ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    June 15, 2006
     
     
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
     
    Complainant,
     
    v.
     
    LAIDLAW CORPORATION, an Illinois
    corporation,
     
    Respondent.
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    PCB 06-2
    (Enforcement – Land)
     
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by T.E. Johnson):
     
    On July 6, 2005, the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the State
    of Illinois (People), filed a complaint against Laidlaw Corporation, an Illinois Corporation
    (Laidlaw). The complaint alleges that Laidlaw violated Sections 21(f)(1), (f)(2), and (i) of the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/21(f)(1), (f)(2), and (i) (2004)); and 35
    Ill. Adm. Code 703.121(a), 722.111, 722.134(a)(4), 722.140(c), and 725.116 by not maintaining
    records of test results for the waste paint liquid for at least three years; by determining that the
    waste paint liquid was non-hazardous without supporting documentation; by storing hazardous
    waste in violation of regulations adopted by the Board; by conducting a process which produces
    hazardous waste in violation of regulations or standards adopted by the Board; by not conducting
    employee training on updated hazardous waste management procedures; and by storing
    hazardous waste without a permit.
     
    The People allege that the violations occurred at Laidlaw’s manufacturing facility located
    at 5326 Industrial Park Road, Metropolis, Massac County. The Board accepted the complaint for
    hearing on July 21, 2005.
     
    On April 28, 2006, the People and Laidlaw filed a stipulation and proposed settlement,
    accompanied by a request for relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1) of the Act.
    415 ILCS 5/31(c)(1) (2004). These filings are authorized by Section 31(c)(2) of the Act. 415
    ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2004).
    See
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.300(a). Under the proposed stipulation,
    Laidlaw admits the violations alleged in the complaint, and agrees to pay a civil penalty of
    $25,000.
     
    The Board provided notice of the stipulation, proposed settlement, and request for relief
    from hearing. The Board published newspaper notice in the
    Metropolis Planet
    on May 10, 2006.
    The Board did not receive any requests for hearing. The Board grants the parties’ request for
    relief from the hearing requirement.
    See
    415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    103.300(b).
     

     
    2
    Section 103.302 of the Board’s procedural rules sets forth the required contents of
    stipulations and proposed settlements. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.302. These requirements include
    stipulating to facts on the nature, extent, and causes of the alleged violations and the nature of the
    respondents’ operations. Section 103.302 also requires that the parties stipulate to facts called
    for by Section 33(c) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/33(c) (2004)), which bears on the reasonableness of
    the circumstances surrounding the alleged violations.
     
    As previously stated, Laidlaw admits the violations alleged in the complaint, and agrees
    to pay a civil penalty of $25,000. The stipulation also addresses the factors of Section 42(h) of
    the Act (415 ILCS 5/42(h) (2004),
    as amended by
    P.A. 93-575, (eff. Jan. 1, 2004), which may
    mitigate or aggravate the civil penalty amount. The People determined that a civil penalty of
    $25,000 was appropriate.
     
    The People and Laidlaw have satisfied Section 103.302. The Board accepts the
    stipulation and proposed settlement.
     
    This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
     
    ORDER
     
    1. The Board accepts and incorporates by reference the stipulation and proposed
    settlement.
     
    2. Laidlaw Corporation, an Illinois Corporation (Laidlaw) must pay a civil penalty
    of $25,000 within 10 days from the date of this order.
     
    3. Laidlaw must pay the civil penalty by certified check, money order or electronic
    funds transfer, payable to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund. The case
    number, case name, and respondents’ federal employer identification or social
    security numbers must be included on the certified check or money order. If
    submitting an electronic funds transfer to the Agency, the electronic funds transfer
    must be made in accordance to the specific instructions provided to respondents.
     
    4. Laidlaw must submit the certified check, money order or electronic funds transfer
    to:
     
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services Section
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    P.O. Box 19276
    Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
     
    5. A copy of the certified check, money order or record of the electronic funds
    transfer and any transmittal letter must be sent to the following:
     
     

     
    3
    Ms. Kristen Laughridge Gale
    Assistant Attorney General
    Environmental Bureau
    500 South Second Street
    Springfield, Illinois 62702
     
    Mr. James Kropid
    Assistant Counsel
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    P.O. Box 19276
    Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
     
      
      
    6. Penalties unpaid within the time prescribed will accrue interest under Section
    42(g) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/42(g) (2004)) at the rate
    set forth in Section 1003(a) of the Illinois Income Tax Act. 35 ILCS 5/1003(a)
    (2004).
     
    7. Laidlaw must cease and desist from the alleged violations.
     
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
     
    Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may
    be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the
    order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2004);
    see also
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906, 102.706.
    Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the Illinois
    Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. The
    Board’s procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its final
    orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    101.520;
    see also
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
     
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
    adopted the above opinion and order on June 15, 2006, by a vote of 4-0.
     
     
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
     

    Back to top