BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARR E C E IV ED
CLERK'S OFFICE
IN
THE MATTER OF :
)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO )
TIERED APPROACH TO CORRECTIVE
)
ACTION OBJECTIVES )
(35 Ill. Adm. Code 742)
)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of the
Illinois Pollution Control Board the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's FINAL
COMMENTS, a copy of each of which is herewith served upon you
.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
B
Kimberl A. Geving
Assistant Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
DATE: April 13, 2006
NOTICE
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Via First Class Mail)
Matt Dunn
Environmental Bureau Chief
Office of the Attorney General
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, 12 `h Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Via First Class Mail)
(Service List-Via First Class Mail)
R06-10
APR 1 7 2006
(Rulemaking-Land)
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board
Bill Richardson, General Counsel
Illinois Dept. of Natural Resources
One Natural Resources Way
Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271
(Via First Class Mail)
Richard R. McGill, Jr .
Ill. Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Via First Class Mail)
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217)782-5544
RECEIVED
CLERK'S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
APR 1 7 2006
IN THE MATTER OF
:
)
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
R06-10
Pollution Control
Board
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
)
(Rulemaking-Land)
TIERED APPROACH TO CORRECTIVE
)
ACTION OBJECTIVES
)
(35 Ill. Adm. Code 742)
)
FINAL COMMENTS
NOW COMES the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("Illinois EPA" or
"Agency"), by one of its attorneys, Kimberly A . Geving, and pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm .
Code 102.108, respectfully submits these FINAL COMMENTS in the above-captioned
matter to the Illinois Pollution Control Board ("Board")
.
It is the Agency's contention that the proposed amendments filed in this matter
with the Board on September 29, 2005, and the corresponding Errata Sheets 1 through 3
filed subsequent to the initial proposal, constitute technically feasible, economically
reasonable, and well-supported amendments to Part 742 . The Agency believes that the
Board should adopt the proposed amendments in their entirety as submitted by the
Agency, including changes proposed in Errata Sheets I through 3
.
A .
Background
On September 29, 2005, the Agency filed its proposed amendments in the above-
captioned matter to incorporate changes to the rules that are designed to improve or
clarify particular aspects of the Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives
("TACO") methodology. Since the last amendments in 2000, further experience with
using TACO in the Agency's remediation programs and changes in scientific information
on the national level have made it necessary to update various provisions of Part 742
.
1
Over the last 5 years, the Agency compiled a list of revisions that evolved into the
proposed amendments. As was the case in the last amendatory rulemaking to this Part,
many of the changes arose from discussions between the Agency and members of the
regulated community. Others, such as updates to many of the ASTM methods and
adding background values for PNAs, stemmed from new scientific documentation or
studies that were published
.
As always, the Agency had several meetings with the regulated community during the
development of the proposed amendments. With the exception of some issues raised at
hearing concerning acceptable detection limits ("ADLs"), which were not even part of
the Agency's proposal in this matter, we believe that the regulated community's
comments and concerns were incorporated into the draft the Board received last
September and were further refined through the three Errata Sheets filed with the Board
.
B
.
Adoption of the Illinois EPA's Proposal
The Agency believes that it has produced viable amendments that are well supported
by the testimony given by the Agency witnesses . Additionally, Mr. Martin's testimony
also offers support for the Agency's proposal .
The Agency would also like to comment that it supports the proposed amendments
offered by Mr. Gobelman on behalf of the Illinois Department of Transportation
("IDOT") and has no objection to the Board adopting the exact language proposed by
IDOT .
C .
Issues of Concern at Hearing
The Agency believes that there were really two main items that were unresolved at
the hearings . The first item arose with a line of questions from Anand Rao to Tom
2
Hornshaw concerning polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ("PAHs"). The second item
was how to address the ADL issue raised by Mr . Thomas .
1. Cancer Risks for Urban Background Levels of PAHs
At the March 1, 2006 hearing, Mr. Rao asked Dr. Hornshaw a line of questions
regarding the new background values for PAHs and whether there is any concern about
the cumulative effect of similar acting chemicals since some of the PAHs are listed as
similar acting substances (see transcript at pp . 13-14). Dr. Hornshaw replied that the
background levels are probably less conservative than the risk based values ; however, he
stated that the sum of the risks still fall within the acceptable range of 10 -4 to 10-1 .
Mr. Rao then asked if he could look into the issue of whether we should require
an evaluation in Tier I if multiple chemicals show up at a particular site . Dr. Hornshaw
committed to analyzing the data, and his analysis has been compiled into a table that is
attached to these Final Comments as Attachment 1 . The Agency's conclusion remains
unchanged. Even though the total risk for carcinogenic PAHs in the Chicago and EPRI
studies are greater than the Tier I risk levels, they still fall within the acceptable range of
10-4 to 10 -6
.
Therefore, the Agency believes that no changes are necessary to its
proposal in this regard .
2. Acceptable Detection Limits
As the Board is fully aware, the Agency did not have any proposed
amendments to the ADLs in its proposal . However, extensive testimony was provided on
this and related topics at both hearings due to the fact that Mr . Thomas raised the issue at
the first hearing . Additionally, members of the laboratory community (Mr . Thomas, Mr .
Halm, Mr. Truesdale, and Mr. Pronger) provided lengthy testimony at the second
3
hearing. As a result, the Hearing Officer asked the participants to specifically address
how we think those issues should be addressed---whether in another hearing before first
notice, not in this docket at all, or in a sub-docket . The Agency will provide its
preference later in these Final Comments. However, we would first like to comment on
some of the issues raised by Mr. Thomas
.
a. Analytical Limitations Associated with ADLs, MDLs, and
PQLs
Mr. Thomas raised issues that centered on the ability of laboratories to meet the
ADLs that have been required for the last nine years in the TACO rules . He claimed that
routinely used methods cannot meet remediation objectives (or ADLs), or that some
ADLs are not achievable. As shown in Attachment 2 to these Final Comments, there are
labs in Illinois and other states that are certified for most parameters . For the few
parameters where there are no labs certified for Method 8061 A and Method 8131 there
are other methods available . However, the Agency has not encountered these compounds
as constituents of concern .
The goal of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act ("Act") (415 ILCS 5/1 et
seq.) is to ensure that remediation objectives are protective of human health and the
environment. If ADLs are set too high, then the remediation objectives are not protective
and can become meaningless. For example, the remediation objective for
pentachlorophenol (which was discussed in this proceeding) is 1 ppb for groundwater and
30 ppb for the migration to groundwater pathway; however, the ADL for one method
(8270) is 3,300 ppb. The PQL for Method 8270 is even greater than the remediation
objective for the residential soil ingestion exposure route of 3,000 ppb. The I in
1,000,000 cancer risk concentration (from Appendix A .Table H) for groundwater
4
ingestion is
0.71
ppb versus a 50 ppb PQL using Method
8270
.
Both the soil and
groundwater PQLs using Method
8270
are two orders of magnitude greater than the
corresponding risk-based values for pentachlorophenol . Unfortunately, the PQL obtained
by the use of Method
8270
would technically not even achieve a risk level in the 10 -4 to
10-6 range. On the other hand, Method 8151A GC/ECD can achieve a soil ADL of
0.16
ppb and a groundwater ADL of
0.076
ppb, and Suburban and 35 other labs are certified
for that method. Therefore, the Agency believes there are a sufficient number of methods
available to address the remediation objectives . Some labs certified for the appropriate
methods may not be located in Illinois, but consultants still use them for Illinois
remediation sites on a regular basis . Thus, the Agency feels no need to change the ADLs
.
Another issue raised by Mr. Thomas in written testimony and at hearing was the
applicability of ADLs to the Class I groundwater remediation objectives . In his pre-filed
testimony, Mr. Thomas stated that the ADLs were difficult to achieve . During hearing
there was testimony that such stringent ADLs were not needed since no one drinks the
groundwater near remediation sites. Nothing could be further from the truth. The
Agency has encountered thousands of private wells in the vicinity of remediation sites
.
Examples include Lisle, Downers Grove, Beardstown, Carol Stream, and Naperville . To
establish ADLs that don't account for a determination of compliance with groundwater or
drinking water objectives would be a grave disservice to the citizens of Illinois and
arguably would not be protective of human health
.
To the best of our knowledge, there are numerous certified laboratories that are
achieving the ADLs without issue . There are over 300 Site Remediation Program
("SRP") projects and over 1,000 Leaking Underground Storage Tank ("LUST") sites
5
processed yearly. While there may be occasional site-specific complexities, those sites
have not raised any over-arching issues such as those implied in these proceedings
.
b. Filtered Water Samples
Mr. Thomas also said that he did not remember any time when he has received a
filtered water sample for organic analysis (see transcript at pp .42-43). While most
samples are not filtered, there are situations, such as those discussed at hearing, where
samples should be, and are, filtered (e.g., risk assessments). Many samples do not need
to be filtered; however, the Agency believes it has the discretion to allow filtered samples
depending on site-specific conditions
.
c. Reporting of Soil Samples on a Dry Weight Basis
Mr. Thomas commented that converting a sample result to a dry weight basis can
raise its reporting limit (ADL) . Section 742 .225(f) requires samples to be
reported
on a
dry weight basis . It does not mention any particular lab method . Compliance with the
ADL requirement is met if the lab uses the proper lab procedure to meet the ADL in
question. Compliance with the remediation objective is met when the dry weight meets
the objective. The Agency does not believe that converting a sample result (by using a
multiplier based on relative moisture content) obtained on a wet sample to a dry weight
basis has any impact on the reporting limit
.
d. F0 Correction Factor
Mr. Thomas commented at hearing that consultants wanted his lab to provide a
correction factor for converting total organic matter to total organic carbon (F0,) and that
this was not something the lab could provide because they didn't have necessary field
data, etc. While the Agency feels that this is an issue to be resolved between the lab and
6
their clients, it has no objection to providing a factor of 0 .58 in the rules. Section
742.215(a)(1)(B) could be modified by deleting the proposed words "appropriately
adjusted" and replacing them with "multiplied by 0 .58." If someone wished to develop
an alternative correction factor, they could use paragraph (b)(3), which allows for
approval of other methods
.
e .
Allowing Hundreds of Sites to be Closed on Theoretical Data
In Lieu of Analytical Testing to Verify a Site Is Clean
The Agency does not understand this comment . Since the effective date of
TACO, over 1,500 SRP sites and 7,400 LUST sites have been closed in accordance with
TACO. The level of contamination at these sites has been determined to be protective of
human health and the environment .
f. Performance Based Measurement System
Mr. Thomas stated in his pre-filed testimony that the Agency should be taking a
Performance Based Measurement System ("PBMS") approach to analytical requirements
in TACO. This comment apparently refers to a very procedurally rich RCRA program
under USEPA . However, the Agency is unclear as to what specifically is being requested
of us. On page 6 of his pre-filed testimony, Mr . Thomas identified certain elements
(questions that need to be answered, decisions that must be supported by the data, what
level of uncertainty is acceptable, and documentation that must be generated) as part of
the problem. The Agency feels that all of these elements are fundamental to its
remediation programs and are already addressed by TACO and program procedural rules
.
For example, the first element, "questions to be answered by monitoring," is a very basic
and integral part of the SRP, RCRA, and LUST . Monitoring in those programs is not
7
only geared toward determining the nature and extent of contamination, but provides an
estimation of how far contaminants will travel in the future . TACO can also answer
questions about existing risk. The "decisions to be supported by the data" are the
determination of remediation objectives and development of remedial action plans
.
TACO has attempted to minimize the "level of uncertainty" by providing ADLs. The
"documentation to be generated to support this approach," at least with respect to
monitoring, is part of and inherent to the Agency's laboratory certification program . Any
additional effort would be redundant
.
The testimony and comments offered during hearing indicate the reason for the
PBMS would be to allow remediation objectives to be based on what is analytically
achievable as opposed to being risk based. In some cases, this occurs when the lowest
ADL available is still greater than the risk based objective. As the Agency witnesses
testified, there are limited situations when this occurs. To change the structure of TACO
for convenience or for economic reasons would not be consistent with the Act . And as
Mr. Turpin stated at hearing, "
.
. .it was never the intention that the program be able to be
operated only using what some laboratories call routine or common methods . It's
understood that there are times in order to be protective of health and the environment
that more specialized methods would be needed." (see page 73 of the transcript) And as
shown in Attachment 2, there are labs certified to perform nearly every method
;
sometimes they are located in another state
.
D . Conclusion
In conclusion, the Agency believes that its position on matters raised in this
proceeding is well established by the testimony of its witnesses . Additionally, the
8
Agency has attempted in these Final Comments to further clarify and support its position
on those issues that were raised by Mr. Thomas at hearing, even though most of his
testimony addressed issues that were not part of the Agency's original proposal
.
It is the Agency's position that no further hearings should be scheduled in this
docket to address those matters raised by Mr . Thomas, nor should a sub-docket be opened
for that purpose. Instead, the Agency believes that the laboratories should work together
as collective unit to reach a consensus on what they, as a whole, believe should be
changed. If and when the laboratories can agree on a concrete approach that is
technically justified, we would invite them to come to the Agency with that unified
approach, and we would be amenable to giving them our input at that time . However, at
this time, we do not believe that their testimony supports further changes to the rules
.
WHEREFORE, the Agency submits its Final Comments, including the
Attachments, for the Board's consideration and respectfully requests that the Board adopt
the Agency's proposal in its entirety, including all three Errata Sheets
.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
9
Kimber A. Geving
Assistan Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
Dated: April 13, 2006
1021 North Grand Ave. East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
CANCER RISKS FOR URBAN BACKGROUND LEVELS OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC
HYDROCARBONS (PAHs)
NOTE: Total risk for carcinogenic PAHs at TACO Appendix B, Tables 1 and 2 Remediation Objectives is 7 .0E-06; Total risks for
Chicago, EPRI/Metro, and EPRI/Non-Metro levels are 3 .0, 4.9, and 2.1 times greater, respectively, than TACO Tier 1 Risk
.
BaA= Benzo(a) Anthracene; BbF=Benzo(b) Fluoranthene; BkF=Benzo(k) Fluoranthene; BaP=Benzo(a) Pyrene ;
CHR=Chrysene; DahA=Dibenzo(a,h,) Anthracene ; IP=Indeno(I,2,3-c,d)Pyrene
Background concentration proposed for sites within Chicago city limits
.
Background concentration proposed for sites within metropolitan statistical areas other than Chicago
.
Background concentration proposed for sites outside of metropolitan statistical areas
.
PAH
Chicago
Background
Chicago
Background
EPRI-Metro
Background
EPRUMetro
Background
EPRI/Non-Metro
Background Level
(4)
EPRIJNon-Metro
Background Risk
Level
(2)
(mg/kg)
Risk
Level t a t
(mg/kg)
Risk
(mg/kg)
BaA
1 .1
1.2E-06
1 .8
2.0E-06
0.72
8.0E-07
BbF
1 .5
1.7E-06
2 .1
2.3E-06
0.70
7.8E-07
BkF
0.99
1.1E-07
1
.7
1.9E-07
0.63
7.0E-08
BaP
1 .3
1.4E-05
2 .1
2.3E-05
0.98
1 .1E-05
CHR
1 .2
1.0E-08
2.7
3.0E-08
1 .1
1 .0E-08
DahA
0.20
2.2E-06
0.42
4.7E-06
0.15
1 .7E-06
IP
0.86
9.6E-07
1 .6
1.8E-06
0.51
5.7E-07
Total Risk
2.1E-05
3.4E-05
1 .5E-05
3/16/206
H /la.chmer)+
1_
Labaalones Accredterl Fa-80218
Pccdest LaL+orScres of New England
:'Pcco eat Labnalales of New Jersey
Cdunha
. MalylicS Sernces
!.Lab Analytical.
Inc,
TX OMslon
Envlrasnenla Modtaing and TKhndcKjm, Inc,
,Envn}nmental Science Cow.
_
Environs-al
Testing &Cs,4t,ng. Inc
'Envirorwnebics
Ga Coast
. Malyl cal Laborames Inc
.
Iraraon Environmental Senica
ta,caster Labo,atmes, Inc.
Maahon Pelrdeim Canpaiy LLC E,Nrammta Laboraopes
Pace Maytca Services -IN
PACE Mdyllca'
Services .
-
.
ICS
. .
Pace Maybcal Sauces
.
-. MN
(PACE Mayllca Son, Inc . (IMStrial U .~
.
IPDC Labaalmes. Inc
.
SGS Envemmenlal Services Inc
Southeen Petdeum Labaaary Inc MI
I
8021B
Madbaagh
8021B
;Daylon
80218
Rochester
8021B
Houstm
_
80218
Morton Give
8021B
M.JUIa
_
80218
Memphis
80218
St.Leois
80218
Balm Rouge
,LA
80218
Marietta
'.OH
80218
Lancaster
PA
80218
Callettsburg
._
8021B
Iafanapdis
80218
Lenexa
80218
Mnneapdis
, 8021B
,Greenflay_
11
_
80218
Peoria
80218
Anchorage
.AK
8021B
Tmverse Qty
MI
~S,.Wem . Paidexn Laboratory Inc
TX
.
__
.
. .80218
m
,TK
STL &Mao
I
8021B
'.knhe,et
NY
STL Chcago
Un_ivesny Pads
I
ISTL Denver
. .
.
. 80210
J ade
CO
3
116
12006
'STL North Cad.
STL Pensacda
STL Savannah
S
TL SL Lcuis
~Test%naica Analytical Tasting Cap. -IA
TesLAmeiica Mayt cal Testing Cap.
- IL
Te tNnaica Malylical Testing Cap. -TN
TesWnenira Analytical Testing Cap. -WI
TMI MaIyticd Services, LLC
T1iMarix La0oraaies, Inc.
US
Bosyslams, Inc .
USFiIta Fnvimscal Ser4cas
L±aaaies Mcredted Fcr8021B
8021B
North Canton
OH
80218
Pensacola
FL
80218
Smannah
GA
80218
Eath City
80218
Cede Falls
A
80218
Mao
Grove
IL
80218
Nehmlle
TN
80218
Waletavn
WI
80218
:Splnglidd
'.IL
80218
Grad Rapids
'MI
80218
Boca Baton
FL
80218
Rottedvd
M
Page 2 of 2
LabaaWiee
Accredled Fa8061A
8061A
Page 1 d 1
3t1&2006
Lebaatones Accro ted Far 8070A
_ e
. . s
STL Denver
W
.
pn,"da
Page 1 of 1
3/1612006
Labaataies Accredted ForBO81A
' .Maibaragh
.
. Dayton
L.NJ
MIA
M. Vemam ''IL
BO81A
Novi
Ml
8081A
:Rochester
NY
.8081A
'.'Cay
:NC
8381A
IBaaboo
WI
O381A
!Hdlad
'MI
I
8081A
;Houston
7X
.
.
. .
8081A
Nahwlle
IN
8081A
Morlan Grove
IL
.. . .
8081A
iMl Julet
STN
8081A
Memphis
iTN
'Fbelec, Inapaded
i
8381A
iHdt
;MI
FirstEnvironments Labarianes In
MIA
INipavlla
'ilL
General B
resnng taboratanea LLC
_
8081A
Charleston
Grace Andyticd Lab, In .
BMIA
IlBerkdey
IGulf Coast HWNcasLaEOratones In
.. ..
MIA
;BMonRouge
.
.
.~I-A
HeritageEnvmnnentd Servces LLC
-
W81A
fIndalapds
(IN
Kernron
Envmnmentd SeMces
MIA
taster
OH
Lancaster
.
. Labaralones, Inc .
.80B1A
'lanasla
'PA
80B1A
Madsonwlle
[KY
;McCoy B McCoy Labordaies, Inc
.
;ACceest L±aatones of New England
IACCUIest Labadones of New Jersey
iAIIDl_ Inc.
;Clayton Group Services, Inc
.
Gdumda Mdylcal Seonces
,
.
_
.
CompiChem a dv sion of Liberty Analytical Cap
CT Labaatone
blab Ma'ylict . Inc. -MI
vis
ion
s-LabAiSINcal.Inc, T%Dvision
~6npncal tahorelones
lLC
Envimanental VIoNtwng and Technologies, Inc
iEnwravnenld Scene Cap
Envrorvnentd Tasting&Consdhng Inc
~.
8381A
MIA
.
.
(Metropditai Water Recland an Ciatnct Greater Chicago Organics
8081A
fScheum irg
;IL
3'16/2006
NAVE n,
e
&Scmhac LaMralaies Inc .
(
SIN
Pace Analyticalervices
-
PACE MalytS Services -KS
:Pace MSylicS S. ee
PACE MalylcS Services -WI
PDC LatOrataie . Inc
.
Raide Analytical Systems, Incapaaled
~~RTI Labs&alias, Uric
.
ISGSServices I-
ISOlnnem Petroleum Lsbaaloiy Inc TX
STAT Malysis Capaetiat
STL &MSo
STL Chcago
STL
. Denver.
STL Math Cordon
iSTL Perisacda
ISTL PdtstWrgh
STL Savamah
_
.
STL St. Laois
I
SUbaha~ Laborelaies, Inc
.
i
ITetlab
. .Incarpaated
. .
..
.
'.TestAmehca Malytal Testing Cap . -IL
Tes*nerica Analytical Testing Cap
.
-OH
La&, alaies Mcrealted Fa8081A
MIA
MeniIMlle
~;IN
8081A
,Indanapdls
!IN
6081A
~Lenaxa
KS
8081A
Mmeapdis
MN
:
W81A
iIcmbely
. WI
8081A
Peals
~IL ..
8
1A
i
i
fald
IL
MIA
'Uvma
Iml.
W81A
;Anchorage
IAK
MIA
Haostat
;Tx
8081A
CNcago
IL,
MIA
I
Mt
INY
MIA
:Unversily Pat !IL
81A
Aade
CO
v
Page 2 of 3
SOS1A
North Ca tm
iOH
MIA
Pensacole
FL
8081A
~Rttswrgh
PA
:
6g81ASa+a»ah
GA
Bp81A
iEath City
IMO ..
MIA
'Hillside _
iIL
MIA
CotinsvYle
IIL
1
m8lA
BOW Grave
IL
MIA
1Daylan
,OH
.
A E
l
,MI
'
.,MI .
'..FL
ITX
.
.
3'162008
LaOOralaies Mcradled Fn8081A
'Testknerica MaIylical Testing Cap -TN
B0B1A
Nashvlle
ITMI Malylicel Services, LLC
W81A
iSpnngleld
(Trace Malytkal I.
ataies, Inc .
®81A
1
IMSkegm _
.
jTiMetdx Labaalaies
.
Inc
.
6J8IA
4Grand RapS
'US Bcsyslenxs, Inc.
,. ., ."IA
IBma Ratm
XENCO Labaa%aies, Hwslm T%
"1A
iHwstm
Page 1 of I
3116/2006
Laba'alaies ACCredW Fm 8121
'.FSVirennwlt
a
Testing & Cansulng, Inc
'.Guff Cosst Aa yhcS labpM0 ies. Inc .
'Teswnedca Malylical Testing Cop
.
-OH
8121,Memptps
8121
&la Rage
8121
_,DaMn
,TM
LA
;OH
labaMaies kcredited For 8131
8131
3'16'2008
LaSaatales
Accredted Fa8151A
AcciA.t Labaatai® of New England
Mcdest Labaalmes Of Nev Jersey
ICdL nba MalylCS Servces
'ICanpuChan a dvisim of Uhedy Analylkal Cap
e-Lah Analytical,
Inc. -T% Division
EmPnca t.ahaalan,. . LLC
'.FnvUavnerllal Science Cop .
Evir none tat Tearing B Consulting, Inc
Tipster:, Incorpaaled
I,Go ea &r nesnng Laewalaies, LLC
.
.
Guff Coast PnSyl cal
. Lacaaaies, Inc.
iHentage. EnvirorvnentA Serices LLC
Remmn Environmental Sevices
.
Latcesta
L
oralodes Inc
.
t .tCoy & McCoy lalwalaias, Inc .
IMCmbx . Labaalmes Inc
IPace
. Malytical Services -IN
IPDC L atones, Inc.
~RTI Labaalales. Inc.
Southem Petmlarm Lubaatay, Inc . TX .
;STL DMA.
STL Chicago
'STL Denver
8151A
':Madhaa4gh
8151A
Dayton
~NJ
8151A
Rochester
'NY
8151A ,Gary . .
;NC
8151A
',Howl.
8151A.
Nashville
8151A
:!" . Julie
8151A
;Memphis
TN
8151A ..
HON
Eml
.
8151A
Chalestpn
iSC
_
8151A
Dalm Rage
LA
8151A
1Indaaapdis
]IN
8151A
'Mmetla
OOH
8151A
Itarccaster..
PA
8151A
NUdsmvile
IKY
I
8151,A
.MamliiII
1
8151A
Indaa{olis
IN
8151A
Pema
A
IL
8151A .
Uvmia,
~MI
B151A
JHdslm
8151A
.
IMrttet
'NY
8151A
Untversfy Pale +IL
8151A
I/wada
~Co
Page
1 of 2
3/16/2006
STL Nalh Canton
.,STL Pensacda
',STI Fttsturgh
':STL Savannah
!STL St . Louis
'SuWOan Laba*aies Inc
.
:Teklab, Ircapaaled
Testknalca AnimlyticsT.til Corp. -OH
'TestMiedca MaI 1ical Testing Cap.
-TN
Trace
,Syllcal Laboratories. Inc
~TriMalris Labaatales
Inc . .
.
.
Laboralaies Pccredted Fa5I51A
8151A
Noth Canton
'.OH
8151A
IParsacda
FL
8151A
'Pttsburgi
PA
, .
8151A
Savannah
GA
8151A
Fath City
:::MO
I
8151A
;Hillside
6151A
jCdlnsville
6151A
jDayton
.
!OH
8151A
N.Wlii,
TN
8151A
Itobskeyon
ml
8151A
,Grant Reds
!MI
'US 6osYstems Inc
6151A
Boca Ralm
FL
%FNOO Labaatonas Houston TX
8151A.
~HOUSton
!TX
Page 2 d 2
3'16/2006
.e
e
.
! b
t Globe Gvlra ,enta, Heath and Safety Laboraoaiet
IFocaast Labaatones of New .Engand
Acculast Labaatmas
of Nav Jersey
',Pmerican Bottoms Regional Wastewater Treatment Fmility
PRDL Inc.
Claymn Grow Sevlce Inc.
IColtmda Malytical Sevices
ComWChen advision of Libery Maytica Cap .
;CT Itaatmes
~,eLab MalyticS Irc
AM
Divisor
s-1-so Maytica Irc -TX Division
Bnplical latiaatones LLC
IFnvlraxnental MoNtmng eq Techndoges, Irc
s vvonme tat
Science Cap .
l
Fmiraane,IS Testing
. 8CmsuIIing, Irc
'Fnvimmetiics
~Fiberec, Incorporated
IFirst FsvlmnmeMa lsbomlaim Irc
Gabis
.Iabote ies, .tld.
Genet Fi4nesing laboraaies, 1-LC
Grace Malytical Lab,
Inc. .
. .
Gun CostMalytcal laboratories
t
Henlage Fnviramenta Sxvices, LLC
Laporalaiea Accredted Fa820B
8260 B
North Chicago
82606
Malboragh . .
.
.
. 82608
Daytai
.
.
82808
Sauget
IL
828DB
ML Vemai
IL
82608
MI
82808
Rochester
NY
.82608
Cory
INC
82608
Bamboo
WI
82fi1B
'.Hdland
MI
.82608
Houstm
82608
Nashville
82608
Mortal Grove
IL
82608
MI Juiet
TN
8260B
Memphis
'TN
. .
82600
St. Louis
'MO
8260 B
Hot
ml
82608
Nashville
IL
82808
ICNcago
IL
. 82608
Bhkaey
IL
82608
Barn Raga
LA
82608
IIdanaais
IN
Page 1 of 3
3' 1&2806
Labaalatea
Accredted For829JB
'A ME;7NNM76k',I
Lx}
9).7M F'.ti'1A
.:7
';Kernmn Environmental Services
Lancaster Laboratoies, Inc.
Meahm Petrdewn Company II.CEnvrmmmlal faboralaies
. .,
Coy & McCoy LaWrataies, Inc
tMCi°bac
. LaWtaodies lnc'. .
!New Age / Lakmark Inc .. M
Pace Analytical Services IN
PACE Mdytical Services
.-KS
Pace Matyhcal Services
- MN
PACE Analytical Services. Inc (Indotnal d).
PDC Laboratmes, Inc. .
IPiaihe Analytical Systems, Incorporated
TI Labralmes, Inc -
.
.
.
.
SGS Environmental Services Inc
Southern Pelrde n, Laboratory Inc . MI
iSOAhern. Petrderm laboratory Ino -TX
ISTAT Malysis
Corporation
STL BAfelo
STL Chicago
STL Denver
1STL North Carom
.
.
.
'.STL Pensacola
STLPIISWrtf
_
.
8297B
Maietta
82608
Laicasler
PA
8260B
CatIoIIsWrg
KY
826DB
Madisonville
KY
82808
Menillville
82608
Bentm Harbor
8260B
Indarapotis
82DB
Lmexa
KS
82608
'.Mnroapdis
'.MN
828DB
Green Bay
.WI .
82608
..Peoia
IL
8260B
Springfield
IL
826DB
'.Uvcna
•I
MI
"
..
-
.
8260B
Anchorage . ._
82888
Traverse City
MI
82W1) Haatm T
82888
'..Chicago
82888
Amhest
82608 University IL
82808 A vada CO
82608 North Cantor OH
82978
Pmsacda
~FL
8268
PIttsWrgh
PA . .
.
Page 2 .f 3
316/2006
;STL Savannah
STL St. Louis
FL VapaSso
ISudrben .. .LaUaalones,. Ino.
.,
'Teklab, lworpgaled
TestAne ica Mdyticd Testing Cap . -IA
'TesWnara Malylcd Testing Cap -IL
ITesWnedca Matylcd Testing Cap -OH
~TesWnedca Mdylical Testing Cap . - TN
Test%nenca Malyticd Testing Cap. -VVI
I
TMLMdylical. Semcess, LLC
Trace Mdytkd Labaalaies, Inc .
riMalu L c. toirs, Inc .
'+USFllte a*oscan Services
White
wow
Associates . Inc .
iXENCO Laboratoies Houston TX
Labdalaies Accredted For 82608
Savas,S
GA
82638
Ealh City
MO
. .82608
:Valpa3so
8260B
:Hitside
82618
!Cdlinsviee
820B
Ceda Falls
IA
8260B
BMao Grove
IL
8260B
Dayton
OH
.
8260B
Nashville
ITIN
.
.
.
82608
:Walsdov.n
!WI
82608
Spdn TSd
82808
'.IMakegal
82608
':. Grand Raids
MI
82608
Boca Raton
FL
82608
'Rdhschild
w
82608
IMlsa
MI
82638
':. Houston
TX
Page
3 of 3
N16'2008
Pccutest labaacnes of,New England
.
.
.
!MCUtmt laboratories
N
New
. Jersey
yenWce Bodona Regonal Wasteva& Treatment Factty, _
'MDL Inc .
Clayton Gnwp Services, Inc.
,Cdumba. Maytca Services
;COmpuChw a division
d Liberty
Mayiica Cap.
''CT labaataies
!eLab Maytica Inc -MI Nvision
eLab Maytical Inc. -TX Division
;Empncal. Labaaones LLC
Envvaenenta Montaing ar4 Techndogum, Inc,
. .
irnVUOnmanta Science Cap
.
.
.
Envimmnenta Testing 8Caisdbng, Inc
.
...
iEnvir manes
~;Fat Environments Labaaloies, Inc .
iGenera
Engineering
Labaelanes, LLC
Grace Maytca Lab Inc
._
Gull Coast MatyticS Labordcnes Inc
Leborataie Accrerfted For8270C
82700
82700
82700
$
IL
.
. .
827DC
A. Venon
IL
82700
'NW
'MI
827DC
Rccheste
NY
82700
.
Cary
INC
827DC
:Baaboo
'wl
B270C
Holland
LMI
8270C
talon
TX
8270C
Nashville
TN
. .
.
82700
Morton Grove
IL
82700
MI . Juliet
TN
.
82700
phi
TN
827DC
St. La
'MO
:
827OC
''.Hdt
!Ml
827CC
Napevlle
IL
8270C
CNCago
_ .,
'IL
82700
:Chadeaton
SC
82700
'.Bakdey
IL
82700
Baton Rouge
IA
827DC
'.Indanapdis
IIN
B270C
Maleba
OH
E
w
t e&d
VO'
4e~~re^e5'
mm
_
.
.
vd
W/rgsna''
.
OOLZe
ld
.
..
i
epzesued
:
.
.
0028
.
.
.
.
.
_
.-
.
.
HO
WIW04WN
.
00[38
00
ePeMl
..
00125
ii'
. Wed
Aiw-u(j'
.
.
0028
-
.
AN
Isagi
00[38
Xl
.
WISroH',
00L39
I!0
eve~l
.
00[38
86
.
.woV
DOLN
e!-0
00[38
ppbuudS
0029
.
.
.
e-00d
:
0OL39
A2g uea0
0009
.
.
.
AyeQWq
.
.
0028
NN
s!pdeauun
mu
.
.
.
.
NI
..
slWeuepul'
.
OWN
NI
elmll
N
0009
Am,
.
.--eIIPWspen _
.
00[N
AN
.
Sjr slielp0
00[29
Vd
~elseOVel
.,
00[39
ueluen2S 11S
1
yfvrpsua
,ls
.
epwsWd liS
-1-0 VWN ,1ST
LAWO
11Si
o6eoN0 115,
O J
1IS
.
W!1¢udw0
SiSA!eW
lvis
X1-OOI 'Aiolengel wnelwpd
~OS
.;
II
ou Apleupe7
..w
.piled
wOUlrvs5
OOI
seiµsS lelwwuw!nvj SOSi
=Ui
'ssWp'wellla
i
'
POIttd1O0u1'swOISAS pO!IAIeW aupy,
.
oul s$LOW
1 00dl
('IS
eualp9) o+l
'SOO!NSS
RO!IApW OOed%
IM-
seO!ASS
reO!IARW 3OVd
NW-
WO!
.ueS
p
.,IApW
esed
SCI- segnsS po!IApW 3OVd'
NI
-
SGOWGS
p IIAI
LV
eaed',
Oul
seWploge7 xpaOyy
:
'UI 'SOI!OIEfl
1 AOD VI8 AOOiY'
RIWwuw!nu30,1 Auedun0 wnerypd WVprery,
-
OUl
'so! Ie
e1 ielseouel
i
00LZS
-
d Pelpen,V -W1elO9
-
I
900Z9LIE
31612006
!$TL St. Lais
STL Valpaaiso
lsuw~
LabarMOn~ Inc..
~Teklab, Incaponaled
~TesIMiaica Analytical Testing Cap IA
ITestnaica Analytical Telling Cap -IL
TaaV sadca Analytical Testing Cap
.
-OH
TesWnerica Analytical Testing Cap -TN
. ..
.
fTMIMaSnicS Same LLC
ITrace Mall Labaalaies, Inc
I
TnWn labaaaies Inc
US 9osyslems, Inc .
USFlItaF»vimscanSemces
.
..~- ..
8T70c
'.Rdbscwt
'WI
,XBNCO Lebaatmts Houston TX
82700
',Houston
'. TX
Laboratmee Pccredted Far827DC
82700
paaso
82700
Hillside
827Cc
Cdlinsville
82700
Cedar Falls
827CC
'.Mo . Grwe
82700
Oaylcn
827CC
NeMille
82700
SpinIeid
IL
82700
M skegon
ml
8270C
Grad Rapids
MI
827DC
'..Boca Raton
FL
Page 3 d 3
311& 2
4AED . T AViPblii
Accuht to
ARDL, Inc.
CanIauChem a division
d Liberty
Analytical
. Cap.
CT taborataies
'slab Maytica Inc. -T% Dvs+on
Empirical LSaatones. IC
. .
.
Enviromnental Monitoring and Techndoges, Inc.
' .Ernrarnenta Science Cap . .
;Environmental Testing BCcsdtirg. Inc
Genera Engneenng laWc
dies
LLC
Gulf Coast Malytica laboraorias Inc
Kemron FnvuanmeMa Services
Lancaster Lawrdtaies, Inc
.
;PDC Leboratanes Inc
..
.
STL CNcago
STL Denver__
STL St . Louis
TesLAmedca Maytica Testing Cap.
.-7N
.
.
.
TnMatru labaatonea Inc .
as of New &gland
Laboraohei Accredited For 8330
NA. Vernon
8330
Cary
.
8330
Bamboo
8330
,Houston.
!T%
8330
'Nshvile
STN
8330
Mon. Grove
:IL
JUNG
TN
,
s
ITN
9330
8330
8330 . .
0
hateston
';SC
Burton Rouge
[A
IMaietta
OH
I
5330 '.Lancaster
iPA
5330
Panda
IL
'University Park
IL
8330
/wads
i
co
8330
',Faith City_
MO
8330
Nashville
8330
Grand Rapids
Page I
d 1
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached FINAL
COMMENTS of the Illinois EPA upon the persons to whom they are directed, by
placing a copy of each in an envelope addressed to
:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Matt Dunn
Environmental Bureau Chief
Office of the Attorney General
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, 12 th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Service List)
sufficient postage affixed as indicated above
.
Bill Richardson, General Counsel
Illinois Dept. of Natural Resources
One Natural Resources Way
Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271
Richard McGill, Jr .
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph St
.
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
and mailing them (First Class Mail) from Springfield, Illinois on April 13, 2006, with
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
This
13th
day of
April, 2006
.
BRENDA O HNER
`'
NOTARY
rueW
-STATE OF IWNOIS
:
Notary Public
'-
o
:,
;,,
s n
3
Zoos
THIS FILING SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
http://www.ipcb.state .il.us/cool/external/casenotifyNew.asp?caseid=12751¬ifytype=Service
4/11/2006
Printing Service List
.
.
.
.
Page 1 of 2
Party Name
IEPA
Role
1021 North Grand Avenue East
City & State
Springfield
Phone/Fax
217/782-5544
Petitioner
P.O. Box 19276
IL 62794-9276 217/782-9807
Kimberly A. Geving, Assistant Counsel
Annet Godiksen, Legal Counsel
H_odge Dwye_rZeman
3150 Roland Avenue
Springfield
217/523-4900
Interested Party
Post Office Box 5776
IL 62705-5776 217/523-4948
Christine G. Zeman
Karen L. Bernoteit
Katherine D. Hodge
Thomas G. Safley
Sidley Austin LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago
312/853-7000
Interested Party
Suite 2800
IL 60603
312/853-7036
William G . Dickett
EPI
Interested Party
16650 South Canal
South Holland
IL 60473
Bob Mankowski
Illinois Environmental Regulator Group
Springfield
217/523-4942
Interested Party
3150 Roland Avenue
IL 62703
217/523-4948
Katherine D . Hodge, Executive Director
Thomas G. Safley
Chemical Industry Council of Illinois
Interested Party
2250 E. Devon Avenue
Suite 239
DesPlaines
IL 60018-4509
Lisa Frede
Bell_ande_& Sargi ss Law Croup, LLP_
19 South LaSalle Street
Chicago
312/853-8188
Interested Party
Suite 1203
IL 60603
312/782-0040
Mark Robert Sargis
H-a_nson Engineers, Inc
Springfield
217/788-2450
Interested Party
1525 South Sixth Street
IL 62703-2886 217/788-2503
Tracy Lundein
Conestoga Rovers & Associates
8615 West Bryn Mawr Avenue
Chicago
773/380-9933
Interested Party
IL 60631
773/380-6421
Douglas G . Soutter
Office of the Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
Chicago
312/814-2550
Interested Party
188 West Randolph, 20th Floor IL 60601
312/814-2347
Matthew J. Dunn, Division Chief
Naval Trainin Center
847/688-4422
Great Lakes
Interested Party
2601A Paul Jones Street
IL 60088-2845 847/688-6917
Georgia Vlahos
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph St .
Chicago
312/814-3620
Interested Party
Suite 11-500
IL 60601
312/814-3669
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Board
Richard McGill, Hearing Officer
Commonwealth Edison
10 South Dearborn Street
Chicago
Interested Party
35FNW
IL 60603
Diane H. Richardson
Clayton Group_ Services
Interested Party
3140 Finley Road
Downers Grove
IL 60515
Monte Nienkerk
Weaver Boos & Gordon
Interested Party
2021 Timberbrook Lane
Springfield
IL 62702
rage2of2
Total number of participants : 37
http://www.ipcb.state .il.us/cool/external/casenotifyNew.asp?caseid=12751¬ifytype=Service
4/11/2006
Elizabeth Steinhour
Andrews Environmental Engineering
3535 Mayflower Boulevard
Interested Party
Mark Marszalek
Graef A_nhalt Schloe_mer & Associates, Inc. 8501 West Higgins Road
Springfield
IL 62711
Chicago
IL 60631-2801
Interested Party
Suite 280
Dr. Douglas C. Hambley, P.E., P.G
.
Midwest Engineering Services
4243 West 166th Street
Interested Party
Oak Forest
IL 60452
Erin Curley, Environmental Dept. Manager
Rockford
IL 61110-0827
Missman Stanley & Associates
333 East State Street
Interested Party
John W. Hochwarter
Jeffrey Larson
Trivvedi Associates,Inc
.
Naperville
IL 60565
2055 Steeplebrook Court
Interested Party
Chetan Trivedi
Illinois Department of Natural Resources
Springfield
217/782-1809
One Natural Resources Way
Interested Party
IL 62702-1271 217/524-9640
Stan Yonkauski
William Richardson, Chief Legal Counsel
SuburbanLa oratories, Inc
Hillside
IL 60162
708-544-3260
4140 Litt Drive
Interested Party
Jarrett Thomas, V.P .
Illinois DeD-artment_of_Transpo_rtation
2300 S. Dirksen Parkway
Springfield
IL 62764
Interested Party
Room 330
Steven Gobelman
Thomas Benson
McGuire Woods LLP
77 W. Wacker
Interested Party
Suite 4100
Chicago
IL 60601
312/849-8100
David Rieser
Reott Law Offices, LLC
35 East Wacker Drive
Chicago
312/332-7544
Interested Party
Suite 650
IL 60601
Raymond T. Reott
Jorge T. Mihalopoulos
Chicago Department-of Law
30 N. LaSalle Street
Chicago
IL 60602
Interested Party
Suite 900
Charles A . King, Assistant Corporation Counsel
SRAC
Decatur
IL 62521
Interested Party
2510 Brooks Drive
Harry Walton
