Mike McCambridge

Erin :

Mike, I jus got these rom D borah I h ve already let h k

w th t w adopted he ul s so ma P ge 1

From :

ORIGINAL

Erin CONLEY

To :

McCambridge, Mike

Date:

1/11/2006 8 :46:03 AM

Subject :

Mike, I just got these from Deborah, I have already let her know that we adopted the

rules, so maybe

Mike, I just got these from Deborah, I have already let her know that we adopted the rules, so maybe any

of the suggested changes should be filed in a "deal with later" spot .

Let me know what you think about these, it doesn't look like anything too drastic

.

RECEIVEDCLERK'S

OFFICE

I need responses, please, on these questions and suggestions

. The line numbers refer to the 01 we sent

Ms Gunn .

703:

I. 702 - Change "703 .222 et seq ." to actual section references .

I. 1393, 1401, 1689, 1696 - Specify what is "appropriate"

. I know this is taken verbatim from the federal

rule but Mr . McCambridge, in notice pages, often lists numerous "deviations from federal rules".

App .A, G .1 . needs text per SOS rules.

720

I. 1204, 1208 - Why "Method"? It's inconsistent with the other ASTM references .

I. 1279, 1283 - Why "EPA 600/4-79-020" in one and "EPA 600/4-79-002" in the other?

I . 1449, 1454, 1458 -Why "final" in 2 and "FINAL" in one?

I . 1859-"40 CFR 265, Appendices I and III through V (2004)" is on file with SOS but missing from your

version . It exists on your web site and I will fax you the SOS version if needed

. Restore or strike .

I. 1897 - your version references "733

.155" twice . We think you mean "733 .152" . Please advise .

I

. 1905-1909 & 1911-1913 - Why do these different CFRs have the same title?

721 :

R06-G

aCRA- SJBnz~

P-06-

7 1ZC'SJoTtT1-t=

G

?c z

JAN 1 1 2006

STATE OF ILLINOIS

Pollution Control Board

---

ge - ike just got these from Deborah,

I have already let her

know that we adopted the

rules, so ma. . . Page 2

Numerous times throughout most of these Parts you have changed

(e.g., I. 371) "40 CFR 268" to "federal

40 CFR 268"

. Why? Is there some CFR that is not "federal"? And why add "federal" some places and not

in others?

I. 1782 -

why strike "2002"?

I

. 2341 & 2463 - Why "on site" and "on-site"?

1

. 3116, 3119, 3123, 3127, 3131 -Why "Standard"?

722 :

I. 137 -Why "(2004)"?

I

. 1232, 1258, 1327 -

Should be "appendix"? if not, why lowercase "section" and "annex"?

I . 1287 - Should be "table" . Ditto .

723 :

I

. 96, 100 -Why strike "shall"?

724 :

1

. 2199-Should "724 .251" be "724

.151"?

I. 7938 -

Should "8700-22a" be "8700-22A" as in I

. 7940? See also I . 8111 .

App

. I the table under (f) - "ethylf'?

726 :

I . 582-583, 2124-2125

-

Why "federal appendix" here but not in I

. 2117 (and elsewhere throughout the

Parts)?

I

. 2246 - "appropriate" see note in Part 703 .

I. 2550-Should this be "730 .11(b)"?

I. 2871 - App

. H is titled "Hazardous Constituents"

I . 3175, 3182, 3185, 3194

- The agency refers to itself (as does everyone else) as "IEMA"

.

---

Mike McCambridge -

Mike, I

•ust got these

from Deb ah I have already let her know that we adopted the ules

om P ge3

I. 3444

-

Change "against" to "Against"

.

728 :

I. 2644

- why capitalize "Methoxychlor" and "Toxaphene"? you've taken the others (I . 2628, 2636 to

lowercase) .

738 :

I. 1322, 1333

- the 2nd "following" is not necessary because of the 1st "following .

dc