1. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CNTRO BAR
      1. THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
      2. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      3. AGREED MOTION TO REQUEST RELIEFFROM THE HEARING REQUIREMENT
      4. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      5.  
      6. III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
      7. A. Parties
      8. B. Site Description
      9. D. Non-Admission of Violations
      10. IV. APPLICABILITY
      11. V. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
      12. VI. IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC RESULTING FROM ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE
      13. VII. CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 42(h) FACTORS
      14. VIII. TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
      15. A. Penalty Payment
      16. D. Release from Liability
      17. E. Correspondence, Reports and Other Documents
      18. G. Enforcement of Board Order
      19. [The remainder of this page is left blank intentionally.I
      20. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CNTRO
BAR
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,)
Complainant,)
VS.
)
No. PCB 06-44
)
(Enforcement
-
Public
WEIS BUILDERS,
INC.,
)
Water Supply)
a Minnesota corporation,)
Respondent.
)
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
NOTICE OF FILING
TO:
Leonard
L. Burridge
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
General Counsel
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Weis Builders, Inc.
James R. Thompson Center
7645
Lyndale Avenue South
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423
Chicago, IL 60601
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of the
Illinois Pollution Control Board an original and nine copies of the Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement, an Agreed Motion for Relief from the Hearing Requirement, Notice of Filing and a
Certificate of Service, a copy of which is attached herewith and served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
State of Illinois
BY:
__________
ZEMEHERET BEREKET-AB
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 W. Randolph St., 20th Fl.
Chicago,
IL.
60601
(312) 814-3816
DATE:
November
7,
2005
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, NOVEMBER 7, 2005

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,)
Complainant,)
VS.
)
No. PCB 06-44
)
(Enforcement
-
Public
WETS BUILDERS, INC.,
)
Water Supply)
a Minnesota corporation,)
Respondent.)
AGREED MOTION TO REQUEST RELIEF
FROM THE HEARING REQUIREMENT
In support of this Motion, the parties state as follows:
1.
Today, the People of the State of Illinois, filed a Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement, with the Illinois Pollution Control Board.
2.
Section 3 1(c)(2) of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act, ("Act"), 415 TLCS
5/3 1(c)(2)(2004) provides:
Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (1) of this subsection (c),
whenever a complaint has been filed on behalf of the Agency or by the
People of the State of Illinois, the parties may file with the Board a
stipulation and proposal for settlement accompanied by a request for relief
from the requirement of a hearing pursuant to subdivision (1).
..
3.
Complainant and Respondent agree that a formal hearing is not necessary to
conclude this matter and wish to avail themselves of Section 31(c)(2) of the Act, 415 ILCS
5/31
(c)(2)(2004).
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, NOVEMBER 7, 2005

WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent request relief from the hearing requirement
pursuant to Section 3 1
(c)(2) of the Act.
Respectfully submitted,
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
State of Illinois
MATTHEW
J.
DUNN, Chief
Environmental Enforcement/
Asbestos Litigation Division
ROSEMARIE CAZEAU, Chief
Environmental Bureau
BY:
______
ZEMEHERET BEREKET-AB
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 W. Randolph St., 20th Fl.
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 814-3816
DATE:
November'7, 2005
G nvonralEnfocannt'
BEREKUr.ABMWeis
Agree Me to Req
Reief
Il-07-e5.wpd
2
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, NOVEMBER 7, 2005

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,)
Complainant,)
)
PCB 06-44
V.)
)
(Enforcement
-
Public
WEIS BUILDERS, INC.,
)Water
Supply)
a Minnesota corporation,)
Respondent.)
STIPULATION AND PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
Complainant, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, by LISA MADIGAN, Attorney
General of the State of Illinois, and WEIS BUILDERS, INC., ("Respondent"), have agreed to
the making of this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement ("Stipulation") and submit it to the
Illinois Pollution Control Board ("Board") for approval.
The parties agree that the statement of
facts contained herein represents a fair summary of the evidence and testimony which would be
introduced by the parties if a hearing were held.
The parties further stipulate that this statement
of facts is made and agreed upon for purposes of settlement only and that neither the fact that a
party has entered into this Stipulation, nor any of the facts stipulated herein, shall be introduced
into evidence in any other proceeding regarding the claims asserted in the Complaint except as
otherwise provided herein. If the Board approves and enters this Stipulation, Respondent agrees
to be bound by the Stipulation and Board Order and not to contest their validity in any
subsequent proceeding to implement or enforce their terms.
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, NOVEMBER 7, 2005

I.
JURISDICTION
The Board has jurisdiction of the subject matter herein and of the parties consenting
hereto pursuant to the Illinois Environmental Protection Act ("Act"), 415 ILCS 5/1
et seq.
(2004).
II.
AUTHORIZATION
The undersigned representatives for each party certify that they are fully authorized by
the party whom they represent to enter into the termns and conditions of this Stipulation and to
legally bind them to it.
III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
A.
Parties
1
.
On September 20, 2005, a Complaint was filed on behalf of the People of the
State of Illinois by Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of thb State of Illinois, on her own motion,
pursuant to Section 31 of the Act, 415 ELCS
5/31(2004),
against the'Respondent.
2.
At all times relevant to the Complaint, Respondent Weis Builders, Inc. ("Weis")
was and is a Minnesota corporation that is authorized to transact business in the State of Illinois.
B.
Site Description
1
.
At all times relevant to this Stipulation, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. owned and
operated the Home Depot store number 1989,located at 143rd Street and Bell Road, Homer
Township, Will County, Illinois ("construction site" or "project").
2.
On August 31, 2003, Home Depot, as the owner of the project, applied for a
construction permit for the installation of an 88 linear feet of 6-inch water main extension and
2,303 linear feet of 10-inch main to serve its new Home Depot store at the construction site.
2
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, NOVEMBER 7, 2005

3.
Respondent, Weis, was retained by Home Depot to install the water mains at the
construction site.
4.
On September
5,
2003, the Illinois EPA inspected the construction site and
discovered that Weis through its subcontractors had already installed the water main at the
project without first waiting for and obtaining the required construction permit from the Illinois
EPA.
5.
On October 1, 2003, the Illinois EPA issued, after the fact, "As-Built" Plans
Construction Permit No. 043 1
-FY2004 to Home Depot.
C.
Allegations
of Non-Compliance
Complainant contends that the Respondent has violated the following provisions of the
Act and Board regulations:
Count I:
Construction of Potable Water Lines Without a Construction Permit, in
violation of Section 18(a)(3) of the Act, 415 IILCS 5/18(a)(3)(2004), and
3 5 III. Adm. Code 602. 101 (a).
D.
Non-Admission
of Violations
Respondent Weis represents that it has entered into this Stipulation for the purpose of
settling and compromising disputed claims without having to incur the expense of contested
litigation.
By entering into this Stipulation and complying with its terms, Respondent Weis does
not affinnatively admit the allegations of violation within the Complaint and referenced within
Section THI.C herein, and this Stipulation shall not be interpreted as including such admission.
3

IV.
APPLICABILITY
This Stipulation shall apply to and be binding upon the Complainant and the Respondent,
and any officer, director, agent, or employee of the Respondent, as well as any successors or
assigns of the Respondent.
The Respondent shall not raise as a defense to any enforcement
action taken pursuant to this Stipulation the failure of any of its officers, directors, agents,
employees or successors or assigns to take such action as shall be required to comply with the
provisions of this Stipulation.
V. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
This Stipulation in no way affects the responsibilities of the Respondent to comply with
any other federal, state or local laws or regulations including, but not limited to, the Act and the
Board regulations, 35 Ill. Adm. Code, Subtitles A through H.
VI. IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC RESULTING FROM ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE
Section 33(c) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/33(c)(2004), provides as follows:
In making its orders and determinations, the Board shall take into
consideration all the facts and circumstances bearing upon the
reasonableness of the emissions, discharges, or deposits involved
including, but not limited to:
1.
the character and degree of injury to, or interference with the
protection of the health, general welfare and physical property of
the people;
2.
the sdcial and economic value of the pollution source;
3.
the suitability or unsuitability of the pollution source to the area in
which it is located, including the question of priority of location in
the area involved;
4.
the technical practicability and economic reasonableness of
reducing or eliminating the emissions, discharges or deposits
resulting from such pollution source; and
4

5.
any subsequent compliance.
In response to these factors, Complainant states the following:
1
.
Human health and the environment were threatened and the Illinois EPA's
information gathering responsibilities hindered by the Respondent's failure to first obtain a
construction permit prior to construction of the water mains.
2.
There is social and economic benefit to the Home Depot store.
3.
Operation of the Home Depot store is suitable for the area in which it is located.
4.
Waiting for the issuance of the construction permit prior to construction of the
water mains at the construction site and compliance with its terms was both
technically
practicable and economically reasonable.-
5.
Respondent has subsequently complied with the Act and the Board Regulations.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 42(h) FACTORS
Section
42(h)
of the Act,
415
ILCS 5/42(h)(2004),
provides as follows:
In determining the appropriate civil penalty to be imposed under .. , this
Section, the Board is authorized to consider any matters of record in
mitigation or aggravation of penalty, including but not limited to the
following factors:
1
.
the duration and gravity of the violation;
2.
the presence or absence of due diligence on the part of the
respondent in attempting to comply with requirements of this Act
and regulations thereunder or to secure relief therefrom as
provided by this Act;
3.
any economic benefits accrued by the respondent because of delay
in compliance with requirements, in which case the economfic
benefits shall be determined by the lowest cost alternative for
achieving compliance;
5

4.
the amount of monetary penalty which will serve to deter further
violations by the respondent and to otherwise aid in enhancing
voluntary compliance with this Act by the respondent and other
persons similarly subject to the Act;
5.
the number, proximity in time, and gravity of previously
adjudicated violations of this Act by the respondent;
6.
whether the respondent voluntarily self-disclosed, in accordance
with subsection i of this Section, the non-compliance to the
Agency; and
7.
whether the respondent has agreed to undertake a "supplemental
environmental project," which means an environmentally
beneficial project that a respondent agrees to undertake in
settlement of an enforcement action brought under this Act, but
which the respondent is not otherwise legally required to perform.
In response to these factors, Complainant states as follows:
1.
Construction of water mains without first obtaining a permit from the Illinois
EPA is a significant violation.
However, the violation was short lived.
The violation was
discovered on September 4, 2003, and was corrected with the issuance of "As-Built" permit on
Octobe r 8, 2003.
2.
Respondent did not show due diligence in attempting to comply with the
requirements of the Act and Board regulations.
3.
The Ten Thousand Dollars ($
10,000.00) penalty agreed to herein, negates the
economic benefits accrued by the Respondent by its failure to wait for the issuance of the
construction permit.
4.
Complainant has determined, based upon the specific facts of this matter, that a
penalty of Ten Thousand Dollars ($1 0,000.00) will serve to deter further violations and aid in
future voluntary compliance with the Act and Board regulations.
.6

5.
Complainant is not aware of any previous violations by Respondent.
6.
Respondent Weis did not voluntarily disclose the violations in-this matter.
7.
The settlement of this matter does not include a supplemental environmental
project.
VIII.
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
A.
Penalty Payment
1.
The Respondent shall pay a civil penalty in the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars
($
10,000.00) within thirty (30) days from the date the Board adopts and accepts this Stipulation.
The Respondent stipulates that payment has been tendered to Respondent's attorney of record in
this matter in a form acceptfible to that attorney.
Further, Respondent stipulates that said
attorney has been directed to make the penalty Payment on behalf of Respondent, within thirty
(30) days from the date the Board adopts and accepts this Stipulation, in a manner prescribed
below.
The penalty described in this Stipulation shall be paid by certified check or money order
made payable to the "Illinois Attorney General State Projects and Court Ordered Distribution
Fund" and sent by first class mail to:
Phyllis Dunton
Environmental Bureau
188 W. Randolph St., 20'I
Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
The name and number of the case and Respondent's Federal Employer Identification Number
("FEIN") shall appear on the face of the check.
A copy of the certified check or money order
and any transmittal letter shall be sent to:
7

Zemeheret Bereket-Ab
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 W. Randolph St., 20'h Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
2.
Pursuant to Section 42(g) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/42(g) (2004), interest shall
accrue on any payment not paid within the time period prescribed above at the maximum rate
allowable under Section 1003(a) of the Illinois Income Tax Act, 35 ILCS
5/1003
(2004).
Interest on any unpaid payment shall begin to accrue from the date the payment is due and
continue to accrue until the date payment is received.
When partial payment(s) are made, such
partial payment shall be first applied to any interest on unpaid payment then due and owing.
All
interest on payment owed shall be paid by certified check, money order or electronic funds
transfer, payable to the Illinois EPA, designated to the Illinois Environmental Protection Trust
Fund and delivered to the address and in the manner described above.
4.
For purposes of payment and collection, Respondent may be reached at the
following address:
Leonard L. Bumrdge
Weis Builders, Inc.
7645 Lyndale Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
55423
5.
In the event of default of this Section VMlLA, the Complainant shall be entitled to
all available relief including, but not limited to, reasonable costs of collection and reasonable
attorney's fees.
B.
Future
Use
Notwithstanding any other language in this Stipulation to the contrary, and in
consideration of the mutual promises and conditions contained in this Stipulation, including the
8

Release from Liability contained in Section VIEID, below, the Respondent hereby agrees that
this Stipulation may be used against the Respondent in any subsequent enforcement action or
permit proceeding as proof of a past adjudication of violation of the Act and the Board
Regulations promulgated thereunder for all violations alleged in the Complaint in this matter, for
purposes of Section 39(a) and (i) and/or 42(h) of the Act, 415 ELCS 5/39(a) and(i) and/or
5/42(h)(2004).
Further, Respondent agrees to waive any rights to contest, in any subsequent
enforcement action or permit proceeding, any allegations that these alleged violations were
adjudicated.
C.
Cease and Desist
The Respondent shall cease and desist from future violations of the Act and Board
Regulations that were the subject matter of the Complaint as outlined in Section TII.C
("Allegations of Non-Compliance") of this Stipulation.
D.
Release from Liability
In consideration of the Respondent's payment of the $1
0,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars)
penalty and any specified costs and accrued interest, its commitment, to Cease and Desist as
contained in Section VIII.C. herein, and upon the Pollution Control Board's acceptance and
approval of the terms of this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement, the Complainant releases,
waives and discharges the Respondent from any further liability or penalties for violations of the
Act and Board Regulations that were'the subject matter of the Complaint herein. The release set
forth above does not extend to any matters other than those expressly specified in Complainant's
Complaint filed on September 20, 2005. The Complainant reserves, and this Stipulation is
9

without prejudice to, all rights of the State of Illinois against the Respondent with respect to all
other matters, including but not limited to, the following:
a.
criminal liability;
b.
liability for future violation of state, federal, local, and common laws and/or
regulations;
C.
liability for natural resources damage arising out of the alleged violations; and
d.
liability or claims based on the Respondent's failure to satisfy the requirements of
this Stipulation.
*
Nothing in this Stipulation is intended as a waiver, discharge, release, or covenant not to
*sue for any claim or cause of action, administrative or judicial, civil or criminal, past or future, in
law or in equity, which the State of Illinois or the Illinois EPA may have against any person, as
defined by Section 3.315 of the Act, 415 ELCS 5/3.3
15
(2004), or entity other than the
Respondent.
E.
Correspondence, Reports and Other Documents
Any and all correspondence, reports and any other documents required under this
Stipulation, except for payments pursuant to Sections VII.A. 1. ("Penalty Payment") of this
Stipulation shall be submitted as follows:
As to the Complainant
Zemeheret Bereket-Ab
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 W. Randolph St., 20~"
Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
10

As to the Respondent
Leonard L. Burridge
General Counsel
Weis Builders, Inc.
7645
Lyndale
Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423
F.
Modification of Stipulation
The parties may, by mutual written consent, agree to extend any compliance dates or
modify the terms of this Stipulation.
A request for any modification shall be made in writing
and submitted to the contact persons identified in Section VIIJ.E.
Any such request shall be
made by separate document, and shall not be submitted within any other report or submittal
required by this Stipulation.
Any such agreed modification shall be in writing, signed by
authorized representatives of each party, and then accompany ajoint motion to the Illinois
Pollution Control Board seeking a modification of the prior order approving and accepting the
Stipulation to approve and accept the Stipulation as amended.
G.
Enforcement of Board Order
1
.
Upon the entry of the Board's Order approving and accepting this Stipulation and
Proposal for Settlement, that Order is a binding and enforceable order of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board and may be enforced as such through any and all available means.
2.
Respondent agrees that notice of any subsequent proceeding to enforce the Board
Order approving and accepting this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement may be made by
mail and waives any requirement of service of process.
3.
The parties agree that, if the Board does not approve and accept this Stipulation
and Proposal for Settlement, then neither party is bound by the terms herein.

4.
It is the intent of the Complainant and Respondent that the provisions of this
Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement and any Board Order accepting and approving such shall
be severable, and should any provision be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
inconsistent with state or federal law, and therefore unenforceable, the remaining clauses shall
remain in full force and effect.
[The remainder of this page is left blank intentionally.I
1
2

WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent request that the Board adopt and accept the
foregoing Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement as written.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
State of Illinois
MATTHEW
J.
DUNN, Chief
Environmental Enforcement!
Asbestos Litigation
Division
Environmental Bureau North
Assistant Attorney General
WEIS BUILDERS, INC.
BY:
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
DATE:
/
&
Q
Name:
/tA-ss4wc'M
A
tV44ZA'C
Title:___________________
GAEnvlrone~tm
Enfor..ntZ BEREKET-AB&WisBlder
Sspuato
913C.
13

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I,
ZEMEHERET BEREKET-AB3, an Assistant Attorney General, do certify that I caused
to be served on this
7h1
day of November 2005, the foregoing Notice of Filing, a Stipulation and
Proposal for Settlement, and an Agreed Motion for Relief from the Hearing Requirement, upon
the persons listed on said Notice by placing same in an envelope bearing sufficient postage with
the United States Postal Service located at 1 00 West Randolph Street, Chicago, Illinois.
ZEMEHERET BEREKET-AB
G:Envtnmeta
Enforcmnet'
B2REKET.ABfiWeisNOF&Certfiat
1I-07-05.wpd
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, NOVEMBER 7, 2005

Back to top