ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 16, 2006
     
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
     
    Complainant,
     
    v.
     
    VILLAGE OF HAINESVILLE, an Illinois
    municipal corporation,
     
    Respondent.
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
     
     
     
     
    PCB 06-134
    (Enforcement - Public Water Supply)
     
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
     
    On January 20, 2006, the Office of the Attorney General, on behalf of the People of the
    State of Illinois (People), filed a two-count complaint against the Village of Hainesville.
    See
    415
    ILCS 5/31(c)(1) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.204. Accompanying the complaint was a
    stipulation and proposal for settlement. The complaint concerns the Village of Hainesville’s
    public water supply facility at Hainesville, Lake County. For the reasons below, the Board
    accepts the parties’ stipulation and proposed settlement.
     
    Under the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/1
    et seq
    . (2004)), the
    Attorney General and the State’s Attorneys may bring actions before the Board on behalf of the
    People to enforce Illinois’ environmental requirements.
    See
    415 ILCS 5/31 (2004); 35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 103. In this case, the People allege that the Village of Hainesville violated Sections 15(a)
    and 18(a) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/15(a) and 18(a) (2004)) and 35 Ill. Adm. Code 602.101(a) and
    652.101(a). The People further allege that the Village of Hainesville violated these provisions by
    (1) constructing and completing a well and constructing a fluoride feed system without
    submitting plans and specifications to the Agency and first obtaining a construction permit; and
    (2) failing to provide a distance of between 12 and 24 inches between the overflow pipe of its
    finished water tank and the ground, thereby threatening a cross-connection.
     
    The January 20, 2006 stipulation and proposed settlement was accompanied by a request
    for relief from the hearing requirement of Section 31(c)(1) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/31(c)(1)
    (2004)). This filing is authorized by Section 31(c)(2) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2004)),
    which requires that the public have an opportunity to request a hearing whenever the State and a
    respondent propose settling an enforcement action without a public hearing.
    See
    35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 103.300(a). The Board provided notice of the stipulation, proposed settlement, and request
    for relief from hearing. The Board published newspaper notice in the
    Grayslake Times
    on
    February 10, 2006. The Board did not receive any requests for hearing. The Board grants the
    parties’ request for relief from the hearing requirement.
    See
    415 ILCS 5/31(c)(2) (2004); 35 Ill.
    Adm. Code 103.300(b).
    Section 103.302 of the Board’s procedural rules sets forth the required contents of
    stipulations and proposed settlements. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 103.302. These requirements include

     
    2
    stipulating to facts on the nature, extent, and causes of the alleged violations and the nature of the
    Village of Hainesville’s operations. Section 103.302 also requires that the parties stipulate to
    facts called for by Section 33(c) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/33(c) (2004)), which bears on the
    reasonableness of the circumstances surrounding the alleged violations.
     
    The Village of Hainesville neither admits nor denies the alleged violations. The
    stipulation also addresses the factors of Section 42(h) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/42(h) (2004)),
    which may mitigate or aggravate the civil penalty amount. The Village of Hainesville agrees to
    pay a civil penalty of $3,000, which the People assert will serve to deter further violations and
    aid in future voluntary compliance.
     
    The People and the Village of Hainesville have satisfied Section 103.302. The Board
    accepts the stipulation and proposed settlement. This docket is now closed.
     
    This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
     
    ORDER
     
    1. The Board accepts and incorporates by reference the stipulation and proposed
    settlement.
     
    2. The Village of Hainesville, through its attorney of record, must pay a civil penalty
    of $3,000 no later than April 17, 2006, which is the first business day after the
    30th day after the date of this order. The Village of Hainesville must pay the civil
    penalty by certified check, money order, or electronic funds transfer, payable to
    the Environmental Protection Trust Fund. The case number, case name, and the
    Village of Hainesville’s social security number or federal employer identification
    number must be included on the certified check or money order.
     
    3. The Village of Hainesville, through its attorney of record, must send the certified
    check, money order, or electronic funds transfer to the following person at the
    indicated address:
     
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services Division
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    P.O. Box 19276
    Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
     
    4. The Village of Hainesville, through its attorney of record, must send a copy of the
    certified check, money order, or record of electronic funds transfer and any
    transmittal letter to the following person at the indicated address:
     

     
    3
     
    Stephen J. Sylvester, Assistant Attorney General
    Environmental Bureau
    188 West Randolph Street, 20th Floor
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
     
    5. Penalties unpaid within the time prescribed will accrue interest under Section
    42(g) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/42(g) (2004)) at the rate
    set forth in Section 1003(a) of the Illinois Income Tax Act (35 ILCS 5/1003(a)
    (2004)).
     
    6. The Village of Hainesville must cease and desist from the alleged violations.
     
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
     
    Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may
    be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the
    order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2004);
    see also
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906, 102.706.
    Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the Illinois
    Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. The
    Board’s procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its final
    orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    101.520;
    see also
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
     
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
    adopted the above opinion and order on March 16, 2006, by a vote of 4-0.
     
     
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top