ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERKS OFFICE, DECEMBER 1, 2005
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTiON CONTROL BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATiON, INC.
)
(BALDWIN ENERGY COMPLEX),
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
PCB2006-63
)
(CAAPP Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE
To:
Dorothy Guim, Clerk
Sheldon A. Zabel
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Kathleen C. Bassi
100 West Randolph Street
Stephen J. Bonebrake
Suite 11-500
IoshuaR. More
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Kavita
M Pate!
SchiffHardin, LLP
Bradley P. Halloran
6600 Sears Tower
Hearing Officer
233 South Wacker Drive
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Chicago, Illinois 60606
James R. Thompson Center
Suite 11-500
100 West Randolph Street
Chicago, Illinois 60601
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of
the Illinois Pollution Control Board the MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE RECORD of the Respondent, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, a copy of
which is herewith served upon the assigned Rearing Office and the attorney for the
Petitioner.
Respectfully submitted by,
Sally C~er
Assistant Counsel
Dated: December 1,2005
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK’S OFFICE, DECEMBER
1,
2005
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
DYNECY MIDWEST GENERATION, INC.
)
(BALD WiN ENERGY COMPLEX),
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
PCB2006-63
)
(CAAPP Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
)
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD
NOW COMES the Respondent, ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY (“illinois EPA”), by and through its attorneys, pursuant to 35 III. Adm. Code
105.116 and moves the ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD (“Board”) for an
extension of the time to file the record of its determination in the above-captioned matter.
I.
Petitioners filed their Petition with the Board on November 3,
2005,
seeking a review of certain permit conditions contained within the Clean Air Act Permit
Program (“CAAYP”) permit issued to Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc. (“Dynegy” or
“Baldwin”) by the Illinois EPA on September 29, 2005. The permit authorized the
operation of an electrical power generation facility known as the Baldwin Energy
Complex. The facility is located at 10901 Baldwin Road, Baldwin, Randolph County,
Illinois. Formal notice of the appeal was served upon the Illinois EPA on November?,
2005.
2.
On November 17, 2005, the Board accepted Dynegy’s Petition for
hearing. In addition, the Board ordered the Respondent to file the entire record of its
determination within 30 days of receipt of the Petition. If an extension of time to file the
1
ELECTRONIC
FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK’S OFFICE, DECEMBER 1, 2005
record would
be
sought
by
the Respondent, the Board’s order instructed that
such request
was also
due
within
30
days after the Illinois
EPA
received the Petition.
3.
The undersigned attorney and a staff paralegal became involved
with
the
compilation of the administrative record relating to Dynegy as early
as mid-August 2005
and since that time, most of this attorney’s and the staff paralegal’s resources have been
devoted to the compilation of this voluminous record and related records pertaining to the
twenty
CAAPP
permit appeals involving other electrical power generation facilities in
the State.
At
this
juncture, Baldwin’s
record consists generally of five to six trial boxes
of
material.
Approximately two to three
boxes
are particular to
Baldwin
alone,
while
three other
boxes
are more aptly characterized as general reference material and
documents relevant to the decision underlying the issuance of all twenty-one CAAPP
permits to the State’s electrical power generation facilities. The only remaining
documents to be assembled and reviewed for this record preparation generally consists of
several hundred miscellaneous electronic mail messages of Illinois EPA personnel.
Some, but not all, of these emails may contain information that were relied upon by the
Illinois EPA in its permit decision.
4.
The other assigned attorney, Robb Layman, became involved with the
compilation of the administrative record relating to this proceeding in November 2005.
Due to the press of other permit appeals before the United States Environmental
Protection Agency’s Environmental Appeals Board (“EAB”) and enforcement case
matters unrelated to the present appeal, Mr. Layman was generally unable to assist in the
compilation of the record until this past month.
2
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK’S OFFICE, DECEMBER 1, 2005
5.
Due to the sheer magnitude of the documentation
underlying
the Illinois
EPA’s permitting decision in this matter and the additional twenty CAAPP permit
appeals, the Illinois EPA was not able to compile the entire administrative record on or
before December 7,2005, Counsel expects that the compilation of the record will require
at least an additional seven days. Beyond this point, the timing of the filing of the
administrative record will likely be determined by matters largely outside of counsel’s
control.
6,
First, while counsel for the Illinois EPA has observed that many permit
appeals are of a type that could most aptly be described as “protective appeals” that do
not necessarily require the filing of an administrative record, it is counsel’s estimation
that some of the collective twenty-one appeals possess a much greater likelihood of
proceeding to hearing, thus necessitating the filing of an administrative record. While
this case is admittedly at the earliest stage of litigation, the permitting of this facility was
based upon years of work by the Bureau of Air’s permitting engineers and countless
communications with this facility and industry representatives at large. In addition, it is
also the Illinois EPA’s perception that the Boardmay not wish to accept voluminous
administrative records in this and all of the other collective CAAPP appeals unless it
appears that a settlement resolution cannot be reached.
7.
Second, the Illinois EPA does not possess the support-staff to make the
necessary copies for filing before the Board, the assigned Hearing Officer and opposing
counsel. For instance, if the Respondent were to seek leave from the Board for a waiver
olthe applicable copying requirements, the Respondent would still be mailing
approximately twenty-five to thirty trial boxes to the Board for Baldwin alone. This does
3
P
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK’S OFFICE, DECEMBER 1,2005
not include the five to six boxes that would bc required for both the Hearing Officer and
opposing counsel. Due to these constraints, counsel has been researching the possibility
of hiring an outside contractor to perform the required copying and/or screening.
However, the State is limited by further constraints; for instance, the Illinois EPA must
first seek to employ a contractor that.holds a State contract before turning to a non-State
contractor for copying services, While counsel has located State contractors that would
be willing to make 10,000 copies of ten. documents, counsel has not found a State
contractor willing to make seven copies of thousands of miscellaneous sized documents.
8:
Based on the foregoing, the Illinois EPA formally requests an extension of
time to file its administrative record with the Board to a date determined by the Board to
be appropriate and/or consistent with anydecisional deadline in this matter.
9.
The grant of this extension of the filing date will ensure that this
voluminous record is not needLessly filed but filed in the event that the matter does not
settle. This will serve to limit the expenditure of constrained State resources on a
potentially unnecessary copying job. Moreover, this will further minimize anypotential
administrative burdens associated with the maintenance and storage of hundreds of trial
boxes for this appeal, together with the other twenty CAAPP appeals for the Board and
the assigned Hearing Officer. In addition, an extension of this time period will not result
in anyhardship or prejudice to Petitioner.
4
-—
ELECTRONIC FILING, ~
WHEREFORE, the Illinois EPA respectfully requests that the Board grant this
Motion for Extension of Time to File Record to a date determined by the Board to be
appropriate andlor consistent with any decisional deadline in this matter.
Respectfully submitted by,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Sally A. garter
Assistant Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, illinois 62794-9276
(217)782-5544
S
ELECTRONIC F~NG,RECEIVED, CLERKS OFFICE, DECEMBER 1, 2005
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on the l~day of December 2005, 1 did send, by electronic
mail with prior approval, the following instrument entitled
MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RECORD to:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
and a true and correct copy of the same foregoing instrument, by First Class Mail with
postage thereon fully paid and deposited into the possession of the United States Postal
Service, to:
BradleyP. Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
JamesR. Thompson Center
Suite 11-500
100 West Randolph Street
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Sheldon A. Zabel
Kathleen C. Bassi
Stephen J. Bonebrake
Joshua R. More
Kavita M. Patel
SchiffHardin, LLP
6600 Sears Tower
233 South Wacker Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60606
4a1.ir ~ae~
Sally CaMer
Assistant Counsel