 :13 ;
78 :3
; 83
:8,9,13
; 90 :18 ;
91 :1,2,8
mind 4
:20
; 5:4
; 25:6 ; 68:3
mine 53 :24
; 54
:9
; 79 :22
mined 42 :14 ; 54 :1
minerals 54
:10
36:18 ; 39 :20 ; 41 :10 ;
43:21 ; 46 :19 ; 58 :1 ;
62 :24 ; 74 :11 ; 78:10 ;
82 :8 ; 84 :12,19 ; 93 :2 ;
94 :22
municipal 1 :6,5
; 13 :2 ;
minor 79 :17; 82 :4
42
:20 ; 53 :8,16,17 ; 54 :14 ;
minute 42
:6
; 55:12
; 68:21 ; 72 :18 ; 105:6 .5
84 :9 ; 98 :22
misinterpreted 35
:6 ; 67 :16
municipalities 4 :19
municipally 73 :18
HissoUri-Rolls 5 :19
must 61 :20,21 ; 94 :24
misunderstanding 45 :19
myself 52 :19 ; 92 :6
misunderstood 97 :1
misused 35 :6
------------------- ------
N
mitigate 101 :14
----------------- --------
mix-up 48:4
name 3
:7
; 27:18
; 28 :10
model 13 :11 ; 34
:13,15,18, national 9 :20
19 ; 35
:1,4,8,10,15',17,18 ; nationwide 6 :22 ; 9 :21,24
36 :12,14 ; 37
:1,2,4,10,16, natural 35 :20
17; 38
:4,9,12 ;,42 :4 ;
near 29 :13
49 :12,13,16 ; 65 :17;
91 :23 ; 92:24 ; 94 :1,16,21 ;
95 :1,6
modeled 95 :19
modeling 35 :12,15 ; 91 :22 ;
nearly 4 :17 ; 9:12
; 27 :1
necessarily 16 :6 ; 22 :5 ;
33:10; 35 :19; 38 :5 ;
60:23
; 68:7 ; 80:16 ;
85 ;13 ; 92 :2
93 :4,7,9,11
; 96 :20
necessary 11 :21 ; 22 :2 ;
modification 64 :5,7
83 :23 ; 97 :18
modifications 64 :19
need 16 :20 ; 24 :15,23 ;
modify 60:10
34 :10 ; 37:1 ; 40 :23
; 62
:9 ;
money 13 :4 ; 16:14,16 ;
70
:3,6
; 81 :3
; 84:20
43 :24 ; 44 :1,5 ; 57:6
;
needed 13;5 ; 23 :4 ; 29:2 ;
62 :14 ; 63 :1 ; 82
:19,20 ;
33 :7 ; 76:20 ; 79 :15 ; 89 :2
96 ;12
needs 38 :4 ; 51 :11,12 ;
monitor 25
:23 ; 71 :10 ;
62:8 ; 76:23 ; 77:15 ;
79 :8
; 87:14 ; 92 :14 ; 96 :4
81
:13,15 ; 88 :13 ; 96:16
;
monitoring 8 :7 ; 15 :10 ;
102
:4
23:22,23 ; 26 :5
; 28
:18,20,
negative 45 :6 ; 51 :23
22,23,24 ; 42 :16 ; 43
:3,4 ; negotiations 36 :17
56 :6 ; 70 :16,18,20,23,24
; network 76
:7,8,11 ; 78 :18,
71 :12,15,21
; 72
:2 ; 74
:18 ; 21 ; 87:6 ; 90 :10
76 :7,8,10,11,14,16 ; -
never 28
:1,3,10 ; 95 :12
78:18,21,22,23
; 79 :2 ;
new 8:8
; 9 :23 ; 17 :14 ;
80 :7,8,17 ; 83 :16,21 ;
42 :19 ; 52
:22 ; .89 :18
85
:20,21
; 86:8,9 ; 87 :6,7,
next 29:21 ; 80 :17,23
9,10,13 ; 88
:2,4,9,10 ;
night 85 :8
90 :10,18,19,24
; 91 :6,7 ;
nine 6 :8
96
:20
No's 102 :8
month 21
:15
No's, 68 :24
monthly 87 :16
No .
1 ;4;'5 :8 ; 25 :7 ; 32
:13 ;
months 101 :15
69 :12 ; 102 :17 ; 103
:9,12 ;
MOOSE-4- :9, 2;13 :5 ; 3
:2,7 ;
104 :4
; 105
:4
-
. .
24 :14,16 ; 56 :19
; 57 :16 ;
nobody 12
:6 ; 82 :7,17
61 :18 ; 66 :10 ; 69 :12 ;
non-regulatory 55
:9
98
:16 ; 102 :13,16 ; 103 :3,
none 29 :4 ; 52
:12
; 54
:15 ;

 
08-02-06 Deposition of Devin Moose
Page 8
eJtgerd 45
:9
1 pending 78 :12,14 ; 100 :12
93 :13 ; 95 :1,13
; 101 :8
offer
4 :19 ; 3
:4 ; 35 :11 ;
perviy
59:7,14
l~,nts 73
:22
8
:12
; 9:I1,24
; 16 :2 ;
40 :11 ; 54:6,23 55_1 ;
-eople '1 :2 ; 26 :14
; 35:13 ; nOLLuti^-n 1
:1 ; 3 :19,23 ;
I 20
:23
; 2416,21 ; 22
:1,15
74
:l ; 75
:16 ; 77:3 . ;
36 :19 ; 54 :12 ;
105 :2
18
:5
; 19:15 ; 96:24
; 105 :7
1
1 27:7 ; 32
:21 ; 1
.
.0:16
; 42 :
-
82 :13,16 ; 90 :17,91 r Inr (.0
:1'1 ; 61 :9 ; 58
:6,20 ;
rInd/quarry 54
:11
54 :19 ; 56
;22 ; 58 :21,22; -
overall
72:23
",
10
poor 42
:11,21,22
:~,
; ,- :'I ; 80 :15 ;
pPowners
oxygen
owner
own
overheight
owned
overliner
override
overt
.m
10456.E243940
.
;
:141:22:4:5 491:1568f
;
:9.5412
;
;
:1136L
87:22:1,5,9,1040
;
;
;
67l
94:21:11:1940
;
1032105:934:2,9,11,12,14,
;
73:18:135438
;
;
:14:7,1215.--,-
;
:22:9,16P:232095:11
;
:20.566:8101:21
;
:16:4,13
;
;
;
;
.
3 .5
.
4459
;
3938:9 :273:20:6,24:12
;
:2:19:3
;
;
;
.
permit
permanent
permission
periods
perimeters
period
perimeter
perform
performance
performing
per=ectly
per
29369015539187
;
:19:23:2,4:15:15:11-sect
21
;
;
;
;
415:22,23323792:11102561580:9:19457:11,13,14:3:44970:4:13
;
3660
;
:1:1311
;
:9:1417
;
;
20:22:13:1580:14028:9,12,14,
;
:3
;
:7:4,15:21
;
7371
;
;
21:23
;
87:934:24
;
;
:1
;
:6
;
;
;
post-closure
possibility
possible
post
posed
positive
pose
poses
portion
poorly
33242315,243051708913
;
:1:3:15:1:23:19,23:1065;
;
1682
;
;
;
81
;
297661:8,11,12:1256:173162391516:4:12:17:6,7,8,9,11,13,7044
;
:15.3,19:16
;
:17:7,18
;
:1925:3:10
;
44579611
;
;
:23
;
78:5
;
:21
;
:23247
;
:9,15
;
45:174
;
696317-:3:8,23
;
:2329:14:3,4,7,:17
;
.6,17,-79:23
;
;
49
;
:4
;
;
82
;
:6
;
:9
;
produce
producing
produced
production
process
procedure
proceeding
proceedings
problems
probe
probes
problem
22161425104873410
;
:10,15:14:24:18,19:103082
;
;
:21.583701275388870:24
;
20:2042
;
53:13
;
:3:3:5,8:8232315:13:589
;
64:44
;
:13
;
;
:14:15:2
;
:118413:15
;
:23859422
;
72:21
;
:6,14:17:2343
;
:13,15:917
;
91:22
;
;
:1,11,86:21,
;
101
;
:9,
;
:1
P .O . 1 :22 .5 ; 2:6 .5
48 :24 ; 49:14,15 ; 60
:9,23 ;
84 :7 ; 90 :13 ; 100 :4
productive 74:21
page
package
2:1426.5,17:13 .5 ; 29:12,
6367:8,20:12 ; 64
; 68:5,8,17:8,18
;
;
7065:1:17,
;
posting
post-secondary
11:7; 135;4:17
professional
10:17
; 12:2,5,66:1,7,14,17
; 22:21 ;
;
pages
14
; 102104:15:11
;
;
104105:9:12
8519:23
; 77
;
:1187;
:1478;
:7,1289:9
;
;
91:9 ; potable
pot 99:13,1442:17
; 80:4
profit
66:1 ;
96104:13:4,19.5
paper
panel
1006
:21,22:5
; 8
:18
92100:1:10,11
; 93 :15 ; 95 :1,2,4,5 ;
Potential
71 :13 ; 7920:12:5;
;
8170:5:11
;
;
project
27 :18 ;
976:1,2:24 ; 12
:16 ;
paragraph
paragraphs
2973:21:20
permit31:14,15,18,20,23
. 15:14 ; 30:15
; 32
;
:4, potentially
101:14
; 10215:3:2
projecting
projections
2111:19:5
; 12:18
parameters
parameter
parcel
3914,1512,14,15,17,18:17
;
;
25133:2137:1:2272.5,22
;
:19
;
:2,35334
;
:7.535:7,9,10,
;
;
;
79:163259:24
;
:12,:23
;
permitted
4663682417,79,24:17
;
:2:2152;
;
;
49:47267
;
:6
;
32:13:10,155
;
33:2,750:10
;
:3,15.273:5,15,17,
;
;
;
:1427267
;
;
60:4:2:13100
;
:16
;
:8
;
practical
P01W
pour
practicable
6597:20:219556;
:5:109733:1816:12:12
; 59
; 44:19:2
;
;
property
proposing
proposes
protect
projects
proposed
38446933843:18.15:15:13:14:14;
;
1019:20:21
60 :14 ; 65 :6,10,11 ; 72 :17, permittee 68 :10
practice 16 :11
protection 1 :21 ; 2 :10 .5 ;
1220,22
; 75
;
:4,873
:14,20,21
; 77
:13
;
;
83.74:16,:9,
permitting
53
:13 ; 79
:144
:7
;
;
9130:21:21
;
pre-Subtitle
precise 35 :8,1092
:19
466:3:5; 10
:9 ; 34 :20 ; 42 :2 ;
2317,18,19102;
:14,1595:2,71,16
; 93;24
;
;
10094:8,9:2,18,
;
personally
person
99:6
4:1127
; 26:17:17
; 68:16
; precisely
precursor
51:21
; 731120:4
;
:21:2475
;
:1521:13
; 82
;
:7
prove
protective
65:19,2299:2033:10
; 38:6 ;
Park
parcels
pert
1005612
;
:21:201642;
:16:6:24
;
7532101
;
:11
;
:8112Z:23
;
;
:1661:278
;
;
:2:131228;
;
72:19:8,11,:24
;
pertains
photos
phonetic
photographs
persons
pertaining
2310431Z2:1510:10:15:826:14.5:3
premature
predecessors
predominately
predominantly
preferred
14:17 ; 15452:17,20:21,22.69117:11:17:7;
;
16
;
1117:1:8:19
;
;
providing
provided
Pruim
proven
provides
provide
205319:182942:214:19:9:Z:11
; 30:4
participate
participated
19; 97:3
368:16:17
; 88:18,
pick
picking
physics
34:186653:3:18
prepare
10217:5:12,14
; 3281:8:18; 39:16 ;
public
3813:7:6,18
;
129
;
:11:542
;
;
:33312
;
:11:16,1956 ;
:2434;
;
:20 ;
particular
11,204
; 33
;
:1837;
:18,21635:20,24:7,14; 38
;
;
3136:17:2,:10,
;
piece
pie
place
991616:13,14:15:20
;
;
3833:11:18
;
; 53100;22:5
; present
presence
prepared
172100:16:6;
:222:9,5
; 20:4 ;
7910260:18:9:2;
;
;
8110410:12:7,11:4
;
.5,2092
;
:274
;
;
:7,1796:14;
;
49:15,16 ; 65 :16,18 ;
54 :8 ; 94:15 ; 96:4
; 104:8 ; 38:24 ; 104 :8,5
105
:20 .5
79 :21 ; 96 :6 ; 101 :15,17,23 105 :11
presented 71
:18 ; 95 :6
publications 31
:10
particulate 46 :17
; 48 :8,
placing 54 :14
pressure 45
:6
; 51 :23
; 52 :2 publicly 13 :7
parties
10,18
; 5168:9:6
; 71:19 ;
plan
43:7220
;
:1946:1; 21
; 48:12,14,18:20 ; 49
;
:6 ; pretreatment
presumptive 9658:7,8:14
pump
pulling
36:2151:16
; 41
;
:245Z ;
:343:15
;
104 :8-5,13
.5
50 :4,15,17; 51 :4 ; 60 :21, pretty 8 :12
; 36 :18 ; 41 :10 ; 49 :17; 73 :18
party 15
:6,12 ; 56 :12,13 ;
22.,24
; 63 :16 ; 76 :21 ;
46 :19
; 92:10
pumped 43 :1 ; 54 .13
57:12 ; 61 :16; 67 :6 ; 68 :17 78017; 86:1 ; 94:5 ; 101 :21
prevent 45 :6 ; 49 :21
pumping 37:9,11
; 42:10,21 ;
pass
22
; 366:21:12,16
; 34
;
:1938;
:1335:18,
;
planned
planning
159:19,22:21
; 11:17 ;
previously
previous 3152:5
;
:10104; 53:5.5:8 ;
4673:8,13:15
; 91
; 49:16,17:19
;
;
5393:4,5:17
;
49 :12,14 ; 94 :1,2
19
:2 ; 2Z :Z
54:23 ; 82:1
purged 70
:24
passed 34
:14,17
; 42 :5 ;
plans 49 :22
primary 81 :5
purpose 19 :15
; 28 :2,11 ;
93 :24
; 94:21
; 95 :1
Please 35
:1
prior 14 :19 ; 30 :16 ; 31 :7;
32 :12 ; 47:12
; 93:12
passes 36
;2
plunking 86 :7
53 :12 ; 71 :22
purposefully 27 :13 ; 86 :15
passing 6 :18 ; 36 :5
plus 40 :9 ; 63 :12
private 12 :19,21 ; 13
:1,7
;
pursuant 89 :6
-pathway 79 :12
point 14:18.,23 ; . 22-4 ;
20 :22 ; 21 :3 ; 58 :21 ; 59 :1 ;
put 13 :17
; 14:18
; 22:16 ;
pay 58 :17
27 :7,20 ; 38 :7 ; 47 :21 ;
68 :17
26
:24 ; 36
;6 ; 40:4 ; 41 :11 ;
Pee 1 :4
; 37:7,8
; 67:14 ;
51
:16,19
; 54:22
; 55
;1 ;
privilege 24 :8
51 :14
; 55
:2
; 63 :6 ; 69
:3
;
peers
105:46:21,22
8956:23:12 ;
; 6290;10:6
;
;
9273:17:17;
;
probably
pro 13:104;
:584;
:235:6
; 7:15
;
7493:19:3 ;
;
8495:21:8
;
; 9196:2,23:23
;

 
3E . :6 ;
50 :10 ; 57:11 :
62:14
63:1
; 7E :4 ;
X5 :22
27;1 ; ; r;S
:1 ; 95:3
recui : n=et 7: I : 39 :13 ;
47:2 ; Sz :7 ; 56
:IZ ; 613 .8
requirements 8 :6
; 10 :11,
4712 :18
; 30
;
:1478 ;
:7,1031
:18 ; 32 :23 ;
requires
12 :2 ; 146:17:14,15,16,18,20
; 29
:19,22
;
requiring 67 :13
reserve 103 :7
reside 7
:10
residual 42 :3 ; 101
:22
resolve 64 ;24
resolved 102 :4
resources 26 :18 ; 35
:19
respect 21 :7
respectful 82
:18
respectfully 67 :18
Respondent 2 :3 .5,8
Respondent'
. 2 :19
respondents
105 :7 .5
1 :7 .5
; 29 :22 ;
responses 69 :6,8,9
reeponsibiLities 9
:15 ;
68:5 ; 81 :20
responsibility 37
:4 ;
6567 :23,24;5
; 68
:4,13
; 66 :2,3,12 ;
responsible 66 :14 ; 68
:2
result 33 :16 ; 38 :22 ; 39:4
resulted 70 :12
results 71 :6
retain 22 :14
retained 7 :21 ; 22 :6,23,24 ;
26 :9,10,11
retaining 70 :12
revealed 22 :13
revenue 12 :18
review
70 :9 ;
15103:14:4 ; 32 :19
; 59 :4 ;
reviewed 28 :12 ; 31 :14 ;
32 :22 ; 34 :13,14
revised 100 :11
revision 29 :20
Richard 28 :8
rigid 56 :21
risk
road 10238
;24:2 ; 81
:12
Rockford
Roman 29
.13,17,182
:7
Roque 2 :11
roughly 61 :14 ; 86:2
routine 85 :19 ; 90 :16,18,
20,23,24
; 91
:5,6
ruled 57
:12
rules 66 :23 ; 67 :1
run 9:17 ; 46:15
running 49
:16
; 83
:9
rush 86 :6
-------------$
safe 15:1 ; 45:13
; 93
:5
safely 45 :12
safety
34:21 ;
2538:20:6,19
; 33
;
:1170
;
:7 ;
9274:17:3
;
;
10179:21:9
;
;
89102:1,4:3
;
same 15
:7,20 ; 44 :18 ;
45 :13 ; 50
:23 ; 65 :13,15 ;
68;7 ; 72 :3
; 94 :10,14
;
-105 :13
samples 71 :4
sanctity 70 :20
sanitary 56
:24 ; 73 :19
save 39
:22
Pz,1e c
saw 25;3
; 29:1 ; s2:6 ;
54 :6 ; 01
;'11
savlnn 47 :10 ;
56 : 34 ; 93.24
says 9:14
;
24
:5,14 .
29 :21
3092:11:7,9 ; 68 :1,9
; 69 :11 ;
scans 87 :17
schedule
101
:16
27 :13 ; 30 :15,20 ;
scheduled
85 :18 ; 861:13:14
; 18
:12 ;
school 5
:17
Schweickert 28
:9
Science 5 :18 ; 6 :6
scientific 8
:18 ; 91 :16
Scope 65
:17; 8906
scrutiny 8 :5
seal
seasons
79
:1386 ;
:14104
:16 ; 105
:20
second
29:14 ;
1172:15,16:5
; 74
;
:1512:8,12
;
section 99
:15
sector 58 .22 ; 59 :1
secure
securing
1533:1:14
sedimentation 15 .11
see 24
:4 ; 29:18; 31 :11 ;
326
;
:569;
:1444 ;
:1384;
:21,22,2349:22
; 54:2,
seeing 91 :18
seeked 12
:22 ; 13 :1
seeking 4 :11 ; 17 :13
seemed 37
:8 ; 59 :20
seems 57:3
; 59:19 ; 96 :22 ;
100 :4
seen 31
:11 ; 50:1 ; 59:8 ;
82 :15
seepage 38 :1
select 78 :13
semantic 95 :7
send 24 :20
senior 9 .1
sense 84:24 ; 85
:16 ; 86 :6 ;
92 ;2; 96:9
sensitivity 36
:7
sent 22
:21 ; .27 :11
sentence 30
:7
separate
67:12
; 6911:22:10
; 13:11 ;
separately 62
:20 ; 63
:5,8
;
69 :23
separating 55 :8
September 72
:9
series
13,14,15,1663
:17 ;
; 8570 :14:9
; 76 :12,
serious 23 :4
served 42 :19
services 22 :21
set 29:10 ; 73:12
; 81
:9
;
104 :15
.5
settled 41 :7
Settler's 8
:1
seven 6 :16 ; 83
:1
several 36
;13 ; 73 :15 ;
75 :11 ; 96:6 ; 97:20
shallow 46 :23
sharp 101 :19
Shaw 1 :12 ; 2:23
; 9
:3,6,7,
10,14,21
; 22 :17,19;
27 :23 ; 71
:24; 102 :21
short 68 :23 ; 92
:22 ; 98 :23 ;
101 :6 ; 102:1
shorthand 32 :12
; 10413 .5,
10 .5,12,19
show 5:10 ; 51:18 ; 99:18
shows 36 :2
side 74 :10,12
; 82 :9 ;
_ . tb°nZ-06
DNpositio'n of 0=vi-i xoc5a
u22ing
_ats 65 :1243
:2 ; 57 :6 ; T5 :16 ;
^e.uozd 41 :'15
ree .
:
ua:ea 33:5
------
75:23 ;
--
83----------------:14
0
------------
radar 23 :7 21
; _2 :
k'>
:5 :117
reri, :
t:nrk d + : : e
quality 42
:11,21 ; 81 :18 ;
referred 25
:1 ;
84 :12,22
65 :14 ; 102:12,16
; 103 :2
referring 28 :17 ;
quantity
15
:4 ; 34:4 ; 84:22
32 :18 ;
quarters 71 :Z1
39 :14,15 ; 52
:5 ; 57 :18 ;
100
:3,18
question 11 :10,18,19 ;
46:7 ; 53 :6 ; 56:18 ; 65 :Z1 ;
67:22 ; 68
:20 ; 70:21 ;
75 :1,12,16 ; 85 :5,13 ;
100 :2 ; 101 :8
refiLed 27 :6
reflective 37
:16
regime 35 :10
Registered 6 :7,14,17;
questionable 38 :14
12 :6
; 66 :1
; 104 :4,19 .5
questions 6
:23 ; 52 :6 ; 99:4
quick 55
:11 ; 88:24
quickly 14
:9 ; 16:15 ; 74 :14
quit 9 :12
quite 53
------------------:15
; 60
:3 ; 67 :17
R
regulation 33 :16
regulations 4
:24 ; 7 :19 ;
81914:17,21
;
:351
; 35:14
;
:210
;
;
56:5,642:12,22:24
; 11
; 47
;
;6,13:10,
;
5766:8:5,18
; 63
;
:1067 ;
:2464;
:368;
:165;
:19 ;
92 :5,7,10
; 93 :2,3 ; 98
:7
R
.P .R_ 1 :10
ramped 74 :15
Randolph 1 :18 .5
ranged 41 :3
rate 38:1 ; 58:7
ratio 75
:15
rational 93
:10
reached 77 :15
read 37:7 ; 43 :22 ; 67:14,
23
; 96:24 ; 105 :10
real 22 :9 ; 29:4 ; 36:9 ;
37;2 ; 38:8
; 44 :11 ; 93:12 ;
'96 :23 ; 99 :11
realistic 97:18,21
reality 37 :16
really 8:8 ; 9:17
; 13 :13 ;
regulator 93
:13
regulatory 8 :6 ; 13 :21 ;
48:12 ; 55 :9
related 15 :3 ; 30 :5 ;
104 :13 .5
relatively
relevance 2514:20:23
; 92:20
relevant 25 :1
reliable 76 :9
relief 19 :16
reio 94
:8
relocated 34 :10 ; 94 :9,10
relocation 38
:10,11 ;
60 :13,14 ; 78
:15 ; 93:23,
24 ; 94:6
retaining 75 :4
22
:1,10 ; 24 :17; 30 :1. ;
remedial 23 :18
; 52 :14
31 :24 ; 33 :11,16 ; 35 .16 ;
1638;
:2353
;
:945;
.2255:5; 46
; 59:8
;
:2150;
:2,
remediation 8 :15 ; 9 :19;
95 :3
remember 4
:1 ;,18 :18,19 ;
received
recalled
receive
reasons
recall
reason
684970282134978492736070:22:24:1:2,8,12,13:1:3,6,8,10:22:20:5:20:15:4;
;
.20,22
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
90153937464165096987185:2431T48:7:8,12.24.21:15,16:16:6:7:6:4,10:13:12:3:12
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
4
;
9523
;
;
5931
;
9827:56572278386:2441:16
;
:2,5:2:6:2,6,10:24:23:8,16,24:24:419:8,13
;
;
;
;
;
;
;
4196:9
;
68
;
:13:23
;
;
:2
;
;
;
reported
repermitted
report
rephrase
removing
repair
repairs
removed
remodel
removal
remove
742416181823
;
:8
;
;
:57226
;
83
;
8124:8,9:28634:2038154129952354
;
:9,19,2045:11:9:16:19:10,11:16:19,2129:15
;
:21:17
;
:1039
;
7388:8,10
;
25
;
:16:6,12,2145:20104:3,11,15,
;
;
;
:12
;
794088:1071:15,:10:23,:7,
;
reportedly 87 :23
recent 71 :22
Reporter 104 :4,19,19
.5
recess 55
:13
reporting 81
:19; 85 :22 ;
87 :5
recognizing 76
:24 ; 77 ;7
recollection 31 :5 ; 40 :6 ;
reports 31 :11
recollections
90 :3
20
:9
representatives
represent 4 :16 ;
2736
:8:11,23
; 37
:2
recommendation
84 .13
; 89 :2
74
:20 ;
represented 37
:18
recommendations
recommended
19,22 ; 78:665
; 09:276
;
:2370:9,18,:9
;
requesting
representing
request
represents
72:8
; 10027:23:5,624363:14:15
;
:964; 5:19:6
;
74 :16 ; 86.1
;_ 90
:14
require 35 :2;
.42 :24
;---
reduce
record
records
100;15,16402021;21:24:10
;
;
7026:8:20
;
98:21 ;
required
632843:24:18:21 ;
;
;
3092447:1:17:14:19
;
;
;
;
15314793:8:8:11:4;
;
16
;
34:12:6
;
;

 
08-02-06 Deposition
rt
fevin
010.11,
_ .
84
:18,20` 99
:22
sides 7: :23,24
sighr 35 :13
S19mot 31 :15
significant
>i
.9neture
0C-:T25
:4 ; Li :IS ;
64 :5,7 ; 71 :23 ; 81 :13,14 ;
101 :13
similar 53:3 ; 84:4
simple 67:19
; 73
:17
; 99
:11
simply 14 :18 ; 24 :16 ; 36 :5 ;
42 :3 ; 95 :8 ; 100 :9
since 30 :8 ; 32 :17; 37 :20 ;
42:15 ; 53:20 ; 54:1
; 71
:8,
20
single 45 :23
sit 19:9 ; 21 :2,9
; 42 :8
;
59 :2,6 ; 68 :22
site 12:21 ; 21 :4 ; 26 :13,
14,16,17,21
; 31
:5 ; 33 :13,
14 ; 35 :10,12 ; 36 :10,11,
22 ; 37 :1,3 ; 42 :10,15,19,
21 ; 53
:7 ; 70:8 ; 72
:15 ;
74
:11,15
; 76 :23 ; 82
:9,17
;
83 :5 ; 88
:22
; 89;11 ; 90
:2,
4 ; 96 :6,22 ; 97:4,10
sites 8
:8
; 41 :3
siting 5 :2 ; 9:22
six 3 :13 ; 9:24 ; 52:18 ;
59:8 ; 87
:1
sketch 50
:1
skip 15 :16
slight 41 :17
slightly 33 :21 ; 40 :11
slope 7
:23
slow 47 :17
small 12 :21 ; 84:5
soil 48 :8,10,18 ; 51 :9,17 ;
82 :8,13,16
soils 5 :22
solid 6:10 ; 7:3 ; 8:15,20,
22 ; 9:19,20 ; 10 :5,6
;
20
:19
; 21 :12,14,18 ;
53:16; 54 :14 ; 72
:18
solution 93 :21 ; 96 :7,8,9
solving 38
:8
somebody 14 :21 ; 59:17
someone 56 :15
someplace 38
:13 ; 92 :5
something
11:14 ; 143:2:14
; 16
; 10:7
;
:1941;
:17
;
43
:24
; 57 :2 ; 88 :21 ; 94 :6 ;
99 :10
sometime 27 :5
sometimes 31 :10
somewhere 8 :17,12 ; 49 :20 ;
92 :21
soon 16:12 ; 70:10
sorry 16 :13 ; 36:11 ; 37:17 ;
51 :12 ; 58:5 ; 69 :8 ; 76 :19 ;
77:23 ; 91 :3 ; 102 :14
sort 5
:15
; 14 :3 ; 25 :13 ;
30 :16 ; 41
:7; 46:17
;
55:16; 60
:12
; 75 :24 ;
78 :19 ;98 :2
sorts 75:23 ; 87:20
sounds 95 :11
Soviet 93
:18
space 34 :11
spacing 51 :15
SPEAKERPHONE 2 :9 .5
speaking 67 :18
specific 17 :22 ; 44 :12 ;
90 :13
specifically 7
:13 ; 10
:22 ;
11 :8 ; 14 .12 ; 22 :5,20,24 ;
30:3 ; 31 :6 ; 33 :19 ; 34:1 ;
51 :1 ; 67:12 ; 68 :9,12 ;
82:8:ifirs
;
90:74:6
; 91
; 44:21:7
rerifled 104
:8
spand
rt
. .,dMating
'5
:4:18
:18
;
4942:13:9
; 44:1 ;
63 :1
spending 82 :20
split 11
:18 ; 65 :8 ; 69
:22
spread 38 :21
spring 86
:20
Springfield 1h23
5sSt
.
1041
:13:1 ;
.5
7 :11 ; 9 :17
stability 7 :23
stage 86
:18
standard 16:11
; 52 :14 ;
75
:22
standards 73
:1 ; 81
:11
standing 88 :21
standpoint 72 :11
start 72 :22 ; 86:7; 90:21 ;
96 :23
started 5 :16,24 ; 39:8 ;
54:14 ; 88 :9
starting 86 :20
starts 18 :17
state 1 :2,11,17 ; 3 :9 ;
4 :18,19 ; 12:2,7 ; 17:24 ;
18
:9
; 19:16
; 20 :13 ; 21 :7 ;
23 :2,14 ; 36
:18 ; 52
:9,12,
16 ; 66 :1 ; 70 :15 ; 101
:1,3 ;
104
:1,4 .5 ; 105 :2
State's 2:20 ; 19:18 ; 37:4 ;
69 :10
stated 30
:13
statement 72 :23
statements 40 :5
states 6;8
; 10 :1 ; 93 :1
status 64 :12 ; 81
:7
stay 52 :9 ; 84:8
step 15 :16
steps 24 :15
still 40 :7
; 44:15
; 47:17
;
48:10 ; 50 :13 ; 71 :2
; 73 :8 ;
92 :15
; 100
:1
storm 15 :3 ; 83:3,6
straight 14 :16
Street
Streeter
1
:1854
:7.5
; 2 :2 ; 5 :4
strict 93 :2
study 5 :22 ; 24 :15 ; 84 :11
stuff 7 :7; 55:16 ; 73;8
sub 76 :13
submit 15:13 ; 65 :1 ; 101 :3
submitted 17 :2 ; 48 :20 ;
69:11 ; 74:9 ; 77:11 ; 101 :2
subscribe 105 :13
Subscribed 105 :18 .5
subsequent 54 :9
substance 46 :18
subsurface 87 :18
Subtitle 92
:11,15,21 ; 93 :3
successful 96 :5
suggested 38 :12 ; 94 :7,2
suit 104 :14
Suite 2 :2
summer 85 :19 ; 86 :16,20
supplemental 2 :20 ; 69 :9,10
support 54 :22
surface 87 :17,18 ; 99 :23
surprised 54 :17
surprises 54 :15 ; 77 :1
surrounded 42
:12
;-48 :8,10-
surrounding 53 :1 ; 96 :16
sworn 3 :1,3 ; 104:6 ;
105 :18 .5
synthetic 55 :7
system51
70:21,2743:3;
;
7145:1:4.5
;
;
tier
tight
3182:17
. 24
72 :7,17 ;
7t
:14,23 ; 77 8 ;
c
5
1
,-
15 81
;
:3,e
2 :
; w2;2,6,12,I
7817
tins
xitl .ed-7194
:22:15
; - 102 :11
,,,,,,
84
:10
tasks 2:24 ; 60 :4,6,15 ;
62 :9,13,15
; 63
:17; 69 :22 ;
75 :22 ; 76 :12 ; 77:19,23 ;
80:12 ; 82 :3 ; 103 :13
taxpayers 96 :13
taxpayers' 44 :5 ; 82
:19 ;
96 :12
technical 98 :5
technically 47 :18
technique 52
:14 ; 53 :2
tells 36 :18
ten 3 :13 ; 9 :12 ; 12 :10 ;
52 :18
term 20 :17 ; 47:20 ; 68:18
terms 46 :14 ; 48 :4,16
;
58 :19 ; 99:7
testified 3 :3,15,18 ; 4 :14 ;
30 :13
testify 4:10
; 18 :4 ; 19 :4,
11 ; 69:12 ; 104:6
testifying 19 :3
themselves 60 :6,19 ; 86 :16,
17
; 88 :5 ; 92 :8
theoretically 57
;5
there's 11 :11
; 16
:10 ;
23 :3 ; 32 :17 ; 45 :15 ;
51 :18,24; 52 :1,21 ; 53:4
;
54:1 ; 56 :6 ; 57
:9
; 60 :13 ;
64 ;22 ; 67 :15 ; 70 :6; 73:2,
3,13,20 ; 76
:24 ; 81 :14 ;
82:16 ; 84:19 ; 85 :5,14 ;
88:8; 91 :15 ; 92:8 ; 95 :18
thereafter 104 :10 .5
thereof 104 :14 .5
they've
67
:16
thick 82 :13
thing 14
:3,5
; 15 :17 ; 24
:5 ;
30 :16 ; 43 :23 ; 45 :13 ;
72 :5 ; 74:6 ; 78 :13 ; 82 :14 ;
93 :20
things 6 :15
; 11
:11 ; 26 :19 ;
42 :8
; 51 :22
; 62
:7
; 65 :17
;
69:22 ; 74 :13 ; 75 :11,24
;
86:18 ; 87:20 ; 98 :4
thinking 11 :11 ; 14 :12
third 15 :6,12 ; 56 :12,13;
57:12 ; 61 :16 ; 74:6
third-party 55 :19 ; 59 :17
though 41 :8
thousand 37 :22 ; 79 :17 ;
86
:2
threat 29 :4 ; 70 :7,12 ;
71 :13
; 76 ;1 ; 92 :15 ; 96 :2
threats 81 :5
three 41 :3 ; 47:9
; 70
:13 ;
73 :23
; 82 :16 ; 85 :7 ;
99 :22,24 ; 192 :11
threshold 25 :2
threw 36 :19
throughout 36 :24
lit, 10
today 71
:19 ; 75 :9 ; 87
:4 ;
65 :12
; 73:9 ; 91
:7
touches 103
:19
towards 43 :17 ; 45 :8
town 7:11
traded 13
:7
trained 4 :24
transcribed 104 :11
transcript 104 ;9,11 ;
105 :10,14
transcription 104 :11 .5
treat 36 :21 ; 41 :24
; 49:16,
17 ; 55 :23 ; 56 ;13 ; 58:3;
59:18 ; 84 :14 ; 96 :15
treated 43 :1
; 50:15 ; 51 :3
treating 37 :11 ; 42 :10,21,
23 ; 43 :2,4
; 45 :11,14 ;
46 :9,13 ; 48:1 ; 49 :7 ;
55 .19 ; 56 :5 ; 91 :18 ; 93 :17
treatment 45 :4,5,17,21,22;
46:4
; 47:13 ; 49:2
; 50:21 ;
56 :1,9 ; 57 :12 ; 58 :1,17 ;
59:1
; 91 ;10 ; 95:13
trees 93
:12
tried 86 :18
truck 94 :11
true 41 :6 ; 45
:24
; 66:6,19 ;
104:11 .5 ; 105 :13
truth 104 :6
.5
try 51:6 ; 64 :6 ; 73 :6 ;
97
:16
trying 52
:22,24
Tuesday `18 :20
twelve 3
:13
two 8:14
; 9 :7,11 ; 11 :11 ;
13:1 ; 21 :15 ; 32
:4,19
;
39:6 ; 41 :1 ; 50;1 ; 52:13 ;
60 :16 ; 62:19
; 65:12
;
73 :24 ; 77:7; 80:9; 82:16;
89 :15 ; 92 :4; 94 :3,6,12 ;
100
:20
tying 83 :4
type 8:15
; 9:19 ; 12 :19;
14:5
; 15
:4
; 17:11
; 54:18,
24
; 93
:18
types 4 :7 ; 13 :1 ; 70:2
-----------------------
-----------------
0
--------
U .S . 96 :9
ultimate 87:1
ultimately 25 :19 ; 26 :19
;
33 :15 ; 74 :16
Um-hum 19:17
; 31 :16
; 86
:22
Urns 17
:10
unable 35 :18 ; 36 :12,16
unaware 26 :15
uncerman 44 :19
; 45:4 ; 52:7
under 4:3 ; 17:10
; 23 :19 ;
25
:23 ; 29 :12,17
; 30
:9 ;
37:17 ; 38 :1 ; 50:15 ; 51 :4
;
54:2,19 ; 68 :18 ; 76:10 ;
,c0, 85 .11 ; 87
:8,9 ;
4
88:2,13 ; 89
:18 ; 90 :11 ;
95 :3
systems 45 :4,5,10
; 84 :1
89 :18 ; 103 :20
today's 72
:24 ; 81 :10
together 74
:8
; 91 :23
---------------
t
----------
took
tool
tomorrow
3235:5,14:675
; 94:9
;
:2293:8
top 15 :11 ; 55 :3 ; 82:8 ;
talked 16:3 ; 40:14
; 44 :24 ;
102
:21
51 :22 ; 75 :24 ; 77:3
;
topic 81
:1
93 :22 ; 98 :6
topics 103 :13
talks 30 :4
total 39
:9,12 ; 40 ;21 ;
task 77:24 ; 80 :9,23 ; 81
:2 ;
41 :12,16 ; 61
:4,23 ; 62 :11,-

 
08-02-06 Deposition of Cevin Moose
85 :22 ; s7 :14
lmd~rctaV 34
.2, .,5,7,20
underground 73 :8
undarLain 5,
:19
underl :us .94 :4
units 4 :17
University 5 :19
unless 24 :7
vrvneasurable 47
:17
unprotective 60 :18
until 85 :16
; 86
:7 ; 87:1 ;
101 :4
unusable 78
:23
unusual 64 :22
up 7:8 ; 11 :18,24 ; 13 :24 ;
14 :11,14 ; 15 :3,5,9,23 ;
16 ;5 ; 17:2,14
; 25 :18 ;
26 :19 ; 34 :18 ; 36 :19 ;
4002 ; 43 ;7 ; 56:8 ; .57;24 ;
'58 :5 ; 59 :8,16,22,24 ;
60 :21,23 ; . 63
:6
; 64 :16 ;
72:12,21 ; 73:2; 79 :20 ;
86:20 ; 91
:14
vertical 73 :15,22
via 2:9.5 ; 93 :4
vicinity 42 :18
violation 5 :3 ; 98 :8
violations 5 :3 ; 23 :18,21 ;
25 :18,21,22 ; 26 :1 ; .29 ;10
virtually 34
:2
; 54 :3
visited 26 :13
visual 70:8 ; 82
:9
; 99:6
visualize 99 :8
vitae 2:18
; 5
:72
votune 37:23
; 45
:17 ;
58
:10 ; 75 ;10
vat uoes
-
20 :20 ; 49 :8
vs
1 :4 ; 105:4
W
--------------------------
wog 35 :7
waive 26 :8
waives 24
:7
wanted 22 :14 ; 63 :13
; 64 :1 ;
71
:1
; 72
:5
; 76:7
; 85:5,9 ;
89 :17
way 14:2 ; 17:19 ; 22:16 ;
36 :14 ; 37:9 ; 38:4 ; 39 :8 ;
42:22 ; 44 :2 ; 49 :15 ;
55 :10 ; 56
:24
; 6D
:3 ; 69:4,
22 ; 77:2 ; 84:14 ; 91 :19 ;
93 :14,16 ; 94 ;7 ; 104 :13 .5,
14
ways 33 :13 ; .95 :18
Wednesday 1 :14
week 18 :20,22 ; 64 :20
welfare 33 :11 ; 34 :21 ;
38 :6,19 ; 70 :7; 74 :17;
92 :3
wells 49 :23 ; 51 :14 ; 71 :5,
10,12 ; 78
:22,23.,24 ;
79 :11,13,16 ; 87 :21,22
;
88 :7,8,9,10,16;-96 :21
west 74 :10 ; 82 :6 ; 84:18
whatever 12 :9 ; 43 :23 ;
46 :22 ; 82 :21,
Whereas 46 :22
WHEREOF 104 ;15 .5
whether 13 :6 ; 21 :8
; 23 :3
;
25 :19 ; 28:6 ; 48:7,9 ;
57:12
; 66 :13 ; 70 :6,11
;
75 :12 ; 84 :23 ; 90:1,3
who's 66:14 ; 68:2
whole 7:9
; 60:20
; 89:21
whom 45
:20
will 9 :13,22
; 19
:10 ;
29 :13 ; 38 :23 ; 43 :16 ;
44:1 ; 45 ;7 ; 55;9 ; 63 :20 ;
83
:7 ; 84:6; 99:13
window 101 :17
winter 86 :13,18; 101 :15
wise 78 :15
withdraw 72 :14 ; 96 :1
withdrawn 51 :13
within 36:3 ; 41 :2
; 43
:18 ;
44 :14 ; 47 :19 ; 48
:1,6,11,
18 ; 51 :9 ; 73:21 ; 93 :6 ;
94 :14
without 39 :7 ; 74 :2 ; 97;12 ;
101
;10
WITNESS 2:13 .5
; 3
:1 ;
24 :22
; 39:23
; 40
:7
;
56 :21
; 57:17 ;_6120 ;-- .
66 :11 ; 98
:17 ; 99 :12 ;
102 :18,23 ; 103 :5,15 ;
104
:15 .5
wonder 15 :16 ; 33 :19 ; 90 :21
wondering 39 :21 ; 99:5
;
100 :6
Woodmen 8 :1
words
15:234;
:216;
:1911 ;
:1417;-:1.13
;
:24 ;. .
.
48 :23 ; 49 :7 ; 51 :24
;
53 :17,22 ; 56 :13 ; 59 :13,
17 ; 60
:22
; 63
:5 ; 64:2;
69:23 ; 74
:24 ; 89 :10
83 :22
worthiness 70 :20
write 78 :2
writing 20 :19
written 6 :19 ; 59 :9 ; 77:10 ;
92 :10
---------------------
Y
yard 40:4,11
; 41
:2,9 ;
94 :6,12
yards 40 :9,15
year 18:13 ; 21 :15;, 23 :3 ;
37:20 ; 42:7 ; 57:20
;
80 :20,21,22 ; 91 :11 ; 95 :7,
13
years 6 :17 ; 8:4
; 9 :8,11 ;
15 :9 ; 36 :5,22 ; 41 :3 ;
42:1 ; 43 :5 ; 46:5 ; 48:2 ;
55:20,23 ; 56 :.4 ; 76 :17 ;
87 :1 ; 90 :17 ; 91 :11,17,18 ;
92 :4,5,8,13,14,23 ; 93
:6,
16
yield 71 :5
------------------Z
zone 36 :3 ; 43 :18 ; 44:20 ;
47 :6,7,11,24 ;: 48 :2,8,9.,
11,12,14,18 ; 49 :20 ;
51 :11,23 ; 79:20 ; 86:3 ;
99 :7,19
; 100 :1
zones 54 :3
----------------------------------------------------
. .-
_ day 105 :19
105
:19
105 :16
105
:20
104 :18
Paste 1 1
warrant 50
:2
warrants 91
:16
work 9
:12 ; 13 :11 ; 14 :15 ;
15 :6,13 ; 21
:4 ; 22 :7,9 ;
waste 6 :10
; 7:3 .13,20 ;
23 :11 ; 29:2
; 31 :1,3 ;
8 :15,20,22 ; 9:19,20
;
34 :5 ; 35 :12
; 65:18 ; 76:7 ;
10 :5,6 ; 14:24
; 20:19 ;
78 :19 ; 79;1,17; 80
:8,9 ;
21 :4,6,12,14,18,19
;
81 :13 ; 83
:7,22
; 86
:2,9,
29 :20,21 ; 36 :4 ; 38 :10,11,
13,16,18,24
; 87 ;4 ; 89 :10,
16,18
; 39 :6 ; 43 :11,12 ;
11,12
; 101
:20
44
:10,16 ; 46
:11,12,15,16, worked 4 :17; 5 :5,23 ; 8 :3 ;
18; 47:4,8 ; 51 :7
; 53:8,
.
12 :16 ; 13:3
16 ; 54 :14 ; 55 :9,10 ;
worker 101 :21
60
:13,14 ; 72 :18 ; 75
:4,8
; workers 101
:19,22
78 :14 ; 93
:23,24 ; 94 :5,8, working 4:20 ; 5 :24 ; 7:16 ;
9 ; 99:9,17; 101 :12,18
8
:17; 9 :24 ; 11 :16 ; 13 :10
;
water 15
:3 ; 25 :23 ; 42 :16,
16:23 ; 21 :11 ; 22:3 ;
20 ; 46 :15
; 48:7,18 ; 51 :8 ;
27:10 ; .52:13
54 :10,12,13 ; 83 :3,6
;
world 36
:9 ; 37 :2
96 :19,20
worth 12 :16 ; . 79
:1 ; 61 :23 ;
underlying 0'
:22
understand 11
:19 ;
13
:16,
17,19 ; 20 :15,16 ; 44 :7,19 ;
59 :15 ; 63 :19 ; 67:19 ;
71 :11 ; 72:13 ; 75 :1 ; 86:7 ;
88:14
;
89:3 ; 91 :21 ; 97:24
understanding 48 :15 ; 49 :5 ;
50:4,14 ; 51 :2 ; 53 :14,18 ;
73 :7,9 ; 89 :19
Union 93 :18
unique 96 :15
unit 15 :4
; 54:5 ; 94 :5,16
74:15 ; 76:11 ; 77:16 ;
78:5 ; 79 :13 ; 85 :2,10 ;
94
:11
; 103:8
up-gradient 78 :24 ; 79 :24
Useful 93 :8
users 42 :18
using 80 :3
Usual 48
:22
utilization 80 :5
utilize 82 :21
utilized 53 :10
V
valid 28:15 ; 71 :5
validity 23 :3
valley 8
;2
Valuable 35
:5
value 54:4,8 ; 68
:15
various 11 :17 ; 53 :19 ;
62 :13
vegetation 23 :20
vehicles 101
:24
venues 3 :23
verify 12 :17
versus 38:13 ; 50 :15 ; 67:7 ;

 
June 7, 2006
INSERT NAME
INSERTADDRESS
INSERT ADDRESS
Subject
:
Morris Community Landfill
Dear
INSERT NAME :
w Eri,tra-risritai, Inc,
Shaw Environmental, Inc .
1150 N
. Fifth Avenue, SuIte C
Sf . Chories, IL 60174-1231
630-762-14CO
Fax : 630 .762 .1402
Shaw Environmental, Inc
. (Shaw) proposes the following scope of service to close the Morris
Community Landfill Parcels A and B in accordance with the requirements of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency permits .
As
the
you
Community
may already
Landfill
know, due
Company
to the
(the
difficult
Operator),
history
the
and
City
negligent
of Morris
performanceassumed
at
on
their
the part
ownof
expense the responsibility for the IEPA required landfill monitoring activities
. The City of Morris
hired Shaw to perform these activities on' their behalf beginning with the third quarter 2005
monitoring period
.
In order to resolve the outstanding )EPA and IPCB compliance issues with the Morris
Community Landfill, the City of Morris will also assume at their own expense the responsibility of
completing the required installation I construction of the leachate management and monitoring
systems, the landfill gas management system, the final cover system, and the stomiwater
management system_ Also, the City of Morris will
assume at their own expense executing all of
the required closure and post-closure activities .
In order to close the Morris Community Landfill in a timely, cost effective manner while still being
protective of the environment, and public health, welfare, and safety, the City of Morris
respectfully requests from the IEPA an allowance for the modification of the permitted
requirements that address.s
the removal of the waste overfill on Parcel B, and installation of the
Parcel A groundwater treatment system . If the IEPA agrees to these allowances, the City of
Morris will take the following actions :
Stop the receipt of waste in Parcel A and begin immediate closure of the landfill
;
Redesign the final landform to
. coincide with the lower waste height / waste volume
across Parcel A, and the higher waste height / volume due to the overfill on Parcel B
;
Redesign the stormwater management systems for Parcels A and B to account for he
modified final landform ;
Construct the final cover system which will exceed federal and state regulations ;
DEPOSifION
EXHIBIT
e-a-g U
.

 
INSERT NAME
Page 2 of 8
June 6, 2006
O - Complete the installation of-all -required taclllty
systems
including leachate rnanagernent
and monitoring systems, and landfill gas management and monitoring systems
;
p Expand the groundwater monitoring system with six (6) new
wells ;
and
0
Develop a Groundwater Management Zone pursuant to 35 Ill . Adm
. Code Part 620250
to address the potential on-site groundwater contamination .
The following scope of service provides in detail the activities outlined above .
SCOPE OF SERVICE -
Tasks 100: Groundwater Monitoring Network
Task 101-ExpandGroundwater
Monitoring Network .
Shaw recommends that an additional five
(5) groundwater monitoring wells be installed to more appropriately monitor and characterize the
groundwater quality upgradient and downgradient from the facility .
These additional wells will
be used to establish the Groundwater Management Zone as described later in Task 103 . Shaw
proposes one (1) additional well upgradient to the facility, and four (4) additional wells
downgradient from the permitted facility property_ Locations of these five additional wells are
presented on Figures 1 and 2, contained in Attachment 1 .
Additionally, Shaw recommends that the nine (9) non-permitted wells that were identified in the
field (G-13E, G109S, P-13W, P-17D, P20S, P-21D, R-109S, R110S, and R111D) located
adjacent to Parcels A and B be added to the groundwater monitoring program as piezometers
.
The piezometers would only be monitoredd for groundwater elevations every quarter at the same
time as the groundwater monitoring wells are sampled . The non-permitted wells to be added as
piezometers are shown on Figure Nos . 1 and 2, contained in Attachment 1 .
Task 102 -
GroundwaterMonitorinqWellAbandonment
Shaw recommends that the six (6)
groundwater monitoring wells identified in the field that could not be correlated to existing boring
logs, as-built diagrams, or any other documentation, be abandoned in accordance with thee
standards in 35 III
. Adm
. Code 811 .316, and decommissioning
and reporting procedures
contained in the Illinois Department of Public Health's (IDPH) Water Well Construction Code, 77
Ill . Adm . Code, Part 920- The proposed wells to be
. abandoned are shown on Figure Nos
. 1 and
2, contained in Attachment 1 .
Task 103 -Repairs toExistinqPermittedGroundwater Monitoring Wells .
Shaw will make the
following necessary repairs to the existing wells as listed below
:
p Install bumper posts at groundwater monitoring well G128 ; and
0 Install Well Caps at groundwater monitoring wells G131, G132, G133, and G136 .
Task 104
Establish Groundwater Manaqement Zone . Shaww recommends establishing a
Groundwater Management Zone (GMZ) pursuant to 35 Ill . Adm . Code Part 620 .250 - in lieu of
the permitted groundwater treatment system- A GMZ is defined as
a
three-dimensional
region
containing groundwater that is being managed to mitigate impairment caused
by the
release of
contaminants from a site. The goal of the GMZ will be to remediate the groundwater to the level
of standards applicable to Class IV groundwater (35 III . Adm . Code Part 620 .430) .
S

 
IPi4FFiTNAME
Page 3 of 8
June 6, 2006
A GMZ
. cannot be estnbl shred v.ithout,)riot approval from tie !EPA
. A written report must he
submitted and evaluated oy the Illinois EPA to determine whether the controls and management
of the GMZ are adequate- Following their review, the IEPA will issue a letter in regard to the
: (1)
adequacy of the GMZ
; (2) the continued management of the GMZ
; and (3) conditions necessary
to ensure that the requirements of 35 III . Adm . Code Part 620 will be met .
The written report must include the following Information
.
-
0 - Identification of specific units (operating or closed) present at the facility for which the
GMZ is proposed ;
C1 A USGS topographic showing the location of the site
A detailed scaled map of the facility clearly delineating the location of each waste
management unit;
0 A description of the geology and hydrogeology within the proposed GMZ and the
surrounding area ;
Groundwater classification at the site ;
O Information regarding the release, including :
-
Identification of the chemical constituents detected in groundwater that are above the
applicable standard in 35 III . Adm
. Code Part 620 ;
A description of how the site has been investigated to determine the source or
sources of the release ;
A description of how groundwater has been monitored to determine the rate and
extent of the release ;
A description of the groundwater monitoring network and groundwater sampling
protocols in place at the facility
;
Thee schedule for monitoring of the groundwater; and
A summary of the results of the groundwater monitoring associated with the release
;
Scaled drawings identifying the horizontal and vertical boundaries of the proposed GMZ
;
Information regarding the approved remedial action including
:
A description of the approved remedial action
;
A description of how the approved remedial action has impacted the release
;
A description of how the approved remedial action is operated and maintained
;
A projected schedule for completion of remediation ;
• A description of how groundwater at the facility will be monitored following the future
completion of the remedy to ensure that the groundwater quality standards have been
attained
; and
A discussion addressing the adequacy of the controls and management of the proposed
GMZ at the site-
Shaw will prepare the written report as outlined above requesting IEPA approval to establish a
GMZ.
Task 105-Conduct Groundwater Monitorinq .
Shaw will continue to conduct routine quarterly
groundwater monitoring at the Morris Community Landfill_ Groundwater monitoring will include
measurement of groundwater elevations, sampling and laboratory testing of groundwater,
analysis of laboratory test results . and IEPA reporting .
I

 
INSERT 1VAME
Page 4 of 8
June 6 . 200E
asks 200 : Leacchitte-Management and Monitoring
Task 201-Complete
LeachateCollection System . Shaw proposes to complete the installation
of the leachate collection systems for Parcels A and B with the system features that have been
permitted by IEPA but not yet installed
. The following list represents these features :
Parcel A
• Perimeter leachate collection piping,
drainage layer, and associated manholes (L305,
L306, and L307), leachate collection trench sumps (L313, and L314), and leachate
extraction wells (1-311, and 1-312) :
Parcel 8
Leachate conveyance lines for the perimeter manholes, and leachate extraction wells
(L303, L309, and L310) ; and
Parcel A & 8
0 Leachate storage tank to store leachate collected from both Parcels A and B and
conveyance piping to the existing sanitary sewer line
.
Task 202- Complete Leachate Monitoring System. Shaw proposes to complete the installation
of the leachate monitoring system which includes the installation of the following leachate
monitoring points :
Parcel A :
Leachate Collection Manholes (Task 201) : 1-305, L306, and L307 for environmental
sampling / testing ; .
• Leachate Collection Trench Sumps (Task 201) : L313 for measuring
. leachate head
elevations, and L314 for measuring leachate head elevations and for environmental
sampling /testing ;
Leachate . Extraction Wells (Task 201)
: L311 and L312 for measuring leachate head
elevations; and
Parcel B :
0 Leachate Extraction Wells (Task 201) : L303, L309, and L310 forr environmental sampling
/ testing .
Task203-Construction Quality Assurance Report
Shaw will prepare the Construction Quality
Assurance Report upon completion of Tasks 201 and 202 as required by the IEPA and the
IPCB for the leachate management and monitoring
system-
Task-204 Conduct Leachate Monitoring . Shaw will continue to conduct routine quarterly
leachate monitoring at the Morris Community Landfill . Leachate monitoring will include
measurement of leachate head elevations, sampling and laboratory testing, analysis of test
results, and IEPA reporting
.
Task300 : Final Cover System and Final Landform
Task 301-Verification ofExistinqPermitted FinalCover.
Shaw will inspect the landfill to verify
areas that have had the permitted final cover system installed . Shaw will lay out a grid system
based on the site coordinate -system- and the existing site topographic survey, with 25 to 50
6

 
!IVSERT I/ld1WE
Page 5 of 3
June 6, 2(",06
probe points ti ;probe point for every
2-4 acres) to obtain field measurements of the final cover
system thickness, Assuming that appropriate thicknesses are confirmed of the low permeability
soil layer at the various probe points, Shaw will next collect soil samples at 2 -
4 locations for
laboratory testing of moisture content, and soil classification, Assuming the thickness and
quality of soil material are appropriate as permitted, Shaw will then push several tubes into the
final cover soils to obtain undisturbed samples for hydraulic conductivity testing
. Based on the
results of this investigation, Shaw will prepare a report with the Findings and
conclusions.
Task 302 Design ofAlternateFinalCover System .
Shaw will prepare the design for an
alternate final cover system for Parcels A and B that will tie into areas of the landfill having
permitted final cover
. The final cover system will consist of a low-permeability layer to prevent
precipitation from entering the landfill, and a protective soil layer to prevent erosion and maintain
the long-term integrity of the landfill cover system.
The low-permeability layer will include a 40-mil LLDPE geomembrane and a one (1) foot layer of
recompacted low permeable day soil . The permeability of the 40-mil LLDPE
combined with the
recompacted clay soil will meet or exceed the ]EPA required 3-foot clay finer having a
permeability of 1x10'' cm/sea A geocomposlte drainage net
will overlay the geomembrane to
drain precipitation away from the low-permeability layer . The protective layer will be placed over
the geocomposite and will include a minimum of three (3) feet of protective soil, with the upper
six (6) inches being a vegetative layer .
Task 303- Design Final Landform and Stormwater ManagementSystem .
Shaw will modify and
design the permitted final landform and stormwater management systems for Parcels A and B
.
The redesigned final landform will take into account the lower waste height and waste volume in
Parcel A, and the overfill volume left in place in Parcel B
. The final landform will be designed to
promote drainage of surface water runoff away from the landfill in order to minimize infiltration
into the waste mass .
Shaw will redesign the stormwater management system taking into account the revised final
landform and the resulting final grades
. The stormwater management system will be designed
to do the following :
M Facilitate drainage and reduce the potential for erosion of the final landform
;
o Detain, manage, and control the release of a 25-year, 24-hour storm event
; and
O Facilitate sedimentation of collected runoff thereby improving water quality .
Task 304- Install Final Cover and StormwaterManagementSystem.
Shaw will oversee the
installation / construction of the final cover system and stormwater management system
. Shaw
will prepare the requiredd construction quality assurance and quality control documentation to be
submitted to the IEPA as part of the final cover certification .
Task 400 : Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring
Task 401-Parcel A Landfill GasEvaluation, Shaw proposes to conduct a test program to
evaluate and characterize the landfill gas production from Parcel A in order to assess whether
an active or passive gas collection system is required for Parcel A . Since historical records _
indicate that only construction and demolition debris was lendfilled in Parcel A, the landfill gas
co

 
Uy'SE,T I' N,a111E
Page 6 of 6
June 6, 2000
o:oducuor. may be such hat only a passive eofection systern is needed .
However, field tesbrrg
rdI! need to be dore to accurately characterize gas production rates prior to
developing a
system design .
Task 402-DesionofParcel A Landfill Gas ManaqementSystem.
Shaw will design the Parcel A
landfill gas collection system based on the results of field testing and evaluation performed
in
Task 401
Task403.-Complete Installation of Parcel BLandfillGasManagement
System. Shaw will
oversee the completion of the Parcel B landfill gas management system
installation . The
following activities will occur during the installation and startup of the landfill gas management
system:
Installation of the landfill gas blower / flare station and connection to the existing landfill
gas collection system
;
Evaluation of the existing landfill gas collection system to determine vacuum distribution,
individual cell flow, gas quantity and quality, and'headerfunction ;
Any necessary repairs and/or modifications that were identified from the evaluation will
be performed to optimize the performance of the landfill gas management system . Also,
a system calibration will be done to optimize the efficiency of the system .
Task404 InstallLandfillGas Management System . Shaw will install the landfill gas
management systems for Parcel A and B, and will prepare all required
. construction quality
assurance and quality control documentation for submittal
to the IEPA . For purposes of
estimating costs it is assumed that a passive landfill gas collection system will be required for
Parcel A, and the IEPA permitted Parcel B landfill gas collection system will not require
modification .
Task 405'-Repairsto Existing LandfillGas Probes . Shaw will install bumper posts at landfill
gas probes X-125
; X-126, X-126, X-128 .
Task 406 Conduct LandfillGasMonitorinq. Shaw will continue to conduct routine monthly
landfill gas monitoring and reporting at the Morris Community Landfill . Landfill gas monitoring
will included field sampling and testing of landfill gas probes, ambient air sampling and testing,
analysis of test results, and JEPA reporting . (Note that the budgeted costs for Task 404 cover
only 1 year of monitoring - the time estimated to close the landfill
. Budgeted costs for Task
504, cover the monitoring costs for the 30 year post closure care period)
.
Task 500
:
Post Closure
Care Activities .
.
Task 501-Conduct Routine Inspections and Maintenance . Shaw will conduct the routine
facility inspections
: quarterly from post closure years 1 through 5, and annually from post
closure years 6 through 30
. These inspections will be conducted to identify and document any
areas of the final landform / final cover system that have been compromised requiring repair or
maintenance, and any facility systems that require repair or maintenance . Costs budgeted for
Task 501 will include the costs for the following routine maintenance and operations'~ repair of
cover system, and mowing of vegetation .
Task
502-'Groundwater'Moniiorinq .
Shaw will '
continue to conduct routine quarterly
groundwater monitoring at -the Morris Community Landfill
. Groundwater monitoring will include
S

 
Ii/SEPT NAME
meatsure[T1an-al';sis
of
:Br~ilaboratory
of C.lrcundVvater
tesi rz;alrs,
elevations,
and IF=.PA
reporting53mh(ir:`
.
onl
!
Dratory testing of groundwater,
Task 503-LeachateManagementandMonitoring
.
Shaw will continue to conduct routine
quarterly leachate monitoring at the Morris Community Landfill
. Leachate monitoring will include
measurement of leachate head elevations, sampling and laboratory testing, analysis of test
results, and EPA reporting
.
Task 504- Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring
.
Shaw will continue to conduct routine
landfill gas monitoring at the Morris Community Landfill
: monthly from post closure years 1
through 5, and quarterly from post closure years 6 through 30
. Landfill gas monitoring will
include field sampling and testing of landfill gas probes, ambient air sampling and testing,
analysis of test results, and IEPA reporting .
BUDGET
The proposed budget for implementing Tasks 100 through 500 is presented in Attachment 2
and is based on our 2006 Fee Schedule .
If you should have any questions, please contact Jesse Varsho or
me at (630) 762-1400 .
Very truly yours,
Shaw Environmental, Inc
.
Devin A
. Moose, P.E„ DEE
Director
Page T 01'3
6, ?006

 
SCHEDULE OG'
URE ACTIVITIES
AT THE
f tf~f3#;',> tr? i 7t)Pil f1' L
.,'1i 1DFILL
.. PARCELS A & B
The proposed schedule assumes that the following on-going tasks will be completed on a monthly
or quarterly schedule,
as noted : .
Complete routine quarterly groundwater monitoring
(Task 1_05) ;
Complete routine quarterly leachate monitoring (Task
204) ;
Complete routine monthly landfill gas sampling (Task
406)
; and
Annual Reporting (Annual Report, Tasks 105, 204,
and 406)_
Fall 2006
($96,900)
Establish
review and
Groundwater
approval (Task
Management
104)
;
Zone (GMZ) report
and submit to IEPA for
Abandon six groundwater monitoring wells (Task 102)
;
Repair existing groundwater monitoring wells (Task
103);
Prepare permit modification request regarding groundwater
monitoring network for
IEPA review and approval (Tasks 101) ;
Repair existing landfill gas monitoring probes (Task 405)
; and
Verify the installation of any existing final cover for Parcels
A and B_ This includes
collecting Shelby tubes for hydraulic conductivity analysis
and determining thickness
with probe points within a grid .
Complete report of
findings (Task 301) .
0
Winter 2006-2007 ($70,700)
Respond to IEPA comments on revisions to groundwater monitoring
network and
GMZ (Tasks 101) ;
Install five groundwater monitoring wells (Task 101)
;
Add nine non-permitted wells into groundwater monitoring
network as piezometers
(Task 101) ;
Design -
alternate
final cover system (if required), including tie-ins
to existing final
cover and revision to waste boundary based on existing waste
limits for Parcels A
& B (Task 302) ; and
ci
Design final landform, stormwater management system,
and perimeter leachate
collection system for Parcel A (Task 303) .

 
rinq 2007 ($186,500)
0
Submit permit modification request lo IEPA regarding alternate final cover, final
landform, stormwater management system, and perimeter leachate collection
system (Tasks 302 and 303) ;
0
Install landfill gas blower/ flare station at Parcel B
. Connect with the existing gas
collection system (403) ;
Begin evaluation of existing landfill gas collection system for Parcel B to determine
vacuum distribution and individual cell flow, gas quantity and quality, and header
function (Task 403) ; and
0
Respond to comments regarding permit modification request to IEPA regarding
alternate fnaf cover, final landform, stormwater management system, and perimeter
leachate collection system (Tasks 302 and 303)
.
Summer 2007
($186,500)
Complete evaluation of existing landfill gas collection system for Parcel B (Task
403) ;
0
Q
Complete any necessary repairs to the Parcel B landfill gas collection system to
optimize performance of landfill gas collection (Task 403)
; and
Prepare and submit CQA documentation report to ]EPA for Parcel B landfill gas
management system (Task 403)_
Fall 2007 ($701,600)
0
Install leachate storage tank for Parcels A and B (Task 201)
;
LI
Construct Parcel A perimeter leachate collection system and associated manholes
(Tasks 201 and 202)
:
Install Parcels A and B leachate extraction wells (Tasks 201 and 202)
;
Install leachate conveyance piping for Parcels A & B (Task 201)
;
Prepare and submit CQA documentation report to IEPA for Parcel B leachate
conveyance system (Tasks 203 and 304) ; and
Respond to IEPA comments on Parcel B landfill gas management system report
(Task 403),

 
Winter 2007-200!1
Winter 2008
O
Respond to IEPA comments regarding the design the Parcel A landfill gass collection
system (Task 402) .
Spring-Fall 2009
($1,905,000)
E3
Construct 25 acres of Parcel B final cover system and submit COA Report (Task
304); and
Construct Parcel A landfill gas collection system and submit CQA report (Task 404)
.
Spring 2010 ($887,900)
Construct final 15 acres of Parcel B final cover system and submit CQA Report
(Task 304)
; and
Begin
excavating any required stormwater control features and stockpiling soils as
necessary for Parcel A final cover construction (Task 304)
.
Sprinq 2008 ($15,000)
Field test the Parcel A landfill gas collection system to determine whether gas is
passively or actively collected (Task 401) ; and
0
Begin construction of Parcel B final cover (Task 303)-
Summer-Fall 2008 ($902,900)
Construct 15 acres of Parcel B final cover system and submit CQA Report (Task
304) ; and
Design Parcel A landfill gas collection system based on results of field testing and
evaluation and feedback from the IEPA on the alternate final landform
. Submit
permit modification request to IEPA for Parcel A landfill gas collection system (Task
402) . .
Summer= Fall 2010
($592,000)
Begin excavating any required stormwater control features and stockpiling soils as
necessary for Parcel A final cover construction (Task 304) ; and
O
Q
Respond to IEPA comments on CQA report of Parcel B leachate and landfill gas
collection systems (Task 203 and 404)-
Q
Construct 10 acres of Parcel A final cover system and submit COA Report (Task
303) .

 
Siring
-Fs11
20'11 (e 92,_)9-)
Li
Construct 10 acres of Parcel A final cover system and submit CQA Report (Task
303).
Sprinq-Fall
2012 ($592,000)
G
Construct 10 acres of Parcel A final cover system and submit CQA Report (Task
303) .
Complete Parcel A final cover system and associated stormwater controls such as
downchutes (Task 304) .
Sprinq-Fall 2013
O
Respond to IEPA comments regarding CQA report to Parcel A final cover (Task
203).
Post-Closure Period (30 Years)
($2,662,400 or 88,700 per year)
. .
0
Conduct Routine Inspections and Maintenance (Task 501)
;
Conduct routine groundwater monitoring (Task 502) ;
Conduct routine leachate monitoring (Task 503)
; and
O
Conduct routine landfill gas monitoring (Task 504),
Q

 
b .'
w
M}
tl~wza!~
aw'
Shaw Environmental, Inc.
1.
Introduction
Site Background .
A.
Key Facts
B.
Site History
Permitted versus Constructed Design
1 .
Overliner System
Design
u .
Constructed
2.
Leachate Collection System
Design
ii
.
' '
Constructed
Final Cover System
i.
Design
ii.
Constructed (3 .75 acres certified closed)
4.
Landfill Gas Collection System
i .
' Design
ij
Constructed
iii.
Landfill Gas Exceedances
Groundwater Monitoring Network
r
19 Elcisting/Permitted Groundwater Monitoring Wells and 2
Piezometers (G136 used for both Parcels A & B)
u.
Groundwater Flow
iii .
Groundwater Quality/Exceedances
IIh
Recommended Closure Tasks
A.
Exemptions from Permit Conditions
1 .
STOP accepting waste and initiate closure activities
2.
Overfill of Parcel B
i.
Leave in-place
n .
Overfill volume is approximately 475,000 cubic yards
iii.
Parcel A remaining volume is approximately 759,400 cubic yards
3 .
Parcel A Groundwater Remediation System
Pump and Treat system
ii .
Not installed, propose not to install
iii.
Permit requires 100 years of operation
FAProtects\2004\112005-Morris~CoaespondenceAagcndao61306
.
Page J of2
Agenda June 13, 2006

 
Gra uud -x
.-a--r
i .7:or
r c,;? Tlzrwurk
Expand Existing Groundwater Monitoring Network
v
Abandonment of Non-permitted Groundwater Monitoring Wells
iii .
Repairs to Existing Permitted Groundwater Monitoring Wells
iv
Establish Groundwater Management Zone
V
Conduct Groundwater Monitoring
2
Leachate Management and Monitoring
i .
Complete Leachate Collection Systems for Parcels A & B
Complete Leachate Monitoring Systems
iii_
Complete Construction Quality Assurance Report
iv.
Conduct Leachate Monitoring
3.
Final Landform and Final Cover System
i.
Design of Alternate Final Cover System
ii.
Verification of Existing Permitted Final Cover
iii .
Design of Final Landforrn and Stonmwater Management System
rv.
Construct Final Cover and Stormwater Management System
Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring
i.
Parcel A Landfill Gas Evaluation
ii .
Design of Parcel A Landfill Gas Management System
iii.
Complete Installation of Parcel B Gas Management System
iv.
Install Landfill Gas Management System
v_
Repairs to Existing'landfill Gas Probes
vi .
Conduct Landfill Gas Monitoring
Post-Closure Activities
Conduct Routine Inspections and Maintenance
ii .
Groundwater Monitoring
iii .
Leachate Management and Monitoring
iv.
Landfill Gas Management and Monitoring
Schedule
IV
.
Questions
T''Prol ects\2004!.7 12005 -
M omsACol7rwc~den ce`,apenda 067 3 OF wp d
Page 2 of 2

 
I
T,rn,
7115-IACrtisklcaure_acIIWIja,Shawcostr
4 cc
alt 6 .,4s
TO
SHAW ENVIRONMENTAL,
PROVIDE SERVICES
FOR THE MORRIS
INC. BUDGET
TO THE CITY OF MORRIS
COMMUNITY LANDFILL
Task Description
Cost
s.El
e a
-'~~
r,
d
3
' ' i
f
Task 1101 -
Expand
Groundwater
• MonitoringNetwork
. .
.---
-
$2
.
8,1641
'14,700?
1$-I ,050!'---
i25 tjpp
'--
-- 'i
'C8 a41
P,ri , ;U7!
;
° C
------------- --
746,567
y5n
000
p7 _o0o~
Task,
Task 103102 -Grounwater
Repairs
to
. .-Existing
.
.-_Monitoring
._ Monitoring
Well
----------------------AbendonmentWells--
-----•
, ••.
,--
of
•-IEPAsIgnifcantpenn)t--- •---
. .
, mod;fication
--
•' _-'
app)icatlon)
' '----
Task 104
: Establish Groundwater Management Zone
.-
• -
.
••
, _'
• •_
, ._
••.
•_ - . .___
•- •
_ •- •' _ ••
_
__
.' _ -----------
Subtotal
., .
:
Task 105 Conduct Groundwater
_
Monitoring (cost Included
~,
Task 201
:Complete Leachale Collection System
Task 202 Complete Leachale Monitoring System (ccvt)nduded
Task 203 Prepare Construction Quality Assurance
Task 204
-
Conduct Leachte Monitorin
Task 301 _ Verification of Existing Permitted Final Cover
Task 302
Design
Alternate Final Cover
--•-System•-
---
g
Subtotal :
In Task 502)
In Task tot)
Report
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
System
. .
.---
---------------
Task 303 _Design Final Landform and Stormwaler ManagemenE
Task 3d4
- Install / Construct Final Cover and Stormwater
System
Management Systems (includes CQA documentation
.
.nland
Final Cover Certification)
- -----
i0
nr
7
-
$s%7,0001
.
15,000]
`
372,900
3 ----"'
$125,000'
----------------b3,000
d4O,900
I
., , 3,
--
-1,_7'
,u,~ ,n J0
;
1
y i
. 110 0'10 :
2,3001
9721
, .
a k
-
allatlon of Par
ndfdl Gas Mana emen to
u
c,
----
Subtotal :
Subtotal :
TOTAL
:
IF
)q
i
Task 501 - Conduct Routine Inspections and Maintenance
Task 502 -Conduct Routine
. . . Groundwater
. Monltonnq•
.
-
Task 503 -
Conduct Routine
_
Leachale Management
.
---
. .. • . ..•. . • •••
• .- •
. .
.• •
.
-
Tas 504 - Con u c Routine
utl-•_ Landfill
•- Gas
Management•
. . ..
Monitoring Operations
and
Monitoring Operations
and_
.
.---•---
. -
.
• •••
. ••, •-• ••••-_•---• .
•••-• ••-
•---•--- -

 
HUNISHAIN
& C U
L' SHE'-R T_ S O N L CFA
TO:
COMPANY :
Bradley Halloran
IPCB
FROM :
Charles F . Helsten
HARD COPY
: Original Will Not Be Sent
If you do not receive the number of pages listed above, please call 815490-4900
. The documents that accompany this facsimile contain
confidential and privileged information aad are intended Solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom this transmission Is
directed
. Any disclosure of the information herein is unauthorized and strictly prohibited
. If you arc not the intended recipient of this
facsimile, please respond by facsimile to the number above or call the sending operator at our expense immediately so that we may
arrange for the return of this document to us at no cost to you. Thank you .
I3iashaw & Culbertson LLP is an Illinois rvy;istered limited liability partncrshlp that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform
Partnership Act (1997) .
September 28, 2006
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
RECERFEO
CLERKS OFFICE
2 2006
ATTOIOIL" AT. LAW
STATE OF ILLINOI
400 Park Avenue
Box 1189_
Pollution Control
Boa,
ckford, IL 61 lab-1339
T 815-490-4900
F 815-490-4901
%s w .hinshawlaw.corn
FAX NO .;
PHONE NO
312-814-3669
USER ID :
5263
MATTER NAME :
City of Moms
MATTER NO .:
806289
NO . OF PAGES (Including this Cover) :
4
SENDING OPERATOR :
Danita Heaney
RETURN TO : (other than above)
COMMENTS: IF AIRY :

Back to top