ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 19, 2006
IN THE MATTER OF:
ORGANIC MATERIAL EMISSION
STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS FOR
THE CHICAGO AND METRO-EAST
AREAS: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
35 ILL. CODE 218 AND 219
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
R06-21
(Rulemaking – Air)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by T.E. Johnson):
On December 22, 2005, the Board received a rulemaking proposal submitted by the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) pursuant to Sections 27 and 28 of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act (Act). 415 ILCS 5/27, 28 (2004). The Agency proposes
amendments to Parts 218 and 219 of the volatile organic material (VOM) rules to allow for the
use of add-on controls as a compliance option for printing operations using cold cleaning solvent
degreasing. Pet. at 3.
BACKGROUND
Solvent cleaning, or degreasing as it is commonly called, is a process using aqueous
liquids or non-aqueous organic solvents to clean and remove soils from surfaces. Pet. at 2.
Solvent cleaning is divided into three major types: cold cleaning, open-top vapor degreasing,
and conveyorized degreasing.
Id
. Evaporation of the solvent used during degreasing results in
VOM emissions that react with other pollutants such as nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide to
form ozone.
Id
.
Diversapack, a printing company that recycles
washer and uses add-on controls for the abatement of process emissions, contacted the Agency in
May 2003 regarding a possible variance from the vapor pressure limits at 35 Ill. Adm. Code
218.182(c). Pet. at 2. Diversapack uses solvents compatible with their printing operations that
do not meet the current vapor pressure requirements.
Id
. The Agency identified three additional
point sources in the Chicago area that use add-on controls plus solvents that do not meet the
lower vapor pressure limits.
Id.
In lieu of the site-specific rulemakings for each of the identified facilities, the Agency is
proposing revisions to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218 and 219. Pet. at 2. Specifically, the Agency
proposes revising Sections 218.182 and 219.182 to allow for add-on controls or equivalent
alternative control plans as compliance options
solvent sale, solvent use, add-on control testing, and record keeping requirements. Pet. at 3.
In 1997, the Agency submitted control measures that reduced VOM emissions for cold
cleaning degreaser operations in the Chicago and Metro-East nonattianment areas. Pet. at 3.
These revisions lowered the allowed solvent vapor pressure for operations in Chicago and the
2
Metro-East areas.
Id
. Under the Clean Air Act and the USEPA Sate Implementation Plan (SIP),
failure to obtain equivalent emissions reductions from the cold cleaning sources would require
the Agency to make up the deficiency through the implementation of contingency control
measures. Pet. at 3-4. The Agency asserts that the USEPA indicates that the 95% control level
proposed here is sufficient for this emissions source category. Pet. at 4.
Currently an 8-hour national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) standard is in effect
for the Chicago and the Metro-East areas designating both as a moderate ozone nonattainment
area. Pet. at 3. This 8-hour NAAZS replaced the previous 1-hour standard on June 15, 2005.
Given that the USEPA has a policy against regression, the control measures adopted to meet the
1-hour standard must still be maintained.
Id.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
The Agency is proposing to revise its cold cleaning degreaser rules in the Chicago and
Metro-East nonattainment areas by making parallel changes to 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.182(c) and
(d) and 219.182(c) and (d). Pet. at 5. The Agency is proposing revisions to allow for the sale or
purchase of solvents with vapor pressure greater than 1.0mmHg in units greater than five gallons
to or by sources that have valid permits, are in compliance with the add-on control requirements,
or are exempt.
Id.
The Agency is also proposing control requirements to allow for the option of
add-on controls.
Id.
Subsections are being created that will require sources using solvents with
vapor pressures greater than 1.0mmHg to control their emissions to an overall capture and
control efficiency of no less than 95%. Pet. at 6.
The Agency proposes provisions that allow for equivalent alternative emissions plans
stipulating that emissions from a solvent with a vapor pressure of 1.0 mmHg shall be the basis
for assessment of equivalent emissions for any proposed control plan and that the equivalent
alternative control plans must have at least 95% reduction in VOM emissions. Pet. at 7.
Provisions have also been added mandating the testing of add-on controls.
Id
. Currently
operating add-on controls must be tested by March 1, 2006, and newly constructed add-on
controls shall be tested within 90 days after startup.
Id
. The testing procedures, monitoring, and
recordkeeping provisions for add-on controls and equivalent alternative control plans will be
consistent with the provisions in Section 218.105 and Section 219.105, which require that the
control devices be operated and maintained at the manufacturer’s specifications and continuously
monitored to assure that they are operating at the required compliance levels. All records must
be kept for a minimum of three years.
Id
.
The Agency’s proposal, including its statement of reasons and the full text of the
proposed rule language, is available through the Clerk’ Office in Chicago (312-814-3620) and on
the Board’s Web site (www.ipcb.state.il.us) using the Clerk’s Office On-Line or “COOL.”
DISCUSSION
The Board accepts the Agency’s proposal for hearing. However, a review of the proposal
reveals that the Agency did not address the applicability of or provide the information requested
in the “published study or report” requirement of Section 102.210(c). 35 Ill. Adm. Code
3
102.210(c). S
ee also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 102.202(k). The Board requests that the Agency address
Section 102.210(c), or its inapplicability, in writing prior to any hearing scheduled in this
proceeding at such time as directed by the hearing officer. The assigned hearing officer is
directed to proceed expeditiously under the rulemaking provisions of the Act (415 ILCS 5/27, 28
(2004)) and the Board’s procedural rules. 35 Ill. Adm. Code 102.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
adopted the above order on January 19, 2006, by a vote of 4-0.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
