ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February 2, 2006
     
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
     
    Complainant,
     
    v.
     
    LOGSDON SAND AND GRAVEL, and M.K.
    O’HARA CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
     
    Respondents.
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
    )
     
     
     
     
     
    AC 05-54
    (IEPA No. 33-05-AC)
    (Administrative Citation)
     
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD (by A.S. Moore):
     
    On January 31, 2006, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) filed a
    motion to dismiss respondent Logsdon Sand and Gravel (LSG) and for a final order. Below, the
    Board first reviews the procedural history of this proceeding before granting the Agency’s
    motions, issuing its final order, assessing the statutory penalty, and closing the docket.
     
    PROCEDURAL HISTORY
     
    Citation
     
    On February 10, 2005, the Agency timely filed an administrative citation against three
    respondents: the Ray Logsdon Estate (Logsdon Estate); LSG; and M.K. O’Hara Construction,
    Inc. (O’Hara).
    See
    415 ILCS 5/31.1(c) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.202(c). The Agency
    alleged that on December 15, 2004, the three respondents violated Sections 21(p)(1), (p)(4), and
    (p)(7) of the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1), (p)(4), (p)(7) (2004)).
    The Agency further alleges that the three respondents violated these provisions by causing or
    allowing the open dumping of waste in a manner that resulted in (1) litter; (2) deposition of
    waste in standing or flowing waters; and (3) deposition of general construction or demolition
    debris or clean construction or demolition debris at 300 West Main Street, Beardstown, Cass
    County.
     
    The Agency provided proof of service of the citation upon respondents Logsdon Estate
    and LSG on February 9, 2005, and upon respondent O’Hara on February 10, 2005. Petitions for
    review of the citation were due on March 16, 2005 and March 17, 2005, respectively.
    See
    425
    ILCS 31.1(d)(1) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.204(b).
     
    Respondent Logsdon Estate
     
    On March 23, 2005, the Agency filed a motion to dismiss respondent Logsdon Estate
    (Mot. Dism. 1). The Agency stated that it had originally considered the Logsdon Estate to be

     
    2
    involved with the site that is the subject of this citation. Mot Dism. 1 at 1. The Agency further
    stated that it had since “learned that the Ray Logsdon Estate was closed on December 29, 1978,
    and that all estate property and assets have been transferred” to LSG.
    Id
    .
     
    Neither of the two other respondents responded to the Agency’s motion, and they
    therefore waived any objection to the granting of the motion.
    See
    35. Ill. Adm. Code 101.500(d).
    In an order dated April 21, 2005, the Board granted the Agency’s motion to dismiss the Logsdon
    Estate. The Board further directed that, with the dismissal of the Logsdon Estate, the caption in
    future filings should reflect that only two respondents remained: LSG and O’Hara.
     
    Respondent O’Hara
     
    On February 28, 2005, the Board received a letter from Madalyn O’Hara, O’Hara’s
    president. In a March 3, 2005 order, the Board accepted the letter as a timely-filed petition for
    review but also stated that, under Illinois law, any party other than an individual must be
    represented by an attorney licensed and registered to practice law.
    See
    35 Ill. Adm. Code
    101.400(a), citing 705 ILCS 205/1 (2004) (Attorney Act) and 705 ILCS 220/1 (2004)
    (Corporation Practice of Law Prohibition Act). In the same order, the Board gave O’Hara 30
    days to have an attorney file an amended petition for the company and stated that the original
    petition would be dismissed if O’Hara did not do so within that 30-day period.
     
    On March 11, 2005, the Agency filed a motion seeking to have the Board reconsider its
    order accepting Ms. O’Hara’s letter as a timely petition. Ultimately, O’Hara failed to file any
    amended petition as required by the Board’s March 3, 2005 order. Consequently, the Board in
    an April 21, 2005 order dismissed Ms. O’Hara’s original petition and denied the Agency’s
    motion to reconsider as moot. In the same order, the Board found that O’Hara had defaulted.
    See
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.404, 108.406. Although the Board thus found that O’Hara had
    committed the violations alleged in the citation, it withheld issuing a final order until the Board
    made a final decision concerning LSG.
    See, e.g.,
    IEPA v. Ray, AC 04-57 (June 17, 2004).
     
    Respondent LSG
     
    In an April 21, 2005 order, the Board accepted for hearing a timely petition for review
    filed by LSG. On January 31, 2006, however, the Agency filed a motion to dismiss (Mot. Dism.
    2) the pending action against LSG. The Agency states that, “based on newly-discovered
    circumstances surrounding this case, Illinois EPA believes that it is now appropriate to dismiss
    this Administrative Citation” against LSG. Mot. Dism. 2 at 2. The Agency further states that, if
    the Board grants the motion to dismiss LSG, O’Hara would be the only remaining respondent
    and that the case would be ripe for a final order.
    Id
    .
     
    CONCLUSION
     
    The Board grants the Agency’s motion to dismiss respondent LSG. Having already
    determined that O’Hara, the only remaining respondent, has committed the violations alleged in
    the citation, the Board proceeds to issue a final order below.
     

     
    3
    The civil penalty for violating any provision of Section 21(p) is $1,500 for each violation
    of each such provision for a first offense and $3,000 for each violation of each such provision for
    a second or subsequent offense. 415 ILCS 5/42(b)(4-5) (2004); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500(a).
    Because there are three violations of Section 21(p) and these violations are first offenses, the
    total civil penalty is $4,500. Under Section 31.1(d)(1) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/31.1(d)(1)
    (2004)), the Board attaches the administrative citation and makes it part of the order below.
     
    This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
     
    ORDER
     
    1. The Board finds that M.K. O’Hara Construction, Inc. has violated Sections
    21(p)(1, (p)(4), and (p)(7) of the Act as alleged. M.K. O’Hara
    Construction, Inc. must pay a civil penalty of $4,500 no later than
    Monday, March 6, 2006, which is the first business day after the 30th day
    after the date of this order.
     
    2. M. K. O’Hara Construction, Inc. must pay the civil penalty by certified
    check or money order, made payable to the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Trust Fund. The case number, case name, and M.K. O’Hara
    Construction, Inc.’s social security number or federal employer
    identification number must be included on the certified check or money
    order.
     
    3. M.K. O’Hara Construction, Inc. must send the certified check or money
    order and the remittance form to:
     
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services Division
    1021 North Grand Avenue East
    P.O. Box 19276
    Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
     
    4. Penalties unpaid within the time prescribed will accrue interest under
    Section 42(g) of the Environmental Protection Act (415 ILCS 5/42(g)
    (2004)) at the rate set forth in Section 1003(a) of the Illinois Income Tax
    Act (35 ILCS 5/1003(a) (2004)).
     
    5. Payment of this penalty does not prevent future prosecution if the
    violation continues.
     
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
     
    Section 41(a) of the Environmental Protection Act provides that final Board orders may
    be appealed directly to the Illinois Appellate Court within 35 days after the Board serves the
    order. 415 ILCS 5/41(a) (2004);
    see also
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.300(d)(2), 101.906, 102.706.

     
    4
    Illinois Supreme Court Rule 335 establishes filing requirements that apply when the Illinois
    Appellate Court, by statute, directly reviews administrative orders. 172 Ill. 2d R. 335. The
    Board’s procedural rules provide that motions for the Board to reconsider or modify its final
    orders may be filed with the Board within 35 days after the order is received. 35 Ill. Adm. Code
    101.520;
    see also
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.902, 102.700, 102.702.
     
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
    adopted the above order on February 2, 2006, by a vote of 4-0.
     
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top