1. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTlON CONTROL BOARD
      2. NOTICE OF FILING
      3. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
      4. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS
POLLUTlON CONTROL BOARD
In the Matter of
1
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
1
SPECIAL WASTE REGULATIONS
1
CONCERNING USED OIL,
1
35.
Ill. Adm. Code, 808, 809
1
1
NOTICE OF FILING
To:
ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
that on May 16, 2006 we filed the attached
PRE-FILED
TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER HARRIS
with Dorothy
Gum, Clerk of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board, a copy of
which is herewith served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
NORA, AN ASSOCIATION OF RESPONSIBLE
RECYCLERS
By:
//Claire A. Manning
Claire A. Manning, one of its attorneys
BROWN, HAY
&
STEPHENS, LLP
Claire A. Manning, Esq.
Registration No.
3
124724
205 S. Fifth Street, Suite 700
P.O. Box 2459
Springfield, IL 62705-2459
(217) 544-8491
(217)241-3111
([ax)
Cmani~inp@,bhslaw.con~
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing PRE-FILED
TESTIMONY OF
CHRISTOPHER HARRIS
was filed, electronically, with the Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, and with copies of such
nde proposal being placed in the U.S. mail on May 16,
2006 and addressed to:
DOROTHY
GUNN
Clerk of the Board
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
6060
1
TIM FOX
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Stephanie Flowers
Division of Legal Counsel
102 1 North Grand Avenue
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
ILLLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
William Richardson
Chief Legal Counsel
One Natural Resources Way
Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271
OFFICE OF THE ILLINOIS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Matthew J.
Dunn
188 W. Randolph St., 20" Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY GROUP
Deirdre K. Hirner
Executive Director
3
150 Roland Avenue
Springfield, Illinois 62703
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
In the Matter of
)
SPECIAL WASTE REGULATIONS
CONCERNING USED OIL,
35.
Ill. Adm. Code, 808, 809
PRE-FILED
TESTIMONY OF CHRISTOPHER HARRIS
My
name is Christopher Harris.
I have the privilege of serving as General Counsel to
NORA, An Association of Responsible Recyclers.
On behalf of NORA, I would like to express
our appreciation for the opportunity to offer additional views of the rule proposal in this matter.
The purpose of my testimony today is to demonstrate that manifesting shipments of used oil (and
materials regulated as used oil) is not necessary for the protection of human health and the
environment.
Therelore, NORA respectfully requests that Illinois discard the
used oil manifest
requirement
and thereby remove an unnecessary and expensive paperwork
burden on the used oil
generators and transporters in this state.
NORA
is a national trade association whose
meinbers provide recycling
services
throughout
the entire United States including Illinois.
In addition to collecting and recycling
used oil, NORA members collect and recycle oil filters, wastewater, antifreeze and parts cleaning
solvents.
NORA was founded in December 1984 and has participated in all of
EPA's
rule-
making activities concerning used oil conducted by the United States
Environmeiltal Protection
Agency ("US
EPA"), beginning with the first set of used oil management standards that were
promulgated in November 1985.
To provide some background to
NORA'S position, I would
like to briefly review the
origins of the used oil regulatory system in the United States. The enactment by Congress of the
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

Used Oil Recycling Act of 1980 marked the first legislative effort to address the unique
challenge of used oil.
In the Congressional "findings" that serve as the predicate for this law,
Congress determined that (I) used oil is a valuable source of increasingly scarce energy; (2)
technology exists to reprocess and recycle used oil; and (3) that used oil constitutes a threat to
public health and the
envirounent when disposed of improperly. 42 U.S.C. 6901; See
nlso
H.R.
Rep. No 1415,
96" Cong., 2d Sess., 10 (1980); S. Rep. No. 879,
96''' Cong.,
2d Sess. 1 (1980).
Because the
US. Environmental Protection Agency failed to issue any regulations to implement
the 1980 statute, Congress, as part of the 1984 RCRA reauthorization, specifically directed the
EPA
to establish
a used oil regnlatory program governing the generation, marketing,
transportation and recycling of used oil. 42 U.S.C. 6935.
The legislative history of the 1984 Congressional mandate makes clear that "where
protection of human health and
the environment can be assured..
..the [EPA] Administrator
should make every
effort not to discourage recycling
or used oil. For example, if there are
several alternative
conlrols that would be environmentally acceptable, the
Agency should allow
those which would be least likely to discourage used oil recycling." H.R. Rep. 1133, 98"' Cong.,
2d Sess., 114 (1984). Responding to this directive, EPA promulgated the basic regulations
governing used oil management in November 1985 and followed up with a more comprehensive
set of regulations in September 1992.
These regulations, codified at 40 CFR Part 279, are
usually referred to as "the used oil management standards" or as the "Part 279 regulations." The
regulations have
been
adopted
in
Illinois pursuant
to
this Board's
idelltical-in-substallce
rulemalting authority, and are found at 35
111. Adm. Code Part 739.
The component of the used oil management standards we are concerned about today is
the record-keeping requirement for shipments of used oil. Under the federal and corresponding
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

state requirements, transporters are required
to maintain records (for at least three years)
documenting the acceptance and delivery of each
used oil shipment. Records for each shipment
must include: (1) the date of shipment; (2) the name, address and EPA Identification Number (if
applicable) of the entity who provided the
used oil for shipment; (3) the quantity and type of
used oil accepted; and (4) the dated signature of the party providing the used oil.
In addition, transporters
must also create and maintain records (for at least three years) of
each shipment of used oil that is delivered to another transporter, fuel marketer, or processor.
Records of each delivery must include: (1) the date of delivery; (2) the name, address and EPA
identification of the receiving facility or transporter; (3) the quantity of
used oil delivered; and
(4) the dated signature of a representative of the receiving facility or transporter.
40 CFR
279.46.
A parallel set of records must be maintained by processors. 40 CFR 279.56;
35
I11.Adm.
Code. Moreover, processors must also maintain an analysis plan which requires comprehensive
records regarding
(I)
any used oil subject to the rebuttable presumption; and (2) analysis
demonstrating meeting the on-specification standards.
This information must be included,
together with reports on any incidents requiring implementation of the contingency plan, in the
operating record and all biennial reports. 40 CFR 279.57.
Finally, all used oil generators must
comply with applicable
US. Department
of
Transportation hazardous material requirements that include identification and classification,
packaging, marking, labeling and manifesting used oil destined for disposal. Transporters of
used
oil
have
to
comply
with
DOT
requirements
governing placarding,
record-keeping,
insurance, and reporting spill incidents. 40 CFR
279.43(b).
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

US EPA has determined that these tracking and record-keeping requirements adequately
protects human health and the environment and pointed out that
"[all1 of this information
[required by the tracking requirements] is currently required in the standard EPA hazardous
waste manifest." 50 Federal Register 49196, November 29, 1985.
In other words, all of the
relevant information concerning used oil shipments is collected, recorded, and available to
regulators; but it was not necessary to impose the burden of a requiring manifest to accompany
each shipment.
Givcn that used oil shipments generally involve more transactions' than
hazardous waste shipments (and each segment of the transportation journey requires a separate
manifest) it was reasonable for EPA to conclude that manifesting used oil shipments was not
necessary.
In this way, EPA fulfilled
the Congressional mandate to choose the regulatory option
that "would be least
likely to discourage used oil recycling." In contrast, the Illinois manifest
requirement for shipment of used oil imposes a significant burden on generators and transporters
of used oil as the testimony of Gregory Ray, Vice President of Crystal Clean, clearly establishes.
As the Board is aware, very few states require manifests for transporting used oil.
(Nearly all of the states have adopted the federal used oil management standards with respect to
tracking requirement.)
None of the states bordering Illinois imposes any manifest requirement
on used oil generators or transporters. It is apparent to NORA that the Part 279
traclting system
(without any manifest requirement) works well.
It does not have any "loopholes" and has not
been subject to abuse. Any question regarding the origination, transportation.
destination,
quantity, and
timeline
ol
any used oil shipment can be answered by the required
docinnents.
Finally, NORA strongly believes that the proposed regulatory change ending the manifest
requirement for used oil should encompass all materials regulated as used oil under 40 CFR Part
'
A shipment of used oil commences with the generator and may be collected from one transporter before being
transcerred to another.
It
may be subsequently stored at a
transfer facility before being sent to a processor.
In
contrast, hazardous waste is typically sent from
the generator directly to the TSD facility.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

239 and 35
I11.Adm. Code Part 739.
The tracking system works effectively to monitor used oil
shipments and does so with equal effectiveness for materials regulated as used oil (such as
oillwater mixtures).
Any advocate of requiring manifests for materials regulated as used oil
should be asked to cite either an actual or theoretical example of how the Part
2791 Part 739
tracking system would NOT function to provide all relevant information and why the manifest
requirement would provide such information.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, NORA respectfully requests that the Illinois
Pollution Control Board amend Parts 808 and 809 of its rules and end the manifest requirement
for used oil and materials regulated as used oil.
Respectfully submitted,
IsIChristopher Harris
Christopher Harris
General Counsel
NORA, An Association of Responsible Recyclers
BROWN, HAY
&
STEPHENS, LLP
Claire
A.
Manning, Esq.
Registration No. 3124724
205 S. Fifth Street, Suite 700
P.O. Box 2459
Springfield,
IL 62705-2459
(2 17) 544-849 1
(217)
241-31
11
(fax)
Cmanninai~bhslaw.coni
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, MAY 16, 2006

Back to top