1. tbnn I)efendant’s business.
      2. tiling their Compludnt.
      3. Complaint.
      4. N()1.Abk’J AW OH’R’t.

HFN’~Ii IU,
II I
I\OF~ FCC
lIHY t O,\HKC lit) kId)
RORFI1’F F, N\SSFL\, IC,,
anti
ft
(
‘itt~thWtitnt’..
F\ F 1,1 )CCS’l’I( ‘S
\OR tM “‘IFRIC \. 15k
~U 5~
)
KknE.u’rnctit
.~‘uisc)
i’t~t,pn
n J en t
\(11
kU Of f’lI.l
\C
NI
(vI~~
ilK I;irC
‘~I
rt.I
FtC 5 c~~i
Ra~idoIpIi
i:
~~lIiC:
1—
Kh~u. 1
HrKIlc~F. I.iIFt
F~’Li.L
H
C)
IIuift~ (~H
CI? W~HR:tttdnlplt
~c
II
(‘IlicHA’. U. CIIKIT
~l?YL)~HI’.
/ j Ni
A
N’:
151?
R&’lan~I
A’
c
I’ 13,
It
Ft
FASF
i’AkF NIH
the. (.)Ii1c.:c
~
Clech
I
.ea\’e to ?\nuud (
iptaint
UpK1I)
\
(~II
‘l’mnicihc Ni Nolan, ~tr~ A ~uIlivan
Nt~LAN1
AW
OFtft’I
.:\itttrncys
i/u E)etendanus
13
\“e~ iach~~nBlvd .,Su~rcIll?
(ca/a, IL UU6U4~37O2
1I2)322C 100; Fax(312~322-I too
I ‘F,
Cat cm
I)cccnihcr N
Nods, NOi.:\N i,A\N~’(IFFICT, ‘~i:ICD
the’ F. IIItI,)IC i’t,lJaticn
F
l3)tnit’iI die- ~iiiachcii lolion
br
Insl~tittt~’,
cctpieii ci’
vv:lncIi
are
~
iicrct,t anti ‘,IercI’,\ ee’\c,i
ric\
let’
tid’pI~tnittir
PROOF
OF
SERVICE
The undersigned attorney Cerl ifles that this notice ~sservcd b~ nat! ing a c’
In
each
person to whom it is deeded, by placing a copy
of
said documcn,t in
an
envelope propel 1)’
addressed to each person above with postage prepaid and deposiUng/lame in the 1, .S Mail at 5)
\V, Jackson 3!v~L. Chicago, iflinok on December 5,2005.
/
f
/
/
,&“~:r
t~k.
~
THIS DOCUMENT PRINTED ON RECYCLED
PAPER

liFFOl4~fin: ti.i J\l )IS
l’Ol U TRES 4 4)”.’EIU)t. hi )..140
ROI.WR’l’
F. KASSEI .4,
J It. and
KFI.LIL- 14. KASSELA,
I’4.nlptainantc.
S.
i’t:a No.
lIti.ItlIl
~ftf lAfl;ISTI(S
)
lEnibrerment
oi~ic-p
‘S014I’ll
A\lFltl(’:t,
INC..
-
Respondent.
\lg)Tl()N
FOR LEAVE TO
AMEN!)
(‘OMPI,AINT, ISS’I’A~sILk
s~)W ut )Ml : the (‘oinplainanis. ROUltiti I. K.-\SS.I -A JR. and 1(1
I .1 IL K.
k.\SSFLA..
h’
and thnntgh
their attorneys, NOLAN LAW (flFft. F anJ j-’ui suant
to
3~
III Adni. (‘ode Section
101.502.
move the
I tearing Officer to enter
an I
)rder
granting
‘4’mplatnants leave
Ii~
amend their t ‘omplaint
instanter
or in
the
alwrnati~
e
to schedute a
dale certain L’r hcuriiw on this Motion. In support hereof, Complainants state as tollows:
On July
5. 200S Complainants tiled
their Complaint
ss ith the Illinois
Pollution
Control
Hoard alleging violations of 35 lILAdm. (‘ode 901.1(12,
901.103.
901.104
and
90).
t
(*.
seeking
relief
against
Defendant for noise pollution emanating
and resulting
tbnn I)efendant’s
business.
Complainants sought,
received
and relied upon guidance of IPCB in
drafting and
tiling
their Compludnt.
complainants
were
not represented by counsel at the time of the tiling of
the
Complaint.
On
October
19,
2005,
the NOLAN LAW OFFICE filed their Appearance on
hehalt’o I
Complainants.
This document printed on recycled
paper
1

.1’;~l1lnn: . .
Iv.
nr.).C/tt ;j~,,, ;~,;.fli;u’.,
~ ..
, ~‘
to a
t
~~‘ti”ip~Jt’it
~‘ l’~I~~
a
‘i~~L;iots c’f35 III \drn.
‘.
ode
‘1(10, it)2.
I.
l’:11t’jjnaItI:~
,..::~,c._i~il!,
suhtn:t diat
this ae:i.’tI ‘~~.çl3fl.~.,ttIiSt’ n~ctle
Jctki
te
\Vl lFRIJ’f )uF:. .aflpicfl.’;iItIS. RoIl1’ti
F. N. \sSL1.,’\. )R,
l()~l
LII iii
K ‘\SS I
\. pro’
1’r ç~tt~)\•.t$’
an Order
anhi!ifl~L
kate
~.‘
their
wn~ntLdtacir Coniplaint
t~
u~’
:,Iterii:ttt°cto
sd .t
datc erlain
lhr
i’ie:Ii’:,e
‘at
‘Iti”. ,\leti.na
Respeci11i11 ,.nhti:ittc’d
N()1.Abk’J AW OH’R’t.
?
‘~‘~‘
.Attorne~t~r
l’~cspondeni
R013I1t1
I”. KASSLI.A. JR
KEt.LIE K. KASSE’I.A
‘I irunthv M.
Nolan
Mary Ann
SttlIi~an
NOlAN LAW OFUC’E
Attorneys tor I)ekndzmts
53 West Jackson Blvd., Suite 1137
Chicago.
It. 60604-3702
(312)322-1100; Fax (312)322-1106
This document
printed on recycled paper.

Back to top